Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Familiarity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Familiarity influences body darkening in territorial disputes between juvenile salmon.

Escalated contests between animals are potentially costly because of increased energy expenditure and risk of predation or injury. Hence we would expect selection to favour any mechanism that avoids unnecessary prolonged fighting. One such means of avoiding escalated fights could be the use of information gained through individual recognition. Previous work has shown that a darkening of the body colour is closely associated with submission in contests between juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, and it has been hypothesized that this may act as a visual signal to the opponent. We tested the hypothesis that body darkening is used to reduce the cost of contests between familiar fish such that losers darken more quickly when faced with familiar than unfamiliar opponents. In contests between unfamiliar fish, submissive darkening occurred after more escalated contests in which the loser incurred more aggression, whereas the opposite occurred when familiar fish were in conflict. In addition familiar fish either submitted quickly or engaged in protracted conflicts in which neither fish signalled submission, whereas in unfamiliar fish contests were of intermediate duration regardless of whether either fish darkened. We suggest that body darkening is used by familiar fish to signal submission to familiar dominants in order to avert a costly escalated fight, but familiarity can lead to escalation without submission if perceived competitive asymmetries are finely balanced. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Long-term retention in 3.5-month-olds: familiarization time and individual differences in attentional style.

Using a paired-comparison procedure, we examined the effect of familiarization variables on 3.5-month-old infants' (n = 120) retention of dynamic visual stimuli after 1-min, 1-day, and 1-month delays. The proportion of total looking time to the novel stimulus revealed novelty, null, and familiarity preferences after 1-min, 1-day, and 1-month delays, respectively, for infants who were permitted 30 s of familiarization time. Twenty seconds of familiarization time was insufficient to produce novelty preferences. These results support models of infant retention in which the direction of attentional preferences (novel, familiar, or null) depends on memory accessibility. To examine the impact of individual differences in familiarization or attentional style on memory, infants were identified as long or short lookers according to their peak-look duration on pretest and familiarization trial measures. Compared to long lookers, short lookers showed better retention over time indicating that much of the variability in the infant group data could be accounted for by these individual differences.

Attention↗
PubMed1993

Neuronal activity related to visual recognition memory: long-term memory and the encoding of recency and familiarity information in the primate anterior and medial inferior temporal and rhinal cortex.

Recordings of the activity of 2705 single neurones were made in entorhinal and perirhinal cortex, area TG of the temporal lobe, and the inferior temporal cortex both during monkeys' performance of a serial recognition memory task using complex pictures and when monkeys were shown objects. Responses of 120 (9.7%) of the visually responsive neurons recorded were significantly smaller to the second than to the first presentations of unfamiliar stimuli. The incidence of such responses was highest in perirhinal cortex plus areas TE1 and TE2 of the temporal lobe, intermediate in lateral entorhinal cortex and areas TE3 and TG, and lowest in other parts of entorhinal and inferior temporal cortex. Response decrements were maintained across 20 or more intervening presentations of other stimuli for the majority of the neurones tested. Responses of 43 (14.4%) of the visually responsive neurones tested were significantly greater to unfamiliar than to highly familiar stimuli. Such differential responses were found only in lateral entorhinal and perirhinal cortex plus areas TG, TE1, TE2 and TE3. For 6 neurones the response difference was significant even when the familiar stimuli had not been seen for more than 24 h: such neurones demonstrate access to information stored in long-term memory for more than 24 h. Seven familiarity neurones signalled information concerning the relative familiarity of stimuli but not information concerning how recently they were last seen; 58 recency neurones signalled information concerning the recency of presentation of stimuli, but not their relative familiarity. Thus certain neurones demonstrate the separable encoding of recency and familiarity information. Neurones signalling information of use for recognition memory are found in cortex close to the rhinal sulcus where lesions result in major deficits in the performance of recognition memory tasks. The conjunction of these findings provides strong evidence for the importance of these neurones and this cortex for processes (recency and familiarity discrimination) necessary for recognition and working memory. The possible relation of the neuronal responses to priming memory is also discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1980

Influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speech.

