SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SPIRONOLACTONE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1985

Effect of spironolactone on the renal clearance of digoxin in dogs.

The acute effect of i.v. spironolactone dissolved in ethanol on renal digoxin clearance was studied in 10 dogs. All dogs received i.v. digoxin (0.02 micrograms/kg/min) and 0.9% saline (30 ml/kg of bolus and 0.1 ml/kg/min for maintenance) throughout the study. After 2 hr of equilibration, four 15-min urine collections were made. The dogs then received, over 1 hr, a loading infusion of 4 mg/kg of spironolactone in ethanol (group 1, N = 6) or ethanol alone (group 2, N = 4). Thereafter the infusion was maintained at one-tenth the initial rate for eight 15-min periods. Three additional control dogs received ethanol plus spironolactone without digoxin. Digoxin radioimmunoassay of plasma and urine from these control animals did not reveal any significant cross-reactivity between spironolactone and the antibody of the digoxin radioimmunoassay. The digoxin clearance (CDIG) and ratio of CDIG to inulin clearance (CDIG/CIN) increased insignificantly with ethanol alone, but were respectively reduced by 21 and 28% with spironolactone (P less than .05). The reductions of CDIG and CDIG/CIN were observed immediately after the spironolactone loading infusion and were associated with a sudden rise in plasma digoxin. The changes in digoxin handling with spironolactone appeared to be temporally dissociated from the antimineralocorticoid activity of spironolactone. We conclude that spironolactone inhibits renal CDIG by a mechanism that may be independent of its antimineralocorticoid activity.

Aldosterone↗

PubMed1983

Randomized comparative study of efficacy of furosemide versus spironolactone in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Relationship between the diuretic response and the activity of the renin-aldosterone system.

Loop and distal diuretics are the basic drugs for the treatment of ascites. Although pharmacologic studies indicate that the natriuretic potency of loop diuretics is much greater than that of distal diuretics, there are no studies comparing the efficacy of these drugs in cirrhosis. Forty nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites and avid sodium retention were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 contained 21 patients treated with furosemide; group 2 contained 19 patients treated with spironolactone. The initial doses were 80 and 150 mg/day, respectively. These doses were increased to 160 and 300 mg/day, respectively, if there was no response. Cases not responding to furosemide and spironolactone were later treated with spironolactone and furosemide, respectively. In group 1, 11 of the 21 patients responded to furosemide, while in group 2, 18 of the 19 patients responded to spironolactone (p less than 0.01). Of the 10 patients in group 1 not responding to furosemide, 9 responded later to spironolactone. The diuretic response to furosemide and spironolactone was related to the activity of the renin-aldosterone system. Patients with higher renin and aldosterone did not respond to furosemide and required 300 mg/day of spironolactone to achieve a diuretic response. These results indicate that (a) at the dosages used in the study, spironolactone is more effective than furosemide in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites, and (b) the activity of the renin-aldosterone system influences the diuretic response to furosemide and spironolactone in these patients.

Ascites↗

PubMed2004

Spironolactone impairs endothelial function and heart rate variability in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Aldosterone blockade has followed in the footsteps of ACE inhibition in reducing mortality in patients with heart failure. This is associated with its beneficial effects on endothelial function and heart rate variability. Diabetes is another area, where angiotensin II withdrawal has proven to be of particular value. We postulated that aldosterone blockade with spironolactone might also have beneficial effects on the prognostic markers of endothelial function and heart rate variability in diabetic patients. METHODS: We assessed endothelial function by forearm venous occlusion plethysmography in 42 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after 1 month of treatment with spironolactone or placebo allocated in a randomised double-blind trial. Of the 42 patients, 20 were on ACE inhibitor therapy. We also assessed heart rate variability, HbA1c and plasma angiotensin II levels at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, spironolactone decreased forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine by 44.56+/-14.56% (p=0.003) in the group as a whole and by 57.61+/-15.56% (p<0.001) in the 20 patients on ACE inhibition. Spironolactone also worsened heart rate variability parameters, with root mean squared standard deviation decreased by 1.99+/-0.93 ms (p=0.03), low-frequency normalised power increased by 2.00+/-0.91 normalised units (nu) (p=0.03), high-frequency normalised power decreased by 1.98+/-0.94 nu (p=0.04) and the low frequency : high frequency ratio increased by 0.40+/-0.19 (p=0.04). HbA1c and angiotensin II increased during treatment with spironolactone by 0.26+/-0.07% (p=0.001) and 8.12+/-1.94 pg/ml (p=0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Spironolactone worsened endothelial function and heart rate variability in patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings are possibly due to the worsening of glycaemic control and increase in plasma angiotensin II that were seen with spironolactone treatment. Thus the prescription of spironolactone to diabetic patients without heart failure does not seem to be justified.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Long-term safety of spironolactone in acne: results of an 8-year followup study.

