Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Gynecologic Surgery”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

[Effects of perioperative music on sedation in patients undergoing gynecological surgery under intravertebral anesthesia].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of music on propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) in patients during gynecological surgery under intravertebral anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients scheduled for gynecological surgery under intravertebral anesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups. The music group patients were asked to determine music and its sound volume preoperatively, which were played from 6 min before the surgery to the end. A loading dose of 1 microg/kg fentanyl and 0.5 mg/kg propofol was administered intravenously to all the patients 5 min prior to operation. At the beginning of surgery, the TCI of propofol was initiated at propofol target controlled concentration of 2 microg/ml, which was modulated at a grade of 0.2 microg/ml every 10 min to maintain an observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score of 3 intraoperatively. Induction time of sedation, intraoperative amount of propofol and patient's satisfaction of sedation were assessed. RESULTS: (1) The music group patients had a significant shorter induction time of sedation (12 min +/- 12 min) than the controls (18 min +/- 12 min) (P < 0.01). (2) The music group patients had a significant less propofol target-controlled concentration (1.6 microg/ml +/- 0.3 microg/ml) and delivers (171 mg +/- 98 mg) than the controls (2.4 microg/ml +/- 0.4 microg/ml and 251 mg +/- 92 mg) (both P < 0.01). (3) The music group patients had a significant higher satisfaction (9.7 +/- 0.6) than the controls (8.1 +/- 1.0) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Music has perfect sedative effects in patients undergoing gynecological surgery under intravertebral anesthesia.

Adult↗

A randomized controlled trial of early versus "traditional" postoperative oral intake after major abdominal gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare early oral intake and the traditional timing of feeding after major gynecologic surgery and the effects on the length of hospital stay. STUDY DESIGN: Gynecologic oncology and urogynecology patients who underwent major abdominal gynecologic surgery were prospectively randomized to 1 of 2 groups. The traditional feeding group (group A, 49 patients) received nothing by mouth until documentation of bowel function. They were then advanced slowly to solid diet. The patients allocated to the early feeding regimen (group B, 47 patients) began clear fluids on the first postoperative day. Once 500 mL of clear fluid was tolerated, they received a regular diet. The groups were compared with regard to length of hospital stay, postoperative day that solids were tolerated, and the incidence of adverse effects. Statistical analyses were performed with the chi(2) test, the Fisher exact test, the Student t test, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. There was a statistically significant reduction in the length of hospital stay for those patients on the early feeding regimen. The median length of stay for group A was 6.0 days and for group B was 4.0 days (P =.0001). There was no difference in the incidence of emesis, ileus, or other postoperative complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative dietary advancement after major abdominal gynecologic surgery results in a decreased length of hospital stay and appears to be safe, with no increased adverse effects.

Abdomen↗

Effect of presurgical local infiltration of levobupivacaine in the surgical field on postsurgical wound pain in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

BACKGROUND: To maintain a high standard of patient care, it is essential to provide adequate pain management in patients who undergo laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: We randomly enrolled 74 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for gynecological benign diseases. Patients in the levobupivacaine group (n=37) were injected with 7 ml of 5 mg/ml levobupivacaine at all incisional areas patients in the control group (n=37) were injected with an equal volume of physiologic saline solution. In the postoperative period the following variables were assessed for each group: decline of hemoglobin concentration, consumption of analgesics, time of ambulation, length of postoperative ileus, length of postoperative hospital stay, and VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: Mean pain intensity at 6 and 12 h after surgery was significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group than in the control group (p<0.01). Analgesic requirement was significantly lower (p<0.01) in the levobupivacaine group (0.3 phial+/-0.2) than in the control group (2.1 phial+/-1.0). The mean time of ambulation was significantly lower (p<0.05) in the levobupivacaine group (16+/-4) than in the control group (22+/-6). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in mean pain intensity 24 h after surgery, decline of hemoglobin concentration, length of postoperative ileus, or length of postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that presurgical infiltration of levobupivacaine in addition to general anesthesia and standard analgesic therapy significantly decreases the intensity of postsurgical pain, especially for the first 12 h after surgery, and reduces analgesic consumption after surgery.

