Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sulbactam”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

A sensitive assay for clavulanic acid and sulbactam in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography and precolumn derivatization.

Precolumn derivatization procedures using 1,2,4-triazole for the detection and quantitation of sulbactam and clavulanic acid spiked into urine and blood serum at trace levels have been developed. Sulbactam and clavulanic acid produced derivatives which absorbed maximally at 325 and 315 nm, respectively. The methods allow the detection of clavulanic acid and sulbactam down to 0.05 micrograms ml-1 in serum and 0.5 micrograms ml-1 in urine. The relative standard deviation for five replicate analyses of sulbactam and clavulanic acid at a concentration of 20 micrograms ml-1 in serum and urine ranged from 2-6%. In further HPLC experiments with sulbactam in phosphate buffer solution, ampicillin was found as a contaminant (0.5% by mass) in the sulbactam sample provided. The significance of this finding is discussed.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

The in vitro effect of sulbactam on polymorphonuclear leukocyte function.

The effects of sulbactam on polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) chemotaxis, respiratory burst, and microbicidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus were evaluated in vitro. PMNs from normal adult volunteers were incubated with 0.5, 2, 5, 10, and 20 micrograms/ml of sulbactam for 30 min each. At concentrations of 5 and 10 micrograms/ml, sulbactam was found to enhance PMN bactericidal activity. No inhibitory effects on PMN function were noted at the concentrations of sulbactam that were tested. In addition, the in vitro inhibitory effect of ampicillin on PMN chemiluminescence was partially abrogated by the presence of sulbactam. These findings suggest that the microbicidal phagocytic response of human PMNs against S. aureus may be improved in vitro using concentrations of sulbactam that may be readily achieved with therapeutic doses of sulbactam/ampicillin.

Adult↗

In vitro activity of beta-lactam drugs and sulbactam against Chlamydia trachomatis.

We tested the in vitro activity of ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone, cefoperazone-sulbactam, and sulbactam against 18 recent clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis and two ATCC strains. Ampicillin (MIC50, 256 micrograms/ml) and sulbactam (MIC50, 128 micrograms/ml) demonstrated some activity against C. trachomatis, but cefoperazone had little to no activity. At 2-3 dilutions below the MIC, C. trachomatis treated with ampicillin or sulbactam, but not cefoperazone, formed small inclusions that remained small on passage onto antibiotic-free McCoy cells. It appears that ampicillin and sulbactam suppress rather than kill C. trachomatis.

Ampicillin↗

Multiresistant Acinetobacter infections: a role for sulbactam combinations in overcoming an emerging worldwide problem.

Recent studies have highlighted the emergence of infections involving multiresistant Acinetobacter clinical isolates. Sulbactam offers direct antimicrobial activity against Acinetobacter species. Accordingly, co-administration of sulbactam with ampicillin or cefoperazone offers the potential of effective empirical therapy against Acinetobacter and other bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae in institutions in which they are susceptible. Many in vitro studies have indicated that Acinetobacter remains fully susceptible to ampicillin-sulbactam or cefoperazone-sulbactam. Furthermore, ampicillin-sulbactam has proven clinically effective and well tolerated in the treatment of severe acinetobacter infections, including bacteremia. Therefore, ampicillin-sulbactam is a sensible option for the treatment of life-threatening acinetobacter infections.

Acinetobacter↗

Effect of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered cefoperazone and sulbactam.

The pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone 2 g combined with sulbactam 1 g after a single dose administered intravenously were evaluated in 24 subjects with normal and impaired renal function. Subjects were categorized into four groups based on endogenous creatinine clearance Clcr. Patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 had ClcrS of greater than 60, 31 to 60, and 10 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Patients in group 4 required maintenance haemodialysis and were assumed to have Clcr less than 10 mL/min/1.73 m2. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. No significant differences (P greater than 0.05) in mean peak serum cefoperazone-sulbactam concentrations for group 1 (208.4/29.0 mg/L), group 2 (199.0/34.1 mg/L), group 3 (163.2/35.0 mg/L), and group 4 (234.0/66.0 mg/L) were noted. Correlations between both total serum (r = 0.58) and renal (r = 0.35) clearance and creatinine clearances were negative for cefoperazone, although both were shown to decline with diminished renal function. Correlations between serum (r = 0.85) and renal (r = 0.72) clearances and creatinine clearance for sulbactam were, on the other hand, both positive and declined in a linear fashion. No significant differences in steady state volumes of distribution were noted for either cefoperazone (P = 0.53) or sulbactam (P = 0.85) amongst the four groups. After 24 h, urinary recovery was also comparable for both cefoperazone (P = 0.64) and sulbactam (P = 0.85) amongst the four groups. The concentrations of cefoperazone and sulbactam remained at or above the MICs (16/8 mg/L) for common bacterial pathogens for 2.5, 3, 7 and 14 h in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

Adolescent↗

An enzymatic method for assaying sulbactam in human serum: comparison with high performance liquid chromatography.

An enzymatic method using nitrocefin as substrate was developed to assay sulbactam in human serum. Serum containing sulbactam was incubated with purified titrated TEM-1 beta-lactamase and nitrocefin was then added to the mixture to determine the remaining beta-lactamase activity and consequently the concentration of sulbactam. Assays were carried out on five patients with pulmonary infections receiving sulbactam plus amoxycillin iv. The values for serum sulbactam concentrations determined by the enzymatic method were compared with those determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The correlation coefficient was 0.990 for serum sulbactam concentrations below 15 mg/L.

Adult↗

Sulbactam efficacy in experimental models caused by susceptible and intermediate Acinetobacter baumannii strains.

Sulbactam and imipenem were compared in an experimental pneumonia model in immunocompetent mice, using a susceptible strain of Acinetobacter baumannii, and in an experimental endocarditis model in rabbits, using an intermediately susceptible strain. In the former, sulbactam was as efficacious as imipenem in terms of survival, sterility of lungs and in the bacterial clearance from lungs and blood, provided that the t > MIC for sulbactam (1.84 h) was similar to that for imipenem (2.01 h). In the endocarditis model, imipenem (t > MIC, 2.12 h) was more efficacious than sulbactam (t > MIC, 1.17 h) in bacterial clearance from vegetations. These results show the efficacy of sulbactam in infections caused by susceptible strains of A. baumannii, with an MIC up to 4 mg/L, provided that doses reach a t > MIC similar to that of imipenem. The activity of sulbactam was time dependent.

Acinetobacter↗

Kinetic studies on inactivation of Citrobacter freundii cephalosporinase by sulbactam.

The inactivation kinetics for inhibition by sulbactam (CP45,899) of Citrobacter freundii GN346 cephalosporinase were studied in detail and compared with those of type Ib penicillinase or TEM-2 beta-lactamase mediated by R plasmid RGN823. The rate constant for progressive inactivation of the cephalosporinase was significantly larger than that measured with the penicillinase. The number of sulbactam molecules required to cause complete inactivation of one cephalosporinase molecule (turnover number) was 80. The turnover number for the penicillinase was 5,200. The powerful inhibition by sulbactam of this cephalosporinase is similar to clavulanic acid inhibition of the penicillinase (turnover number, 115; reported by others). The affinity of sulbactam for the cephalosporinase, expressed as Ki, was 500 microM; this value was much higher than that for the penicillinase, which was estimated to be 0.5 microM. These results indicated that sulbactam is an effective progressive inactivator but a poor competitive inhibitor for the cephalosporinase. Our study also revealed that the cephalosporinase and sulbactam formed a long-lived inhibitor-enzyme complex which we termed the pseudo-irreversible complex. The half-life of the complex was 550 min at pH 7.0 and 30 degrees C.

Binding, Competitive↗

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and toleration of intravenously administered cefoperazone and sulbactam when given as single agents or in combination.

