Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FLUOROURACIL”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Chemotherapy of advanced measurable colon and rectal carcinoma with oral 5-fluorouracil, alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide or 6-thioguanine, with intravenous 5-fluorouracil or beta-2'-deoxythioguanosine or with oral 3(4-methyl-cyclohexyl)-1(2-chlorethyl)-1-nitrosourea: a Phase II-III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (EST 4273).

In a randomized multi-institutional trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, 316 patients with advanced measurable colorectal adenocarcinoma were treated with a weekly schedule of 5-fluorouracil given orally and intravenously with oral-5-fluorouracil in combination with cyclophosphamide or 6-thioguanine, or with oral Methyl CCNU administered once every eight weeks. On failure or progression, 133 protocol patients crossed-over to a secondary therapy, while 116 other patients previously treated with 5-fluorouracil off protocol were randomized to treatment with Methyl CCNU or B-2'-deoxythioguanosine. Response rates among patients who had received no prior chemotherapy were 18% to oral 5-FU, 15% to intravenous 5-FU and to MeCCNU, 12% to 5-FU and 6-thioguanine and 5% to cyclophosphamide and 5-FU, with little activity (3% response rate) in crossover or previously treated patients. Treatment with 5-FU, particularly oral 5-FU was associated with the least drug-related toxicity. Hematologic toxicity was greatest with Methyl CCNU, but was no more frequent in previously treated than in untreated patients. A tendency toward cumulative bone marrow depression was noted. 5-FU was effective only in ambulatory patients, whereas responses among non-ambulatory patients were seen only in the group treated with Methyl-CCNU.

Adenocarcinoma↗

High-pressure liquid chromatographic determination of ftorafur [1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil] and GLC-mass spectrometric determination of 5-fluorouracil and uracil in biological materials after oral administration of uracil plus ftorafur.

Oral administration of uracil plus ftorafur [1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil] has a greater antitumor effect than that of ftorafur alone. A high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods was developed for the determination of ftorafur in plasma and visceral tissues with a sensitivity of 0.025 microgram/ml or g of wet weight. A combination of GLC--mass fragmentography and GLC--mass spectrometry with total-ion monitoring was developed for the specific, simultaneous determination of 5-fluorouracil, and active metabolite, and uracil as their trimethylsilylated derivatives. The detection limits for 5-fluorouracil and uracil in the first method were 0.001 microgram/ml for plasma and 0.001--0.005 microgram/ml for visceral tissues, and those in the second method were 0.2 microgram/ml or g of wet weight. The precision and sensitivity of the assay appear to be satisfactory for determination of the levels of these compounds in plasma and visceral tissues.

Administration, Oral↗

Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of doxorubicin versus methotrexate in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC versus CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 985 women undergoing curative surgery for breast cancer (T1-3 N0-2 M0, stage I-IIIA, UICC) from nine hospitals were stratified with respect to axillary node involvement (node positive versus node negative) and randomized to receive either FAC (500/50/500/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles or CMF (600/60/600/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: The relative dose intensities of FAC and CMF were 87% and 85% of planned doses, respectively. Unadjusted data indicated a non-significant trend towards better results with FAC. In the prospectively formed subset of node-negative patients, disease-free survival and overall survival were statistically superior in the FAC treatment arm (P = 0.041 and 0.034, respectively), but this advantage was not seen in the subset of node-positive patients, probably because of a difference in the percentage of patients with four or more positive nodes. Adjusting data for size of treatment effect and potential interactions (number of positive nodes, tumor size, treatment center), the overall relative risk (RR) of disease recurrence and death were significantly lower with FAC treatment (RR 1.2, P = 0.03, and RR 1.3, P = 0.05, respectively). This result was mainly due to the difference observed in the node-negative patient population. Toxicity was mild: FAC induced more alopecia, emesis, mucositis and cardiotoxicity; this last was of clinical concern, but was infrequent and manageable. CMF induced more conjunctivitis and weight gain. There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil is superior to methotrexate in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. A treatment effect is particularly evident in the node-negative patients. Although the clinical toxicity of FAC is greater than that of CMF, the levels were manageable and clinically acceptable.

