Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ESTRUS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Comparison of two estrus synchronization and resynchronization treatments in lactating dairy cows.

Reproductive performance in cows following synchronization of estrus with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (IVD) has varied with the length of treatment, cyclic status and prolonged return to estrus intervals in some cows following first AI. The objective of this study was to compare two methods of synchronizing and resynchronizing estrus on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Cows were treated with an IVD (Day 0) for 7 days (n = 350) or 8 days (n = 350), cloprostenol (0.5 mg i.m.) at the time of device removal and estradiol benzoate (EB) at the time of device insertion (1.5mg i.m.), and again 9 days later (1.0 mg i.m.). Cows were also resynchronized starting on Days 23 and 46 by reinsertion of IVDs for either 7 or 8 days and treatment with EB (1mg i.m.) at the time of device insertion and again 9 days later. Cows were inseminated on detection of estrus for 4 days after removal of devices at each of the synchronized estrous cycles. No significant differences in reproductive performance were detected between each treatment throughout the study period. Synchrony of estrus was more precise at the first and second estrus after treatment with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days. Cows classified as anestrous had lower reproductive performance than cows classified as cycling and had longer intervals to estrus at the second (P < 0.001) and third estrus (P < 0.06), but not at the first estrus (P = 0.09). Mean time to onset of estrus after IVD removal was less in cows treated with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days at each synchronized estrus (P < 0.01). More Holstein-Friesian cows were classified as non-pregnant and not detected in estrus than crossbreed cows (15.7%, 54/343 versus 9.0%, 24/266; [P < 0.05). The results of the study suggested that the main effects of the treatments that were used to synchronize and resynchronize estrus were to alter the timing and synchrony of estrus without affecting fertility.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed1997

Estrus synchronization in dairy goats: use of fluorogestone acetate vaginal sponges or norgestomet ear implants.

The ultimate aim of any estrus synchronization method is to allow artificial insemination at a predetermined time after the end of treatment. This requires a very tight synchronization of estrus which is not observed in goats after administration of the usual fluorogestone acetate (FGA)/prostaglandin (PG) F2 alpha/equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) treatment. The possibility to improve the synchronization of estrus and luteinizing hormone (LH) peak with different progestagens (FGA versus norgestomet) and routes of administration (vaginal sponge versus subcutaneous ear implant) was evaluated in two experiments where goats received one of three progestagen treatments: (1) a vaginal sponge impregnated with 45 mg of FGA, (2) a half-implant of norgestomet, or (3) a whole implant containing 3 mg of norgestomet. The progestagens were left in place for 11 days and intramuscular injections of 400 or 500 IU of eCG (according to milk yield) and 50 micrograms of an analogue of PGF2 alpha (cloprostenol) were given 48 h prior to progestagen removal. In Experiment 1, 117 cycling goats were checked for the time of onset of estrus, preovulatory LH peak and ovulation rate following estrus synchronization treatment. Goats treated with half-implants came into estrus earlier than those receiving vaginal sponges (27.8 +/- 5.0 h vs. 33.0 +/- 6.6 h, respectively; P < 0.05). No effect of progestagen priming was observed on the variability of the onset of estrus. However, the interval between the time of onset of estrus and LH peak was more variable (P < 0.05) in goats treated with half-implants. In Experiment 2, 170 non-cycling goats were monitored for the time of onset of estrus, percentage of females ovulating, fertility and prolificacy after estrus induction treatment and artificial insemination with frozen-thawed semen performed 24 h after the onset of estrus. No effect of progestagen treatment was observed either on the time or the variability of onset of estrus. The percentage of goats ovulating and overall fertility rate were higher (P < 0.05) in goats receiving vaginal sponges (98.2% and 75.0%, respectively) than those treated with half-implants (81.8% and 45.5%, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed, for the same parameters, in animals receiving implants (86.3% and 58.8%, respectively). In conclusion, estrus synchronization with a norgestomet implant or half-implant did not reduce the variability in the onset of estrus and LH peak. The fertility tended to be lower in goats treated with a whole implant and was significantly decreased in goats which received a half-implant.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Prostaglandin F(2)alpha usage in a dairy reproduction program for treatment of unobserved estrus, pyometra and ovarian luteal cysts.