The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and toleration of cefoperazone (3 g every 12 h) and sulbactam (1.5 g every 12 h) were studied when these antimicrobial agents were administered continuously over 7 days as a 15-min infusion of individual agents and as a 3/1.5-g cefoperazone-sulbactam combination. Fourteen male volunteers participated in an open, three-way crossover study of Latin Square design with a 1-week washout period between phases. On days 1 and 7 of each phase, serial serum samples and urine were collected for drug assay over a 12-h period. Hematological and clinical chemistry determinations were made within 10 days before the first antibiotic dose and for each treatment phase just before the first dose, on day 4 of treatment, and within 24 h of the last dose. For cefoperazone as a single agent on days 1 and 7, the average maximal concentration in serum (Cmax) was approximately 430 micrograms/ml, the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) was 1.8 h, and the average percentage of dose excreted unchanged in the urine (%Ur) was 30%. For sulbactam as a single agent, the Cmax was approximately 90 micrograms/ml, the t1/2 was 1 h, and the %Ur was 89% on days 1 and 7. When comparing individual versus simultaneous drug administration, the only pharmacokinetic alteration observed was a statistically significant but minor (about 10%) decrease in sulbactam renal clearance, on both days 1 and 7, resulting in a similar decrease in total body clearance (CL). The area under the curve, apparent volume of distribution by the area method (V), t1/2, and Cmax were not significantly altered. Although cefoperazone pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly altered when comparing single-agent to combination drug administration, the area under the curve was slightly lower and CL, nonrenal clearance, and V were modestly higher from day 1 to day 7. Because Cmax and t1/2 were unaffected, these minor day effects would not be of clinical significance. Intravenous administration of cefoperazone and sulbactam given as individual agents compared with the combination did not show pharmacokinetic differences that are likely to produce clinically relevant effects. The combination of cefoperazone and sulbactam was well tolerated, and the safety profile of the combination was similar to that either drug given alone under the conditions of this study.

Adult↗

Efficacy of oxacillin and ampicillin-sulbactam combination in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus.

Optimal therapy of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible, beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus has not been established. We used a rat model of aortic valve endocarditis to examine efficacies of antibiotic regimens against a borderline oxacillin-susceptible strain as compared with a fully susceptible S. aureus strain. Animals were treated with oxacillin alone or in combination with sulbactam or with ampicillin-sulbactam combinations at two dose levels. Infections caused by the borderline susceptible and fully susceptible strains responded equally well to oxacillin alone, with residual bacterial titers in vegetations falling to 4.8 +/- 1.6 and 4.4 +/- 1.7 (mean +/- standard deviation) log10 CFU/g, respectively. Addition of sulbactam to oxacillin (1:2) did not enhance the efficacy of oxacillin against either strain in the animal model. A high-dose regimen of ampicillin-sulbactam (2:1) yielding mean (+/- standard deviation) levels in serum of 16.8 +/- 7.4 and 9.5 +/- 1.1 micrograms/ml, respectively, proved equally effective against both strains (bacterial titers, 6.6 log10 CFU/g). However, at lower doses (8.3 +/- 2.6 and 5.9 +/- 2.4 micrograms/ml, the combination showed greater efficacy against the fully susceptible strain, with residual titers of 7.1 +/- 2.0 versus 9.0 +/- 1.6 log10 CFU/g (P less than 0.05). In vitro studies revealed that the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam was also a potent inducer of staphylococcal beta-lactamase at clinically relevant concentrations. Based on this short-term in vivo therapy study, oxacillin would be predicted to be clinically effective in the therapy of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus, while the combination of ampicillin with sulbactam appears to be inferior to oxacillin alone against such infections.

Ampicillin↗

Use of ampicillin-sulbactam for treatment of experimental meningitis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Escherichia coli K-1.

