Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Histone Modifications”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Histone modifications accompanying the onset of developmental commitment.

In the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, three cell types comprise the 16-cell stage embryo: micromeres, macromeres, and mesomeres. We have analyzed these three cell types for nuclear proteins that were synthesized during the earliest stages of embryonic development. The most striking differences in composition of newly synthesized proteins were found between the micromeres, which are the most committed cell type, and the macromeres and mesomeres. First, the micromeres lacked triply modified forms of histone H3; the levels of doubly modified forms of H3 were also greatly reduced. In contrast, micromeres were enriched in a band which migrated at the position of unmodified, unacetylated, histone H3 protein. Second, the overall distribution of H2A histone variants differed among the three cell types. Compared with macromeres and mesomeres, micromeres had a higher ratio of alpha-stage to cleavage-stage (CS) histone H2A; the micromere nuclei were depleted by 50 and 35%, respectively, in embryonically synthesized histone CS-H2A. Third, micromeres displayed different profiles of H1 histones. (a) They contained a cleavage-stage H1 histone which migrated faster than that of macromeres and mesomeres. This protein displays the electrophoretic behavior expected for a protein with reduced levels of posttranslational covalent modification. (b) Micromeres also had reduced levels of an H1 histone (designated H1 alpha a) band found in the alpha-H1 region of macromeres and mesomeres. These changes in chromatin modification correlate with the degree of commitment of cells in the developing embryo; they may reflect differing activities of the chromatin modifying enzymes in the various cell types at the 16-cell stage. Thus, the newly synthesized chromatin proteins of the individual blastomere types already differ in the developing sea urchin by the 16-cell stage. We suggest that variations in histone subtypes and in the levels of activity of chromatin modifying enzymes, e.g., acetylases and phosphorylases, could be involved in commitment and differentiation of different cell types.

Acetylation↗

Reversible histone modifications and the chromosome cell cycle.

During the eukaryotic cell cycle, chromosomes undergo large structural transitions and spatial rearrangements that are associated with the major cell functions of genome replication, transcription and chromosome condensation to metaphase chromosomes. Eukaryotic cells have evolved cell cycle dependent processes that modulate histone:DNA interactions in chromosomes. These are; i) acetylations of lysines; ii) phosphorylations of serines and threonines and iii) ubiquitinations of lysines. All of these reversible modifications are contained in the well-defined very basic N- and C-terminal domains of histones. Acetylations and phosphorylations markedly affect the charge densities of these domains whereas ubiquitination adds a bulky globular protein, ubiquitin, to lysines in the C-terminal tails of H2A and H2B. Histone acetylations are strictly associated with genome replication and transcription; histone H1 and H3 phosphorylations correlate with the process of chromosome condensation. The subunits of histone H1 kinase have now been shown to be cyclins and the p34CDC2 kinase product of the cell cycle control gene CDC2. It is probable that all of the processes that control chromosome structure:function relationships are also involved in the control of the cell cycle.

Acetylation↗

Histone modifications in simian virus 40 and in nucleoprotein complexes containing supercoiled viral DNA.

Simian virus (SV40) nucleoprotein complexes containing circular supercoiled viral DNA were extracted from infected cells and purified by differential centrifugation. The protein content of these complexes was compared by electrophoresis on 15% acrylamide gels with the protein content of purified SV40 virions and with histones from virus-infected cells. The electrophoretic patterns of histones from each of the sources revealed several major differences. SV40 virions contained histones H3, H2B, H2A, and H4 but not H1. Nucleoprotein complexes and host cells contained all five major histone groups. Relative to cellular histones, virion and nucleoprotein complex histones were enriched 15 to 40% in histones H3 and H4. In addition to the major classes of histones, several subfractions of histones H1, H3, and H4 were observed in acrylamide gels of proteins from SV40 virions and viral nucleoprotein complexes. Acetate labeling experiments indicated that each subfraction of histones H3 and H4 had a different level of acetylation. The histones from SV40 virions and nucleoprotein complexes were acetylated to significantly higher levels than those of infected host cells. No apparent differences in phosphorylation of the major histone groups were observed.

Acetylation↗

Improved spike-in normalization clarifies the relationship between active histone modifications and transcription.

Spike-in normalization enables quantitative analysis of chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) signal. Here we introduce a robust dual spike-in normalization approach for ChIP-seq (ChIP-wrangler), optimize parameters and verify its accuracy in quantifying changes in ChIP-seq signal and detecting technical artifacts. We use ChIP-wrangler to revisit recent claims that active histone marks depend on transcription. We show that acute depletion of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) has a modest impact on H3K27ac levels, with only 6% of peaks significantly changing after RNAPII depletion, indicating that histone acetylation maintenance is not entirely dependent on ongoing transcription. Promoters and enhancers are differentially affected, with 82% of decreasing acetylation peaks located at promoter-distal elements with enhancer-related motifs. ChIP-wrangler provides increased rigor and 'guardrails' for successful spike-in normalization and, as applied here, refines the understanding of crosstalk between RNAPII activity and transcription-associated histone marks.

Histones↗