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of 223 prostaglandin F(2)alpha (PGF) treatments given to lactating Holstein and Jersey cows over a 44-mo period. The cows were part of a commercial dairy herd. Treated cows were given PGF (25 mg i.m.) because they had not been observed in estrus or because they had been diagnosed as having a luteal cyst or pyometra. Outcome of treatments was assessed for frequency of response to treatment (the detection of estrus), time interval to detection and pregnancy outcome of breedings at PGF induced estrus. Of the 223 administrations of PGF, 70% (156 223 ) were given for unobserved estrus, 12.1% (27 223 ) were given for cystic ovarian disease and 15.2% (34 223 ) were given for pyometra. Estrus was detected in 55.3% (120 217 ) of cows over a period of 36 to 130 hours after PGF administration. Interval to estrus and response rates were not influenced by the reason for treatment. Mean time interval to response was 79.1 h. Time interval for response was affected by season (P < 0.01) housing location (P < 0.01) and lactation number (P < 0.05). Insemination was performed following 157 of the treatments. For cows treated for unobserved estrus, insemination was performed in response to estrus or at 80 h if no estrus had been previously seen. Of this group, 39.7% (58 146 ) failed to show estrus and were inseminated at 80 h. Reinsemination was required for 22.7% (20 88 ) of the cows that manifested estrus following insemination at 80 h. Overall conception rate was 41.4% (65 157 ). Cows inseminated in response to estrus had a 53.4% (47 88 ) conception rate, and appointment bred (80 h) cows had a 20.7% (12 58 ) conception rate. Factors significantly influencing conception were response to PGF administration (P < 0.05), season (P < 0.01) and lactation number (P < 0.01). It was concluded that estrus detection efficiency affects the outcome of PGF administration and that conception rates resulting from 80 h breeding when no estrus is observed may be unacceptably low.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

Artificial insemination following observational versus electronic methods of estrus detection in red deer hinds (Cervus elephus).

The objectives were to determine the efficacy of the HeatWatch (HW) electronic estrus detection system for monitoring behavioral estrus (including duration and intensity) in red deer hinds and to evaluate pregnancy rate to AI after detected estrus. Red deer hinds (Cervus elephus; n = 50) were allocated into two treatment groups: AI following synchronization (CIDR/PMSG) and observed estrus (induced estrus group: IE; n = 25) or AI following the detection of natural estrus (NE; n = 25) without hormonal treatment. Hinds were fitted with two HeatWatch (HW) electronic estrus detection transmitters, one above the tail (bottom) and one between the tuber coxae of the pelvic girdle (top), and visual observations for mounting activity began with the aid of young sterile red deer stags (18 months old) fitted with marking harnesses. Hinds in both groups were inseminated (10-12h after observed estrus) with frozen-thawed red deer semen using a transvaginal/cervical AI approach. Following a 26-day period of AI, hinds were placed with a mature fertile stag for an additional 30-day natural breeding period. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 57 and 86 days after the start of AI. While the hinds were housed with the young stags, 82% were detected in estrus by visual appraisal of stag crayon marks, but only 32% of these were detected by HW. In contrast, in the hinds housed with the mature stag, 93% detected in estrus by crayon marks were also detected by HW. The top HW transmitter consistently recorded more mounts (P < 0.05) than the bottom transmitter. The pregnancy rate was numerically better in IE versus NE hinds (42% versus 29%, P > 0.10). In summary, there were no differences (P > 0.10) in the intensity (number) or duration of mounts (detected by HW) during estrus in IE versus NE hinds, and HW was most effective in detecting estrus in the presence of a heavier, mature stag versus a younger stag. When used in combination with transvaginal AI, an overall first-service pregnancy rate of 36.6% was achieved with AI of frozen-thawed semen in red deer hinds following detected estrus.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Effect of age and physical or fence-line boar exposure on estrus and ovulation response in prepubertal gilts administered PG600.

