SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Thrombocytopenia is common in critically ill patients who receive heparin. However, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relatively uncommon explanation for thrombocytopenia in this patient population. This article describes clinical features of HIT and interpretation of laboratory tests for HIT antibodies from the perspective of the intensive care unit.
The incidence of cross-reactivity between unfractionated heparin and LMWH, fragmin, in patients with HIT is significantly lower (6/15, 40%) than hitherto reported in the literature. 7/9 patients with a negative cross-reactivity test were treated with dalteparin sodium (Fragmin) without any untoward events.
BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparins have been shown to be effective and safe for prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is accumulating evidence that these new anticoagulants are also effective and safe for treatment of venous thromboembolism. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to determine the effect of fixed-dose, subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins compared with adjusted-dose, intravenous or subcutaneous, unfractionated heparin for initial treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified from the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group trials register and LILACS. The reviewers contacted colleagues and representatives of pharmaceutical companies for additional information about trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing fixed-dose, subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin with adjusted-dose, intravenous or subcutaneous, unfractionated heparin in patients with venous thromboembolism. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers assessed trials for inclusion and quality, and extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen studies with a total of 4754 patients were included. By the end of follow up in ten trials, thrombotic complications occurred in 86 (4.3%) of the 1998 patients treated with low molecular weight heparin, compared with 113 (5.6%) of the 2021 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 1.01). In eight trials a reduction in thrombus size was shown by 60% treated with low molecular weight heparin and 54% treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.97). At the end of the initial treatment period, in all 14 of the trials, major haemorrhages occurred in 30 (1.3%) of the 2353 patients treated with low molecular weight heparin, compared with 51 (2.1%) of the 2401 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.93). By the end of follow up in 11 trials, 135 (6.4%) of the 2108 patients treated with low molecular weight heparin had died, compared with 172 (8.0%) of the 2137 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.99). Five studies with a total of 1636 patients examined proximal (above the knee) thrombosis; 814 treated with low molecular weight heparin and 822 with unfractionated heparin. A sub-analysis of these trials showed statistically significant reductions favouring the action of low molecular weight heparin in three areas: thrombotic complications; major haemorrhages; and overall mortality. By the end of follow up 39 (4. 8%) patients treated with low molecular weight heparin had thrombotic complications, compared with 64 (7.8%) treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0. 40 to 0.89). Major haemorrhages occurred in 8 (1.0%) treated with low molecular weight heparin, compared with 68 (8.3%) treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0. 21 to 0.95). By the end of follow up, 44 (5.4%) treated with low molecular weight heparin had died, compared with 68 (8.3%) treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.93). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as unfractionated heparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism, and significantly reduces the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at the end of follow-up. It can be adopted safely as the standard therapy for deep venous thrombosis, and studies comparing individual low molecular weight heparins are merited.
1. The ability of heparins (bovine heparin sm 1026, Av. mol. wt. 36.9 kDa and bovine heparin EP 756, Av. mol. wt. 12.9 kDa) and heparin fractions of different molecular weights (low molecular weight heparin, LMW 2123/OP, Av. mol. wt. 4.5 kDa and oligo-heparin, Av. mol. wt. 2 kDa) to inhibit the proliferation and signalling of Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts was investigated. 2. Heparin and heparin fractions of 4.5 and 2 kDa significantly inhibited DNA synthesis as monitored by [2H]-thymidine incorporation. 3. 3H-labelled heparin fractions of 4.5 and 2 kDa were prepared by gel-chromatography fractionation on Sephadex G-75 of an 3H-labelled commercial heparin after treatment with heparinase. 4. The binding of unfractionated and oligo-heparin of 2 kDa to Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts was studied; we determined the specificity of heparin and oligo-heparin binding to the cells by means of displacement of bound 3H-labelled compound in response to increasing concentrations of unlabelled compounds. Scatchard analysis of binding data obtained using [3H]-heparin as ligand revealed the presence of a single class of high affinity binding sites (Kd = 28 nM) for heparin. Scatchard analysis of binding data obtained using [3H]-oligo-heparin as ligand revealed the presence of a single class of low affinity binding sites (Kd = 3.2 microM) for oligo-heparin. 5. In addition heparin displaced [3H]-oligo-heparin at a concentration of approximately 100 fold of the Kd determined in displacement studies. Furthermore, oligo-heparin significantly displaced [3H]-heparin at a concentration of approximately 10 fold of the Kd determined by displacement studies. 