Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SPIDER”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Colouration in crab spiders: substrate choice and prey attraction.

Australian crab spiders Thomisus spectabilis ambush pollinating insects, such as honeybees (Apis mellifera) on flowers, and can change their body colour between yellow and white. It is traditionally assumed that the spiders change their colour to match the flower colour, thus rendering them cryptic to insect prey. Here, we test this assumption combining state-of-the-art knowledge of bee vision and behavioural experiments. In the field, yellow spiders are only found on yellow daisies (Chrysanthemum frutescens), whereas white spiders are found on yellow and white daisies. These field patterns were confirmed in the laboratory. When given the choice between white and yellow daisies, yellow spiders preferred yellow daisies, whereas white spiders showed only a slight but non-significant preference for white flowers. Thus, T. spectabilis select background colours according to their own body colour. When viewed from a distance, bees use an achromatic signal produced by their green receptors for target detection. Through this visual channel, white spiders on white flowers, and yellow spiders on yellow flowers are virtually undetectable. From a closer distance of a few centimetres, when bees evaluate colour contrast, the combination of spider colour against different flower backgrounds affected the response of honeybees, but not in ways predicted by a classical crypsis/conspicuousness interpretation. Yellow spiders on yellow flowers are not perfectly matched when interpreted through the colour vision of a honeybee. Nevertheless, honeybees showed indifference to the presence of a spider, equally landing on vacant or spider-occupied flowers. Likewise, white spiders are poorly hidden on white flowers, as white spiders reflect ultraviolet light strongly, while white flowers do not. Surprisingly, bees are attracted to this contrast, and significantly more honeybees preferred white flowers occupied by white spiders. White spiders on yellow flowers produce the highest colour contrast and bees again preferred spider-occupied flowers. Yellow spiders on white flowers were the only pairing where bees rejected spider-occupied flowers, especially in cases where the contrast between the two was relatively strong. Thus, T. spectabilis select flower colours adaptively in a way that deceives honeybees, or at least does not deter them.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Developing a decision tree algorithm for the diagnosis of suspected spider bites.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a diagnostic algorithm (decision tree) to improve the ability to identify or predict medically important spider bites (funnel-web and redback spiders) from information about the circumstances and initial clinical effects of spider bites. METHODS: A dataset of definite spider bites with expert identification of all spiders was used from a previous Australia-wide prospective study. Spider bites were categorized as: big black spider (BBS), redback spider (RED) and other spider (OTH). Big black spider included funnel-web spiders (most medically significant), but also other spiders of similar appearance. Fifteen predictor variables were based on univariate analysis from previous studies and clinical experience. They included information about the circumstances and early clinical effects of bites. The data were analyzed using CART (Classification and Regression Trees), a 'decision tree' algorithm used to create a tree-like structure to describe a data set. RESULTS: Of 789 spider bites there were 49 (6.2%) bites by BBS, 68 (8.6%) bites by RED and 672 (85.2%) bites by OTH. A decision tree was developed that included six predictor variables (fang marks/bleeding; state/territory; local diaphoresis; month; time of day; and proximal or distal bite region). The decision tree accurately classified 47 out of the 49 (96%) BBS, and no funnel-web spiders were incorrectly classified (100% sensitivity). Two hundred and forty-four of 789 were classified as OTH and included no BBS. CONCLUSIONS: A decision tree based on a small amount of information about the circumstances and early clinical effects of spider bites safely predicted all funnel-web spider bites. Application of this algorithm would allow the early institution of appropriate treatment for funnel-web spider bites and the immediate discharge of 31% as other spider bites (reassurance only).

Algorithms↗
PubMed2001

Clinical effects of bites from formally identified spiders in tropical Northern Territory.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the types of spiders causing bites and the clinical effects of their bites in tropical Northern Territory (north of the town of Katherine). DESIGN: A prospective study of confirmed and suspected spider-bites and a retrospective analysis of data from a standardised, local database of spider- and snake-bites. Confirmed spider-bites were those in which there was a clear history of the bite, and the captured spider was identified by an arachnologist. SETTING: Emergency department of a teaching hospital. SUBJECTS AND DATA SOURCE: All subjects with confirmed or suspected spider-bite presenting to the Emergency Department or referred from August 1999 to August 2000, or identified from the database. RESULTS: Thirty-four subjects had a confirmed spider-bite from an identified spider: 25 in the prospective group and nine in the retrospective group. The spiders were Sparassidae (huntsman spider) (12 bites), Missulena pruinosa (northern mouse spider) (7), Latrodectus (widow spider) (4), Araneidae (orb-weaver) (4), Salticidae (jumping spider) (4), Nemesidae (trapdoor spider) (1), Conothele (1) and Selenocosmia (whistling spider) (1). Clinical effects were local pain in 97% (severe in 29%), redness in 47% and swelling in 24% of cases. Systemic effects occurred in three victims, two of whom were bitten by M. pruinosa. There were no cases of confirmed necrotic arachnidism. CONCLUSIONS: None of the spider-bites resulted in severe effects. Compared with data from other parts of Australia, different species were involved and latrodectism was uncommon. Our study highlighted the importance of correctly identifying the spider species.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Event-related potentials when identifying or color-naming threatening schematic stimuli in spider phobic and non-phobic individuals.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies revealed increased parietal late positive potentials (LPPs) in response to spider pictures in spider phobic individuals. This study searched for basic features of fear-relevant stimuli by investigating whether schematic spider images are sufficient to evoke differential behavioral as well as differential early and late ERP responses in spider phobic, social phobic (as a clinical control group), and non-phobic control participants. METHODS: Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of the processing of schematic spider and flower images were investigated while participants performed a color (emotional Stroop) and an object identification task. Stimuli were schematic pictures of spiders and flowers matched with respect to constituting visual elements. RESULTS: Consistent with previous studies using photographic spider pictures, spider phobic persons showed enhanced LPPs when identifying schematic spiders compared to schematic flowers. In addition, spider phobic individuals showed generally faster responses than the control groups. This effect was interpreted as evidence for an increased general behavioral hypervigilance in this anxiety disorder group. Furthermore, both phobic groups showed enhanced P100 amplitudes compared to controls, which was interpreted as evidence for an increased (cortical) hypervigilance for incoming stimuli in phobic patients in general. Finally, all groups showed faster identification of and larger N170 amplitudes in response to schematic spider than flower pictures. This may reflect either a general advantage for fear-relevant compared to neutral stimuli, or might be due to a higher level of expertise in processing schematic spiders as compared to the more artificially looking flower stimuli. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that schematic spiders are sufficient to prompt differential responses in spider-fearful and spider-non-fearful persons in late ERP components. Early ERP components, on the other hand, seem to be modified by anxiety status per se, which is consistent with recent theories on general hypervigilance in the anxiety disorder spectrum.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Clinical consequences of spider bites: recent advances in our understanding.