BACKGROUND: Spironolactone has been used for over 20 years as an antiandrogen in the treatment of acne and hirsutism. No long-term studies of the safety of spironolactone used in this manner have been published. We present a study of the long-term safety and tolerance of spironolactone in 91 women with acne who were followed for up to 8 years. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was sent to 210 patients, and a comparison chart review of all patients to whom the survey was sent was made. RESULTS: Ninety-one completed surveys were analyzed, comprising 506 person-years of followup and 200 person-years of spironolactone exposure. Mean treatment length was 28.5 months (range = 0.5-122 months). During the 8-year followup period, there were no cases of serious illness attributable to spironolactone use. Side effects were present in 59% and resulted in cessation of the drug in 15%. Diuretic effect and menstrual irregularities were the most common adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: After 200 person-years of exposure to spironolactone and 506 person-years of followup over 8 years, no serious illnesses thought to be attributed to spironolactone were reported. The long-term use of spironolactone in the treatment of acne in women appears to be safe. Side effects, however, are common, although not usually a cause for stopping the drug.

Acne Vulgaris↗

PubMed2006

Are beta-blockers needed in patients receiving spironolactone for severe chronic heart failure? An analysis of the COPERNICUS study.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of beta-blockers and aldosterone receptor antagonists are now well established in patients with severe systolic chronic heart failure (CHF). However, it is unclear whether beta-blockers are able to provide additional benefit in patients already receiving aldosterone antagonists. We therefore examined this question in the COPERNICUS study of 2289 patients with severe CHF receiving the beta1-beta2/alpha1 blocker carvedilol compared with placebo. METHODS: Patients were divided post hoc into subgroups according to whether they were receiving spironolactone (n = 445) or not (n = 1844) at baseline. Consistency of the effect of carvedilol versus placebo was examined for these subgroups with respect to the predefined end points of all-cause mortality, death or CHF-related hospitalizations, death or cardiovascular hospitalizations, and death or all-cause hospitalizations. RESULTS: The beneficial effect of carvedilol was similar among patients who were or were not receiving spironolactone for each of the 4 efficacy measures. For all-cause mortality, the Cox model hazard ratio for carvedilol compared with placebo was 0.65 (95% CI 0.36-1.15) in patients receiving spironolactone and 0.65 (0.51-0.83) in patients not receiving spironolactone. Hazard ratios for death or all-cause hospitalization were 0.76 (0.55-1.05) versus 0.76 (0.66-0.88); for death or cardiovascular hospitalization, 0.61 (0.42-0.89) versus 0.75 (0.64-0.88); and for death or CHF hospitalization, 0.63 (0.43-0.94) versus 0.70 (0.59-0.84), in patients receiving and not receiving spironolactone, respectively. The safety and tolerability of treatment with carvedilol were also similar, regardless of background spironolactone. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol remained clinically efficacious in the COPERNICUS study of patients with severe CHF when added to background spironolactone in patients who were practically all receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (or angiotensin II antagonist) therapy. Therefore, the use of spironolactone in patients with severe CHF does not obviate the necessity of additional treatment that interferes with the adverse effects of sympathetic activation, specifically beta-blockade.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

A mammalian steroid action inhibitor spironolactone retards plant growth by inhibition of brassinosteroid action and induces light-induced gene expression in the dark.

