Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Metaphor”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Comprehending spoken metaphoric reference: a real-time analysis.

Speakers and writers often use metaphor to describe someone or something in a referential fashion (e.g., The creampuff didn't show up for the fight to refer to a cowardly boxer). Research has demonstrated that readers do not comprehend metaphoric reference as easily as they do literal reference (Gibbs, 1990; Onishi & Murphy, 1993). In two experiments, we used a naming version of the cross-modal lexical priming (CMLP) paradigm to monitor the time-course of comprehending spoken metaphoric reference. In Experiment 1, listeners responded to visual probe words of either a figurative or literal nature that were presented at offset or 1000 ms after a critical prime word. Significant facilitatory priming was observed at prime offset to probes consistent with the metaphorical interpretation of the figuratively referring description, yet no priming was found for either probe type at the downstream location. In Experiment 2, we partially replicated Experiment 1 results at prime offset and found no priming at a probe point placed 1000 ms upstream from prime onset. Taken together, the data from these two experiments indicate that listeners are able to comprehend metaphoric reference faster than literal reference. Moreover, the effect appears to be strongest at prime offset, suggesting that activation of the nonliteral interpretation is closely tied to the relationship between the figuratively referring description and the intended referent. Implications for theories of metaphor comprehension, as well as for research in spoken metaphor, are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors.

Two models of metaphor processing are contrasted. The structure-mapping model postulates an initially role-neutral alignment process, followed by directional projection of inferences. The attributive categorization model postulates role-specific processing throughout comprehension. To test between these models, the early stages of metaphor comprehension were probed using a technique based on S. Glucksberg, P. Gildea, and H. Bookin's (1982) finding that metaphorical meaning interferes with literal truthfulness judgments. In Experiment 1, interference effects did not differ between normal metaphors and metaphors with reversed terms, suggesting that initial processing is role-neutral. In Experiment 2, we again found no role dependence in interference effects, even for highly conventional metaphors. In Experiment 3, it was verified that (a) full comprehension is role-sensitive and (b) full comprehension reaction times (RTs) are far longer than interference RTs, buttressing the claim that interference is an early-stage effect. Overall, the results support the structure-mapping model of metaphor processing.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The career of metaphor.

A central question in metaphor research is how metaphors establish mappings between concepts from different domains. The authors propose an evolutionary path based on structure-mapping theory. This hypothesis--the career of metaphor--postulates a shift in mode of mapping from comparison to categorization as metaphors are conventionalized. Moreover, as demonstrated by 3 experiments, this processing shift is reflected in the very language that people use to make figurative assertions. The career of metaphor hypothesis offers a unified theoretical framework that can resolve the debate between comparison and categorization models of metaphor. This account further suggests that whether metaphors are processed directly or indirectly, and whether they operate at the level of individual concepts or entire conceptual domains, will depend both on their degree of conventionality and on their linguistic form.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Myocardial infarction patients' use of metaphors to share meaning and communicate underlying frames of experience.

The onset of a myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently associated with distinct sensations that may shape the personal meaning of the MI illness experience. Although highly important, patients may have difficulty communicating the personal meaning of the MI illness experience because of lack of congruence between the clinician's and patient's frames of experience. The frame of experience defines the context and agenda for encounters from each participant's perspective. This secondary analysis of data explored MI patients' use of metaphorical language to convey aspects of their underlying frame of experience. Specifically, this paper addressed (a) the structural and linguistic features of metaphorical language used by patients to describe MI pain, (b) the content and structure of associated patient metaphors, and (c) the similarities and differences between the content of patient metaphors and descriptions of MI pain. Our findings confirm that even in encounters characterized by clinician imposition of an organizing framework upon the patient encounter, patients use metaphors to reveal their underlying frame of experience and aspects of the personal meaning of the MI illness experience. Furthermore, although non-metaphorical descriptions provide insights into the patients' cognitive understanding of events associated with the MI, metaphorical descriptions are particularly helpful in eliciting aspects of the affective response to the MI.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Genomics: shifts in metaphorical landscape between 2000 and 2003.

This article examines the shifts and changes in the metaphors used to describe the human genome and the human genome project (HGP) between 2000 and 2003, with the year 2001 as a trigger for genomic and metaphorical reflection. We want to answer questions, such as: Did the findings announced in 2001 shake the metaphorical foundations on which the HGP had been built or not? Did novel metaphors capture the imagination of scientists and the public or did old metaphors survive throughout this period? What influence does the continuity or discontinuity in metaphorical framing of the HGP have on the public perception of the HGP as well as on its scientific understanding? To answer these questions we have systematically compared the metaphors used in one major scientific journal, Nature, and in one major UK newspaper, the online edition of the Guardian/The Observer during a period of two months around June 2000, February 2001 and April 2003.