Boar exposure has been used for estrus induction of prepubertal gilts, but has limited effect on estrus synchronization within 7 d of introduction. In contrast, PG600 (400 IU of PMSG and 200 IU of hCG; Intervet, Millsboro, DE) is effective for induction of synchronized estrus, but the response is often variable. It is unknown whether boar exposure before PG600 administration might improve the efficiency of estrus induction of prepubertal gilts. In Exp. 1, physical or fence-line boar contact for 19 d was evaluated for inducing puberty in gilts before administration of i.m. PG600. Exp. 2 investigated whether 4-d boar exposure and gilt age influenced response to PG600. In Exp. 1, 150-d-old prepubertal gilts were randomly allotted to receive fence-line (n = 27, FBE) or physical (n = 29, PBE) boar exposure. Gilts were provided exposure to a mature boar for 30 min daily. All gilts received PG600 at 169 d of age. Estrous detection continued for 20 d after injection. In Exp. 2, prepubertal gilts were allotted by age group (160 or 180 d) to receive no boar exposure (NBE) or 4 d of fence-line boar exposure (BE) for 30 min daily before receiving PG600 either i.m. or s.c. Following PG600 administration, detection for estrus occurred twice-daily using fence-line boar exposure for 7 d. Results of Exp. 1 indicated no differences between FBE and PBE on estrus (77%), age at puberty (170 d), interval from PG600 to estrus (4 d), gilts ovulating (67%), or ovulation rate (12 corpora lutea, CL). Results from Exp. 2 indicated no effect of age group on estrus (55%) and days from PG600 to estrus (4 d). A greater (P < 0.05) proportion of BE gilts expressed estrus (65 vs. 47%), had a shorter (P < 0.05) interval from PG600 to estrus (3.6 vs. 4.3 d), and had decreased (P < 0.05) age at estrus (174 vs. 189 d) compared with NBE. Ovulation rate was greater (P < 0.05) in the BE group for the 180-d-old gilts (12.7 vs. 11.9 CL) compared with the NBE group. However, age group had no effect on ovulation (77%) or ovulation rate (12 CL). Collectively, these results indicate that physical boar contact may not be necessary when used in conjunction with PG600 to induce early puberty. The administration of PG600 to 180-d-old gilts in conjunction with 4 d prior fence-line boar exposure may improve induction of estrus, ovulation, and decrease age at puberty.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Development of an estrus synchronization protocol for beef cattle with short-term feeding of melengestrol acetate: 7-11 synch.

An estrus synchronization protocol (7-11 Synch) was developed to synchronize the first follicular wave and timing of ovulation in postpartum beef cows. In Exp. 1, follicular development and timing of ovulation in response to the following protocol were evaluated. Beef heifers (n = 12) and cows (n = 6), at random stages of the estrous cycle, were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA; .5 mg x animal(-1) x d(-1)) for 7 d and injected with PGF2alpha (PG; 25 mg) on the last day of MGA. A second injection of PG was administered 11 d after cessation of MGA. After the second injection of PG, estrus was synchronized in 6/12 heifers and 3/6 cows. The interval to estrus in heifers and cows was 54 and 64 h, respectively (P > .10). All animals exhibiting estrus ovulated first-wave follicles. Animals that failed to respond to the second injection of PG were in estrus later than 6 d after cessation of MGA and had corpora lutea that were unresponsive to the injection of PG. Based on the variation in interval to estrus following the first PG injection on the last day of MGA feeding in Exp. 1, an injection of GnRH (100 microg) was added to the protocol 4 d after the cessation of MGA to ensure ovulation or luteinization of dominant follicles and synchronization of first-wave follicular development. This revised protocol was termed "7-11 Synch." In Exp. 2, two estrus synchronization protocols were compared. Multiparous beef cows were stratified by breed and postpartum interval and randomly assigned to the 7-11 Synch (n = 44) or Select Synch protocols (GnRH injection followed by PG injection 7 d later; n = 45). Timing of estrus after the last PG injection (0 h) ranged from 42 to 102 h in the 7-11 Synch group and -30 to 114 h in the Select Synch group. Eight cows (18%) in the Select Synch group exhibited estrus 30 h before to 18 h after PG. Synchronized estrus peaked between 42 and 66 h after the last PG injection, and a maximum number of cows were in estrus at 54 h for both treatment groups. Synchrony of estrus from 42 to 66 h was greater (P < .05) in 7-11 Synch (91%: 41/44) than in Select Synch cows (69%: 31/45). Artificial insemination pregnancy rate from 42 to 66 h was greater (P < .05) in the 7-11 Synch group (66%: 29/44) than in the Select Synch group (40%: 18/45). In summary, the 7-11 Synch protocol improved synchrony of estrus without reducing fertility. This protocol has potential future application for fixed-time AI in beef cattle production systems.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Effect of GnRH pretreatment on reproductive performance of postpartum suckled beef cows following synchronization of estrus using GnRH and PGF2alpha.

