Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Recovery Room”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

[Is length of stay in the recovery room a risk factor for cross infections?].

OBJECTIVE: To assess cross contamination for patients at the time of their stay in the recovery room (RR). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective survey over 3 weeks with 75 adult patients admitted to RR after thoracic or neck surgery. Samples for bacterial analysis were systematically taken from all patients before they left the operating theatre and just before discharge of RR (nose-throat and skin adjacent to the surgical wound). During this period, hand's health care workers (HCW) and environmental surfaces were sampled. RESULTS: There were 3 groups of patients: endoscopy (41%), thoracic surgery (39%). And thyroidectomy (20%), 392 samples were analysed. Potentially pathogenic floras were found on the admission for 25 patients and at discharge for 31 patients. A pathogenic flora was detected at discharge in 13 patients, whereas none was found at admission in RR. These patients were principally in the thyroidectomy group and their stay in RR was longer than 20 minutes. There is no significant difference concerning the nosocomial risk between 3 groups. Pathogenic flora was found in 19% of HCW (8 of 42). CONCLUSION: Cross contamination can exist in recovery room and educative measures are to be taken regarding handwhashing, isolation precautions and environmental cleaning.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Criteria for the safe discharge of patients from the recovery room.

Guidelines need to be in place to help nurses in the recovery room make appropriate and safe decisions when discharging patients to a surgical ward. Consciousness level, respiration, circulation, pain control, homeostasis and wound care should all be considered. Criteria from the Freeman Hospital provides practical guidance.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗
PubMed1975

A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room.

A new and very simple scoring system for recording post-anaesthetic recovery is described. When numerical values are assigned to factors indicating recovery progress or lack of it is obvious. The records may have medico-legal value. It can be incorporated into the Recovery Room Record.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Recovery room risk and outcome associated with renal extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) the general risk and outcome in the recovery room among 4 different anesthetic techniques associated with 2 different extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) machines and (2) any gender-related differences among patients undergoing ESWL. DESIGN: Retrospective statistical analysis. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: 2,203 ASA physical status I-IV patients undergoing ESWL over a 46-month period. INTERVENTIONS: A review of the chart records of patients who received 1 of 4 anesthetic techniques (general, spinal, epidural, or monitored anesthesia care) on 1 of 2 ESWL machines. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A positive finding was defined as a complication and/or side effect of such significance as to require a treatment order or recovery room note on the patient's chart. The main complications and/or side effects were nausea and/or vomiting, flank pain, and hypertension. Female patients experienced flank pain and nausea and/or vomiting with general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care at approximately twice the frequency of males. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Overall, ESWL is relatively safe. Both machine types and all anesthetic techniques exhibited a low risk and good outcome. (2) There appear to be gender-related differences during ESWL. Female and male patients may have different pain and nausea and/or vomiting thresholds during ESWL.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Pulse oximetry in the recovery room.

Haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SO2) was measured percutaneously with a pulse oximeter, in a group of 150 healthy ambulant volunteers to determine the range of normal values. The measuring site was not arterialised in advance. SO2 was below 94% in 13.3% of cases, while in no case was it below 90%. SO2 was then measured in 350 patients in the recovery room after a variety of surgical and anaesthetic procedures. Only 1.1% of patients who received additional oxygen following general anaesthesia exhibited an SO2 below 90%, compared to 16.7% of similar cases who did not receive additional oxygen. Administration of additional oxygen raised the SO2 above 90% in all the latter cases. In only 55.3% of those who did not receive additional oxygen was the SO2 above 94%, compared to 86.7% of normal volunteers and 73.9% of patients who received additional oxygen. This study reiterates the need to administer supplemental oxygen to all patients in the recovery room, unless facilities are available to measure SO2. A lower alarm limit of 90% is appropriate for the peri-operative period when using the Criticare Systems 501 oximeter.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Patient flow patterns in a recovery room and implications for staffing.

