Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Protective Devices”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

An evaluation of respiratory protective devices used in children's evacuation.

This study evaluated respiratory protective devices (RPDs) used in children's evacuation. The RPDs evaluated were either a protective jacket or a protective mask. One hundred and sixty children participated. Half were evacuated from home with the help of their parents, whereas the other half were evacuated from day-care centres with the help of staff. In all, 65% of the children were evacuated wearing their RPDs. No significant differences were found between the two environments, but significantly more children (75%) kept the mask on than the jacket (55%). However, many more cases of improper fit after dressing were observed with the mask than with the jacket. Speech communication was observed to be reduced for 58% of the children, wearing the mask, and slightly more for those wearing the jacket. Children who did not evacuate with the RPDs on were observed to be more anxious and adults' attitudes towards them were rated as more neutral, whereas children who successfully evacuated were less anxious and adults' attitudes towards them were rated both as more positive and as more negative.

Child↗
PubMed1995

Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and direct of two protective devices-a shielded 3 ml safety syringe (Safety-Lok; Becton Dickinson and Co., Becton Dickinson Division, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) and the components of a needleless IV system (InterLink; Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield, Ill.)--in preventing needlestick injuries to health care workers. DESIGN: Twelve-month prospective, controlled, before-and-after trial with a standardized questionnaire to monitor needlestick injury rates. SETTING: Six hospital inpatient units, consisting of three medical units, two surgical units (all of which were similar in patient census, acuity, and frequency of needlesticks), and a surgical-trauma intensive care unit, at a 900-bed urban university medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All nursing personnel, including registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, nursing aides, and students, as well as medical teams consisting of an attending physician, resident physician, interns, and medical students on the study units. INTERVENTION: After a 6-month prospective surveillance period, the protective devices were randomly introduced to four of the chosen study units and to the surgical-trauma intensive care unit. RESULTS: Forty-seven needlesticks were reported throughout the entire study period, 33 in the 6 months before and 14 in the 6 months after the introduction of the protective devices. Nursing staff members who were using hollow-bore needles and manipulating intravenous lines accounted for the greatest number of needlestick injuries in the pre-intervention period. The overall rate of needlestick injury was reduced by 61%, from 0.785 to 0.303 needlestick injuries per 1000 health care worker-days after the introduction of the protective devices (relative risk = 1.958; 95% confidence interval, 1.012 to 3.790; p = 0.046). Needlestick injury rates associated with intravenous line manipulation, procedures with 3 ml syringes, and sharps disposal were reduced by 50%; however, reductions in these subcategories were not statistically significant. No seroconversions to HIV-1 or hepatitis B virus seropositivity occurred among those with needlestick injuries. The direct cost for each needlestick prevented was $789. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an overall reduction in needlestick injury rates, no statistically significant reductions could be directly attributed to the protective devices. These devices are associated with a significant increase in cost compared with conventional devices. Further studies must be concurrently controlled to establish the effectiveness of these devices.

Direct Service Costs↗
PubMed1997

Environmental awareness and level-dependent hearing protection devices.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of level-dependent hearing protection devices (HPDs) on subjects' ability to identify real-life environmental sounds was investigated. DESIGN: Eighteen subjects with no hunting experience attempted to identify sounds (crow, duck, turkey, deer, owl, goose, and person) recorded at various distances in the presence of the SoundScope and Sonic II level-dependent HPDs as well as in an open ear condition. Knowles Electronic's Manikin for Auditory Research was employed in making the experimental recordings. The Sonic II accomplishes level-dependent attenuation via a passive mechanism, whereas the SoundScope employs active circuitry that attenuates loud sounds while providing a small amount of high frequency amplification for soft sounds. Both devices are commercially available and are advertised for hunters/shooters. Sound identification scores (SISs) were determined for each condition. RESULTS: Mean SISs differed significantly among the three earplug conditions, collapsed over type of sound and distance, with the best SIS obtained under the open ear condition (96.43%) and the worst under the Sonic II condition (84.13%). Further analysis revealed that the listening conditions differed significantly only at the 100 yard distance. CONCLUSIONS: Auditory awareness was not maintained by either device investigated during the 100 yard condition. However, auditory awareness was maintained by both devices at a distance of 75 yards or closer. These devices may be appropriate for use in certain hunting/shooting situations depending on several factors including type of game being hunted, environment, and shooting range of the weapon. Further support also is provided for the usage of level-dependent HPDs during recreational shooting activities (i.e., at a shooting range).

