Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pirinitramide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Influence of bolus size on efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with piritramide.

We have examined the influence of bolus size on efficacy, opioid consumption, side effects and patient satisfaction during i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in 60 patients (ASA I-II, aged 32-82 yr) after abdominal surgery. Patients were allocated randomly, in a double-blind manner, to receive PCA with a bolus dose of either piritramide 0.75 mg or 1.5 mg (lockout 5 min) for postoperative pain control. Mean 24 h piritramide consumption differed significantly between groups (11.4 (SD 5.8) mg vs 22.5 (18.3) mg; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of applied bolus doses, pain scores, pain relief (VAS), sedation, nausea, pruritus and patient satisfaction. We conclude that a PCA regimen with a bolus dose of piritramide 0.75 mg and a lockout time of 5 min was effective in the treatment of postoperative pain, but did not reduce the occurrence of side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Patients' vs nurses' assessments of postoperative pain and anxiety during patient- or nurse-controlled analgesia.

We have compared patients' and nurses' assessments of postoperative pain and anxiety after different analgesic treatments. Sixty orthopaedic patients were allocated randomly to receive i.v. piritramide (either nurse-controlled or patient-controlled) or subarachnoid bupivacaine (nurse-controlled or patient-controlled). Patients and nurses assessed pain and anxiety using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 1-100 mm). Pain and anxiety ratings of patients and nurses were significantly correlated (Spearman's r > or = 0.69; P < 0.001). In general, patients' pain scores were higher than nurses' scores (patients' median VAS = 34 (range 1-76) mm; nurses VAS 21 (1-59) mm) and for all groups except the patient-controlled subarachnoid bupivacaine group, where they were significantly higher (P < 0.01). Discrepancy in pain estimates between patients and nurses increased with the level of pain. The relationship between patients' and nurses' anxiety scores was less clearly defined and did not depend on the level of anxiety.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Emetic effects of morphine and piritramide.

BACKGROUND: Successful management of postoperative pain requires that adequate analgesia is achieved without excessive adverse effects. Opioid-induced nausea and vomiting is known to impair patients' satisfaction, but there are no studies providing sufficient power to test the hypothesis that the incidence of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting differs between micro -opioid receptor agonists. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that the incidence of vomiting and nausea differs between morphine and piritramide. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind fashion, we administered either morphine (n=250) or piritramide (n=250) by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain relief. We used a bolus dose of 1.5 mg with a lockout time of 10 min. Incidence and intensity (numerical rating scale) of postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain, patient satisfaction (score 0-10), side-effects (score 0-3) and drug consumption were measured. RESULTS: Mean drug consumption did not differ between the piritramide and morphine groups (30.8 (SD 22.4) mg day(-1) vs 28.4 (21.8) mg day(-1)) during the first postoperative day and there were no significant differences in the overall incidence of nausea (30% vs 27%) and vomiting (19% vs 15%). Intensity of nausea correlated inversely (P=0.01) with morphine consumption but not with piritramide consumption. Pain scores both at rest (2.2 (1.9) vs 2.6 (2)) and during movement (4.4 (2.2) vs 4.9 (2.3)) were slightly but significantly less with morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-induced emesis was observed in about one-third of the patients using morphine and piritramide for PCA and the incidence of vomiting was one-half of that. Potential differences in the incidence of vomiting during PCA therapy between these micro-opioid receptor agonists can be excluded.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Increased numbers of opioid expressing inflammatory cells do not affect intra-articular morphine analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Both locally expressed beta-endorphin (END) and low doses of morphine relieve pain within inflamed knee joints. Here we examined whether enhanced inflammation and END expression within the synovial tissue of patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery might shift the analgesic dose-response curve of intra-articular (i.a.) morphine. METHODS: Following IRB approval and informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to the following i.a. treatments at the end of surgery: group I (n=39), isotonic saline; group II (n=40), 1 mg morphine hydrochloride; group III (n=48), 2 mg morphine hydrochloride; group IV (n=39), 4 mg morphine hydrochloride. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS), by the time to first analgesic request and by the supplemental piritramide consumption. Synovial specimens from each patient were stained for the presence of inflammatory cells and END and were discriminated into groups with low versus high numbers of these cells. Differences between groups were statistically analyzed by chi(2), anova and mancova where appropiate. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and VAS scores did not differ between groups. Total postoperative piritramide consumption decreased and the time to first analgesic request increased significantly with increasing doses of i.a. morphine (P<0.05, anova and linear regression). These dose-response relationships were not different between patients with low versus high numbers of inflammatory and END-containing synovial cells (P>0.05, mancova). CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response relationship of i.a. morphine analgesia is not shifted by enhanced inflammation and END expression within synovial tissue. Thus, the presence of END within inflamed synovial tissue does not seem to interfere with i.a. morphine analgesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Postoperative analgesia with no motor block by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil after total hip replacement.

