Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MLH1”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Contribution of human mlh1 and pms2 ATPase activities to DNA mismatch repair.

MutLalpha, a heterodimer composed of Mlh1 and Pms2, is the major MutL activity in mammalian DNA mismatch repair. Highly conserved motifs in the N termini of both subunits predict that the protein is an ATPase. To study the significance of these motifs to mismatch repair, we have expressed in insect cells wild type human MutLalpha and forms altered in conserved glutamic acid residues, predicted to catalyze ATP hydrolysis of Mlh1, Pms2, or both. Using an in vitro assay, we showed that MutLalpha proteins altered in either glutamic acid residue were each partially defective in mismatch repair, whereas the double mutant showed no detectable mismatch repair. Neither strand specificity nor directionality of repair was affected in the single mutant proteins. Limited proteolysis studies of MutLalpha demonstrated that both Mlh1 and Pms2 N-terminal domains undergo ATP-induced conformational changes, but the extent of the conformational change for Mlh1 was more apparent than for Pms2. Furthermore, Mlh1 was protected at lower ATP concentrations than Pms2, suggesting Mlh1 binds ATP with higher affinity. These findings imply that ATP hydrolysis is required for MutLalpha activity in mismatch repair and that this activity is associated with differential conformational changes in Mlh1 and Pms2.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Loss of DNA mismatch repair proteins in skin tumors from patients with Muir-Torre syndrome and MSH2 or MLH1 germline mutations: establishment of immunohistochemical analysis as a screening test.

Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) is a rare autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by the predisposition to both sebaceous skin tumors (or multiple keratoacanthomas) and internal malignancies. A subtype of MTS is allelic to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and is caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 or MLH1. In these cases both internal and skin tumors show characteristic microsatellite instability (MSI). The aim of the present study was to determine whether immunohistochemical examination of MSH2 or MLH1 protein expression in MTS-associated skin tumors can be used as a diagnostic screening tool to identify patients with germline mutations in MSH2 or MLH1. In the present study 28 skin lesions from 17 patients (20 sebaceous gland tumors, 4 sebaceous hyperplasias, 3 keratoacanthomas, and 1 squamous cell carcinoma) were tested immunohistochemically with antibodies against MSH2 and MLH1. Eighteen of these tumors were from eight patients with known MSH2 germline mutations, two tumors were from a patient with a germline mutation in MLH1, and eight microsatellite stable sporadic skin tumors served as controls. One sample had to be excluded because of a lack of immunoreactivity. All eight microsatellite stable tumors expressed both DNA repair proteins. In 15 of the tumors from MSH2 germline mutation carriers, loss of MSH2 expression was observed, one tumor showed reduced MSH2 expression, and one tumor displayed positive immunoreactivity to MSH2. Both tumors of the MLH1 germline mutation carrier showed loss of the MLH1 protein. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that immunohistochemical testing of MTS-related skin tumors is a reliable screening method with high predictive value for the diagnosis of the DNA mismatch repair-deficient MTS.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Dual requirement in yeast DNA mismatch repair for MLH1 and PMS1, two homologs of the bacterial mutL gene.

We have identified a new Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene, MLH1 (mutL homolog), that encodes a predicted protein product with sequence similarity to DNA mismatch repair proteins of bacteria (MutL and HexB) and S. cerevisiae yeast (PMS1). Disruption of the MLH1 gene results in elevated spontaneous mutation rates during vegetative growth as measured by forward mutation to canavanine resistance and reversion of the hom3-10 allele. Additionally, the mlh1 delta mutant displays a dramatic increase in the instability of simple sequence repeats, i.e., (GT)n (M. Strand, T. A. Prolla, R. M. Liskay, and T. D. Petes, Nature [London] 365:274-276, 1993). Meiotic studies indicate that disruption of the MLH1 gene in diploid strains causes increased spore lethality, presumably due to the accumulation of recessive lethal mutations, and increased postmeiotic segregation at each of four loci, the latter being indicative of inefficient repair of heteroduplex DNA generated during genetic recombination. mlh1 delta mutants, which should represent the null phenotype, show the same mutator and meiotic phenotypes as isogenic pms1 delta mutants. Interestingly, mutator and meiotic phenotypes of the mlh1 delta pms1 delta double mutant are indistinguishable from those of the mlh1 delta and pms1 delta single mutants. On the basis of our data, we suggest that in contrast to Escherichia coli, there are two MutL/HexB-like proteins in S. cerevisiae and that each is a required component of the same DNA mismatch repair pathway.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Systematic mutagenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH1 gene reveals distinct roles for Mlh1p in meiotic crossing over and in vegetative and meiotic mismatch repair.

