Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Propafenone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Limited role of intravenous propafenone hydrochloride in the treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia: electrophysiologic effects and results of programmed ventricular stimulation.

The electrophysiologic effects and response to programmed ventricular stimulation of intravenous propafenone, an experimental antiarrhythmic agent, were studied in a group of 14 patients with both clinical and induced sustained ventricular tachycardia. Twelve of the 14 patients had not responded to conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Propafenone had no significant effect on sinus cycle length (836 +/- 170 ms before and 750 +/- 124 ms after propafenone), P wave duration (108 +/- 24 ms before and 106 +/- 23 ms after propafenone) or PR interval (181 +/- 45 ms before and 194 +/- 53 ms after propafenone). QRS duration and ventricular effective refractory periods increased significantly (109 +/- 20 to 130 +/- 21 ms and 235 +/- 24 to 256 +/- 19 ms, respectively). Ventricular tachycardia remained inducible or occurred spontaneously in 13 of 14 patients after propafenone administration. Neither mode of initiation nor mode of termination of ventricular tachycardia was predictably altered. Additional forms of ventricular tachycardia were seen in six patients. Cycle length of ventricular tachycardia was 303 +/- 73 ms before and 346 +/- 143 ms after propafenone (p = NS). In conclusion, intravenous propafenone does not significantly affect sinus rate, intraatrial conduction or atrioventricular conduction. Ventricular refractoriness and intraventricular conduction are prolonged. The mode of initiation, mode of termination and ventricular tachycardia cycle length are not predictably altered, but ventricular tachycardia occasionally occurs spontaneously after propafenone. Intravenous propafenone rarely prevents induction of ventricular tachycardia in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic agents.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed1987

Double-blind study of intravenous propafenone for paroxysmal supraventricular reentrant tachycardia.

Propafenone was administered during electrophysiologic testing to determine its efficacy and safety for terminating and preventing reinduction of paroxysmal supraventricular reentrant tachycardia. Four men and 10 women (mean age 50 years, range 28 to 69) were studied. Five patients had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with orthodromic atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia, three had a concealed accessory pathway with AV reentrant tachycardia and six had tachycardia due to reentry within the AV node. In the five patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, propafenone terminated reentrant tachycardia in three (the tachycardia was reinducible in one) and had no effect in two. In the three patients with a concealed accessory pathway, propafenone terminated reentrant tachycardia in all three and prevented reinduction of the tachycardia in two. In the six patients with tachycardia due to reentry within the AV node, propafenone terminated and prevented reinduction of reentrant tachycardia. Propafenone had no effect on blood pressure, heart rate, PA interval, AV node refractoriness or rate of reentrant tachycardia. Propafenone significantly (p less than 0.05) prolonged the AH, HV, QRS and ventriculoatrial intervals and decreased the AV node Wenckebach rate. Of the nine patients receiving long-term oral propafenone therapy, eight had a reduction of at least 90% in reentrant tachycardia during a mean follow-up period of 14.5 months (range 11 to 22); all eight patients had had noninducible reentrant tachycardia after intravenous propafenone. One patient had increased frequency of reentrant tachycardia; this patient had had inducible reentrant tachycardia after intravenous propafenone. In conclusion, intravenously administered propafenone terminated reentrant tachycardia in 85% of patients and prevented reinduction in 71%, with no adverse hemodynamic effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Enzyme induction in the elderly: effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone.