6. Both heparin and oligo-heparin exert their inhibitory effects on Balb/c 3T3 DNA synthesis stimulated by PDGF or serum. However these molecules did not affect the inositol lipid turnover triggered by PDGF at a concentration which did not produce maximal response. The increase of inositol phosphate metabolism produced by 20% serum was also unaffected by heparin. This concentration of serum elicited a response comparable to that induced by a submaximal concentration of PDGF.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin with standard heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. DATA IDENTIFICATION: Studies were identified by MEDLINE search and review of bibliographies of retrieved articles. Hospital resources used in treating deep vein thrombosis and bleeding complications after total hip arthroplasty were estimated using retrospectively collected data from 447 patients who participated in a recently completed randomized controlled deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis trial at our center. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials directly comparing a low-molecular-weight heparin preparation with standard heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty were potentially eligible for the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from eligible studies were extracted independently by two of the authors. Multiple regression analysis of data from the patient cohort was used to estimate the effect of deep vein thrombosis and bleeding on length of hospital stay. A hypothetical North American price for low-molecular-weight heparin was determined based on the ratio between low-molecular-weight heparin and standard heparin in France. Costs were based on weighted per-diem hospital expenditures and physician fees for procedures and reported in 1992 U.S. dollars. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analysis of six eligible trials determined that low-molecular-weight heparin was significantly more effective than standard heparin at preventing deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty (common odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.95). However, this benefit was restricted to the prevention of proximal deep vein thrombosis (common odds ratio, 0.40; CI, 0.28 to 0.59). No significant differences were found in the rates of distal deep vein thrombosis or total, major, or minor bleeding between the two groups. Based on a 2.6 to 1 price ratio between low-molecular-weight heparin and standard heparin, use of low-molecular-weight heparin would save the health care system about $50,000 per 1000 patients treated. Sensitivity analysis shows that if the low-molecular-weight heparin/standard heparin price ratio exceeds 3.7 (the threshold value lies between 0.8 and 5.5 based on the extremes of the 95% CI of the common odds ratios for deep vein thrombosis and bleeding complications), use of low-molecular-weight heparin is more expensive. At a price ratio of 10, it would cost more than $250,000 to treat 1000 patients with low-molecular-weight heparin compared with standard heparin or about $5000 for each additional deep vein thrombosis prevented with low-molecular-weight heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective and is at least as safe as standard heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. Based on the current French price ratio of low-molecular-weight heparin to standard heparin, the use of low-molecular-weight heparin in North America would result in overall savings in cost; however, the relative cost-effectiveness is critically dependent on the price ratio between the two drugs. Further research is needed to compare the cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin with other prophylactic regimens and postoperative deep vein thrombosis management strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Laboratory and point-of-care coagulation tests are frequently obtained to determine the presence of heparin after surgical procedures. The objective of this study was (1) to compare the sensitivity of the activated coagulation time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), protamine titration (Hepcon; HMS Medtronic, Hemotec, Englewood, CO), and thromboelastography (TEG) with heparin anticoagulation and (2) to determine how frequently residual heparin is present in the 24-hour period after heparin neutralization in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) patients. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A tertiary care university teaching center that performs more than 15,000 surgical procedures per year. PARTICIPANTS: Vascular surgical (n = 17) and CPB (n = 29). INTERVENTIONS: In vascular surgical patients, coagulation tests (ACT, protamine titration [Hepcon], and TEG) were obtained before and 90 minutes after heparin (50 to 60 U/kg IV) and compared with heparin concentration determined by factor Xa inhibition assay. In cardiac surgical patients, ACT and heparin concentrations were measured after anesthesia induction, during CPB, after protamine neutralization, and 3 as well as 6 hours after CPB. In addition to heparin concentrations and ACT measures, platelet counts, fibrinogen levels, and bleeding times were determined before and 3 and 24 hours after CPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety minutes after heparin, significant heparin concentrations were present in all vascular surgical patients, but ACT was elevated in only 4 of 17 patients. Protamine titration (Hepcon) correlated with the factor Xa inhibitory assay for heparin (r2 = 0.76). All 17 patients had an abnormal TEG (mean "R" time = 81 +/- 39 minutes) and a marked elevation of aPTT (135 +/- 35 sec [normal 22 to 33 seconds]) 90 minutes after heparin. In CPB patients, ACT did not correlate with heparin assays. After protamine neutralization of heparin in CPB patients, ACT returned to baseline despite the presence of heparin in 3 of 29 patients (0.22, 0.18, and 0.33 U/mL). CONCLUSIONS: ACT was less sensitive to residual heparin anticoagulation than aPTT, TEG, and whole blood heparin assay. The whole blood heparin assay (Hepcon) provided sensitive and specific data about the presence of residual heparin. Despite the limitation of ACT in detecting heparin, the investigators found that residual heparin was not common in the period after uncomplicated CPB.