In eukaryotic cells, DNA mismatch repair is initiated by a conserved family of MutS (Msh) and MutL (Mlh) homolog proteins. Mlh1 is unique among Mlh proteins because it is required in mismatch repair and for wild-type levels of crossing over during meiosis. In this study, 60 new alleles of MLH1 were examined for defects in vegetative and meiotic mismatch repair as well as in meiotic crossing over. Four alleles predicted to disrupt the Mlh1p ATPase activity conferred defects in all functions assayed. Three mutations, mlh1-2, -29, and -31, caused defects in mismatch repair during vegetative growth but allowed nearly wild-type levels of meiotic crossing over and spore viability. Surprisingly, these mutants did not accumulate high levels of postmeiotic segregation at the ARG4 recombination hotspot. In biochemical assays, Pms1p failed to copurify with mlh1-2, and two-hybrid studies indicated that this allele did not interact with Pms1p and Mlh3p but maintained wild-type interactions with Exo1p and Sgs1p. mlh1-29 and mlh1-31 did not alter the ability of Mlh1p-Pms1p to form a ternary complex with a mismatch substrate and Msh2p-Msh6p, suggesting that the region mutated in these alleles could be responsible for signaling events that take place after ternary complex formation. These results indicate that mismatches formed during genetic recombination are processed differently than during replication and that, compared to mismatch repair functions, the meiotic crossing-over role of MLH1 appears to be more resistant to mutagenesis, perhaps indicating a structural role for Mlh1p during crossing over.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

A human cell-based assay to evaluate the effects of alterations in the MLH1 mismatch repair gene.

We describe a new approach to investigate alterations in the human MLH1 mismatch repair (MMR) gene. This is based on complementation of the phenotype of a MLH1-defective subclone of the ovarian carcinoma A2780 cells by transfection of vectors encoding altered MLH1 proteins. Measurements of resistance (tolerance) to methylating agents, mutation rate at HPRT, microsatellite instability (MSI), and steady-state levels of DNA 8-oxoguanine were used to define the MMR status of transfected clones. The approach was validated by transfecting cDNA of wild-type (WT) MLH1, cDNAs bearing two previously identified polymorphisms (I219V and I219L) and two with confirmed hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome mutations (G224D and G67R). A low-level expression of two MLH1 polymorphisms partially reversed methylation tolerance and the mutator phenotype, including MSI. Higher levels of I219V resulted in full restoration of these properties to WT. Increased expression of I129L did not fully complement the MLH1 defect, because there was a simultaneous escalation in the level of oxidative DNA damage. The findings confirmed the important relationship between deficient MMR and increased levels of oxidative DNA damage. Mutations from Italian HNPCC families (G224D, G67R, N635S, and K618A) were all ineffective at reversing the phenotype of the MLH1-defective A2780 cells. One (K618A) was identified as a low penetrance mutation based on clinical and genetic observations.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Increased risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-associated synchronous and metachronous malignancies in patients with microsatellite instability-positive endometrial carcinoma lacking MLH1 promoter methylation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate number and types of synchronous and metachronous malignancies in patients with endometrial carcinoma with and without microsatellite instability (MSI). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From a series of 413 endometrial cancer patients, we identified 94 patients with MSI-positive (MSI+) cancers and grouped them by tumor MLH1 promoter methylation status. These 94 patients were matched by year of surgery to 94 patients with MSI-negative (MSI-) endometrial cancers from the same series. Medical records were reviewed for clinicopathologic information including rates and types of synchronous and metachronous malignancies. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-associated second and third cancers were analyzed for MSI and MSH2, MSH6, and MLH1 expression for comparison with the corresponding endometrial cancers. RESULTS: The MSI+ and MSI- cohorts were similar with regard to age, race, grade, and histology. Twenty-eight MSI+ endometrial cancers (29.8%) were MLH1 unmethylated. Rates of synchronous and metachronous cancers were also similar in the MSI+ and MSI- groups at 20 and 23%, respectively. However, patients with MSI+ MLH1 unmethylated endometrial cancers had an excess of HNPCC-associated second and third cancers compared with those with MSI+ MLH1 methylated and MSI- endometrial cancers (18% versus 4.5%, P = 0.034, and 2.1%, P = 0.002). Six of seven second tumors from 5 patients with MSI+ MLH1 unmethylated endometrial cancers showed concordant MSI and mismatch repair protein expression status. CONCLUSIONS: Our observation that patients with MSI-positive MLH1 unmethylated endometrial carcinoma are at increased risk for HNPCC-associated synchronous and metachronous malignancies suggests inherited cancer susceptibility. These patients and their families may warrant more intense cancer surveillance.

