Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Inhalation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Augmentation of antibody responses of mice to inhaled protein antigens by simultaneously inhaled bacterial lipopolysaccharides.

Serum antibody responses of mice to repeatedly inhaled protein antigens such as bovine serum albumin and ovalbumin, plus or minus bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the form of an aerosol were studied. Results showed that the levels of responses to inhaled protein antigens varied, depending on the mouse strain-antigen combination and that LPS inhaled simultaneously with the antigens definitely augmented the responses which were not otherwise very high. LPS extracted from Klebsiella O3 (LPS-K) but not LPS from Escherichia coli O55 (LPS-E), which was inhaled at the time of initial inhalation of antigen, significantly intensified the priming for the secondary antibody response to the antigen subsequently inhaled. Both LPS-K and LPS-E, however, definitely acted to augment the response when they were inhaled repeatedly together with the antigen. Oral administration of antigen or antigen plus LPS-K did not induce any detectable antibody response in our experiment, ruling out the possibility that the antigen and LPS stimulated the immune system via alimentary canal rather than via lung. Tissue distribution of the radioactivity soon after inhalation of 131I-labeled antigen and decay speed of the radioactivity were not significantly changed by LPS-K inhaled simultaneously. This suggested that the augmentation of responses was not mediated by the action of LPS to modulate the air-blood barrier against the entry of antigen via lung. All the results prove for the first time that inhaled LPS displays a definite adjuvant action on antibody responses to inhaled antigens.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1998

Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and physiologic response of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In addition, the effect of various doses of inhaled NO on clinical outcome parameters was assessed. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Intensive care units of 30 academic, teaching, and community hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients with ARDS, as defined by the American-European Consensus Conference, were enrolled into the study if the onset of disease was within 72 hrs of randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive placebo (nitrogen gas) or inhaled NO at concentrations of 1.25, 5, 20, 40, or 80 ppm. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Acute increases in PaO2, decreases in mean pulmonary arterial pressure, intensity of mechanical ventilation, and oxygenation index were examined. Clinical outcomes examined were the dose effects of inhaled NO on mortality, the number of days alive and off mechanical ventilation, and the number of days alive after meeting oxygenation criteria for extubation. A total of 177 patients were enrolled over a 14-month period. An acute response to treatment gas, defined as a PaO2 increase > or =20%, was seen in 60% of the patients receiving inhaled NO with no significant differences between dose groups. Twenty-four percent of placebo patients also had an acute response to treatment gas during the first 4 hrs. The initial increase in oxygenation translated into a reduction in the FIO2 over the first day and in the intensity of mechanical ventilation over the first 4 days of treatment, as measured by the oxygenation index. There were no differences among the pooled inhaled NO groups and placebo with respect to mortality rate, the number of days alive and off mechanical ventilation, or the number of days alive after meeting oxygenation criteria for extubation. However, patients receiving 5 ppm inhaled NO showed an improvement in these parameters. In this dose group, the percentage of patients alive and off mechanical ventilation at day 28 (a post hoc analysis) was higher (62% vs. 44%) than the placebo group. There was no apparent difference in the number or type of adverse events reported among those patients receiving inhaled NO compared with placebo. Four patients had methemoglobin concentrations >5%. The mean inspired nitrogen dioxide concentration in inhaled NO patients was 1.5 ppm. CONCLUSIONS: From this placebo-controlled study, inhaled NO appears to be well tolerated in the population of ARDS patients studied. With mechanical ventilation held constant, inhaled NO is associated with a significant improvement in oxygenation compared with placebo over the first 4 hrs of treatment. An improvement in oxygenation index was observed over the first 4 days. Larger phase III studies are needed to ascertain if these acute physiologic improvements can lead to altered clinical outcome.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

The effects of inhaled nitric oxide on the levels of cGMP plasma and lung tissue in a canine model of smoke inhalation injury.

