Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sulindac”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Sulindac sulfone inhibits azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats without reducing prostaglandin levels.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as sulindac, have cancer chemopreventive properties by a mechanism that has been suggested to involve cyclooxygenase inhibition and reduction of prostaglandin (PGE2) levels in the target tissue. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of dietary sulindac sulfone (500-2000 ppm), a metabolite of sulindac reported to lack cyclooxygenase inhibitory activity, on tumor formation and PGE2 levels in the azoxymethane model of colon carcinogenesis. Rats treated with sulindac at 400 ppm and piroxicam at 150 ppm were used as positive controls. Rats received two s.c. injections of azoxymethane (15 mg/kg) for 2 weeks and were fed either experimental or control diets until necropsy. After 31 weeks of sulfone treatment, a dose-related increase in sulfone levels in both serum and cecal contents was measured; there was no evidence of metabolic conversion to sulindac or other metabolites. Rats treated with sulfone at 1000 and 2000 ppm, sulindac, and piroxicam had significantly fewer colonic adenomas and carcinomas compared with rats fed control diet as measured by tumor incidence, multiplicity, and tumor burden. Sulfone-treated rats also showed a dose-response relationship for inhibiting all tumor parameters. Colons from rats treated with sulindac or piroxicam contained PGE2 levels that ranged from approximately 16-49% of control levels. PGE2 levels in rats treated with sulfone up to 2000 ppm ranged from 78-118% of control levels. Moreover, the effects of sulindac sulfone on various enzymes responsible for regulating prostaglandin levels were evaluated. No significant inhibitory effects were observed for cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, or phospholipase A2. These results suggest that reduction of prostaglandin levels in the target tissue may not be necessary for the chemopreventive properties of sulindac.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Sulindac metabolites inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor activation and expression.

BACKGROUND: Regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with a decreased mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). NSAIDs induce apoptotic cell death in colon cancer cells in vitro and inhibit growth of neoplastic colonic mucosa in vivo however, the biochemical mechanisms required for these growth inhibitory effects are not well defined. We previously reported that metabolites of the NSAID sulindac downregulate extracellular-signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling and that this effect is both necessary and sufficient for the apoptotic effects of these drugs. The goal of this project was to specifically test the hypothesis that sulindac metabolites block activation and/or expression of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR). METHODS: HT29 human colon cancer cells were treated with EGF, alone, or in the presence of sulindac sulfide or sulindac sulfone. Cells lysates were assayed by immunoblotting for phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR, pY1068), total EGFR, phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), total ERK1/2, activated caspase-3, and alpha-tubulin. RESULTS: EGF treatment rapidly induced phosphorylation of both EGFR and ERK1/2 in HT29 colon cancer cells. Pretreatment with sulindac metabolites for 24 h blocked EGF-induced phosphorylation of both EGFR and ERK1/2 and decreased total EGFR protein expression. Under basal conditions, downregulation of pEGFR and total EGFR was detected as early as 12 h following sulindac sulfide treatment and persisted through at least 48 h. Sulindac sulfone induced downregulation of pEGFR and total EGFR was detected as early as 1 h and 24 h, respectively, following drug treatment, and persisted through at least 72 h. EGFR downregulation by sulindac metabolites was observed in three different CRC cell lines, occurred prior to the observed downregulation of pERK1/2 and induction of apoptosis by these drugs, and was not dependent of caspase activation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that downregulation of EGFR signaling by sulindac metabolites may occur, at least in part, by inhibiting activation and expression of EGFR. Inhibition of EGFR signaling may account for part of the growth inhibitory and chemopreventive effects of these compounds.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Sulindac corrects defective apoptosis and suppresses azoxymethane-induced colonic oncogenesis in p53 knockout mice.

