Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Semantic Differential”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1979

Psychological aspects of dialysis: a semantic differential study.

As a consequence of technological advances over the last 15 years, patients suffering from terminal renal failure are now being kept alive for considerable periods of time, either by renal haemodialysis or, where appropriate and possible, by renal transplantation. The former necessarily imposes restrictions on the patients' lives which may be manifest at various levels. The basic aim of the study to be reported was to conduct an exploratory investigation of the psychological impact of dialysis on such patients, together with some of the factors that may influence their reactions to it. Using a Semantic Differential technique, 21 patients on dialysis were compared with a group of 21 healthy control subjects in terms of the personal meaning of selected concepts. Both groups were then subdivided on the basis of age, sex and, in the case of the patients, in terms of length of time on dialysis. Subgroup comparisons were then conducted. The findings suggest various hypotheses which have both theoretical and clinical implications.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Nurses' attitudes towards people with dementia: the semantic differential technique.

One important aspect of the nurse-patient relationship is nurses' attitudes towards their patients. Nurses' attitudes towards people with dementia have been studied from a wide range of approaches, but few authors have focused on the structure of these attitudes. This study aimed to identify a structure in licensed practical nurses' attitudes towards people with dementia. Twenty-one group dwelling units for people with dementia at 11 nursing homes participated in the study. A total of 1577 assessments of 178 patients were sent out to 181 respondents and 1237 answers were returned. The semantic differential technique was used. The scale had 57 bipolar pairs of adjectives that estimate an unknown number of dimensions of nurses' attitudes towards an identified patient. The assessments were analysed using entropy-based measures of association combined with structural plots. The analysis revealed four dimensions, which related to licensed practical nurses' opinions of the patients: an ethical and aesthetic dimension; an ability to understand; an ability to experience; and an ability for social interaction. The results of the study indicated that, on the positive to negative attitude continuum, the nurses' attitudes fell at the positive to neutral end. This is an important finding owing to the personhood perspective, from which it is reasonable to assume that, with a more positive attitude to people with dementia, the prerequisites for person-centred care will improve.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Judging the other: psychiatric nurses' attitudes towards identified inpatients as measured by the semantic differential technique.

Nurses' attitudes towards psychiatric patients can be expressed in terms of either a symptom-oriented approach or a personhood-focused approach where the latter is characterized by the ambition to establish a genuine and lasting relationship, while the former places the emphasis on correcting 'defective' patient behaviour. To study whether previous typologies found in a qualitative in-depth interview study exist in a larger quantitative investigation and, if so, to identify and describe a structure for the nurses' attitudes connected to each of the identified typologies. Six psychiatric group dwellings and six acute psychiatric hospital wards participated in the study. In all, 2700 assessments of 163 patients were sent out to 160 respondents and 2436 answers were returned, that is, the external dropout rate was 9.8%. The semantic differential technique was used. This is a method for quantifying the meaning that is attached to an identified phenomenon through series of bipolar pairs of adjectives. The scale has 57 bipolar pairs of adjectives, which estimates an unknown number of dimensions of nurses' attitudes towards an identified patient. The respondents' answers were analysed through entropy-based measures of association combined with structural plots. The analysis revealed that the four typologies existed as a delimited group, especially the groups of 'good' and 'evil' patients, while the 'crazy' and 'invisible' patients existed in a more blurred form. The analysis also revealed that the two groups, 'good' and 'evil', were connected to the nurses' ethical and aesthetic attitude structure, while the 'crazy' patients were linked to the cognitive structure and the 'invisible' patients to the empathetic structure. The study indicates that the two typologies, 'good' and 'evil', could be seen as each other's antithesis and, together with the other two typologies, 'crazy' and 'invisible', they touched upon a structure of the nurses' attitudes that was closely connected to a negative view of the patient except in one case -'the good' patients, which was probably based on his/her exterior symptoms.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Attitudes to recertification measured over time using a validated semantic differential scale.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to measure the acceptability of the Royal New Zealand College of GPs' Recertification programme to the GPs in the programme. DESIGN: Questionnaire study of a stratified random sample of members of the RNZCGP. METHOD: A semantic differential attitude scale was developed and validated. The scale was administered to 300 GPs before the Recertification programme began and repeated with 100 of these GPs 18 months later. After 3 years of the programme the questionnaire was administered to the original 300 GPs. RESULTS: Baseline data showed reasonable acceptance of the concept of recertification but by 18 months there was a significant deterioration in the way the programme was perceived and this did not change over 3 years. Many GPs were not convinced of the value of the programme.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