UNLABELLED: We assessed the analgesic efficacy of postoperative epidural ropivacaine 0.1% with and without sufentanil 1 microgram/mL in this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study of 30 ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Lumbar epidural block using 0.75% ropivacaine was combined with either propofol sedation or general anesthesia for surgery. After surgery, the epidural infusion was commenced. Fifteen patients in each group received either an epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 microgram/mL sufentanil (R + S) or 0.1% ropivacaine without sufentanil (R) at a rate of 5-9 mL/h. All patients had access to i.v. piritramide via a patient-controlled analgesia device. The R + S group consumed six times less piritramide over a 48-h infusion period than the R group (median 12.7 vs 73.0 mg; P < 0.001). Motor block was negligible for the study duration in both groups. Patient satisfaction was excellent. The incidence of adverse events, such as nausea, was similar. We conclude that a continuous epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 microgram/mL sufentanil is more effective than ropivacaine alone in treating pain after elective hip replacement without motor block. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first randomized study comparing the efficacy of the epidural combination of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 microgram/mL versus plain ropivacaine 0.1% in treating pain after hip replacement. We found that ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 microgram/mL led to a sixfold reduction in opioid requirements after total hip replacement by producing a negligible motor block.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Pleural bupivacaine for pain treatment after nephrectomy.

UNLABELLED: The efficacy of pleural analgesia after nephrectomy is controversial. We therefore evaluated i.v. opioid requirements in patients with and without pleural bupivacaine. Patients undergoing elective nephrectomy were randomly assigned to receive postoperative i.v. piritramid alone (n = 18) or piritramid combined with pleural bupivacaine (n = 19). In the patients assigned to receive pleural analgesia, boluses of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine were given at 6-h intervals via an pleural catheter that was inserted in the medial axillary line at the sixth intercostal space. Pain scores (10-cm visual analog scale) and opioid requirements were recorded over the first 2 postoperative days. One hour after pleural puncture, a chest radiograph was performed. The catheter was removed 48 h after insertion. Patient characteristics were similar in each group, as was the duration of surgery. Pain scores were similar in each group: 3.0 +/- 2.5 in those given pleural bupivacaine and 3.1 +/- 2.7 in those given piritramid alone. However, the piritramid requirement was significantly less in those given pleural bupivacaine (23 +/- 3 mg) than in those given piritramid alone (45 +/- 6 mg). Furthermore, the time from completion of surgery until the first opioid request was significantly longer in the patients who received bupivacaine (4.7 +/- 1.0 vs 2.8 +/- 1.0 h). One patient had a small pneumothorax that resolved without treatment. These data indicate that pleural analgesia is effective and provides a significant opioid-sparing effect. IMPLICATIONS: We conclude that pleural analgesia significantly prolongs the time until postoperative opioid was first requested and halves the total required dose. These data indicate that pleural analgesia is effective and provides a significant opioid-sparing effect.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2000

Interpleural analgesia does not influence postthoracotomy pain.