Speech pathologists often estimate intelligibility as dysarthric speakers read standard passages. The first phase of this study compared estimates of intelligibility made by speech pathologists with transcription scores made by judges unfamiliar with the speech passages. Results indicated that speech pathologists consistently overestimated intelligibility. It was hypothesized that judge familiarity with the speech sample contributed to these inflated scores. Therefore, during the second phase of the study the influence of speech sample familiarity on estimates of intelligiblity was investigated. Group of listeners judged mild, moderate, and severely dysarthric speakers under three conditions of familiarity--Unfamiliar (passage unknown), Partially Familiar (passage read twice by a normal speaker), and Most Familiar (script of the passage available). For mild and severely dysarthric speakers, passage familiarity did not significantly influence judges' estimates. For the moderately dysarthric speaker, estimates of intelligibility increased markedly with increasing passage familiarity. Clinical implications of these results are discussed.

Dysarthria↗
PubMed1988

Event-related potentials and the matching of familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from one midline and three pairs of lateral sites while subjects made same/different judgements on sequentially presented pairs of familiar or unfamiliar faces. During the interval between the first and second face, a slow wave was more negative-going over the right than the left hemisphere, particularly when the faces were familiar. Following the second face, two regions of the waveforms were more negative-going when this face did not match the identity of its predecessor. In the early region (less than 160 msec), this effect was confined to posterior electrode sites and familiar faces. In the later region (greater than 250 msec), the match/non-match effect was widespread across the scalp and was evident for both familiar and non-familiar faces, although in the latency range 350-450 msec (encompassing the "N400" component), it was greater in magnitude in the case of familiar stimuli. It is suggested that the slow wave asymmetries reflect the engagement of short-term memory mechanisms lateralized to the right hemisphere. The match/non-match differences are thought to reflect multiple processes, including the modulation of the "N400" component. The sensitivity of this component to the familiarity manipulation is consistent with the hypothesis that the amplitude of N400 reflects an item's compatibility with currently activated memory representations.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Cortical mechanisms of person representation: recognition of famous and personally familiar names.

Personally familiar people are likely to be represented more richly in episodic, emotional, and behavioral contexts than famous people, who are usually represented predominantly in semantic context. To reveal cortical mechanisms supporting this differential person representation, we compared cortical activation during name recognition tasks between personally familiar and famous names, using an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Normal subjects performed familiar- or unfamiliar-name detection tasks during visual presentation of personally familiar (Personal), famous (Famous), and unfamiliar (Unfamiliar) names. The bilateral temporal poles and anterolateral temporal cortices, as well as the left temporoparietal junction, were activated in the contrasts Personal-Unfamiliar and Famous-Unfamiliar to a similar extent. The bilateral occipitotemporoparietal junctions, precuneus, and posterior cingulate cortex showed activation in the contrasts Personal-Unfamiliar and Personal-Famous. Together with previous findings, differential activation in the occipitotemporoparietal junction, precuneus, and posterior cingulate cortex between personally familiar and famous names is considered to reflect differential person representation. The similar extent of activation for personally familiar and famous names in the temporal pole and anterolateral temporal cortex is consistent with the associative role of the anterior temporal cortex in person identification, which has been conceptualized as a person identity node in many models of person identification. The left temporoparietal junction was considered to process familiar written names. The results illustrated the neural correlates of the person representation as a network of discrete regions in the bilateral posterior cortices, with the anterior temporal cortices having a unique associative role.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Role of familiarity on effects of caffeine- and glucose-containing soft drinks.

