Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Food Labeling”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

[Comparative analysis of Brazil, Mercosul, Great Britain and European Union of food labeling legislation].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the Brazilian/Mercosul and the British/European Union food labeling legislation. METHODS: The analysis was carried out using a set of 19 questions considered important to describe and compare the different sets of legislation. RESULTS: The results showed that all sets of legislation were very similar. Regarding health claims, the legislation differentiates content from effect claims. However, it is shown to be difficult to do so because both of them express the same message, that a product is good for the health. Concerning nutrition label, the problem is that in all sets of legislation it is only compulsory when a health claim is made. Another problem is that the nutritional description is required to be by weight, while international nutritional recommendations are made as percentage of energy. CONCLUSIONS: Health claims should not be allowed, they are potentially misleading and do not convey more information than nutrition label. Nutrition label should be compulsory, and the macronutrients presented as percentage of energy together with the international nutritional recommendations.

Brazil↗
PubMed2003

Food labeling: health claims; soluble dietary fiber from certain foods and coronary heart disease. Final rule.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is adopting as a final rule, without change, the provisions of the interim final rule that amended the regulation authorizing a health claim on the relationship between beta-glucan soluble fiber from whole oat sources and reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). FDA is taking this action to complete the rulemaking initiated with the interim final rule.

Avena↗
PubMed2006

Food labeling: health claims; soluble dietary fiber from certain foods and coronary heart disease. Final rule.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is adopting as a final rule, without change, the provisions of the interim final rule that amended the regulation authorizing a health claim on the relationship between beta-glucan soluble fiber from whole oat sources and reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) by adding barley as an additional source of beta-glucan soluble fiber eligible for the health claim. FDA is taking this action to complete the rulemaking initiated with the interim final rule.

Coronary Disease↗
PubMed2002

Food labeling: health claims; soluble dietary fiber from certain foods and coronary heart disease. Interim final rule.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the regulation authorizing a health claim on the relationship between beta-glucan soluble fiber from whole oat sources and reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). The amendment adds as an additional eligible source of whole oat beta-glucan soluble fiber, the soluble fraction of alpha-amylase hydrolyzed oat bran or whole oat flour with a beta-glucan soluble fiber content of up to 10 percent on a dry weight basis (dwb) and not less than that of the starting material (dwb). We (FDA) are taking this action in response to a petition jointly filed by the Quaker Oats Co. and Rhodia, Inc. (the petitioners). We concluded previously that there was significant scientific agreement that a relationship exists between the beta-glucan soluble fiber of certain whole oat sources and the reduction of risk of CHD by lowering blood cholesterol levels. We now have concluded, based on the publicly available scientific evidence that, in addition to rolled oats, oat bran, and whole oat flour, the soluble fraction of alpha-amylase hydrolyzed oat bran or whole oat flour with a beta-glucan content up to 10 percent (dwb) and not less than that of the starting material (dwb) is an appropriate source of beta-glucan soluble fiber for the health claim. Therefore, we are amending the regulation that authorizes a health claim on the relationship between soluble fiber from whole oats and reduced risk of CHD to include this additional source of beta-glucan soluble fiber.

Avena↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Do nutrition label readers eat healthier diets? Behavioral correlates of adults' use of food labels.

BACKGROUND: Reading and understanding nutrition labels on foods may be an important precursor to dietary change. However, little is known about how nutrition labels are used by consumers and what effect reading labels has on dietary behaviors. METHODS: This article identifies behavioral and health status correlates of nutrition label reading and describes patterns of label use among 885 adult patients from four family medicine clinics in southeastern Missouri. To participate, patients completed a self-administered survey while waiting to see their physicians. RESULTS: Analyses revealed patients eating diets lower in fat were much more likely (51% versus 26%) than patients whose diets were higher in fat to report labels influencing their food purchase decisions, as were patients eating diets higher in fruits, vegetables, and fiber. Patients with high blood pressure were 63% more likely than those with normal or low blood pressure to look for sodium on the nutrition label (odds ratio [OR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35, 1.97), but no more likely to look for other nutrition label information. Similarly, patients with high cholesterol were more likely than those with normal or low cholesterol to look for saturated fat (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.72) and cholesterol (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.29, 1.98) on the label, but no more likely to look for other nutrition label information. CONCLUSIONS: Findings consistently supported a relationship between patients' label reading and their dietary practices.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Consumer use of health-related endorsements on food labels in the United Kingdom and Australia.

