Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Refractive Errors”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Heritability of refractive error and familial aggregation of myopia in an elderly American population.

PURPOSE: To determine the heritability of refractive error and the familial aggregation of myopia in an older population. METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-nine siblings (mean age, 73.4 years) in 241 families were recruited from the Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Study in eastern Maryland. Refractive error was determined by noncycloplegic subjective refraction (if presenting distance visual acuity was < or =20/40) or lensometry (if best corrected visual acuity was >20/40 with spectacles). Participants were considered plano (refractive error of zero) if uncorrected visual acuity was >20/40. Preoperative refraction from medical records was used for pseudophakic subjects. Heritability of refractive error was calculated with multivariate linear regression and was estimated as twice the residual between-sibling correlation after adjusting for age, gender, and race. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of myopia, given a myopic sibling relative to having a nonmyopic sibling. RESULTS: The estimated heritability of refractive error was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34%-88%) in this population. The age-, race-, and sex-adjusted ORs of myopia were 2.65 (95% CI: 1.67-4.19), 2.25 (95% CI: 1.31-3.87), 3.00 (95% CI: 1.56-5.79), and 2.98 (95% CI: 1.51-5.87) for myopia thresholds of -0.50, -1.00, -1.50, and -2.00 D, respectively. Neither race nor gender was significantly associated with an increased risk of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error and myopia are highly heritable in this elderly population.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Distribution of refractive errors in albinos and persons with idiopathic congenital nystagmus.

We compared retrospectively the distribution of refractive errors in a sample of adolescent and adult albinos (n = 19) with that in persons with idiopathic congenital nystagmus (CN) (n = 46), whose eye movements are similar to those of albinos but whose visual acuity is better. The distribution of spherical-equivalent refractive errors is more broadly distributed and slightly less myopic in albinos than in persons with idiopathic CN. On average, albinos also have more astigmatism (primarily with-the-rule), than persons with idiopathic CN. Unlike the leptokurtic distribution of refractive error that characterizes the normal adolescent and adult population, the distributions of refractive error for albinos and for persons with idiopathic CN exhibit no significant kurtosis. Moreover, neither group of subjects exhibits significant kurtosis for refractive errors in the vertical meridian, which corresponds to the retinal-image orientation with the least motion smear during horizontal nystagmus. The absence of significant leptokurtosis in the refractive-error distributions of young-adult albinos and persons with idiopathic CN suggests that the presence of nystagmus may interfere with normal refractive development.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Changes in refractive error for exotropes treated with overminus lenses.

The refractive changes of pediatric patients who were prescribed overminus lenses for exotropia were evaluated. Overminus lenses means additional minus power over the lenses required to correct the refractive error at distance. Forty exotropic patients, ages 1 to 15 years, were prescribed overminus lenses (-0.50 D to -3.75 D) for a period of 9 to 86 months. A small but significant correlation was found between the initial refractive error and the mean annual change toward myopia. Other factors such as age when treatment was given, duration of therapy, amount of overminus, and the amount of the exodeviation had little effect on the rate of myopic change. The mean annual changes in refractive error for hyperopes (-0.13 +/- 0.44 D, N = 15), emmetropes (-0.26 +/- 0.37 D, N = 17), and myopes (-0.75 +/- 0.77 D, N = 18) were similar to values reported in the literature for nonexotropic children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Spherocylindrical refractive errors and visual acuity.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the relation between refractive error and visual acuity is complicated if astigmatic blur is present. No models are in widespread use that allow the combination of spherical and astigmatic errors for the purpose of predicting visual performance. METHODS: Models for combining spherical and astigmatic errors are discussed, and predictions of these models using data from the literature are presented. RESULTS: Three models for combining astigmatic with spherical errors are shown to predict visual acuity performance in uncorrected myopic refractive errors. A dioptric vector addition model is shown to have advantages over other candidate models. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to combine spherocylindrical refractive errors into a single value when the objective is to correlate these values with visual acuity performance.

