Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RIBOSOMES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Interaction of RRF and EF-G from E. coli and T. thermophilus with ribosomes from both origins--insight into the mechanism of the ribosome recycling step.

Ribosome recycling factor (RRF), elongation factor-G (EF-G), and ribosomes from Thermus thermophilus (tt-) and Escherichia coli (ec-) were used to study the disassembly mechanism of post-termination ribosomal complexes by these factors. With tt-RRF, ec-EF-G can release bound-tRNA from ec-model post-termination complexes. However, tt-RRF is not released by ec-EF-G from ec-ribosomes. This complex with tt-RRF and ec-ribosomes after the tRNA release by ec-EF-G is regarded as an intermediate of the disassembly reaction. Not only tt-RRF, but also mRNA, cannot be released from ec-ribosomes by tt-RRF and ec-EF-G. These data suggest that the release of RRF from ribosomes is coupled or closely related to the release of mRNA during disassembly of post-termination complexes. With tt-ribosomes, ec-EF-G cannot release ribosome-bound ec-RRF even though they are from the same species, showing that proper interaction of ec-RRF and ec-EF-G does not occur on tt-ribosomes. On the other hand, in contrast to a published report, tt-EF-G functions with ec-RRF to disassemble ec-post-termination complexes. In support of this finding, tt-EF-G translocates peptidyl tRNA on ec-ribosomes and catalyzes ec-ribosome-dependent GTPase, showing that tt-EF-G has in vitro translocation activity with ec-ribosomes. Since tt-EF-G with ec-RRF can release tRNA from ec-post-termination complexes, the data are consistent with the hypothesis that the release of tRNA by RRF and EF-G from post-termination complexes is a result of a translocation-like activity of EF-G on RRF.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Some base substitutions in the leader of an Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA operon affect the structure and function of ribosomes. Evidence for a transient scaffold function of the rRNA leader.

Recently, we reported on the creation of a systematic series of C to T transition mutations, located between 19 and 45 nucleotides upstream of the mature 16 S RNA 5' end of a complete, plasmid encoded ribosomal RNA operon. We showed that some of these base transitions have pronounced effects on the growth phenotype of mutant cells, and on the stability of their 16 S RNA as well as on the association capability of their ribosomal subunits. From these observations we concluded that the mutated leader region has post-transcriptional functions in the biogenesis of ribosomes. To further substantiate our conclusions we have now analyzed the growth phenotypes of some leader mutants in more detail, and show here that they are temperature dependent. Furthermore, we have isolated ribosomal RNA, 70 S ribosomes and ribosomal subunits from wild-type and mutant strains and subjected them to a detailed structural and functional analysis. We show that processing and maturation of the 16 S RNA is not altered as a consequence of the base transitions in the leader. In contrast, comparison of the protein composition of wild-type and mutant 30 S particles by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis revealed specific differences. Wild-type 30 S subunits, which are not tightly bound to 50 S, are lacking many ribosomal proteins, while the same fraction of ribosomes from mutant cells has an approximately complete r-protein set, and instead contains some additional non-ribosomal proteins. The translational activity of mutant and wild-type total ribosome preparations was analyzed in vitro. Ribosomes from slowly growing mutants show a significantly reduced in vitro translational activity, which is caused by the 30 S subunits. In contrast, the defects in association reside mainly in the 50 S subunits. Our results demonstrate that some base substitutions in the leader of an Escherichia coli rRNA operon affect the structure and function of ribosomes, although the mutated region is not part of the particles finally formed. This finding implies that at least part of the leader region assists the structure formation of functional 30 S subunits, before it is cut away and discarded. We argue that the rrn leader thus fulfills the functional criteria of a transient molecular scaffold.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1975

Membrane-bound ribosomes of myeloma cells. III. The role of the messenger RNA and the nascent polypeptide chain in the binding of ribosomes to membranes.