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The incubator as a chemical warfare protective device in neonatal intensive care units.

During the Persian Gulf war chemical warfare (CW) protective devices were distributed to the entire population of Israel. Neonates were to be placed in a protective infant carrier (PIC) or an improved PIC ("active PIC") to which filtered air was actively introduced by a blower. The specific needs of low birthweight babies hospitalized in intensive care units and treated in incubators were not adequately addressed. Transfer to a PIC meant disconnecting the infants from life-supporting systems and monitoring devices and exposing them to changes in ambient temperature. To overcome this difficulty the original incubator was used as a CW protective device. Its ports were sealed and low-grade positive pressure was created. This avoided transfer of the neonates from their controlled environment, reduced physiological stress, and improved medical supervision.

Air Pollution↗
PubMed2004

[Evolution of radiation exposure to operator in diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures and reduction of radiation exposure to operator with protective device].

A study was performed to evaluate operator dose during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures (IVR) and to establish methods of operator dose reduction with a radiation protective device. Operator dose was measured by glass dosimeters worn on the neck and on the abdomen outside the lead apron. In addition, the dose of the primary beam at the collimator surface was measured, which made it possible to define the correlation between the entrance air kerma, measured with Skin Dose Monitor, and operator dose exposed during the monitored procedure. IVR protectors were developed to decrease the amount of scatter radiation received by operators performing the procedures, and their effects were evaluated in abdominal and cardiac angiography procedures. The average effective dose and doses of the neck and abdomen outside the lead apron, estimated for individual procedures, were as follows: abdominal angiography procedures: effective dose, 0.07 mSv; neck area, 0.18 mSv; abdominal area, 0.51 mSv; cardiac angiography procedures: effective dose, 0.07 mSv; neck area, 0.13 mSv; abdominal area, 0.68 mSv. Operator doses were well correlated with exposure dose in abdominal angiography procedures (diagnostic procedure r=0.84, IVR r=0.77). It was found that 68.0% of the effective dose in abdominal angiography procedures and 43.0% of the effective dose in cardiac angiography procedures could be reduced by the use of IVR protectors. Operator and patient doses in interventional radiology were interdependent. The minimization of operator doses is particularly important during interventional radiology, and it is necessary to be aware of practical radiation protection procedures. Measures that reduce patient dose will also reduce occupational exposure. Moreover, operator dose could be substantially reduced by the use of IVR protectors in addition to wearing a protective lead apron during IVR. It was suggested that IVR protectors are effective radiation protective devices in interventional radiology procedures.

Angiography↗
PubMed1994

Knowledge and attitudes of a group of South African mine workers towards noise induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protective devices.

The study aimed to explore the knowledge and attitudes of a group of mine workers regarding noise induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protective devices. These aims were investigated via a questionnaire administered in a group setting to 55 underground mine workers. The main finding that emerged from the study was that respondents were poorly informed regarding the fact that noise was a health hazard. Furthermore, the knowledge that respondents did possess, appeared to have been derived from the personal experience of working in noisy environments for many years, rather than from educational input. Contrary to expectations, respondents did not view deafness as a status symbol but rather as a negative attribute. Consequently, they were motivated to protect themselves from hearing impairment and to be educated about hearing and the effects of noise. The mine workers complained about discomfort when wearing hearing protective devices as well as feelings of insecurity due to inhibition of communication and the inability to hear warning signals. For these reasons, noise protection was mainly worn in situations perceived as noisy by workers themselves. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for the clinical practice of audiology; hearing conservation in the mining industry; further research; and the training and education of speech-language pathologists and audiologists.