Eyeglasses↗
PubMed2003

Distribution of refractive error in healthy infants.

PURPOSE: Few data exist regarding the upper limits of refractive error distributions in healthy infants; the data that do exist are biased because they were selected from the records of pediatric ophthalmology practices. We sought to obtain these data to validate examination failure criteria for vision screening. METHODS: We reviewed records from all children age birth to 5 years seen at the Tennessee Lions Eye Center at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital with a billing diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction and no comorbid ocular diagnoses except for refractive error. This was to avoid referral bias for any condition that could have influenced refractive error. All patients received a complete eye examination and cycloplegic refraction. Cumulative probability distribution (CPD) plots and means for spherical and cylindrical refractive error and anisometropia were prepared. RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients were studied; mean age was 15.5 +/- 9.9 months (range, 2 days to 66 months). The mean refractive error (spherical equivalent) was +1.4 D +/- 1.1 D. CPD plot analysis showed 95% of hyperopia to be < +3.25 D. Two children had myopia </=-1.00 D. The mean astigmatism was +0.2 D +/- 0.4 D, and 74% of patients had no astigmatism. Seven children had astigmatism > +1.00 D in one eye. CPD plot analysis showed 95% of astigmatism to be < +1.50 D and 95% of meridional anisometropia to be < 1.50 D. Six children had anisometropia >/=1.50 D, and 3 children had anisometropia > 3.00 D. CONCLUSIONS: At least 95% of children have hyperopia < +3.25 D, astigmatism < +1.50 D, and anisometropia < 1.50 D. This information will prove useful in identifying the natural history and prevalence of amblyogenic factors identified during preschool vision screening.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2003

Refractive error and ethnicity in children.

OBJECTIVE: To report the baseline prevalence of refractive error in the study population. DESIGN: A multicenter, longitudinal, observational study of refractive error and ocular development in children from 4 ethnic groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population included 2523 children (534 African American, 491 Asian, 463 Hispanic, and 1035 white) in grades 1 to 8 (age, 5-17 years). Myopia was defined as -0.75 diopters (D) or more and hyperopia as +1.25 D or more in each principal meridian, and astigmatism was defined as at least a 1.00-D difference between the 2 principal meridians (cycloplegic autorefraction). RESULTS: Overall, 9.2% of the children were myopic, 12.8% were hyperopic, and 28.4% were astigmatic. There were significant differences in the refractive error prevalences as a function of ethnicity (chi2, P<.001), even after controlling for age and sex (polychotomous logistic regression, P<.001). For myopia, Asians had the highest prevalence (18.5%), followed by Hispanics (13.2%). Whites had the lowest prevalence of myopia (4.4%), which was not significantly different from African Americans (6.6%). For hyperopia, whites had the highest prevalence (19.3%), followed by Hispanics (12.7%). Asians had the lowest prevalence of hyperopia (6.3%) and were not significantly different from African Americans (6.4%). For astigmatism, Asians and Hispanics had the highest prevalences (33.6% and 36.9%, respectively) and did not differ from each other (P =.17). African Americans had the lowest prevalence of astigmatism (20.0%), followed by whites (26.4%). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in the prevalence of refractive errors among ethnic groups, even after controlling for age and sex (P<.001).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of refractive errors and to investigate factors associated with refractive error in adults 30 years of age and older in Bangladesh. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 12 782 adults 30 years of age and older. METHODS: The sample of subjects was selected based on multistage, cluster random sampling with probability-proportional-to-size procedures. The examination protocol consisted of an interview that included measures of literacy, education, occupation, and refractive correction. Visual acuity testing (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), automated refraction, and optic disc examination were performed for all subjects. Subjects with <6/12 (0.3 logMAR) acuity in either eye were graded additionally for cataract and underwent a dilated fundal examination. Subjects for whom no refractive error was recorded (312 subjects; 2.7%) or who had undergone cataract surgery (123 subjects; 1.1%) were excluded from the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Refractive error and socioeconomic variables (literacy, education, occupation). RESULTS: Eleven thousand six hundred twenty-four subjects were examined (90.9% response rate; mean age+/-standard deviation, 44+/-12.6 years). Five thousand four hundred eighty-nine subjects (49.1%) were men and 5700 subjects (50.9%) were women. Mean spherical equivalent was -0.19 diopters (D; +/-1.50 D). Six thousand four hundred twelve subjects (57.3%) were emmetropic, 2469 (22.1%) were myopic (<-0.5 D), and 2308 (20.6%) were hypermetropic (>+0.5 D). Two hundred six subjects (1.8%) were highly myopic (<-5 D). Myopia was more common in men (26.3%) than in women (21.0%), whereas hyperopia was more common in women (27.4%) than in men (15.8%). Overall, myopia increased with age (17.5% of those aged 30-39 years were myopic, compared with 65.5% of those age 70 years and older). A subanalysis of subjects without cataract showed increasing hyperopia with age and an association between myopia and higher education. Myopia was more common among the employed than in unemployed subjects. Astigmatism (>0.5 D), present in 3625 subjects (32.4%), was more common among women, illiterate subjects, and unschooled subjects. Against-the-rule astigmatism was more common (58.7%) than oblique astigmatism (29.3%), which was more common than with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism (12.1%). Against-the-rule astigmatism and oblique astigmatism increased with age, unlike WTR astigmatism. Of 830 (7.5%) subjects, women were more commonly anisometropic (>1.0 D). Anisometropia increased with age. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error data are described for a country and region that previously have lacked population-based data. Prevalence and factors associated with refractive error are presented, with a detailed comparison with other population-based surveys regionally and internationally.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Longitudinal changes in the spherical equivalent refractive error of children with accommodative esotropia.