Mild ribonuclease treatment of the membrane fraction of P3K cells released three types of membrane-bound ribosomal particles: (a) all the newly made native 40S subunits detected after 2 h of [3H]uridine pulse. Since after a 3-min pulse with [35S]methionine these membrane native subunits appear to contain at least sevenfold more Met-tRNA per particle than the free native subunits, they may all be initiation complexes with mRNA molecules which have just become associated with the membranes; (b) about 50% of the ribosomes present in polyribosomes. Evidence is presented that the released ribosomes carry nascent chains about two and a half to three times shorter than those present on the ribosomes remaining bound to the membranes. It is proposed that in the membrane-bound polyribosomes of P3K cells, only the ribosomes closer to the 3' end of the mRNA molecules are directly bound, while the latest ribosomes to enter the polyribosomal structures are indirectly bound through the mRNA molecules; (c) a small number of 40S subunits of polyribosomal origin, presumably initiation complexes attached at the 5' end of mRNA molecules of polyribosomes. When the P3K cells were incubated with inhibitors acting at different steps of protein synthesis, it was found that puromycin and pactamycin decreased by about 40% the proportion of ribosomes in the membrane fraction, while cycloheximide and anisomycin had no such effect. The ribosomes remaining on the membrane fraction of puromycin-treated cells consisted of a few polyribosomes, and of an accumulation of 80S and 60S particles, which were almost entirely released by high salt treatment of the membranes. The membrane-bound ribosomes found after pactamycin treatment consisted of a few polyribosomes, with a striking accumulation of native 60S subunits and an increased number of native 40S subunits. On the basis of the observations made in this and the preceding papers, a model for the binding of ribosomes to membranes and for the ribosomal cycle on the membranes is proposed. It is suggested that ribosomal subunits exchange between free and membrane-bound polyribosomes through the cytoplasmic pool of free native subunits, and that their entry into membrane-bound ribosomes is mediated by mRNA molecules associated with membranes.

Anisomycin↗
PubMed1989

Mutations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12 influence the higher order structure of 16 S ribosomal RNA.

We have studied the effects of protein mutations on the higher order structure of 16 S rRNA in Escherichia coli ribosomes, using a set of structure-sensitive chemical probes. Ten mutant strains were studied, which contained alterations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12, including double mutants containing both altered S4 and S12. Two ribosomal ambiguity (ram) S4 mutant strains, four streptomycin resistant (SmR) S12 mutant strains, one streptomycin pseudodependent (SmP) S12 mutant strain, one streptomycin dependent (SmD) S12 mutant strain and two streptomycin independent (Sm1) double mutants (containing both-SmD and ram mutations) were probed and compared to an isogenic wild-type strain. In ribosomes from strains containing S4 ram mutations, nucleotides A8 and A26 become more reactive to dimethyl sulfate (DMS) at their N-1 positions. In ribosomes from strains bearing the SmD allele, A908, A909, A1413 and G1487 are significantly less reactive to chemical probes. These same effects are observed when the S4 and S12 mutations are present simultaneously in the double mutants. An interesting correlation is found between the reactivity of A908 and the miscoding potential of SmR, SmD, SmP and wild-type ribosomes; the reactivity of A908 increases as the translational error frequency of the ribosomes increases. In the case of ram ribosomes, the reactivity of A908 resembles that of wild-type, unless tRNA is bound, in which case it becomes hyper-reactive. Similarly, streptomycin has little effect on A908 in wild-type ribosomes unless tRNA is bound, in which case its reactivity increases to resemble that of ram ribosomes with bound tRNA. Finally, interaction of streptomycin with SmP and SmD ribosomes causes the reactivity of A908 to increase to near-wild-type levels. A simple model is proposed, in which the reactivity of A908 reflects the position of an equilibrium between two conformational states of the 30 S subunit, one of which is DMS-reactive, and the other DMS-unreactive. In this model, the balance between these two states would be influenced by proteins S4 and S12. Mutations in S12 generally cause a shift toward the unreactive conformer, and in the case of SmD and SmP ribosomes, this shift can be suppressed phenotypically by streptomycin, ram mutations in protein S4 cause a shift toward the reactive conformer, but only when tRNA is bound. This suggests that the opposing effects of these two classes of mutations influence the proof-reading process by somewhat different mechanisms.

Autoradiography↗
PubMed2005

Translation initiation by factor-independent binding of eukaryotic ribosomes to internal ribosomal entry sites.