The objective of this research was to examine how consumers use health-related food endorsements on food labels. Three endorsement programs were examined: those of the two major retailers in the United Kingdom, Tesco and Sainsbury's, and the "Pick the Tick" program of the National Heart Foundation of Australia. The main methodology used was protocol analysis. This involves the subject "thinking aloud" while performing a task--in this case, (a) shopping normally and (b) shopping "healthily" for foods on a predetermined list--to generate a protocol. Each subject was also interviewed to investigate reported use of endorsements. Subjects were a quota sample (N = 44) of shoppers representative of the U.K. and Australian populations. Information about the subjects, the protocols, and interview data were analyzed quantitatively; the protocols were also analyzed qualitatively. Sainsbury's and Australian shoppers never used the endorsements when shopping but Tesco shoppers did, albeit rarely. Tesco shoppers used the endorsement in complex ways and not just as a trigger to food selection. They sometimes used the endorsement to reject endorsed foods. Subjects claimed to use the endorsements even though the protocol analysis revealed no actual use. There are features of the Tesco endorsement program that make it more helpful to consumers than the other programs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Use of population-weighted Estimated Average Requirements as a basis for Daily Values on food labels.

In both Canada and the United States, nutrition labeling is now mandatory for most packaged foods. The labeling is intended to help consumers select foods that can contribute to a healthful diet, but current label values are based on outdated notions of nutrient requirements. The Committee on Use of Dietary Reference Intakes in Nutrition Labeling has recommended that the reference values used for nutrition labeling be based on a population-weighted Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for any nutrient for which requirements have been estimated. This value approximates the median of the distribution of nutrient requirements for individuals who are members of the target population for food labels. It provides the most scientifically valid, single point of comparison for an appraisal of the probable contribution of a specific food to the overall nutrient needs of individuals in the target population. In contrast, a reference value based on a population coverage approach would understate the nutrient contribution of the food item relative to the requirements of the vast majority of individuals in the target population and thus offer misinformation rather than positive guidance to the consumer.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Food labeling].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Food Labeling↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reading food labels.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Food Labeling↗
PubMed2002

Food label use modifies association of income with dietary quality.

We analyzed the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey (DHKS) to examine whether the relationship between income and dietary quality is modified by food label (FL) use among 20- to 60-y old DHKS respondents who were either household meal preparers, meal planners or food shoppers (n = 2952). Multivariate logistic regression results indicated that the influence of income on dietary quality is mediated by FL use. Those who were wealthier and used FL were significantly less likely to have a lower Healthy Eating Index (HEI) compared with the reference group formed by those in the lower income category who did not use FL [OR = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.56]. By contrast, those who were wealthier but did not use FL were as likely as the reference group to have a low HEI (OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.54). Those who were poorer but used FL were significantly less likely to have a low HEI compared with the reference group (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.80). Thus, FL use is associated with improved dietary quality among all income groups with a greater benefit of use among higher income individuals. Income is not associated with improved dietary quality in the absence of FL use.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Ethical debates in genetic engineering: U.S. scientists' attitudes on patenting, germ-line research, food labeling, and agri-biotech issues.

A 1995 survey of 1,257 scientists working in the field of recombinant DNA research indicates wide areas of agreement as well as some noteworthy divisions when it comes to such thorny questions as patenting, germ-line research, food labeling, and biodiversity. In general, the scientists surveyed approve of patenting living organisms that result from rDNA research, but vary significantly on what should be patentable. They advocate human germ-line therapy, yet have reservations about using it for any but serious diseases. They oppose mandatory labeling of biologically engineered food products, but understand that the public has a right to know and advocate openness. Finally, they favor development of threats to biodiversity and maintain that publicly funded researchers should be legally obligated to consider the potential environmental effects of their research. Some clear differences arise between scientists working in industry and those in academia and between men and women.

Access to Information↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Comprehension of food label claims by university undergraduate students].

The purpose of this study was to determine whether claims made on food labels are well or poorly understood and whether the sex and the experience of consumers in buying food products influence their understanding of the various terms used in the food industry. A questionnaire was randomly distributed to 285 students registered in various undergraduate programs at the University of Ottawa. The average grade of all the respondents to the questionnaire was 53.6% which indicates a lack of understanding of the meanings of the various terms used in the food industry. The results also indicate that more frequent exposure to advertising by the food industry is apt to confuse the consumer. Finally, the respondents without experience in buying food products answered significantly better on three questions; in general, men without experience had significantly better results than women on some questions.

Adult↗