We screened steroid derivatives and found that spironolactone, an inhibitor of both 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17beta-HSD) and aldosterone receptor, is an inhibitor of phytohormone brassinosteroid (BR) action in plants. Under both dark and light growing conditions, spironolactone induced morphological changes in Arabidopsis, characteristic of brassinosteroid-deficient mutants. Spironolactone-treated plants were also nearly restored to the wild-type phenotype by treatment with additional BRs. In the spironolactone-treated Arabidopsis, the CPD gene in the BR biosynthesis pathway was up-regulated, probably due to feedback regulation caused by BR-deficiency. Spironolactone-treated tobacco plants grown in the dark showed expression of light-regulated genes as was observed in the deficient mutant. These data suggest that spironolactone inhibits brassinosteroid action probably due to the blockage of biosynthesis and exerts its activity against plants. Thus, spironolactone, in conjunction with brassinosteroid-deficient mutants, can be used to clarify the function of BRs in plants and characterize mutants. The spironolactone action site was also investigated by feeding BR biosynthesis intermediates to Arabidopsis grown in the dark, and the results are discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide in the treatment of moderate ascites in nonazotemic cirrhosis. A randomized comparative study of efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The most rational treatment of moderate ascites is spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide. However, it is unknown which of these two treatment schedules is preferable. METHODS: One hundred nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with moderate ascites were randomly assigned to be treated with spironolactone and furosemide (Group 1: 50 patients) or with spironolactone alone (Group 2: 50 patients). If no response was obtained, the doses of diuretics were increased up to 400 mg/day of spironolactone and 160 mg/day of furosemide. In patients of group 2 not responding to 400 mg/day of spironolactone, furosemide was added. In cases with an excessive response, the dosage of diuretics was reduced. RESULTS: The response rate (98% in Group 1 vs. 94% in Group 2), the rapidity of ascites mobilization and the incidence of complications induced by diuretic therapy was similar in both groups. The need to reduce the diuretic dosage was significantly higher in Group 1 than Group 2 (68% vs. 34%; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of moderate ascites, spironolactone alone seems to be as safe and effective as spironolactone associated with furosemide. Since spironolactone alone requires less dose adjustment, it would be more suitable for treating ascites on an outpatient basis.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Spironolactone inhibits the transcardiac extraction of aldosterone in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the transcardiac extraction or spillover of aldosterone (ALDO) in normal subjects and in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Aldosterone promotes collagen synthesis and structural remodeling of target organs such as the heart. Spironolactone, an ALDO receptor antagonist, has recently been reported to reduce the mortality of patients with CHF; however, the effects of spironolactone on the transcardiac gradient of ALDO have not been clarified. METHODS: We measured plasma ALDO in the aortic root (AO) and coronary sinus (CS) in normal subjects and 113 consecutive CHF patients and also measured plasma procollagen type III aminoterminal peptide (PIIINP) in CS, a biochemical marker of myocardial fibrosis. RESULTS: Plasma ALDO was significantly lower in the CS than in the AO in normal subjects (n = 15; 61.2 +/- 9.3 vs. 83.1 +/- 11.8 pg/ml, p < 0.0001). In 96 CHF patients who did not receive spironolactone, plasma ALDO was significantly lower in the CS than in the AO (59.3 +/- 3.9 vs. 73.8 +/- 4.9 pg/ml, p < 0.0001). In contrast to the difference in these 96 patients, there was no significant difference in ALDO between the AO and CS in 17 patients who received spironolactone (127.4 +/- 20 vs. 124.0 +/- 19 pg/ml, p = 0.50). Stepwise multivariate analyses showed that spironolactone therapy had an independent and significant negative relationship with the transcardiac gradient of plasma ALDO in patients with CHF. In addition, significant positive correlations were seen between the transcardiac gradient of plasma ALDO and PIIINP (r = 0.565, p < 0.0001) and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.484, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that plasma ALDO is extracted through the heart in normal subjects and in CHF patients who do not receive spironolactone and that spironolactone inhibits the transcardiac extraction of ALDO in CHF patients, suggesting that spironolactone blocks the effects of ALDO on the failing heart in patients with CHF.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Beneficial neurohormonal profile of spironolactone in severe congestive heart failure: results from the RALES neurohormonal substudy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the effects of spironolactone on neurohormonal factors in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: In the Randomized ALdactone Evaluation Study (RALES), spironolactone, an aldosterone receptor antagonist, significantly reduced mortality in patients with severe CHF. However, the mechanism of action and neurohormonal impact of this therapy remain to be clarified. METHODS: The effects of spironolactone (25 mg/day; n = 54) or placebo (n = 53) on plasma concentrations of the N-terminal portion of atrial natriuretic factor (N-proANF), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), endothelin-1 (ET-1), norepinephrine (NE), angiotensin II (AII), and aldosterone were assessed in a subgroup of 107 patients (New York Heart Association functional class III to IV; mean ejection fraction 25%) at study entry and at three and six months. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo group, plasma levels of BNP (-23% at 3 and 6 months; p = 0.004 and p = 0.05, respectively) and N-proANF (-19% at 3 months, p = 0.03; -16% at 6 months, p = 0.11) were decreased after spironolactone treatment. Over time, spironolactone did not modify the plasma levels of NE and ET-1. Angiotensin II increased significantly in the spironolactone group at three and six months (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). As expected, a significant increase in aldosterone levels was observed over time in the spironolactone group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone administration in patients with CHF has opposite effects on circulating levels of natriuretic peptides (which decrease) and aldosterone and AII (which increase). The reduction in natriuretic peptides might be related to changes in left ventricular diastolic filling pressure and/or compliance, whereas the increase in AII and aldosterone probably reflects activated feedback mechanisms. Further studies are needed to link these changes to the beneficial effects on survival and to determine whether the addition of an AII antagonist could be useful in this setting.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Complications of inappropriate use of spironolactone in heart failure: when an old medicine spirals out of new guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the appropriateness and complications of the use of spironolactone for heart failure (HF) in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Spironolactone was reported by one prospective randomized trial to decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV HF. With this report (Randomized Spironolactone Evaluation Study [RALES] trial), we noted a marked increase in widespread use of spironolactone in patients with HF. Long-term outcome data with respect to safety and utilization of this medication in HF are not available. METHODS: To investigate the use of spironolactone for HF in a clinical setting, we analyzed the application of the RALES trial protocol to the care of 104 patients, whom we identified as being started on spironolactone for HF after prerelease of the RALES trial. RESULTS: We found broader use, less intensive follow-up, and increased complications with spironolactone treatment compared with the RALES trial. Cardiologists provided more appropriate care than did primary care providers. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that spironolactone is being used widely in HF without consideration of the NYHA class and ejection fraction, and without optimization of background treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. Clinical follow-up does not adhere to the RALES trial guidelines, resulting in higher complications. We conclude that long-term studies with further safety and efficacy data are needed.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Long-term therapy with spironolactone.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the duration of therapy with spironolactone in daily practice. METHOD: A retrospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with a first prescription for spironolactone between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1996 and at least one hospital discharge for CHF in the preceding year. RESULTS: 243 patients met the inclusion criteria and were followed until the end of data collection. The average starting dosage of spironolactone was 55 mg. 143 patients (58.8%) discontinued spironolactone therapy before the end of follow-up. 98 patients (40.8%) discontinued within 6 months of follow-up. Of the 137 patients (56.4%) who did use spironolactone and an ACE-inhibitor concomitantly, only 45 (32.8%) continued this combination until the end of follow-up. The remainder of the patients discontinued either the ACE-inhibitor (10.9%) or spironolactone (12.4%) or both (43.8%). CONCLUSION: While the reasons for discontinuation remain unclear, our data suggest that it is difficult to keep patients on both drugs. It is not certain whether these findings from past spironolactone use can be extrapolated to future use. Patients in the general population received higher average spironolactone dosages compared to the RALES study (55 mg vs. 26 mg), possibly resulting in more adverse effects and partly explaining the high discontinuation rate.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Effect of spironolactone and captopril on nitric oxide and S-nitrosothiol formation in kidney of L-NAME-treated rats.

