Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDARTERECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Is routine carotid ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: Periodic ultrasound studies are routinely performed after carotid endarterectomy with the aim of detecting recurrent stenosis or progression of contralateral disease. The frequency with which these studies should be performed and their clinical utility is at present unclear. Our experience with ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy was reviewed. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our carotid registry as a follow-up on patients who had undergone primary endarterectomy between 1982 and 1995. The database was searched for events referable to the contralateral carotid artery including incidence of contralateral endarterectomy, progression of contralateral stenosis, and development of new neurologic symptoms. Data was analyzed by life-table methodology. RESULTS: A total of 562 patients underwent 660 endarterectomies during the study interval with a postoperative stroke rate of 3.6% and a mortality of 1.1%. Of these, 496 patients had data available on the contralateral artery. There were 384 patent, nonoperated contralateral arteries available for long-term clinical follow-up, of which 276 had serial Doppler examinations. At the time of initial presentation, 30% of patients (141 cases) had greater than 50% diameter stenosis in the contralateral artery including 45 occlusions. There were 67 contralateral endarterectomies performed within 6 months of the original surgery. An additional 15 endarterectomies were performed within 24 months of the original surgery and only 16 subsequent endarterectomies were performed up to the 8-year follow-up. Progression of contralateral stenosis from less than to greater than 50% occurred in 10.1% of the patient population. The rate of disease progression was 5.1% at 3 years, 17.8% at 5 years, and 30% at 7 years. Stroke-free survival in patients without progression was 94.7% at 3 years and 93.3% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Significant contralateral disease occurs in about one third of patients, most of whom are candidates for early contralateral endarterectomy. In patients who present with minimal contralateral disease, the incidence of progression is low over time. Follow-up duplex examinations on a biennial schedule is sufficient to detect clinically significant disease progression in these patients.

Carotid Stenosis↗
PubMed1996

Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery: technique and results in 449 procedures.

BACKGROUND: Preservation of neurological function with a low incidence of restenosis is a measure of the long-term durability of carotid endarterectomy. Routine and selective patch angioplasty of the internal carotid artery have both been used to reduce the incidence of restenosis. The European literature has had many reports of lower restenosis rates in patients undergoing eversion carotid endarterectomy. We evaluated our experience with the eversion carotid endarterectomy procedure over a 2-year period to identify any advantage of this technique. METHODS: Between August 1993 and August 1995, 376 patients underwent 449 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) using the eversion technique (described below). During the same period, 307 patients underwent 353 CEAs by standard endarterectomy. Demographics were similar in both groups. Fifty-two patients in the eversion group underwent combined open cardiac procedures and carotid endarterectomy. There were 47 such patients in the standard group. Duplex examination was performed after surgery at regular intervals to identify any recurrent stenosis. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 4 of 376 (1.1%) and 6 of 307 (2%) in the eversion and standard groups, respectively. Shunts were used in 15 of 449 patients in the eversion group and 24 of 353 patients in the standard group. Cervical block anesthesia was used in 669 of 687 (97%) of patients undergoing CEA without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There were four permanent neurologic deficits in the eversion group and seven in the standard group, for respective stroke rates of 0.9% and 2%, and there were three transient neurologic deficits in the eversion group and nine in the standard group. There was one (0.2%) restenosis in the eversion group; there were four (1.1%) in the standard group by follow-up duplex scan. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that eversion carotid endarterectomy can be performed with low stroke and mortality rates in the treatment of extracranial carotid occlusive disease. The incidence of restenosis was lower and approached significance in eversion endarterectomy when compared to standard carotid endarterectomy in the short-term follow-up in this series.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Reoperation for carotid stenosis is as safe as primary carotid endarterectomy.