Age of Onset↗

Microsatellite instability and MLH1 promoter methylation in human retinoblastoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the link between microsatellite instability and epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 gene in the human retinoblastoma genome. METHODS: Methylation at the 5' region of MLH1 was studied, along with its protein expression level by using immunohistochemical staining in 51 retinoblastoma tumors and 2 retinoblastoma cell lines. Also assessed was the genomic stability of 26 retinoblastoma DNAs from microdissected tumor tissue and matched normal retina tissue obtained from the same patient by microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis. The National Cancer Institute-designed reference panel, and 85 markers on chromosomes 1, 6, 9, and 13 were used. RESULTS: Hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter was detected in the WERI-Rb1 cell line and in 34 (67%) of the 51 tumors, but not in cell line Y79 and the other 17 tumors. MLH1 hypermethylation was associated with null MLH1 protein expression (P < 0.0005) and with well-differentiated histology (P < 0.05). MSI at three markers (D2S123, D6S470, and D13S265) was frequently identified among 26 retinoblastoma specimens with matched normal DNA. Among these 26 retinoblastomas, high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) tumors were detected in 19% (5/26) and low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) in another 19% (5/26). The remaining 62% (15/26) were genetically stable (MSS). MSI status (MSS, MSI-L, and MSI-H) was not associated with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (P = 0.088; Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: Epigenetic silencing of the DNA repair gene MLH1 by promoter hypermethylation is a frequent event in retinoblastoma. The results showed that somatic genetic changes involving MSI occur in a subset of retinoblastoma and implicated the presence of a defective DNA mismatch repair pathway resulting in MSI in retinoblastoma.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Tumorigenesis in Mlh1 and Mlh1/Apc1638N mutant mice.

An3 1 KAL I MutL homologue 1 (MLH1) is a member of the family of proteins required for DNA mismatch repair. Germ-line mutations in MLH1 lead to the cancer susceptibility syndrome hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). We generated mice carrying a null mutation in the Mlh1 gene. We showed that mice heterozygous and homozygous for the Mlh1 gene are predisposed to developing tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, lymphomas, and a number of other tumor types. We also examined the role of adenomatous polyposis coli gene (Apc) gene mutations in the GI tumors of Mlh1 mutant mice by different methods and showed that the GI tumors in Mlh1 mice express little or no adenomatous polyposis coli protein. When an Apc gene mutation was bred into the Mlh1 mutant mice, the GI tumor incidence increased 40-100-fold. The wild-type Apc allele in these tumors was found to contain mutations. Together, these results show that we have developed two mouse models for human HNPCC and that the mechanisms of tumor development in the GI tract of these mice involve loss of Apc gene function in a manner very similar to that seen in the GI tumors of HNPCC.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Correlation among loss of heterozygosity, promoter methylation and protein expression of MLH1 in larynx cancer.