The effects of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) on pulmonary hypertension and their mechanisms were studied in a canine model of smoke inhalation injury. Twenty-one dogs were randomly divided into three groups: four dogs constituted the normal control group, eight dogs subjected to smoke inhalation followed by O(2) inhalation (FiO(2)=0.45) constituted the injury control group, and nine dogs inhaling a mixture of O(2) and 45ppm nitric oxide after smoke exposure served as the treatment group. The levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in arterial plasma of the treatment group were higher than that of the control group at 5, 8, and 12h after smoke exposure, while the levels of cGMP in lung tissue were also significantly higher compared with that of the control group (P<0.01). The levels of cGMP of injury control group were decreased significantly compared with normal controls (P<0.05). Pulmonary vasoconstriction following smoke inhalation was significantly attenuated by inhalation of NO (P<0.05), which exerted no apparent effect on the systemic circulation (P>0.05). Inhalation of NO may lower pulmonary hypertension induced by smoke inhalation injury in dogs. The selective effect of NO on pulmonary circulation may be attributed to an increase in level of cGMP in smooth muscle cells of the lung tissue after inhalation of NO.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2000

Inhaled short acting beta2-agonist use in asthma: regular vs as needed treatment.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonists delivered by inhalation are very widely used in asthma. There has been much controversy of the use and possible consequences of the use of these agents for regular, as opposed as-needed use in asthma. OBJECTIVES: This review to assessed the clinical trial evidence to test whether using regular use of short-acting beta2-agonists reduced asthma control and pulmonary function; worsened symptoms, airway reactivity and quality of life; and increased the rate of exacerbations. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was carried out of the Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez* RCT" register using the terms: regular AND [beta agonist OR bronchodilator OR salbutamol OR albuterol Or terbutaline OR isoproterenol OR reproterol OR fenoterol]. Bibliographies of existing trials were searched and primary trial authors and pharmaceutical companies were approached for additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in which the short-acting beta2-agonist was given regularly in the experimental group, together with an inhaled bronchodilator for relief of symptoms ('rescue use'). The control group consisted of matching placebo inhaled regularly, with an inhaled bronchodilator for as-needed 'rescue use'. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted and quality assessments were made by both reviewers. Parallel group and cross-over trials were analysed separately. Where possible data were pooled using a fixed effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Over 800 abstracts were identified, following a review, 60 papers were requested for full assessment by both reviewers. 34 trials from 30 papers met the entry criteria. Data from 31 outcomes were analyzable. There was little difference between the treatments for nearly all outcomes. In cross-over studies, evening peak flow was better with regular treatment, weighted mean difference (WMD) 13.1 l/min (95% confidence interval 24.3, 1.9). In contrast, the FEV1 was better with as-needed treatment (WMD 157 ml (95% CI: 123, 192). Bronchial hyper reactivity was slightly better in the as-needed group, standardised mean difference 0.23, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.12. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: These results support current guidelines. There is little advantage in using short-acting beta2-agonists regularly, and potentially some small clinical disadvantage.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2000

Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. EDICI.

Inefficient inhaler technique is a common problem resulting in poor drug delivery, decreased disease control and increased inhaler use. The aim of this study was to assess patients' use of different inhaler devices and to ascertain whether patient preference is indicative of ease of use and whether current inhaler use has any influence on either technique or preference. We also wished to define the most appropriate method of selecting an inhaler for a patient, taking into account observed technique and device cost. One hundred patients received instruction, in randomized order, in the use of seven different inhaler devices. After instruction they were graded (using predetermined criteria) in their inhaler technique. After assessment patients were asked which three inhalers they most preferred and which, if any, they currently used. Technique was best using the breath-actuated inhalers; the Easi-Breathe and Autohaler, with 91% seen to have good technique. The pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) fared poorly, in last position with only 79% of patients showing good technique, despite being the most commonly prescribed. The Easi-Breathe was by far the most popular device with the patients. The Autohaler came in second position closely followed by the Clickhaler and Accuhaler. The majority of patients (55%) currently used the pMDI but the pMDI did not score highly for preference or achieve better grades than the other devices. Only 79% of patients tested could use the pMDI effectively even after expert instruction yet it continues to be commonly prescribed. This has important repercussions for drug delivery and hence disease control. Prescribing a patient's preferred device increases cost but can improve efficiency and therefore be cost effective in the long term. Using an inexpensive device (pMDI) when technique is good and the patient's preferred inhaler device when not is one way to optimize delivery and may even reduce cost.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Patient perception of the diskus inhaler: a comparison with the turbuhaler inhaler.

