Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “General Practitioners”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

[The Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline "Dizziness"; reaction from a general practitioner's perspective].

The Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline entitled 'Dizziness' concerns a complaint experienced by many people, yet it provides few scientific data to support the recommendations. The standard does, however, provide the general practitioner with some concrete advice: the diagnostic work-up should, in the first instance, aim to differentiate vertigo from other forms of dizziness, and medicinal treatment is not indicated as it has not been proven to be effective. However, when it comes to further diagnostic procedures and non-medicinal therapy, the standard tends to list options and give less direction.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed1989

General practitioners' referrals to specialist outpatient clinics. I. Why general practitioners refer patients to specialist outpatient clinics.

There has been much concern about the wide variations in general practitioners' referral rates and the consequent implications for cost and quality of care. This has led to a call to evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of referrals. A collaborative audit of referrals to outpatient clinics was conducted by 127 general practitioners in 33 practices in the Oxford region. Records were kept of 18,754 referrals, which included data on diagnoses and reasons for referral. Overall, 6553 (35.4%) of the referrals were for particular treatments or operations and a further 6475 (34.9%) were for specific investigation or diagnosis. Advice on management was the main reason for referral in 2656 (14.3%) cases, and in 1719 (9.3%) cases the general practitioners wanted the consultants to take over managing their patients. Reassurance of either the general practitioner or the patient was recorded as the main reason in only 762 (4.1%) referrals. There seems to be scope for rationalising the referral process. A programme with three stages for evaluating referrals to outpatient clinics is recommended.

England↗
PubMed2004

New Zealand Rural General Practitioners 1999 Survey--Part 3: rural general practitioners speak out.

AIMS: To describe themes about rural general practice from the written responses in the 'New Zealand Rural GPs 1999 Survey'. METHODS: A postal questionnaire surveyed all rural general practitioners (GPs) in New Zealand (NZ), who were asked for comments or suggestions about rural general practice. These responses were explored for themes about rural practice. RESULTS: Of 338 completed questionnaires (response rate--75%), 138 contained written responses. The positive themes of rural general practice included: forming strong relationships with patients and the community, and practising the full spectrum of general practice, including emergency medicine. The negative themes included: heavy workloads, frequent on-call, inability to get time off, and feeling undervalued and underpaid by funders. Retention solutions included: better pay to adequately reflect the skills and workload, more salaried positions with guaranteed working conditions, and better rural continuing education. Recruitment solutions included: reducing barriers for foreign doctors to enter NZ, establishing a rural GP career pathway, and increasing the number of rural registrars. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights both the positive and negative features of NZ rural general practice, and makes it clear that further concerted and sustained action is required to improve retention and recruitment. The GPs' written comments provide detail on the challenges facing rural general practice, as well as informed comment about potential solutions.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1994

Assessing the competence of general practitioners in diagnosing generalized anxiety disorder using standardized patients.

The competence of general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing anxiety neurosis was assessed using standardized patients (SPs) unknown to the doctors. Out of a computer-generated random sample of 100 general practitioners in Kuala Lumpur, 42 volunteered to participate in the study. The results showed that the GPs can be divided into three groups: group A made the correct diagnosis and informed the SPs about their condition (11.9%); group B prescribed tranquillizers and did not inform the SPs of the actual diagnosis but instead said that they were either normal or were suffering from some stress (28.6%); and group C made various diagnoses of physical disorder or did not detect any abnormality at all (59.5%). Thus about 40% of the doctors considered an emotion-related disorder and only 12% of the doctors were confident enough to make and inform the patient of the actual diagnosis. Group A significantly (P < 0.001) asked higher numbers of relevant questions in the signs and symptoms section of the history than the other two groups. No differences between the three groups were observed in the other two sections of history-taking (personality, family, social and precipitating factors), in the general and specific physical examination and interpersonal skills. Generally, with the exception of the interpersonal skills section, the doctors performed less than 40% of the expected tasks in every section. The study highlighted the lack of competence in making a definite diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Among those who apparently made the diagnosis (group B) or made the diagnosis with certainty (group A), there was no demonstration of appropriate treatment behaviour with respect to pharmacological intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anxiety Disorders↗
PubMed1994

Patient care and the general practitioner. Joint Working Party of the Welsh Council of the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Welsh General Medical Services Committee.