Adolescent↗

Effect of propofol for induction and ondansetron with or without dexamethasone for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after major gynecologic surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that for major gynecologic surgery the combination of propofol for induction, ondansetron, and dexamethasone would be a more effective antiemetic combination than propofol for induction, ondansetron, and saline; and to determine if a propofol induction of anesthesia improved our previously reported results when thiamylal was the induction drug. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PATIENTS: 80 healthy ASA physical status I, II, and III female inpatients scheduled for major gynecologic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: After induction of anesthesia with propofol, Group 1 received intravenous (IV) ondansetron 4 mg and saline, and Group 2 received IV ondansetron 4 mg followed by IV dexamethasone 20 mg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For Group 1 and Group 2, respectively, no emesis and no rescue occurred in 15 (37.5%) and 21 (52.5%) patients (p = 0.13); emesis occurred in 7 (17.5%) Group 1 patients and 5 (12.5%) Group 2 patients, rescue antiemetic 23 (57.5%) Group 1 patients and 19 (47.5%) Group 2 patients. Nausea was reported by 31 (77.5%) Group 1 patients and 30 (75%) Group 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that the addition of dexamethasone to the propofolondansetron combination would significantly reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was not confirmed. A propofol induction of anesthesia resulted in a comparable incidence of PONV when compared with our previously reported results using thiamylal for induction of anesthesia for women having major gynecologic operations.

Adolescent↗

Unscheduled hospital admission following ambulatory gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To identify causes of unscheduled admission following ambulatory gynecologic surgery. METHODS: We compared each patient admitted on an unscheduled basis with two patients who did not require admission. Thirty demographic and clinical factors were evaluated by univariate analysis. Significant factors (P less than .05) were then analyzed using multivariate stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: During a 4-year period, 90 patients required unscheduled admission. This represented 3.64% of 2470 patients who underwent ambulatory gynecologic surgery. Factors associated with admission by multivariate analysis included: 1) previous abdominal surgery, 2) significant medical illnesses, 3) preoperative hemoglobin concentration, 4) general anesthesia, 5) procedure length, and 6) blood loss. Sensitivity was 60.0%, specificity was 90.6%, and the overall correct rate of prediction was 80.4%. Postoperative emesis, the most common reason for unscheduled admissions, occurred in 23.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Previous abdominal surgery and significant medical illnesses are factors that cannot be altered preoperatively. The need for general anesthesia, procedure length, and blood loss are functions of the procedure and cannot be easily modified. Postoperative emesis may warrant further investigation. Successful antiemetic therapy may reduce unscheduled admissions.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

The mons pubis: an excellent graft donor site in gynecologic surgery.

Split-thickness skin grafting has many applications in gynecologic surgery. Selection of the donor site is an aspect of the procedure that is very important for preventing highly visible lifelong scars. In this regard the mons pubis is an excellent choice as a donor site. Scar visibility is minimized by regrowth of the pubic hair. Another advantage is the anterior location of the mons, which allows for healing without constant pressure in patients who must remain supine in the postoperative period. Graft harvesting requires shaving the mons pubis and injecting saline solution into the subcutaneous tissue to elevate the skin and thus provide a firm flat base for dermatome application. Hair growth does not occur in the recipient site because the hair follicles are not harvested. Healing of both donor and recipient sites has been excellent with minimal discomfort during pubic hair regrowth. Thus it is recommended that the mons pubis be given serious consideration as a graft donor site in gynecologic surgery.

