Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PRURITUS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nicergoline in the treatment of pruritus in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Pruritus is a common symptom among patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. The effect of nicergoline, an ergoline, on pruritus was studied in products released during dialysis. In a first experiment series, 20 age-matched normal individuals, 25 patients receiving hemodialysis without pruritus, and 15 patients receiving hemodialysis with pruritus had intradermal tests with 500 micrograms of papaverine. All patients with pruritus had a small papaverine skin test response, and mean values were significantly (p less than 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test) smaller in patients with pruritus. All patients with pruritus entered in a crossover, double-blind trial with nicergoline. In a first period of six dialyses, they received either nicergoline (daily oral dose, 30 mg, and intravenous dose during dialyses, 5 mg) or placebo. In the second period of six dialyses, patients received the crossover treatment. Nicergoline was effective in 13/15 patients, eight of these patients having a complete remission of pruritus. When nicergoline was stopped, patients relapsed within 24 to 48 hours. All patients who improved during the trial were then treated with a daily dose of 30 mg of nicergoline for 6 months. Seven patients had a complete remission, five had moderate symptoms, and one patient relapsed. This study demonstrated that some hemodialyzed patients with pruritus of unknown etiology had improvement with nicergoline.

Adult↗

Pruritus after intrathecal baclofen withdrawal: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of pruritus after intrathecal baclofen (ITB) withdrawal and to study the pathophysiology of this symptom. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Rehabilitation department of a general hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=102) implanted with an ITB pump who had been followed up since 1988. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of pruritus after withdrawal. We studied the relation between pruritus and daily dose, concentration and mode of infusion of baclofen, and cause of the central nervous system lesion inducing spasticity. RESULTS: Pruritus was observed in 10 of 23 cases of ITB withdrawal. It never occurred during the first 3 months after pump implantation. It seems likely that the segmental spinal action of baclofen is responsible for pruritus. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with ITB deprivation who did and did not experience pruritus in their daily infused dosage or in concentration and mode of infusion. Surprisingly, no pruritus was observed in patients with multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pruritus is a frequent symptom after ITB withdrawal. Its occurrence is probably subsequent to chronic blocking of the liberation of substance P by baclofen at the spinal level. This symptom is a good clinical predictor of baclofen withdrawal, in contrast to an isolated increase of spasticity that may be due to drug tolerance or irritant factors. Pruritus requires investigation of a possible dysfunction of the infusion system.

Baclofen↗

Plasma separation and anion adsorption transiently relieve intractable pruritus in primary biliary cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pruritus can be a severely disabling symptom in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis who do not respond to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid, anion exchangers, enzyme inducers, or opiate antagonists. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of plasma separation and anion adsorption in the treatment of intractable pruritus of cholestasis. METHODS: Three patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and intractable pruritus defined by severity of pruritus 7 on a rating scale between 0 (no pruritus) and 10 (maximal pruritus) on at least 4 of 7 days despite medical treatment were treated with plasma separation and anion adsorption on three consecutive days. Fatigue was assessed using the Fisk Fatigue Severity Score and quality of life was assessed by the PBC-40, a disease specific health related quality of life measure. RESULTS: Improvement in pruritus, fatigue, and quality of life was transiently observed in all patients. Serum bile acid levels showed no association with intensity of pruritus, and the bile acid pattern was not altered. The treatment was well tolerated by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma separation and anion adsorption seem to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis suffering from intractable pruritus.

Adsorption↗

Treatment of refractory cholestatic pruritus with molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS).

UNLABELLED: Pruritus is a common complication of cholestatic liver diseases or liver graft dysfunction. Current medical therapies lack efficacy. The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) represents an interesting therapeutic option. Our objective was to report our experience in the management of four patients with intractable pruritus with MARS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The MARS treatment cycle included three consecutive treatments, each of 8 hours duration. The four patients with intractable pruritus who were treated had primary biliary cirrhosis/autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome (n = 1), ductopenic allograft rejection (n = 2), or posttransplant cholestatic HCV recurrence (n = 1). Intensity of pruritus was documented 24 hours before as well as 24 hours, 7 and 30 days after MARS therapy, and at the end of follow-up. We measured complete blood cell counts, glucose, BUN, creatinine, sodium, potassium, AST, ALT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, prothrombin activity, and activated partial thromboplastin time. RESULTS: MARS therapy was well tolerated. Patient 1 experienced temporal relief of pruritus, but needed another MARS cycle because of relapse. Patient 2 experienced partial and temporary relief of pruritus, was listed for retransplantation, and received a liver graft 2 months later. Patient 3 showed a dramatic reduction in the degree of pruritus with MARS. Pruritus in patient 4 decreased promptly with MARS therapy and conversion of immunosuppression to tacrolimus, thereby avoiding retransplantation. CONCLUSION: MARS therapy is a promising, safe therapeutic option to treat refractory pruritus caused by cholestatic liver disorders.