Asthmatic patients who were regular and experienced users of the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) but with no history of powder inhaler use were interviewed by questionnaire. Most (71%) of the 159 adults recruited had suffered from asthma for more than five years; 89% had used an MDI for more than one year. In all, 153 (97%) found their current MDI easy or very easy to handle. Effectiveness in delivering the drug and ease of operation were the two features of the device they were most satisfied with. The two features 'of an ideal inhaler' rated most highly were the presence of a dose counter and ease of use during an attack (58% and 72% of respondents, respectively). Other important features included hygiene, sensation that a dose had been taken, and small size. When attitudes towards the Diskus inhaler and the Turbuhaler inhaler were compared, 108 (68%) would have been quite or very happy to have a Diskus inhaler prescribed for them, and 79 (50%) a Turbuhaler inhaler. The Diskus inhaler scored significantly better than the Turbuhaler inhaler for knowing how many doses were left, the presence of an attached cover, attractiveness (p < 0.001), hygiene, shape, weight (p = 0.001), and perceived ease of use (p = 0.002). The Turbuhaler inhaler scored significantly better in terms of size (p < 0.001). Overall, the Diskus inhaler was preferred by 104 of 159 patients (p < 0.001), with perceived ease of use, the dose counter, and shape cited as the main reasons for preference.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Efficacy response of inhaled HFA-albuterol delivered via the breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device is comparable to dose in patients with asthma.

Handling difficulties, such as poor coordination of actuation and inhalation, are common in patients using press and breathe (P&Bs) metered-dose inhalers to administer asthma medication. Although spacers can help overcome some difficulties, the cumbersome nature of these devices often detracts from their use for the administration of rescue medications, where portability is important. This randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study investigated the efficacy, dose-response and safety of HFA-albuterol delivered via a breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device in comparison with the same medication delivered using a conventional P&B device. In total, 39 patients received six study treatments in a random sequence at clinic visits separated by 2-7 days: 2 puffs from a HFA-placebo Autohaler; 1, 2, or 4 puffs from a HFA-albuterol Autohaler; I or 2 puffs from a HFA-albuterol P&B. Both active inhalers delivered 90 microg albuterol base equivalent/actuation from the actuator. The change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the area under the FEV1 curve (FEV1 AUC) were significantly greater than placebo for all active treatment groups (p < or = 0.01) and were suggestive of a dose response for each inhaler. Examination of the pooled slope of the dose responses for the Autohaler and P&B using Finney's Parallel Line Bioassay Methodology found a highly statistically significant relationship indicating the equivalence of the two inhalers on both parameters (p < or = 0.002). The relative potency of the two inhalers was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.47, 1.46) for the mean change from baseline in FEV1 and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.48) for the change from baseline in FEV1 AUC. There was also a trend toward an increase in the mean percentage change from baseline in FEV1 as the number of puffs increased for both inhalers. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups with regard to time to onset of bronchodilator effect and the duration of effect was significantly greater than placebo (p < or = 0.01) in each of the active groups. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in nature and were of similar incidence (< or = 18% of patients) in each group. This study demonstrates a dose-response for HFA-albuterol on bronchodilation using both the Autohaler and P&B devices and illustrates that, in patients with good coordination of inhalation with actuation, the efficacy and safety of the two inhalers is similar at equivalent doses.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1997

[An experiment study of reversed pulmonary hypertension with inhaled nitric oxide on smoke inhalation injury].