Spider bite continues to be a controversial subject worldwide and attribution of clinical effects to different spiders is problematic because of poor case definition and paucity of clinical evidence. The effects of medically important spiders are sometimes underestimated and simultaneously there is misattribution of effects to harmless spider groups. The majority of suspected spider bites present as skin lesions or necrotic ulcers where the history of a spider bite must be confirmed. To be a definite spider bite, the patient must immediately observe the spider and there be evidence of the bite, such as pain. Important groups of spiders worldwide include the widow spiders (latrodectism), recluse spiders (loxoscelism) and some mygalomorph spiders including the Australian Funnel web spider. Most spiders only cause minor effects, including a large number of groups that have been implicated in necrotic arachnidism.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Bites by spiders of the family Theraphosidae in humans and canines.

Spiders of the family Theraphosidae occur throughout most tropical regions of the world. There have only been three case reports of bites by these spiders in Australia. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical effects of bites by Australian theraphosid spiders in both humans and canines. Cases of spider bite were collected by the authors over the period January 1978-April 2002, either prospectively in a large study of Australian spider bites, or retrospectively from cases reported to the authors. Subjects were included if they had a definite bite and had collected the spider. The spiders were identified by an expert arachnologist to genus and species level where possible. There were nine confirmed bites by spiders of the family Theraphosidae in humans and seven in canines. These included bites by two Selenocosmia spp. and by two Phlogiellus spp. The nine spider bites in humans did not cause major effects. Local pain was the commonest effect, with severe pain in four of seven cases where severity of pain was recorded. Puncture marks or bleeding were the next most common effect. In one case the spider had bitten through the patient's fingernail. Mild systemic effects occurred in one of nine cases. There were seven bites in dogs (Phlogellius spp. and Selenocosmia spp.), and in two of these the owner was bitten after the dog. In all seven cases the dog died, and as rapidly as 0.5-2h after the bite. This small series of bites by Australian theraphosid spiders gives an indication of the spectrum of toxicity of these spiders in humans. Bites by these spiders are unlikely to cause major problems in humans. The study also demonstrates that the venom is far more toxic to canines.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Australian wolf spider bites (Lycosidae): clinical effects and influence of species on bite circumstances.

BACKGROUND: Necrotic arachnidism continues to be attributed to wolf spider bites. This study investigates the clinical effects of bites by wolf spiders in Australia (family Lycosidae). METHODS: Subjects were recruited prospectively from February 1999 to April 2001 from participating emergency departments or state poison information centers. Subjects were included if they had a definite bite by a wolf spider and had collected the spider, which was later identified by an arachnologist. Spiders were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible and cephalothorax width was measured to correlate bite effects and spider size. RESULTS: There were 45 definite wolf spider bites (23 male and 22 female patients; age range 1 to 69 years, median age 28 years). Species level identifications (14 species) were possible for 31 of 43 spiders belonging to seven different generic groupings. Most bites were by spiders from four generic groupings, Tasmanicosa (including 'Lycosa') (15), Venatrix (8), Venator (10), and Hogna (7). Bites occurred more commonly in south-eastern Australia and occurred throughout the year, with 7 bites (16%) in late autumn or winter. In 7 cases (16%) the person was swimming in or cleaning a pool. Seventy-two percent of bites occurred on distal parts of limbs. Pain occurred in all bites and was severe in 11 cases (24%), with a median duration of 10 min (IQR: 2-60 min). Other effects included puncture marks/bleeding (33%), swelling (20%), redness (67%), and itchiness (13%). Minor systemic effects occurred in three patients (7%): nausea (two), headache (one) and malaise (one). There were no cases of necrotic ulcers [0%; 97.5% CI 0-8%]. Tasmanicosa spider bites caused significantly more itchiness and redness, and large spiders (>5 mm) more often caused severe pain and left fang marks. CONCLUSION: Wolf spider bites cause minor effects, no more severe than most other spiders, and do not appear to cause necrotic ulcers. The effects are likely to be due to mechanical injury, although minor local envenomation occurs with Tasmanicosa bites.

Adolescent↗