A detailed analysis of the occupancy of a new recovery room in a small district general hospital was undertaken during the initial three months of its use. The main problems were found to be irregular workload, consistently high patient occupancy over lunchtime, and difficulty in matching traditional nursing shifts to periods of heavy workload.

Bed Occupancy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Analysis and comparison of the guidelines regarding recovery-room management].

The purpose of this study was to analyse and compare the guidelines regarding Recovery-Room (RR) management at international level, pointing out the main differences and common aspects. The guidelines on the RR management in various countries have been compared in particular the Italian, French, German, Australian, Canadian and American guidelines. In addition, the management of postoperative patients in some of these countries where guidelines on the subject have not yet been published have been analysed. In some countries, France for instance, the guidelines have been published as a ministerial decree (Décret n degrees 94-1050 du Décembre 1994) and are therefore a law with proper articles, in others (Italy for instance), they are mere recommendations, which do not have immediate effect and are regarded as a target to be achieved. SIAARTI considers that this is due to the dishomogeneity of the Italian hospital situation as far as medical and nursing staff as well as buildings and applied technology are concerned. The comparison between guidelines of different countries has shown that RR is a reality which has now existed for many years at international level and it has demonstrated that all guidelines agree on the fact that postoperative patients must be observed in a protected and safe environment. The following rules are common to all guidelines: the anaesthetist is responsible for the RR and for discharging the patient; there must be a clinical record and a written report which are considered to be essential (not in Italy); RR must be next to the surgical rooms; the patient must be escorted to RR by the anesthetist; monitoring must be guaranteed during transfer; monitoring continuity in RR (at regular and a appropriate intervals) is essential. The following rules are not common to all guidelines: numbers of beds in RR; the proportion between the number of nurses and the number of patients; regulation for day-surgery; specific regulations for obstetrical patients. Guidelines are subject, as any regulation, to continuous revision, and this is a very important requirement which helps keeping them always update and in line with scientific research.

Guidelines as Topic↗
PubMed1989

Recovery room oxygenation: a comparison of nasal catheters and 40 per cent oxygen masks.

One hundred and sixty-one ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing elective surgery were evaluated using nasal catheters versus 40 per cent O2 venturi masks. Twenty-one per cent of the patients arrived in the recovery room with hypoxia as measured with a pulse oximeter (SaO2 less than 90 per cent). Fifteen minutes later all patients who arrived hypoxic were well oxygenated on their chosen oxygen therapy. Only one patient that arrived normoxic became hypoxic using a nasal catheter 15 minutes later. There was no statistical difference between patients given 40 per cent O2 by mask versus patients given oxygen by nasal catheter. The mean SaO2 for the group given 40 per cent O2 at 15 minutes was 96.7 +/- 2.15 per cent versus 96.6 +/- 2.48 per cent for nasal catheters. Nasal catheters are as effective as 40 per cent O2 masks for treating hypoxia in the recovery room. Obesity and age were statistically significant risk factors in the patients that arrived hypoxic. Patients were 47.4 +/- 15.6 years in the hypoxic group versus 38.3 +/- 15.6 years in the non-hypoxic group (p less than 0.001). Patients having an endotracheal tube with intermittent positive pressure ventilation or having a premedication were more apt to be hypoxic on arrival. These last two factors were closely associated and may reflect bias. The patient's gender, history of smoking, presence of obstructive lung disease, not including asthma, location of incision, or type of anaesthetic were not statistically significant risk factors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

[Considerations of patient evaluations in the recovery room].

The quality in patient assistance concern has been more constant than the high complexity of patient treatment needed in an anaesthetic recovery room. Thinking that is necessary to have assurance and efficiency in any evaluation, which has to consider all endocrine and metabolic variations resulting from patient surgical trauma, may be suggested the standardization and criterization of evaluation methods to patient assistance, and of course the validation of them.

Humans↗
PubMed1989

New discharge criteria decrease recovery room time after subarachnoid block.

