Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PROPIONATES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

High dose fluticasone propionate, 1 mg daily, versus fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, or budesonide, 1.6 mg daily, in patients with chronic severe asthma. International Study Group.

Airway inflammation is now regarded as fundamental in the pathogenesis of asthma and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids has proved effective. There is a need for drugs in this category with higher topical potency but fewer side-effects than those presently available. A double-blind, parallel group study was conducted in 671 patients with severe asthma (already taking between 0.8-2.0 mg of inhaled corticosteroid daily) to compare the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 1 mg daily, to fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, and budesonide (BUD), 1.6 mg daily, delivered via a metered-dose inhaler. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and usage of rescue medication were recorded daily by the patient. At each clinic visit (-2, 0, 3 and 6 weeks) morning serum cortisol levels, bone markers and spirometry were assessed. The changes in mean morning PEF from baseline (weeks 1-6) were: FP 2 mg daily +24 l.min-1; FP 1 mg daily +21 l.min-1; BUD 1.6 mg daily +13 l.min-1. A similar rank order for the three treatments was seen for evening PEF, clinic spirometry, reduction of diurnal PEF variation, symptom scores, and requirement for rescue bronchodilators. The mean serum cortisol levels remained well within the normal range in all three groups. Analysis of the geometric mean cortisol ratio (treatment/baseline ratio after 6 weeks treatment) showed a changed rank order, the values being: FP 1 mg daily 1.04; BUD 1.6 mg daily 0.97; FP 2 mg daily 0.88.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aerosols↗
PubMed1978

[Comparison of estradiol benzoate and dihydrotestosterone propionate with testosterone propionate on the induction of male-like sexual behavior in female sheep ovariectomized as adults].

Daily I/M injections of 200 microgram of oestradiol benzoate induce in female Sheep, ovariectomized as adults, male-like sexual reactions similar to what is obtained with 10 mg testosterone propionate per day. Simultaneously, a permanent female sexual receptivity is observed. Oestradiol benzoate at the dose of 20 microgram/day, and dihydrotestosterone propionate (10 mg/day) are both totally ineffective. The result support the hypothesis of the necessity of the aromatization of testosterone for the action on sexual behaviour.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Biliary and pancreatic exocrine secretions via endogenous secretin by intestinal infusion of propionate and propionate analogues in piglets.

1. The secretory responses of hepatic bile and exocrine pancreas by intraduodenal infusion of propionate (PA), 3Cl-PA, 2Cl-PA, 3Br-PA and 2Br-PA solutions were examined in anesthetized piglets. 2. Pancreatic juice and protein secretions were enhanced by infusion of PA and PA analogue solutions of pH 2.0 following increase of plasma secretin level but not pH 7.0. The order of response time was as follows: 3Br-PA greater than 2Cl-PA greater than 2Br-PA greater than 3Cl-PA greater than PA. 3. The response of bile flow depended on endogenous secretin and showed almost the same pattern as that of pancreatic juice secretion. 4. The results suggested that pancreatic exocrine secretion via endogenous secretin was not always dependent on the dissociation constant of weak acids.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Activation of Epstein-Barr virus expression in human lymphoblastoid P3HR-1 and Raji cells with propionic acid and with culture fluids of propionic acid-producing anaerobes.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated early (EA) and virus capsid antigens (VCA) were efficiently induced in the viral genome-carrying human lymphoblastoid cells, P3HR-1 and Raji, by the culture fluids of Propionibacterium acnes, P. avidum, P. lymphophilum and Arachnia propionica, the anaerobes which are commonly seen among the normal flora of man. The active principle for EBV-induction in the 2 cell lines was the propionic acid produced by the microbes and such activity was shown to correlate with the fatty acid content of the culture media.

Antigens, Viral↗
PubMed2004

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in a Single Inhaler Device versus theophylline+fluticasone propionate in patients with COPD.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy in terms of improvement in symptoms and lung function of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SLM/FP) combination administered through the Diskus inhaler versus theophylline (THEO) added to FP Diskus in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Eighty patients were randomized to receive 4 months of treatment in one of two treatment groups: (1) fixed combination of SLM 50 microg and FP 500 microg Diskus, 1 inhalation twice daily; or (2) FP Diskus 500 microg, 1 inhalation twice daily, plus oral titrated THEO twice daily. Patients attended the clinic before and after 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of treatment for evaluations of pulmonary function, and dyspnea, which was assessed using an analogic visual scale. Also the supplemental salbutamol use was measured. RESULTS: . Sixty-six patients completed the 4-month treatment period: 37 patients receiving SLM/FP and 29 patients receiving THEO+FP. Patients were withdrawn for various reasons, the most common of which were poor compliance with the protocol, exacerbation and GI events. A gradual increase in FEV(1) was observed with each treatment. Maximum significant increases in FEV(1) over baseline values that were observed after 4 months of treatment were as follows: SLM/FP 0.172 l (95% CI: 0.084-0.260) and THEO+FP 0.155 l (95% CI: 0.054-0.256). SLM/FP experienced significantly (p<0.05) greater improvements in dyspnea, and required significantly fewer supplemental salbutamol treatments than the THEO+FP group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SLM/FP combination may provide substantial benefits in both physiologic and clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients with COPD. It also causes a more effective control than THEO+FP.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.

