Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lopinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Prevalence of the HIV-1 protease mutation I47A in clinical practice and association with lopinavir resistance.

Mutation proI47A has recently been associated with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) resistance. Only four out of 1859 specimens (0.2%) sent for drug resistance testing (219 drug-naive and 1650 antiretroviral-experienced) showed I47A. All belonged to patients failing LPV/r. The prevalence among protease inhibitor-experienced patients was 0.6%. Phenotypic testing showed that proI47A caused high-level lopinavir resistance (> 100-fold) and cross-resistance to amprenavir, whereas it caused hypersusceptibility to saquinavir. ProI47A should thus be considered the primary lopinavir resistance mutation.

Carbamates↗
PubMed2006

Reduced lopinavir exposure during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Optimal antiretroviral exposure during pregnancy is critical for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission and for maternal health. Pregnancy can alter antiretroviral pharmacokinetics. Our objective was to describe lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) pharmacokinetics during pregnancy. METHODS: We performed intensive steady-state 12-h pharmacokinetic profiles of lopinavir and ritonavir (three capsules: LPV 400 mg/r 100 mg) at 30-36 weeks gestation and 6-12 weeks postpartum. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples were obtained at delivery. We measured LPV and ritonavir by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Target LPV area under concentration versus time curve (AUC) was > or = 52 microg h/ml, the estimated 10th percentile LPV AUC in non-pregnant historical controls (mean AUC = 83 microg h/ml). RESULTS: Seventeen women completed antepartum evaluations; average gestational age was 35 weeks. Geometric mean antepartum LPV AUC was 44.4 microg h/ml [90% confidence interval (CI), 38.7-50.9] and 12-h post-dose concentration (C12h) was 1.6 microg/ml (90% CI, 1.1-2.5). Twelve women completed postpartum evaluations; geometric mean LPV AUC was 65.2 microg h/ml (90% CI, 49.7-85.4) and C12h was 4.6 microg/ml (90% CI, 3.7-5.7). The geometric mean ratio of antepartum/postpartum LPV AUC was 0.72 (90% CI, 0.54-0.96). Fourteen of 17 (82%) pregnant and three of 12 (25%) postpartum women did not meet our target LPV AUC. The ratio of cord blood/maternal LPV concentration in ten paired detectable samples was 0.2 +/- 0.13. CONCLUSIONS: LPV/r exposure during late pregnancy was lower compared to postpartum and compared to non-pregnant historical controls. Small amounts of lopinavir cross the placenta. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and effectiveness of increased LPV/r dosing during the third trimester of pregnancy should be investigated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2007

Salvage therapy with amprenavir, lopinavir and ritonavir is durably potent in HIV-infected patients in virological failure: 1-year results.

We report the results of the extended follow-up at one year of a randomized trial evaluating the virological efficacy of a salvage therapy combining lopinavir and amprenavir with either 200 or 400 mg/day ritonavir, along with optimized nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in patients carrying multidrug-resistant isolates. The combination of amprenavir, lopinavir and ritonavir (400 mg/day) is durably potent, yielding a sustained virological response (HIV RNA < 50 copies) in 39% of cases.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2006

Long-term treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir induces a reduction in peripheral adipose depots in mice.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients is associated with adverse effects, such as lipodystrophy and hyperlipidemia. The lipodystrophic syndrome is characterized by a peripheral lipoatrophy and/or fat accumulation in the abdomen and neck. In order to get insights into the physiopathological mechanisms underlying this syndrome, we treated mice with protease inhibitors (PIs) over a long period of time. Although atazanavir-treated mice presented the same circulating triglyceride concentration as control mice, lopinavir-ritonavir-treated mice rapidly became hypertriglyceridemic, with triglyceride levels of 200 mg/dl, whereas control and atazanavir-treated animals had triglyceride levels of 80 mg/dl. These results obtained with mice reproduce the metabolic disorder observed in humans. White adipose tissue (WAT) was analyzed after 8 weeks of treatment. Compared to the control or atazanavir treatment, lopinavir-ritonavir treatment induced a significant 25% weight reduction in the peripheral inguinal WAT depot. By contrast, the profound epididymal WAT depot was not affected. This effect was associated with a 5.5-fold increase in SREBP-1c gene expression only in the inguinal depot. Our results demonstrate that the long-term treatment of mice with PIs constitutes an interesting experimental model with which some aspects of the lipoatrophy induced by HAART in humans may be studied.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2003

In vitro hypersusceptibility of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C protease to lopinavir.

In order to characterize the impact of genetic polymorphisms on the susceptibility of subtype C strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to protease inhibitors (PIs), a subtype B protease that originated from an infectious clone was modified through site-directed mutagenesis to include the amino acid residue signatures of subtype C viruses (I15V, M36I, R41K, H69K, L89 M) with (clone C6) or without (clone C5) an I93L polymorphism present as a molecular signature of the worldwide subtype C protease. Their susceptibilities to commercially available PIs were measured by a recombinant virus phenotyping assay. We could not detect any differences in the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)s) of amprenavir, indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and nelfinavir for the clones analyzed. However, we did observe hypersusceptibility to lopinavir solely in clone C6, which includes the I93L substitution (a 2.6-fold decrease in the IC(50) compared to that for the subtype B reference strain). The same phenotypic behavior was observed for 11 Brazilian and South African clinical isolates tested, in which only subtype C isolates carrying the I93L mutation presented significant hypersusceptibility to lopinavir.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Effects of valproic acid coadministration on plasma efavirenz and lopinavir concentrations in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults.