Extensive molecular studies in development of the squamous cell carcinoma of larynx (SCCL) indicated the involvement of a variety of genes including the MLH1. To search for possible mechanism leading to MLH1 silencing in SCCL we studied LOH and promoter methylation in a homogeneous set of 62 larynx cancers. Then we evaluated immunohistochemically the MLH1 expression for 51 tumor specimens. Further, the results were correlated with microsatellite instability and subsequently with the clinical course of the disease. LOH at the MLH1 locus and aberrant methylation of its promoter were found in 47.9 and in 22.6% of tumors, respectively. A decreased expression was observed in 27.5% of the cases. MSI analysis of tumor DNA showed a microsatellite stable phenotype in 59 cases (95.2%). From our study it can be concluded that: i) molecular alterations of MLH1 play an important role in SSCL development, ii) both LOH and aberrant methylation contribute to the MLH1 inactivation in SCCL and are associated with a less advanced stage of differentiation of larynx tumors, iii) MLH1 inactivation does not lead to MSI in larynx cancer and MSI may not contribute to the development of SCCL.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Methylation of the MLH1 gene in hematological malignancies.

Hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene has been described in many kinds of human cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI). However, it is not clear whether the same mechanism occurs in hematological malignancies. Genomic DNA was extracted from 31 patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL), 9 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who had MSI, and 12 leukemia and lymphoma cell lines with MSI. Aberrant methylation of the MLH1 gene was found in 2/31 (6%) ATL patients, and in 1/12 (8%) cell lines with MSI. MLH1 promoter was not methylated in either of the twelve peripheral blood samples from normal individuals or ALL samples. The MLH1 gene was expressed in the normal peripheral blood samples, but not in the MLH1-methylated cell line KCL22. Demethylation with 5-Azacytidine treatment restored MLH1 expression in the KCL22 cell line. Methylation of the MSH2 gene was not found in any of the samples. Our data show that hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene is occasionally involved in the pathogenesis of hematological malignancies, but is not always associated with MSI.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Exonic deletions of mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 correlate with prognosis and protein expression levels in malignant melanomas.

The mutations of MLH1 and MSH2 have been reported to be responsible for malignant transformation and tumour progression in several sporadic tumours. Eighty-six primary malignant melanomas with known follow-up were investigated. Point mutations of DNA mismatch repair MLH1 and MSH2 in malignant melanomas were not found. Exon 12 (MSH2) was not present in 26 out of the 86 melanomas and exon 13 (MSH2) was lost in 25 of the tumours. The loss of exon 15 (MLH1) was observed in 22 out of the 86 tumours and the loss of exon 16 (MLH1) in 24 melanomas. The loss of exons correlated strongly with the loss of MLH1 and MSH2 protein expression. In multivariate analysis, including all 4 exons and expressions of MLH1 and MSH2, prognostic significance was found only for loss of exon 12 (MSH2) and loss of exon 15 (MLH1).

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Mutations in MLH1 are more frequent than in MSH2 in sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.

The microsatellite instability that is a feature of tumors in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a consequence of defective DNA mismatch repair. Mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MLH1 may account for up to 90% of HNPCC kindreds. Microsatellite instability is also seen in 10-16% of sporadic colorectal cancers. A limited number of MSH2 and MLH1 mutations have been described for sporadic colorectal cancers. In this study, we screened 12 primary sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability for mutations in MSH2 and MLH1 by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and single-strand-conformation-variant (SSCV) analysis. Eight mutations were identified in six tumors. One mutation in MLH1 was found to be present in the patient's germline DNA. Four tumors had somatic mutations in MLH1, and, in two of these tumors, two different mutations were identified. A single tumor had a somatic MSH2 mutation. Our observations suggest that MLH1 is mutated more frequently than MSH2 in sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Mutational analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 in 25 prospectively-acquired RER+ endometrial cancers.

Mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1 and MSH2 have been linked to several human cancers which display the replication error (RER) phenotype. Germline mutations in these two genes have been implicated in about 90% of families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). A significant proportion of endometrial cancers, the second most common malignancy of the HNPCC syndrome, also exhibit RER. We screened 125 primary endometrial adenocarcinomas with seven microsatellite markers and identified 25 specimens with RER (20%). We used single-strand conformation variant analysis to search for mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Direct sequencing of variants revealed only one germline mutation in MLH1 and a single somatic mutation in MSH2. However, six previously unreported sequence polymorphisms in MLH1 were identified. Four of these polymorphisms show clear population-based differences in allele frequency. In addition, a highly informative marker for MLH1 was characterized. The low frequency of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 in this large series of cancers suggests that other MMR genes are responsible for the RER phenotype in endometrial cancers.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Clinicopathologic and familial characteristics of endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas in relation to the loss of protein expression of MSH2 and MLH1.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of synchronous or metachronous multiple primary carcinomas in patients with endometrial carcinoma has been reported to be between 10% and 23% and is highest among all gynecologic carcinomas. However, clinical characteristics and underlying genetic abnormalities in endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas has not been well clarified. Endometrial carcinoma is the most commonly associated extracolonic malignancy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma in which germ line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, particularly in MSH2 and MLH1, are known to cause this syndrome. The purpose of the current study was to investigate clinicopathologic and familial characteristics including MSH2, MLH1, and p53 expression in endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas, by comparing them to endometrial carcinoma without other primary malignancies. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: 30 patients with synchronous or metachronous multiple primary carcinomas other than endometrial carcinoma and 116 patients with endometrial carcinoma without other primary malignancies. Clinicopathologic characteristics, family history of cancer, and immunohistochemical protein expression of MSH2, MLH1, and p53 expression were investigated in both groups, and 15 endometria from benign disease were used for normal controls in immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The frequency of high risk clinicopathologic factors of endometrial carcinoma and 5-year survival rates and the frequency of p53 overexpression were not statistically different between the two groups. However, the loss of MSH2 and/or MLH1 expression was significant in endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas, when compared with endometrial carcinoma alone (22 of 30 vs. 31 of 116). In cases with multiple primary carcinomas, particularly those diagnosed before the patient was 55 years of age or those in which the patient had a family history of cancer, the frequency of this loss was especially high (11 of 13 and 10 of 11, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical or biologic nature of endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas seems to be similar to endometrial carcinoma alone. A high incidence of defective MSH2 and MLH1 protein in endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas, however, suggests that abnormalities in the function of MSH2 and MLH1 may play an important role in tumorigenesis for patients with endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas and their families.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Microsatellite instability and expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in carcinomas of the small intestine.

BACKGROUND: Carcinomas of the small intestine are rare, but the risk is greatly increased in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) due to an inherited mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation, most commonly affecting the genes MLH1 or MSH2. Defective MMR is characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of MMR protein expression in the tumor tissue. However, a subset of several sporadic tumor types, including about 15% of colon cancers, also evolve through defective MMR. METHODS: The authors have assessed the frequency of MSI and analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in a population-based series of 89 adenocarcinomas of the small intestine. To study the contribution of MSI and defective MMR protein expression in young patients, 43 cancers of the small intestine from patients below age 60 years (including 24 tumors from the population-based series and an additional 19 tumors from young individuals) were also analyzed. RESULTS: MSI was detected in 16/89 tumors (18%) in the population-based series, and immunohistochemistry revealed loss of expression for MLH1 in 7/16 MSI tumors and in 2/73 MSS tumors, whereas all tumors showed normal expression for MSH2. Among the young patients, the authors identified MSI in 10/43 tumors (23%), and 6 of these 10 MSI tumors showed immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression, which affected MLH1 in 3 cases and MSH2 in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of MSI (18%) in adenocarcinomas of the small intestine equals that of colon cancer. However, silencing of MLH1 seems to explain the MSI status in only about half of the MSI tumors. Among patients with cancer of the small intestine before age 60 years, MSI is found in 23% of the cases, with MLH1 and MSH2 being affected at equal frequencies, indicating that HNPCC may underly a subset of such cases.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Methylation profile of the MLH1 promoter region and their relationship to colorectal carcinogenesis.

