SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Mesothelin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between epithelioid mesotheliomas and squamous carcinomas of the lung: a comparative study.

As both mesotheliomas and squamous carcinomas can present a wide variety of morphological patterns, they can on occasion be confused. Recently, some groups of investigators have called attention to the difficulties that sometimes exist in distinguishing between these malignancies and the need to define a panel of markers that can assist in reaching the correct diagnosis. The aim of the present study is to compare the value of the various immunohistochemical markers currently available for the diagnosis of mesothelioma and squamous carcinoma of the lung. A total of 30 epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas exhibiting a solid or predominantly solid pattern, and 30 nonkeratinizing squamous carcinomas of the lung were investigated for the expression of the following markers: podoplanin, calretinin, mesothelin, WT1, keratin 5/6, keratin 7, p63, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), MOC-31, Ber-EP4, B72.3, BG-8 (Lewis(y)), leu-M1 (CD15), and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1). All 30 (100%) of the mesotheliomas reacted for calretinin, mesothelin and keratin 7, 93% each for podoplanin, WT1 and keratin 5/6, 13% for Ber-EP4, 7% each for p63, MOC-31 and BG-8, and 0% for B72.3, CEA, leu-M1 and TTF-1. All 30 (100%) of the squamous carcinomas were positive for p63 and keratin 5/6, 97% for MOC-31, 87% for Ber-EP4, 80% for BG-8, 77% for CEA, 57% for keratin 7, 40% for calretinin and B72.3, 30% for leu-M1, 27% for mesothelin, 15% for podoplanin, and 0% for WT 1 and TTF-1. After analyzing the results, it is concluded that from a practical point-of-view, a combination of two positive mesothelioma markers (WT1 and calretinin or mesothelin) with two negative mesothelioma markers (p63 and MOC-31) would allow the differential diagnosis to be established between epithelioid mesotheliomas and squamous carcinomas of the lung in nearly all instances.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2001

Generation of high titer antisera in rabbits by DNA immunization.

Mesothelin is a GPI-linked, membrane-associated differentiation antigen that is over-expressed in several forms of human cancers. Intradermal injection into rabbits of plasmid DNA encoding full length mesothelin resulted in antisera with titers as high as 1:100,000. Each immunization consisted of 320 microg of DNA delivered into 4 sites. After the initial three injections antisera titers were moderate (between 10 to 30,000) and fell over the course of about 7 weeks. When the titers had fallen, an injection of a booster dose of DNA resulted in very high titers of antisera. These antisera contained IgGs that could bind to both recombinant mesothelin made in Eschericha coli and to mesothelin present on human cells in Western blots and in immunofluorescence assays. These observations indicate that simple intradermal DNA immunization of rabbits can result in high titers of antibodies that can be used for a variety of purposes.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Ovarian atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors: gastrointestinal and seromucinous (endocervical-like) types are immunophenotypically distinctive.

Ovarian atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors of gastrointestinal and seromucinous types are considered subtypes within the mucinous tumor category despite the presence of distinctive clinicopathologic features that seromucinous tumors share with pure serous tumors. Immunophenotypic differences have not been extensively investigated. Immunohistochemical studies were performed to compare the expression patterns of cytokeratins 7 and 20 (CK7, CK 20), estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR), CA-125, mesothelin, and WT-1 in 28 tumors of gastrointestinal type and 12 tumors of seromucinous type. Both gastrointestinal and seromucinous type tumors had a high frequency of CK7 expression (93% and 100%, respectively). The gastrointestinal type tumors were characterized by frequent expression of CK20 (86%) and CDX2 (39%), infrequent expression of CA-125 (11%) and mesothelin (7%), and lack of expression of ER, PR, and WT-1. In contrast, the seromucinous type tumors were characterized by frequent expression of ER (100%), PR (67%), CA-125 (92%), and mesothelin (83%), infrequent expression of WT-1 (8%), and lack of expression of CK20 and CDX2. The gastrointestinal and seromucinous types of atypical proliferative mucinous tumors are immunophenotypically distinctive tumors. The former are characterized by expression of markers of gastrointestinal-type differentiation (CK20 and CDX2), whereas the latter are characterized by expression of "müllerian-type" markers (ER, PR, CA-125, and mesothelin). Expression of the latter markers in the seromucinous tumors, which also are expressed in pure serous tumors, and lack of expression of gastrointestinal-type markers, combined with the clinicopathologic features these tumors share with pure serous tumors, support the concept that this subtype is more closely related to serous than gastrointestinal type mucinous tumors and justify the designation "seromucinous."