AIM: To assess the longitudinal changes in the spherical equivalent (SE) refractive errors of children with accommodative esotropia as a function of the age when glasses were prescribed. METHODS: Refractive errors were followed longitudinally for 126 children with accommodative esotropia for a mean of 4.4 (SD 2.5) years. Cycloplegic refractions were performed using an autorefractor for older children and retinoscopy for younger children. The refractive data were analysed for three groups of children based on their age at the time spectacles were prescribed. RESULTS: The initial SE refractive error was age dependent (<2 years, 5.1 (1.9) D; 2-<4 years, 4.2 (1.9) D; 4-8 years, 3.8 (1.7) D). Children in all age groups had an initial increase in their SE refractive error, followed by a later decrease; however, the greatest decrease occurred in the patients in the oldest age group. The SE refractive error peaked 1 year after spectacles were prescribed for the children 4-8 years of age versus 6 years after spectacles were prescribed for the children less than 2 years of age. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal changes in SE refractive error for children with accommodative esotropia vary as a function of their age when spectacle wear is initiated.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed2003

Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the psychometric properties of a vision-targeted measure of health-related quality of life, the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life survey (NEI-RQL), which includes 13 scales designed to assess the impact of refractive error and its correction on day-to-day life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: The NEI-RQL was self-administered by 667 myopes, 380 hyperopes, and 114 emmetropes recruited from the practices of 6 medical centers. All participants had near and distance visual acuity of 20/32 or better in the worse eye while benefiting from their current method for correction of refractive error (glasses, contact lens, refractive surgery). METHODS: Mean scores, standard deviations, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest intraclass correlations were estimated for the NEI-RQL scales. Item discrimination was assessed by item-scale correlations. Construct validity was evaluated by assessing the sensitivity of scale scores to type of refractive error, type of refractive error correction, and spherical equivalent. Construct validity of the NEI-RQL was compared to those of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) and the National Eye Institute Vision Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) in a random subsample of respondents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 13 NEI-RQL scales-clarity of vision, expectations, near vision, far vision, diurnal fluctuations, activity limitations, glare, symptoms, dependence on correction, worry, suboptimal correction, appearance, and satisfaction with correction. RESULTS: Emmetropes tended to score significantly better on the NEI-RQL scales than myopes and hyperopes. The method of refractive error correction was also associated with NEI-RQL scores. In addition, the NEI-RQL multi-item scales accounted for 29% of the variance in the NEI-RQL satisfaction with correction item beyond that explained by the SF-36 and the NEI VFQ-25. CONCLUSION: These results support the reliability and construct validity of the NEI-RQL. The instrument appears to be useful for comparisons of people with different types of correction for refractive error.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