Adolescent↗

A randomized study of bolus fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus 21-day fluorouracil infusion alone or in association with cyclophosphamide and mitomycin C in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

From May 1988 to June 1992, 129 eligible patients suffering from measurable advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled in a randomized study comparing bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FU-FA); continuous fluorouracil infusion (FU-cont); FUcont plus cyclophosphamide and mitomycin C (FUMIC). FU-FA consisted of weekly fluorouracil (FUra) bolus (600 mg/m2) 1 hour after the initiation of a 2-hour infusion of 500 mg/m2 of leucovorin, for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. FUcont patients were planned to receive 400 mg/m2/day FUra infusion, for 21 days every 28 days. In FUMIC patients, FUcont was associated with weekly cyclophosphamide bolus (300 mg/m2) and monthly mitomycin C bolus (10 mg/m2). Quality of life was evaluated using six linear analogue scales, completed by the patient. Accrual in the FUMIC arm was stopped after the 25th patient because of toxicity. The response rates were 22 of 48 (45.8%) with FUcont and 13 of 52 (25%) with FU-FA (P = .048). Progression-free survival (median: 8 v 4.4 months; P = .0026) and overall survival (median: 12.9 v 9.6 months; P = .028) were significantly greater for the FUcont arm compared with the FU-FA arm. Toxicity was observed in 62% of the FUcont patients (grade 3-4: 10%), mainly hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, mucositis, and mainly gastrointestinal in 69% of the FU-FA patients (grade 3-4: 11.6%). Linear analogue scales exploring quality of life, available for the first 6 months, gave similar scores in FU-FA and FUcont patients. We conclude that this FUcont schedule, achieving high FUra dose-intensity, offers significant advantages, in terms of response and survival, over weekly FUra plus leucovorin.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A randomized multicenter trial comparing mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil in the therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma.

Three hundred thirty-one women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive combination chemotherapy with either cyclophosphamide, Novantrone (mitoxantrone; Lederle Laboratories, Wayne, NJ), and fluorouracil (CNF) or cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and fluorouracil (CAF). Patients could not have had prior chemotherapy, although adjuvant chemotherapy was acceptable. Initial doses were 500 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 500 mg/m2 of fluorouracil with either 10 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone or 50 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, administered intravenously (IV) on day 1 and repeated every 3 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment or prior therapy characteristics between the groups. For patients assigned to the CNF and CAF groups, respectively, 25 (18%) were premenopausal, 39 (40%) were estrogen receptor (ER) negative, 39 (38%) had a disease-free interval less than 1 year, and 24 (26%) had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were compared for response rate, duration of response, time to progression or death, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. None of these parameters were statistically significant favoring one regimen over the other. The response rate (complete [CR] and partial response [PR]) was 29% for the CNF group (95% confidence interval of 22% to 37%) and 37% for the CAF group (95% confidence interval of 29% to 45%). The median response duration and TTF were 171 days and 125 days for the CNF group and 254 days and 147 days for the CAF group, respectively. The median survival times for the CNF group and the CAF group were 377 and 385 days, respectively. The major dose-limiting toxicity for both regimens was leukopenia, manifested as granulocytopenia. The incidence of stomatitis/mucositis was 10% in the CNF group and 19% in the CAF group. Alopecia occurred in 49% of CNF patients (severely for 4%) and in 86% of CAF patients (severely for 39%). Nausea/vomiting occurred in 80% of CNF patients and in 81% of CAF patients; the degree of severity was also comparable. There was significantly less cardiotoxicity observed in the CNF group compared with the CAF group. Although CNF is somewhat less effective in overall response rate, survival curves are identical. CNF can be offered to patients who reject anthracycline-containing regimens because of fear of alopecia.

Adult↗

Adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus chlorambucil, methotrexate, and fluorouracil--11-year results of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research trial SAKK 27/82.

PURPOSE: To compare two adjuvant combination chemotherapies, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) and chlorambucil, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (LMF), for patients who had undergone potentially curative surgery for unilateral breast cancer, in terms of relapse, survival, and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Selection criteria was as follows: stage pT1-3a, N+ or N-, M0, less than 72 years of age. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) on days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 I.V. on days 1 and 8) or LMF (Leukeran [Wellcome A.G., Bern, Switzerland] 5 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 14 with the some I.V. cytostatic drugs). Follow-up examinations were performed every 3 months during the first 3 years after mastectomy, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were randomized, of whom 232 who were fully eligible and contribute to the analyses presented here. No statistically significant difference in favor of adjuvant CMF over LMF emerges after a median follow-up duration of 11.2 years, for either overall survival (P = .15) or disease-free survival (P = .14). A consistent trend suggestive of a possible relative benefit associated with CMF should be pointed out. However, CMF presents a significantly worse toxicity profile as concerns hematologic parameters as well as alopecia, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: This prospective trial has not identified a statistically significant difference in disease-free survival or overall survival between the two adjuvant regimens LMF and CMF. Although a trend in favor of CMF has been observed in premenopausal patients, this has to be weighted against its definitely more pronounced toxicity profile.

