Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Exenatide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Update in the pharmacologic treatment of diabetes mellitus: focus on pramlintide and exenatide.

There are now more than 20 million people in America with diabetes mellitus (DM), and the prevalence of this illness continues to increase especially in those with type 2 DM. Over the past decade, research in the area of DM treatment has focused on pharmacologic approaches to modifying glucose metabolism as well as on lifestyle interventions to prevent and manage DM. Pharmacologic research has been guided by an improved understanding of the human physiology of glucose metabolism, allowing for development of new hormonal drug therapies and improved insulin formulations. As a result, there are several new pharmacologic treatments now available or on the horizon for DM. In this article, the authors review the first of the new hormonal therapies for DM, with a focus on information that will be useful for diabetes educators including the medication actions, side effects, patient counseling points, monitoring, and place in therapy in comparison to existing DM treatments. This series on new therapies has been divided into 3 parts, with this first part devoted to an update on the new incretin mimetic and amylin analog agents recently approved for use in DM. Subsequent parts in this series will focus on the new insulin products and oral therapies available or soon to be available. Cases will be used to assist with understanding the type of patient who will benefit from each of these new therapies.

Amyloid↗
PubMed2006

Incretin mimetics as a novel therapeutic option for hepatic steatosis.

BACKGROUND: Fat accumulation in the liver or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is regarded as a key pathogenic factor and component of the metabolic syndrome. It was reported that administration of the incretin mimetic exenatide reversed hepatic steatosis in an obese mouse model. We had the opportunity to study the effect of additional exenatide administration on liver fat content in a patient with type 2 diabetes. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old male with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes was treated with exenatide in addition to metformin monotherapy. Following 44 weeks of exenatide therapy, mean the liver fat measured by liver spectroscopy declined from 15.8% to 4.3%. This dramatic decrease in liver fat was accompanied by significant beneficial changes in several cardiovascular disease risk factors and improvement of all liver enzymes, in particular alanine aminotransferase, the most important marker of liver steatosis. CONCLUSION: This case report suggests that the incretin mimetic exenatide decreases hepatic fat accumulation and may play a role in the future treatment of NAFLD, and the associated insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors in an ever-growing high-risk population.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2↗
PubMed2004

Incretin mimetics as emerging treatments for type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To review the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy of glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) and the incretin mimetics exenatide and liraglutide in clinical studies. DATA SOURCES: Primary literature obtained via MEDLINE (1966-April 2004) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-April 2004) searches; abstracts obtained from meeting sources and manufacturers. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language studies and abstracts evaluating GLP-1, exenatide, and liraglutide in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes were reviewed. Data from animal studies were also included if human data were not available. Primary and review articles related to the physiology, development, and evaluation of GLP-1s were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: GLP-1, exenatide (exendin-4, AC2993), and liraglutide (NN2211) are incretin mimetics that have been shown in human studies to be an effective treatment to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Mechanisms by which these compounds improve glycemic control include enhancing glucose-dependent pancreatic secretion of insulin in response to nutrient intake, inhibiting glucagon secretion, delaying gastric emptying, and promoting early satiety. GLP-1 has been shown to promote pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and improve beta-cell function and lifespan. Reported adverse effects of exenatide and liraglutide include nausea, vomiting, and transient headache, as well as increased risk of hypoglycemia when used with sulfonylureas. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical studies show that GLP-1, exenatide, and liraglutide improve glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes through unique mechanisms not available with current pharmaceutical products. Ongoing Phase III studies will help to further position these compounds as treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

cAMP Dose-dependently prevents palmitate-induced apoptosis by both protein kinase A- and cAMP-guanine nucleotide exchange factor-dependent pathways in beta-cells.