A comparison of cycloplegic refraction to the near retinoscopy technique for refractive error determination.

The near retinoscopy technique of refractive error determination was compared to the standard method of cycloplegic refraction using 10 "infants" (3-12 months of age) and 10 "children" (32-109 months of age). There was a significant difference between the techniques for both sphere and cylinder power. Although there was no interaction of refractive technique and age group, the difference between near retinoscopy and cycloplegic refractive error tended to be larger for infants than for children. No significant difference was found when the average refractive values were compared for monocular or binocular conditions and no significant effect was found for either gender or laterality (right versus left eye). Based on these findings, it is suggested that caution be used in substituting the near retinoscopy technique for cycloplegic refraction even utilizing a "correction" factor for the dioptric difference between techniques.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1983

Visual disability and blindness secondary to refractive errors in Africa.

Optical defects of the light-focusing apparatus of the eye are called errors of refraction. They are responsible for 13% of all significant vision loss in Kenya, ranking third of all causes, after cataract and trachoma. As the overall prevalence of such visual impairment in the Country is 3.7%, roughly 0.5% of the population can be said to need spectacles to obtain normal vision. The comparable figure for secondary school children in Nigeria has been found to be 2.4%. In addition, patients require special spectacles after cataract surgery to obtain adequate vision; without such spectacles these patients are still 'blind' by World Health Organization criteria. These glasses can be obtained through mission societies and various charitable organizations for a little as $5 per pair, and can be manufactured locally with available ophthalmic manpower and technology. Alternatives to spectacles such as contact lenses, intra-ocular lenses and Kerato-refractive surgery are not suitable for use in developing Countries.

Africa↗
PubMed1990

[Refractive errors, strabismus and amblyopia in pre-school screening--experiences using a vision test in kindergarten].

UNLABELLED: Within the framework of mass screenings conducted by the Public Health service section for juveniles, 254 children were examined jointly on a voluntary basis in 5 different kindergartens. The examined children represented in each case 88% of the respective kindergarten groups. The examination programme included, among others, the R5 apparatus (visual acuity in respect of remote objects with and without + 1.5 D), Lang- and DeKa Stereo Test, Cover-and-Uncover Test with remote and near fixation, heterostatic retinoscopy (in 205 children only), ophthalmoscopic fixation test. In addition, the acceptance for U8 and the degree of care in respect of ophthalmological control and treatment were investigated. RESULTS: Strabismus or significant uncorrected errors of refraction were discovered by the on-target tests of covering and uncovering, fixation and retinoscopy in 26 of 205 completely examined children (12.7%). This had not been satisfactorily covered by single tests such as R5-Visus test with the criteria much less than 1.0 (grade 5) or much less than 0.7 (grade 4), respectively stereo tests. The combination of "R5-Test Visus much less than 1.0" and "DeKa Stereo Test not fully identified" attained a sensitivity of 81% with a positive predictive value of only 28%. This combination, therefore, results in too many healthy children being referred to the ophthalmologist. "R5-Test Visus much less than 0.7" and "DeKa Stereo Test not fully identified" attained a sensitivity of 75% with a positive predictive value of 44%. This combination is recommended as long as the R5 or R11 apparatuses are used. The phoria and stereo tests contained in the R5 apparatus are unsuitable for kindergarten screening.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amblyopia↗
PubMed1992

Optic nerve crescents and refractive error.