Although angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are well-established drugs in the treatment of hypertension, they are not supposed to be sufficient in the inhibition of aldosterone formation. The present study analyzes the effect of aldosterone receptor antagonist, spironolactone and ACE inhibitor, captopril on nitric oxide (NO) and S-nitrosothiol formation in the kidney of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-treated rats. Male Wistar rats were divided into six groups: (1) controls, (2) L-NAME (40 mg/kg/day), (3) spironolactone (200 mg/kg/day), (4) captopril (100 mg/kg/day), (5) L-NAME+spironolactone, and (6) L-NAME+captopril. After 4 weeks, NO synthase (NOS) activity, protein expression of endothelial NOS, inducible NOS and concentration of thiol and S-nitrosothiol groups were determined in the kidney. Besides the increase in systolic blood pressure (by 32%) and the decrease in NOS activity (by 37%), L-NAME treatment lowered the concentration of thiols (by 32%) and S-nitrosothiols (by 36%) in the renal tissue. Simultaneous treatment with spironolactone preserved NOS activity and S-nitrosothiols on the control level, whereas captopril did not affect these parameters modified by L-NAME treatment. Moreover, spironolactone increased expression of endothelial NOS protein without affecting inducible NOS protein expression. In conclusion, both captopril and spironolactone prevented L-NAME-induced hypertension and the decline of the antioxidant potential of the kidney tissue. However, only spironolactone improved NOS activity which led to the S-nitrosothiols formation. Both NO itself and S-nitrosothiols may contribute to the preventive effect of spironolactone against development of L-NAME-induced hypertension.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed2003