We evaluated the effect and mechanisms of reversed pulmonary hypertension with inhaled nitric oxide (NO) on smoke inhalation injury in the dog model, 21 dogs were divided into 3 groups randomly. Following smoke inhalation, the control group (n = 8) inhaled O2 (FiO2, 0.45) and the treated group (n = 9) inhaled O2 and 0.0045% (45 ppm) NO. Hemodynamics was serially measured for 12 hours. In addition, 4 dogs without smoke inhalation were used to study the normal lung histomophologic findings. The data were analyzed by ANOVA. After inhalation of NO, the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary minute vessels pressure (Pmv), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were decreased significantly (P < 0.05), while the mean aortic pressure (mAP) and total peripheral resistance (TRP) were not remarkably changed (P > 0.05). The levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) were increased significantly (P < 0.01). Inhaled NO may reverse pulmonary hypertension with smoke inhalation injury in dogs. The mechanism of selective pulmonary circulation was increased cGMP level in smooth cells. Inhaled NO may be recommended for clinical application.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Steroid inhaler laryngitis: dysphonia caused by inhaled fluticasone therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a condition that is referred to as steroid inhaler laryngitis, a clinical entity that is caused by the use of inhaled fluticasone propionate and manifested by dysphonia, throat clearing, and fullness. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: An outpatient clinic of an academic referral center. PATIENTS: The study population consisted of 20 patients with reactive airway disease and dysphonia who were receiving inhaled fluticasone therapy and who were diagnosed as having steroid inhaler laryngitis during the period from January 1998 to June 2000. INTERVENTION: Cessation of inhaled fluticasone therapy when possible, as well as treatment of other underlying causes of dysphonia, such as laryngopharyngeal reflux and infectious processes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The resolution of dysphonia with cessation of inhaled fluticasone therapy. RESULTS: Patients with steroid inhaler laryngitis were found to have laryngeal findings ranging from mucosal edema, erythema, and thickening to leukoplakia, granulation, and candidiasis. Patients with more severe mucosal findings were more likely to have laryngopharyngeal reflux as well. Resolution of dysphonia occurred only after discontinuation of the inhaled fluticasone therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid inhaler laryngitis is a form of chemical laryngopharyngitis induced by topical steroid administration. Symptoms and physical findings mimic laryngopharyngeal reflux, but only respond completely to discontinuation of the inhaled steroid therapy. The otolaryngologist should be familiar with this cause of dysphonia.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Adrenal insufficiency in an adult on inhaled corticosteroids; recovery of adrenal function with inhaled nedocromil sodium.

BACKGROUND: Whereas oral corticosteroids and high-dose inhaled corticosteroids may be associated with suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids have not been reported to be associated with clinically significant adrenal insufficiency in the adult. OBJECTIVE: A case study of adrenal responsiveness after prolonged medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids and after replacement of steroid therapy by inhaled nedocromil sodium is described. METHODS: Standard 250-microg dose ACTH (cosyntropin) stimulation tests were followed after replacement of inhaled triamcinolone acetonide therapy by nedocromil sodium. RESULTS: A 55-year-old woman who had been on inhaled triamcinolone acetonide, 1600 microg/day for 12 years, presented with symptoms of adrenal hypofunction upon inhaled corticosteroid taper. An ACTH stimulation test confirmed adrenal insufficiency. She was switched to inhaled nedocromil sodium with improvement in her clinical syndrome and normalization of her ACTH stimulation test. CONCLUSION: Withdrawal from prolonged use of inhaled medium-dose corticosteroids may be associated with clinically significant adrenal insufficiency in adults. Steroid sparing agents may be considered for those on long-term inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1997