Lipid accumulation in pancreatic beta-cells is thought to cause its dysfunction and/or destruction via apoptosis. Our studies show that incubation of the beta-cell line RINm5F with the saturated free fatty acids (FFA) palmitate caused apoptosis based on increases in caspase 3 activity, Annexin V staining, and cell death. Furthermore, exposure of RINm5F cells to cAMP-increasing agents, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), and forskolin completely abolished palmitate-mediated caspase 3 activity and significantly inhibited Annexin V staining and cell death. The cyclic AMP analogs cpt-cAMP and dibutyryl-cAMP mimicked the protective effects of IBMX and forskolin, suggesting that cAMP is the mediator of the anti-apoptotic effects. The protective action of IBMX and forskolin was rapid and did not appear to require gene transcription or new protein synthesis. However, these protective effects were clearly independent of protein kinase A (PKA) because of the lack of inhibition by the PKA inhibitors H-89 and KT5720. In attempts to identify this PKA-independent mechanism, we found that the newly developed cAMP analog 8CPT-2Me-cAMP, which selectively activates the cAMP-dependent guanine nucleotide exchange factor (cAMP-GEF) pathway, mimicked the protective effects of IBMX and forskolin, suggesting that the cAMP-GEF pathway is involved. In addition, both glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) and its receptor agonist, Exenatide, inhibited palmitate-mediated caspase 3 activation in a dose-dependent manner. Unexpectedly, H-89 partially reversed the protective effects of GLP-1 and Exenatide, suggesting that PKA may play a role in the protective effects of these incretins. To explain these seemingly conflicting results, we demonstrated that low concentrations of cAMP produced by GLP-1 and Exenatide preferentially activate the PKA pathway, whereas higher cAMP concentrations produced by IBMX and forskolin activate the more dominant cAMP-GEF pathway. Taken together, these results indicate that intracellular concentrations of cAMP may play a key role in determining divergent signaling pathways that lead to antiapoptotic responses.

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗
PubMed2026

Pharmacological Interventions for Weight Reduction in Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Significant weight gain is a concerning adverse effect of antipsychotic medications experienced by patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Its high prevalence and significant contribution to cardiometabolic morbidity in this population warrant better consensus on the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain and related comorbidity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between pharmacological interventions and changes in body weight among antipsychotic-treated patients with SSDs. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal were searched up to December 5, 2025. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials examining any pharmacological intervention for weight reduction in antipsychotic-treated patients with SSDs were included. No restrictions to study duration were applied. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A systematic review and frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted. Certainty in the evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool. The first round of data analysis took place between May 2025 to November 2025 and was updated in December 2025. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in body weight following treatment with pharmacological agent vs placebo or standard care. Secondary outcomes included other anthropometric and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 95 studies examining 39 individual pharmacological interventions were included in this review (pooled N = 5898). The network meta-analysis found that semaglutide (mean difference [MD], -10.98 kg; 95% CI, -13.33 to -8.62; k = 3; moderate certainty), liraglutide (MD, -5.43 kg; 95% CI, -8.54 to -2.33; k = 2; moderate certainty), topiramate (MD, -3.95 kg; 95% CI, -5.89 to -2.02; k = 5; moderate certainty), metformin (MD, -3.86 kg; 95% CI, -5.02 to -2.70; k = 16; moderate certainty), and exenatide (MD, -2.97 kg; 95% CI, -5.83 to -0.11; k = 3; moderate certainty) were associated with the most significant reductions in body weight compared to placebo. Other interventions including ramelteon, nizatidine, and aripiprazole were also found to be associated with weight-reducing effects but with very low certainty of evidence. Clinically meaningful weight change of 5% or greater was observed with semaglutide and metformin. Beneficial effects on other metabolic outcomes were also noted with several of the medications, and there were no major concerns with gastrointestinal adverse effects or leaving the study early (ie, dropouts) between interventions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review and network meta-analysis found substantial variability in weight-related outcomes across pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic-treated individuals with SSDs. Semaglutide, liraglutide, topiramate, metformin, and exenatide were associated with the greatest reductions in body weight and were supported by the highest-certainty evidence, providing guidance for clinicians managing antipsychotic-associated weight gain.

Humans↗