Spironolactone inhibits production of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma, and has potential in the treatment of arthritis.

Evidence suggests that spironolactone, an aldosterone antagonist, has effects on many cell types independent of its binding to cytosolic mineralocorticoid receptors. We tested the effects of spironolactone on ex vivo-activated human blood leucocytes using gene expression analyses (GeneChip, 12,000 genes) and enzyme immunoassay for quantitating secreted pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of spironolactone as an anti-inflammatory drug 21 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or other arthritides were treated for up to 22 months with 1-3 mg/kg/day. Spironolactone, at in vivo attainable doses, markedly suppressed transcription of several proinflammatory cytokines and, accordingly, inhibited release of tumour necrosis factor, lymphotoxin, interferon-gamma, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin 6 (70-90% inhibition). Release of these cytokines was also suppressed when testing whole blood from RA patients receiving 50 mg spironolactone twice daily, indicating that pharmaceutical use of the drug may suppress the release of inflammatory cytokines. Spironolactone therapy was generally well tolerated, although treatment had to be stopped in two adults on concomitant methotrexate therapy. Sixteen patients (76%) responded favourably. American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR)20 or better was achieved in six of nine RA patients; four reached ACR70. Eight of nine JIA patients improved. In conclusion, spironolactone inhibits production of several proinflammatory cytokines considered to be of pathogenic importance in many immunoinflammatory diseases and shows positive effect in patients with chronic arthritis. Its effect as an anti-inflammatory drug should be explored, because prolonged spironolactone therapy is reasonably safe and economically attractive compared with many modern anti-inflammatory therapies.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