OBJECTIVE: A clinical study on enzyme induction in elderly subjects was performed by investigation of the effect of rifampin (INN, rifampicin) on propafenone disposition. Propafenone was chosen as a model drug because of its complex metabolism that permits the simultaneous in vivo assessment of induction of phase 1 and phase 2 pathways. METHODS: Six extensive metabolizers of CYP2D6 (age, 70.5 +/- 3.5 years) ingested 600 mg rifampin once daily for 9 consecutive days. One day before the first rifampin dose and on the day of the last rifampin dose, each elderly individual received a single intravenous infusion of 70 mg unlabeled propafenone and received a single oral dose of 300 mg deuterated propafenone 2 hours later. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone were compared before and during induction. RESULTS: Maximum QRS prolongation after oral propafenone was decreased significantly by rifampin (18% +/- 5% versus 6% +/- 3%; P < .01). There were no substantial differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous propafenone during induction. However, bioavailability of propafenone dropped from 30% +/- 24% to 4% +/- 3% (P < .05). After oral propafenone was administered, clearances through N-dealkylation (6 +/- 3 mL/min versus 26 +/- 16 mL/min; P < .05) and glucuronidation (178 +/- 75 mL/min versus 739 +/- 533 mL/min; P < .05), but not 5-hydroxylation, were increased by rifampin, indicating substantial enzyme induction. CONCLUSIONS: Both phase 1 and phase 2 pathways of propafenone metabolism were induced by rifampin in elderly subjects, resulting in a clinically relevant drug interaction.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between mexiletine and propafenone in human beings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Mexiletine and propafenone are often used concomitantly and are metabolized by the same cytochrome P450 isozymes, namely CYP2D6, CYP1A2, and probably CYP3A4. Our objective was to study the potential pharmacokinetic and electrophysiological interactions between mexiletine and propafenone. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers, 8 extensive metabolizers and 7 poor metabolizers of CYP2D6, received oral doses of mexiletine 100 mg two times daily from day 1 to day 8 and oral doses of propafenone 150 mg two times daily from day 5 to day 12. Interdose studies were performed at steady-state on mexiletine alone (day 4), mexiletine plus propafenone (day 8), and propafenone alone (day 12). RESULTS: In subjects in the extensive metabolizer group, coadministration of propafenone decreased oral clearances of R-(-)-mexiletine (from 41+/-11 L/h to 28+/-7 L/h) and S-(+)-mexiletine (from 43+/-15 L/h to 29+/-11 L/h) to an extent such that these values were no longer different between the extensive and the poor metabolizer groups. Propafenone coadministration also decreased partial metabolic clearances of mexiletine to hydroxymethylmexiletine, p-hydroxymexiletine, and m-hydroxymexiletine in extensive metabolizers by 71%, 67%, and 73%, respectively. In contrast, propafenone did not alter the kinetics of mexiletine enantiomers in subjects in the poor metabolizer group except for a slight decrease in the formation of hydroxymethylmexiletine. Pharmacokinetic parameters of propafenone were not changed during concomitant administration of mexiletine in subjects of either phenotype. Finally, electrocardiographic parameters (QRS duration, QTc, RR, and PR intervals) were not modified during the combined administration of the drugs. CONCLUSION: Propafenone is a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor that may cause an increase in plasma concentrations of coadministered CYP2D6 substrates.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

Plasma propafenone concentration in the evaluation of anti-arrhythmic efficacy.

The anti-arrhythmic drug efficacy of oral propafenone therapy (300 mg to 900 mg per day) was studied in relation to propafenone and hydroxy-propafenone plasma concentrations in 70 outpatients (46 males, 24 females, mean age 57 +/- 12 years) followed up for 24 +/- 32 months. On average 1.7 plasma concentration measurements were performed per patient. The arrhythmias were effectively controlled in 32 patients, but in another 32 patients propafenone therapy was ineffective; in six patients the evaluation was unclear. The therapy was effective in 66% of patients with ventricular premature beats, in 50% with complex ventricular arrhythmias, in 40% with ventricular tachycardia and in 20% with supraventricular tachycardia. Fifty per cent of patients with coronary heart disease and electrical disease, but only 20% with dilated cardiomyopathy and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome were effectively treated. Measurement of peak plasma propafenone levels performed 4.5 +/- 2 h after oral drug administration revealed no statistically significant dose-plasma concentration relation. Optimal propafenone drug efficacy was documented at propafenone plasma concentrations ranging from 0.20 to 0.60 micrograms/ml (63% of patients considered as effectively treated). There was a trend to decrease propafenone efficacy at plasma concentrations below 0.20 micrograms/ml and above 0.60 micrograms/ml. Analysis of hydroxypropafenone identified four patients as poor metabolizers with unusually high propafenone and low hydroxypropafenone plasma concentrations; only one of these four patients showed drug efficacy. Monitoring of propafenone and hydroxypropafenone plasma concentrations was a practical procedure to assess patient's compliance, to identify poor metabolizers and to guide anti-arrhythmic drug therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Electrophysiological mechanism for the antiarrhythmic action of propafenone: a comparison with mexiletine.

