Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SPINAL DISEASES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Postoperative infections in interbody fusion for degenerative spinal disease.

UNLABELLED: Scant literature exists on the treatment of infection after interbody fusion. Some authors advocate removal of the interbody grafts. Salvage of the grafts was possible in 92.3% (12 of 13) of the infections in a series of 326 consecutive patients with degenerative spinal diseases treated by three surgeons. Posterior interbody fusion and posterolateral instrumented fusion was performed in 267 patients and anterior interbody fusion was done in 59 patients. Eight infections in the first group (3%) and six in the second group (10.1%) were identified. Mean followup was 18 months (range, 12-38 months). All infections were early, presenting at a mean of 18 days (range, 11-28 months). All but one infection were in the posterior wound and deep. A high number of risk factors were present in these patients. Initial treatment included wound debridement and broad spectrum antibiotics, until culture results indicated the final antibiotic regimen. Infection recurred as osteomyelitis in one patient with multiple previous surgeries and anterior/posterior fusion. This was treated with removal of the posterior instrumentation and the interbody graft and extensive anterior/posterior reconstruction. Clinical outcomes were good in 10 patients, fair in two and poor in one using the Stauffer-Coventry scale. One pseudarthrosis was identified in a patient with anterior interbody fusion at final followup. Salvage of the interbody graft and retaining the instrumentation was safe in most cases in the presented series and did not adversely affect outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV (case series). Please see the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

[Morphological diagnosis of spinal diseases. Current technical possibilities and challenges for the histological preparation of transpedicular biopsies].

The spine is the central component for the mobility of the human body. Both locally limited and diffuse pathologies of the spine are a challenge for the treating physician due to the difficult anatomy. The biopsy of a pathologically altered vertebral body is a fast and reliable basis for further therapy but until now this has not regularly been made use of as a diagnostic standard for spinal diseases, since the tissue gained was often microfractured because of the difficult anatomical position. Our own experience with transpedicular vertebral biopsies of 70 patients with different diseases is reported because of the considerable improvement in the biopsy technique and the methodical possibilities for processing the bony tissue. Methods which have proven particularly valuable are contact radiographs, embedding in plastic, careful decalcifying with EDTA and immunohistological procedures. In this way a definite diagnosis can be made in 97% of the cases. A close cooperation with the clinician carrying out the biopsy and a greater use of methods other than just fast decalcification is recommended.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1991

Clinical safety and efficacy of gadoteridol: a study in 411 patients with suspected intracranial and spinal disease.

In this phase III study, 411 adult patients with suspected intracranial or spinal disease underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before and after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol (gadolinium 1,4,7-tris [carboxymethyl]-10-[2'-hydroxypropyl]-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane+ ++). MR images were evaluated by a single unblinded reader at each of 27 sites; the diagnosis was confirmed with one of nine imaging or surgical procedures within 8 weeks before or after MR imaging. After injection, no clinically significant changes were noted in laboratory values, physical examination, or vital signs. Adverse clinical events possibly or probably associated with injection of gadoteridol were seen in 18 of 411 patients (4.4%); the most common were dysgeusia and mild nausea, and all abated without residual effects. MR images enhanced with gadoteridol in patients with confirmed disease provided more diagnostic information than unenhanced images in 128 of 175 brain examinations (73.1%) and 93 of 137 spinal examinations (67.9%). A change in diagnosis because of additional information from contrast-enhanced images was considered likely in 63 of 214 cranial and 54 of 161 spinal studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Assessment of gait and balance in patients with spinal diseases using the leg reposition test.

We devised a new leg reposition test, to assess gait and balance in patients with spinal diseases. This study included 344 patients who were scheduled to undergo spine surgery; 14 (4.1%) patients showed positive results. These 14 patients had worse gait status than leg reposition test-negative patients both preoperatively and postoperatively. The leg reposition test is a simple procedure, and requires no specialized equipment. This study showed that the leg reposition test has a strong relation with gait status, and therefore a high clinical significance regarding the assessment of preoperative gait and balance and prediction of postoperative gait status.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Commented glossary for rheumatic spinal diseases, based on pathology.

OBJECTIVES: To redefine and comment on terms on a pathological basis, in order to avoid the confusion due to the use of terms with different meanings, to standardise usage among clinicians, radiologists and pathologists, and to facilitate literature searches. METHODS: Within the Committee of Pathology of the European League against Rheumatism, a study group was set up to analyse the medical literature and common practice concerning the nomenclature of rheumatic spinal diseases. The group tried to amalgamate the main trends in the field, to reconcile etymology, historical background, morphology, and common practice. RESULTS: The group warns against use of the terms 'acquired hyperostosis syndrome', '(von) Bechterew's disease', 'Kümmel's disease', 'pseudospondylolisthesis', 'rheumatoid spondylitis', 'spondylarthropathy' in the sense of spondarthritis, and 'spondylosis'. It recommends intercorporal or interapophyseal rather than intervertebral (osteo) chondrosis, zygapophyseal diverticulum rather than cyst, disc hernia rather than prolapse, spondyloarthritis rather than spondyloarthropathy, marginal rather than anterior spondylitis, and discarthrosis. It proposes 'zygarthrosis' to designate zygapophyseal osteoarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the pathological basis of diseases and an understanding of the original definitions given by those who coined new terms make it possible to avoid most of the confusion arising from improper use of spinal terms.

Humans↗