Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Skin Tests”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Systemic reactions to allergy skin tests.

BACKGROUND: Skin testing is a common diagnostic tool in allergy. It is considered a safe procedure, although systemic reactions have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To identify the systemic reaction rates of allergy skin tests and to determine the clinical outcome of such reactions. METHOD: This retrospective study used a computerized database at the Mayo Clinic to identify patients who developed systemic reactions to skin tests. Altogether 497,656 skin tests were performed on 18,311 patients from January 1992 to June 1997. Skin puncture tests were performed on 16,505 patients. Skin puncture and intradermal skin tests were performed on 1,806 patients. Systemic reactions were evaluated and treated by physicians. RESULTS: There were 6 systemic reactions, an overall rate of 33 systemic reactions per 100,000 skin tests. All six patients had asthma. The systemic reaction rates for latex skin testing was 152 or 228 reactions per 100,000 latex skin tests, to penicillin and antibiotics 72 reactions per 100,000 penicillin and antibiotics skin tests, and to aeroallergens 15 or 23 reactions per 100,000 aeroallergen skin tests. The systemic reaction rate for skin puncture test was 30 reactions per 100,000 skin puncture tests, for skin puncture and intradermal skin tests, the rate was 55 reactions per 100,000 skin puncture and intradermal skin tests. All 6 patients were treated and dismissed within 1 hour after treatment. CONCLUSION: The systemic reaction rate to skin tests was very low. Systemic reactions were mild and all patients recovered fully within 1 hour.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.

The sensitivity and precision of rotation, prick and puncture methods of using the Duotip-Test for epicutaneous allergy skin testing were evaluated. Forty-one volunteers who had not taken any antihistamines within the previous two weeks were recruited. The mean age was 21.6 years (range 18 to 25 years). Histamine hydrochloride 1 mg/ml and 50% glycerol saline were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Each method of testing was performed in triplicate on the volar surface of both forearms. Wheal and flare were measured 15 minutes later. Rotation, prick and puncture methods produced histamine mean wheal diameter +/- standard deviation of 6.61 +/- 0.87 mm, 3.86 +/- 1.03 mm, and 3.00 +/- 0.65 mm, respectively (p < 0.01). The coefficient of variation of rotation method was 13.13%. It was the only method that gave coefficient of variation lower than 20%. False negative and false positive proportions of rotation method using a 4 mm criterion for positive reaction were 1.5% and 0.75%, respectively. Rotation method was well accepted by the volunteers although it was ranked highest in pain. We concluded that the rotation method of using Duotip-Test is a highly reliable technique for skin testing.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

The Hymenoptera venom study. II: Skin test results and safety of venom skin testing.

Data are summarized in this Hymenoptera venom study (HVS) article on the safety of skin testing with venom extracts. Of the 3236 subjects studied, 89% had experienced an historical sting systemic reaction (SSR). Seventy-four percent of all subjects and 76% of subjects who had experienced an historical SSR had a positive skin test to at least one venom. More subjects tested positive to yellow jacket venom (51.8%) than to any other venom. There were no significant differences of the wheal and erythema sizes associated with different venoms or different historical sting reactions. Forty-five percent of subjects with positive venom skin tests (VST) were positive to wasp, and 89% of these subjects were also positive to at least one of the following venoms: yellow jacket, yellow hornet, or white-faced hornet. Sixty-four of the 3236 subjects studied (2%) had a systemic reaction (SR) during VST; 13 of the SRs (0.4%) were severe. Thirteen of 64 adverse reactions (20%) were possibly vasovagal, and six other subjects (9%) demonstrated no symptoms of immediate-type hypersensitivity. Thus, 45 (1.4%) of the 3236 subjects tested had an SR that was considered to be a reaction of hypersensitivity, of which eight reactions (0.25%) were severe. Allergic SRs are associated with VST but are unusual and are rarely severe.

Animals↗
PubMed1980

Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity skin test responses to the Dirofilaria immitis filarial skin test (Sawada) antigen in Wuchereria bancrofti filariasis.

In order to assess the immunodiagnostic utility of FST skin test antigen purified from Dirofilaria immitis, skin test responses were analyzed in 177 inhabitants of a South Pacific island hyperendemic for Wuchereria bancrofti filariasis. Although the distribution of immediate hypersensitivity skin test responses was similar to those found in other filarial endemic populations, individual immediate skin test reactions lacked the sensitivity and specificity to identify those with microfilaremia or those with any clinical or parasitologic evidence of filarial disease. Delayed hypersensitivity type skin test reactions were elicited by the antigen in 60% of people but again these delayed cutaneous reactions did not correlate with the presence or absence of stigmata of filariasis. These findings document the limitation of this antigen preparation in the immunodiagnosis of filariasis in residents of an endemic area.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Evaluation of the Multi-Test device for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.