1. The antiarrhythmic potency of propafenone was evaluated in the guinea-pig isolated heart; arrhythmias were induced with (a) digitalis intoxication and (b) hypoxia followed by reoxygenation. 2. Propafenone, 0.5 microM, was found to be the minimal but effective antiarrhythmic concentration. The antiarrhythmic activity of propafenone developed slower than that of 10 microM mexiletine, which was the lowest effective concentration under the same experimental conditions. 3. The electrophysiological effects of propafenone were then studied on sheep cardiac Purkinje fibres (manifesting oscillatory afterpotentials and triggered automaticity induced by barium or strophanthidin) and compared with those of 10 microM mexiletine. 4. Both 0.5 microM propafenone and 10 microM mexiletine consistently blocked triggered activity in sheep Purkinje fibres. The onset of the effect of propafenone was slower than that of mexiletine. 5. Unlike mexiletine, propafenone did not reduce the amplitude of oscillatory afterpotentials. 6. In contrast, propafenone significantly reduced Vmax in barium- and strophanthidin-treated preparations. 7. It is concluded that the antiarrhythmic action of propafenone on digitalis- and reoxygenation-induced arrhythmias is probably due to an electrophysiological mechanism different from that of mexiletine. Mexiletine, by reducing the amplitude of oscillatory afterpotentials, prevents the attainment of the threshold; propafenone, by reducing the excitability of the cell, increases the threshold and consequently an oscillatory afterpotential of the same amplitude will not generate arrhythmias.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Electrophysiological effects of diprafenone, a dimethyl congener of propafenone on guinea-pig ventricular cells.

1. The effects of diprafenone and propafenone on transmembrane action potential were examined and compared in papillary muscles and single ventricular myocytes isolated from guinea-pig hearts. 2. In papillary muscles, both diprafenone and propafenone > or = 10(-6) M caused a significant and dose-dependent decrease in the maximum upstroke velocity (Vmax) of the action potential. 3. In the presence of either drug, trains of stimuli at rates > or = 0.1 Hz led to an exponential decline in Vmax. A time constant (tau R) for Vmax recovery from the use-dependent block was 15.5 s for diprafenone and 8.8 s for propafenone. 4. The use-dependent block of Vmax with diprafenone was enhanced when the resting potential was depolarized by high (8, 10 mM) [K+]o, whereas that with propafenone was virtually unchanged. tau R with diprafenone was shortened by the depolarization, while that with propafenone was rather prolonged. 5. In single myocytes perfused with diprafenone or propafenone, 10 ms conditioning clamp to 0 mV caused a significant decrease in Vmax of subsequent action potential. A prolongation of the clamp pulse duration resulted in a modest enhancement of the Vmax inhibition with diprafenone, while a large enhancement of the Vmax inhibition occurred with propafenone. 6. These findings suggest that diprafenone, like propafenone, may block the sodium channel during both the activated and inactivated states. The relative contribution of inactivation block is less important for diprafenone than for propafenone. The different voltage-dependence of use-dependent block with diprafenone from propafenone would contribute to its high antiarrhythmic potency.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1993

Effects of propafenone on calcium currents in single ventricular myocytes of guinea-pig.

1. The effects of propafenone on the inward calcium current (ICa) were investigated in isolated single ventricular myocytes of the guinea-pig by the whole-cell clamp method. Propafenone inhibited ICa in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations of propafenone ranging from 1 x 10(-8) to 1 x 10(-3) M and half maximal block of ICa occurred at a propafenone concentration of 1.5 x 10(-6) M. Propafenone did not change the current-voltage relation of ICa other than a reduction in amplitude and showed no clear use- or frequency-dependent effects upon ICa (stimulation frequencies from 0.03 to 2 Hz). Propafenone did not alter the steady-state inactivation process: the half maximal activation potentials were 18.5 +/- 2.2 mV in the control state and 20.9 +/- 5.0 mV in the presence of 1 x 10(-6) M propafenone (n = 12, NS). Propafenone (1 x 10(-6) M) increased the half-time of reactivation by 73.9% (n = 6, 212.3 +/- 1.2 ms vs 369.2 +/- 1.5 ms, P < 0.05). 2. We conclude that propafenone blocks ICa in a concentration-dependent and a channel state-, use- or frequency-independent manner. The ICa blockade elicited by propafenone at clinically therapeutic plasma concentration is significant and may be involved in its anti-arrhythmic effects.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Steroid-eluting electrodes prevent chronic pacing threshold rise in the atrial chamber after oral propafenone administration.