Carcinoma in Situ↗

Comparison of lornoxicam with tramadol in patient-controlled analgesia after gynecological surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lornoxicam and tramadol in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after gynecological surgery. METHODS: Forty-four patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups after elective gynecological surgery. Patients in group I (n = 22) received IV tramadol, and group II patients (n = 2) received IV lornoxicam with a PCA pump. A visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), hemodynamic parameters and side-effects were assessed before starting the infusion (baseline), at the 15th and 30th min, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 36th and 48th hour thereafter, and results were compared. RESULTS: Adequate analgesia was achieved in both groups. VAS values in the tramadol group were lower than those of lornoxiacam at the 15th and 30th minute, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th and 12th hour measurements (p < 0.05). Eight patients (36.3%) in group I and six patients (27.2%) in group II suffered from nausea (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tramadol and lornoxicam may be used for pain control after gynecological surgery via PCA. However, we conclude that tramadol has better analgesic efficacy than lornoxicam during the first 12 hours postoperatively.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗

An assessment of the value of frozen sections in gynecological surgery.

In 203 consecutive gynecological operations where frozen sections were performed, 35.6% were from conditions of the ovary, 22.7% from the cervix, 18.2% from the endometrium, and 11.4% from the vulva. There were 0.5% false-positive, 1.0% false-negative and 2.0% deferred diagnosis. Incorrect interpretation was the cause of the single false-positive diagnosis, while the false-negative diagnoses were due to errors in block selection. The deferred diagnoses mainly occurred in gynecological conditions where diagnosis was difficult, required extensive sampling or a formal mitotic count. As in other surgical fields, gynecological frozen sections were used principally to guide the extent of surgery. The most valuable frozen sections were in those instances where the operation was affected most. These were on lymph nodes in cases of carcinoma of the vulva and cervix, myometrial lesions in young women where myomectomy was being considered, and ovarian tumours to distinguish primary from secondary tumours. Occasionally, frozen sections were also found useful to establish margins of vulval and cervical tumours, in hysterectomy specimens of endometrial carcinomas to determine prognostic factors, and in suspected recurrences and metastases of tumours to determine the adequacy of the biopsy material. Frozen sections in obviously benign conditions, e.g., ovarian cysts without papillary or solid areas, were found to be unnecessary. Frozen sections are contraindicated when only a small amount of crucial material is available, as the paraffin diagnosis may be compromised. Pathologists should have a clear idea of the role of frozen sections in gynecological surgery and work closely with the surgeon in the management of gynecological oncology patients.

Fallopian Tube Diseases↗

[Defibrotide in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in gynecologic surgery. A controlled study versus calcium heparin in 120 patients].

The efficacy of defibrotide and calcium heparin in the prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in gynecological surgery were compared in a randomized study. Seventy patients candidate to gynecological surgery (for benign conditions) and 50 candidate to surgery for malignancies were randomly allocated either to defibrotide (400 mg b.i.d. IM from the day before operation to the 7th postoperative day, n = 60) or to calcium heparin (5000 IU t.i.d. SC from the operation to the 7th postoperative day, n = 70). The diagnosis of DVT was made with impedance plethysmography and if necessary confirmed with phlebography. No patient developed established DVT in either groups and no adverse reactions were observed. These results indicate that defibrotide may be considered as an alternative to heparin in the DVT prophylaxis in gynecological surgery.