The acute apoptotic response to genotoxic carcinogens (AARGC) might be important for controlling the subsequent colonic mutational load and progression through oncogenesis. We have found previously that AARGC is p53-dependent with a gene-dosage effect, and that decreased AARGC in p53(+/-) and p53(-/-) mice is associated with increased susceptibility to carcinogen-induced oncogenesis. We tested the ability of sulindac to reverse these defects. The effect of sulindac on azoxymethane (AOM)-induced apoptosis was measured in colonic epithelium in wild-type, p53(+/-) and p53(-/-) mice, 8 hr after a single AOM injection. Sulindac supplementation (0.5 +/- 0.1 mg/day) restored defective AARGC in p53(+/-) but not in p53(-/-) mice. For effect on colon tumor development, sulindac treatment was started at age 4 weeks in wild-type, p53(+/-) and p53(-/-) mice; three weekly AOM injections were commenced at 6 weeks of age to induce tumors. Sulindac reduced significantly tumor incidence and multiplicity in wild-type mice (17% and 0.3 tumors/mouse compared to 36% and 0.8 respectively without drug), in p53(+/-)mice (38% and 0.8 compared to 64% and 1.63) and in p53(-/-) mice (63% and 1.0 compared to 90% and 1.74). Although loss of p53 function impairs the apoptotic response to AOM-induced DNA damage, sulindac is capable of partly restoring this defect. As sulindac also reverses the increased risk of oncogenesis due to p53 dysfunction, its enhancement of the apoptotic response to initiating mutations might act to reduce mutational load driving oncogenesis. Sulindac is an effective chemopreventive agent in the presence of p53 dysfunction.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Clinical and genomic influence of sulindac on rectal mucosa in familial adenomatous polyposis.

PURPOSE: A study was performed to evaluate the antiproliferative effects of low doses of the nonsteroidal drug, sulindac, on adenomas and rectal mucosa in familial adenomatous polyposis and to analyze the influence on tumor-suppressor genes and on apoptosis. METHODS: This was a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized Phase II dose-finding study for sulindac. The study group (n = 28) and control group (n = 10) underwent colectomy and ileorectal anastomoses, with repeated proctoscopy with endoluminal ultrasound and biopsies every three months. Dose-reduction of sulindac according to adenoma reversion was predetermined. Proliferation marker, Ki-67 (MIB1 and 5), on frozen or paraffin sections evaluated the antiproliferative effects; mutant p21ras, pantropic p53, mutant p53, and anti-bcl-2 were performed as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay procedures and/or immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections. RESULTS: All patients responded to sulindac after 24 weeks (at the latest). There was a significant reduction of adenomas and dose reduction to 67 mg/day after three years of therapy (Mann's test for trend, P < 0.001). Results consisted of 78 percent complete reversions, 22 percent partial reversions of adenomas at latest re-examination, and no influence on upper gastrointestinal tract adenomas. No influence was detected on repeated hemograms, liver, or renal function at high or low doses. There was a permanent antiproliferative effect (Ki-67) of low-dose sulindac, significant blocking of ras mutation activation, and a significant difference of untreated and treated mucosa in mutant p53 content (Wilcoxon's or Kruskal-Wallis each, P < 0.05). Reverse correlation of anti-bcl-2 and p53 immunostaining on mucosa sections was an indication of adenoma relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose antiproliferative sulindac therapy is highly effective in adenoma reversion in familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Sulindac shows influence on tumor-suppressor genes and on apoptosis markers. An immunostaining correlation indicates adenoma relapse in flat microadenomas in advance of macroscopic appearance. Low-dose sulindac treatment may develop into an additive permnanent therapy for colectomized familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2001

Relationship between APC genotype, polyp distribution, and oral sulindac treatment in the colon and rectum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

PURPOSE: Familial adenomatous polyposis is an inherited colorectal cancer syndrome characterized by the presence of multiple adenomatous colorectal polyps. Molecular studies have revealed that germline mutations in the APC gene are the underlying cause of the disease. The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent sulindac has been shown to reduce the number of colorectal adenomas. Most sulindac trials in the large bowel have focused on the distal colon and relatively little is known about its effect on the proximal colon. Moreover, it is unknown whether the site of the APC mutation affects the efficacy of sulindac. METHODS: This study investigated whether there were regional differences in the effect of sulindac on the colon and whether response to sulindac was dependent on the site of mutation in the APC gene. In an open prospective study 17 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were treated with 300 mg oral sulindac daily for four months followed by a washout phase of six months. Ten of the patients had an intact colon and seven had rectal stumps only. The number, size, and the degree of dysplasia of the adenomas were evaluated by colonoscopy at entry, end of treatment and end of the study. RESULTS: Overall, a statistically significant decrease in the number of adenomas was observed (120 +/- 112 to 28 +/- 64, P = 0.007). After cessation of sulindac treatment the number of adenomas increased to 48 +/- 44.5, but remained significantly lower than the values observed at baseline. In the ten patients with intact colons, adenomas decreased by sevenfold in the proximal colon (103 +/- 73 to 15.1 +/- 47.4, P = 0.011) and twofold in the distal colon (80 +/- 52 to 29.6 +/- 37.2, P = 0.005). The size of adenomas and the grade of dysplasia also decreased. No correlation could be seen between the APC mutation site and the response to treatment. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that sulindac reduces the number of adenomas in the entire colon and that the effect seems to be more pronounced in the proximal colon.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2001

Enhanced apoptosis and transforming growth factor-beta1 expression in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas after Sulindac therapy.