UNLABELLED: The management of postthoracotomy pain is a problem and may contribute to atelectasis, leading to hypoxemia, pulmonary infection, and permanent alveolar damage. We sought to determine the efficacy of interpleural analgesia for pain control and to evaluate independent predictors for postoperative pain intensity. Eighty-three patients undergoing elective anterolateral (n = 37) and posterolateral (n = 46) thoracotomy were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Patients were assigned to receive either 0.5% bupivacaine or saline solution interpleurally every 4 h for 10 doses postoperatively. All patients also received patient-controlled analgesics (PCA) with piritramide as the opioid for additional pain control. Pain was assessed on the basis of PCA requirements and by using a visual analog scale. Visual analog scale scores and PCA requirements were not different between groups. Both interpleural bupivacaine and saline significantly reduced pain scores 30 min after the administration. We concluded that pain reduction by interpleural instillation of bupivacaine reflects a placebo-like effect; however, interpleural analgesia is not effective in patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy. Sex and surgical approach were shown to influence postoperative pain intensity at rest, but not during coughing. The female patients, and those undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy, exhibited higher pain scores. This observation appears to be of only marginal clinical significance. The efficacy of interpleural analgesia to reduce postoperative pain intensity in patients after lateral thoracotomy is controversial. In this study we demonstrated a lack of efficacy of interpleural analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: The efficacy of interpleural analgesia to reduce postoperative pain intensity in patients after lateral thoracotomy is controversial. In this study, we demonstrated a lack of efficacy of interpleural analgesia.

Analgesia↗
PubMed2001

Prophylactically-administered rectal acetaminophen does not reduce postoperative opioid requirements in infants and small children undergoing elective cleft palate repair.

UNLABELLED: Rectal acetaminophen (Ac) is often administered prophylactically at anesthesia induction for postoperative pain management in small children and is thought to have an opioid-sparing effect. We assessed in this double-blinded, prospective, randomized study early opioid requirements after three doses of Ac (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg versus placebo) in 80 children (ASA physical status I, age 11.4 +/- 9.9 mo) undergoing cleft palate repair. Single Ac plasma concentrations were measured. Pain scores assessed in the postanesthesia care unit of > or = 4 of 10 resulted in the IV administration of 25 microg/kg piritramide, a popular European mu receptor agonist (lockout time, 10 min; maximum 0.125 mg/kg). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to the early postoperative pain scores and the overall cumulative IV opioid requirements. Maximal plasma concentrations achieved were only subtherapeutic (Ac 10 mg/kg: 8 microg/mL; Ac 20 mg/kg: 13 microg/mL; Ac 40 mg/kg: 21 microg/mL after 122, 122, and 121 min, respectively). We conclude that rectal Ac up to 40 mg/kg has no opioid-sparing effect, does not result in analgesic Ac plasma concentrations, and lacks proof of its efficacy in infants and small children undergoing cleft palate repair, whereas titrated IV opioid boluses produced rapid and reliable pain relief. IMPLICATIONS: Acetaminophen is widely used prophylactically for postoperative analgesia in children and is thought to have an opioid-sparing effect. We showed that rectal acetaminophen up to 40 mg/kg administered at anesthesia induction lacked proof of efficacy, whereas IV opioid boluses resulted in reliable pain relief in children undergoing cleft palate repair.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2001

Amantadine, a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, does not enhance postoperative analgesia in women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

UNLABELLED: N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists administered before surgery will improve postoperative analgesia, presumably by inhibiting spinal sensitization processes. However, current clinical formulations of NMDA antagonists either enable only an oral application (i.e., dextromethorphan) or are associated with psychotropic side effects, as with the IV delivery of ketamine. Because of its noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist characteristics, amantadine may improve postoperative analgesia when administered before surgically induced trauma. In this prospective, randomized clinical study, we examined whether female patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy experienced less postoperative pain when IV amantadine was applied in comparison with placebo before the start of surgery. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive 500 mL saline IV before the induction of standardized general anesthesia in Group 1 (Control group) or, in a double-blinded manner, 200 mg amantadine IV in 500 mL saline in Group 2 (Treatment group). Postoperative pain control was provided via IV patient-controlled analgesia with piritramide. During the first 48 h after tracheal extubation, pain perception was assessed by visual analog scales, and all analgesic requirements were documented. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to pain scores, postoperative analgesic requirements, and the incidence of side effects. Because of no differences in postoperative pain or opioid consumption, we conclude that a preoperative dose of 200 mg amantadine IV fails to enhance postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy. IMPLICATIONS: Because of no differences in postoperative pain or opioid consumption, we conclude that a preoperative dose of 200 mg amantadine IV fails to enhance postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Splanchnic oxygen consumption and hepatic surface oxygen tensions during isoflurane anesthesia.