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗

PubMed2006

Evaluation of 12 antibodies for distinguishing epithelioid mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma: identification of a three-antibody immunohistochemical panel with maximal sensitivity and specificity.

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of 10 monoclonal and two polyclonal antibodies for distinguishing epithelioid mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma (AdCA) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The antibodies were directed against the mesothelial-associated antigens mesothelin, calretinin, cytokeratin 5, thrombomodulin, Wilms' tumor-1 (WT-1) gene product and HBME-1, and the nonmesothelial antigens Lewis-Y blood group (antibody BG8), MOC-31, BerEp4, CD15, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family. The 133 tumors evaluated included 65 malignant epithelioid mesotheliomas, 22 lung AdCAs, 27 ovarian serous carcinomas, 24 breast carcinomas, and five gastric carcinomas. Diagnoses were based on clinical, histologic, ultrastructural, and/or IHC findings. Calretinin had the best sensitivity for mesothelioma (95%), followed by HBME-1 (84%), WT-1 (78%), cytokeratin 5 (76%), mesothelin (75%), and vimentin and thrombomodulin (68%). Thrombomodulin had the best specificity for mesothelioma (92%), followed by cytokeratin 5 (89%), calretinin (87%) vimentin (84%), and HBME-1 (45%). When ovarian carcinomas were excluded from the analysis, the specificity of mesothelin and WT-1 for the diagnosis of mesothelioma increased to 90 and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity of the nonmesothelial antigens for AdCA was organ dependent, with BG8 performing best in the breast cancer group (96%), and BerEp4, BG8, MOC-31 performing best in the lung cancer group (100%). The specificity of the nonmesothelial antigens for AdCA was 98% for BG8 and CEA, 97% for CD15, 95% for BerEp4, and 87% for MOC-31. A novel statistical analysis technique employing logic regression analysis identified a three-antibody immunohistochemical panel including calretinin, BG8, and MOC-31, which provided over 96% sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing epithelioid mesothelioma from AdCA.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Biomarkers in Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspirates.

This study was undertaken to determine whether recently identified proteins could be translated to clinical practice as markers to distinguish pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis on fine-needle aspirate (FNA) samples. Resected pancreatic tissue sections (n = 40) and FNA samples (n = 65) were stained for clusterin-beta, MUC4, survivin, and mesothelin. For each biomarker, the staining patterns in adenocarcinoma and in reactive ductal epithelium were evaluated and compared. Clusterin-beta stained reactive ductal epithelium significantly more frequently than pancreatic adenocarcinoma (P < .001). In comparison, MUC4 and mesothelin were expressed more frequently in pancreatic adenocarcinoma on tissue sections. Positive staining for MUC4 (91% vs 0%; P < .001) and mesothelin (62% vs 0%; P = .01) and absence of staining for clusterin-beta (90% vs 7%; P < .001) were noted significantly more frequently in adenocarcinoma cells than in reactive cells in FNA samples. Clusterin-beta and MUC4 can help distinguish reactive ductal epithelial cells from the cells of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in FNA samples.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Bivalent disulfide-stabilized fragment variable immunotoxin directed against mesotheliomas and ovarian cancer.

We have used protein engineering to generate a stable bivalent fragment variable (Fv) molecule from the antimesothelin antibody SS, in which the VH and VL domains of the Fv are linked to each other by a disulfide bond, and the two Fvs are connected by a flexible 15-amino acid (Gly4-Ser)3 linker. The SS (dsFv)2 molecule is fused to a M(r) 38,000 truncated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin to generate a bivalent, disulfide stabilized, (dsFv)2 immunotoxin. The immunotoxin was expressed in Escherichia coli, refolded in vitro, and purified to approximately 95% purity with a high yield of > 10%. Binding studies demonstrated that the (dsFv)2 molecule has 40 times higher apparent affinity for recombinant mesothelin than a monovalent dsFv molecule. The (dsFv)2 immunotoxin was 4-10-fold more cytotoxic to three mesothelin antigen-positive cell lines than the monovalent dsFv immunotoxin. However, when tested in mice bearing tumor cells expressing mesothelin, the antitumor activity of the bivalent immunotoxin is very similar to the activity of the lower affinity monovalent immunotoxin. Our data indicate that increasing affinity of an antibody fragment does not necessarily lead to higher antitumor activity of an immunotoxin in vivo.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗

PubMed2004

Analysis of novel tumor markers in pancreatic and biliary carcinomas using tissue microarrays.