PURPOSE: We tried to elucidate the effects of sulindac on human colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Sulindac (300 mg/day) was administered for two weeks before operation to 33 patients with sporadic colorectal carcinoma (Sulindac Group). Resected specimens were used to detect apoptosis by terminal dUTP nick end labeling and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 expression by immunohistochemistry. The results were compared with those from the historical Control Group. Twenty-nine available preoperative biopsies taken from carcinomas before sulindac prescription and 22 concurrent colorectal adenomas (9 and 13 in Sulindac and Control Groups, respectively) in the resected specimen were also examined regarding TGF-beta1 expression. RESULTS: In the resected carcinomas and adenomas, more frequent apoptosis and higher TGF-beta1 scores were observed in the Sulindac Group than in the Control Group. Overexpression of TGF-beta1 and apoptosis occurred in the same region in adenomas but not in carcinomas. A positive correlation between TGF-beta1 scores and apoptotic frequency was found in adenomas (P = 0.01, rho = 0.91) but not in carcinomas (P = 0.89, rho = 0.03). CONCLUSION: We conclude that sulindac induces apoptosis in human colorectal carcinomas as well as in adenomas. Also, one of the antineoplastic effects of sulindac might be mediated by upregulating TGF-beta1 expression, particularly in colorectal adenomas.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2006

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the multi-drug resistance protein-1 (MRP-1) inhibitor sulindac, in combination with epirubicin in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: Multi-drug resistance mediated by ATP-binding cassette trans-membrane protein pumps is an important cause of cancer treatment failure. Sulindac has been shown to be a competitive substrate for the clinically important resistance protein, multi-drug resistance protein-1 (MRP-1), and thus might enhance the anti-cancer activity of substrate chemotherapeutic agents, e.g. anthracyclines. METHODS: We conducted a dose-escalating, single arm, prospective, open label, non-randomised phase I trial of epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) in combination with escalating oral doses of sulindac (0-800 mg) in patients with advanced cancer to identify an appropriate dose of sulindac to use in future resistance studies. Anthracycline and sulindac pharmacokinetics were studied in cycles 1 and 3. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (8 breast, 3 lung, 2 bowel, 1 melanoma, 1 renal, 1 ovarian and 1 of unknown primary origin, 16/17 having had prior chemotherapy) were enrolled. Eight patients received a full six cycles of treatment; 14 patients received three or more cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in two patients at 800 mg sulindac (1 renal impairment, 1 fatal haemoptysis in a patient with advanced lung cancer), and sulindac 600 mg was deemed to be the maximum tolerated dose. Sulindac had no effect on epirubicin pharmacokinetics. Among 15 patients with evaluable tumour, two partial responses were seen (malignant melanoma and breast cancer). Four others had prolonged stable disease. CONCLUSION: Epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) and sulindac 600 mg are the recommended doses for phase II studies for these agents in combination.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2007

Sulindac-derived reactive oxygen species induce apoptosis of human multiple myeloma cells via p38 mitogen activated protein kinase-induced mitochondrial dysfunction.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are well known to induce apoptosis of cancer cells independent of their ability to inhibit cyclooxygenase-2, but the molecular mechanism for this effect has not yet been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential signaling components underlying sulindac-induced apoptosis in human multiple myeloma (MM) cells. We found that sulindac induces apoptosis by promoting ROS generation, accompanied by opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores, release of cytochrome c and apoptosis inducing factor from mitochondria, followed by caspase activation. Bcl-2 cleavage and down-regulation of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) family including cIAP-1/2, XIAP, and survivin, occurred downstream of ROS production during sulindac-induced apoptosis. Forced expression of survivin and Bcl-2 blocked sulindac-induced apoptosis. Most importantly, sulindac-derived ROS activated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and p53. SB203580, a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, and RNA inhibition of p53 inhibited the sulindac-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, p53, Bax, and Bak accumulated in mitochondria during sulindac-induced apoptosis. All of these events were significantly suppressed by SB203580. Our results demonstrate a novel mechanism of sulindac-induced apoptosis in human MM cells, namely, accumulation of p53, Bax, and Bak in mitochondria mediated by p38 MAPK activation downstream of ROS production.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1995