The role of general practitioners is being redefined in the light of the emphasis on more care in the community, economic factors, and patients' expectations. The strength of general practice lies in the doctor-patient relationship; this strength must not be lost sight of. Specific tasks of the general practitioner include the responsibility for the care of individuals; the role of gatekeeper; broad knowledge of curative, preventive; and rehabilitative medicine; teamwork; management; and development of population based strategies. Future work patterns include the general practitioner first and foremost as a clinician and an integrator of health services, but they also involve audit, education and training, research, management, and relations with organisations in the public, private, and voluntary sectors. It is important to make changes only when they benefit patients and to maintain the principle of equity of access to care.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1999

Influence on general practitioners of teaching undergraduates: qualitative study of London general practitioner teachers.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the perceived effect of teaching clinical skills and associated teacher training programmes on general practitioners' morale and clinical practice. DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured interview study. SETTING: General practices throughout north London. SUBJECTS: 30 general practitioners who taught clinical skills were asked about the effect of teaching and teacher training on their morale, confidence in clinical and teaching skills, and clinical practice. RESULTS: The main theme was a positive effect on morale. Within teacher training this was attributed to developing peer and professional support; improved teaching skills; and revision of clinical knowledge and skills. Within teaching this was attributed to a broadening of horizons; contact with enthusiastic students; increased time with patients; improved clinical practice; improved teaching skills; and an improved image of the practice. Problems with teaching were due to external factors such as lack of time and space and anxieties about adequacy of clinical cover while teaching. CONCLUSION: Teaching clinical skills can have a positive effect on the morale of general practitioner teachers as a result of contact with students and peers, as long as logistic and funding issues are adequately dealt with.

Anxiety↗
PubMed1995

Treatment preferences, return visit planning and factors affecting hypertension practice amongst general practitioners and internal medicine specialists (the General Practitioner Hypertension Practice Study)

OBJECTIVES: To study clinical practice and attitudes in hypertension care amongst general practitioners (GPs) and hospital internal medicine specialists. DESIGN: Mailed case report questionnaires. SUBJECTS: Ninety GPs and 69 internal medicine specialists at randomly selected primary health care centres and hospital outpatient departments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Case-bound treatment preferences, treatment goals and return visit planning, and views on factors influencing practice. RESULTS: The participation rate was 84% and 70%, for GPs and internal medicine specialists, respectively. GPs more often proposed nonpharmacological therapy (P < 0.05), solely and as a complementary treatment, and prescribed more calcium antagonists (P < 0.001), whilst internal medicine specialists prescribed more ACE inhibitors (P < 0.001). Personal experience guides practice more than national consensus and economy, more so with increasing time since specialization. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and internal medicine specialists in Sweden report a hypertension practice closely related to each others' and to the intentions of national guidelines.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1995

Current and possible screening practices for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: new evidence from a pilot survey of Oxfordshire general practitioners.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between the number of general practitioners in a GP practice and screening for diabetic retinopathy in order to evaluate the viability of increased GP involvement in screening for blinding diabetic eye disease. METHOD: A ten point questionnaire was developed and sent to 50 randomly selected general practitioner practices throughout Oxfordshire. 41 (82%) of the general practitioner practices returned completed questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean number of GP's per GP practice was 4, with a standard deviation of 4 GP's while GP practice sizes ranged from 1 to 9 GP's per practice. Overall, 66% (n = 27) of GP practices indicated that they referred their diabetic patients for screening, even though 83% (n = 34) of GP practices performed funduscopy. 76% (n = 31) of GP practices ran diabetic clinics, and 66% (n = 27) of GP practices indicated that they wanted more training in the use of the ophthalmoscope and detecting diabetic retinopathy, despite the fact that 78% (n = 32) of this same group had received some form of postgraduate medical training in diabetes in the last five years. Lastly, only 27% (n = 11) of GP practices would alter their attitude to screening for diabetic retinopathy if they were paid substantially more to do so. CONCLUSIONS: Most GP practices referred their diabetic patients for screening, even though the majority of GP practices performed some form of funduscopy and that amongst the largest GP practice sizes all performed dilated funduscopy and did not refer for screening. Given sufficient remedial training in the use of the ophthalmoscope and practical sessions on detecting diabetic retinopathy, it is likely that smaller GP practice sizes would be encouraged to screen for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2004