The interference of the heparin-neutralizing plasma component S protein (vitronectin) (Mr = 78,000) with heparin-catalyzed inhibition of coagulation factor Xa by antithrombin III was investigated in plasma and in a purified system. In plasma, S protein effectively counteracted the anticoagulant activity of heparin, since factor Xa inhibition was markedly reduced in comparison to heparinized plasma deficient in S protein. Using purified components in the presence of heparin, S protein induced a concentration-dependent reduction of the inhibition rate of factor Xa by antithrombin III. This resulted in a decrease of the apparent pseudo-first order rate constant by more than 10-fold at a physiological ratio of antithrombin III to S protein. S protein not only counteracted the anticoagulant activity of commercial heparin but also of low molecular weight forms of heparin (mean Mr of 4,500). The heparin-neutralizing activity of S protein was found to be mainly expressed in the range 0.2-10 micrograms/ml of high Mr as well as low Mr heparin. S protein and high affinity heparin reacted with apparent 1:1 stoichiometry to form a complex with a dissociation constant KD = 1 X 10(-8) M as determined by a functional assay. As deduced from dot-blot analysis, direct interaction of radiolabeled heparin with S protein revealed a dissociation constant KD = 4 X 10(-8) M. Heparin binding as well as heparin neutralization by S protein increased significantly when reduced/carboxymethylated or guanidine-treated S protein was employed indicating the existence of a partly buried heparin-binding domain in native S protein. Radiolabeled heparin bound to the native protein molecule as well as to a BrCN fragment (Mr = 12,000) containing the heparin-binding domain as demonstrated by direct binding on nitrocellulose replicas of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Kinetic analysis revealed that the heparin neutralization activity of S protein in the inhibition of factor Xa by antithrombin III could be mimicked by a synthetic tridecapeptide from the amino-terminal portion of the heparin-binding domain. These data provide evidence that the heparin-binding domain of S protein appears to be unique in binding to heparin and thereby neutralizing its anticoagulant activity in the inhibition of coagulation factors by antithrombin III. The induction of heparin binding and neutralization may be considered a possible physiological mechanism initiated by conformational alteration of the S protein molecule.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a relatively uncommon but severe side-effect of heparin therapy. Heparin-induced IgG antibody has been elucidated to be the main isotype and the most pathogenic antibody in the pathophysiology. As affected patients are at high risk of developing thrombotic events, confirmation of the clinical diagnosis and avoidance of heparin re-exposure are important and desirable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, heparin-induced IgG was measured by the binding of neoantigens, which were prepared by incubating FITC-heparin with platelet factor 4 present in normal serum. The cross-reactivities of heparin-induced IgG with low-molecular-weight heparin and danaparoid were analysed by competitive binding. RESULTS: A total of 81 clinically suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients were analysed. Thirty-seven of 38 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients, in whom thromboembolism was confirmed by objective methods, had elevated relative fluorescence intensity ratios (patient normal control) and 36 had positive heparin-induced platelet activation results. The prevalence of heparin-induced IgG in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients was 97.4%. Positive heparin-induced IgG results were: 0/319 healthy volunteers, 0/38 other thrombo-cytopenia and 2/56 heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin-receiving patients without thrombocytopenia, 2/41 hyperbilirubinaemic patients and 2/50 hyperlipidaemic patients. A small amount of cross-reaction assays showed similar results as obtained in heparin-induced platelet activation. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a very high frequency of heparin-induced IgG in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients can be detected using a novel antigen assay. The rapid determination of pathogenic heparin-induced IgG may be a useful tool for the rapid diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II that could facilitate further management of the patients.