The authors completed a two-phase study to determine criteria that might predict hemodynamic stability during recovery from subarachnoid block (SAB). Patients' supine and sitting (2 min) blood pressures were determined at 30-min intervals in the recovery room (RR). In the first group of 26 patients, retrospective analysis revealed that the orthostatic decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) never exceeded 15% following two successive orthostatic decreases of 10% or less. This finding was validated prospectively in a second group of 26 patients. Following two successive orthostatic MAP decreases of 10% or less, none of 65 orthostatic challenges resulted in an MAP decrease of more than 15%; conversely, in the absence of two successive MAP decreases of less than 10%, 5 of 51 orthostatic challenges resulted in an MAP decrease of greater than 15% (P less than 0.02). Had patients been discharged from the RR based on two successive MAP decreases of less than 10%, 35 of 52 patients could have been discharged from the RR 76 +/- 6 min (mean +/- SE) sooner than they would have under usual empirical discharge criteria of supine hemodynamic stability, regression of sensory level to T10, and return of toe movement. Following SAB, hemodynamic stability may return before sensory and motor function; for many patients, orthostatic testing following SAB may safely decrease the amount of time spent in the RR.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Use of the labor-delivery-recovery room in an urban tertiary care hospital.

Single-room maternity care is an attractive delivery system to obstetricians and consumers. We reviewed the first 15 months' experience in a committed labor-delivery-recovery room unit where all patients were admitted for single-room care regardless of risk. The rate of transfer to a traditional delivery room for vaginal delivery was 3.8%.

Delivery Rooms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Recovery Room. Organization and clinical aspects].

Correct administration in the early postoperative phase is decisive in the final outcome of surgery and the presence of the Recovery Room (RR) contributes significantly to a reduction in the post-operative risk rate. The objectives of the RR are: removal of the pharmacological effect of general anaesthesia; stabilization of vital parameters (circulation and ventilation); stabilization of body temperature; control of the hydro-electrolytic balance; intensive intervention in the case of an acute complication; prescribing a suitable postoperative analgesia; recovering movement in the case of loco-regional anesthesia. Organization of RR must take into consideration: 1) aspect of environment and location; 2) transport of the patient from the operating room to the RR; 3) definition of the equipment necessary for the RR; 4) definition of the role and qualification of the medical and nursing staff; 5) definition of regulations of assistance and the clinical file; 6) definition of criteria for discharge and transfer; 7) definition of means of adjournment, improvement and comparison with other similar structures. RR is administered by an Anesthetist with clinical, therapeutic and decision-making responsibility for the discharge of patients, while the supervision and assistance patients is entrusted to specialised professional nurses. From a clinical point of view the following data are monitored and recorded: the vital signs (passage of air-ways, cardiac and respiratory frequency, arterial pressure, saturation of O2, EtCO2 (in patient with air-way support), body temperature and the state of consciousness, instrumental monitoring of the patient (at pre-established time intervals), control of the skin, the peripheral circulation, surgical wounds, drainage and catheters. The percentage of incidence of complications in RR varies from 6-7 to 30% depending on various studies, probably in relation to the diversity of criteria in defining the complication. The principal complications which can be found in RR, reported in several studies are: respiratory (obstruction of the air-way, hypoxemia, hypoventilation, inhalation), cardio-circulatory (hypotension, hypertension, arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia), postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypothermia and hyperthermia, delayed re-awakening, disorientation and hyper-excitability, postoperative shivering. As long as the patient can be discharged from the RR the following requisites must be satisfied: return of a state of consciousness, stable cardio-circulatory parameters, absence of respiratory depression, absence of bleeding, absence of nausea and vomiting, good analgesia and recovery of movement in the case of loco-regional anesthesia (on this last point not all authors agree). What has been said until now shows the function, usefulness and importance of RRs which must not replace the Intensive Therapy Units. In fact, they are places where the cure must be concluded, in which the Anesthetist is responsible for the whole process. This cure must begin in the preoperative period, continue in the intraoperative period and it is compulsory to proceed in the immediate postoperative period until such a time that, because of the anesthesia administered, the clinical situation of the patient ceases to be considered a potential medical-surgical urgency-emergency .

Anesthesiology↗