Two exceptional mechanisms of eukaryotic translation initiation have recently been identified that differ fundamentally from the canonical factor-mediated, end-dependent mechanism of ribosomal attachment to mRNA. Instead, ribosomal 40S subunits bind in a factor-independent manner to the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) in an mRNA. These two mechanisms are exemplified by initiation on the unrelated approximately 300 nt.-long Hepatitis C virus (HCV) IRES and the approximately 200 nt.-long cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) intergenic region (IGR) IRES, respectively. Ribosomal binding involves interaction with multiple non-contiguous sites on these IRESs, and therefore also differs from the factor-independent attachment of prokaryotic ribosomes to mRNA, which involves base-pairing to the linear Shine-Dalgarno sequence. The HCV IRES binds to the solvent side of the 40S subunit, docks a domain of the IRES into the ribosomal exit (E) site and places the initiation codon in the ribosomal peptidyl (P) site. Subsequent binding of eIF3 and the eIF2-GTP/initiator tRNA complex to form a 48S complex is followed by subunit joining to form an 80S ribosome. The CrPV IRES binds to ribosomes in a very different manner, by occupying the ribosomal E and P sites in the intersubunit cavity, thereby excluding initiator tRNA. Ribosomes enter the elongation stage of translation directly, without any involvement of initiator tRNA or initiation factors, following recruitment of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal aminoacyl (A) site and translocation of it to the P site.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

The effect of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 on the translational specificity of bacterial ribosomes.

Ribosomes from Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli exhibit non-specific translation of bacterial mRNAs. That is, they are able to translate mRNAs from a variety of sources in a manner independent of the "strength" of the Shine-Dalgarno region, in contrast to ribosomes from many Gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis, which show specific translation in only being able to translate other Gram-positive mRNA, or mRNAs that have "strong" Shine-Dalgarno regions. There is an evolutionary correlation between the translational specificity and the absence of a protein analogous to E. coli ribosomal protein S1. The specificity observed with B. subtilis ribosomes is a function of their 30 S subunit which lacks S1; translation of Gram-negative mRNA can occur with heterologous ribosomes containing the 30 S subunit of E. coli ribosomes and the 50 S subunit of B. subtilis ribosomes. However, the addition of E. coli S1 alone to B. subtilis ribosome does not overcome their characteristic inability to translate mRNA from Gram-negative organisms. By contrast, the removal of S1 from E. coli ribosomes results in translational behavior similar to that shown by B. subtilis ribosomes in that the S1-depleted E. coli ribosomes can translate mRNA from Gram-positive sources in the absence of added S1, although addition of S1 stimulates further translation of such mRNAs by the E. coli ribosomes.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1995

Interaction of yeast elongation factor 3 with polynucleotides, ribosomal RNA and ribosomal subunits.

In addition to the two usual eukaryotic elongation factors (EF-1 alpha and EF-2) fungal ribosomes need a third protein, elongation factor 3, for translation. EF-3 is essential for in vivo and in vitro protein synthesis. Functionally, EF-3 stimulates EF-1 alpha dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A site when E site is occupied by deacylated tRNA. EF-3 has intrinsic ATPase activity which is regulated by the functional state of the ribosome. EF-3 ATPase is activated by both 40S and 60S ribosomal subunits. However intact 80S ribosomes are needed for efficient activation of EF-3 ATPase. EF-3 appears to be an RNA binding protein with high affinity for polynucleotides containing guanosine rich sequences. To determine whether guanosine rich sequence of ribosomal RNA is involved in EF-3 binding, an antisense oligonucleotide dC6 was used to block EF-3 interaction with the ribosome. The oligonucleotide suppresses activation of EF-3 ATPase by 40S ribosomal subunit and not by the 60S or the 80S particles. Poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis by yeast ribosomes is inhibited by dC6. To define the binding site of the oligonucleotide and presumably of EF-3 on 18S ribosomal RNA, hydrolysis of rRNA by RNase H was followed in the presence of dC6. These experiments reveal an RNase H cleavage site at 1094GGGGGG1099 sequence of 18S ribosomal RNA. This guanosine rich sequence of rRNA is suggested to be involved in EF-3 binding to yeast ribosome. Data presented in this communication suggest that the activity of EF-3 involved a direct interaction with the guanosine rich sequence of rRNA.

Fungal Proteins↗
PubMed2005

Mapping the interaction of SmpB with ribosomes by footprinting of ribosomal RNA.