Using global gene expression analyses, multiple novel tumor markers overexpressed in infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas have recently been identified. However, the expression of these markers in morphologically similar adenocarcinomas of the biliary tree has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was 3-fold. First, we used 8 markers that have been shown to be overexpressed in whole tissue sections of pancreatic adenocarcinomas to validate tissue microarrays (TMAs) created from a series of pancreatic adenocarcinomas (n=68). The labeling patterns of 6 epithelial markers (fascin, mucin 4, 14-3-3sigma, prostate stem cell antigen, topoisomerase IIalpha, and cdc2/p34) were concordant with previously published studies on whole tissue sections, yet required far fewer slides and reagents. Mesothelin, an epithelial marker, and heat shock protein 47, a marker of peritumoral desmoplasia, showed lower levels of expression in the TMAs when compared with whole tissue sections. Second, we examined the previously unknown expression of the same 8 novel tumor proteins in cancers of the biliary tree by using TMAs created from a series of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, gallbladder adenocarcinomas, and adenocarcinomas of the distal common bile duct (n=38). Each of the 8 markers was overexpressed in the biliary cancers, ranging from 14% demonstrating at least focal labeling with prostate stem cell antigen to 100% labeling with cdc2/p34. Most of the markers showed lower frequencies of expression in the biliary tract carcinomas in comparison to the pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In addition, expression patterns varied with location in the biliary system (intrahepatic versus gallbladder versus distal common bile duct). These differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) for mesothelin, mucin 4, and heat shock protein 47. Finally, the expression of selected markers in neoplastic progression of gallbladder cancer was examined. Two markers, fascin and mesothelin, showed up-regulation of expression with transition from carcinoma in situ to invasive adenocarcinoma, implicating a role for these markers in neoplastic progression. The results of this study indicate that TMA technology provides valid and cost-effective means to screen large numbers of novel tumor markers, even in tumors such as pancreatic and biliary adenocarcinomas that characteristically have abundant desmoplastic stroma. In addition, novel tumor markers of pancreatic adenocarcinomas show similar, yet not identical, expression patterns in biliary carcinomas. Therefore, these markers are potentially useful in developing diagnostic tests and treatment paradigms for tumors involving the biliary system.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2004

The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study.

Both mesotheliomas and renal cell carcinomas can present a wide variety of morphological patterns. Because of this, renal cell carcinomas that metastasize to the pleura and lung may be confused with mesotheliomas. The aim of the present study was to compare the value of the various immunohistochemical markers currently available for the diagnosis of mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma. A total of 48 mesotheliomas (40 epithelioid, 8 sarcomatoid), and 48 renal cell carcinomas (24 conventional, 12 chromophobe, 8 papillary, 4 sarcomatoid) were investigated for the expression of the following markers: calretinin, mesothelin, cytokeratin 5/6, WT1, thrombomodulin (TM), N-cadherin, CD15 (leu-M1), MOC-31, Ber-EP4, BG-8 (Lewis(y)), CD10, renal cell carcinoma marker (RCC Ma), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and B72.3. All (100%) of the epithelioid mesotheliomas reacted for calretinin, mesothelin, and cytokeratin 5/6; 93% for WT1; 78% for TM; 75% for N-cadherin, 48% for CD10, 15% for Ber-EP4, 8% for MOC-31, 8% for RCC Ma, 5% for BG-8, and none for CEA, B72.3, or CD15. Of the sarcomatoid mesotheliomas, 88% expressed calretinin, 75% N-cadherin, 38% CD10, and 13% each expressed cytokeratin 5/6, WT1, and TM. All of the remaining markers were negative. Among the RCCs, 81% expressed CD10, 75% N-cadherin, 63% CD15, 50% RCC Ma, 50% MOC-31, 42% Ber-EP4, 8% BG-8, and 2% TM. The remaining markers were negative. The results indicate that calretinin, mesothelin, and cytokeratin 5/6 are the best positive mesothelioma markers for differentiating epithelioid mesotheliomas from renal cell carcinomas. The best discriminators among the antibodies considered negative markers for mesothelioma are CD15, MOC-31, and RCC Ma. An accurate differential diagnosis can be reached with the use of any 2 of the 3 recommended positive markers, which should be selected based on availability and on which ones yield the best staining results in a given laboratory. One of the recommended negative markers may be added to the panel if deemed necessary. If confirmation of renal origin is needed, RCC Ma could be useful. Calretinin is the only marker that appears to have any utility in distinguishing between sarcomatoid mesotheliomas and sarcomatoid renal cell carcinomas.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2003

Expression of calretinin and other mesothelioma-related markers in thymic carcinoma and thymoma.