Adult↗

Relief of pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis after treatment with topical doxepin cream. The Doxepin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is associated with severe pruritus for which effective topical treatment is lacking. As a potent H1 and H2 antagonist, the antipruritic effect of topical doxepin was first demonstrated in histamine-induced itch in nonatopic volunteers. OBJECTIVE: The current study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of topical 5% doxepin cream in relieving pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: A total of 270 patients with atopic dermatitis who had daily moderate to severe pruritus for at least 1 week were enrolled in the double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multicenter study. Treatment was randomly assigned: 5% doxepin cream or vehicle cream was applied twice on the day of the baseline visit and four times daily for the remainder of the 7-day trial. RESULTS: Relief of pruritus was achieved in 85% of doxepin-treated patients and 57% of vehicle-treated patients by day 7; a majority of these positive responses occurred during the first 24 hours. Pruritus severity scores demonstrated significantly greater improvement with topical doxepin at each study visit (p < 0.01). Visual analogue scales for pruritus severity and pruritus relief showed similar improvement in the doxepin-treated group. At each of three visits, the physician's global evaluation for relief of pruritus also showed significant improvement in the doxepin treatment group (p < 0.01). The physician's global evaluations of eczema significantly favored topical doxepin on day 7 (p < 0.01). Nineteen patients withdrew from the study because of adverse effects (doxepin, n = 16; vehicle, n = 3). The most commonly reported were localized stinging or burning (doxepin group, n = 39; vehicle group, n = 34) and drowsiness (doxepin group, n = 37; vehicle group, n = 3), all of which decreased in frequency and severity over time. CONCLUSION: Topical doxepin is effective in reducing pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. It has an apparent short-term low risk of major side effects or sensitization.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Uremic pruritus: roles of parathyroid hormone and substance P.

BACKGROUND: Most patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis have pruritus, but its underlying mechanism remains unknown. Secondary hyperparathyroidism is another common problem in these patients, but its role in uremic pruritus is controversial. Capsaicin can deplete substance P from the peripheral neurons and is known to be effective in the treatment of pain and itching. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the role of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and substance P in uremic pruritus and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: The study contained two phases. In phase I, we analyzed the correlation between the intensity of itching and serum levels of intact PTH. In phase II, patients with moderate to severe pruritus were placed into two groups: one with high PTH levels and one with low levels. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of capsaicin 0.025% cream was conducted in phase II. RESULTS: Serum levels of intact PTH did not correlate with the intensity of pruritus and did not significantly change during treatment with capsaicin or placebo. Capsaicin was significantly more effective in alleviating uremic pruritus than the placebo, and no serious side effects were noted. CONCLUSION: Uremic pruritus is not related to PTH. Substance P may act as a neurotransmitter in uremic pruritus and topical capsaicin can be used in the treatment of localized pruritus.

Calcium↗

Effective treatment of pruritus in atopic dermatitis using H1 antihistamines (second-generation antihistamines): changes in blood histamine and tryptase levels.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory and allergic skin disease that almost always begins in childhood and follows a course of remittance and flare-up. AD is characterized by intense pruritus and itchiness that can be triggered by an interplay of genetic, immunologic and environmental factors. Of the mediators, histamine is one of the most potent inducers of pruritus. Serum tryptase, which is also a mediator, may be used to examine allergic disease as well. The development of minimal sedation H1 antihistamines (second-generation antihistamines) has revolutionized treatment of allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE: The present study examines the efficacy of second-generation antihistamines in relieving pruritus due to AD. In addition, the relationship between AD pruritus and antihistamine therapy was analyzed by measuring the blood histamine and tryptase levels. METHODS: Thirty-two AD patients were recruited and underwent second-generation antihistamine therapy for 2 weeks. Seventeen received combined topical corticosteroid treatment (Group 1) and the other 15 did not receive steroid treatment (Group 2). The Severity Index and Pruritus Score were assessed as an AD clinical activity index and compared with baseline data. RESULTS: Both the Severity Index and Pruritus Score improved significantly in Group 1 (P<0.001, P<0.05). Group 2 demonstrated a significant improvement in Pruritus Score (P<0.05), but not in the Severity Index. Plasma histamine levels were significantly higher in AD at baseline compared with healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Following antihistamine therapy, these levels decreased significantly in both AD groups (P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between baseline blood histamine and typtase levels. However, this correlation was not evident following treatment. This may reflect insufficient detection capabilities of the measuring assay. The present results suggest that second-generation antihistamine therapy provides an effective clinical treatment for AD, with a notable improvement in pruritus. Furthermore, antihistamine therapy reduced plasma histamine levels in AD patients. These findings further suggest that high blood histamine and tryptase levels in AD patients contribute to the pathogenesis of this disorder, including the onset of pruritus.