Blood flow to and oxygen consumption of the splanchnic organs were determined together with hepatic surface oxygen tensions in 18 mongrel dogs anesthetized with the long-acting narcotic piritramid. Twelve animals also received 0.7 Vol% and 1.4 Vol% isoflurane; six time-related controls received piritramid only. Surgical preparation consisted of a left thoracotomy for inserting a catheter into the left atrium for microsphere injections and for gaining access to the hepatic surface through an incision in the diaphragm. Parameters in the animals receiving isoflurane were recorded at three stages: stage 1--piritramid anesthesia after surgical preparation; stage 2-60 min after addition of 0.7 Vol% (end-expiratory) isoflurane; stage 3-60 min after addition of 1.4 Vol% (end-expiratory) isoflurane. Hepatic surface oxygen tension was determined at each stage using an eight-channel oxygen sensitive electrode. Mean arterial pressure and cardiac output decreased during both stages with isoflurane; hepatic arterial inflow remained constant. Portal blood flow and, hence, total hepatic inflow decreased significantly. An unchanged splanchnic O2 consumption induced lower hepatic venous pO2 values: 40 +/- 1 mmHg at control, 35 +/- 2 mmHg, and 31 +/- 2 mmHg (mean +/- SEM; both P less than 0.05) during isoflurane. A concomitant decrease of hepatic surface pO2 values indicated an altered tissue oxygenation. The percentage of hepatic surface pO2 values in the lowest pO2 range (0-5 mmHg) increased significantly from 8.4 to 20.3% during 1.4 Vol% isoflurane; the percentage of values of 0 mmHg increased from 2.4 to 9.8% during 1.4 Vol.%. No changes of these parameters were detected in the control animals during the 3-h observation period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Population pharmacokinetics of piritramide in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Piritramide is a synthetic opioid used for postoperative analgesia in several European countries. The authors present a mixed-effects model of its population pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: After institutional approval and informed patient consent was obtained, 29 patients who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and aged 21-82 yr were enrolled in the study. They received 0.2 mg/kg piritramide as an intravenous bolus before anesthesia was induced. Central venous blood samples were drawn for as long as 48 h after administration of the drug. The plasma concentration of piritramide was determined by gas chromatography. The concentration-time data were analyzed by mixed-effects modeling. Target-controlled infusions and intermittent bolus regimens were simulated to identify a regimen suitable for patient-controlled analgesia based on population pharmacokinetics and published pharmacodynamic data. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of piritramide were described adequately by a linear three-compartment model. Patient age and weight were significant covariates. The values of the pharmacokinetic parameters are: V1 = 50.5 [1], V2 = 150 x (1 + 9.32 x 10(-3) x (age - 47 yr)) [l], V3 = 212 x (1 + 6.37 x 10(-3) x (age - 47 yr)) [l], Cl1 = 0.56 x (1 - 6.14 x 10(-3) x (age - 47 yr)) [l/min], Cl2 = 8.25 x (1 + 2.02 x 10(-2) x (Wt - 74 kg)) [l/min], Cl3 = 0.80 [l/min]. The age of 47 yr and the weight of 74 kg refer to the median values for these factors in the patients studied. Rapid distribution, slow distribution, and elimination half-lives for the median patient are 0.05, 1.34, and 10.43 h, respectively. The context-sensitive half-time after a 24-h infusion is predicted at 10.5 h in a 75-yr-old patient compared with 7 h for the median patient. CONCLUSIONS: Piritramide is distributed extensively and eliminated slowly. The pharmacokinetic profile of the drug allows for intermittent bolus administration even when constant effect compartment concentrations are desirable, e.g., for PLA.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Quality of postoperative pain using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter after major lumbar spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major spinal surgery is associated with high postoperative pain scores and opioid requirement. The aim of the current prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was to assess the reduction of opioid requirement and pain scores using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter with infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine during the postoperative period. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing major lumbar spinal surgery from a dorsal approach were included in this study. Before wound closure, the orthopedic surgeon inserted an epidural catheter. Postoperatively, patients were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of 12 ml/h ropivacaine, 0.1% (group R), or 12 ml/h saline (group N) after an initial bolus of 10 ml of the respective study solution. Additional pain relief was provided using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia pump with the opioid piritramide. Patients were assessed with respect to pain scores (visual analog scale of 0-100), cumulative opioid requirement, side effects, and satisfaction with pain management. RESULTS: : Demographic data, duration of surgery, and type of surgery were comparable between groups. Pain scores were assessed as follows (group R vs. group N: 6 h: 24 +/-20 vs. 51 +/- 20, P = 0.002; 24 h: 33 +/- 19 vs. 53 +/- 27, P = 0.04; 48 h: 21 +/-17 vs. 40 +/- 26, P = 0.04; 72 h: 14 +/- 13 vs. 38 +/- 25, P = 0.02). The cumulative piritramide requirement after 72 h was 97 +/- 23 mg in group R and 157 +/-72 mg in group N (P = 0.03). The incidence of side effects was comparable between groups, and patient satisfaction was always higher in group R (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine results in lower pain scores and opioid consumption and higher patient satisfaction when compared with placebo. Application of ropivacaine using an epidural catheter seems to be a highly effective treatment for postoperative pain after major lumbar spinal surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine decreases postoperative pain and speeds the return of bowel function. The authors therefore tested the hypothesis that perioperative lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: Forty patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated to receive intravenous lidocaine (bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine at induction of anesthesia, then a continuous infusion of 2 mg.kg.h intraoperatively and 1.33 mg.kg.h for 24 h postoperatively) or an equal volume of saline. All patients received similar intensive postoperative rehabilitation. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and fatigue scores were measured. Times to first flatus, defecation, and hospital discharge were recorded. Postoperative endocrine (cortisol and catecholamines) and metabolic (leukocytes, C-reactive protein, and glucose) responses were measured for 48 h. Data (presented as median [25-75% interquartile range], lidocaine vs. saline groups) were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar in the two groups. Times to first flatus (17 [11-24] vs. 28 [25-33] h; P<0.001), defecation (28 [24-37] vs. 51 [41-70] h; P=0.001), and hospital discharge (2 [2-3] vs. 3 [3-4] days; P=0.001) were significantly shorter in patients who received lidocaine. Lidocaine significantly reduced opioid consumption (8 [5-18] vs. 22 [14-36] mg; P=0.005) and postoperative pain and fatigue scores. In contrast, endocrine and metabolic responses were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous lidocaine improves postoperative analgesia, fatigue, and bowel function after laparoscopic colectomy. These benefits are associated with a significant reduction in hospital stay.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Pulmonary venodilation by isoflurane improves gas exchange during Escherichia coli bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how isoflurance affects the longitudinal distribution of pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary gas exchange during Escherichia coli bacteremia. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study with open-label assignment of animals to two groups. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Goehingen minipigs. INTERVENTIONS: Induction of acute respiratory failure by a 4-hr infusion of live E. coli bacteria in 12 animals; six animals anesthetized with methohexital/piritramide; six animals anesthetized with isoflurane. The control group consisted of four animals that received the same surgical procedure, but no E. coli infusion. Two animals were anesthetized with methohexital/piritramide and two with isoflurane, respectively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac output and pressures were measured by means of an arterial catheter, Swan-Ganz catheter, and a left atrial catheter. Effective pulmonary capillary pressure was evaluated graphically from a pulmonary artery occlusion pressure decay. Arterial-alveolar PO2 ratio was calculated to evaluate pulmonary function. Measurements were performed before and after 1, 2, and 3.5 hrs of E. coli infusion. Statistical significance was tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA). E. coli infusion caused hypodynamic shock, an increase in pre- and postcapillary pulmonary vascular resistance and respiratory failure. Postcapillary pressure gradient and effective pulmonary capillary pressure were lower in the isoflurane-group. Methohexital-anesthetized animals developed pulmonary dysfunction after 1 hr of bacteremia, whereas isoflurane-anesthetized animals developed pulmonary dysfunction after 3.5 hrs of E. coli infusion (significantly different, ANOVA, p < .05). There were no significant changes in the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane is a pulmonary venodilator. During lethal E. coli infusion, it ameliorates the increase in pulmonary capillary pressure and preserves pulmonary function until vascular permeability increases.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