Endothelial cells in vivo and in vitro take up heparin following administration. In in vitro systems, cellular and pericellular extracts of monolayers exposed to heparin, demonstrate internalization as well as cell surface attachment. To further investigate the characteristics of this exogenous heparin partitioning, we have exposed two types of endothelial cells to media containing cold and 125I labelled bovine lung, porcine mucosal or CY222 heparin. Heparin uptake, in pericellular and intracellular fractions of porcine cells, increased with concentration at 24 hrs exposure for all heparins. Only bovine heparin was preferentialy accumulated intracellularly. Cultured murine LE-II endothelial cells showed a greater accumulation in the intracellular fraction than porcine cells when exposed to porcine heparin. When bovine or CY222 heparin was administered for varying times, total heparin uptake increased with time. Heparin in the pericellular fraction was greater than intracellular at exposure durations from 5 mins to 6 hrs. At 16 hrs intracellular heparin markedly increased and far exceeded pericellular. The possibility of release of previously internalized heparin was studied by washing cultures previously exposed to heparin with heparin-free media. Heparin could be recovered up to 96 hours post exposure. A concurrent decrease in pericellular and cellular heparin was observed. These results show a differing distribution of heparin across endothelial cell membranes that is heparin source, concentration and time dependent. A previously unsuspected gradient-time mechanism is suggested. The degree of internalization differs for different endothelial cell sources. The protracted retention of heparin intracellularly by endothelial cells and subsequent release may be of therapeutic and physiological consequence.
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass with heparin-coated circuits allows reduced amounts of systemic heparin. Heparin inhibits activation of the complement cascade experimentally, but the effects of different levels of systemic heparin on activation of complement and granulocytes in patients have remained unknown. METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing coronary artery bypass procedures were studied. Cardiopulmonary bypass circuits completely coated with surface-bound heparin were used for one group given low-dose heparin (n = 17) (activated clotting time > 250 seconds), and was compared with a second group having normal high-dose heparin (activated clotting time > 480 seconds) (n = 18). A third control group was perfused with ordinary uncoated circuits and a full heparin dose (n = 17). RESULTS: During cardiopulmonary bypass, the C3 activation products C3b, iC3b, and C3c increased markedly in all three groups compared with baseline, but significantly less in the two heparin-coated groups (high dose, median maximal increase 58 arbitrary units (AU)/mL; low dose, 48 AU/mL) compared with the uncoated control group (74 AU/mL) (p < 0.01). The difference between the two coated groups was not significant. Similarly, the maximal increase in terminal SC5b-9 complement complex was considerably lower in the heparin-coated groups (high dose, 2.5 AU/mL; low dose, 2.6 AU/mL) compared with the level observed in the uncoated control group (5.3 AU/mL) (p < 0.01). The release of the granulocyte activation enzymes myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin increased from the beginning of the operation, with peak levels at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.01). The concentration of lactoferrin was significantly (p < 0.01) reduced in the low heparin dose group compared with the two other groups receiving normal high heparin doses, indicating that circulating heparin is an important granulocyte agonist, acting independently of the presence or absence of heparin-coated surfaces. Also for myeloperoxidase a higher level was observed in the high heparin dose group. CONCLUSIONS: Complement activation was significantly reduced in both heparin-coated groups and was independent of the level of systemic heparinization, whereas granulocyte activation was reduced only in patients who received low doses of systemically administered heparin. The results indicate that a moderate reduction of the systemic heparin dose may be an advantage with regard to improved biocompatibility when using heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits.
Chromogenic substrate (CS) assay of heparin may be performed with or without addition of antithrombin (AT) to the test plasma. Both types of assay are used for monitoring of heparin therapy, reflecting either heparin activity (heparin act), or heparin concentration (heparin conc) when AT is added. In plasma samples from 43 patients treated with intravenous heparin for DVT, the ratio between heparin act and heparin conc varied from 0.36 in patients with AT plasma concentration below 0.50 U/ml, to 0.85 in patients with AT above 1.00 U/ml (mean ratio 0.61). A formula expressing heparin act as a function of AT and heparin concentration in the test plasmas of the patients was used to calculate heparin act of the total material comprising 280 patients. Mean heparin act and heparin conc were both significantly correlated to clinical outcomes (bleeding complications, pulmonary embolism and phlebography score). For monitoring heparin therapy, guidelines for plasma heparin activity or concentration ("therapeutic ranges") are requested. When using a heparin act assay, the heparin dose needed in patients with low plasma AT concentration to reach a fixed therapeutic range, may imply undue risk of bleeding. On the other hand, when a heparin conc assay indicate plasma heparin conc within therapeutic range, antithrombotic activity may still be inadequate in patients with low plasma AT concentration.