The effect of GnRH pretreatment on estrus detection rate, precision of estrus, and reproductive performance of postpartum beef cows synchronized to estrus using GnRH and PGF2alpha was evaluated. In Exp. 1, Angus cows (n = 87) were randomly assigned by parity, postpartum interval, and body condition score (BCS) to receive either 1) GnRH on d -7 and PGF2alpha on d 0 (GP) or 2) the GP treatment and an additional injection of GnRH on d -16 (GGP). Estrus detection and AI were conducted twice daily from d -3 to d 3. At 72 h after PGF2alpha, all animals not previously detected in estrus were bred by AI and received a concurrent injection of GnRH (TAI). Synchronized pregnancy rates were numerically increased (P = 0.15) in cows treated with GGP (55%) compared with those on the GP treatment (44%). In Exp. 2, 1,276 spring-calving, suckled beef cows in nine herds were randomized to treatments as described for Exp. 1, except that the initial GnRH injection for the GGP treatment was administered on d -14. Herd affected all indicators of reproductive performance (P < 0.05). The percentage of animals detected in estrus prematurely (d -3 to d 0; 7%) was not affected by treatment. Estrus response rate was influenced by postpartum interval (< 60 vs > or = 60; 61 vs 73%; P < 0.01) and a three-way interaction of parity, BCS, and treatment (P < 0.01). Within animals with a BCS > or = 5.5, the GGP treatment tended to increase the detection of estrus in primiparous cows (GP vs GGP; 76 vs 91%; P = 0.11) and decrease detection in multiparous cows (GP vs GGP; 78 vs 72%; P < 0.10). However, because conception rate to TAI in animals with a BCS > or = 5.5 was greater (P < 0.05) in the GGP than in the GP group (28 vs 8%, respectively), this interaction was interpreted to represent a shift in interval to estrus induced by the GGP treatment, rather than a reduction in the synchronization of ovarian function. Conception rates of animals inseminated to an observed estrus did not differ among treatments (P = 0.15). Synchronized pregnancy rate tended (P = 0.06) to be greater in GGP- (53%) than in GP-treated animals (47%). In conclusion, pretreatment with GnRH tended to increase pregnancy rates during a 6-d synchronization period, primarily through enhanced conception rates of cows bred by TAI. In contrast to our hypothesis, GnRH pretreatment did not increase the percentage of animals detected in estrus or the precision of estrus expression.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed2005

Effects of boar contact and housing conditions on estrus expression in sows.

In this paper, the authors review the effects of boar contact and different components of boar presence on onset and expression of estrus in weaned sows. Evidence is presented that boar contact may influence LH release, onset of follicle development and timing of ovulation after weaning. Once the sow is in estrus it is important that she shows estrous behavior, because her expression of estrus determines whether she will be inseminated. Boar contact or components thereof affect expression of estrus in sows. There are distinct differences between different components of boar contact in their effectiveness in the induction of estrous behavior (standing response) in sows. Habituation to boars (due to frequency of boar contact or housing of boars near sows) also affects estrus expression in sows. It is important to inseminate sows at the correct moment relative to ovulation. The use of different estrus detection protocols (e.g., by giving sows different levels of boar stimuli during estrus detection) may result in the definition of distinct periods of estrus that may help to predict the moment of ovulation. However, results to date are not very encouraging. Besides boar stimuli, the housing conditions of sows may affect onset of estrus and estrus expression. This paper focuses on social sow-to-sow interactions. The effects of group housing (as compared to individual housing) on onset of estrus and expression of estrus are equivocal. These effects likely depend on factors like aggression between pen mates, reproductive status of pen mates and social rank of sows within the group.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Effect of biostimulation on the expression of estrus in postpartum Angus cows.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of biostimulation by bull exposure on the expression of estrus in postpartum Angus cows. Ninety Angus cows and their calves were allocated by parity and body frame to three pens (30/pen). From 1-week post partum, one epididectomized mature Angus bull was placed with Groups A and B (BE), whereas Group C served as a Control (NE). Data for duration of estrus (DE), total mounts received (TMR), and intensity of estrus (IE) were recorded using HeatWatch. At either the first or second postpartum estrus, there were no differences between BE and NE cows for DE, TMR and IE. However, the period after onset of estrus, cow within treatment and the interaction treatment by period exerted a significant influence on IE. Overall, the greatest IE (P<0.0001) was observed during the first two periods (6h). At the first postpartum estrus, IE tended (P<0.11) to be greater in BE than NE cows during the first 3h after onset of estrus. However, IE was greater (P<0.02) in NE cows than BE cows during 4-6h after onset of estrus. At the second postpartum estrus, IE did not differ between BE and NE cows during the first 3h after onset of estrus. However, from 4 to 9h after onset of estrus, IE was greater (P<006) in NE cows than BE cows. From the results of this study, it was concluded that DE, TMR and IE were not influenced by biostimulation. However, the manner in which mounting activities were distributed across the duration of estrus was influenced by the presence of bulls.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Use of vaginal electrical resistance (VER) to predict estrus and ovarian activity, its relationship with plasma progesterone and its use for insemination in buffaloes.

