Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Loperamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

A blind, randomized comparison of racecadotril and loperamide for stopping acute diarrhea in adults.

AIM: Racecadotril is a specific enkephalinase inhibitor that exhibits intestinal antisecretory activity without affecting intestinal transit. Loperamide is an effective anti-diarrheal agent, but it usually induces constipation. This study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of racecadotril versus loperamide in the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea in adults. METHODS: A two-center, randomized, parallel-group, single-blind study was carried out to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of racecadotril (100 mg thrice daily) and loperamide (2.0 mg 2 twice daily) in 62 adult patients suffering from acute diarrhea. The main efficacy criterion used was the duration of diarrhea after beginning the treatment (in hours). Other signs and symptoms were also evaluated. RESULTS: The clinical success rates for these anti-diarrheal treatments were 95.7% and 92.0% for racecadotril and loperamide respectively. Patients on racecadotril had a median duration of diarrhea of 19.5 h compared with a median of 13 h for patients on loperamide. Rapid improvement in anal burn and nausea was found for each drug. However, more patients on loperamide suffered from reactive constipation (29.0% vs 12.9%). Itching, another adverse event was notably higher in the racecadotril group (28.6% vs 0%). With regard to other adverse events, the two medications showed similar occurrence rates and similar concomitant medication usage rates. CONCLUSION: Racecadotril and loperamide are rapid, equally effective treatments for acute diarrhea in adults, but loperamide treatment is associated with a higher incidence of treatment-related constipation.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Loperamide (ADL 2-1294), an opioid antihyperalgesic agent with peripheral selectivity.

The antihyperalgesic properties of the opiate antidiarrheal agent loperamide (ADL 2-1294) were investigated in a variety of inflammatory pain models in rodents. Loperamide exhibited potent affinity and selectivity for the cloned micro (Ki = 3 nM) compared with the delta (Ki = 48 nM) and kappa (Ki = 1156 nM) human opioid receptors. Loperamide potently stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding (EC50 = 56 nM), and inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (IC50 = 25 nM) in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the human mu opioid receptor. The injection of 0.3 mg of loperamide into the intra-articular space of the inflamed rat knee joint resulted in potent antinociception to knee compression that was antagonized by naloxone, whereas injection into the contralateral knee joint or via the i.m. route failed to inhibit compression-induced changes in blood pressure. Loperamide potently inhibited late-phase formalin-induced flinching after intrapaw injection (A50 = 6 microgram) but was ineffective against early-phase flinching or after injection into the paw contralateral to the formalin-treated paw. Local injection of loperamide also produced antinociception against Freund's adjuvant- (ED50 = 21 microgram) or tape stripping- (ED50 = 71 microgram) induced hyperalgesia as demonstrated by increased paw pressure thresholds in the inflamed paw. In all animal models examined, the potency of loperamide after local administration was comparable to or better than that of morphine. Loperamide has potential therapeutic use as a peripherally selective opiate antihyperalgesic agent that lacks many of the side effects generally associated with administration of centrally acting opiates.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1976

Loperamide binding to opiate receptor sites of brain and myenteric plexus.

Loperamide, a new antidiarrheal agent, was tested to determine whether its biological activity involves binding to opiate receptor sites. Loperamide and morphine competitively inhibited 3H-naloxone binding to homogenates a guinea-pig brain and myenteric plexus. The Kp values obtain in the presence of Na+ were: morphine, 9.60-10(-9) M (brain), 1.66-10(-7) M (myenteric plexus); loperamide, 7.20-10(-9) M (brain), 1.33-10(-7) M (myenteric plexus); naloxone, 4.78-10(-10) M (brain), 1.27-10(-9) M (myenteric plexus. In the absence of Na+, binding a loperamide and morphine to brain homogenate was enhanced while the binding of naloxone was reduced. Morphine (IC50 = 7.5-10(-8) M) and loperamide (IC50 = 6.9-10(-9) M) inhibited the electrically induced contractions of longitudinal muscle from guinea-pig ileum, and naloxone competitively antagonized these effects. The Kd value calculated for the interaction of naloxone with binding sites associated with the contracting muscle was between 0.98-10(-9) M and 1.85-10(-9) M. In the mouse hot plate test, subcutaneous administration of morphine (minimal effective dose = 6.6 mugmol/kg) and loperamide (minimal effective dose = 78 mugmol/kg) delayed the response to heat stimuli and this effect was completely blocked by prior administration of naloxone. In the anesthetixed dog, intravenous administration of morphine (100 mug/kg) and loperamide (100 mug/kg) enhanced the contractile activity of circular muscle in proximal and distal duodenum, distal ileum and proximal colon but duodenal longitudinal muscle was relaxed; these effects were completely reversed by subsequent administration of naloxone. It is concluded that loperamide binds to opiate receptor sites and possesses opiate agonist activity both in vivo and in vitro.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1984

Mechanism of the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide.