OBJECTIVE: Vascular smooth muscle cells show phenotypic heterogeneity in vivo that affects the extent to which they respond to the antimitogenic effects of heparin. In vitro, heparin-resistant cells are readily selected. This study was undertaken to determine whether differences in the antiproliferative response to heparin involve differences in activity of heparin-sensitive signal transduction pathways. METHODS: Rat thoracic aorta smooth muscle cells (ASMC) at early passage together with two established vascular smooth muscle lines, PAC-1 and A10, were examined before and after selection for growth in the presence of heparin (10 micrograms/ml). Cells were rendered quiescent and then stimulated with serum. RESULTS: The three cell types showed different sensitivities to the antimitogenic effects of heparin. With respect to [3H]thymidine incorporation, A10 cells were insensitive to 1 microgram/ml heparin whereas PAC-1 cells responded down to 0.05 microgram/ml and ASMC were of intermediate sensitivity. ASMC and PAC-1 cells but not A10 showed a decrease in c-fos mRNA in response to 1 microgram/ml heparin, and a decrease in the c-Fos content of AP-1 DNA binding activity. None of the cells had decreased c-jun mRNA in the presence of heparin. Although induction of c-fos by serum is thought to signal through the Erk mitogen activated protein kinase family, Erk activity was decreased more by 1 microgram/ml heparin in A10 cells than in PAC-1 or ASMC. When cells were selected by growth in the presence of 10 micrograms/ml heparin, A10 cells were unaffected but PAC-1 and ASMC showed a blunted effect of heparin on serum stimulation. In contrast to A10 and their controls not exposed to continuous heparin, heparin-selected PAC-1 and ASMC showed a diminished ability to induce c-fos in response to serum. CONCLUSIONS: Smooth muscle cell lines show different responses to the antimitogenic effects of heparin that correlate with the heparin sensitivity of c-Fos/c-Jun expression. Although Erk is implicated in c-fos induction, cells comparatively resistant to heparin still show heparin-dependent inhibition of Erk activation, suggesting that other pathways may be more important for heparin resistance. Furthermore, cells selected for heparin resistance may develop c-fos-independent pathways for proliferation.
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the efficacy and safety of a low-molecular-weight heparin were compared with those of unfractionated sodium heparin (standard heparin) in 136 patients who had elective total hip replacement. The patients received subcutaneous injection of either 5000 international units of low-molecular-weight heparin once daily or 5000 international units of standard heparin three times a day. Treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin began twelve hours before the operation, and treatment with standard heparin began two hours preoperatively; both regimens were continued for ten days. Twelve days postoperatively, bilateral ascending phlebography was performed in 122 patients, sixty-three in the treatment group that received low-molecular-weight heparin and fifty-nine in the treatment group that received standard heparin. Pulmonary scintigraphy was performed in 127 patients. Deep-vein thrombosis was diagnosed in forty-four patients: nineteen (30 per cent) of the sixty-three who received low-molecular-weight heparin and twenty-five (42 per cent) of the fifty-nine who received standard heparin. All but four patients, two from each treatment group, were asymptomatic. The difference in the total rate of thrombosis in the two groups was not significant (p = 0.189). However, thrombosis occurred in the thigh in only six (10 per cent) of the patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin but in eighteen (31 per cent) of those who received standard heparin, a significant difference (p = 0.011). Pulmonary embolism was detected in twenty-seven patients: eight (12.3 per cent) of those who received low-molecular-weight heparin and nineteen (30.6 per cent) of those who received standard heparin. Only three patients had clinical signs of embolism. Pulmonary embolism was significantly more frequent in the group that received standard heparin (p = 0.016). Total loss of blood and the total amount of blood that was transfused were significantly reduced in the patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin compared with those who received standard heparin. Prophylaxis was not discontinued because of hemorrhage in any patient. The efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin was superior to that of standard heparin in the prevention of femoral thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, although the over-all incidence of deep-vein thrombosis was not statistically different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Perioperative monitoring has demonstrated that administration of heparin on an empirical basis is associated with a wide variation in patient response and elimination rate. This problem may be overcome by intervention on the basis of perioperative monitoring or by using forms of heparin with different pharmacokinetic properties. When compared with unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin has a higher bioavailability after subcutaneous administration, a linear clearance mechanism with a prolonged half-life, and is at least as effective in preventing postoperative vein thrombosis. Theoretically these characteristics of low-molecular-weight heparin could lead to more predictable levels of heparin activity. In this study we compared the pharmacokinetics of low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin after an intravenous injection in patients undergoing aortic graft surgery. Heparin activity was measured before heparin administration and at 5, 20, 35, 50, 65, 80, 95, and 110 minutes after administration. The anti-Xa activity in the low-molecular-weight heparin group showed less variation and was more