In this paper we discuss whether the presence of an optic nerve crescent might affect the way in which axial length and corneal curvature interact to determine refractive error. Subjective refraction, keratometry, measurement of body height, axial length of the eye, and stereophotography of the optic nerves were performed on 224 subjects, 8- to 25-years-old. Photographs were examined under magnification; optic nerve crescents, if present, were measured in the horizontal dimension. Those measurements were then corrected for magnification due to the eye and the camera. Logistic regression analysis suggested that male gender and myopic refractive error were most directly associated with the presence of a large crescent, whereas axial length, age, and horizontal keratometry reading were less directly associated with the presence of a crescent. The relation between axial length and refractive error differed among those with large crescents compared to those with small or no crescents. Simple regression showed that, for those with a crescent at least 0.2-mm wide, a 1-mm greater axial length was associated with, on the average, 1.26 D of myopia. For those with smaller or no crescents, a 1-mm greater axial length was associated with only 0.66 D of myopia. This difference was statistically significant at the 0.02 level of confidence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Significant postoperative refractive errors in vivo with the Mentor Memorylens intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To determine the difference between the predicted and postoperative refraction in eyes after implantation of the Mentor MemoryLens intraocular lens (IOL) and compare these results with those of 2 other types of foldable IOLs implanted by the same surgeons. SETTING: Community-based group practice ophthalmology clinic. METHODS: All operated eyes (341) of all patients who had routine phacoemulsification with implantation of a MemoryLens IOL performed by 1 of 2 surgeons were evaluated retrospectively. The predicted refractive error and actual postoperative refractive error were compared in each eye in the MemoryLens group and in 2 smaller control groups with an AcrySof acrylic (Alcon) or SI-40 silicone (Allergan Medical Optics) IOL implanted by the same surgeons using identical technique and IOL calculation parameters. Patients in whom the difference between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction fell significantly outside expected parameters were rechecked with repeat axial length and keratometric readings, and these measurements were used to back-calculate the effective in vivo IOL power. RESULTS: The MemoryLens group had significantly greater variability in postoperative refractive results from those predicted by the Hoffer program than the 2 control groups. The postoperative refractive error in the MemoryLens group differed from +1.50 to -5.50 diopters (D) from that predicted by the IOL calculation formulas. When the outlier groups (ie, greater than +0.50 D or less than -1.00 D from predicted refractive error) were evaluated and compared to the rest of the MemoryLens group and the 2 control groups, no significant difference in axial length, keratometric measurements, operative surgeon, surgical technique, or patient age was found. Repeat axial length and keratometric measurements in the outlier group were not significantly different from those in the same eyes preoperatively. Back-calculation using postoperative axial length and keratometric measurements in the highly myopic outlier group showed that the mean difference between the labeled IOL power and actual in vivo IOL power in the outlier group was -3.08 D (range -1.98 to -7.54 D). The best corrected visual acuity was not affected in patients in the outlier groups despite the refractive variability. CONCLUSION: The variation in postoperative refractive results in the MemoryLens group was significantly greater than in the 2 other foldable IOL groups.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2004