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of ampicillin combined with sulbactam in a rabbit model of meningitis due to a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Escherichia coli K-1. Ceftriaxone was used as a comparison drug. The MIC and MBC were 32 and greater than 64 micrograms/ml (ampicillin), greater than 256 and greater than 256 micrograms/ml (sulbactam), 2.0 and 4.0 micrograms/ml (ampicillin-sulbactam [2:1 ratio, ampicillin concentration]) and 0.125 and 0.25 micrograms/ml (ceftriaxone). All antibiotics were given by intravenous bolus injection in a number of dosing regimens. Ampicillin and sulbactam achieved high concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with higher dose regimens, but only moderate bactericidal activity compared with that of ceftriaxone was obtained. CSF bacterial titers were reduced by 0.6 +/- 0.3 log10 CFU/ml/h with the highest ampicillin-sulbactam dose used (500 and 500 mg/kg of body weight, two doses). This was similar to the bactericidal activity achieved by low-dose ceftriaxone (10 mg/kg), while a higher ceftriaxone dose (100 mg/kg) produced a significant increase in bactericidal activity (1.1 +/- 0.4 log10 CFU/ml/h). It appears that ampicillin-sulbactam, despite favorable CSF pharmacokinetics in animals with meningitis, may be of limited value in the treatment of difficult-to-treat beta-lactamase-producing bacteria, against which the combination shows only moderate in vitro activity.

Ampicillin↗

Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in the ambulatory setting: trial of cefoxitin and doxycycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam.

Ampicillin-sulbactam (750 mg) given orally twice daily for 10 days was evaluated for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in an ambulatory setting in Nairobi, Kenya. The first 26 women received ampicillin-sulbactam in an open-label fashion, and the remaining 75 women were randomly selected to receive either ampicillin-sulbactam (n = 38) or cefoxitin (2 g) intramuscularly and probenecid (1 g) orally, followed by doxycycline (100 mg) orally twice daily for 10 days (n = 37). Women were enrolled in a sexually transmitted disease clinic and were followed for clinical and microbiologic responses at 1 to 2 weeks and 4 to 6 weeks posttreatment. Women had a later follow-up visit to note interim pregnancy or underwent hysterosalpingography for fertility outcome assessment. The short-term clinical response rates were 70% for ampicillin-sulbactam and 72% for cefoxitin-doxycycline (P = 0.47). Among Chlamydia trachomatis-infected women treated with ampicillin-sulbactam, three had microbiologic relapse. The post-PID tubal obstruction rates were similar in the two groups: 18% for ampicillin-sulbactam and 33% for cefoxitin-doxycycline (P = 0.31). Neither regimen was highly effective as a therapy for acute PID. These data strongly argue that primary prevention must be the goal for a reduction of PID morbidity and show that improved therapy for the treatment of PID in the ambulatory setting is needed.

Acute Disease↗

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for major head and neck surgery in cancer patients: sulbactam-ampicillin versus clindamycin-amikacin.

A total of 99 patients with head and neck cancer who were to undergo surgery were randomized in a prospective comparative study of sulbactam-ampicillin (1:2 ratio; four doses of 3 g of ampicillin and 1.5 g of sulbactam intravenously [i.v.] every 6 h) versus clindamycin (four doses of 600 mg i.v. every 6 h)-amikacin (two doses of 500 mg i.v. every 12 h) as prophylaxis starting at the induction of anesthesia. The two groups of evaluable patients (43 in the clindamycin-amikacin treatment group and 42 in the sulbactam-ampicillin treatment group) were comparable as far as age (mean, 57 years; range, 21 to 84 years), sex ratio (71 males, 28 females), weight (mean, 66 kg; range, 40 to 69 kg), indication for surgery (first surgery, 48 patients; recurrence, 37 patients), previous anticancer treatment (surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy), type of surgery, and stage of cancer. The overall infection rate (wound, bacteremia, and bronchopneumonia) within 20 days after surgery was 20 patients in each group. Wound infections occurred in 14 (33%) sulbactam-ampicillin-treated patients and 9 (21%) clindamycin-amikacin-treated patients (P = 0.19; not significant). The rates of bacteremia were 2 and 4%, respectively. The rates of bronchopneumonia were 14.3 and 23.2%, respectively (P was not significant). Most infections were polymicrobial, but strict anaerobes were recovered only from patients who received sulbactam-ampicillin. Antimicrobial treatment was required within 20 days after surgery for 42% of the sulbactam-ampicillin-treated patients and 44% of the clindamycin-amikacin-treated patients. By comparison with previous studies, we observed a decreased efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing surgery because of the increased proportion of patients who were at very high risk for infection (extensive excision and plastic reconstruction in patients with recurrent stage III and IV cancers) and because of the longer duration of surgery.