Thymic carcinoma and thymoma are primary neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum that can involve the lung and pleura in advanced stages or, in rare instances, occur as primary pleural tumors. Thus these tumors may be encountered in thoracic and pleural biopsy specimens. Recognizing the immunohistochemical patterns of calretinin and other mesothelioma-related markers in thymic carcinoma and thymoma may be helpful in avoiding confusion with malignant mesothelioma and pulmonary carcinoma, both of which are major differential diagnoses in this location. Accordingly, in the present study we examined the expression of calretinin, mesothelin, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, thrombomodulin, HBME-1, Wilms' tumor-1 (WT-1), Ber-EP4, MOC-31, BG-8, B72.3, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CD15, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), p63, and CD5 in 22 thymic carcinomas and 35 thymomas, and compared the results with those of malignant mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Around 1/3 of thymic carcinomas were positive for calretinin and/or mesothelin. Both thymic carcinomas and thymomas were frequently positive for CK 5/6. Immunoreactivity for HBME-1 was seen in 4 thymic carcinomas and 10 thymomas. Except for 1 thymic carcinoma being positive for WT-1, all other thymic carcinomas and thymomas were negative for WT-1 and thrombomodulin. None of the thymic carcinomas and thymomas expressed TTF-1. More than 70% of the thymic carcinomas were positive for Ber-EP4, BG-8, and CD15. The positive rates of MOC-31, B72.3, and CEA in thymic carcinomas were in the middle between those in mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma. All thymic epithelial tumors revealed nuclear immunoreactivity for p63. Nine thymic carcinomas (41%) expressed CD5. We found that a panel of positive p63, negative thrombomodulin, WT-1, and TTF-1 is most discriminatory for thymic epithelial tumors. Other mesothelial (calretinin and mesothelin) and epithelial (Ber-EP4, BG-8, and CD15) markers are less contributory in discerning thymic epithelial tumors due to their overlapping expression with malignant mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Given the complexity of the staining patterns among the different entities, proper immunohistochemical stainings should be selected and interpreted with caution, and correlated with clinicopathologic findings in the differential diagnoses of thoracic biopsy specimens.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2003

The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma: a comparative study of epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma.

A large number of immunohistochemical markers that can facilitate the distinction between epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas and pulmonary peripheral adenocarcinomas have recently become available. The aim of this study is to compare the value of these new markers with others that are already commonly used for this purpose and to determine which are, at present, the best for discriminating between these malignancies. Sixty epithelioid mesotheliomas and 50 lung adenocarcinomas were investigated for expression of the following markers: calretinin, cytokeratin 5/6, WT1, thrombomodulin, mesothelin, CD44S, HBME-1, N-cadherin, E-cadherin, MOC-31, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), BG-8 (Lewisy), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Ber-EP4, B72.3 (TAG-72), leu-M1 (CD15), CA19-9, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), and vimentin. All (100%) of the mesotheliomas reacted for calretinin, cytokeratin 5/6, and mesothelin, 93% for WT1, 93% for EMA, 85% for HBME-1, 77% for thrombomodulin; 73% for CD44S, 73% for N-cadherin, 55% for vimentin, 40% for E-cadherin, 18% for Ber-EP4, 8% for MOC-31, 7% for BG-8, and none for CEA, B72.3, leu-M1, TTF-1, or CA19-9. Of the adenocarcinomas, 100% were positive for MOC-31, Ber-EP4, and EMA, 96% for BG-8, 88% for CEA, 88% for E-cadherin, 84% for B72.3, 74% for TTF-1, 72% for leu-M1, 68% for HBME-1, 48% for CD44S, 48% for CA19-9, 38% for mesothelin, 38% for vimentin, 30% for N-cadherin, 14% for thrombomodulin, 8% for calretinin, 2% for cytokeratin 5/6, and none for WT1. After analyzing the results, it is concluded that calretinin, cytokeratin 5/6, and WT1 are the best positive markers for differentiating epithelioid malignant mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma. The best discriminators among the antibodies considered to be negative markers for mesothelioma are CEA, MOC-31, Ber-EP4, BG-8, and B72.3. A panel of four markers (two positive and two negative) selected based upon availability and which ones yield good staining results in a given laboratory is recommended. Because of their specificity and sensitivity for mesotheliomas, the best combination appears to be calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 (or WT1) for the positive markers and CEA and MOC-31 (or B72.3, Ber-EP4, or BG-8) for the negative markers. An extensive and detailed review of the literature is also provided.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Expression of novel markers of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms: additional evidence of different genetic pathways.