In three experiments we studied the baseline and changes in VER during different natural estrous cycle stages (n=146) in ovarian structures and in plasma progesterone during estrus induced by prostaglandin injection (n=16) and the VER at insemination (n=90) in an attempt to predict estrus, ovulation and the best VER range for inseminating buffaloes for optimum conception. The baseline VER was classified on the basis of ovarian findings and estrous cycle stages. The mean VER during estrus, metestrus, diestrus, proestrus and anestrus was 32.68 +/- 0.46, 41.26 +/- 1.17, 50.23 +/- 0.55, 43.20 +/- 0.64 and 55.86 +/- 0.57 ohms, respectively. There was a significant difference (P<0.01) between the VER except those between metestrus and proestrus. The ANOVA for VER over estrous cycle stages showed a highly significant (P<0.01) effect of stage of estrous cycle on VER in buffaloes. The percent decrease in VER was more pronounced from diestrus to estrus. In the second part of the study plasma progesterone profiles and the appearance of estrus in buffaloes induced to estrus using two dose schedules and routes of PGF2alpha administration showed that luteolysis and estrus induction was slower in the 10 mg i.v.s.m. route (Intra Vulvo Submucosal) (only 60% animals evinced estrus in 48 to 72 hours) as compared to the 25 mg i.m. route (83.33% evidenced estrus in 48 to 72 hrs). Fall in plasma progesterone was synchronous to a fall in VER, the correlation (0.65) between them being positive and significant (P<0.01). After ovulation the VER started rising, showing a distinct relationship between VER and ovulation. By using VER, an additional 36.6% of the buffaloes could be detected in estrus. In the third part of the study, insemination of buffaloes induced to estrus (n=11) and normal-estrus buffaloes (n=79) showed that the overall conception rates to single insemination when the buffaloes were inseminated at the VER range of 26 to 30, 31 to 35 and 36 to 40 ohms were 81.48, 58.97 and 16.66%, respectively. Buffaloes showing VER from 31 to 35 ohms and 36 to 40 ohms also evidenced atypical and Null fern pattern in the cervicovaginal mucus. The study proved that VER can be used successfully to predict the stage of estrous cycle, ovarian status and ovulation; and insemination at a low VER distinctly improves the conception rates in buffaloes.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Estrous cycle characteristics and response to estrus synchronization in mammoth asses (Equus asinus americanus).

Breeding records from a herd of mammoth asses (Equus asinus americanus) maintained on pasture in southeast Texas from 1990 to 1998 were reviewed. Jennies were pasture or hand mated, and estrus was either observed while the jennies were on pasture or when exposed to a jack after being penned. Eighty-one estrus periods and 43 diestrus intervals were recorded in 33 jennies over 4 seasons of the year (January-March, April-June, July-September, and October-December). Estrous cycle length and the duration of estrus were similar among seasons. Over all seasons, estrous cycle length was 23.3 +/- 2.6 d, duration of estrus was 5.9 +/- 2.1 d, and diestrus length was 17.4 +/- 2.6 d (mean +/- SD). During these same 9 yr, 58 injections of PGF2 alpha (5 mg, i.m.) were administered to 38 jennies without regard to stage of estrous cycle. Seventy-six percent (44/58) of the jennies showed signs of estrus after PGF2 alpha treatment, with an interval to estrus of 4.4 +/- 1.6 d and a duration of estrus of 5.6 +/- 1.7 d. Two estrus synchronization schemes were also assessed. Trial 1 was performed in October to November 1996, and Trial 2 was performed in February to March 1998. In Trial 1 (Group PE + PGF, n = 10), each jenny was injected intramuscularly once daily for 10 d with 150 mg progesterone and 10 mg estradiol-17 beta in sesame oil, and PGF2 alpha (10 mg) was injected intramuscularly on the last day of treatment. In Trial 2 (Group PGF-2X, n = 11), each jenny was injected intramuscularly twice, 16 d apart, with 10 mg PGF2 alpha. All Group PE + PGF jennies responded to treatment. One jenny in Group PGF-2X did not respond to either injection of PGF2 alpha, while 2 jennies responded to the first but not the second PGF2 alpha injection (8 of 11 jennies returned to estrus and ovulated after the second PGF2 alpha injection). Duration of estrus was 6.8 +/- 1.9 d for Group PE + PGF and 7.1 +/- 1.8 d for Group PGF-2X jennies. Interval to estrus and interval to ovulation following the last treatment were 9.0 +/- 0.9 d and 14.5 +/- 1.7 d, respectively, in Group PE + PGF jennies, and 4.5 +/- 0.9 d and 10.4 +/- 1.8 d, respectively, for Group PGF-2X jennies. In summary, estrous cycle characteristics of mammoth asses are similar to those reported for standard jennies, and estrus synchronization schemes used in horses are effective in mammoth asses.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacodynamic model of the rat estrus cycle in relation to endocrine disruptors.