Adult↗

Use of a predictor panel to evaluate susceptibility testing methods for ampicillin-sulbactam.

A predictor panel of clinical isolates that produce a variety of types and amounts of beta-lactamases was used to assess the accuracies of a variety of susceptibility tests for ampicillin-sulbactam. Combinations of ampicillin-sulbactam in ratios of 1:1 and 2:1 and with sulbactam held constant at concentrations of 4 and 8 micrograms/ml were examined in dilution tests performed in agar and broth. In addition, disks containing 10/10, 20/10, 20/20, and 20/30 micrograms of ampicillin-sulbactam were examined in diffusion tests. The results indicated that the MICs obtained in broth microdilution tests performed with each of the four combinations differed, on average, less than twofold. Of the disks tested, the 20/10-micrograms ampicillin-sulbactam disk provided the best separation between susceptible and resistant strains when interpretive criteria for resistance was a zone size of < or = 16 mm and that for susceptibility was a zone size of > or = 21 mm. This disk also gave the highest overall agreement with MICs, regardless of the combination used in the broth microdilution test. Discrepancies between agar and broth microdilution MICs were greater than twofold, on average, and this necessitated recommendation of separate criteria for the two methods. Thus, a predictor panel was very useful in identifying the parameters of susceptibility tests that were most accurate in identifying strains that were susceptible and resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam.

Ampicillin↗

Resistance to cefoperazone-sulbactam in Klebsiella pneumoniae: evidence for enhanced resistance resulting from the coexistence of two different resistance mechanisms.

We investigated the in vitro activity and the in vivo efficacy of the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination cefoperazone-sulbactam against an isogenic series of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. Both cefoperazone and cefoperazone-sulbactam were active in vitro against a susceptible clinical strain, and the combination was highly effective in the treatment of rat intra-abdominal abscesses. Loss of expression of a 39-kDa outer membrane protein resulted in at least a fourfold increase in the MICs of cefoperazone and cefoperazone-sulbactam but did not appreciably affect the in vivo efficacy of either regimen. Introduction of plasmid RP4, which encodes the TEM-2 beta-lactamase, into the susceptible strain resulted in the loss of in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy for cefoperazone. The in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against this strain was diminished, but the antibiotic combination remained highly active in vivo. Introduction of RP4 into the strain lacking the 39-kDa outer membrane protein resulted in a fourfold increase in the in vitro MIC of cefoperazone-sulbactam in comparison with the beta-lactamase-producing susceptible strain and resulted in a loss of in vivo efficacy against infections caused by this strain. These results suggest that the combination of different resistance mechanisms, neither of which alone results in substantially diminished cefoperazone-sulbactam efficacy in vivo, can cause in vivo resistance to the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination in K. pneumoniae.

Abscess↗

Comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam with vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecalis.

Increasing antibiotic resistance in the enterococci, including the capacity for beta-lactamase production and the development of high-level aminoglycoside resistance, has complicated the treatment of serious enterococcal infections, which often require synergistic antibiotic combinations for cure. We utilized the rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis to investigate the effects of various antibiotics, alone and in combination, against a multiply antibiotic-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecalis. Female New Zealand White rabbits were infected with either a beta-lactamase-producing, gentamicin-resistant isolate of E. faecalis or a non-beta-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-susceptible isolate, and the mean log10 CFU per gram of vegetation were determined. The most active agents were low-dose ampicillin-sulbactam (200 mg/kg of body weight per day), high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam (400 mg/kg of body weight per day), and vancomycin (150 mg/kg of body weight per day), which reduced the titers of bacteria by 2.27, 2.76, and 2.85 log10 (CFU/g, respectively, compared with controls. While ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin were equally efficacious in reducing titers of bacteria in vegetations, no animals were cured (defined as < 2 log10 CFU/g of vegetation) by either agent, whether treatment was continued for 3 or 7 days. The addition of gentamicin was not associated with increased killing in rabbits infected with the aminoglycoside-resistant isolate. Both high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin regimens demonstrated significant, continued reduction in bacterial titers with the longer periods of treatment (P < or = 0.05); 7-day treatment with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam produced a greater reduction in bacterial titers in vegetation than 7-day treatment with vancomycin (P < or = 0.05). We conclude that ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin are equally effective in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant E. faecalis. The optimum therapy for such infections in humans is not known.