The aim of the study was to evaluate chronic atrial pacing threshold increase after oral propafenone therapy. Fifty patients affected by advanced AV block and sick sinus syndrome were studied at least 6 months after pacemaker implantation, before and after oral propafenone therapy (450-900 mg/day based on body weight). The patients were subdivided into three groups as to the type of electrode implanted, all three unipolar: group I (20 patients) Medtronic CapSure 4003, group II (13 patients) Medtronic Target Tip 4011, group III (17 patients) Medtronic 4057 screw-in leads. In all cases, Medtronic unipolar pacemakers were implanted with the same noninvasive autothreshold measurement method. Propafenone and 5-OH-propafenone blood levels were measured 3-5 hours after drug administration. The packing autothreshold was measured at 0.8, 1.6, and 2.5 V by reducing the pulse width. After propafenone, groups II and III showed a statistically significant threshold rise (P ranging from < 0.01 to 0.05), whereas no significant difference was found in group I. Propafenone and 5-OH-propafenone blood vessels did not show any significant difference among the three groups. Strength-duration curves were drawn for the three groups before and after propafenone: at baseline the curves shifted to the left with the steep part above the knee, clearly favoring CapSure over the other two groups. After propafenone, the curves shifted to the right, with the flat par progressively more evident in groups II and III. In the atrial chamber, steroid-eluting leads prevented threshold increase after propafenone therapy, in contrast with a significant threshold rise with conventional porous and screw-in leads.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: experience with propafenone.

The authors studied the efficacy of intravenous (IV) (1.5-2 mg/kg) and oral propafenone (450 to 900 mg/day) in 16 patients with paroxysmal, sustained, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). In 5 patients IV propafenone was not given, because of intolerant SVT. Nine patients had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. IV propafenone immediately stopped and prevented reinduction of SVT in 9/11 patients. Oral propafenone prevented SVT induction in 3 of 5 patients. In the 9 patients responsive to IV propafenone, oral propafenone was effective: in particular, in 6 patients SVT tachycardia was not induced by serial transesophageal pacings, and in the remaining 3 patients the arrhythmia was still induced but was slower and of brief duration (3-5 seconds). In 11/12 patients responsive to oral propafenone the minimum effective dosage in preventing the induction of the arrhythmia was 600 mg/day. In only 1 patient was the dose of 450 mg/day equally effective. Propafenone administration was not associated with major side effects. In conclusion, propafenone is very effective in the control of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; intravenous propafenone can predict the efficacy of oral therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Propafenone-induced liver injury.