Adult↗

Pharmacokinetic aspects of chloroquine-induced pruritus: influence of dose and evidence for varied extent of metabolism of the drug.

The significance of a pharmacokinetics basis in chloroquine (CQ)-induced pruritus was investigated by determining the disposition of the drug in two groups of volunteers; pruritus positive and pruritus negative. Single oral dose of 600 mg CQ was administered to each of 36 volunteers, 18 for each of the two groups. After a washout period of 9 months, 150 mg single oral dose of the drug was given to 12 of the same volunteers, six each from the two groups. Blood and urine samples were collected at predetermined times following administration of each dose. Concentrations of CQ and its major metabolite, desethylchloroquine (CQM), were measured in plasma and urine using an established HPLC method. Results showed that the ratio, AUC (CQ)/AUC (CQM), as well as AUC(0-48 h) and 24-h urinary CQ excretion were all significantly higher (P<0.05) in pruritus-positive compared to pruritus-negative volunteers, following administration of the 600-mg CQ dose. Also, urinary drug-metabolite ratios monitored over 0-48 h postdose were markedly higher in the pruritus positive group. However, after administration of the 150-mg dose, 24-h urinary CQ collection and urinary drug-metabolite ratios were highly comparable between the two groups (P>0.1). This study indicates that there might be a decreased metabolism of CQ in subjects susceptible to CQ-induced pruritus following ingestion of a therapeutic dose. It also suggests that the extent of metabolism of CQ in this group may be influenced by the dose of the drug. Comparatively higher CQ levels in pruritus susceptible subjects may possibly be responsible for the pruritus experienced by such individuals when given therapeutic regimen.

Adult↗

High incidence of pruritus after large doses of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) infusions.

BACKGROUND: There are several studies indicating a correlation between treatment with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and pruritus. In order to see whether there is a possible dose-response relationship between HES and pruritus, we retrospectively studied 50 patients who had received HES in varying doses (cumulative dose 500-19500 ml) as hemodilution therapy after subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS: Of 50 consecutive patients, 6 were excluded due to severe neurological sequelae. A questionnaire was sent to the remaining 44 patients at 6 months (5-12 months) median (range) after the end of HES treatment. RESULTS: We received answers from 37 patients, of whom 54% reported pruritus. On average pruritus lasted for 15 weeks. There was significantly more pruritus in patients who received more than 5000 ml of HES versus those who received less than 5000 ml (P=0.023). Pruritus had a delayed onset and appeared as pruritic crises lasting for 2-30 min. It had a patchy distribution in most patients and no predilected locations. In 4 patients (20%) the pruritus lasted longer than 21 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that there is a dose-dependency for the incidence of HES-induced pruritus, and that in some cases the pruritus may be severe and long-lasting.

Blood Volume↗

Addition of fexofenadine to a topical corticosteroid reduces the pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis in a 1-week randomized, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine, a nonsedating, H1-receptor selective antihistamine, exhibits consistent efficacy and safety in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis is considered to be induced, in part, by histamine. Therefore, we thought that fexofenadine may be useful in the relief of pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of twice-daily fexofenadine hydrochloride (HCl) 60 mg vs. placebo in reducing the pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: In this randomized, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients (aged >or= 16 years) with atopic dermatitis underwent a 1-week placebo lead-in period, followed by randomization to fexofenadine HCl 60 mg twice daily or placebo for 1 week. All patients also received topical treatment with 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate twice daily throughout the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change in pruritus score from baseline. Patients reflectively recorded pruritus scores twice daily (day and night) using a five-point scale (0 = none; 4 = very severe). RESULTS: Fexofenadine (n = 201) significantly decreased the severity of pruritus compared with placebo (n = 199) (mean change in score -0.75 (unadjusted 95% confidence interval [-0.88, -0.62]) vs. -0.5 [-0.62, -0.38], respectively; P = 0.0005). This improvement was seen after just 1 day of treatment (P = 0.039) and was maintained throughout the treatment period (P = 0.019). Compared with placebo, fexofenadine significantly improved both diurnal (P = 0.0001) and nocturnal pruritus (P = 0.013). In addition, significantly more patients in the fexofenadine group experienced a reduction in the ratio of pruritus area to body surface area compared with those in the placebo group (P = 0.007). The incidence of adverse events was low and similar across all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fexofenadine HCl 60 mg twice daily demonstrated a rapid, significant improvement in the pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis, with a safety profile equivalent to that of placebo.