Several strains of laboratory rats have a high background incidence of mammary tumors and develop a persistent, anovulatory estrus condition at about 12 mo of age. The increased tumor incidence is believed to be associated with elevated estradiol (E2) and prolactin during the period of persistent estrus. A pharmacodynamic estrus cycle (PD-EC) model for the Sprague-Dawley rats has been developed in an attempt to analyze the physiological basis of early-onset persistent estrus and to examine the potential sites of interactions in the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis for endocrine-modulating xenobiotics that accelerate the onset of persistent estrus. This initial estrus cycle model focused solely on cyclical changes in E2 and luteinizing hormone (LH). An LH surge was scheduled when a hypothetical estrus cycle-related protein (EC-RP) under transcriptional control by the E2 receptor reached a critical concentration. In the model, aging-related cumulative hypothalamic E2 exposure impaired the LH surge by reducing the rate of production of the EC-RP. The progressively decreasing intercycle resynthesis rate leads first to longer, variable-length cycles and finally to persistent estrus at about 12 mo of age. This model construct is consistent with early-onset persistent estrus related to neonatal E2 exposures, with acyclicity associated with high-dose E2 exposure in the adult, and with persistent estrus conditions associated with exposures to xenobiotic endocrine modulators that are either weak E2 antagonists or weak E2 agonists. With further development these pharmacodynamic estrus cycle models should be useful in aiding risk assessments for compounds causing mammary-tissue tumors associated with persistent estrus states.

Aging↗
PubMed1982

Pulsatile administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone to lactating sows: endocrine changes associated with induction of fertile estrus.

Two experiments were conducted to determine whether pulsatile administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) would induce estrus and ovulation in lactating, anestrous sows. In each experiment, six lactating sows received GnRH, i.v. (2.5 micrograms every 2 h, Exp. 1; 1.5 micrograms every h, Exp. 2) until 24 h after estrus or 7 days, whichever came first. In Experiment 1, three of six GnRH-treated lactating sows exhibited estrus 4.0 +/- 0.0 days after GnRH treatment began. All three GnRH-treated sows conceived at the estrus induced during lactation. Patterns of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in serum around estrus were similar between GnRH-treated sows that exhibited estrus during lactation and weaned control sows. However, in GnRH-treated sows that did not show estrus, a preovulatory-like surge in FSH, but not in LH, occurred on Day 4 of GnRH treatment. Prolactin concentrations in serum dropped from 25.6 +/- 2.4 ng/ml during lactation to less than 6 ng/ml within 12 h after weaning (Exp. 1). In Experiment 2, all six GnRH-treated sows exhibited estrus 3.8 +/- 0.3 days after initiation of GnRH treatment, and five sows conceived. Patterns of LH and FSH during lactation were similar between GnRH-treated and lactating control sows during the first 3 days of GnRH treatment. During 3 days before estrus, LH concentrations were lower (P less than 0.05) and FSH concentrations tended to be higher (P less than 0.20) in lactating GnRH-treated sows than in control sows whose litters had been weaned. Concentrations of estradiol in GnRH-treated sows were greater than those in controls during lactation but were similar in both groups on the day of estrus. In both experiments, concentrations of progesterone were greater in GnRH-treated than in control sows prior to and during estrus. We conclude that, despite some differences in hormone secretion between GnRH-treated lactating sows and sows with litters weaned, pulsatile administration of GnRH caused requisite endocrine changes for fertile estrus during lactation.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Relationship between circulating progesterone and conception at the first postpartum estrus in young primiparous beef cows.