Placental transfer of sulindac and its active sulfide metabolite in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate whether the human placenta is permeable to sulindac or its active sulfide metabolite. STUDY DESIGN: Nine pregnant patients (median gestational age [range]: 31.8 [24.3 to 36.4] weeks) were given a 200 mg oral dose of sulindac 5.5 (4.4 to 6.7) hours before 18 intravascular transfusions for rhesus or Kell alloimmunization. At each procedure maternal and fetal serum levels of sulindac and the active sulfide metabolite were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The maternal sulfide level was significantly higher than the fetal sulfide levels, but no significant difference was noted between maternal and fetal sulindac levels. The sulfide fetal/maternal ratio was significantly lower than the sulindac fetal/maternal ratio. The sulfide/sulindac ratio was significantly higher in maternal serum versus fetal serum. The sulfide/sulindac ratio correlated with time from drug ingestion to sampling on the maternal side only. In patients studied on more than one occasion no consistent relationship between fetal sulindac, fetal sulfide, or fetal sulfide/sulindac ratio, and gestational age could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The placenta is permeable to sulindac but less so to its active sulfide metabolite. The reduction of sulindac to its active sulfide metabolite is decreased in the human fetus.

Female↗
PubMed1995

Effect of sulindac on sporadic colonic polyps.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to determine in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study if the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac causes regression of sporadic colonic polyps. The impetus for this study is the profound regressive effect of sulindac on polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients undergoing routine screening flexible sigmoidoscopy were enrolled if they had polyps of < or = 1 cm in size. Of 162 patients screened, 22 patients were randomly enrolled to take 150 mg of sulindac twice daily, and 22 patients took a placebo. Treatment duration was 4 months and was followed by colonoscopy with removal of all polyps. RESULTS: Four patients were dropped from the study (sulindac group) due to urosepsis (1 patient), heartburn (2 patients), and anemia (1 patient). Compliance (determined by monthly pill counting), mean age, and the effect of sulindac vs. placebo on polyp regression or size were not statistically different in the two treatment groups. Analysis of our data indicated that there is only a 0.8% chance that the probability of polyp regression with sulindac is as large as 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Four months of treatment with sulindac does not result in a clinically significant regression of sporadic colonic polyps, although a small effect may not have been detected by the size of our study. Our data suggest that the biological response of sporadic and familial polyposis polyps to sulindac is different.

Aged↗
PubMed1982

Effects of sulindac on in vitro immunologic function and on prostaglandin production by human peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes.

Prostaglandins (PG) appear to regulate immune-mediated inflammation, but the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Several families of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been observed to inhibit PG synthesis. Among these drugs, sulindac sulfide is a potent inhibitor of PG production while its parent pro-drug, sulindac sulfoxide (sulindac), lacks PG synthesis inhibitory activity in cell-free systems. We have studied the effects of sulindac sulfoxide on the blastogenic response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) stimulated by exposure to alloantigens and mitogens in vitro. Sulindac inhibited proliferation of activated PBMC in a dose-dependent manner but had little effect on the proliferation of unstimulated cells. The inhibition of mitogen-induced blastogenesis correlated with both the uptake of radiolabeled drug and the inhibition of in vitro production of PG (PGE and PGF) by mitogen-activated PBMC. These data indicate a functional relationship between PG synthesis and immune cell activation which may also apply to PBMC activated in vivo by autoimmune disease. Metabolism of sulindac sulfoxide by PBMC in vitro produced too little sulindac sulfide to adequately explain the inhibition of PG production. These data suggest that immunomodulation by sulindac may be due to a direct inhibition of cellular activation. Thus, it is proposed that decreased PG production may be a result rather than the cause of the hypoproliferative response.

Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic↗
PubMed2002

Synergistic effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate with sulindac against colon carcinogenesis of rats treated with azoxymethane.