OBJECTIVE: To describe propafenone-induced liver injury. DESIGN: Retrospective case report. SETTING: Referred care in a large tertiary care center. Laboratory tests were performed at the auxiliary site and the tertiary care center. PATIENT: A 71-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation developed elevations of greater than two times the upper limit of normal in alkaline phosphatase (ALK), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) after initiation of propafenone therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Studies included serial measurements of ALK, ALT, AST, and GGT. RESULTS: The patient developed elevations of greater than two times the upper limit of normal in ALK, ALT, and AST, one month after initiating propafenone therapy. The propafenone dose was decreased from 900 to 675 mg/d and, ten days later, the ALK, ALT, and AST were decreased slightly, but still above the upper limit of normal. One month later, serum transaminases had returned to baseline, but propafenone therapy was discontinued because of recurrent atrial fibrillation, persistent elevation in ALK, and elevation in GGT. Two months after discontinuing propafenone, serum aminotransaminase and ALK concentrations had normalized and GGT had decreased and remained only slightly elevated. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of liver injury secondary to propafenone therapy is rare. Reported cases appear to be secondary to hepatocellular injury, cholestasis, or a combination of the two. In this case, the pattern demonstrated by elevations in liver enzymes may be classified as acute cholestatic liver injury. Because the reported incidence is 0.1-0.2 percent and there are no known fatalities secondary to propafenone liver injury, routine monitoring of liver function tests in all patients receiving propafenone cannot be recommended at this time. Baseline liver function tests prior to initiating propafenone therapy with follow-up laboratory studies one month later are recommended in patients with known liver dysfunction. If elevations are noted, a reduction in dose may result in lower liver enzyme concentrations, although discontinuation of therapy may be required in some cases.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A controlled comparison between oral loading dose and intravenous administration.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare placebo vs two different regimens of propafenone administration--intravenous administration or short-term oral loading--in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. DESIGN: Single-blind placebo-controlled study. PATIENTS: Eighty-seven patients with atrial fibrillation of recent onset (< or = 7 days' duration) admitted to the hospital without signs of organic heart disease (n = 42) or with systemic hypertension without signs or symptoms of heart failure (n = 45). The patients were assigned randomly to treatment with intravenous propafenone (29 patients), oral propafenone (29 patients), or placebo (29 patients). INTERVENTIONS: Administration of propafenone intravenously (2-mg/kg bolus followed by 0.0078 mg/kg/min) or as short-term oral loading (600 mg orally single dose). Patients were submitted to Holter monitoring and conversion to sinus rhythm was evaluated at 1, 3, and 8 h. RESULTS: Conversion to sinus rhythm was obtained within 1 h in 28% with intravenous propafenone, in 3% with oral propafenone, and in 3% with placebo. At 3 h, the efficacy of intravenous propafenone (41%) and of oral propafenone (55%) were statistically superior to placebo (10% of conversions) and at 8 h either intravenous or oral propafenone were effective in almost two thirds of the patients with a statistical difference vs placebo, whose efficacy was 24%. No major side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Propafenone as an oral loading dose is an efficacious and fast way of treating atrial fibrillation of recent onset and due to its simplicity of administration and safety can be preferred to the intravenous route.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

[Immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter lasting less than 90 days by ibutilide versus propafenone: a multicenter study].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ibutilide versus propafenone in immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) lasted less than 90 days. METHODS: 212 consecutive patients suffering from AF or AFL all lasting less than 90 days that were diagnosed and treated in 5 medical centers were randomly assigned into two groups: ibutilide group (n = 107, including 75 AF cases and 32 AFL cases, receiving intravenous injection of ibutilide 1mg over 10 minutes) and propafenone group as control group (n = 105, including 76 AF cases and 29 AFL cases, receiving intravenous injection of propafenone 70 mg over 10 minutes). If AF/AFL still persisted 10 minutes after treatment, the above dose was repeated. The conversion rate within 1.5 hours and adverse effects within 4 hours were observed. RESULTS: (1) The conversion rate on AFL of the ibutilide group was 78.1%, significantly higher than that of the propafenone group (48.3%, P < 0.01), while no significant difference was observed in the conversion rate on AF (54.7% vs. 39.5%, P > 0.05) and the mean conversion time (P > 0.05). However the overall conversion rate on AFL and AF of the ibutilide group was 61.7%, significantly higher than that of the propafenone group (41.9%, P < 0.05). (2) The conversion rate on AF/AFL lasting less than 48 h was 65.9% in the ibutilide group, not significantly different from that of the propafenone group (55.7%), the conversion rate on AF/AFL lasting 3 approximately 30 d in the ibutilide group was 66.7%, significantly higher than that of the propafenone group (26.3%, P < 0.05), and the conversion rate on AF/AFL lasting 31 - 88 d was 50%, significantly higher than that of the propafenone group (0, P < 0.01). (3) There was no difference in the times needed for conversion between these 2 groups. (4) The most severe adverse effect in the ibutilide group was short run of ventricular tachycardia occurring in 5 cases among which 4 cases recovered simultaneously and one case recovered after accepting a bolus dose of 100 mg lidocaine. The most severe adverse effects in propafenone group were RR interval longer than 1.5 s (4 cases) and transient hypotension. An acute coronary event was also seen in propafenone group, however, unrelated to the experimental drug. CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of ibutilide in cardioversion of AF and AFL is safe and effective.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Comparison of propafenone and disopyramide in the treatment of ventricular premature complexes: a randomized double blind crossover placebo controlled trial.