The objective of this study was to determine whether patterns of change in concentration of progesterone in circulation of primiparous beef cows were related to conception rates at the first postpartum estrus. Data were collected over 2 yr from crossbred primiparous 2-yr-old cows (n = 77). Cows were artificially inseminated when estrus was detected between 3 and 20 (yr 1) or 3 and 23 (yr 2) wk after parturition. Cows were exposed to intact bulls for 32 (yr 1) or 21 d (yr 2) after the periods of AI, and estrus detection also occurred during the period when natural mating occurred. After parturition, blood samples were collected twice weekly to determine time of transient (less than 1 wk) and sustained increases (more than 1 wk) in progesterone of more than 1 ng/mL of serum. Mean times from parturition to transient increase in progesterone, first estrus, conception, and sustained increase in progesterone were 91, 100, 108, and 105 d, respectively. Sixty-four percent of the cows conceived as a result of AI at the first estrus that was detected after parturition, 32% conceived at a subsequent estrus, and 4% failed to conceive. In 31.1% of the cows, a transient increase in progesterone was not detected before the first estrus after calving. Conception as a result of AI at the first estrus after calving was less if a transient increase in progesterone did not precede estrus (76 vs 41%; P < .01). These data indicate that the majority of cows have increases in progesterone before the first postpartum estrus. If the transient pre-estrus increase in progesterone occurs in postpartum cows, there seems to be an enhanced conception rate as compared with cows without the increase in progesterone before their first estrus following parturition.

Aging↗
PubMed2004

Flehmen response in bull: role of vaginal mucus and other body fluids of bovine with special reference to estrus.

The present investigation was carried out with a view to evaluate the frequency of Flehmen behaviour in bull in response to body fluids of cows in various stages of the estrous cycle, in the context of estrus detection. The study was performed on free moving bulls under natural conditions. Samples of vaginal mucus, saliva, faeces and milk of pro-estrus, estrus and di-estrus stages collected from donor cows were rubbed individually onto the genital regions of non-estrus animals (dummy cows) and the bulls were observed for 30 min for assessment of Flehmen behaviour. The duration of Flehmen behaviour shown by bulls was maximum towards the dummy cows receiving estrus sample. Such Flehmen behaviour, however, did not occur in bulls in response to the cows receiving samples of other stages. The statistical significance was higher (P < 0.001) in exhibiting repeated Flehmen behaviour towards estrus as compared to those of pro-estrus and di-estrus. Among the various body fluids tested, the exhibition of Flehmen behaviour was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in response to estrus vaginal fluid. No response was observed on dummy cows (control) to which only water was applied on the genital region. The results suggest that vaginal mucus may act as an additional/secondary source along with urine in eliciting copulatary behaviour and executing coitus in bulls during estrus. The results further suggest that in addition to vaginal mucus, other body fluids like saliva, faeces and milk have estrus-related odours and are probably involved in bovine bio-communication.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Use of short-term progestin treatment to resynchronize the second estrus following synchronized breeding in beef heifers.

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of short-term progestin administration to resynchronize the second estrus after artificial insemination in yearling beef heifers. In Trial 1 crossbred yearling heifers (n = 208) were synchronized with Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) and artificially inseminated (AI) between 48 and 54 h following implant removal. Implant removal is defined as Day 1. Following AI, the heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups. Group 1 heifers were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA) daily from Day 17 to 21 at a rate of 0.5 mg/head, while Group 2 control received no exogenous progestin during this period. Synchrony of estrus was defined as the 3-d period in which the highest number of heifers expressed behavioral estrus in each group. There was no difference (P < 0.05) in the pregnancy rate during the second estrus due to MGA supplementation. More MGA-treated heifers (P < 0.01) expressed estrus in a 3-d period than the controls. In Trial 2, yearling heifers (n = 108) were synchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) (second PGF(2alpha) injection is designated as Day 1) administered 14 d apart with AI 12 h after the onset of behavioral estrus. The heifers were then randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 treatment groups after initial AI: 1) MGA fed at 0.5 mg/head daily from Days 17 to 21; 2) norgestomet administered in 6.0-mg implants from Days 17 to 21; 3) untreated control heifers. Blood samples were collected on Day 21 and analyzed for progesterone (P(4)). Elevated P(4) (> 1 ng/ml) on Day 21 indicated pregnancy to the first insemination. Synchrony among the 3 groups of heifers was similar (P > 0.10); however, the second estrus was less (P < 0.05) variable in the MGA and norgestomet treated heifers. During the resynchronized second estrus, conception rates were not affected by progestin treatment (MGA 40%, norgestomet 64%, and control 62%; P > 0.10). However, a proportion of heifers treated MGA 10% 4 36 and norgestomet 3% 1 36 expressed behavioral estrus during second estrus even though they were diagnosed as pregnant from first service by elevated P(4) levels on Day 21. We conclude that short-term use of progestin from Days 17 to 21 following AI causes closer synchrony of estrus; however, inseminating pregnant heifers that exhibit behavioral estrus may cause abortion.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

Factors affecting temporal relationships between estrus and ovulation in commercial sow farms.