In trans-translation transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA) and small protein B (SmpB) rescue ribosomes stalled on truncated or in other ways problematic mRNAs. SmpB promotes the binding of tmRNA to the ribosome but there is uncertainty about the number of participating SmpB molecules as well as their ribosomal location. Here, the interaction of SmpB with ribosomal subunits and ribosomes was studied by isolation of SmpB containing complexes followed by chemical modification of ribosomal RNA with dimethyl sulfate, kethoxal and hydroxyl radicals. The results show that SmpB binds 30S and 50S subunits with 1:1 molar ratios and the 70S ribosome with 2:1 molar ratio. SmpB-footprints are similar on subunits and the ribosome. In the 30S subunit, SmpB footprints nucleotides that are in the vicinity of the P-site facing the E-site, and in the 50S subunit SmpB footprints nucleotides that are located below the L7/L12 stalk in the 3D structure of the ribosome. Based on these results, we suggest a mechanism where two molecules of SmpB interact with tmRNA and the ribosome during trans-translation. The first SmpB molecule binds near the factor-binding site on the 50S subunit helping tmRNA accommodation on the ribosome, whereas the second SmpB molecule may functionally substitute for a missing anticodon stem-loop in tmRNA during later steps of trans-translation.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Release of ribosome-bound ribosome recycling factor by elongation factor G.

Elongation factor G (EF-G) and ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassemble post-termination complexes of ribosome, mRNA, and tRNA. RRF forms stable complexes with 70 S ribosomes and 50 S ribosomal subunits. Here, we show that EF-G releases RRF from 70 S ribosomal and model post-termination complexes but not from 50 S ribosomal subunit complexes. The release of bound RRF by EF-G is stimulated by GTP analogues. The EF-G-dependent release occurs in the presence of fusidic acid and viomycin. However, thiostrepton inhibits the release. RRF was shown to bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes in the presence of GTP with much weaker affinity, suggesting that EF-G may move RRF to this position during the release of RRF. On the other hand, RRF did not bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes with fusidic acid, suggesting that EF-G stabilized by fusidic acid does not represent the natural post-termination complex. In contrast, the complexes of ribosome, EF-G and thiostrepton could bind RRF, although with lower affinity. These results suggest that thiostrepton traps an intermediate complex having RRF on a position that clashes with the P/E site bound tRNA. Mutants of EF-G that are impaired for translocation fail to disassemble post-termination complexes and exhibit lower activity in releasing RRF. We propose that the release of ribosome-bound RRF by EF-G is required for post-termination complex disassembly. Before release from the ribosome, the position of RRF on the ribosome will change from the original A/P site to a new location that clashes with tRNA on the P/E site.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗
PubMed1978

Proteins of rough microsomal membranes related to ribosome binding. II. Cross-linking of bound ribosomes to specific membrane proteins exposed at the binding sites.

Two proteins (ribophorins I and II), which are integral components of rough microsomal membranes and appear to be related to the bound ribosomes, were shown to be exposed on the surface of rat liver rough microsomes (RM) and to be in close proximity to the bound ribosomes. Both proteins were labeled when intact RM were incubated with a lactoperoxidase iodinating system, but only ribophorin I was digested during mild trypsinization of intact RM. Ribophorin II (63,000 daltons) was only proteolyzed when the luminal face of the microsomal vesicles was made accessible to trypsin by the addition of sublytical detergent concentrations. Only 30--40% of the bound ribosomes were released during trypsinization on intact RM, but ribosome release was almost complete in the presence of low detergent concentrations. Very low glutaraldehyde concentrations (0.005--0.02%) led to the preferential cross-linking of large ribosomal subunits of bound ribosomes to the microsomal membranes. This cross-linking prevented the release of subunits caused by puromycin in media of high ionic strength, but not the incorporation of [3H]puromycin into nascent polypeptide chains. SDS-acrylamide gel electrophoresis of cross-linked samples a preferential reduction in the intensity of the bands representing the ribophorins and the formation of aggregates which did not penetrate into the gels. At low methyl-4-mercaptobutyrimidate (MMB) concentrations (0.26 mg/ml) only 30% of the ribosomes were cross-linked to the microsomal membranes, as shown by the puromycin-KCl test, but membranes could still be solubilized with 1% DOC. This allowed the isolation of the ribophorins together with the sedimentable ribosomes, as was shown by electrophoresis of the sediments after disruption of the cross-links by reduction. Experiments with RM which contained only inactive ribosomes showed that the presence of nascent chains was not necessary for the reversible cross-linking of ribosomes to the membranes. These observations suggest that ribophorins are in close proximity to the bound ribosomes, as may be expected from components of the ribosome-binding sites.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

The binding of Met-tRNAf to isolated 40-S ribosomal subunits and the formation of Met-tRNAf - 80-S-ribosome initiation complexes.