Methylation of the MLH1 promoter region has been suggested to be a principal mechanism of gene inactivation in sporadic microsatellite instability (MSI)-positive colorectal carcinoma. Recently, we have shown a novel methylation profile of the MLH1 promoter region (i.e., full, partial, and no methylation), among which full methylation was strongly associated with MSI. In this study, to confirm whether methylation requires the involvement of both alleles, we studied the MLH1 promoter region concerning the methylation profile and allelic loss. Furthermore, we studied correlations of methylation profiles with genetic alternations such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the TP53 locus and KRAS mutation. Eighty-eight tumors were classified as full (n = 14), partial (n = 26), and no methylation (n = 48). Full methylation was observed in 78% (14/18) of high-frequency MSI, in which all CpG sites in the promoter region were methylated. Full methylation differed significantly from partial methylation regarding absence of TP53 LOH (0/12) and KRAS mutation (0/14). In cases with full methylation, we could show biallelic methylation by use of a single-base nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter. However, this did not accompany LOH of the MLH1 locus. In contrast, there were no significant differences in molecular features between partial and no methylation, except for low frequencies of LOH of the MLH1 locus (P = 0.02). In conclusion, biallelic extensive methylation of the MLH1 promoter region plays a significant role in gene inactivation and is independent of KRAS mutation and TP53 LOH.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Seven novel MLH1 and MSH2 germline mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most frequent hereditary form of colorectal cancer and is caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The majority of mutations occur in MLH1 and MSH2. We report hereby seven novel germline mutations in these two genes (five in MLH1 and two in MSH2). All mutations have been found in families fulfilling criteria of the Bethesda guidelines and four of which also fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria. We identified three insertions or deletions of 1 bp leading to premature stop codons (MLH1: c.341delC, c.1413-1414insA; MSH2: c.1119delG) and three nonsense mutations (MLH1: c.67G>T [E23X], c.436C>T [Q146X]; MSH2: c.1857T>G [Y619X]). The corresponding tumors showed a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and a complete loss of expression of the affected protein. In addition, a missense mutation in MLH1 was identified (c.1984A>C [T662P]). The respective tumor also showed a high level of microsatellite instability but a reduced, rather then lost, expression of the MLH1-protein. This missense mutation was not found in 107 healthy control individuals and in 54 HNPCC patients.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

MSI in endometrial carcinoma: absence of MLH1 promoter methylation is associated with increased familial risk for cancers.

Loss of DNA mismatch repair occurs in a variety of malignancies and is associated with genome-wide instability of microsatellite repeats, a molecular phenotype referred to as microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI is a consistent feature of colorectal and endometrial tumors from patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Sporadic colorectal and endometrial cancers that exhibit MSI frequently have methylation of the MLH1 promoter. We undertook a detailed family and medical history study to compare family cancer risk for women with MSI-positive and -negative endometrial cancers. The MLH1 promoter methylation status was determined for all cancers. Family histories were developed for 80 probands (40 with MSI-positive and 40 with MSI-negative tumors). The numbers of reported cancers in first- and second-degree relatives of the 2 groups were similar. There was a modest increase in familial cancer clustering for MSI-positive probands. When MSI-positive tumors were subclassified according to MLH1 promoter methylation, a clear association between methylation status and familial cancer risk was evident. Women with MSI-positive endometrial cancers in which the MLH1 promoter was unmethylated had a 7-fold relative risk (RR) of demonstrating familial clustering of cancers [RR 7.07 (95% confidence interval 2.29-21.81)]. The women with MSI-positive, MLH1-unmethylated tumors were significantly younger than the rest of the study population (56.1 years vs. 65.4, p < or = 0.01). Age of onset and tumor MSI not associated with MLH1 promoter methylation may point to women with a genetic susceptibility to malignancies.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