To determine whether the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide is due to an effect on intestinal motor function or to an acceleration of the rate of absorption by the intestine (as has been suggested recently), we studied absorption during experimental diarrhea produced by the rapid intragastric infusion of electrolyte solution. In studies in which a 2700-ml bolus of electrolyte solution was infused into the stomach over 90 min, loperamide delayed the appearance of rectal effluent in each of 5 subjects and decreased the volume of rectal effluent from 1090 +/- 118 to 770 +/- 73 ml (p = 0.05). When intragastric infusion was continued for 5 h, producing steady-state total gut perfusion, the volume of effluent produced per unit time and the concentration of a nonabsorbable polyethylene glycol marker in rectal effluent was not different with or without loperamide, indicating that loperamide did not alter the rate of absorption by intestinal mucosal cells. Loperamide also had no effect during steady-state perfusion when absorption rates were reduced by intravenous infusion of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. Loperamide did substantially increase the intraluminal volume of the total gut, from 985 +/- 131 to 1764 +/- 195 ml (p less than 0.02). These results suggest that loperamide exerts its antidiarrheal effect by a change in the motor function of the intestine, which results in increased capacitance of the gut and a delay in the passage of fluid through the intestine. This change in motor function, rather than a change in the rate of absorption by intestinal mucosal cells, is responsible for the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide in our experimental diarrhea model.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Loperamide oxide in the treatment of acute diarrhea in adults.

We evaluated two doses of loperamide oxide (1 mg and 2 mg) and placebo in the treatment of acute diarrhea in 230 adult patients. Two tablets were taken initially and then one tablet after each watery, loose, or pasty stool to a maximum of eight tablets per day. The median time to complete relief was 27 hours 55 minutes for the 1-mg loperamide oxide group, 25 hours for the 2-mg loperamide oxide group, and 40 hours 35 minutes for the placebo group (P < 0.05). The investigator rated treatment as good or excellent for 78% of patients in each group treated with loperamide oxide and 62% of patients who received placebo. Constipation-like periods were no more common with loperamide oxide than with placebo. Adverse events were reported by four patients given loperamide oxide and three patients given placebo. The results demonstrate superior efficacy of loperamide oxide compared with placebo in the treatment of acute diarrhea in adults; because both doses of loperamide oxide are equally effective, the lower (1-mg) dose is preferred.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1989

Effects of the opiate agonist loperamide on pituitary-adrenal function in patients with suspected hypercortisolism.

In the present work the possible use of loperamide, an opiate agonist, in the dynamic evaluation of patients with suspected hypercortisolism was investigated. The effects of loperamide on plasma ACTH and cortisol levels were evaluated in normal subjects and in 58 patients with suspected Cushing's syndrome. The results were compared to those obtained after the overnight dexamethasone suppression test. In normal subjects plasma ACTH and cortisol levels were significantly (p less than 0.005) suppressed by both loperamide (16 mg po) and dexamethasone (1 mg po). In 17 patients, in whom the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome was confirmed by subsequent investigations, neither loperamide or dexamethasone inhibited cortisol (from a baseline of 606 +/- 55 nmol/L) to a nadir of 502 +/- 43 nmol/L and 539 +/- 50 nmol/L, respectively) and ACTH concentration (from a basal level of 70.1 +/- 11.8 pg/ml to a nadir of 46.0 +/- 8.6 pg/ml and 54.3 +/- 7.5 pg/ml, respectively). In 34 patients, in whom the suspect of hypercortisolism was ruled out, either loperamide or dexamethasone suppressed the pituitary-adrenal axis: cortisol and ACTH levels significantly fell from 417 +/- 24 nmol/L and 28.3 +/- 3.5 pg/ml to 60 +/- 6 nmol/L and 14.4 +/- 1.4 pg/ml after loperamide and to 26 +/- 4 nmol and 16.4 +/- 1.7 pg/ml after dexamethasone. In 7 patients discordant responses were observed. In 3 patients treated with antiepileptic drugs ACTH and cortisol levels were inhibited by loperamide, but not by dexamethasone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenocortical Hyperfunction↗
PubMed1990

Comparative efficacy of loperamide hydrochloride and bismuth subsalicylate in the management of acute diarrhea.