The main objective was to examine effects of season, parity, genotype, lactation length, and weaning-to-estrus interval on duration of estrus (DE) and onset of estrus-to-ovulation interval (EOI) in three sow farms. Detection of estrus and ovulation by the back-pressure test and transabdominal ultrasonography, respectively, were performed every 6 h from day 2-10 postweaning in 535 sows (approximately 89 per farm per season). The average weaning-to-estrus interval, DE, and EOI of the 501 sows that returned to estrus by day 10 postweaning were 4.6+/-0.1 days, 55.2+/-0.5 h, and 41.8+/-0.5 h, respectively. Farm x season (P<0.01), parity x season (P <0.05), and farm x weaning-to-estrus interval (P<0.05) interactions for DE and EOI were detected. Sows weaned in the summer had an 8 h longer (P<0.001) DE and EOI than those weaned in the spring on farms 1 and 3. On farm 2 however, DE and EOI did not differ (P=0.09) in sows weaned in summer versus spring. On each farm, parity 3 and > or =4 sows had a 4.5 h longer (P<0.05) DE and EOI than parity 1 and 2 sows in the summer, but there were no differences (P>0.11) in DE or EOI among parity classes in the spring. There was a linear decrease of DE (P<0.001) and EOI (P<0.05) as weaning-to-estrus interval increased from the 3 to the > or =7 day class on each farm. However, the range of weaning-to-estrus interval that exhibited a stepwise decrease of DE and EOI was narrower on farm 1 (3-5 days) than farms 2 and 3 (3-6 days). Only farms 1 and 3 had multiple genotypes. Genotype did not affect (P>0.14) DE on either farm, but the EOI of genotype B was 4 h shorter (P<0.05) than genotype C on farm 1. On each farm, DE decreased linearly (P<0.01) as lactation length increased from < or =13 to > or =20 days. In general, factors that affected EOI also affected (P<0.05) the percentage of inseminations that occurred within 24 h pre- to 3h post-ovulation. These data indicate that factors other than weaning-to-estrus interval, such as season and parity, can significantly alter DE and EOI. However, the effects of season and weaning-to-estrus interval on DE and EOI can be inconsistent among different farms.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed2004

Estrus synchronization in beef heifers with progestin-based protocols. I. Differences in response based on pubertal status at the initiation of treatment.

Two progestin-based protocols for estrus synchronization in replacement beef heifers were compared on the basis of estrous response, interval to and synchrony of estrus, and pregnancy rate. The objective was to determine, whether addition of GnRH to a melengestrol acetate (MGA)-prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) estrus synchronization protocol would improve synchrony of estrus without compromising fertility in yearling beef heifers. Heifers at two locations (Location 1, n = 60 and Location 2, n = 64) were assigned randomly to one of two treatments by breed and pubertal status. Heifers were defined as, pubertal when concentrations of progesterone in serum were elevated (> or = 1 ng/mL) in either one of two samples obtained 10 and 1 day prior to treatment initiation. Prior to MGA administration, 18/60 (30%) and 36/64 (56%) of the heifers at Locations 1 and 2, respectively, were pubertal. Heifers in both treatments were fed MGA (0.5 mg/head/day in 1.8 kg/head/day supplement) for 14 days followed by 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. (MGA-PGF2alpha) 19 days after MGA withdrawal (Day 33 of treatment). One-half of the heifers at each location received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. 12 days after MGA withdrawal (Day 26 of treatment; MGA Select). The control group received only MGA-PGF2alpha. Heifers were observed for signs of behavioral estrus continuously during daylight hours for 7 days beginning on the day PGF2alpha was administered. Heifers were inseminated 12 h after observed estrus. There was a treatment by location by pubertal status interaction (P < 0.05) for interval to estrus. Compared to the respective control treatment at each location, prepubertal heifers assigned to the MGA Select protocol at Location 1 had longer intervals to estrus, whereas at Location 2, prepubertal heifers assigned to the MGA-PGF2alpha protocol had longer intervals to estrus. The higher number of pubertal heifers at Location 2 was associated with a reduced variance in the interval to estrus among MGA Select treated heifers. Total estrous response and synchronized conception rates were similar between treatments at both locations. These data suggest that addition of GnRH to the MGA-PGF2alpha protocol may improve synchrony of estrus, however, the degree of synchrony may be influenced by pubertal status of heifers at the time treatments are imposed. Further studies are needed to define production systems in which the MGA Select protocol is warranted for use in beef heifers.

Animals↗