Ampicillin↗

Comparative activities of clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam against clinically important beta-lactamases.

Clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam are inhibitors of a variety of plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. However, inhibition data for these three inhibitors with a wide range of different plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases have not yet been compared under the same experimental conditions. A number of groups have inferred that clavulanic acid inhibits extended-spectrum TEM and SHV beta-lactamases, but inhibition data have rarely been published. In this study, the 50% inhibitory concentrations of these three beta-lactamase inhibitors for 35 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases have been determined. Of these 35 beta-lactamases, 20 were extended-spectrum TEM- or SHV-derived beta-lactamases. The other 15 enzymes were conventional-spectrum beta-lactamases such as TEM-1 and SHV-1. Clavulanic acid was a more potent inhibitor than sulbactam for 32 of the 35 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases tested. In particular, clavulanic acid was 60 and 580 times more potent than sulbactam against TEM-1 and SHV-1, respectively, currently the two most clinically prevalent gram-negative plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. Statistical analysis of the data of the 50% inhibitory concentrations showed that clavulanic acid was 20 times more active overall than sulbactam against the conventional-spectrum enzymes. In addition, clavulanic acid was 14 times more potent than sulbactam at inhibiting the extended-spectrum enzymes. Tazobactam also showed significantly greater activity than sulbactam against the two groups of beta-lactamases. There were no significant differences between the overall activities of tazobactam and clavulanic acid against the extended-spectrum TEM and SHV enzymes and conventional-spectrum enzymes, although differences in their inhibition profiles were observed.

Bacteria↗

Molecular aspects of high-level resistance to sulbactam-cefoperazone in Klebsiella oxytoca clinical isolates.

Nine Klebsiella oxytoca strains which demonstrated resistance to the combination of sulbactam and cefoperazone were isolated from geographically separate hospitals in Japan in 1995. Among them, K. oxytoca SB23 showed high-level resistance to sulbactam-cefoperazone (MIC > 128 micrograms/ml) and aztreonam (MIC, 128 micrograms/ml). The sulbactam-cefoperazone resistance was not transferred from strain SB23 to Escherichia coli CSH2 by conjugation, beta-Lactamase RbiA, produced by strain SB23, was purified, and the molecular mass was estimated to be 29 kDa by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Kinetic parameters for RbiA revealed that cefoperazone and aztreonam were hydrolyzed efficiently by this enzyme. Moreover, ceftazidime and imipenem were also hydrolyzed weakly by RbiA, although strain SB23 did not show any resistance to these agents. Clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam failed to block the hydrolysis of cefoperazone by RbiA. The structural gene of RbiA (blaRBI) was cloned and sequenced, and the deduced amino acid sequence of RbiA demonstrated high-level similarities to those of the beta-lactamases found in K. oxytoca D488, E23004, and plasmid-mediated MEN-1, which have been classified into Bush functional group 2be. Although RbiA demonstrates high-level molecular similarity to the enzymes in group 2be, from an enzymological point of view, this enzyme might be differentiated from the enzymes in that group. Hybridization analysis revealed that beta-lactamase genes highly similar to blaRBI were generally encoded on the chromosome of the sulbactam-cefoperazone-resistant clinical isolates of K. oxytoca tested in the study, despite their different derivations. This observation suggests that sulbactam-cefoperazone-resistant A. oxytoca strains which produce RbiA-type beta-lactamases have been proliferating in many hospitals in Japan.

Amino Acid Sequence↗