Genome, Human↗
PubMed2005

Untying the Gordian knot of creation: metaphors for the Human Genome Project in Greek newspapers.

This article studies the metaphorical expressions used by newspapers to present the near completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP) to the Greek public in the year 2000. The analysis, based on cognitive metaphor theory, deals with the most frequent or captivating metaphors used to refer to the human genome, which give rise to both conventional and novel expressions. The majority of creative metaphorical expressions participate in the discourse of hope and promise propagated by the Greek media in an attempt to present the HGP and its outcome in a favorable light. Instances of the competing discourse of fear and danger are much rarer but can also be found in creative metaphorical expressions. Metaphors pertaining to the Greek culture or to ancient Greek mythology tend to carry a special rhetorical force. However, it will be shown that the Greek press strategically used most of the metaphors that circulated globally at the time, not only culture specific ones.

Chromosome Mapping↗
PubMed2002

Expressive metaphors in cancer narratives.

This article presents and interprets illness narratives, told by patients treated for cancer. The aim is to discuss the meaning of cancer metaphors. The interpretation focuses on the relationships of metaphors to bodily experience and to social and cultural levels. The experience of cancer and cancer therapy obviously involve the patient's body. To comprehend what is happening is a process full of uncertainty and obscurity. Metaphors, such as cancer "eating," are widespread and persistent while the meaning of that metaphor today mirrors new scientific and lay explanations of cancer and cancer treatment. Personal newly created metaphors express threatening experiences in which fear of losing oneself and fear of death are involved. Ambivalent hope in relation to treatment and caregivers is expressed. Creating new metaphors involves imaginatively using the available concepts and metaphors. Narrative communication gives access to patients' experiences of an unwanted and painful physiologic process leading to forced embodiment of sickness. Patients want consolation and must overcome solitude by articulating experience, being listened to, and, in this way, recreating and strengthening identity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Producing the magnum opus: a metaphor for nephrology nursing expertise acquisition.

AIM: This paper elucidates the nature of metaphor and the conditions necessary to its use as an analytic device in qualitative research, and describes how the use of metaphor assisted in the analytic processes of a grounded theory study of nephrology nursing expertise. BACKGROUND: The use of metaphor is pervasive in everyday thought, language and action. It is an important means for the comprehension and management of everyday life, and makes challenging or problematic concepts easier to explain. Metaphors are also pervasive in quantitative and qualitative research for the same reason. In both everyday life and in research, their use may be implicit or explicit. METHODS: The study using grounded theory methodology took place in one renal unit in New South Wales, Australia between 1999 and 2000 and included six non-expert and 11 expert nurses. It involved simultaneous data collection and analysis using participant observation, semi-structured interviews and review of nursing documentation. FINDINGS: A three stage skills-acquisitive process was identified in which an orchestral metaphor was used to explain the relationships between stages and to satisfactorily capture the data coded within each stage. CONCLUSION: Metaphors create images, clarify and add depth to meanings and, if used appropriately and explicitly in qualitative research, can capture data at highly conceptual levels. Metaphors also assist in explaining the relationship between findings in a clear and coherent manner.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1997

The use of metaphor by an artless first-time psychotherapist.

The experience in a psychiatric residency of being a psychotherapist for the first time can be overwhelming and anxiety-provoking. This paper examines a first psychotherapy case which utilizes a theory-distant approach based on the use of metaphor. Metaphorical theory is reviewed, and potential benefits and pitfalls of using metaphor are examined. An in-depth case study is done, focusing on the following six metaphors: Art as Psychotherapy; Psychotherapy as Art; The World Is a Trap; Mothers Are Martyrs; StepMothers Are Evil; and Artists Are Crazy. Each metaphor was utilized in multiple layers through the course of the therapy. Some of the current research in the use of metaphor in psychotherapy is reviewed. Through this approach, I was able to develop necessary psychotherapeutic skills without being overwhelmed by traditional theories such as Freudian, Object Relations or Self Psychology. I conclude that the use of metaphor with my first psychotherapy patient strengthened the therapeutic alliance, allowed an idiosyncratic language to develop in the therapy, structured recurrent themes, and permitted me to respect the patient's defenses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Metaphor, symbolic play, and logical thought in early childhood.