(-)-Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a major constituent of green tea, has been shown to exhibit anti-cancer activity. Sulindac is also well known as a cancer-preventive agent against colon cancer, but its usage is restricted because of its adverse effects, as exemplified by gastrointestinal bleeding. In the present study, we examined whether a combination of EGCG and sulindac shows synergistic effects for cancer-preventive activity for rat colon carcinogenesis induced by azoxymethane (AOM); we examined the number of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) representing preneoplastic lesions, the argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) as an indicator of cell proliferation, and the incidence of apoptosis. The AOM treatment induced an average of 46.2+/-4.9 ACF/colon, and sulindac and EGCG significantly reduced the incidence of ACF/colon to 21.4+/-3.4 and 19.5+/-5.8, respectively (P<0.01). The co-treatment with EGCG and sulindac resulted in significantly reduced ACF formation (10.0+/-3.2; P<0.01). The results of the AgNOR analysis indicated that the treatment with EGCG and/or sulindac suppressed AOM-induced cell proliferation. The present results also revealed that the combination of EGCG and sulindac synergistically enhanced apoptosis significantly (P<0.01). Thus, our findings suggest that EGCG with sulindac synergistically suppresses ACF formation by enhancing apoptosis and, therefore, that EGCG is a suitable candidate for use in combination with cancer-preventive agents, such as sulindac, to reduce their adverse effects.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

The metabolism of sulindac enhances its scavenging activity against reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.

Sulindac is a sulfoxide prodrug that, in vivo, is converted to the metabolites sulindac sulfide and sulindac sulfone. It is therapeutically used as an anti-inflammatory and analgesic in the symptomatic treatment of acute and chronic rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. In addition to its anti-inflammatory properties, sulindac and its metabolites have been shown to have an important role in the prevention of colonic carcinogenesis. Although the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis constitutes the primary mechanism of action of sulindac, it is well known that reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are implicated in the pathophysiology of inflammation and cancer. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the scavenging activity of sulindac and its sulfone and sulfide metabolites for an array of ROS (HO*, O2(*-), and HOCl) and RNS (*NO and ONOO-) using in vitro systems. The results we obtained demonstrate that the metabolism of sulindac increases its scavenging activity for all RNS and ROS studied, notably with regard to the scavenging of HOCl. These effects may strongly contribute to the anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic efficacy that has been shown for sulindac.

Hydroxyl Radical↗
PubMed1995

Sulindac in established experimental diabetes: a follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: In two previous studies we have demonstrated prevention of electrophysiological abnormalities of nerve in experimental STZ (streptozotocin)-induced diabetes (ED) of rats using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents: indomethacin and sulindac. Sulindac might benefit ED because it inhibits both cyclo-oxygenase and aldose reductase. METHODS: In this work, we examined whether 1 month of sulindac treatment reversed or improved established biochemical and electrophysiological abnormalities in experimental diabetes of 3 months duration. Sulindac-treated diabetic rats (6.0 mg/kg 5/7 days weekly by gavage) were compared to untreated diabetics, nondiabetic controls and sulindac treated control rats. RESULTS: Diabetic rats developed slowing of conduction velocity in caudal sensory, sural sensory, caudal motor and sciatic tibial motor fibers. Sulindac improved caudal motor and, to a lesser extent sural sensory conduction but not caudal sensory or sciatic tibial motor conduction. Sulindac did not alter sciatic sugars or polyols. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac provided modest improvement in some indices of experimental neuropathy in this reversal study, but there was less efficacy than in the preventative study. Reversal paradigms should be examined in all experimental therapies for diabetic neuropathy.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Effects of sulindac and its metabolites on growth and apoptosis in human mammary epithelial and breast carcinoma cell lines.

Nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used medications in the United States and elsewhere, mainly for the treatment of arthritis. The NSAID sulindac causes regression and prevents the recurrence of premalignant colonic polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and inhibits colon carcinogenesis in rodents. Sulindac and sulindac sulfone, a metabolite of sulindac that lacks cyclooxygenase (cox) inhibitory activity, also inhibit mammary carcinogenesis in rats. To obtain insights into the relevance of these findings to human breast cancer, we examined the mechanism of action of sulindac and its sulfide and sulfone metabolites on the normal human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10F and the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Of the three compounds, the sulfide was the most potent inhibitor of cell growth, although the sulfone and sulfoxide were also active at higher concentrations. Treatment of MCF-10F and MCF-7 cells with 100 microM sulindac sulfide resulted in accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and induction of apoptosis. Apoptosis occurred within 24 h as determined by the TUNEL assay and DNA laddering was observed at 72 h. The accumulation of cells in G1 was associated with decreased levels of expression of cyclin D1 but no effect was seen on the expression of CDK4 or the immediate early response gene c-jun. Treatment with sulindac sulfide caused a striking induction of the CDK inhibitor p21WAF1 in MCF-10F cells. The MCF-7 cell line expressed a high basal level of p21WAF1 which did not change significantly after drug treatment. The pro-apoptotic gene BAX was not induced in either MCF-10F or MCF-7 cells by sulindac sulfide. Stable overexpression of cyclin D1, which frequently occurs in breast cancers, did not protect mammary epithelial cells from inhibition by the sulfide. These studies suggest that this class of compounds warrants further study with respect to breast cancer prevention and treatment.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1988

Pharmacokinetic interactions between NSAIDs (indomethacin or sulindac) and H2-receptor antagonists (cimetidine or ranitidine) in human volunteers.