BACKGROUND: One approach to treating allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is the concomitant use of an intranasal spray such as fluticasone propionate to alleviate nasal symptoms and a topical or systemic agent to relieve ocular symptoms. It has not yet been determined whether a topical or systemic agent is more effective for the latter purpose. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy of combined use of fluticasone and olopatadine with combined use of fluticasone and fexofenadine in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: This 2-site, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study employed the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model, a standardized method of inducing ocular and nasal signs and symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. At visit 1, subjects underwent CAC to determine the dose of allergen required to elicit a positive reaction. The allergen dose was confirmed at visit 2, and, according to a randomization schedule, subjects were dispensed fluticasone, olopatadine, and placebo pill; fluticasone, fexofenadine, and tear substitute; or placebo nasal spray, placebo pill, and tear substitute. CAC took place at visit 3, after patients had used the assigned medications for 2 weeks. Study medication was instilled 2 hours before CAC, after which allergic signs and symptoms were graded on standardized scales. The primary efficacy variables were ocular itching, ocular redness, and overall nasal symptoms. RESULTS: Eighty subjects completed the study: 30 received fluticasone and olopatadine, 30 fluticasone and fexofenadine, and 20 placebo. Women constituted 63.8% of the study population and men 36.3%; 91.3% were white, 3.8% black, 2.5% Hispanic, 1.3% Asian, and 1.3% other. Concomitant use of fluticasone and olopatadine produced significantly greater improvements in ocular itching at 3 and 7 minutes after CAC compared with fluticasone and fexofenadine (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in redness scores between groups; however, concomitant use of fluticasone and olopatadine produced significantly greater improvements in redness at 2 time points in each of the 3 vessel beds (ciliary, conjunctival, and episcleral) compared with placebo, and fluticasone and fexofenadine produced significantly greater improvement in redness at 1 time point in I vessel bed compared with placebo (both comparisons, P < 0.05). The 2 treatments had similar effects on total nasal symptom efficacy scores. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, concomitant use of the topical agents fluticasone and olopatadine was more effective than concomitant use of fluticasone plus fexofenadine for overall treatment of the signs and symptoms of induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Fluticasone propionate 50 micrograms BID versus 100 micrograms BID in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. Fluticasone Propionate Study Group.

The aim of this multicenter, double-masked study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two different doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder--50 micrograms and 100 micrograms--administered BID via a multidose powder inhaler with those of placebo in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period, 263 patients were randomized to treatment with twice-daily placebo (n = 92), fluticasone 50 micrograms (n = 85), or fluticasone 100 micrograms (n = 86) for 12 weeks. One hundred sixty-six (63%) patients were male, and 224 (85%) were white, with a mean age of 8 years. Two hundred twenty-one (84%) patients were atopic, and 167 (63%) had been asthmatic for 1 to 5 years. Baseline mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were 207 L/min, 199 L/min, and 194 L/min, and baseline percentages of predicted normal values were 86%, 80%, and 81% for the groups receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. At the end of the first week of treatment, patients in both fluticasone groups had significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did those receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 4 L/min, 22 L/min, and 26 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. At the end point (the last evaluable visit), patients in both fluticasone groups continued to have significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did patients receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 17 L/min, 50 L/min, and 57 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. Changes in the percentage of predicted values by end point were 8%, 20%, and 26% with placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. The probability of remaining in the study, according to predefined withdrawal criteria, indicated a significant treatment difference in favor of fluticasone. Withdrawal criteria were met by 63%, 42%, and 29% of patients receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. This study clearly demonstrates the superiority of fluticasone 50 and 100 micrograms BID over placebo in the treatment of persistent asthma in children.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