To determine the efficacy of the newer antiarrhythmic drug propafenone and to compare it to disopyramide, sixteen patients--11 men and 5 women--participated in a randomized double-blind crossover placebo-controlled trial using 150 mg quid of propafenone or disopyramide. Twenty-four hour ECG's were performed at the end of the placebo period and each 2 weeks of drug therapy. Droupouts (2) because of adverse effects were not included in analysis. On placebo there were 485 +/- 535 (mean +/- SD) ventricular premature complexes (VPC's)/hour. Propafenone significantly (p = 0.010) reduced VPC's to a slightly smaller amount 182 +/- 298/hour. There was no significant difference between propafenone and disopyramide in suppressing VPC's, however, analysis of the circadian rhythm of VPC's showed a greater reduction in VPC's from 1600 to 2400 hour after propafenone compared to disopyramide using this dose regimen. Using a criterion of efficacy of greater than 80% reduction in VPC's, 8/14 patients had a good suppression with propafenone, 3 patients responded only to propafenone, 4 patients only to disopyramide, 5 patients to both and 2 patients to neither. Using a criterion of efficacy of greater than 65% reduction in VPC's 11/14 patients had good suppression with propafenone or disopyramide, 3 patients responded only to propafenone and 4 patients only to disopyramide. Side effects were more common with disopyramide. Two patients dropped out after disopyramide because of gastrointestinal symptoms. Side effects were found in 11/14 remaining patients on disopyramide, but in 6/14 on propafenone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1984

[Anti-arrhythmic effect of oral propafenone. Apropos of 70 cases].

During a 3 year period, seventy patients aged 53 +/- 16 years with a total of 73 arrhythmias were treated over a mean period of 6.8 months (maximum 27 months) with oral propafenone, the usual dose being 900 mg/day. The study covered the whole spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias (32 supraventricular, 41 ventricular), and their relation to the autonomic nervous system. The efficacy was scored from 1 (no effect) to 5 (complete control) as judged by the clinical response, the results of Holter monitoring (175 control and 133 test recordings on therapy), and a comparison was made between the effects of propafenone and other antiarrhythmics: quinidine-like drugs, beta-blockers and amiodarone. With respect to supraventricular arrhythmias: 9 cases of vagally-induced atrial flutter and fibrillation were unaffected by propafenone (mean score = 1.1). On the other hand, the drug was very effective (mean score = 4.1) in 8 cases of adrenergic atrial arrhythmias. In 12 arrhythmias with more varied mechanisms (extrasystoles, tachysystole, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) an intermediate score was obtained (2.8). Three cases of resistant junctional tachycardia due to reentry were improved. At ventricular level, 5 cases of extrasystole sensitive to quinidine were also improved by propafenone (4.6); the difference was more clearcut in 8 cases of benign idiopathic tachycardia (propafenone: 4.1, and quinidine: 2.4). This was more marked in 13 cases of more severe arrhythmia in diseased hearts in which the effect of propafenone (4.1) was superior even to that of amiodarone. However, propafenone was less effective (3.3) than amiodarone in 4 cases of severe polymorphic idiopathic ventricular tachycardia closely related to the autonomic nervous system. The antiarrhythmic effect of propafenone was appreciable in 10 cases of resistant post-infarction ventricular tachycardia, eventually in association with amiodarone. Slowing of the sinus rhythm (-11.6%) with no change in the day/night ratio was due to beta-inhibition. However, in toxic doses this may progress to sinoatrial block (9 cases). A lengthening of the PR interval and duration of QRS was common, but this was not complicated by torsade de pointes, one case of which was successfully treated by propafenone. Secondary gastro-intestinal effects and vertigo were rarely severe enough to warrant stopping therapy. In conclusion, these results show that the introduction of propafenone is a valuable therapeutic advance in the treatment of arrhythmias, especially in those with a favoring adrenergic mechanism.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Oral propafenone for rapid conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation--a review.