Solid pseudopapillary tumor, pancreatoblastoma, undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic-like giant cells, and acinar cell carcinomas are rare pancreatic nonductal neoplasms. Compared to the significant advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in the last decades, the molecular mechanisms underlying pancreatic nonductal neoplasms are poorly understood. In order to elucidate their molecular pathogenesis, we constructed tissue microarrays to study the expression of some novel pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-associated tumor markers in these nonductal pancreatic neoplasms. We analyzed nine markers including tumor suppressor gene (14-3-3 sigma), proliferation marker (topoisomerase II alpha), epithelial markers (prostate stem cell antigen, mesothelin and cytokeratin 19), stromal markers (fascin, hsp47 and fibronectin), and gamma-synuclein whose function is not delineated. In addition, we included tumor suppressor gene DPC4 and oncogene Beta-catenin to further confirm their expression in pancreatic nonductal tumors. Our results showed that in contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas that show loss of Dpc4 protein in 55% of cases, loss of Dpc4 expression is absent in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms. Expression of 14-3-3 sigma is frequently seen in both pancreatic nonductal neoplasms (25-100%) and ductal adenocarcinomas (89%). Aberrant nuclear expression of beta-catenin is common in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms, specifically in solid pseudopapillary tumors (88%) and pancreatoblastomas (100%) but is rarely seen in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (<5%). Expression of topoisomerase II alpha is not seen in solid pseudopapillary tumors and undifferentiated carcinomas with osteoclastic-like giant cells but is focally seen in pancreatoblastomas (50%) and acinar cell carcinomas (85%). Expression of PSCA and mesothelin was observed in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms but their expression was seen less frequently (0-50%) and weaker than that in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (60-100%). CK19, a marker of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, is not expressed in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms. Expression of gamma-synuclein as well as stromal markers (fascin, hsp47 and fibronectin) is frequently seen in both. Our findings indicate pancreatic nonductal neoplasms have distinctive patterns of protein expression relative to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and suggest that pancreatic nonductal neoplasms have different genetic pathways from the more common pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

14-3-3 Proteins↗

PubMed2003

Multicomponent analysis of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma progression model using a pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia tissue microarray.

A multistep model for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been proposed recently. In this model, well-defined, noninvasive ductal lesions are recognized as precursors of invasive cancer and have been classified under the nomenclature of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or PanIN. Increasing evidence suggests that PanINs represent true neoplasms of the pancreatic ductal epithelium, accumulating histologic and genetic abnormalities in their progression toward invasive cancer. We have constructed a tissue microarray containing 55 PanIN lesions of all histologic grades in order to perform a multicomponent analysis of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma progression model. The protein products of 14 genes encompassing a variety of functional classes, such as tumor suppressor genes (p53, Smad4/Dpc4), oncogenes (beta-catenin), cell cycle antigens (p16, cyclin D1), proliferation antigens (Ki-67, topoisomerase II alpha), and epithelial apomucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5), as well as "novel" genes described as differentially up-regulated in invasive pancreas cancer by global microarray expression analysis (mesothelin, prostate stem cell antigen, fascin, and 14-3-3varsigma), were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on the PanIN tissue microarray. Comparison of the results from the current study with previously published data performed on routine histologic sections of PanINs demonstrates that tissue microarrays are a valid platform for molecular analysis not only of invasive cancers but of precursor lesions as well. In addition, this study demonstrates that molecular abnormalities in PanINs are not random but can usually be stratified into "early" changes (e.g., expression of MUC5 and prostate stem antigen, or loss of p16), "intermediate" changes (e.g., expression of cyclin D1), and "late" changes (e.g., expression of p53, proliferation antigens, MUC1, mesothelin, and 14-3-3varsigma, or loss of Smad4/Dpc4). Understanding the molecular pathogenesis of precursor lesions of invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas using a high-throughput tissue microarray-based approach is a valuable adjunct to designing rational strategies for early detection of this lethal neoplasm.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2026

A modular γδ TCR-T platform combining KRAS pMHC targeting with re-dosable mRNA engager redirection.