The addition of salmeterol to fluticasone propionate versus increasing the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma. Salmeterol Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines define inhaled corticosteroids such as fluticasone propionate (FP) as the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding salmeterol therapy to patients who remain symptomatic while receiving FP as compared with increasing the dose of FP. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind study conducted over 24-weeks, 437 patients aged 12 years and older and receiving FP 88 microg twice daily for 2 to 4 weeks were randomly assigned to receive either salmeterol (42 microg twice daily) or FP 220 microg twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was morning peak expiratory flow. Secondary measures included FEV1, symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, and supplemental albuterol use. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: The addition of salmeterol resulted in significantly greater improvements in lung function and symptom control as compared with increasing the dose of FP. Over weeks 1 to 24, morning peak expiratory flow was increased by 47 L/min from baseline with salmeterol treatment as compared with 24 L/min with FP 220 microg twice daily (P < .001) while the percent of symptom-free days increased from baseline by 26% of days as compared with 10% of days (P < .001). The adverse event profiles were similar between groups and fewer exacerbations were reported with salmeterol treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of salmeterol therapy to patients who remain symptomatic while using a low dose of FP was clinically and statistically superior to increasing the dose of FP.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Steroid-sparing effects of fluticasone propionate 100 microg and salmeterol 50 microg administered twice daily in a single product in patients previously controlled with fluticasone propionate 250 microg administered twice daily.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent use of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist provides better overall asthma control than the use of higher doses of ICS alone. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether fluticasone propionate (FP) combined with salmeterol in the Diskus device can be used to reduce the dose of ICS in patients currently stable on medium-dose ICS while maintaining asthma control. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12- to 24-week trial consisting of a 3-part run-in period. The run-in period was designed to first establish FP 250 microg administered twice a day (bid) via Diskus as the minimum effective dose. During run-in period 1, patients received FP 220 microg bid or the equivalent for 10 to 14 days. Controlled patients moved to run-in period 2 (5-28 days), which assessed asthma stability on FP 100 microg bid administered via Diskus. Only patients who became unstable on FP 100 microg bid were eligible to enter run-in period 3 (26-30 days), during which they were placed on FP 250 microg bid and those regaining asthma control were eligible for randomization. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained in the study with no evidence of worsening asthma. Secondary efficacy measures included FEV1, morning peak expiratory flow, percent of symptom-free days, and daily albuterol use. RESULTS: Only 5% of patients treated with FP100/salmeterol withdrew because of worsening asthma in the first 12 weeks; this compared with 7% in the FP250 group. All patients from a subset of sites continued in the study for an additional 12 weeks; only an additional 1% of patients treated with either FP100/salmeterol or FP250 withdrew because of worsening asthma. Secondary efficacy measures confirmed primary efficacy results. CONCLUSION: In patients requiring FP250 bid for asthma stability, FP100/salmeterol bid was steroid-sparing, allowing a 60% reduction in the FP dose while maintaining overall asthma control.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Comparison between compliance of fluticasone propionate diskhaler and of fluticasone propionate diskus in adult bronchial asthma patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) play a central role in the management of asthma, new drug delivery systems for fluticasone propionate, Diskhaler (FPdh) and Diskus (FPdk), were developed. However, few studies have focused on compliance with these drug delivery systems, which can influence drug efficacy. Hence, we compared compliance with FPdk versus that with FPdh. METHODS: Data were obtained from a survey of pharmacists dispensing anti-asthmatic drugs to adult asthma patients who visited participating pharmacies between October 2002 and November 2003. Patients were limited to regular users of FPdh or FPdk whose medication had not been changed for >6 months before the survey. Compliance and daily administration frequency of ICS were evaluated on the basis of pharmaceutical records. Data on asthma status and various other factors affecting ICS compliance were obtained by questionnaire. RESULTS: Data were acquired on 337 patients. There were no significant differences in gender, age, and duration between the FPdk and FPdh groups. Although FPdk compliance was significantly higher than that of FPdh, conversely there was no significant difference in daily dose and administration frequency between the 2 groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of concomitant drug and in various influencing factors associated with drug compliance. Regarding compliance of concomitant drug, that of oral sustained-released theophylline was significantly lower in FPdk versus FPdh users. CONCLUSION: In the area of drug compliance, FPdk is superior to FPdh. Although the reason for this is unclear, it is probably due to the characteristics of FPdk itself.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1981

[Studies on toxicity of hydrocortisone 17-butyrate 21-propionate -1. Acute toxicity of hydrocortisone 17-butyrate 21-propionate and its analogues in mice, rats and dogs (author's transl)].