Female↗

Influence of standardized orders on postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after gynecologic surgery remains high, despite effective prophylactic medications. Thus, the objectives of this study were to determine whether standardized orders for the prophylaxis and treatment of PONV in gynecologic surgery patients (1) reduce PONV occurrence, (2) reduce total costs, and (3) influence the choice of medications used for PONV prophylaxis and treatment. METHODS: A retrospective design was employed in which a random sample of 200 patients was selected from each of the two 6-month phases before (pre) and after (post) the implementation of standardized orders for PONV prophylaxis and treatment. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any PONV episode. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounding factors. All costs were in 1999 Canadian dollars (Canadian dollar = US$0.673 in 1999). RESULTS: Characteristics were similar except for surgical and anesthesia length between phases. The proportion of patients who received PONV prophylaxis increased from 31% (pre) to 47% (post; p = 0.002). There was a reduction in the risk of a PONV event in the post-phase (odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.97; p = 0.04). The risk of PONV was significantly reduced with the administration of prophylactic medications (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.67; p = 0.001). There was a reduction in the mean number of PONV episodes in the post-phase (1.47 events) versus the pre-phase (1.81 events; p = 0.02). A reduction in mean PONV management costs was observed in the post-phase ($8.31, SD +/- 8.50) compared with the pre-phase ($10.23, SD +/- 8.25; p = 0.02). For mean prophylactic costs, these were significantly higher in the postimplementation phase compared with the preimplementation phase ($1.64, SD +/- 3.36 vs. $0.91, SD +/- 2.43; p = 0.013). For mean total PONV costs (prophylaxis plus management costs), there was a nonsignificant reduction in the postimplementation phase compared with the preimplementation phase ($9.95, SD +/- 9.20 vs. $11.15, SD +/- 8.51, respectively; p = 0.18). Univariate sensitivity analyses revealed that the economic results were sensitive to several parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of preprinted order forms for PONV prophylaxis and treatment appears to be an effective and economically attractive strategy.

Antiemetics↗

HSK21542 for Postoperative Analgesia in Gynecological Surgery: A Pooled Post-Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative pain management in gynecological surgery is challenging because of complex visceral-somatic pain interactions and the adverse effects of conventional analgesics. HSK21542, a novel peripherally restricted kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist that selectively targets visceral pain pathways enriched with KORs, may provide adequate analgesia without systemic adverse events. METHODS: We conducted a pooled post-hoc analysis of data from two phase III, multicenter, triple-blinded, randomized controlled trials (Study 301, HSK21542 vs placebo; Study 303, HSK21542 vs tramadol vs placebo). Eligible patients undergoing elective gynecological surgery were included. The primary outcome was the summed pain-intensity difference over 12 and 24 hours (SPID 12h and SPID 24h ). Secondary outcomes were pain-relief quality (proportion of patients relieved from severe pain with a pain numerical rating score &#x2264; 3 between 0 and 24 hours) and rescue-analgesic requirements (number of doses and time to first rescue analgesic). Adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were analyzed: 150 received HSK21542, 139 received a placebo, and 81 received tramadol. After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment, baseline characteristics were well-balanced across treatment groups (all standardized mean differences [SMD] <0.1; see Table 1 for 95% CIs). HSK21542 produced greater reductions in pain intensity over 12 and 24 hours than placebo (least-squares mean differences -8.1 and -16.3 for SPID 12h and SPID 24h , respectively. Both P < .001) and no statistically significant difference was observed between HSK21542 and tramadol ( P > .05). Significantly more patients in the HSK21542 group were relieved from severe pain at 0 to 12 hours (92.7% vs 82.7%, P < .001) and required fewer rescue doses at 0 to 12 hours (0.00 [IQR 0.00-1.00] vs 1.00 [IQR 0.00-2.00], P < .001) and 0 to 24 hours (0.00 [IQR 0.00-1.00] vs 1.00 [IQR 0.00-2.00], P < .001) than those in the placebo group, whereas no significant differences with tramadol both in 0 to 12 and 0 to 24 hours. HSK21542 was also associated with significantly lower incidences of nausea (24.7% vs 66.7%) and vomiting (21.3% vs 60.5%) than tramadol. Only one case of dizziness occurred in the tramadol group. CONCLUSIONS: HSK21542 could provide adequate postoperative analgesia with few adverse events in patients undergoing gynecological surgery.