Adolescent↗

Continuous epidural butorphanol relieves pruritus associated with epidural morphine infusions in children.

We examined the efficacy of epidural butorphanol to either prevent or relieve pruritus associated with epidural morphine infusion in children. Forty-six children were randomized to receive either epidural morphine (M) or epidural M with butorphanol (B) for postoperative analgesia. They received bupivacaine and either M 50 microg.kg-1 or the same dose of M plus B 10 microg.kg-1. Following surgery, a continuous infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine with either M 20 microg.ml-1 or M 20 microg.ml-1 + B 4 microg.ml-1 was given at a rate of 0.3 ml.kg-1.h-1. Pain scores and pruritus scores were recorded every 4 h during epidural infusion. Subjects with a pruritus score=2 received diphenhydramine 0.5 mg.kg-1 i.v. and were switched to an alternate epidural infusion; subjects receiving M (group M) were switched to M+B while subjects receiving M+B (group B) were switched to hydromorphone (H) 4 microg.ml-1. There was no difference in the initial incidence of pruritus (group M 11/18; group B 13/28). No subject in group M required a second change of epidural infusion because of continued pruritus after being switched to M+B; five of 13 subjects in group B continued to experience pruritus after being switched to H and required a second change of epidural infusion or an alternate analgesic modality (P=0.038). The median pruritus score in the first 24 h after changing epidural infusions was 0 in subjects in group MDelta (changed from M to M+B) and 1 in subjects in group BDelta (changed from M+B to H; P=0.012). While the median sedation score in the first 24 h was 1 in both groups, there was a greater incidence of sedation scores of 2 in group B than group M (28% vs 12.3%; P=0.021). B 10 microg.kg-1 was not effective in preventing pruritus associated with bolus epidural administration of M 50 microg.kg-1 in children. B 1.2 microg.kg-1. h-1 was effective in relieving pruritus associated with continuous epidural infusion of M 6 microg.kg-1.h-1.

Adolescent↗

Acupuncture in haemodialysis patients at the Quchi (LI11) acupoint for refractory uraemic pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Uraemic pruritus is a common problem in end-stage renal failure patients. Traditional therapies produce marginal or no results. Acupuncture has been reported to be effective. The aim of this randomized, controlled study was to validate a single acupoint for relieving uraemic pruritus. METHODS: We randomized 40 patients with refractory uraemic pruritus into two groups. In group 1 (n = 20), acupuncture was applied unilaterally at the Quchi (LI11) acupoint thrice weekly for 1 month. In group 2 (controls, n = 20), acupuncture was applied at a non-acupoint 2 cm lateral to Quchi (LI11) thrice weekly for 1 month. Subjects responded to a pruritus score questionnaire given before and at the end of the 1 month treatment and at a 3 months follow-up. The results of the pruritus scores were analysed with the repeated measures general linear model to examine the effect of acupuncture on pruritus scores. RESULTS: In group 1, pruritus scores before and after acupuncture and at the 3 month follow-up were 38.3+/-4.3, 17.3+/-5.5 and 16.5+/-4.9, and in group 2 (controls) they were 38.3+/-4.3, 37.5+/-3.2 and 37.1+/-5, respectively. Laboratory tests showed no significant differences between the two groups. Pruritus scores were significantly lower after acupuncture and at the 3 month follow-up, P<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture at the Quchi (LI11) acupoint is an easy, safe and effective means of relieving uraemic pruritus.