The acute toxicity of hydrocortisone 17-butyrate 21-propionate (HBP), hydrocortisone 17-butyrate (HB17) and hydrocortisone 21-butyrate (HB21) were investigated by three administration routes (s.c., i. p. and p. o.) in mice, rats and dogs. In the case of HBP, LD50 by oral administration was the highest, and followed by subcutaneous and intraperitoneal administration in mice and rats. And LD50 of HB17 and HB21 were not different from HBP in mice by subcutaneous administration. The depression of spontaneous movement and respiratory rate, ptosis, larcrymation and the collapse were commonly observed in all drugs, and it was independent of administration routes. The autopsy revealed the atrophy of thymus, spleen and adrenal glands, the supprative nodules of heart and liver and the ulcers of alimentary tract in mice and rats. But the changes observed in mice and rats were recognized when 1000 mg/kg of HBP was administered to dogs subcutaneously. Many of these changes were common to glucocorticoids, and the LD50 of HBP was rather high compared with other synthetic steroids; therefore, HBP was among less toxic steroid.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Cost effectiveness of fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol versus fluticasone propionate plus montelukast in the treatment of persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic disease, the two main components of which are inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol, a strategy that treats both main components of asthma, has been recently compared with FP plus montelukast in a randomised clinical trial. The present study reports economic evaluation of these two strategies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative cost effectiveness when persistent asthma is treated with FP/salmeterol 100/50 microg twice daily administered via a single Diskus inhaler device versus treatment with FP 100 microg twice daily via a Diskus inhaler plus oral montelukast 10mg once daily. STUDY DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by applying cost unit data to resource utilisation data collected prospectively during a US randomised, double-blind, 12-week trial of FP/salmeterol (n = 222) versus FP + montelukast (n = 225). Patients were > or =15 years of age and were symptomatic despite inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Efficacy measurements in this analysis included improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and symptom-free days. Direct costs included those related to study drugs, emergency room department visits, unscheduled physician visits, treatment of drug-related adverse events (oral candidiasis), and rescue medication (salbutamol [albuterol]). The study assumed a US third-party payer's perspective with costs in 2001 US dollars. RESULTS: Treatment with FP/salmeterol resulted in a significantly higher proportion (p < 0.001) of patients who achieved a > or =12% increase in FEV(1) than treatment with FP + montelukast (54% [95% CI 47%, 61%] vs 32% [95% CI 26%, 38%]). Lower daily costs and greater efficacy of FP/salmeterol resulted in a cost-effectiveness ratio of US6.77 dollars (95% CI US5.99 dollars, US7.66 dollars) per successfully treated patient in the FP/salmeterol group compared with US14.59 dollars (95% CI US12.12 dollars, US17.77 dollars) for FP + montelukast. In addition, FP/salmeterol achieved similar efficacy in terms of symptom-free days compared with FP + montelukast (31% [95% CI 26%, 35%] vs 27% [95% CI 23%, 32%]), but at a significantly lower daily per-patient cost (US3.64 dollars [95% CI US3.60, US3.68 dollars] vs US4.64 dollars [95% CI US4.56 dollars, US4.73 dollars]). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the stability of the results over a range of assumptions. CONCLUSION: From a US third-party payer's perspective, these findings suggest that treating the two main components of asthma (inflammation and bronchoconstriction) with FP/salmeterol may not only be a more cost-effective strategy but may actually lead to cost savings compared with the addition of montelukast to low-dose FP in patients with persistent asthma. The results were found to be robust over a range of assumptions.

Acetates↗
PubMed2004

[Effectiveness and safety of fluticasone propionate in therapy of children suffering from asthma. Part II. Safety aspects of therapy with fluticasone propionate in asthmatic children].

Inhaled administration of glucocorticoid doesn't mean lack of systemic effects of drug. Bioavailability of steroid depends on oral absorption and absorption from respiratory system. In case of fluticasone propionate (FP) swallowed dose can be neglected because almost total (>99%) inactivation in liver during first pass. In second part of paper the most important safety parameters of therapy with FP are discussed, it means; influence on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, growth and bone metabolism. Interpretation of potential side effects should differentiate between abnormal value of laboratory test and clinically important symptoms. Adrenal suppression depends on dose of FP and was found even after low dose (about 200 microg per day), but clinical value of this findings is unknown. Prolonged administration of high doses can suppress hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; exceptionally, it can induce adrenal insufficiency. Recommended doses of FP given 1 to 2 years doesn't cause growth retardation. Long term studies on influence of drug on final height are needed. FP as other inhaled corticosteroids, may transiently alter bone metabolism. Till now there are no evidences that this drug, when prescribed appropriately in standard doses for asthma control, may decrease the bone mineral density or induce osteoporosis and may increase the risk of bone fractures in asthmatic children. Effective asthma control achieved with FP therapy permits normal activity and development of asthmatic children which prevails over exceptionally noticed side effects.

Administration, Inhalation↗