A comparison of low-dose inhaled budesonide plus theophylline and high-dose inhaled budesonide for moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled glucosteroids and oral theophylline are widely used to treat asthma. We compared the benefits of adding theophylline to inhaled glucosteroid with those of doubling the dose of inhaled glucosteroid in patients with persistent symptoms despite the use of inhaled glucosteroid. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 62 patients to receive either 400 microg of inhaled budesonide (low-dose budesonide) with 250 or 375 mg of theophylline (depending on body weight) or 800 microg of inhaled budesonide (high-dose budesonide). All doses were given twice daily for three months. Lung function was measured serially, and patients kept records of peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and albuterol use. The effects of treatment on endogenous cortisol levels were also assessed. RESULTS: Both treatments resulted in improvements in lung function that were sustained throughout the study. As compared with treatment with high-dose budesonide, treatment with low-dose budesonide plus theophylline resulted in greater improvements in forced vital capacity (P=0.03) and forced expiratory volume in one second (P= 0.03). There were significant and similar reductions in beta2-agonist use and the variability of peak expiratory flow, a correlate of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and the severity of asthma. Serum cortisol concentrations were significantly reduced in the group given high-dose budesonide (from a mean [+/-SE] of 18.4+/-2.4 microg per deciliter to 15.9+/-2.1 microg per deciliter, P=0.02) but were unchanged in the other group. The median serum theophylline concentration was 8.7 microg per milliliter (therapeutic range, 10 to 20) among those who received theophylline. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with moderate asthma and persistent symptoms, low-dose inhaled budesonide with theophylline and high-dose inhaled budesonide produced similar benefits. Effects were achieved at theophylline concentrations below the recommended therapeutic range. The addition of low-dose theophylline to inhaled glucosteroid may be preferable to and cheaper than increasing the dose of inhaled glucosteroid.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

Combined inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled prostacyclin during experimental chronic pulmonary hypertension.

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) and inhaled prostacyclin (PGI2) produce selective reductions in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) through differing mechanisms. NO decreases PVR via cGMP, and PGI2 produces pulmonary vasodilation via cAMP. As a general pharmacological principle, two drugs that produce similar effects via different mechanisms should have additive or synergistic effects when combined. We designed this study to investigate whether combined inhaled NO and PGI2 therapy results in additive effects during chronic pulmonary hypertension in the rat. Monocrotaline injected 4 wk before study produced pulmonary hypertension in all animals. Inhaled NO (20 parts/million) reversibly and selectively decreased pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa) with a mean reduction of 18%. Four concentrations of PGI2 were administered via inhalation (5, 10, 20, and 80 microg/ml), both alone and combined with inhaled NO. Inhaled PGI2 alone decreased Ppa in a dose-dependent manner with no change in mean systemic arterial pressure. Combined inhaled NO and PGI2 selectively and significantly decreased Ppa more did than either drug alone. The effects were additive at the lower concentrations of PGI2 (5, 10, and 20 microg/ml). The combination of inhaled NO and inhaled PGI2 may be useful in the management of pulmonary hypertension.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Similar efficacy following four weeks treatment of asthmatics with formoterol 12 micrograms b.d. delivered by two different dry powder inhalers: differences in inhaler handling.

This randomised, multicentre, parallel-group study compared the clinical efficacy and ease of handling of two dry powder inhalers delivering the long-acting beta 2-agonist formoterol. After run-in, 200 asthmatics on treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and still presenting with suboptimal asthma control were randomised to receive 12 micrograms formoterol twice daily via either the Aerolizer inhaler (Foradil Aerolizer) or the Turbuhaler inhaler (Oxis Turbuhaler) for four weeks. Study variables included the mean morning pre-medication peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last seven days of treatment and the correct inhaler handling according to inhaler-specific checklists. The mean difference in the effect on morning pre-medication PEF was 13.86 l/min in favour of formoterol via the Aerolizer inhaler (90% confidence interval 2.50, 25.21) in the intent-to-treat population. Eighty-six per cent of the patients under treatment with formoterol via the Turbuhaler inhaler performed correctly all the essential inhalation manoeuvres, whereas 98% of those on the Aerolizer inhaler did so. These results strongly suggest similar clinical efficacy with twice daily treatment of formoterol 12 micrograms metered dose delivered either by the Aerolizer, or the Turbuhaler device. They also suggest that handling the Aerolizer is easier than that of the Turbuhaler.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast in asthmatic patients using concomitant inhaled corticosteroids.