Changes in keratometric corneal power and refractive error after laser thermal keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of laser thermal keratoplasty (LTK) on corneal power and refractive error to develop a logical approach to calculating accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power for cataract surgery. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: Laser thermal keratoplasty was performed in 27 eyes of 23 patients. Preoperatively and postoperatively, the refractive error was measured and the corneal power obtained by manual keratometry and topography. The changes in keratometric corneal power and refractive error after LTK were compared. RESULTS: The mean age of the 15 women and 8 men was 45.0 years +/- 4.6 (SD) (range 43 to 61 years). The mean preoperative refractive error was +1.43 +/- 0.97 diopters (D) (range 0 to +3.63 D) at the spectacle plane and +1.46 +/- 1.01 D (range 0 to +3.79 D) at the corneal plane. The mean postoperative refractive error was -0.44 +/- 1.07 D (range -2.24 to +2.18 D) at the spectacle plane and -0.44 +/- 1.08 D (range -2.18 to +2.23 D) at the corneal plane. After surgery, corneal powers measured by manual keratometry were significantly smaller than those measured by topography (P<.001) and refractive error changes were significantly smaller than keratometric changes (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: After LTK, corneal power measured by manual keratometry was smaller than that measured by corneal topography and changes in corneal power measured by conventional keratometric instruments were greater than changes in refractive error. This difference should be considered in calculating IOL power in post-LTK eyes to prevent undesirable hyperopia after cataract surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children.

PURPOSE: To compare ocular component growth curves among four refractive error groups in children. methods Cycloplegic refractive error was categorized into four groups: persistent emmetropia between -0.25 and +1.00 D (exclusive) in both the vertical and horizontal meridians on all study visits (n = 194); myopia of at least -0.75 D in both meridians on at least one visit (n = 247); persistent hyperopia of at least +1.00 D in both meridians on all visits (n = 43); and emmetropizing hyperopia of at least +1.00 D in both meridians on at least the first but not at all visits (n = 253). Subjects were seen for three visits or more between the ages of 6 and 14 years. Growth curves were modeled for the persistent emmetropes to describe the relation between age and the ocular components and were applied to the other three refractive error groups to determine significant differences. results At baseline, eyes of myopes and persistent emmetropes differed in vitreous chamber depth, anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal power and produced growth curves that showed differences in the same ocular components. Persistent hyperopes were significantly different from persistent emmetropes in most components at baseline, whereas growth curve shapes were not significantly different, with the exception of anterior chamber depth (slower growth in persistent hyperopes compared with emmetropes) and axial length (lesser annual growth per year in persistent hyperopes compared with emmetropes). The growth curve shape for corneal power was different between the emmetropizing hyperopes and persistent emmetropes (increasing corneal power compared with decreasing power in emmetropes). conclusions Comparisons of growth curves between persistent emmetropes and three other refractive error groups showed that there are many similarities in the growth patterns for both the emmetropizing and persistent hyperopes, whereas the differences in growth lie mainly between the emmetropes and myopes.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Refractive errors and automated perimetry: discussion and case studies.

1. The effects of refractive error on automated perimetry were studied. The results of the study showed that an error of as little as 1 diopter can significantly influence the visual field to as much as 30 degrees from fixation. 2. In the case of automated visual field testing when only the central 30 degrees of visual field are tested, refractive error can cause a generalized depression. Because generalized depression can have several different causes, distinguishing between a true depression and one due to refractive error can be important. 3. Because a generalized depression from refractive error can mimic a depression due to true pathology, it is critical that the most recent refraction combined with the correct add for perimetry be used on each patient every time the patient undergoes a visual field examination.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Finite-element modeling of posterior lamellar keratoplasty: construction of theoretical nomograms for induced refractive errors.

PURPOSE: To estimate the theoretical corneal refractive error induced by mechanical weakening effects from posterior lamellar keratoplasty (PLKP) in the human cornea. METHODS: The refractive effects of PLKP are simulated by finite-element modeling (FEM) as a mathematical function of the thickness of the excised posterior lamellar corneal button, with a nonlinear formulation of stress-strain relation for the corneal material. A theoretical nomogram was developed to correlate the refractive changes to button thickness. RESULTS: The predicted refractive change after PLKP is less than 1 dpt for a 170-microm thickness posterior corneal button over a broad range of Young's modulus. Thicker buttons result in greater surgically induced refractive errors. CONCLUSIONS: According to FEM analysis, the excision of a posterior lamellar button of less than 170 microm thickness produces a minimal predicted refractive change (< 1 dpt) in the cornea after PLKP.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