Ear Protective Devices↗
PubMed2000

Endovascular treatment of experimental aneurysms by use of a combination of liquid embolic agents and protective devices.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of liquid embolic agents for embolization of cerebral aneurysms has been reported in the neurosurgical literature. The most important limitation of this technique is the relatively poor control of migration of the liquid embolic agent into the parent artery. We performed an experimental aneurysm study using a liquid embolic agent and different protective devices to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of this endovascular technique. METHODS: Forty lateral aneurysms were surgically constructed on 20 common carotid arteries of swine. Onyx alone was used to obliterate eight aneurysms. Onyx was also used in combination with microcoils (n = 11), microstents (n = 6), balloons inflated proximally to the neck of the aneurysm (n = 6), and across the neck of the aneurysm (n = 7). One control aneurysm was embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) alone. RESULTS: The use of a microballoon across the neck of the aneurysm, a microstent deployed across the neck of the aneurysm, or the deposit of GDCs into the aneurysm allowed faster and more complete filling of the aneurysm with Onyx. However, these protection devices did not totally preclude intractable migration of Onyx into the parent artery (migration rate, 9-33%). CONCLUSION: Although complete occlusion of experimental aneurysms with Onyx is feasible using protective devices, migration of the liquid embolic agent into the parent artery or intracranially remains a difficult challenge. Further experimental studies need to be performed to master this technique and to select those aneurysms that can be safely treated in clinical practice.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

An evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protection devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB.

Three hearing protection devices [Siebe Norton Com-fit earplug, Flents Silenta model 080 earmuff, and E-A-R foam earplug] were compared for their effectiveness in preventing both daily temporary threshold shifts (TTS) and threshold variability between sequential annual audiograms for workers in an industrial environment with a TWA of 107 dB. Com-fit wearers showed significant TTS at 500-4000 Hz from the beginning to the end of the workday. Silenta wearers displayed significant TTS at 500 Hz and nonsignificant improvement at 6000 Hz. E-A-R wearers showed significant TTS at 1000-2000 Hz and nonsignificant improvement at 3000-6000 Hz. Statistical analysis indicated that the protection provided by the E-A-R plug was significantly better than that of the Com-fit plug at 500-4000 Hz, and significantly better than the protection of the Silenta muff at 500, 3000, and 4000 Hz. Employees' last four annual audiograms prior to the start of the TTS study were evaluated to compare the wearer groups' mean values of the %BWs statistic (sequential percent better or worse). Previous research indicates that the %BWs statistic for a properly protected population with past audiometric test experience will be less than 30%. The E-A-R group showed an acceptable %BWs value (26%), but the Silenta wearers (45%) and Com-fit wearers (53%) showed excess threshold variability in threshold measurements from year to year.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for treatment of carotid stenosis has not received wide acceptance because of the availability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with its excellent results and because of the risk of embolic stroke associated with CAS. The feasibility and efficacy of cerebral protection devices that may prevent such embolic complications have yet to be shown. We report our initial results with CAS performed with cerebral protection. METHODS: For a period of 28 months, 31 patients with carotid artery stenosis, most of whom were considered at high risk for CEA (87%), underwent treatment with CAS in conjunction with either the PercuSurge GuardWire (n = 19; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn), the Cordis Angioguard filter (n = 7; Cordis, Warren, NJ), or the ArteriA Parodi Anti-embolization catheter (n = 4; ArteriA, San Francisco, Calif) with US Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemptions. Factors that made CEA high risk included restenosis after CEA (n = 6), hostile neck (n = 6), high or low lesions (n = 4), and severe comorbid medical conditions (n = 11). Preoperative neurologic symptoms were present in 58%, and the mean stenosis was 85% +/- 12%. Data were prospectively recorded and analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Neurologic evaluation was performed before and after CAS by a protocol neurologist. RESULTS: CAS was performed with local anesthesia with the Wallstent (n = 23; Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, Mass) or the PRECISE carotid stent (n = 7; Cordis) in conjunction with one of the protection devices in an operating room with a mobile C-arm. Each patient received dual antiplatelet therapy before surgery. The overall technical success rate was 97% (30/31). In one patient, the lesion could not be crossed with a guidewire because of a severely stenosed and tortuous lesion. This patient was not a candidate for CEA and was treated conservatively. In the remaining 30 cases, CAS had a good angiographic result (residual stenosis, <10%). All patients tolerated the protection device well, and no intraprocedural neurologic complications occurred. Macroscopic embolic particles were recovered from each case. One patient (3%) with a severely tortuous vessel had a major stroke immediately after CAS, and no deaths occurred. The combined 30 day stroke/death rate was 3%. During a mean follow-up period of 17 months, one subacute occlusion of the stent occurred but did not result in a stroke. Three other patients had duplex scan-proven in-stent restenosis, and two underwent treatment with repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with a good result. No patient had a stroke during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: CAS with cerebral protection devices can be performed safely with a high technical success rate. Although many patients who underwent treatment with CAS were at high risk, the neurologic complication rate was low and CAS appears to be an acceptable treatment option for select patients at high risk for CEA. Tight lesions and tortuous anatomy may make the use of distal protection devices difficult. Further study is warranted.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Selecting an adequate respiratory protective device: the choice between a respirator and breathing apparatus.