Acupuncture↗

Subhypnotic doses of propofol do not relieve pruritus induced by intrathecal morphine after cesarean section.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine whether subhypnotic doses of propofol effectively relieve pruritus in women who received intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery. Twenty-nine women who developed pruritus after undergoing an elective cesarean section and receiving intrathecal morphine (0.25 mg) for postoperative analgesia were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, double-blind study. The women were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mL of propofol (n = 17) or 1 mL of placebo (n = 12) I.V. Pruritus was evaluated 5 min after treatment. In the absence of successful treatment, the women received another 1 mL of the same drug. Pruritus was again evaluated 5 min after the second dose. We found that pruritus was successfully treated twice in the propofol group and once in the placebo group (P = not significant). The antipruritic action of propofol lasted for up to 6 h in one woman and 15 min in the other. The one success in the placebo group lasted for 15 min. We conclude that the success rate of propofol in treating pruritus in women who received intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery is not significantly different from that of placebo. IMPLICATIONS: Pruritus is a common and bothersome side effect of neuraxial opioids after cesarean section. Subhypnotic doses of I.V. propofol (10 mg) have been used to treat pruritus caused by neuraxial opioids. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we found that propofol does not relieve pruritus in women who underwent cesarean section and received intrathecal morphine sulfate (0.25 mg) for postoperative pain relief.

Adult↗

Ondansetron is effective to treat spinal or epidural morphine-induced pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Spinally and epidurally administered morphine is frequently associated with pruritus. Isolated case reports indicate that ondansetron may be effective in this context. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of ondansetron to treat this side effect. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 100 patients with pruritus (> 4 on a visual analog scale, on which 0 represents no pruritus and 10 represents worst pruritus imaginable) after spinal or epidural administration of morphine, received either 8 mg ondansetron intravenously (ondansetron group) in 100 ml NaCl 0.9% or vehicle (placebo group). A decrease of more than 4 points on the visual analog scale 60 min after treatment was considered a success. Changes in levels of pain and sedation, hemodynamic values, and other side effects were checked regularly. The presence or absence of pruritus was assessed for the last time 24 h later. RESULTS: The two groups were similar for demographic characteristics, the route of administration of morphine, and severity of pruritus at the beginning of the study. The ondansetron group showed a success rate of 70% versus 30% for the placebo group (P > 0.05). Among the successfully treated patients, three (9%) in the ondansetron group and six (40%) in the placebo group reported the recurrence of pruritus (P < 0.05). Among the successfully treated patients, none complained of residual pruritus 24 h later. No changes in pain or sedation levels were noted. Hemodynamic values remained stable, hemoglobin oxygen saturation did not decrease, and no other side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The administration of 8 mg ondansetron intravenously is an effective treatment for spinally or epidurally administered morphine-induced pruritus. In this clinical condition the treatment is safe and well tolerated.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Hemodialysis-related pruritus and associated cutaneous manifestations.

BACKGROUND: Uremic pruritus is one of the most common disabling problems in patients with chronic renal failure. Few studies have evaluated itching and cutaneous manifestations in hemodialysis-dependent patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to identify the prevalence of pruritus and cutaneous changes affecting patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: The degree of itching in 70 patients treated at the Haemek Medical Center Hemodialysis Unit, in northern Israel, was scored according to presence and severity. We examined the relationship between the quality of dialysis and the frequency of pruritus, and identified concurrent cutaneous disorders. RESULTS: Pruritus was a common problem in the study cohort and affected 74.3% of hemodialysis patients at some point. The main characteristics of pruritus were a general pattern in 65.7% and mild intensity in 78.3% of observed patients. Duration of hemodialysis varied between 3 months and 13 years. There was no correlation between occurrence of pruritus and demographic or medical parameters (sex, type of kidney disease, regular medications or duration of hemodialysis) of the patients. Higher dialysis efficacy, as expressed by dialyser clearance, volume distribution of area, dialysis duration (Kt/v), may reduce the prevalence of pruritus (P < 0.02). None of the blood and chemical values considered (hemoglobin, creatinine, urea, phosphorus, calcium, albumin, parathormone and alkaline phosphatase) revealed any statistically relevant differences between pruritus groups. The appearance of foot ulcers was different between diabetic and nondiabetic individuals undergoing hemodialysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pruritus is still a common problem in hemodialysis-dependent patients. The prevalence of xerosis and excoriations was high in patients undergoing replacement therapy. Efficient replacement hemodialysis may provide a clinical benefit.