The safety of spironolactone treatment in patients with heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Spironolactone is increasingly being used in the treatment of heart failure. However, it has been associated with cases of hyperkalaemia. The common use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-2 receptor (AT2) antagonists in heart failure increases the risk of hyperkalaemia. OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk of spironolactone withdrawal, hyperkalaemia and severe hyperkalaemia in patients prescribed spironolactone together with either an ACE inhibitor or an AT2 antagonist. METHODS: Retrospective identification and analysis of patients co-prescribed an ACE inhibitor or an AT2 antagonist with spironolactone. Patients' records were linked to their biochemical results and the doses of spironolactone, ACE inhibitor and AT2 antagonists received by them. RESULTS: We found that a higher proportion of patients in our cohort stopped taking spironolactone compared with the Randomised Aldactone Evaluation Study and a higher proportion developed hyperkalaemia, a predicted adverse effect of spironolactone combination with an ACE inhibitor or an AT2 antagonist. Patients with diabetes mellitus and those with a haematocrit below 0.36, were more likely to develop hyperkalaemia than those without these traits. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone is a common cause of hyperkalaemia when used in combination with either an ACE inhibitor or an AT2 antagonist. This reinforces the need for care when extrapolating the results of clinical trials to daily clinical practice.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Treatment of familial male precocious puberty with spironolactone and testolactone.

Because the pubertal growth spurt in boys appears to be mediated by both androgens and estrogens, we hypothesized that blockade of both androgen action and estrogen synthesis would normalize the growth of boys with familial male precocious puberty. To test this hypothesis, we studied nine boys (age range, 3.3 to 7.7 years) during treatment with an antiandrogen (spironolactone) or an inhibitor of androgen-to-estrogen conversion (testolactone), followed by treatment with both agents. After six months of observation without treatment, the first four boys received spironolactone for six months, followed by spironolactone and testolactone. The next five boys received testolactone for six months, followed by spironolactone and testolactone. Neither spironolactone nor testolactone, given alone, was satisfactory as a treatment for this condition. However, a combination of spironolactone and testolactone, given for at least six months, restored both the growth rate and the rate of bone maturation to normal prepubertal levels and controlled acne, spontaneous erections, and aggressive behavior. The combined therapy was associated with a significantly lower growth rate than testolactone alone (P less than 0.05) and a significantly lower rate of bone maturation than spironolactone alone (P less than 0.05). No important adverse effects were observed during combined treatment. Six of the nine boys continued to receive the combined therapy for an additional 12 months and maintained normal prepubertal rates of growth and bone maturation. The mean predicted height (+/- SEM) increased progressively during the combined treatment although the difference between the pretreatment and post-treatment predictions was not significant (169.5 +/- 2.8 at the end of treatment vs. 166.2 +/- 4.5 cm before treatment; P = 0.29). We conclude that blockade of both androgen action and estrogen synthesis with the combination of spironolactone and testolactone is an effective short-term treatment for familial male precocious puberty. Further study will be required, however, to assess the long-term outcome in boys who receive this treatment.