Solid tumors often evade TCR-engineered αβ T cells when antigen expression varies or when the restricting Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) allele is lost. γδ T cells, in contrast, detect cellular dysregulation through non-peptide/Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) cues, including phosphoantigens and stress ligands, and can be developed as allogeneic therapies. Although intratumoral γδ T cell signatures are associated with improved outcome across cancers, γδ recognition itself is broad and still selected within the thymus just as αβ T cell receptors (TCRs) are. It does not, however, anchor specificity to a defined driver-mutation pMHC epitope. We therefore asked whether a high-affinity, co-receptor-independent αβ TCR could graft oncogenic-driver specificity onto γδ T cells while leaving the endogenous γδ TCR intact. We knocked the KRASG12V/HLA-A*11:01 TCR A11v into primary human γδ T cells. Engineered cells co-expressed the transgenic αβ TCR and the endogenous γδ TCR and lysed KRASG12V/HLA-A*11:01+ tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. To cover potential resistance through loss of HLA-A*11:01, we delivered an mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encoding a secreted mesothelin×CD3 (M5) bispecific T cell engager (TCE). LNP-M5 produced circulating TCE that redirected γδ A11v T cells and polyclonal bystander T cells to kill mesothelin+ targets, accompanied by development of higher γδ A11v T cell counts in vivo. In humanized mice bearing mixed HLA-A*11:01+ and HLA-A*11:01 - KRASG12V tumors, γδ A11v T cells produced transient control, whereas adding LNP-M5 yielded complete responses and prolonged survival. Thus, this two-part therapy couples invariant driver targeting to tunable redirection and addresses loss of the restricting HLA allele, a central escape route for TCR-based therapy. It provides an off-the-shelf reagent to enable KRAS-anchored treatment with the ability to redeliver the reagent.

Humans↗

PubMed1998

Improved stability and yield of a Fv-toxin fusion protein by computer design and protein engineering of the Fv.

The conversion of the anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody K1 to a single-chain Fv (scFv) that is fused to a truncated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE) results in a fusion protein (immunotoxin) that is unstable and refolds very inefficiently. We have devised a method that identifies candidate residues in the framework region of K1 Fv that, when mutated, improved the yield and stability of the protein. The method works by initially aligning the framework sequences of K1 VH and VL with those of other scFvs that are stable and give a good yield as immunotoxins. Then we assigned a character to each residue that indicates its state of exposure based on the known crystal structures of Fabs. This identifies residues that are not compatible with their environment in the folded state of the protein. Next we calculated the frequencies of different amino acids for each position of the Fvs based on the available sequence database. This identifies residues that are not commonly present in the conserved positions. If these residues are compatible with their exposure profile they are left unaltered. Otherwise, they are identified as candidate residues for mutation. We identified two such residues in the VH (T82 and A85) and two in the VL (H36 and V60) of K1 that did not seem appropriate for their respective positions. By mutating these residues in K1 into those that occur most commonly in the sequence database or in stable scFvs, we significantly improved the stability and yield of the K1 scFv immunotoxins. By making single and combined mutations we assessed the relative contribution of mutations at these four sites towards the stability and yield of K1 scFv immunotoxins. The method we devised is probably general and can be used to improve other scFvs.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2000

Structure of the Mesothelin/MPF gene and characterization of its promoter.

Mesothelin is a cell-surface antigen of unknown function that is expressed in a highly tissue-specific manner. Expression of the protein is limited to mesothelium, the tissue forming the pleural, pericardial, and peritoneal membranes. The purpose of this study was to characterize the gene and identify elements responsible for its transcription. The gene contains an 1884-bp open reading frame encoded by 15 exons occupying 8 kb of human chromosome 16. An 1850-bp region of genomic DNA at the 5' end of the gene encompassing the proposed transcriptional start site was cloned. This region lacks a TATA box and other regulatory elements such as SP1 sites, which are commonly found in promoters. Transient transfection analyses demonstrated that mesothelium-specific control elements are present within the 1.85-kb region. Minimal constitutive promoter elements were localized to a 317-bp region. Tissue-specific enhancer elements upstream of the minimal promoter were found to activate transcription from the homologous and a heterologous promoter in a position- and orientation-independent manner.