An open-label, parallel comparison of loperamide hydrochloride (Imodium A-D) and bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol) was conducted using nonprescription dosages in adult students with acute diarrhea (three or more unformed stools in the preceding 24 hours plus at least one additional symptom of enteric infection). For the two-day study period, the daily dosage was limited to 8 mg (40 ml) for loperamide-treated subjects and to 4.9 g for bismuth subsalicylate-treated subjects. At these dosages, loperamide significantly reduced the average number of unformed bowel movements relative to bismuth subsalicylate. Following the initial dose of treatment, control of diarrhea was maintained significantly longer with loperamide than with bismuth subsalicylate. Time to last unformed stool was significantly shorter with loperamide than with bismuth subsalicylate. In providing overall subjective relief, subjects rated loperamide significantly better than bismuth subsalicylate at the end of the 24 hours. Both treatments were well tolerated, and none of the minor adverse effects reported resulted in discontinuation of therapy. It was concluded that loperamide is effective at a daily dosage limit of 8 mg (40 ml) for the treatment of acute nonspecific diarrhea and provides faster, more effective relief than bismuth subsalicylate.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Loperamide effects on hepatobiliary function, intestinal transit and analgesia in mice.

Loperamide effects on hepatobiliary function, analgesia and gut transit were studied in mice. Varying doses of the antidiarrheal drug, loperamide, were administered to mice by intracerebroventricular, intravenous, subcutaneous and intragastric routes. Gut motility was determined by intestinal transit of India ink, analgesia by warm water tail flick latency, and hepatobiliary function by retention of the anionic dye, sulfobromophthalein in plasma and liver. When given by all routes at modest doses, loperamide slowed intestinal transit. Analgesia, a centrally mediated opiate effect, was only detected after intracerebroventricular or subcutaneous loperamide at high, near-toxic doses. Elevations of plasma and liver sulfobromophthalein were noted at routes and doses which slowed gut transit, well below those needed for analgesia. Intragastric loperamide at one fortieth its LD50 caused marked elevation of sulfobromophthalein levels and gut slowing, but no analgesia. Sulfobromophthalein elevation and gut slowing by intragastric loperamide were not affected by spinal cord transection but were reversed by naltrexone, an opiate antagonist. Non-toxic doses of loperamide slow gut transit and modify hepatobiliary function in mice by opiate actions at peripheral sites.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of the peripheral and central effects of the opioid agonists loperamide and morphine in the formalin test in rats.

The effects of the peripherally restricted opioid agonist loperamide were compared to those of morphine in the formalin test in rats. Both loperamide and morphine were efficacious in producing antihyperalgesia after both subcutaneous and intracisternal administration. The antihyperalgesic effects of peripherally administered loperamide and morphine were antagonized by both naloxone and its quaternary derivative naloxone methiodide. The effects of intracisternally administered loperamide and morphine were antagonized by naloxone SC. However, quaternary naloxone SC did not block the effects of intracisternally administered loperamide, and, quaternary naloxone blocked intracisternally morphine only at a dose approximately 10-fold higher than that required to block peripherally administered morphine. In addition, approximately 10-fold higher doses of naloxone administered SC were required to antagonize loperamide compared to doses required to antagonize morphine when the agonists were administered subcutaneously, suggesting that the effects of loperamide might be mediated by opioid receptors different from those which mediated the effects of morphine. However, neither the kappa-receptor selective antagonist nor-binaltorphimine nor the delta-receptor selective antagonist naltrindole blocked the effects of either opioid agonist. The present results are consistent with the interpretation that the antihyperalgesic effects of opioid agonists can have both a peripheral and a central component of action, and that the peripheral component of action is sufficient to produce antihyperalgesia in the formalin test after peripheral administration. The present results provide further evidence that peripherally restricted opioid agonists might provide clinically useful treatment of some pain states, in particular pain states that might involve sensitization of peripheral nociceptors.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2000

Effect of loperamide on mucosal guanylyl cyclase activity in rat jejunum following Escherichia coli heat-stable toxin-induced fluid accumulation.