Valproic acid (VPA) has the potential to benefit patients suffering from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to determine if VPA affects the plasma concentration of efavirenz (EFV) or lopinavir. HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients receiving EFV or lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) had 9 or 10 blood samples drawn over 8 to 24 h of a dosing interval at steady state before and after receiving 250 mg of VPA twice daily for 7 days. VPA blood samples drawn before (C(0)) and 8 h after the morning dose (8 h) were compared to blood samples from a group of HIV-1-infected subjects who were taking either combined nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors alone or had discontinued antiretroviral therapy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis, and tests of bioequivalence were based on 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ratios or differences. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI) of the areas under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)s) of EFV (n = 11) with and without VPA was 1.00 (0.85, 1.17). The GMR (90% CI) of the AUC(0-8)s of LPV (n = 8) with and without VPA was 1.38 (0.98, 1.94). The differences (90% CI) in mean C(0) and 8-h VPA concentrations versus the control (n = 11) were -1.0 (-9.4, 7.4) microg/ml and -2.1 (-11.1, 6.9) microg/ml for EFV (n = 10) and -5.0 (-13.2, 3.3) microg/ml and -6.7 (-17.6, 4.2) microg/ml for LPV/r (n = 11), respectively. EFV administration alone is bioequivalent to EFV and VPA coadministration. LPV concentrations tended to be higher when the drug was combined with VPA. Results of VPA comparisons fail to raise concern that coadministration with EFV or LPV/r will significantly influence trough concentrations of VPA.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Simultaneous determination of the HIV drugs indinavir, amprenavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, the nelfinavir hydroxymetabolite M8, and nevirapine in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous quantitative determination of the currently available HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, the active nelfinavir metabolite M8, and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine in human plasma is described. The method involved liquid-liquid extraction from plasma, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with an OmniSpher 5 C18 column and ultraviolet detection set at a wavelength of 215 nm for the protease inhibitors and 280 nm for nevirapine. The runtime was 25 minutes. The assay has been validated over the concentration range of 0.05 to 30 mg/L for indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir, 0.07 to 30 mg/L for amprenavir and lopinavir, and 0.05 to 15 mg/L for M8 and nevirapine. This method proved to be simple, accurate, and precise and is useful for the therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine on a routine basis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A population approach to study the influence of nevirapine administration on lopinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-1 infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of nevirapine (NVP) on lopinavir (LPV) pharmacokinetics was investigated by a population analysis based on a non-linear mixed-effect modelling method. METHODS: In this analysis, 95 HIV-1 infected patients were studied [52 treated with LPV/ritonavir (400/100 mg twice a day) plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (group A), 22 patients treated with LPV/ritonavir (533.3/133.3 mg twice a day) plus NVP (group B) and 21 patients treated with LPV/ritonavir (400/100 mg twice a day) plus NVP (group C)]. RESULTS: The apparent clearance of LPV [mean+/-SD: 4.56+/-3.94 l h(-1) (group A) versus 7.14+/-1.77 l h(-1) (group B) versus 7.74+/-1.45 l h(-1) (group C)] was significantly (P <0.001) increased by the presence of NVP in the antiretroviral regimen and the mean trough plasma concentration of LPV was reduced in group C relative to group A [mean+/-SD: 2.23+/-1.35 mg/l versus 5.29+/-2.19 mg/l (P < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: These results suggest an induction of LPV metabolism by NVP.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Simultaneous determination of 8 HIV protease inhibitors in human plasma by isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography with combined use of UV and fluorescence detection: amprenavir, indinavir, atazanavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir and M8-nelfinavir metabolite.

A simple, accurate and fast method was developed for determination of the commonly used HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) amprenavir, indinavir, atazanavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, M8-nelfinavir metabolite and saquinavir in human plasma. Liquid-liquid extraction was used with hexane/ethylacetate from buffered plasma samples with a borate buffer pH 9.0. Isocratic chromatographic separation of all components was performed on an Allsphere hexyl HPLC column with combined UV and fluorescence detection. Calibration curves were constructed in the range of 0.025-10 mg/l. Accuracy and precision of the standards were all below 15% and the lowest limit of quantitation was 0.025 mg/l. Stability of quality control samples at different temperature conditions was found to be below 20% of nominal values. The advantages of this method are: (1) inclusion and determination of the newly approved atazanavir, (2) simultaneous isocratic HPLC separation of all compounds and (3) increased specificity and sensitivity for amprenavir by using fluorescence detection. This method can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring of all PIs currently commercialised and is now part of current clinical practice.