Aggression↗

PubMed1999

The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Aldosterone is important in the pathophysiology of heart failure. In a doubleblind study, we enrolled 1663 patients who had severe heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of no more than 35 percent and who were being treated with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, a loop diuretic, and in most cases digoxin. A total of 822 patients were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of spironolactone daily, and 841 to receive placebo. The primary end point was death from all causes. RESULTS: The trial was discontinued early, after a mean follow-up period of 24 months, because an interim analysis determined that spironolactone was efficacious. There were 386 deaths in the placebo group (46 percent) and 284 in the spironolactone group (35 percent; relative risk of death, 0.70; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82; P<0.001). This 30 percent reduction in the risk of death among patients in the spironolactone group was attributed to a lower risk of both death from progressive heart failure and sudden death from cardiac causes. The frequency of hospitalization for worsening heart failure was 35 percent lower in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (relative risk of hospitalization, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.77; P<0.001). In addition, patients who received spironolactone had a significant improvement in the symptoms of heart failure, as assessed on the basis of the New York Heart Association functional class (P<0.001). Gynecomastia or breast pain was reported in 10 percent of men who were treated with spironolactone, as compared with 1 percent of men in the placebo group (P<0.001). The incidence of serious hyperkalemia was minimal in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of aldosterone receptors by spironolactone, in addition to standard therapy, substantially reduces the risk of both morbidity and death among patients with severe heart failure.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Spironolactone in type 2 diabetic nephropathy: Effects on proteinuria, blood pressure and renal function.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of addition of spironolactone to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition or angiotensin II (AngII) receptor antagonism on proteinuria, blood pressure (BP) and renal function in overt type 2 diabetic nephropathy. DESIGN: A placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial in patients from two outpatient clinics with a follow-up of 1 year. METHODS: Type 2 diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria, despite long-term use of an ACE inhibitor or AngII receptor blocker were allocated to spironolactone, 25-50 mg once daily (n = 29) or placebo (n = 30). Urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, BP and biochemical parameters were measured at regular intervals. RESULTS: Five patients of the spironolactone and one of the placebo group developed hyperkalemia and had to be excluded. Compared to other patients their baseline serum creatinine [161 (123-248) versus 88 (72-170) micromol/l] and potassium concentrations (4.7 +/- 0.3 versus 4.2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) were elevated (P < 0.001). Albuminuria decreased by 40.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.4-57.8%] and BP by 7 mmHg (2-12 mmHg)/3 mmHg (1-6 mmHg) with spironolactone, but did not change with placebo. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during the 1-year follow-up declined on average by 12.9 ml/min per 1.73 m (9.5-16.5 ml/min per 1.73 m) in the spironolactone and by 4.9 ml/min per 1.73 m (0.8-8.9 ml/min per 1.73 m) in the placebo group (P = 0.004). This decline was progressive in the placebo but leveled off in the spironolactone group. In the spironolactone group changes in albuminuria and GFR were correlated (r = 0.48, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Addition of spironolactone to an ACE inhibitor or AngII receptor blocker is associated with a marked and sustained antiproteinuric effect, which in part relates to the more pronounced reduction in GFR.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Striking increase of natriuresis by low-dose spironolactone in congestive heart failure only in combination with ACE inhibition: mechanistic evidence to support RALES.

BACKGROUND: A marked reduction of overall mortality in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) has been demonstrated by addition of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone to ACE inhibition. The aim of the present study was to examine a hypothesized interaction of spironolactone and ACE inhibitors in renal electrolyte and volume regulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Wistar rats with extensive myocardial infarction or sham operation were treated with either placebo, the ACE inhibitor trandolapril, low-dose spironolactone, or a combination of the 2. Twelve weeks after infarction, rats were housed in metabolic cages. Urinary volume and sodium excretion were significantly increased in CHF rats on a combined treatment with spironolactone and trandolapril (21.2+/-2.6 mL/d, 2489+/-320 mmol/d, mean+/-SD; P<0.05 versus other experimental groups) versus placebo-treated rats (16.7+/-5.6 mL/d, 1431+/-458 mmol/d),whereas these parameters were not affected in rats on either spironolactone (16.1+/-6.6 mL/d, 1153+/-273 mmol/d) or trandolapril alone (15.9+/-4.2 mL/d, 1392+/-294 mmol/d). The effects on natriuresis coincided with a significant reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in rats on trandolapril and spironolactone (10.8+/-8.2 mm Hg; P:<0.05 versus CHF placebo: 23.3+/-7.2 mm Hg; sham-operated rats: 5.1+/-0.9 mm Hg), whereas LVEDP remained elevated in rats treated with either compound alone. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we found an unexpected interaction of low-dose spironolactone and the ACE inhibitor trandolapril in experimental CHF leading to marked effects on renal electrolyte and volume regulation that were not apparent by treatment with either drug alone. These findings may explain the beneficial effects of spironolactone in CHF patients.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