Loperamide has antidiarrhoeal activities against secretagogues with different mechanisms of action. Besides its opioid-like effect on intestinal motility and secretion it might exhibit additional antisecretory properties which may not be completely elucidated yet. Direct effects of loperamide on mucosal guanylyl cyclase have never been observed. We therefore investigated the effect of loperamide on intestinal fluid transport altered by heat-stable Escherichia coli enterotoxin which acts by stimulating mucosal guanylyl cyclase. Net fluid movement was determined during a 1 hr incubation period in ligated jejunal loops of anaesthetised female Wistar rats. Transport rates of net fluid movement were calculated from the loop contents measured gravimetrically at the beginning and the end of the experiments. Addition of heat-stable Escherichia coli enterotoxin to the luminal solution resulted in a net secretion of water which was significantly reversed into net absorption by loperamide. The specific activity of the particulate guanylyl cyclase was determined in mucosal scrapings of the jejunum without and with the addition of heat-stable Escherichia coli enterotoxin and/or loperamide. Additions of loperamide of up to 10 micromol/l did not change guanylyl cyclase activity. We conclude that the effect of loperamide counteracting heat-stable Escherichia coli enterotoxin induced changes of intestinal fluid transport does not involve a direct effect on guanylyl cyclase.

Animals↗
PubMed1980

Abuse potential of loperamide.

Effects of the currently marketed form of loperamide (Imodium capsules) that might relate to abuse potential were examined. Study I was a double-blind "dose run-up" in adult male subjects with a history of illicit drug use but no history of opioid addiction. Subjective responses to doses of loperamide ranging from 12 to 60 mg were compared with responses to 120 mg codeine sulfate (96 mg base) and to placebo. Based on study I, loperamide (60 mg) was used in study II and its effects were compared with those of codeine (96 mg base) and placebo in an exaddict subject group. Study II subjects had had extensive opioid experience but were not actively addicted at the time of this double-blind, inpatient study. In study II, as in study I, unlike loperamide and placebo, codeine induced pupillary constriction. Loperamide (60 mg) induced a detectable subjective effect in somewhat over half the subjects, was "liked" little or not at all, and was identified as "dope" at a frequency less than that for a threshold dose of oral codeine. It was concluded that in its present form, i.e., capsules containing loperamide mixed with magnesium stearate, loperamide poses little threat of potential abuse.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Suppression of vagus-mediated pancreatic polypeptide release by the mu-opiate receptor agonist loperamide in man.

1. Morphine suppresses the release of pancreatic polypeptide, a hormone under vagal cholinergic control. The intention of the study was to detect whether the mu-opiate receptor agonist loperamide is also able to inhibit pancreatic polypeptide release, and to define its site of action. 2. In groups of healthy subjects (n = 6 each) stimulation of pancreatic polypeptide was assessed in five different tests: (i) insulin-hypoglycaemia; (ii) modified sham feeding; (iii) intravenous infusion of the cholecystokinin analogue ceruletide; (iv) injection of corticotropin releasing hormone; (v) infusion of the muscarinic acetylcholine agonist bethanechol. All tests were performed after oral application of either a placebo or loperamide (16 mg), tests (ii) and (iii) were repeated with loperamide in smaller doses (2 and 6 mg), with loperamide plus naloxone, with naloxone alone, and with infusion of atropine. Plasma concentrations of pancreatic polypeptide were measured radioimmunologically. 3. Release of pancreatic polypeptide in test (i) to (iv) was completely blocked by 16 mg loperamide, whereas bethanechol-stimulated release (test 5) was not influenced. Tests (ii) and (iii) showed that the inhibition was dose-dependent and could be attenuated by naloxone. The inhibitory effect of loperamide was comparable with that of atropine. 4. We conclude that loperamide causes a dose-dependent inhibition of pancreatic polypeptide release mediated by vagal-cholinergic pathways, but does not have an atropine-like peripheral action.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Ritonavir increases loperamide plasma concentrations without evidence for P-glycoprotein involvement.