Different forms of 40-S ribosomal subunit, distinguishable by their buoyant densities on CsCl equilibrium density gradients, are formed when derived 40-S ribosomal subunits are incubated with partially purified reticulocyte ribosomal wash proteins. One of these subunits, the 1.37-g-cm-3 form is not present in the cell but the other two forms, the 1.40-g-cm-3 and 1.40-g-cm-3 subunits, are present in cell extracts. 35S label is bound to 1.37-g-cm-3 and 1.40-g-cm-s subunits when [35S]Met-tRANf, GTP and poly(A,U,G) are included in the incubations. The 35S-labelled 40-S subunits recovered, and the amount of 35S label bound to them, are changed if the [35S]Met-tRNAf-40-S-subunit-poly(A,U,G) complexes are first purified on sucrose gradients before analysing them on CsCl. The 1.37-g-cm-3 particle is no longer seen and the total quantity of 35S label on the 40-S subunits is 90% lower after sucrose gradient purification. Between 30% and 40% of the 40-S subunits bind [35S]Met-tRNAf when 1 mM GTP, an excess of ribosomal wash proteins and [35S]Met-tRNAf over derived 40-S subunits, and poly(A,U,G) or AUG is included in the incubations. The omission of poly(A,U,G) or AUG from the incubations substantially lowers the amount of subunit-bound 35S label ultimately recovered. With these incubations less than 10% of the 40-S subunits have bound [35S]Met-tRNAf. [35S]Met-tRNAf binding is affected by the nature of the RNA added. The addition of poly(U), rRNA and native 9-S golbin mRNA is without effect, whereas denatured globin mRNA is stimulatory. Maximum binding is obtained however with AUG. Poly(A,U,G) is less stimulatory than AUG but more stimulatory than denatured mRNA, suggesting that the number as well the accessibility of the AUG initiations condons determines the amount of 35S label bound. Similar results are obtained for the ribosomal-wash-dependent binding of [35S]Met-tRNAf to 80-S ribosomes. Contrary to the binding results, the ability of mRNA to stimulate protein synthesis is dependent on the integrity of the mRNA. Thus, native 9-S globin mRNA but not poly(A,U,G) stimulatex protein synthesis in the wheat germ system. HCHO-treated globin mRNA, although stimulatory, is 45% less effective than native mRNA. The addition of AUG, derived 60-S subunits and extra ribosomal wash is required for the formation of [35S]Met-tRNAf-80-S-ribosome complexes from sucrose-gradient-purified [35S]Met-tRNAf-40-S-subunit complexes. The 80-S ribosome complexes are able to form peptide bonds. Thus, if puromycin is added to the full incubations at zero time, no 35S label is present on the 80-S ribosome. 35S label is released as methionyl-puromycin. If the [35S]Met-tRNAf-40-S-subunit complexes are assembled with poly(A,U,G) or AUG in the incubations and then purified, only derived 60-S subunits are required to form [35S]Met-tRNAf-80-S-ribosome complexes. 35S label is not released from them when puromycin is added to the incubations unless extra ribosomal wash is also added.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Vigilin is co-localized with 80S ribosomes and binds to the ribosomal complex through its C-terminal domain.

The biological relevance of vigilin a ubiquitous multi (KH)-domain protein is still barely understood. Investigations over the last years, however, provided evidence for a possible involvement of vigilin in the nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of tRNA and in the subsequent association of tRNA with ribosomes. We therefore investigated the potential association of vigilin with 80S ribosomes. Immunostaining, gel filtration, westernblot analysis of polyribosomes and high salt treatment of 80S ribosomes isolated from fresh human placenta were applied to analyze the possible association of vigilin with ribosomes. Overlay assays were performed to examine whether vigilin is capable of binding to ribosomal proteins. Immunostaining of HEp-2 cells, gel filtration of a cytoplasmic extract of HEp-2 cells and westernblot analysis of isolated 80S ribosomes clearly demonstrate that vigilin is bond to the ribosomal complex. Vigilin detaches from the ribosomal complex under the influence of high salt concentrations. We present data that radioactively labeled human vigilin interacts directly with a subset of ribosomal proteins from both subunits. We were able to narrow down the putative binding region to the C-terminal domain by using vigilin mutant constructs. Therefore our results provide strong evidence that vigilin is bond to the ribosomal complex and underline the hypothesis that vigilin might be involved in the link between tRNA-export and the channeled tRNA-cycle on ribosomes.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