sustained when compared to the unfractionated heparin group. Fibrin degradation products were moderately correlated with the anti-factor Xa levels of the low-molecular-weight heparin group, but no correlation was found in the unfractionated heparin group. The anti-factor Xa activity of low-molecular-weight heparin was, in contrast to that of unfractionated heparin, not completely reversible by protamine administration. The blood loss was comparable in both groups. In contrast to what was expected, the pharmacokinetic profiles of low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin showed a similarity after intravenous injection in patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass grafting. Factors that could have influenced the pharmacokinetic behavior of heparin are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy and safety of low molecular weight (LMW) heparin (Enoxaparin) compared with standard calcium heparin for the prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. PATIENTS: Six hundred sixty-five consecutive patients undergoing hip replacement at five participating hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either fixed-dose LMW heparin, 30 mg subcutaneously twice daily, or fixed-dose standard calcium heparin, 7500 units subcutaneously twice daily; both regimens were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 14 days or until discharge if sooner. MEASUREMENTS: All patients had postoperative I-125-fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. If results of one or both tests were positive, then venography was done. Otherwise, venography was done between day 10 and day 14, or sooner if the patient was ready for discharge. RESULTS: Evaluable venograms were obtained in 258 of the 333 patients randomly assigned to receive LMW heparin and in 263 of the 332 patients assigned to receive calcium heparin. For patients with evaluable venograms, thrombosis was detected in 50 patients (19.4%) who received LMW heparin compared with 61 patients (23.2%) who received standard heparin (difference, -3.8%; 95% CI, -11.1% to 3.6%) (P greater than 0.2). Proximal deep vein thrombosis was detected in 5.4% of the patients receiving LMW heparin and in 6.5% of the patients receiving standard heparin (difference, -1.1%; CI, - 5.2% to 3.3%) (P greater than 0.2). For the entire group of 665 patients, venous thrombosis occurred in 17.1% given LMW heparin and in 19.0% given standard heparin. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 31 patients (9.3%) given standard heparin and in 17 patients (5.1%) given LMW heparin (difference, 4.2%; CI, 0.3% to 8.2%) (P = 0.035). The relative risk reduction was 45%. The rate of major bleeding in the standard heparin group was 5.7% compared with 3.3% in the LMW heparin group (difference, 2.4%; CI, -1.0% to 5.4%) (P = 0.13). The relative risk reduction was 42%. CONCLUSION: Low molecular weight heparin is significantly less hemorrhagic than standard unfractionated heparin; the difference in the rate of deep vein thrombosis, although not statistically significant (P greater than 0.2), favors the use of LMW heparin.
BACKGROUND: Colorectal surgery implies higher risk of postoperative thromboembolic complications as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) than general surgery. The best prophylaxis in general surgery is heparin and graded compression stockings. No systematic review on combination prophylaxis or on thrombosis prophylaxis in colorectal surgery has been published. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of postoperative thromboembolism after colorectal surgery using prophylactic methods focussing on heparins and mechanical methods alone and in combinations. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE back to 1970. Abstract books from major congresses were handsearched as were reference lists from previously performed reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCT or CCT comparing prophylactic interventions and/or placebo. Outcomes were ascending venography, 125 I-fibrinogen uptake test, ultrasound methods, pulmonary scintigraphy. Studies, using thermographic methods, other isotopic methods, plethysmographic methods, and purely clinical methods as the only diagnostic measure were excluded. 558 studies were identified - 477 were excluded. Only 3 of the identified studies focused exclusively on colorectal surgery. Studies of general surgery contain considerable numbers of colorectal patients. The authors of 66 studies in general and/or abdominal surgery were contacted for retrieving the results from the colorectal patients. Answers were received from very few. 19 studies entered this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All studies and all data extraction were performed independently by at least two of the authors. Outcome was deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. Analysis of bleeding complications were unfeasible. 12 meaningful outcomes were analysed by means of the fixed effects model with Peto Odds Ratios. MAIN RESULTS: Heparins versus no treatment: Any kind of heparincompared to no treatment or placebo (comparison 07.03, 11 studies). Heparin is better in preventing DVT and/or PE with a Peto Odds ratio at 0.32 (95% Confidence Interval 0.20-0.53) Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (comparison 08.03, 4 studies). The two treatments were found equally effective in preventing DVT and/or PE with a Peto Odds ratio 1.01 (95% Confidence Interval 0.67-1.52). Mechanical methods (comparison 10.3, 2 studies). The combination of graded compression stockings and LDH is better than LDH alone in preventing DVT and/or PE with a Peto Odds ratio at 4.17 (95% Confidence Interval 1.37-12.70). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The optimal prophylaxis in colorectal surgery is the combination of graduated compression stockings and low-dose unfractionated heparin. The unfractionated heparin can be replaced with low molecular weight heparin.