Effect of patient-controlled analgesia on pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) alone or in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery, when compared with conventional nurse-controlled analgesia. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University Medical Center. PATIENTS: A total of 120 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. INTERVENTIONS: After extubation of the trachea, 120 patients were randomly allocated to three different methods of postoperative pain relief for 72 hrs. In group 1, patients received PCA with a bolus of 1.5 mg piritramide combined with a 10-min lockout interval. Group 2 patients were treated with a combination of PCA and administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed three times per day. Patients of group 3 received conventional nurse-controlled analgesia. Postoperative assessment included daily visual analog pain scoring (VAS) and chest radiographs. All chest radiographs were graded for the extent of atelectasis by a radiologist blinded as to treatment using a scale from 0 to 9 for each of the three lung fields of the right and left lungs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Chest radiograph atelectasis scores and VAS values were similar among the three groups on the first and second days. On the third day, the chest radiograph atelectasis scores of the left lower and the right middle lung field were significantly better in the groups treated with PCA alone (4.7 +/- 3.0; 0.3 +/- 1.0) and in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (3.9 +/- 1.1; 0.4 +/- 1.2) than in the control group (5.5 +/- 3.1; 0.8 +/- 1.8). Furthermore, on the third day, the VAS values for maximum pain were higher in the control group (42.6 +/- 19.7) compared with the VAS values in the two groups with PCA (32.2 +/- 17.9 and 34.5 +/- 21.0). CONCLUSIONS: PCA significantly decreases postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting when compared with nurse-controlled analgesia. In addition, patients treated with PCA experienced a higher quality of analgesia. We therefore conclude that treatment with PCA may reduce respiratory complications after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2002