The reciprocal effects on pharmacokinetic parameters after a single oral dose of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) indomethacin and sulindac and repeated oral doses of the H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine and ranitidine were determined in two groups of nine healthy subjects each (indomethacin and sulindac groups). Administration of NSAIDs increased the AUC and decreased the oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution of the H2-receptor antagonists without modifying their t1/2. Urinary data and observed modifications in ranitidine and cimetidine metabolites seem to justify a greater increase of H2-receptor antagonist bioavailability with indomethacin (p less than 0.05) than with sulindac (NS). The administration of ranitidine significantly reduced the sulindac volume of distribution without modifying its clearance, which caused an increase in the maximum concentration and a decrease in the t1/2 (p less than 0.05). The effects of cimetidine on the two NSAIDs were more intense than the effect of ranitidine: the decrease in sulindac volume of distribution (p less than 0.02) was accompanied by a significant reduction in sulindac clearance (p less than 0.05). AUC and urinary amounts of sulindac's sulfone metabolite were decreased. These results show that NSAIDs increased the bioavailability of H2-receptor antagonists, and that the latter drugs decrease the volume of distribution of NSAIDs. Furthermore, cimetidine modifies the oxidation metabolism of sulindac.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Sulindac enhances cell proliferation in DMH-treated mouse colonic mucosa.

In a previous study we reported that the NSAID sulindac had a marked inhibitory effect on the development of colonic tumours in mice treated with the carcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH). In this study we examined the effects of sulindac in respect of cell-kinetic changes in mouse colonic mucosa as determined by flash labelling with the thymidine analogue bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) at varying intervals during the process of colonic carcinogenesis. We also investigated the possibility that these changes may be modulated by misoprostol a prostaglandin E1 analogue. Four groups of 36 mice each were treated for 18 weeks with the following drug/s respectively: (1) DMH; (2) DMH and sulindac; (3) DMH, sulindac and misoprostol; and (4) DMH and misoprostol. Three animals from each group were killed each week between the sixth week and the eighteenth week after the start of the experiment. A 1-h flash label technique was employed and paraffin sections of colonic mucosa were examined. For each animal a total of 50 perfect axially cut crypts were chosen and the following parameters determined: crypt length, labelling index and labelling index distribution: the data were analysed using the computer program GLIM. For each of the four groups, crypt lengths increased significantly with the duration of treatment with no significant difference between the groups. In sulindac-treated animals the labelling index for all positions increased with duration of treatment whereas for animals not treated with sulindac there was no significant difference in labelling index with respect to duration of treatment. The administration of misoprostol did not appear to significantly alter the effects of sulindac. It is postulated that the observed increase in cell proliferation could be a compensatory phenomenon occurring secondary to loss of crypt epithelial cells by apoptosis induced by sulindac. Also the finding of an increase in labelling index mediated by a chemopreventive agent indirectly questions the rationale behind the therapeutic manipulation of crypt cell proliferation in order to reduce the risk of colon cancer.

1,2-Dimethylhydrazine↗
PubMed1999

Sulindac inhibits activation of the NF-kappaB pathway.

Sulindac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent that is related both structurally and pharmacologically to indomethacin. In addition to its anti-inflammatory properties, sulindac has been demonstrated to have a role in the prevention of colon cancer. Both its growth inhibitory and anti-inflammatory properties are due at least in part to its ability to decrease prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting the activity of cyclooxygenases. Recently, we demonstrated that both aspirin and sodium salicylate, but not indomethacin, inhibited the activity of an IkappaB kinase beta (IKKbeta) that is required to activate the nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) pathway. In this study, we show that sulindac and its metabolites sulindac sulfide and sulindac sulfone can also inhibit the NF-kappaB pathway in both colon cancer and other cell lines. Similar to our previous results with aspirin, this inhibition is due to sulindac-mediated decreases in IKKbeta kinase activity. Concentrations of sulindac that inhibit IKKbeta activity also reduce the proliferation of colon cancer cells. These results suggest that the growth inhibitory and anti-inflammatory properties of sulindac may be regulated in part by inhibition of kinases that regulate the NF-kappaB pathway.

Animals↗