BACKGROUND: Because previous reports suggest that the linear relationship between celite activated clotting time (ACT) values and heparin sodium is disrupted if values exceed 500 to 600 seconds, this study was designed to evaluate the relationship of kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) values to high in vitro heparin concentrations. In addition, the relationship of kaolin ACT to heparin concentration as determined manually was compared with that obtained with an automated heparin dose response assay. METHODS: Blood specimens were obtained prior to and after heparin administration from 41 cardiac surgical patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass in this institutional human studies committee-approved study. Five ACT instruments were used to evaluate the response of kaolin ACT to manually added heparin at two anticoagulation levels: low range (ACT values of less than 500 seconds) and high range (ACT values of 500 seconds or greater). Specimens were also used to measure kaolin ACT values at three heparin concentrations with an automated heparin dose response assay (HDR) using a Hepcon instrument. RESULTS: A greater response of kaolin ACT to heparin was seen with high-range ACT values than low-range ACT values as illustrated by greater (p = 0.002) mean slope values (low range, 99 +/- 30 s/U/ mL; high range, 128 +/- 50 s/U/ml). Good correlations were obtained between heparin concentration and either low- or high-range ACT values as demonstrated by mean correlation coefficients (low range, 0.992; high range 0.982). The response of low-range kaolin ACT values to heparin was greater than that obtained with the automated heparin dose response assay as illustrated by greater (p = 0.005) mean slope values (low range, 99 +/- 30 s/U/mL; HDR, 82 +/- 21 s/U/mL). Good correlations were observed for the relationship between heparin and ACT values obtained with the HDR assay (r = 0.998). CONCLUSIONS: A variable response of kaolin ACT to heparin among patients was demonstrated in our study, especially when ACT values exceeded 500 seconds. We found that the response of kaolin ACT to higher heparin concentrations was acceptable for clinical monitoring based on good correlations obtained in individual patients. The HDR assay generally overestimates a patient's heparin requirements; most likely, this is due to a lower response of kaolin ACT to heparin concentration that is reflected in this assay. Because and exceptional correlation can be obtained between kaolin ACT values and heparin concentration using the assay, this automated assay can identify heparin-resistant patients who may need further treatment.
The binding of unfractionated heparin to endothelium is thought to be responsible for the rapid and saturable phase of unfractionated heparin clearance. Thrombin can induce endothelial cells to express and/or secrete a number of heparin binding proteins that have the potential to increase the binding of unfractionated heparin and to a lesser extent the binding of low molecular weight heparin. To explore this possibility, we examined the binding of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin to thrombin-activated endothelial cells. Cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used to determine the binding of 125I-labeled unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin to untreated and to thrombin-activated cells. After thrombin treatment, we obtained a time-dependent increase in the binding of radio-labeled unfractionated heparin. In contrast, there was much less binding of low molecular weight heparin, and a time-dependent increase was not apparent. After 30, 45, and 60 minutes of thrombin treatment, the binding of unfractionated heparin was significantly higher than that of low molecular weight heparin. The increase in binding of unfractionated heparin to thrombin-activated cells also was demonstrated using fluorescently labeled unfractionated heparin followed by fluorescence microscopy. The average fluorescence intensity of thrombin-treated cells increased by 44% when compared with resting cells. The present results indicate that thrombin can increase the binding of unfractionated heparin to human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Thus, an activated endothelium may contribute to the variability of the anticoagulant response to unfractionated heparin. In contrast, the binding of low molecular weight heparin is much less affected, which may account for its better bioavailability and longer half-life.