Epidural administration of low-dose morphine combined with clonidine for postoperative analgesia after lumbar disc surgery.

This study evaluates the efficacy and side effects of a low dose of epidural morphine combined with clonidine for postoperative pain relief after lumbar disc surgery. In 36 of 51 patients who accepted the procedure, an epidural catheter was inserted (L1-L2 level). General anesthesia was induced with propofol and sufentanil, and maintained with sevoflurane in O2/N2O. After emergence from anesthesia, epidural analgesia was initiated according to two randomly assigned protocols: 1 mg of morphine with 75 microg of clonidine (Group M) or 12.5 mg of bupivacaine with 75 microg of clonidine (Group B), in 10 mL saline. Piritramide was administered during the first postoperative 24 hours using a patient-controlled analgesia device (PCA). The following parameters were recorded: piritramide consumption during the first 24 hours; pain at rest during the first postoperative hours (D0), during the first night (D1), and during the first mobilization; [visual analogue scale (VAS)]; and the occurrence of drowsiness, motor blockade, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, itching, micturition problems, and bladder catheterization during D0 and D1. Epidural administration of morphine-clonidine significantly improved postoperative pain relief and reduced piritramide consumption as compared to epidural bupivacaine-clonidine. Side effects did not differ between groups except for a higher incidence of micturition problems in Group M during D1. The occurrence of bladder catheterization was not significantly higher in that group. We conclude that a low dose of epidural morphine combined with clonidine offers a better postoperative analgesia than does bupivacaine-clonidine. The excellent analgesic conditions were obtained at the expense of a higher incidence of difficulties in initiating micturition.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2000

A prospective, open, single blind, randomized study comparing four analgesics in the treatment of peripheral injury in the emergency department.

The efficacy of four analgesics, distinct concerning analgesic power and mechanism of action, was evaluated for pain relief in patients suffering from single peripheral injury. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either propacetamol (the pro-drug of paracetamol) 20 mg/kg i.v., piritramide 0.25 mg/kg i.m., tramadol 1 mg/kg i.v. or diclofenac 1 mg/kg i.v. Pain scores were measured by the patient using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and by an observer using a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS). Cardiorespiratory variables and side effects were recorded. One hundred and sixty patients were included, 131 completed the study. Groups matched for demography and baseline pain levels. In general pain scores decreased with time. No significant differences were found between groups at any particular time point. VAS scores were significantly (p < 0.02) lower than baseline scores 30 minutes after injection in all treatment groups except for the piritramide group where significance (p < 0.01) was reached after 60 minutes. VRS score analysis showed a similar trend although significances differed. In the piritramide group significantly more side effects were noted than in the other groups (p < 0.05). We conclude that intravenous propacetamol, tramadol and diclofenac are equally efficacious for emergency analgesic treatment of single peripheral trauma.

Acetaminophen↗