CONTEXT: For asthmatic patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids, augmenting the therapy with additional long-term control medication is advocated. Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists and leukotriene modifiers are 2 therapeutic alternatives in the long-term controller class. OBJECTIVE: To compare the addition of a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist to the addition of an oral leukotriene modifier for asthma therapy in patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids. DESIGN: Double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter clinical studies. SETTING: 54 outpatient clinical centers. PATIENTS: 429 male and female patients with asthma 12 years of age and older who were symptomatic while taking inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Salmeterol xinafoate 42 mcg via metered dose inhaler twice daily or oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, supplemental albuterol use, asthma quality of life scores, and adverse events. RESULTS: Inhaled salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function as well as significantly greater relief of both daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms compared with oral zafirlukast in patients concurrently treated with inhaled corticosteroids. The use of supplemental albuterol was reduced to a greater extent with salmeterol compared with zafirlukast. Patients treated with salmeterol showed significantly greater improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores and were satisfied with how fast, how long, and how well the medication worked compared with patients in the zafirlukast group. Both treatments were well tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma not sufficiently controlled with inhaled corticosteroids alone, the combination of inhaled salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroids is superior to the combination of oral zafirlukast and inhaled corticosteroids as stepwise therapy.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Inhaled hyperosmolar agents for bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Mucus retention in the lungs is a prominent feature of bronchiectasis. The stagnant mucus becomes chronically colonised with bacteria, which elicit a host neutrophilic response. This fails to eliminate the bacteria, and the large concentration of host-derived protease may contribute to the airway damage. The sensation of retained mucus is itself a cause of suffering, and the failure to maintain airway sterility probably contributes to the frequent respiratory infections experienced by many patients. Hypertonic saline inhalation is known to accelerate tracheobronchial clearance in many conditions, probably by inducing a liquid flux into the airway surface, which alters mucus rheology in a way favourable to mucociliary clearance. Inhaled dry powder mannitol has a similar effect. Such agents are an attractive approach to the problem of mucostasis, and deserve further clinical evaluation. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether inhaled hyperosmolar substances are efficacious in the treatment of bronchiectasis SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched, and leaders in the field contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any trial using hyperosmolar inhalation in patients with bronchiectasis not caused by cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reference were identified by the searches conducted. MAIN RESULTS: Only one trial was identified, a crossover study of 11 patients with bronchiectasis. The outcome measure was tracheobronchial clearance of a particulate radioaerosol after inhalation of dry mannitol on a single occasion, with appropriate controls. Airway clearance doubled in the central and intermediate regions of the lung, but not in the peripheral region, after mannitol administration. No side effects were observed, but two patients were premedicated with nedocromil to prevent bronchospasm. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Dry powder mannitol has been shown to improve tracheobronchial clearance in bronchiectasis, as well as cystic fibrosis, asthmatics, and normal subjects. It is not yet available for clinical use. Hypertonic saline has not been specifically tested in bronchiectasis, but improve clearance in these other conditions and in chronic bronchitis. Longer term randomised controlled studies of mannitol and hypertonic saline with clinical endpoints are now needed.

Bronchiectasis↗
PubMed1987

Evaluation of inhalation aids of metered dose inhalers in asthmatic children.