Impact of nurse practitioners on workload of general practitioners: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact on general practitioners' workload of adding nurse practitioners to the general practice team. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with measurements before and after the introduction of nurse practitioners. SETTING: 34 general practices in a southern region of the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 48 general practitioners. INTERVENTION: Five nurses were randomly allocated to general practitioners to undertake specific elements of care according to agreed guidelines. The control group received no nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective workload, derived from 28 day diaries, included the number of contacts per day for each of three conditions (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, dementia, cancer), by type of consultation (in practice, telephone, home visit), and by time of day (surgery hours, out of hours). Subjective workload was measured by using a validated questionnaire. Outcomes were measured six months before and 18 months after the intervention. RESULTS: The number of contacts during surgery hours increased in the intervention group compared with the control group (P < 0.06), particularly for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (P < 0.01). The number of consultations out of hours declined slightly in the intervention group compared with the control group, but this difference did not reach significance. No significant changes became apparent in subjective workload. CONCLUSION: Adding nurse practitioners to general practice teams did not reduce the workload of general practitioners, at least in the short term. This implies that nurse practitioners are used as supplements, rather than substitutes, for care given by general practitioners.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1997

Patterns of HIV testing in Scotland: a general practitioner perspective.

General practitioners are one of the largest groups who offer HIV testing but little is known about the patient group who present for HIV counselling and testing in primary care. This study describes the risk factors, positivity rate, temporal trends and demographic profile of patients presenting to their general practitioner for HIV testing in central Scotland. Of 8,466 tests taken 1% (84%) were positive with an independent association between a positive result and age group, history of drug misuse, homosexuality and region of testing. The majority of tests were performed in those who were at low risk and because of patient concern about HIV. No increase in the number of positive tests was apparent over the five-year study period. Variations between GP testing for HIV occurs in different regions and may reflect the underlying HIV positivity rate. General practitioners performing HIV tests are well placed to educate their patients about HIV and encourage low risk sexual behaviour patterns.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗
PubMed2005

Difficulties associated with outpatient management of drug abusers by general practitioners. A cross-sectional survey of general practitioners with and without methadone patients in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, general practitioners (GPs) manage most of the patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). METHODS: Using a cross-sectional postal survey of GPs who treat MMT patients and GPs who do not, we studied the difficulties encountered in the out-patient management of drug-addicted patients. We sent a questionnaire to every GP with MMT patients (556) in the French-speaking part of Switzerland (1,757,000 inhabitants). We sent another shorter questionnaire to primary care physicians without MMT patients living in the Swiss Canton of Vaud. RESULTS: The response rate was 63.3%. The highest methadone dose given by GPs to MMT patients averaged 120.4 mg/day. When asked about help they would like to be given, GPs with MMT patients primarily mentioned the importance of receiving adequate fees for the care they provide. Secondly, they mentioned the importance of better training, better knowledge of psychiatric pathologies, and discussion groups on practical cases. GPs without MMT patients refuse to treat these patients mostly for emotional and relational reasons. CONCLUSION: GPs encounter financial, relational and emotional difficulties with MMT patients. They desire better fees for services and better training.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care.