Adult↗

Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5.

PURPOSE: Certain anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are associated with improved relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with the classic regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in women with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 1993, 710 pre- and perimenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14, epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8 (CEF) or CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8). On the basis of follow-up to May 1997 (median follow-up time, 59 months), there was a statistically significant improvement in RFS and OS for CEF compared with CMF. RESULTS: The trial results are now updated, with a median follow-up of 10 years for live patients. The 10-year RFS is 52% for patients who received CEF compared with 45% for CMF patients (hazard ratio [HR] for CMF v CEF = 1.31; stratified log-rank, P = .007). The 10-year OS for patients who received CEF and CMF are 62% and 58%, respectively (HR for CMF v CEF = 1.18; stratified log-rank, P = .085). The rates of acute leukemia have not changed since the original report, whereas the rates of congestive heart failure are slightly higher but acceptable (four patients [1.1%] in the CEF group v one patient [0.3%] in the CMF group). CONCLUSION: The previously demonstrated benefit of CEF compared with CMF adjuvant chemotherapy is maintained with longer follow-up in the MA5 trial.

Administration, Oral↗

Phase III evaluation of octreotide versus chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced exocrine pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.

There continues to be a need for new systemic approaches for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor activity of the somatostatin analogue octreotide to 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in a Phase III setting. Eighty-four patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and limited tumor volume were randomized to receive octreotide 200 microg three times daily or 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin. After the first 12 patients had been randomized to octreotide, we increased the dose in the remaining patients to 500 microg three times daily. This change was based on early reports in other studies, suggesting that our original dose may not have been effective and that higher doses of octreotide were well tolerated. A planned interim analysis performed after 84 patients were enrolled demonstrated inferior time to progression and survival for the patients randomized to octreotide. Further accrual to the octreotide arm of this protocol was therefore terminated. Octreotide in doses of 200-500 microg three times daily does not delay progression or extend survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer compared with treatment with 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin.

Adult↗

Studies on tetrahydrofuranyl-5-fluorouracils. 2. NMR studies of 1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-, 3-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-, and 1,3-bis(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracils.

Measurements of the 1H NMR spectra of the diastereoisomers of 1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil, 3-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil, and 1,3-bis(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil in the presence of tris[3-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1-hydroxyethylidene)-d-camphorato]europium(Eu(TFC)3) as a chiral shift reagent showed differences between the isomers in the chemical shift changes of the protons of C2'-H and C6-H etc.

Fluorouracil↗

[The concentration of 5-fluorouracil in blood and tissues of the patients with carcinoma of the cervix after administration of UFT and 5-fluorouracil].

We studied the concentrations of 5-fluorouracil in the serum and tissues of the patients with carcinoma of the cervix to whom UFT or 5-FU had been preoperatively administered. 5-FU concentration in the tumorous tissue showed a significantly high level in the UFT group (0.110 +/- 0.079 microgram/g), compared with the 5-FU group (0.052 +/- 0.042 microgram/g) (p less than 0.05). 5-Fluorouracil concentration in the serum and normal tissues showed a trend of being higher in the UFT group, although there was no significant difference. Thus, it is presumed that, in the cervical carcinoma, UFT has greater efficacy in producing high concentration of 5-fluorouracil in the tumor and elevating antitumor activity than 5-FU.

Adenocarcinoma↗

The therapeutic effects of orally administered 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil and 5-fluorouracil on experimental murine tumors.