Development of the ability to understand diverse types of metaphor was examined in terms of play context (symbolic vs. constructive-object play), Piagetian operational level (preoperational vs. concrete-operational), and medium of presentation (pictures vs. words). Forty 4-year-olds and 80 6-year-olds (40 preoperational, 40 concrete-operational) were presented with six different types of metaphorical relationships (color, shape, physiognomic, cross-modal, psychological-physical, and taxonomic matches) in both pictures and words in a match-to-sample design. Results indicated that (a) constructive-object play, rather than symbolic play, facilitated the understanding of perceptual and taxonomic metaphor, suggesting differences in early styles of metaphoric usage; (b) despite previous findings, the study failed to replicate a relationship between operativity and metaphoric understanding; and (c) younger children did significantly better in the pictorial medium, suggesting a picture-superiority effect for more perceptible metaphorical relations (perceptual and physiognomic), whereas older children showed a word-superiority effect for more conceptual metaphors (psychological-physical and taxonomic).

Age Factors↗
PubMed1990

Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients.

Appreciation of metaphoric and nonmetaphoric alternative word meanings was assessed in 19 aphasic, left (LHD) and 15 non-aphasic, right (RHD) hemisphere brain-damaged stroke patients. With the one exception in the aphasic group, all patients were male. In an unspeeded sorting task, subjects responded on the basis of less frequent, alternative meanings of polysemous target words. Targets were either polysemous adjectives (e.g. "warm") having metaphoric alternative meanings (loving) or polysemous nouns (e.g., "pen") having non-metaphoric alternative meanings (writing implement, cage). Both patient groups performed worse overall than a group of nonbrain-damaged control subjects. Relative to the RHD patients, LHD patients showed a spared appreciation of metaphoric alternative meanings. In addition, LHD, but not RHD, patients performed better on metaphoric adjective trials when there was high similarity between a word's dominant and (metaphoric) alternative meaning. The results suggest a pervasive insensitivity of RHD patients to alternative interpretations of linguistic units, and a special role for the intact right hemisphere in lexical-semantic processes related to metaphor comprehension.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Using metaphor to read the organisation of the NHS. National Health Service.

The paper is concerned with the complexity of the British National Health Service (NHS) as an organisation and with different ways of seeing this. Morgan proposes that explanations of organisational life are based on metaphors which highlight particular interpretations (Morgan, G., 1986, Images of Organisation. London, Sage). The ability to "read" a complex phenomenon depends on being able to see how these different aspects co-exist. The study applies metaphoric thinking to the organisation of the NHS. Utilising documentary data sources, a diagnostic reading is made examining different metaphors to highlight key aspects of the situation. The metaphors of machine and organism are drawn from Morgan's conceptual scheme, those of religion and marketplace are proposed as of particular relevance to the NHS. In the religious metaphor the focus is on the mission of the NHS in terms of its founding principles of universality, comprehensiveness, equality and collectivism. Perceived as a machine the NHS is characterised as an organisation originally based on technocratic rationality and its subsequent history interpreted as moving towards increasingly centralised control. An alternative perspective on the same events is considered in terms of the organic metaphor. In this view the NHS is examined as an open system, which is devolved, decentralised, participative and responsive to its environment. The image of the marketplace focuses on the impact on the organisation of the introduction of competition and incentives in the post-reform period. Other images are sketched briefly. In the critical evaluation the insights generated by the different images are assessed and the different interpretations linked together. It is concluded that metaphoric thinking enables us to appreciate and interpret the ambiguities and paradoxes in NHS organisational life.

Economic Competition↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Factors that influence metaphor comprehension skills in adulthood.

We investigated differences between older and younger adults in interpreting metaphors describing emotions (e.g., "Joe was crashing thunder," meaning that he was angry). Subjects selected emotional interpretations and explained the basis of their selection for 12 metaphors. Twenty-four older and 24 younger adults read metaphors that described emotions. The group performed identically when selecting interpretations, but older adults were more likely to make up stories about the person named in the metaphor to explain the metaphor than were younger adults, who focused on attributes of the metaphoric terms. These findings suggest that observed adult age differences in metaphor comprehension reflect methodological factors and may reflect cognitive style differences.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

The developmental importance of motion information in perceiving and describing metaphoric similarity.

The perceptual basis of metaphor was investigated using films of natural objects and events. The subjects were 5-, 7-, and 10-year-old children and adults, 16 at each age. The stimuli were 10 triads of films, for example, a ballerina spinning, a top spinning, and a ballerina leaping. There were 3 possible pairs of scenes: the metaphoric (e.g., ballerina spinning, top spinning), the literal (e.g., ballerina spinning, ballerina leaping), and the control (e.g., ballerina leaping, top spinning). Half the triads were stationary objects, the other half moving objects (i.e., events). Subjects were asked to pair scenes and talk about them. The mean frequency of metaphoric pairings increased with age, literal pairings increased from ages 5 to 7, and control pairings were consistently infrequent. Event triads elicited more metaphoric pairings than object triads, and the frequency of event metaphoric pairings was equal to event literal pairings at a younger age. Figurative language increased in frequency from ages 5 to 10, and figurative words more often referred to action in the event than in the object triads. It was concluded that motion information made metaphoric similarity relatively easy to perceive and influenced the form of descriptive metaphors.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily: evidence from N400.