OBJECTIVES: To compare patients' and general practitioners' (GPs') evaluations of the quality of general practice care. DESIGN: Written surveys among patients and GPs. SETTING: General practice in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 1772 patients (from 45 GPs) and a random sample of 315 GPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' and GPs' evaluations of 23 aspects of general practice care and GPs' perceptions of patients' evaluations using a 5 point scale. RESULTS: The response rate was 88% in the patient sample and 63% in the GP sample. The patients' ratings of care were significantly more positive (mean 4.0) than those of the GPs (mean 3.7) as well as GPs' perceptions of patients' evaluations (mean 3.5) (p<0.001). The overall rank order correlations between the patients' evaluations, GPs' evaluations, and GPs' perceptions of the patients' evaluations were 0.75 or higher (p<0.001). Patients and practitioners gave the most positive evaluations of specific aspects of the doctor-patient relationship ("keeping patients' records and data confidential", "listening to patients", and "making patients feel they had enough time during consultations") and aspects of the organisation of care ("provide quick service for urgent health problems" and "helpfulness of the staff (other than the doctor)"). The aspects of care evaluated least positively by patients as well as by GPs were other organisational aspects ("preparing patients for what to expect from specialist or hospital care" and "getting through to practice on the telephone"). CONCLUSIONS: GPs and patients have to some extent a shared perspective on general practice care. However, GPs were more critical about the quality of care than patients and they underestimated how positive patients were about the care they provide. Furthermore, specific aspects of care were evaluated differently, so surveys and other consultations with patients are necessary to integrate their perspective into quality improvement activities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[The level of knowledge of general practitioners regarding the early phase of Lyme borreliosis. Survey conducted among 106 general practitioners].

OBJECTIVE: Determine the level of knowledge of the general practitioners on the early phase of Lyme borreliosis in an endemic area and notably to define the attention paid to the use and interpretation of serologic investigations for the treatment of patients with erythema migrans. METHOD: This was a prospective study conducted from May 15 to June 31, 2001 among 106 randomly selected general practitioners installed in Strasbourg, France. The practitioners were all interviewed in their private practice and by the same person. Three standardized questions were asked, evaluating their level of specific medical training on Lyme borreliosis as well as their practice regarding treatment and diagnosis of erythema migrans. RESULTS: One third of the general practitioners had already accomplished a continued medical education course on Lyme borreliosis. Half of them considered that the diagnosis of erythema migrans was clinical, while the other half believed that serological confirmation was mandatory. However, the answers of those having received specific education on borreliosis were right (p=0.0079) since in this sub-group 72% considered that the diagnosis was exclusively based on clinical examination, versus 41% of the untrained physicians. Eighty-eight percent used the recommended antibiotic regimens to treat erythema migrans. Three practitioners proposed an inefficient treatment that had exposed the patients to the risk of extra-cutaneous complications of the disease. CONCLUSION: Fifty percent of the general practitioners working in endemic areas for Lyme borreliosis still believe that seropositivity against Borrelia burgdorferi is required to diagnose erythema migrans, which is untrue. However, this study shows that a specific education on Lyme borreliosis would significantly improve this score.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Cultural influences on the prevalence of common mental disorder, general practitioners' assessments and help-seeking among Punjabi and English people visiting their general practitioner.

BACKGROUND: Culture influences symptom presentation and help-seeking and may influence the general practitioner's assessment. METHODS: We recruited Punjabi and English GP attenders to a two-phase survey in London (UK) using the Amritsar Depression Inventory and the General Health Questionnaire as screening instruments. The Clinical Interview Schedule was the criterion measure. General practitioners completed Likert assessments. RESULTS: The second phase was completed by 209 Punjabi and 180 English subjects. The prevalence of common mental disorders was not influenced by culture. Punjabi cases more often had 'poor concentration and memory' and 'depressive ideas' but were not more likely to have somatic symptoms. General practitioners were more likely to assess Punjabis with common mental disorder as having 'physical and somatic' symptoms or 'sub-clinical disorders'. Punjabi cases with depressive ideas were less likely to be detected compared with English ones. In comparison to English men, English women were under-detected by Asian general practitioners. Help-seeking English subjects were more likely to be correctly identified as cases. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of common mental disorders and somatic symptoms does not differ across cultures. Among English subjects, general practitioners were more likely to identify correctly pure psychiatric illness and mixed pathology; but Punjabi subjects with common mental disorders were more often assessed as having 'sub-clinical disorders' and 'physical and somatic' disorders. English women were less well detected than English men. English help-seeking cases were more likely to be detected.

Adolescent↗