OBJECTIVE: To review comparative studies evaluating oral propafenone for restoring sinus rhythm in recent onset atrial fibrillation. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature (1966 to 1996) along with any referenced articles not identified by MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION: Because intravenous propafenone is not marketed in Canada, only studies evaluating oral propafenone were included. Studies were selected if they compared oral propafenone with placebo or other antiarrhythmic agents for converting recent onset atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm. DATA SYNTHESIS: Propafenone is often used as a first-line agent for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. In earlier studies, the efficacy of propafenone in restoring sinus rhythm was reported to be low with conversion rates of 6% to 62%. Many of these studies were noncomparative and often included patients with refractory, chronic atrial fibrillation or employed suboptimal doses of propafenone. More recently propafenone has been evaluated in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation by using a single 600 mg oral loading dose. Success rates of 76% at 8 h and 83% at 12 h following the loading dose are reported. The incidence of atrial flutter during active treatment was similar to that with placebo, with the majority exhibiting 2:1 or greater atrioventricular conduction ratios and heart rates 150 beats/min or less. CONCLUSIONS: A single 600 mg oral dose of propafenone is highly effective at restoring sinus rhythm in patients with acute onset atrial fibrillation with few adverse effects. The small studies reviewed cannot lead to definitive conclusions about the safety of propafenone without prior administration of agents for rate control.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1987

Propafenone versus disopyramide: a double-blind randomized crossover trial in patients presenting chronic ventricular arrhythmias.

In vitro and in vivo electrophysiological studies have shown that propafenone could be classified as a class I antiarrhythmic agent. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of propafenone in 10 patients compared to disopyramide in a double-blind randomized protocol. Included patients suffered from ventricular arrhythmias with at least 60 ventricular premature beats (VPB) per hour refractory to at least two other antiarrhythmic agents. At the end of the control period and of the two treatment periods during which patients received either propafenone (300 mg three times a day) or disopyramide (200 mg three times a day), clinical examination, Holter recordings, electrocardiogram, and clinical laboratory tests were performed. The PR interval and the QRS interval were significantly increased with propafenone, but not with disopyramide. The cQT interval was not significantly changed by either propafenone or disopyramide. Heart rate was decreased with propafenone (p less than 0.05) with no change in the diurnal/nocturnal circadian ratio variation. Heart rate was significantly decreased with disopyramide only during the day. Five of nine patients in the propafenone group and two of nine patients in the disopyramide group showed a reduction in ventricular premature beats greater than 80%. Total resolution of severe arrhythmias (repetitive events) was seen in 5 of 8 patients with propafenone; 2 of 8 with disopyramide. Adverse events, when they occurred, were mild (visual disturbances, epigastric discomfort, changes in taste perception, transient atrioventricular block with propafenone, and photophobia with disopyramide), and did not require reduction or discontinuation of study drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Intravenous and oral propafenone for treatment of tachycardia in infants and children: pharmacokinetics and clinical response.

To elucidate contribution of an active metabolite to overall clinical responses to propafenone, steady-state disposition of propafenone and its active metabolite and the clinical responses to treatment were examined in pediatric patients receiving intravenous or oral propafenone. There were more than ten-fold interindividual differences in apparent clearance, resulting in a wide range of the steady-state trough plasma concentrations of propafenone. The active metabolite, 5-hydroxypropafenone, was detected in four of the six patients receiving oral propafenone; however, two neonates receiving oral propafenone and all eight receiving intravenous propafenone had no detectable levels of 5-hydroxypropafenone in plasma. In nine patients for whom electrocardiographic (ECG) data were available, the PQ interval was significantly increased, whereas the QRS duration and the QTc interval were not. There was no close relationship between plasma concentrations of propafenone or 5-hydroxypropafenone and ECG parameters. Lack of good correlation between serum concentrations and clinical response precludes using a serum-concentration targeting strategy with propafenone therapy.

Administration, Oral↗