Humans↗

Morbidity and mortality rates of elective gynecologic surgery in the elderly woman.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in elderly women who undergo gynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The charts of 54 consecutive women ages 70 to 85 years who underwent major gynecologic surgery between June 1998 and November 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age was 76.7 years. Fifty procedures (92.6%) were performed for pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence. Forty-nine of the procedures were performed vaginally, and 27 of the procedures (50%) were performed with the use of general anesthesia. Postoperative cardiac complications occurred in five patients (10%), including three myocardial infarctions, two of which were fatal. Other complications included benign cardiac arrhythmias in two patients, slow return of gastrointestinal function in five patients (9.3%), and transient mental status changes in four patients (7.4%). The mean length of stay was 4 days. CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications occurred infrequently among elderly women who underwent gynecologic surgery. Although age alone is not a contraindication to elective surgery, there may be increased risks for geriatric women.

Age Factors↗

Improved bowel function after gynecological surgery with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl than bupivacaine-morphine infusion.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative gastrointestinal recovery between continuous epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-morphine. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized, prospective trial, 60 women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer were studied. Anesthesia was provided by a combined general/epidural (L2-3 catheter) technique without epidural opioids. Postoperative epidural analgesia was by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% with either morphine 0.05 mg x ml(-1) (BM) or fentanyl 5 microg x ml(-1) (BF). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and during movement, and the return of bowel function were collected for three days and the duration of hospitalization were noted. RESULTS: On POD-1, 18.5% of patients in the BM group had emesis compared with none in the BF group (P = 0.038) and fewer patients in the BM group tolerated clear oral fluids (11.1% BM vs 40.6% BF, P = 0.025). These differences became insignificant on POD-2 and 3. Median pain scores were comparable at rest and ranged from 10-20 in the BM group vs 0-20 in the BF group over the three days. Similarly, median pain scores with movement respectively ranged from 20-25 and 20-30 in the BF and BM groups. The mean duration of hospitalization was longer in the BM group (5.7 +/- 2.4) vs BF (4.5 +/- 1.2 days), P = 0.017. CONCLUSION: Epidural BM and BF provided equally effective postoperative analgesia at rest and during movement. Compared with BM, epidural BF is associated with less emesis and an increased ability to tolerate oral fluids on POD-1 and an overall shorter hospital stay.

Adult↗

Postoperative pulmonary complications after gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the frequency of, and risks for postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery for non-malignant gynecologic disorders. METHOD: A retrospective component included medical record data for one year. A prospective component enrolled 300 patients consecutively who were scheduled for gynecologic surgeries. RESULT: Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 1.22% of 328 open abdominal procedures in the retrospective study, and 2.16% of 232 in the prospective study. Pooling the data yielded a frequency estimate of 1.61%. Mean hospital length of stay (pooled data) increased 1.75 days in those with postoperative pulmonary complications. Smoking was the only significant risk factor (relative risk=3.9 using pooled data). CONCLUSION: Postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery for non-malignant gynecologic disorders are infrequent but increase hospital length of stay. Smokers are at increased risk.

Adult↗

[ Ambulatory laparoscopic gynecological surgery in Africa: feasibility].

We report a prospective survey conduced between March 1998 and February 1999 among 100 women classes ASA I and II who underwent laparoscopic surgery for gynecological disorders under general anesthesia. Among these laparoscopies 85 (85%) were performed for operative purposes and 12 (10.7%) for diagnostic purposes. Minimal monitoring was used (no capnography) so prophylacti fluid loading with 0.9% saline was used before insufflation to reduce hemodynamic changes induced by abdominal overpressure and to avoid potential massive air embolism. Insufflation pressure was limited to 14 mmHg. The main agent used for all procedures was propofol. Mean duration of the procedures was 55 minutes. There were no cases of complications or delayed recovery. Complete exsufflation by abdominal compression at the end of the procedures induced minimal abdominal pain and scapulalgia. Ketoprofen as effective postoperatively. Twenty-five patients (25%) complained of nausea and vomiting in the recovery room and were treated effectively with metoclopramide. All patients were discharged and accompanied to their home six hours later after a well-tolerated light meal. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Adult↗