Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Relative copy number variation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

57 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2024

Comprehensive molecular profiling of multiple myeloma identifies refined copy number and expression subtypes.

Multiple myeloma is a treatable, but currently incurable, hematological malignancy of plasma cells characterized by diverse and complex tumor genetics for which precision medicine approaches to treatment are lacking. The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation's Relating Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile study ( NCT01454297 ) is a longitudinal, observational clinical study of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (n = 1,143) where tumor samples are characterized using whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing at diagnosis and progression, and clinical data are collected every 3 months. Analyses of the baseline cohort identified genes that are the target of recurrent gain-of-function and loss-of-function events. Consensus clustering identified 8 and 12 unique copy number and expression subtypes of myeloma, respectively, identifying high-risk genetic subtypes and elucidating many of the molecular underpinnings of these unique biological groups. Analysis of serial samples showed that 25.5% of patients transition to a high-risk expression subtype at progression. We observed robust expression of immunotherapy targets in this subtype, suggesting a potential therapeutic option.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Comparison of actionable alterations in cancers with kinase fusion, mutation, and copy number alteration.

Kinase-related gene fusion and point mutations play pivotal roles as drivers in cancer, necessitating optimized, targeted therapy against these alterations. The efficacy of molecularly targeted therapeutics varies depending on the specific alteration, with great success reported for such therapeutics in the treatment of cancer with kinase fusion proteins. However, the involvement of actionable alterations in solid tumors, especially regarding kinase fusions, remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the number of actionable alterations in patients with tyrosine or serine/threonine kinase domain fusions, mutations, and copy number alterations (CNAs). We analyzed 613 patients with 40 solid cancer types who visited our division between June 2020 and April 2024. Furthermore, to detect alterations involving multiple-fusion calling, we performed comprehensive genomic sequencing using FoundationOne® companion diagnostic (F1CDx) and FoundationOne® Liquid companion diagnostic (F1LCDx). Patient characteristics and genomic profiles were analyzed to assess the frequency and distribution of actionable alterations across different cancer types. Notably, 44 of the 613 patients had fusions involving kinases, transcriptional regulators, or tumor suppressors. F1CDx and F1LCDx detected 13 cases with kinase-domain fusions. We identified 117 patients with kinase-domain mutations and 58 with kinase-domain CNAs. The number of actionable alterations in patients with kinase-domain fusion, mutation, or CNA (median [interquartile range; IQR]) was 2 (1-3), 5 (3-7), and 6 (4-8), respectively. Patients with kinase fusion had significantly fewer actionable alterations than those with kinase-domain mutations and CNAs. However, those with fusion involving tumor suppressors tended to have more actionable alterations (median [IQR]; 4 [2-9]). Cancers with kinase fusions exhibited fewer actionable alterations than those with kinase mutations and CNAs. These findings underscore the importance of detecting kinase alterations and indicate the pivotal role of kinase fusions as strong drivers of cancer development, highlighting their potential as prime targets for molecular therapeutics.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Assessing the de novo paradigm in sporadic early-onset Alzheimer disease trios.

The genetic architecture of sporadic Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease (sEOAD, onset ≤65 years) remains largely unknown. To assess the de novo mutation (DNM) hypothesis, we performed a nationwide recruitment of 37 novel sEOAD patients-unaffected parents trios. After assessing known monogenic genes, we performed trio-based exome sequencing and jointly analyzed novel trios with 12 previously reported ones. Of these, we selected 16 trios for genome sequencing. We identified three patients with a pathogenic DNM in APP or PSEN1. Then, from the 46 remaining trios, we identified 38 non-synonymous coding DNM and 4 de novo copy number variants (CNVs) in exome data. Four DNM (2 novel, in SPHK2 and DDR1) and bi-allelic inherited variants in two genes affected Alzheimer disease-related genes. No significant burden of rare coding variants in exome/genome data from 5643 EOAD cases and 16097 controls was identified using nested windows centered on each DNM position, at the transcript level. From genome data, one non-coding DNM was predicted to affect splicing in an AD-associated gene, PINX1. Overall, 48% probands carried ≥1 inherited risk factor with odds ratio (OR) > 1.5 and GWAS-defined Genetic Risk Scores (GRS) distribution was more consistent with random distribution than enrichment in higher scores in probands. We confirm that DNMs in known monogenic genes explain sEOAD in a minority of cases, while candidate DNMs in other genes might account for a small proportion of additional cases. The majority of sEOAD patients may have a complex etiology including multiple inherited variants, however, GRS might not explain most of its genetic component.

Humans↗