BACKGROUND: The antidiarrheal drug loperamide is frequently used to treat ritonavir-associated diarrhea in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. The absence of marked central opioid effects has been attributed to its low bioavailability and its poor penetration of the blood-brain barrier, both of which might be altered by ritonavir, a potent P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P4503A inhibitor. METHODS: A 16-mg dose of loperamide was administered to 12 healthy male and female volunteers together with either 600 mg of ritonavir or placebo. Detailed pharmacokinetics of loperamide and its metabolites were determined over 72 hours. Central opioid effects were measured by evaluation of pupil diameter, cold pressor test, and transcutaneous PCO2 and PO2. RESULTS: Ritonavir caused a major pharmacokinetic interaction, increasing the area under the concentration-time curve of loperamide from 104 +/- 60 h x pmol/ml after placebo to 276 +/- 68 h. pmol/ml and delayed formation of the major metabolite desmethylloperamide (time to reach maximum concentration after drug administration [t(max)], 7.1 +/- 2.6 hours versus 19.6 +/- 9.1 hours). The urinary metabolic ratio of loperamide increased 3 times whereas the total molar amount of loperamide and metabolites excreted in urine remained unchanged. No central pharmacodynamic effects were observed after coadministration of loperamide with either ritonavir or placebo. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a major metabolic interaction probably by cytochrome P4503A4 with no evidence of P-glycoprotein involvement. This might explain the lack of central effects after ritonavir.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2002

A multinational comparison of racecadotril and loperamide in the treatment of acute watery diarrhoea in adults.

BACKGROUND: Racecadotril (acetorphan) is an orally active, potent inhibitor of enkephalinase, which exerts an antihypersecretory effect without increasing intestinal transit time. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of racecadotril with those of loperamide by assessing their effects on the resolution of the signs and symptoms of diarrhoea in patients in developing countries who had acute watery diarrhoea of less than 5 days' duration. METHODS: 945 outpatients from 21 centres in 14 countries received racecadotril (100 mg) or loperamide (2 mg) three times daily in a single-blind study. Duration of diarrhoea was the primary measure of efficacy; secondary criteria were overall clinical response, occurrence and duration of abdominal pain and distension, and occurrence of other associated signs and symptoms. Occurrence of constipation and adverse events were the main safety assessments. RESULTS: Diarrhoea resolved rapidly with both racecadotril and loperamide (55.0 h in both groups), 92% of patients on racecadotril and 93% on loperamide being treatment successes. Racecadotril produced a significantly greater reduction in abdominal pain and distension than loperamide (P = 0.024 and 0.03, respectively). The duration of abdominal distension was significantly shorter with racecadotril (5.4 versus 24.4 h; P = 0.0001), and constipation was also significantly less frequent (16% versus 25%; P = 0.001). One-hundred-and-eighty patients (19%) experienced one or more adverse event during the study: 67 (14.2%) in the racecadotril group and 113 (23.9%) in the loperamide group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Racecadotril resolved the symptoms of acute diarrhoea rapidly and effectively, and produced more rapid resolution of abdominal symptoms and less constipation than loperamide.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Tissue distribution of loperamide and N-desmethylloperamide following a fatal overdose.

We report a case involving a fatal intoxication with loperamide (Imodium). Loperamide is a synthetic opioid of the phenyl piperidine class used as an over-the-counter antidiarrheal. It exerts its effects through interaction with micro-opiate receptors in the intestine to reduce peristalsis. Loperamide lacks the typical euphoric opiate effects when administered at recommended doses. Both loperamide and its major metabolite, N-desmethylloperamide, were isolated by liquid-liquid extraction into n-butyl chloride from alkalinized samples. Extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography-electrospray-mass spectrometry in selected-ion-monitoring mode. Rapid separation of the drug, metabolite, and internal standard (diphenoxylate) was achieved using a high-resolution C18 column with 1.8-microm particle diameter. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in deionized water (60%) and acetonitrile (40%) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Heart blood concentrations for loperamide and its metabolite were 1.2 mg/L and 3.3 mg/L, respectively. In contrast, reported peak plasma concentrations of loperamide after administration of recommended daily doses of 16 mg did not exceed 0.012 mg/L in controlled trials. Because the heart blood ethanol concentration was 0.08 g/dL, the medical examiner ruled that the cause of death was loperamide and ethanol intoxication, and the manner of death as undetermined.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Characterization of the antihyperalgesic action of a novel peripheral mu-opioid receptor agonist--loperamide.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that locally administered opioid agonists produce an antihyperalgesic effect through peripheral opioid receptors in inflamed tissue. Loperamide, a mu opioid agonist, does not cross the blood-brain barrier and therefore lacks central effects after systemic administration. The authors defined the effects of topical loperamide on a thermal injury-induced hyperalgesia. METHODS: In halothane-anesthetized rats, thermal injury was induced by placing the plantar surface of a hindpaw on a hot plate (52.0+/-1 degrees C) for 45 s. Loperamide was prepared in a cream emulsion (ADL 2-1294B, 0.5%, 1.7%, and 5.0%). The drug was applied as follows: before or after injury on the injured paw and on a normal paw and after injury on the injured paw of morphine-tolerant rats. Paw withdrawal latency to a radiant heat source was measured to determine the nociceptive threshold. A pharmacokinetic study was performed with the use of 14C-labeled drug. RESULTS: Thermal injury yielded a significant thermal hyperalgesia. Loperamide, but not the vehicle, posttreatment on the injured paw resulted in a dose-dependent antihyperalgesic effect, which was reversible with naloxone (1 mg/kg given intraperitoneally). Treatment with loperamide on the normal paw produced short-lasting hypoalgesia, but the effect was not reversible with naloxone. Pretreatment at 1 and 2 but not 4 h with loperamide was effective. A rightward shift of the dose-response curve was observed in rats made tolerant to systemic morphine with subcutaneous morphine pellets. No rats with drug treatment displayed any evident behavior changes (eg., loss of corneal or pinna reflexes or change in ambulation). Drug activity in the tissue revealed an elimination half life of 2.3 h and negligible concentration in the blood. CONCLUSIONS: Loperamide, a peripherally acting mu opioid agonist, applied topically at the site of inflammation possesses a significant antihyperalgesic action without any systemic side effects.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1986