Many patients have incorrect aerosol inhalation technique with metered dose inhalers (MDI). Several inhalation aids have been developed and marketed for these patients. Even those who have correct inhalation technique may benefit from these devices. We compared bronchodilator efficacy of two puffs of albuterol aerosol administered either directly from a MDI mouthpiece, or from an inhalation aid (InspirEase, Aerochamber, Aerosol Bag) in 20 children who had previously demonstrated proper inhalation technique. The children received two puffs of aerosol from a MDI in each of two modalities tested each day on four different days (double blind). One modality contained albuterol aerosol and the other placebo. Pulmonary function was tested before and at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after treatment. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased similarly after all four modes of administration. Six patients who had incorrect inhalation technique benefited from the three inhalation aids. The aerosol bag and InspirEase produced slightly greater bronchodilator response than the Aerochamber. The inhalation aids are useful devices for those who have incorrect inhalation technique, but those who have correct technique do not derive any benefit from these devices.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Assessment of the inhalation technique in outpatients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a metered-dose inhaler or dry powder device.

Inhaled medication is commonly prescribed for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but is often not properly used by patients. A total of 316 patients suffering from asthma or COPD took part in a study that evaluated how patients utilized their metered-dose inhaler (MDI) or dry powder inhaler, using a standardized inhaler checklist. Two hundred eighty-one patients (88.9%) made at least one mistake in the inhalation technique. The mistakes were classified into skill and nonskill mistakes. Two hundred patients made one or more skill mistakes and 81 patients only made one or more nonskill mistakes. The most common skill error was "not continuing to inhale slowly after activation of the canister" (69.6%). The nonskill item most patients had difficulties with was "exhale before the inhalation" (65.8%). Patients who used an MDI made significantly fewer nonskill mistakes than patients using a dry powder device. Older patients had more difficulty with the correct use of the inhaler than younger patients. There was no difference in errors between men and women. In this patient sample, most patients failed to use their inhaler correctly. Regular instructions and checkups of inhalation technique are the responsibility of the physician and should be a standard and routine procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Anti-leukotriene (AL) agents are being considered as "add-on" therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in chronic asthma. OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and efficacy of daily AL plus ICS compared to ICS alone, and determine the corticosteroid-sparing effect of AL when added to ICS in chronic asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl (all up to 2001), reference lists of review articles and trials, contacted international headquarters of AL manufacturers and ATS meeting abstracts (1998-2000). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised placebo-controlled trials of asthmatics aged 2 years and older lasting at least one month. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted data independently. Trials were grouped by asthma control at baseline (symptomatic or well-controlled) and dose of ICS in the control group (same or double). MAIN RESULTS: Of 336 citations, 11 trials (only adults) met inclusion criteria. Six were published in full-text, eight were high quality. Daily dose of ICS was 300-2000 mcg beclomethasone-equivalent. In symptomatic adults, AL (at 2-4 times licensed dose) combined with ICS reduced the number of patients with exacerbations that required systemic corticosteroids, compared to ICS alone [Relative Risk (RR) = 0.34; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.13, 0.88]. This equates to 20 patients (95% CI 1,100 patients) treated to prevent one needing systemic corticosteroids. There was no difference in side effects. No trials tested the efficacy of licensed doses of ALs as add-on to ICS. In symptomatic adults, addition of zafirlukast to ICS did not reduce the number of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, compared to doubled dose ICS [RR= 1.39; 95% CI: 0.63, 3.08)]. There were no differences in any other measure of outcome. Higher doses of zafirlukast than currently licensed were associated with increased risk of liver enzyme elevation. In ICS-sparing trials of AL agents there was no difference in ICS dose after 12-16 weeks [Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 1.9% change; 95% CI -3.5, 7.3], and no difference in lowest tolerated dose of ICS [WMD= 44 mcg/d; 95% CI -59, 148)]. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Used as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids, high dose anti-leukotrienes reduced exacerbations, but there is no evidence to support their use at currently licensed doses. There is insufficient evidence to indicate whether they confer benefit over doubling the dose of corticosteroids. There is no evidence that they have any significant inhaled corticosteroid-sparing effect.

Administration, Inhalation↗