Familiarity, through conditioned responses and expectations, may play a significant role in the expression of liking for, and mood and performance effects of, food and drink constituents. The role of familiarity and the effects of caffeine and glucose in Lucozade Energy were investigated by testing this familiar soft drink, and its non-caffeine/non-CHO placebo match, against novel coloured/flavoured full and placebo drinks. Both the familiar drink and its placebo improved alertness, mental energy and mental performance compared to baseline and compared to the novel placebo drink. After repeated exposure, that is, after having gained familiarity with the novel drinks in addition to the already existing familiarity with Lucozade Energy, only the full (caffeine and CHO containing) drinks showed sustained beneficial effects compared to placebo drinks and baseline measures, as well as an increase in liking compared to placebo drinks. Therefore, participants appeared to have learned that beneficial effects were mainly linked to the full products. The results illustrate the restorative combination of caffeine and CHO in the drink, and emphasises the need to implement the appropriate placebo(s) in any study design employing familiar foods or drinks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender.

We carried out four experiments to assess the extent to which familiarity with certain objects in everyday life is related to gender and can account, at least partially, for the semantic category dissociation observed in a few brain-damaged patients. In the first experiment, 210 normal subjects, half males and half females, were given the names of 60 stimuli from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart's set, 30 belonging to living categories and 30 to non-living categories. The task was to rate their familiarity, based on the frequency with which one (i) thinks or speaks of a given item, (ii) sees it represented in the media, and (iii) is confronted with real exemplars. The three indices were highly correlated and their average value was, therefore, used. Females gave higher familiarity ratings to fruit, vegetables and furniture and males to tools. The second experiment was aimed to verify whether the gender difference was responsible for the category dissociation found following brain damage. A male patient with greater impairment for living categories and a female patient with greater impairment for non-living categories were requested to name the same 60 stimuli and their scores were analysed, partialling out the familiarity effect, measured both with the non-gender specific index of Snodgrass and Vanderwart and with the new gender-specific index. In either case, the category dissociation remained significant. To determine if the mean general population familiarity index was valid for the single subject, we studied whether a cohabitant first degree relative was able to predict a normal subject's familiarity better than the population index. Contrary to expectations, the better predictor was the population index. The test-retest reliability of each subject's familiarity ratings was satisfactory, but not higher than the correlation between the personal judgement of each subject and the population index.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Neural substrates for recognition of familiar voices: a PET study.

Identification of familiar people is essential in our social life. We can identify familiar people by hearing their voices as well as by viewing their faces. By measuring regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) by positron emission tomography (PET), we identified neural substrates for the recognition of familiar voices. The brain activity during discrimination of voices of the subjects' associates and friends from those of unfamiliar people was compared with that during an analogous discrimination of their own voice from unfamiliar voices as well as during vowel discrimination. The left frontal pole, right temporal pole, right entorhinal cortex, and left precuneus were activated to a greater extent during discrimination of familiar voice than during control discriminations, suggesting that these brain regions are involved in the recognition of familiar voices. Furthermore, the adjusted values of rCBF in the left frontal pole and right temporal pole correlated with the number of subjects' correct identification of familiar voices. The present results suggest that these two regions are coactively associated with matching the currently heard voice to familiar voices in one's memory.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Effects of familiarity on mothers' talk about nouns and verbs.

Modifications mothers make when talking to young English-speaking children between the ages of 1;8 and 3;0 (average age = 2;4) about words perceived to be familiar versus unfamiliar were investigated. Nineteen mothers and their children participated in two toy play tasks; one designed to elicit talk about familiar and unfamiliar animals and the other designed to elicit talk about familiar and unfamiliar actions. It was found that mothers' talk involving unfamiliar words differed from talk involving familiar words in a number of ways. Some modifications served to highlight the unfamiliar word which could assist in segmenting the unfamiliar word and mapping it to its referent. Compared to familiar nouns and verbs, unfamiliar nouns and verbs were produced more frequently in highly salient utterance positions and were paired more consistently with a clear nonverbal referent. Familiar nouns but, not verbs, were produced in longer utterances than unfamiliar nouns which could support the child's elaboration of the lexical representation of the familiar word.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Memory for novel and familiar spatial and linguistic temporal distance information in hypoxic subjects.