Loperamide: evidence for a centrally mediated opioid effect on rumen motility in conscious goats and sheep.

Loperamide inhibited the frequency and amplitude of cyclical contractions of the rumen in conscious goats (100 micrograms/kg, i.v. and sheep (250 micrograms/kg, i.v.). In goats, the inhibitory effect of loperamide could be prevented by pretreatment with the opiate antagonist naltrexone (greater than or equal to 12.5 micrograms/kg, i.v.) but not by pretreatment with the dopaminergic antagonist domperidone (500 micrograms/kg, i.v.). Intracerebroventricular administration of 1 microgram/kg loperamide in goats significantly depressed ruminal contraction frequency, whereas intravenous administration of 10 micrograms/kg loperamide did not affect cyclical motility. Administered via the carotid artery, loperamide (4 micrograms/kg) depressed both frequency and amplitude of cyclical contractions of reticulum and rumen, whereas the same dose was ineffective via the coeliac artery. In vitro, loperamide (10 nM-100 microM) had no influence on spontaneous activity or tone of the reticular longitudinal muscle strips. It is concluded that loperamide inhibits cyclical ruminal contractions through a central opioid pathway.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Antiallodynic effects of loperamide and fentanyl against topical capsaicin-induced allodynia in unanesthetized primates.

Capsaicin produces thermal allodynia in animals and humans by acting as an agonist at vanilloid receptor subtype 1 [VR1; also known as transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1)]. VR1 receptors are widely distributed in the periphery (e.g., on primary afferent neurons). These studies examined the ability of loperamide (0.1-1 mg/kg s.c.; a micro-opioid agonist that is peripherally selective after systemic administration), in preventing and reversing thermal allodynia caused by topical capsaicin (0.004 M) in rhesus monkeys, within a tail withdrawal assay (n = 4; 38 degrees C and 42 degrees C; normally non-noxious thermal stimuli). The effects of loperamide were compared with those of the centrally penetrating micro-agonist, fentanyl (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg s.c.). We also characterized the allodynic effects of the endogenous VR1 agonist ("endovanilloid"), N-oleoyldopamine (OLDA; 0.0013-0.004 M). In this model, loperamide and fentanyl produced dose-dependent prevention of capsaicin-induced allodynia, whereas only fentanyl produced robust reversal of ongoing allodynia. Antagonism experiments with naltrexone (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) or its analog, methylnaltrexone (0.32 mg/kg s.c.), which does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, suggest that the antiallodynic effects of loperamide and fentanyl were predominantly mediated by peripherally and centrally located micro-receptors, respectively. Loperamide and fentanyl (1 mg/kg and 0.032 mg/kg, respectively) also prevented OLDA (0.004 M)-induced allodynia. Up to the largest dose studied, loperamide was devoid of thermal antinociceptive effects at 48 degrees C (a noxious thermal stimulus, in the absence of capsaicin). By contrast, fentanyl (0.01-0.032 mg/kg) caused dose-dependent antinociception in this sensitive thermal antinociceptive assay (a presumed centrally mediated effect). These studies show that loperamide, acting as a peripherally selective micro-agonist after systemic administration, can prevent capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia in primates in vivo, in the absence of thermal antinociceptive effects.

Administration, Topical↗