Atazanavir Sulfate↗
PubMed2007

The use of drug resistance algorithms and genotypic inhibitory quotient in prediction of lopinavir-ritonavir treatment response in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

BACKGROUND: Different approaches using genotypic, pharmacokinetic parameters or combination of both have been recently developed to monitor antiretroviral treatment in HIV-1-infected individuals. Their uses in clinical practice may improve the benefit of protease inhibitor-based salvage therapy while reducing treatment toxicity and emergence of viral resistance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prediction of genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) using different genotypic drug resistance interpretation's algorithms and lopinavir plasma concentration in PI-experienced patients treated by lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). Genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) was also evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-seven HIV-1 PI-experienced, but LPV naïve patients were included in a retrospective cohort study. Plasma HIV-1 viral load (VL), CD4 cell count and LPV plasma concentrations were assessed at weeks (W) 12 and 24. Interpretation of baseline resistance genotype was achieved according to four different algorithms and GSS calculated using two expert systems. GIQ was defined as the ratio of LPV concentration to the number of LPV resistance mutations at day 0 (D0) and patients classified by units of GIQ. The end point of the study was the virological response expressed in HIV VL median decrease from D0 to W24. RESULTS: The overall median VL decrease from D0 to W24 was -2.42 log(10)copies/mL and 60% of patients had VL below 400 copies/mL. The LPV mutation score was predictive of response for all algorithms whereas plasma concentrations of LPV were not. Mean VL decrease was greater for higher GIQ classes and difference reached statistical significance at W24. When considering virological response at W24, GSS calculated with ANRS and Stanford system were good predictor scores as areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were 0.76 for both. CONCLUSION: GIQ was found to be a useful drug-monitoring tool which could be helpful in targeting LPV concentrations in order to achieve long-term undetectable viral load, particularly in genotypic resistant patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

An enzyme immunoassay for the quantification of plasma and intracellular lopinavir in HIV-infected patients.

The protease inhibitor lopinavir (LPV; [1S-[1R*(R*), 3R*,4R*]]-N-[4-[[(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)-acetyl]amino]-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1-(phenylmethyl) pentyl] tetrahydro-alpha-(1-methylethyl)-2-oxo-1(2H)-pyrimide acetamide) is widely used in anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapy. Knowledge of the plasma and intracellular concentrations of the drug would be useful for a better understanding of LPV action and for therapeutic monitoring. The aim of this study was to develop a sensitive and specific immunoassay for LPV in plasma and cells. Anti-LPV polyclonal antibodies were raised in rabbits using a synthetic LPV derivative coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as immunogen. The enzyme tracer was prepared by chemically coupling the LPV derivative with acetylcholinesterase. These reagents were used to develop a competitive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) performed in microtitration plates. The assay was performed on a minimum of 50 microl of plasma or 2 x 10(6) cells. It showed good precision and efficiency in as much as recovery from human plasma and cell extracts spiked with LPV ranged between 87% and 104%, with coefficients of variation of less than 10%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 100 pg/ml, i.e., a value at least 10 times lower than those currently achieved using previously described techniques. Cross-validation with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) revealed a good correlation between methods (r2=0.96). Intracellular concentrations of LPV were measured in cultured human T lymphoblastoid cells (CEM). A pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and intracellular LPV was performed on a healthy volunteer, and measurements were done in patients infected with HIV. The results obtained indicated a high intracellular/extracellular concentration ratio in cultured cells (19.3) but not in cells from HIV patients (1.3). In contrast, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) the accumulation of ritonavir (RTV) was six times higher than LPV. To date, this is the first reported immunoassay for LPV, and this method is sensitive enough for monitoring plasma and intracellular LPV levels in HIV-infected patients and for intracellular studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

X-ray crystallographic structure of ABT-378 (lopinavir) bound to HIV-1 protease.

The crystal structure of ABT-378 (lopinavir), bound to the active site of HIV-1 protease is described. A comparison with crystal structures of ritonavir, A-78791, and BILA-2450 shows some analogous features with previous reported compounds. A cyclic urea unit in the P(2) position of ABT-378 is novel and makes two bidentate hydrogen bonds with Asp 29 of HIV-1 protease. In addition, a previously unreported shift in the Gly 48 carbonyl position is observed. A discussion of the structural features responsible for its high potency against wild-type HIV protease is given along with an analysis of the effect of active site mutations on potency in in vitro assays.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2003

Tenofovir-related Fanconi syndrome with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: the role of lopinavir-ritonavir-didanosine.

Tenofovir-related tubular damage, like all other recently reported cases, occurred in patients receiving the protease inhibitor (PI) ritonavir, often with lopinavir. Increased plasma concentrations of didanosine were also observed after the addition of tenofovir. It was suspected that tenofovir with PIs interacted with renal organic anion transporters, leading to nephrotoxic tubular concentrations of tenofovir and systemic accumulation of didanosine. Until there is a better understanding of these interactions, close monitoring is recommended for patients receiving tenofovir, PIs, and didanosine.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