An adequate respiratory protective device should keep the concentration of the pollutant inside the facepiece below the appropriate occupational exposure limit. Filtering respirators will not provide adequate protection if the device fails in an atmosphere which is immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH). It has therefore been suggested that in contaminant concentrations above an IDLH level it is more appropriate to select breathing apparatus with an emergency breathing facility. In this paper IDLH levels published by the US National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health have been compared with UK occupational exposure limits. For some substances there was a relatively small difference between the IDLH level and the short-term occupational exposure limit (STEL). The median ratio of the IDLH level to the STEL was 10 for gases and vapours and 50 for aerosols. For almost half the substances with UK occupational exposure limits there is no IDLH value. It is concluded that the published IDLH concentrations are, on their own, an insufficient basis for selecting breathing apparatus over a filtering respirator. It is equally important to consider the likelihood that a filtering device may fail catastrophically since this determines the risk from wearing a respirator in an IDLH atmosphere. More emphasis should be placed on the control of potentially high exposure levels by means other than respiratory protection.

Equipment Failure↗
PubMed1975

The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.

The effectiveness of a hearing conservation program, and specifically the effectiveness of hearing protection devices (muffs in this case), was investigated over a five-year period, since the inception of the program at a major plant of the Ingersoll-Rand Company. The study concentrated on three groups (Class I, II, and III) of 213 employees whose noise level exposure did not change during the five-year study period. A hearing conservation criterion of 90dBA was utilized. One group consisted of office workers in which the level was well below this, a second group from a machine shop in which the level was slightly below the criterion, and a third group from foundry areas in which the levels were considerably above the 90dBA level. Personal ear protection was worn during the study period only by the last group. The mean differences in hearing levels were insignificant and were essentially the same in the three groups, at each frequency, and regardless of the baseline hearing thresholds. It is apparent that there were no significant changes in hearing threshodls during the study period among a non-noise exposed group; a mild to moderate noise-exposed group; and a group exposed to high levels of steady state noise, but wearing ear protectors. These results indicate that a hearing conservation program which includes audiometric testing and personal ear protection, utilizing a hearing conservation criterion of approximately 90dBA, does adequately protect the hearing of noise-exposed workers.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

An investigation into the effect of protective devices on the dose to radiosensitive organs in the head and neck.

A series of experiments were performed to determine the dose reduction afforded to radiosensitive organs in the head and neck by various protective devices. These included spectacles with plastic, standard glass, photochromic and lead-glass lenses, a thyroid collar and a lead-acrylic face mask. The measurements were performed using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosemeters, in conditions realistic of clinical practice. Irradiations were performed using scattered radiation produced by a pelvic phantom, for X-ray beams generated at 80 kVp and 110 KVp. It was found that the reduction in dose to the lens of the eye ranged between 0% and 97%, whilst the dose to the thyroid and oesophagus was reduced by between 76% and 97%, and was dependent on the protective device and tube potential employed. A reduction in brain dose of up to 81% was also measured, for the lead-acrylic face mask. Also presented is the ratio of organ dose to dose to the bridge of the nose for thyroid, oesophagus, brain and sinuses, as measured for the case of no head or neck protection.

Brain↗
PubMed2004

Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.

The mandate of ASA Working Group S12/WG11 has been to develop "laboratory and/or field procedure(s) that yield useful estimates of field performance" of hearing protection devices (HPDs). A real-ear attenuation at threshold procedure was selected, devised, tested for one earmuff and three earplugs via an interlaboratory study involving five laboratories and 147 subjects, and incorporated into a new standard that was approved in 1997 [Royster et al., "Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S 12, Noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1506-1526; ANSI, S12.6-1997, "American National Standard method for measuring real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors" (American National Standards Institute, New York, 1997)]. The subject-fit methodology of ANSI S12.6-1997 relies upon listeners who are audiometrically proficient, but inexperienced in the use of HPDs. Whenever a new method is adopted, it is important to know the effects of variability on the power of the measurements. In evaluation of protector noise reduction determined by experimenter-fit, informed-user-fit, and subject-fit methods, interlaboratory reproducibility was found to be best for the subject-fit method. Formulas were derived for determining the minimum detectable difference between attenuation measurements and for determining the number of subjects necessary to achieve a selected level of precision. For a precision of 6 dB, the study found that the minimum number of subjects was 4 for the Bilsom UF-1 earmuff, 10 for the E.A.R Classic earplug, 31 for the Willson EP100 earplug, and 22 for the PlasMed V-51R earplug.