This study addresses a central question in perception of novel figurative language: whether it is interpreted intelligently and figuratively immediately, or only after a literal interpretation fails. Eighty sentence frames that could plausibly end with a literal, truly anomalous, or figurative word were created. After validation for meaningfulness and figurativeness, the 240 sentences were presented to 11 subjects for event related potential (ERP) recording. ERP's first 200 ms is believed to reflect the structuring of the input; the prominence of a dip at around 400 ms (N400) is said to relate inversely to how expected a word is. Results showed no difference between anomalous and metaphoric ERPs in the early window, metaphoric and literal ERPs converging 300-500 ms after the ending, and significant N400s only for anomalous endings. A follow-up study showed that the metaphoric endings were less frequent (in standardized word norms) than were the anomalous and literal endings and that there were significant differences in cloze probabilities (determined from 24 new subjects) among the three ending types: literal > metaphoric > anomalous. It is possible that the low frequency of the metaphoric element and lower cloze probability of the anomalous one contributed to the processes reflected in the early window, while the incongruity and near-zero cloze probability of the anomalous endings produced an N400 effect in them alone. The structure or parse derived for metaphor during the early window appears to yield a preliminary interpretation suggesting anomaly, while semantic analysis reflected in the later window renders a plausible figurative interpretation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences.

In this study, we used a novel cognitive paradigm and event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (ER-fMRI) to investigate the neural substrates involved in processing three different types of sentences. Participants read either metaphoric (Some surgeons are butchers), literal (Some surgeons are fathers), or non-meaningful sentences (Some surgeons are shelves) and had to decide whether they made sense or not. We demonstrate that processing of the different sentence types relied on distinct neural mechanisms. Activation of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), BA 47, was shared by both non-meaningful and metaphoric sentences but not by literal sentences. Furthermore, activation of the left thalamus appeared to be specifically involved in deriving meaning from metaphoric sentences despite lack of reaction times differences between literals and metaphors. We assign this to the ad hoc concept construction and open-endedness of metaphoric interpretation. In contrast to previous studies, our results do not support the view the right hemispheric is specifically involved in metaphor comprehension.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Metaphor explanation attenuates the right-hand preference for depictive co-speech gestures that imitate actions.

Differential activation levels of the two hemispheres due to hemispheric specialization for various linguistic processes might determine hand choice for co-speech gestures. To test this hypothesis, we compared hand choices for gesturing in 20 healthy right-handed participants during explanation of metaphorical vs. non-metaphorical meanings, on the assumption that metaphor explanation enhances the right hemisphere contribution to speech production. Hand choices were analyzed separately for: depictive gestures that imitate action ("character viewpoint gestures," [McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]), depictive gestures that express motion, relative locations, and shape ("observer viewpoint gestures"), and "abstract deictic gestures." It was found that the right-hand over left-hand preference was significantly weaker in the metaphor condition than in the non-metaphor conditions for depictive gestures that imitated action. Findings suggest that the activation of the right hemisphere in the metaphor condition reduces the likelihood of left hemisphere generation of gestures that imitate action, thus attenuating the right-hand preference.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Recognition of metaphor and irony in young adults: the impact of schizotypal personality traits.

Patients with schizophrenia demonstrate two dissociable impairments of pragmatic language comprehension: (1) an insensitivity to irony, which is associated with poor theory-of-mind (i.e. a difficulty with inferring other people's thoughts); and (2) poor recognition of metaphors, which may reflect degraded semantics. This study investigated whether non-clinical high-schizotypal adults show similar impairments of pragmatic language. Thirty-six university students completed the Raine Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire, the Wechsler Memory Scale Logical-Memories subtest, Raven's Progressive Matrices and a story comprehension task that tested the ability to discriminate between incongruous statements and appropriate uses of ironical, metaphorical or literal speech. Counter to the pattern found for patients, high-schizotypal adults were just as capable as low-schizotypal adults of identifying appropriate metaphors, suggesting a discontinuity between schizophrenia and schizotypy for the metaphor-recognition problem. This study's finding of intact metaphor recognition in high-schizotypal adults contrasts with previous findings of poor proverb comprehension in these individuals and is interpreted in terms of different semantic processes required for recognizing and interpreting metaphors. Consistent with the pattern found for patients, high-schizotypal adults were significantly impaired in their ability to appreciate when a literally contradictory utterance could be interpreted as ironical, suggesting continuity between schizophrenia and schizotypy for the irony-appreciation problem.

Adolescent↗