The antitumor effects of three 5-fluorouracil-related compounds, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (FT-207) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) itself, on several experimental murine tumors were compared after oral administration. 5'-DFUR showed strong antitumor activity against the solid type of four kinds of tumors tested with a wide range of effective doses, and also showed moderate antitumor activity against three kinds of solid tumors with a narrow range of effective doses. 5'-DFUR was effective against a few kinds of ascites tumors. In general, the antitumor activity of FT-207 was not very strong, with narrow ranges of effective doses under the present conditions. 5-FU showed strong toxicity but at lower doses its antitumor effectiveness was almost the same as that of FT-207. When the doses were divided into three and the divided dose was given orally three times a day for five consecutive days to mice bearing L1210 leukemia, this modality (with any of the three drugs) enhanced the ILS of the mice by two to three times in the case of the ascites type but not the solid type of L1210. The chemotherapeutic index in oral treatment of the solid type of tumors was higher for 5'-DFUR than for FT-207 or 5-FU. The minimum lethal doses in oral administration for five consecutive days were about 3, 1.5 and 0.5 mmol/kg/day for 5'-DFUR, FT-207 and 5-FU, respectively. In conclusion, 5'-DFUR appeared to have stronger antitumor activity and less toxicity than FT-207 and 5-FU, and it is therefore expected to be clinically useful.

Animals↗

[A randomized controlled study to compare 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) and 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (Tegafur) for the prevention of post-operative recurrence of bladder cancer].

To evaluate the effect of 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU), a derivative of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in preventing postoperative recurrence of bladder cancer, a randomized controlled study with 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (Tegafur) as the reference standard was performed. HCFU was given orally 600 mg a day and Tegafur was given orally, 800 mg a day. The following results were obtained: Of 103 patients, 51 were given HCFU and 52 Tegafur, the non-recurrence rate in the group treated with HCFU was 70.8% after 1 year and 54.9% after 2 years of follow up, and that of the group treated with Tegafur was 56.5% and 46.2% respectively. The rate of non-recurrence in the HCFU group was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) than that of the Tegafur group during the period of follow up between 450 and 539 days. Of the 87 patients, who took the drugs for more than 90 days, the rate of non-recurrence in 43 patients receiving HCFU was 79.2% after 1 year and 60.4% after 2 years, compared to 62.5% and 50.0% respectively for 44 patients receiving Tegafur. The non-recurrence rate of the HCFU group was also significantly higher than that of the Tegafur group in the period between 450 and 539 days after operation (p less than 0.05). The incidence of side effects was 35.6% and 51.7% in HCFU and Tegafur patients, respectively. No significant difference of side effects was found between HCFU and Tegafur.

Administration, Oral↗

Postoperative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer by combining 5-fluorouracil infusion and 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil administration after curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the major malignant diseases and, recently, its incidence appears to be increasing. Surgical resectability is an important prognostic determinant; however, recurrent tumors are commonly noted, even after apparently curative surgery. Because such metastatic disease cannot be cured, better adjuvant therapies are urgently called for. METHODS: We studied the effect of postoperative chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusions and 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) oral administration for curatively resected Stage II to IV colorectal cancer. This study was prospectively randomized and controlled and 251 (93.3%) of 269 patients were determined to be candidates for statistical assessment. The inductive regimen for Group A included a total of 6 5-FU intravenous injections, 10 mg/kg, on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, 7, 8, and 9. For maintenance therapy, Group A also received oral HCFU, 300 mg daily for 52 weeks beginning 2 weeks after surgery. The regimen for Group B included only 5-FU injections of Group A. RESULTS: There were no differences in the prognostic factors or doses of 5-FU between Groups A and B. In addition, no difference was observed in the toxicity rate between the two groups. Group A, with 5-FU infusions plus oral HCFU administration, produced a reduction in the recurrence rate and a prolongation of the survival time for patients with rectal cancer. In a retrospective analysis, this protocol was also effective for patients with Stage III to IV, wall invasion-positive, and lymph node metastasis-positive colorectal cancers. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the combination of 5-FU infusions and the continuous oral administration of HCFU is a reasonable therapeutic approach for patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer and a high risk of recurrence.

Adult↗

A comparison of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil (CAF) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, prednisone (CMFVP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group project.

In an ongoing prospective randomized study, 113 evaluable patients have received either a three-drug combination that included cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) or a five-drug combination including cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine and prednisone (CMFVP) given intermittently 1 week out of 4. Responses (64%), median duration of response (32 weeks), and median duration of disease control (32 weeks) achieved with CAF were superior to those achieved with CMFVP (37%, 22 weeks, 17 weeks, respectively). Morbidity secondary to CAF was significant, with nausea and vomiting, malaise, total alopecia, and granulocytopenia being the main features.