Auditory Threshold↗
PubMed1998

Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.

The mandate of ASA Working Group S12/WG11 has been to develop "laboratory and/or field procedure(s) that yield useful estimates of field performance" of hearing protection devices (HPDs). A real-ear attenuation at threshold procedure was selected, devised, tested via an interlaboratory study, and incorporated into a draft standard that was approved in 1997 [J. D. Royster et at., "Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1506-1526 (1996); ANSI S12.6-1997, "American National Standard Methods for Measuring Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors" (American National Standards Institute, New York, 1997)]. The real-world estimation procedure utilizes a subject-fit methodology with listeners who are audiometrically proficient, but inexperienced in the use of HPDs. A key factor in the decision to utilize the subject-fit method was an evaluation of the representativeness of the laboratory data vis-à-vis attenuation values achieved by workers in practice. Twenty-two field studies were reviewed to develop a data base for comparison purposes. Results indicated that laboratory subject-fit attenuation values were typically equivalent to or greater than the field attenuation values, and yielded a better estimate of those values than did experimenter-fit or experimenter-supervised fit types of results. Recent data which are discussed in the paper, but which were not available at the time of the original analyses, confirm the findings.

Auditory Threshold↗
PubMed2006

Effect of distal protection device on the microvascular integrity in acute myocardial infarction during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The use of a distal protection device during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may preserve the microvascular integrity of the myocardium. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 58 consecutive patients with AMI, who had undergone primary PCI within 24 h after onset, were enrolled (30 patients with the PercuSurge GuardWire System, 28 without). The coronary flow velocity reserve was not different between the 2 groups. In patients with a distal protection device, the post-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction myocardial perfusion grades (TMP) were more favorable (TMP 0/1: 13.3%, TMP 2: 23.3%, TMP 3: 63.4% vs TMP 0/1: 35.7%, TMP 2: 35.7%, TMP 3: 28.6%, p=0.023). These patients also exhibited lower basal and hyperemic microvascular resistance index levels (4.33+/-2.22 vs 5.55+/-2.36 mmHg . cm(-1) . s, p=0.047; 2.39+/-1.40 vs 3.14+/-1.36 mmHg . cm(-1) . s, p=0.045, respectively), and longer basal diastolic deceleration time (679+/-273 vs 519+/-289 ms, p=0.035) after PCI. CONCLUSION: Distal protection with the PercuSurge GuardWire system may effectively preserve the microvascular integrity of the myocardium during primary PCI in AMI patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Contingent application of a protective device to treat the severe self-biting behavior of a disturbed autistic child.

This study introduces the Bubble Helmet, a protective device, as an effective means of treating severe cases of self-biting behavior with disturbed developmentally disabled persons. The apparatus is a clear plastic sphere which fastens over the client's head, shielding the mouth from contact with hands and forearms. Use of the bubble in a response-contingent manner effectively eliminated the intense self-biting behavior of a 9-year-old autistic child in a community-based group home. This made it possible for her to be placed in a less restrictive community facility.

Autistic Disorder↗
PubMed2004

Choice of protection devices in carotid angioplasty. Two case reports.

Patient selection is of the utmost importance with all endovascular procedures. It is equally important to select the appropriate protection device during carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS). CAS in two patients was unsuccessful due to the chosen protection device. Occlusion of the external carotid artery while deploying a Parodi Anti-Embolic-System Device (PAEC - ArteriA) resulted in cerebral ischaemia. Conversion to the Angioguard System (Cordis) made carotid angioplasty possible, but was complicated by thrombosis of the filter. In the second case it was impossible to negotiate tortuous vessels with the Angioguard system. Our experience illustrates that both devices have limitations. Choosing the wrong device may have serious consequences.

Aged↗