Blotting, Northern↗

PubMed2005

Gene overexpression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Pancreatic cancer is the deadliest of cancers, and effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are lacking. Global gene expression profiling holds promise for improved diagnosis and treatment. Knowledge of the location and timing of gene overexpression and the function of these genes, including their effects on signaling pathways, is important. These data may be used to develop histologic and serum biomarkers as well as to develop immunotherapeutic, molecular targeting, and gene therapy strategies. We have compiled a list of overexpressed genes in pancreatic cancer for which overexpression was confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and/or in situ hybridization following initial identification by global gene expression profiling. The techniques used in the determination of overexpression, problems encountered in global gene expression profiling, and the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of overexpression are discussed. The S100 gene family, mesothelin, prostate stem cell antigen, and 14-3-3 sigma, may have important clinical implications in pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment.

14-3-3 Proteins↗

PubMed2004

Combining CA 125 and SMR serum markers for diagnosis and early detection of ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The serum tumor marker CA 125 is elevated in most clinically advanced ovarian carcinomas. Because these elevations may precede clinical detection by a year or more, CA 125 is potentially useful for early detection as part of an ovarian cancer screening program. However, CA 125 is often not elevated in clinically detected cancer and is frequently elevated in women with benign ovarian tumors. CA 125 may be more useful in conjunction with one or more other tumor biomarkers. Additional markers could play a role if, when used with CA 125, they identify some carcinomas missed by CA 125 (i.e., they improve sensitivity), rule out false positives (i.e., improve specificity), or are able to detect the same cancers earlier. METHODS: We have evaluated a composite marker (CM) that combines CA 125 and a previously described soluble mesothelin related (SMR) marker in sera from 52 ovarian cancer cases, 43 controls with benign ovarian tumors, and 220 normal risk controls who participated in a screening program, including 25 healthy women having two serum samples collected 1 year apart. CA 125, SMR, and CM were evaluated for their ability to identify clinical disease and for their temporal stability, which assesses their ability to obtain even greater sensitivity when used in a longitudinal screening program. RESULTS: CM has the best sensitivity, with specificity equal to CA 125. Importantly, CM has temporal stability at least as high as CA 125. CONCLUSION: The CM may outperform CA 125 alone in a longitudinal screening program as well as in a diagnostic setting.

CA-125 Antigen↗

PubMed2005

Potential markers that complement expression of CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: When ovarian carcinoma is diagnosed in stage I, up to 90% of patients can be cured with surgery and currently available chemotherapy. At present, less than 25% of cases are diagnosed at this stage. To increase the fraction of ovarian cancers detected at an early stage, screening strategies have been devised that utilize a rising serum CA125 level to trigger the performance of transvaginal sonography. One limitation of CA125 as an initial step in such a screening strategy is that up to 20% of ovarian cancers lack expression of the antigen. Serum tumor markers that can be detected in ovarian cancers that lack CA125 expression might improve the sensitivity for early detection. METHODS: From 296 ovarian cancers, 65 (22%) were found to have weak or absent CA125 expression on immunoperoxidase staining. Tissue expression of CA125 was compared to serum CA125 levels. Using immunoperoxidase staining of tissue arrays, we have assessed expression of 10 potential serum tumor markers in the 65 epithelial ovarian cancers with little or no CA125 expression and in ovarian cystadenomas, tumors of low malignant potential, normal ovaries, and 16 other normal tissues. RESULTS: Low or absent expression of CA125 in surgical specimens of epithelial ovarian cancer was associated with low levels of serum CA125 in pre-operative serum specimens. In ovarian cancers that lacked CA125, all specimens (100%) expressed human kallikrein 10 (HK10), human kallikrein 6 (HK6), osteopontin (OPN), and claudin 3. A smaller fraction of CA125-deficient ovarian cancers expressed DF3 (95%), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (81%), MUC1 (62%), mesothelin (MES) (34%), HE4 (32%), and CA19-9 (29%). When reactivity with normal tissues was considered, however, MES and HE4 showed the greatest specificity. Differential expression was also found for HK10, OPN, DF3, and MUC1. CONCLUSIONS: At the level of tissue expression, each of 10 potential serum markers could be detected in 29-100% of ovarian cancers that had low or absent expression of CA125. Several markers exhibited more intense expression in cancers than in normal organs. Further investigation is needed to demonstrate complementary expression of markers in serum.

Antigens↗