Test-to-test reproducibility, user variability, and the effect of positive reactions on adjacent negative sites were evaluated for the Multi-Test skin testing device. Twenty-five subjects had skin tests with 24 histamine (1 mg/ml), four glycerosaline controls, and four "dry" controls on two testings 7 days apart. To assess reproducibility from large and smaller histamine reactions and/or their effect on adjacent negative controls, 10 of the 25 subjects were retested once with the same testing format, but histamine at 10 mg/ml was substituted. To determine whether large allergen reactions affect adjacent negative controls differently than histamine reactions, 24 additional patients were retested on arms and back with negative controls adjacent to allergens to which they had prior 3+ to 4+ skin test reactions. Conclusions from 2688 skin tests on 49 patients are as follows: large (mean > 10 mm) histamine reactions reproduced better than smaller (mean < 7 mm) responses--coefficients of variation were 12.3 and 21.4 respectively. A 14% user variability occurred when comparing mean wheal sizes from histamine produced by each nurse and 1.2% when comparing their coefficients of variation. Neither small histamine reactions nor large reactions from histamine and allergens affected adjacent negative controls. We conclude that Multi-Test is a highly reliable skin testing technique that provides good reproducibility of results and low user variability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

A comparison of dual skin test with mycobacterial antigens and tuberculin skin test alone in estimating prevalence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection from population surveys.

SETTING: City of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To compare estimates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection prevalence obtained using traditional tuberculin skin test (TST) criteria and dual skin test (DST) data. METHODS: A total of 1070 schoolchildren received DST with tuberculin and four environmental mycobacteria sensitins. Responses were classified as sensitin-dominant, tuberculin-dominant or non-dominant. Positive predictive values (PPV) were defined using 'narrow' and 'wide' standards based on DST responses. These predictive values were derived for each category of tuberculin indurations, and were used to calculate the prevalence estimates. RESULTS: Using DST data, the estimates of M. tuberculosis prevalence for scar-negative children were 7.4% (M. avium) and 7.8% (M. scrofulaceum) using the 'narrow' standard, and 16.9% (M. avium) and 15.2% (M. scrofulaceum) using the 'wide' standard. The percentage with TST > or =10 mm was 11.5%. Scar-positive children had higher estimates using both the 10 mm cut-off and DST data. CONCLUSION: In settings with a relatively low prevalence of M. tuberculosis infection and high cross-reactivity with environmental mycobacteria, DST can help to assess the validity of traditional thresholds for estimating the prevalence of M. tuberculosis infection. DST data with environmental antigens and tuberculin do not distinguish BCG-induced cross-reactivity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Type III allergy skin testing. Position statement for EAACI Subcommittee on Skin Tests and Allergen Standardization.

Immune-complex-mediated hypersensitivity has been implicated in a small number of allergic respiratory conditions. These include EAA and ABPA. In addition, there is some evidence of type IV hypersensitivity in EAA and BFL, together with activation of complement via the alternative pathway (4, 8, 26). Positive immediate skin tests are now usually regarded as an essential criterion for the diagnosis of ABPA. These reflect the presence of antigen-specific IgE, but this test is not specific for ABPA, as other atopic subjects may also be sensitized to A. fumigatus without any evidence of the parenchymal features that are required to diagnose ABPA. For FL, skin tests with currently available antigens show poor discrimination between affected patients and exposed but healthy individuals. There is little evidence that vascular deposition of immune complexes in the skin contributes to the delayed skin responses in EAA, and skin tests in FL are not specific for type III hypersensitivity. Further refinement of methodology and antigen extracts may improve the specificity of skin tests in FL, but in many cases the aetiology of EAA is multifactorial and the true causative antigens may not have been identified. Therefore, the diagnosis of EAA remains based on history and clinical findings, supported by the presence of precipitins, and sometimes by bronchial biopsy and lavage appearances (25).

Allergens↗
PubMed1991

Anaphylaxis to muscle-relaxant drugs: study of cross-reactivity by skin tests.

Intradermal skin tests (two dilutions) carried out systematically with 5 muscle-relaxant drugs were used to study the cross-reactivity between these drugs in 131 patients who had suffered from anaphylaxis. The skin tests were positive for at least 2 drugs in 65.6% of the cases. We observed a significant concordance (positive-positive or negative-negative skin tests) between pancuronium and vecuronium (p less than 0.01) and a significant correlation between the skin test diameters obtained with these 2 drugs (p less than 0.02 for wheals and p less than 0.01 for flares). Conversely, the lack of concordance between pancuronium and suxamethonium was significant (p less than 0.05). When comparing all the concordances obtained with each pair of drugs, it appeared that the concordance between pancuronium and vecuronium was significantly higher than all others. For other concordances, 2 main factors seemed to play a role: the N+ of the ammonium ions included in a ring as in pancuronium and the presence of a 'choline-like' side chain as in suxamethonium. But there was no significant correlation between skin test diameters. Altogether, these results suggest that in vivo there is no 'true' cross-reactivity between the drugs except frequently between pancuronium and vecuronium. In all other cases, the patients have probably specific IgE antibodies for each drug, all these antibodies being able to recognize the ammonium determinant; this common property may be insufficient to induce a clinical allergy.

Adolescent↗