Hypoxia is known to cause damage to the hippocampus as well as memory impairments in humans. Subjects who have experienced a hypoxic episode and age-, gender-, and education-matched control subjects were tested for memory for spatial and linguistic temporal distance information using sentences and spatial locations. Each test contained a familiar component based on information that is meaningful and is thought to be stored as part of the knowledge system (prior knowledge) as well as a novel component based on new information. Subjects were presented a list of eight-word sentences or eight spatial locations (Xs) on a grid on a Macintosh computer and tested for memory for temporal distances. Temporal distance is defined as the number of items that occur between the two test items, in the study phase. Compared to control subjects, hypoxic subjects were impaired across all temporal distances on the novel spatial and linguistic tasks. As the temporal distance increased, hypoxic subjects showed some improvement in memory performance. In addition, memory of familiar temporal distance information was also assessed. Hypoxic subjects were impaired, compared to control subjects, for familiar temporal distance information. For hypoxic subjects there was a proportionally greater impairment for novel compared to familiar spatial and linguistic temporal distance information. There was a significant difference in their performance on the familiar temporal distance tasks compared to their performance on the novel tasks. Prior knowledge appears to attenuate the deficits seen in the familiar temporal distance tasks. It appears that hypoxia may cause more selective damage to the hippocampus and this damage is sufficient to produce profound memory impairments for primarily novel and less severe memory impairments for familiar spatial and linguistic temporal distance information.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Model of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex.

Much evidence indicates that recognition memory involves two separable processes, recollection and familiarity discrimination, with familiarity discrimination being dependent on the perirhinal cortex of the temporal lobe. Here, we describe a new neural network model designed to mimic the response patterns of perirhinal neurons that signal information concerning the novelty or familiarity of stimuli. The model achieves very fast and accurate familiarity discrimination while employing biologically plausible parameters and Hebbian learning rules. The fact that the activity patterns of the model's simulated neurons are closely similar to those of neurons recorded from the primate perirhinal cortex indicates that this brain region could discriminate familiarity using principles akin to those of the model. If so, the capacity of the model establishes that the perirhinal cortex alone may discriminate the familiarity of many more stimuli than current neural network models indicate could be recalled (recollected) by all the remaining areas of the cerebral cortex. This efficiency and speed of detecting novelty provides an evolutionary advantage, thereby providing a reason for the existence of a familiarity discrimination network in addition to networks used for recollection.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Self-presentation in everyday interactions: effects of target familiarity and gender composition.

This study examined people's self-presentation motives in unstructured, everyday social interaction as a function of participants' gender similarity to, and general familiarity with, the targets of their self-presentations. Participants maintained a variant of the Rochester Interaction Record for 1 week. For every interaction that lasted 10 min or more, they rated the degree to which they wanted to make each of 4 impressions (likable, competent, ethical, and attractive), how much they thought about the impressions others in the interaction formed of them, and how nervous they felt in the interaction. In general, participants' self-presentational motives were lower in interactions with highly familiar people of their own sex than they were either in interactions with less familiar people of their sex or in interactions with people of the other sex regardless of familiarity. When participants' interactions with only their 3 most familiar interactants were examined, self-presentational concerns decreased with familiarity in same-sex interactions but increased with familiarity in cross-sex interactions.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1978

Role of visual familiarity in the word-superiority effects obtained with the simultaneous-matching task.

Three experiments assessed the effect of visual familiarity of words on same-different reaction times (RTs) in a simultaneous-matching task. Visual familiarity was disrupted by using upper- and lowercase letters within sequences. The results for same judgments in Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that visual familiarity was responsible for most of the large word-superiority effect obtained. The third experiment investigated the extent to which the effects obtained with word-frequency and orthographic-regularity manipulations were due to visual familiarity. For same RTs the results indicated both types of familiarity effects were dependent on visual familiarity. With pure-case stimuli, high-frequency words were processed faster than low-frequency words. Low-frequency words and orthographically regular nonwords produced similar reaction times, and both were processed faster than unpronounceable nonwords. These effects were not evident with mixed-case stimuli. All three studies showed visual familiarity to be responsible for differences in slope over sequence length between words and nonwords. Results with different judgments were dissimilar enough from the pattern of results for same judgments to present problems of interpretation, and it was suggested that additional or alternative processes were involved. The implications of these data for models of word processing were discussed.