Adult↗

Pilot study of bright-light therapy reflected toward the eyes for the pruritus of chronic liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: It is proposed that the pruritus of cholestasis is, in part, centrally mediated by endogenous opioid peptides. The expression of these peptides and their receptors on neurons displays a circadian rhythm, as does the scratching activity in patients with cholestasis and pruritus. Because light has regulatory effects on circadian rhythms via retinothalamic pathways, we hypothesized that bright-light therapy (BLT) reflected toward the eyes might alter the pruritus of cholestasis. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of BLT on this form of pruritus. METHODS: Eight patients with chronic liver disease of different etiologies and pruritus were studied in an open-label, pilot study of 8-wk duration. BLT (10,000 lux) was administered for up to 60 min twice a day. Pruritus was assessed subjectively by a visual analog scale from which a visual analog score (VAS) was derived, and objectively, by a scratching activity monitoring system that recorded hourly scratching activity (HSA). RESULTS: In seven of the eight patients studied, the mean HSA was lower during BLT. BLT was associated with a mean decrease in HSA of 32.2% (p = 0.123). The mean VAS for pruritus was lower in six patients during BLT; the mean VAS score derived from the eight patients studied decreased by 42% (p = 0.05) during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this short-term study suggest that the pruritus of cholestasis is responsive to bright light reflected toward the eyes and that in some patients, BLT may ameliorate this form of pruritus.

Adult↗

Hemodialysis-related pruritus: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of capsaicin 0.025% cream.

Pruritus is a significant symptom among patients receiving hemodialysis. However, its underlying mechanisms remain obscure. Substance P, a neuropeptide, has been implicated in the mediation of pain and some itch sensations. Local application of capsaicin depletes the peripheral neurons of substance P and may block the conduction of pain or pruritus. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of capsaicin 0.025% cream in the treatment of hemodialysis-related pruritus and to further explore the underlying pathomechanism. Nineteen hemodialysis patients with idiopathic, moderate (n = 5) to severe (n = 14) pruritus were examined in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study and 17 of them completed the study. Topical agent of capsaicin or placebo base cream was applied to localized areas of pruritus 4 times a day. The severity of pruritus and treatment-related side effects (cutaneous burning/stinging sensations, dryness, or erythema) were evaluated weekly. The results showed (1) that 14 of 17 patients reported marked relief and 5 of these 14 patients had complete remission of pruritus during capsaicin treatment (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, 2p < 0.001); (2) capsaicin was significantly more effective than placebo (Mann-Whitney rank sum test, 2p < 0.001) and a prolonged antipruritic effect was observed 8 weeks posttreatment; (3) no serious side effects were noted during the study and (4) there were no significant changes in serum concentrations of albumin, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, or intact parathyroid hormone during the treatment with either capsaicin or placebo. In summary, the present study indicates indirectly that idiopathic pruritus in some patients on maintenance hemodialysis may be transmitted by substance P from the peripheral sensory neurons to the central nervous system. Topical capsaicin with the unique pharmacological effect is demonstrated to markedly improve the pruritus of these patients.

Administration, Topical↗

Naltrexone does not relieve uremic pruritus: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

Improvement of uremic pruritus was reported under short-term administration of the mu-receptor antagonists naltrexone and naloxone. The aim of the present study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of the oral mu-receptor antagonist naltrexone during a 4-wk treatment period in patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. A placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of uremic patients with persistent, treatment-resistant pruritus was performed. Of 422 patients screened between December 1997 and June 1998, 93 suffered from pruritus and 23 were eligible for the study. Patients were started either with a 4-wk naltrexone sequence (50 mg/d) or matched placebo. This was followed by a 7-d washout, and patients continued with a 4-wk sequence of the alternate medication. Pruritus intensity was scored daily by a visual analogue scale (VAS) and weekly by a detailed score assessing scratching activity, distribution of pruritus, and frequency of pruritus-related sleep disturbance. Sixteen of 23 patients completed the study. During the naltrexone period, pruritus decreased by 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.7 to 39.6) on the VAS and by 17.6% (95% CI, 4.2 to 31.1) on the detailed score. In comparison, pruritus decreased by 16.9% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.9) on the VAS and by 22.3% (95% CI, 9.3 to 35.2) on the detailed score during the placebo period. The difference between the naltrexone and the placebo treatment period was not statistically significant. Nine of 23 patients complained of gastrointestinal disturbances during the naltrexone period compared with only one of 23 patients during the placebo period (P < 0.05). These results show that treatment of uremic pruritus with naltrexone is ineffective. In addition, a high incidence of adverse effects was observed during treatment with naltrexone.

Administration, Oral↗