Agranulocytosis↗

Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. A comparison of 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and mitomycin (FAM) with 5-fluorouracil, streptozotocin, and mitomycin (FSM).

One hundred ninety-six patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were randomized to receive one of two combination chemotherapy programs: FAM (5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin [doxorubicin], mitomycin) or FSM (5-fluorouracil, streptozotocin, mitomycin). Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Overall response rates for those with measurable disease (14% on FAM, 4% on FSM) were not significantly different (P = 0.07). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with FAM and FSM (median survivals of 26 and 18 weeks, respectively). Survival benefits of FAM were significant only for patients with measurable disease. Toxicity of both regimens was acceptable and comparable, aside from greater renal toxicity and more nausea and vomiting with FSM. The results failed to confirm the 35% to 40% response rates previously reported for FAM and FSM in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A randomized multicenter trial of cyclophosphamide, Novantrone and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

As of August 1984, 115 women with advanced breast cancer have been randomized to receive a combination of either cyclophosphamide, Novantrone (mitoxantrone) and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) or cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and 5-fluorouracil (CAF). Seventy-one percent of all patients were post-menopausal and 44% of CNF patients and 57% of CAF patients were estrogen receptor (ER) negative. Slightly over 30% of all patients had received hormonal therapy or chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting. Hematologic toxicity was similar in regard to platelet counts but slightly lower nadirs were experienced with CNF therapy than with CAF. However, there were fewer dosage decreases with CNF. Significantly less nausea and vomiting were observed with the CNF regimen compared to CAF. Moreover, alopecia was reduced appreciably in patients who received CNF. The response rate to CNF for the first 38 eligible and evaluable patients was 42%, and for 53 eligible and evaluable patients who received CAF the response rate was 45%, a non-significant difference. Median response durations were similar also, 140 days for CNF and 168 days for the CAF regimen. Time to treatment failure was similar for both regimens. CNF is an effective regimen for patients with advanced breast cancer, with less toxicity than CAF.

Adult↗

A comparison of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) in patients with advanced breast cancer.

The Southeastern Cancer Study Group, in a prospectively randomized study involving patients with advanced breast cancer, has compared a low dose intermittently administered five-drug regimen including cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) with an aggressively administered three-drug regimen including cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF). CAF induced more responses and more complete responses and a longer duration of disease control. However, only a marginal difference was demonstrated in overall survival between the two regimens (p = less than 0.10). Patients with a good risk pattern of metastases, i.e. those with nodular local chest wall recurrence, nodular pulmonary metastases, or bone-only metastases were more likely to achieve a response and survive longer than those with a poor risk pattern, i.e. lymphangitic pulmonary metastases, pleural effusion with chest wall ulceration, or widespread metastases, including hepatic. All of the differences between the two regimens were noted in the good risk pattern groups. CAF provided no additional benefit to patients presenting with poor risk patterns of metastases. Adriamycin-containing combinations may achieve a greater degree of tumor cell kill in certain subsets of patients with advanced breast cancer, but this provides only a marginal increase in survival.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in 69 cases of locally advanced (stage IIIb) breast cancer.

Sixty nine patients with a median age of 45 years, 62.3 per cent of whom were premenopausal, with locally advanced breast cancer (T 4, N 0-3, M 0; Stage IIIb) were treated with 3 cycles of either neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil, being the CAF group: 36 patients, or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil, being the CMF group: 33 patients. Patients achieving complete response or with residual disease of less than 2 cm in diameter received radical radiotherapy while those with more residual disease underwent radical mastectomy. Nine cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were administered. Complete responses and disease control by radiotherapy with complete breast preservation were more frequently observed after CAF than CMF, being 25 per cent vs 3 per cent (p = 0.025) and 48.5 per cent vs 12 per cent (p = 0.002), respectively. Overall response rates, adverse effects, disease control following radiotherapy/surgery, local relapses and metastases were similar for both regimes. Relapsing patients were young, with a median age of 38 years, 68.4 per cent of relapses occurred at metastatic sites and 42 per cent of relapses occurred during adjuvant chemotherapy. This study suggests that in locally advanced breast cancer, a greater proportion of patients can be rendered disease free after neoadjuvant CAF and radiotherapy compared to neoadjuvant CMF and radiotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