Awareness↗
PubMed1984

Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.

Numerous word recognition studies conducted over the past 2 decades are examined. These studies manipulated lexical familiarity by presenting words of high versus low printed frequency and most reported an interaction between printed frequency and one of several second variables, namely, orthographic regularity, semantic concreteness, or polysemy. However, the direction of these interactions was inconsistent from study to study. Six new experiments clarify these discordant results. The first two demonstrate that words of the same low printed frequency are not always equally familiar to subjects. Instead, subjects' ratings of "experimental familiarity" suggest that many of the low-printed-frequency words used in prior studies varied along this dimension. Four lexical decision experiments reexamine the prior findings by orthogonally manipulating lexical familiarity, as assessed by experiential familiarity ratings, with bigram frequency, semantic concreteness, and number of meanings. The results suggest that of these variables, only experiential familiarity reliably affects word recognition latencies. This in turn suggests that previous inconsistent findings are due to confounding experiential familiarity with a second variable.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory.

Dual-process theories of recognition posit that a perceptual familiarity process contributes to both explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory. This putative single familiarity process has been indexed by inclusion-exclusion, remember-know, and repetition priming measures. The present studies examined whether these measures identify a common familiarity process. Familiarity-based explicit recognition (as indexed by the inclusion-exclusion and the independence remember-know procedures) increased with conceptual processing. In contrast, implicit word-identification priming and familiarity-based word-stem completion (as indexed by inclusion-exclusion) increased with study-test perceptual similarity. These dissociations indicate that familiarity-based explicit recognition may be more sensitive to conceptual than to perceptual processing and is functionally distinct from the perceptual familiarity process mediating implicit perceptual memory.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Familiarity with conspecific odor and isolation-induced aggressive behavior in male mice (Mus domesticus).

Male Swiss CD-1 mice (Mus domesticus, n = 60) were isolated for 24 days. In the isolation group mice were exposed to their own odor; in the familiarity group mice were familiarized with pairmates' odor by daily exchange of bedding; and in the unfamiliarity group subjects (exposed) were familiarized with pairmates' odor, whereas the pairmates (nonexposed) were familiarized with odors of other isolated mice. Aggressive behavior was scored during 20-min sessions. Familiarity with the pairmate's odor (familiarity and exposed subgroups) caused an enhancement of aggressive behavior, shown by the highest frequency of tail rattling and offensive upright posture and by a decrease in latency to the 1st attack. Nonexposed subjects showed high values of submissive upright posture, screaming, fleeing, and freezing. The results suggest that dominantlike behavior, acquired in social isolation, may be directed toward a conspecific whose odor is familiar.

Aggression↗
PubMed2002

Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: a comparison of children and adolescents.

Idioms (e.g., go by the book, keep a straight face) are figurative expressions that frequently occur in the English language. Given the pervasiveness of these expressions, it is important that young people can understand their meanings. Developmental studies have shown that idioms that are higher in familiarity and transparency (e.g., blow off some steam) are generally easier for children and adolescents to understand than those that are less familiar and more opaque (e.g., pull up one's socks). In those studies, judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency were based on the perceptions of individuals who were older than the study participants. In the present study, 11-year-old children (n = 50) and 16-year-old adolescents (n = 50) were asked to judge the familiarity and transparency of a set of 20 idioms. Their comprehension of the same expressions was also examined. The results indicated that the children were less familiar with the idioms and had greater difficulty comprehending them than did the adolescents. However, the children's transparency judgments did not differ from those of the adolescents. For the children, the easiest idioms were also more familiar and transparent than the most difficult expressions. For the adolescents, the easiest idioms were more transparent than the most difficult ones, but the two types did not differ in familiarity. Suggestions are offered for conducting future studies of the development of idiom understanding in youth.

Adolescent↗