PURPOSE: Patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis are sometimes referred for carotid angioplasty and stenting because of reports that carotid reoperation has a higher complication rate than primary carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a difference exists between outcomes of primary carotid endarterectomy and reoperative carotid surgery. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for all carotid operations performed from September 1993 through March 1998 by vascular surgery faculty at a single academic center. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis were compared. RESULTS: A total of 390 operations were performed on 352 patients. Indications for primary carotid endarterectomy (n = 350) were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 42% of the cases, amaurosis fugax and transient ischemic symptoms in 35%, global symptoms in 14%, and previous stroke in 9%. Indications for reoperative carotid surgery (n = 40) were symptomatic recurrent lesions in 50% of the cases and progressive high-grade asymptomatic stenoses in 50%. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy were no postoperative deaths, an overall stroke rate of 1.1% (three postoperative strokes, one preoperative stroke after angiography), and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. The results of operations for recurrent carotid stenosis were no postoperative deaths, no postoperative strokes, and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. In the primary carotid endarterectomy group, the mean hospital length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1. 1 days and the mean hospital cost was $9700. In the reoperative group, the mean length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1.5 days and the mean cost was $13,700. The higher cost of redo surgery is accounted for by a higher preoperative cerebral angiography rate (90%) in redo cases as compared with primary endarterectomy (40%). CONCLUSION: In this series of 390 carotid operations, the procedure-related stroke/death rate was 0.8%. There were no differences between the stroke-death rates after primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis. Operation for recurrent carotid stenosis is as safe and effective as primary carotid endarterectomy and should continue to be standard treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid stenting is less invasive than endarterectomy, but it is unclear whether it is as safe in patients with symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial to compare stenting with endarterectomy in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis of at least 60%. The primary end point was the incidence of any stroke or death within 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely after the inclusion of 527 patients for reasons of both safety and futility. The 30-day incidence of any stroke or death was 3.9% after endarterectomy (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 7.2) and 9.6% after stenting (95% CI, 6.4 to 14.0); the relative risk of any stroke or death after stenting as compared with endarterectomy was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1). The 30-day incidence of disabling stroke or death was 1.5% after endarterectomy (95% CI, 0.5 to 4.2) and 3.4% after stenting (95% CI, 1.7 to 6.7); the relative risk was 2.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 7.2). At 6 months, the incidence of any stroke or death was 6.1% after endarterectomy and 11.7% after stenting (P=0.02). There were more major local complications after stenting and more systemic complications (mainly pulmonary) after endarterectomy, but the differences were not significant. Cranial-nerve injury was more common after endarterectomy than after stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis of 60% or more, the rates of death and stroke at 1 and 6 months were lower with endarterectomy than with stenting. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00190398 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improved results of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic coronary disease: an analysis of 1,546 consecutive carotid operations.

The significant risk of fatal myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy in patients with coronary disease long has been recognized. In 1,546 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in 1,238 patients over the last 10 years, angina pectoris was present in 17% (212/1,238) of patients; a further 32% (396/1,238) of patients were asymptomatic, but had a history of myocardial infarction. The perioperative mortality (30 day) in the 1,306 consecutive endarterectomies in 1,026 patients without symptomatic coronary artery disease was 1.5% (15/1,026 patients). Of the 212 patients with symptoms, 85 carotid endarterectomies were performed in 77 patients without prior coronary bypass operation with an operative mortality of 18.2% (14/77 patients). The remaining 135 patients had 155 carotid endarterectomies but were treated by either prior coronary artery bypass (84 patients) or simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass (51 patients) with an operative mortality of 3% (4/135 patients). The greatly improved survival in those patients with symptomatic coronary disease who had a coronary artery bypass prior to or at the same time as carotid endarterectomy, and the absence of permanent neurological deficit in the 51 of these 135 patients who had simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass suggests that significantly improved survival can be achieved after carotid endarterectomy in these high risk patients by the use of simultaneous coronary artery bypass surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

An audit tool for assessing the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: To update appropriateness ratings for carotid endarterectomy using the best clinical evidence and to develop a tool to audit the procedure's use. METHODS: A nine-member expert panel drawn from all the Canadian Specialist societies that are involved in the care of patients with carotid artery disease, used the RAND Appropriateness Methodology to rate scenarios where carotid endarterectomy may be performed. A 9-point rating scale was used that permits the categorization of the use of carotid endarterectomy as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. A descriptive analysis was undertaken of the final results of the panel meeting. A database and code were then developed to rate all carotid endarterectomies performed in a Western Canadian Health region from 1997 to 2001. RESULTS: All scenarios for severe symptomatic stenosis (70-99%) were determined to be appropriate. The ratings for moderate symptomatic stenosis (50-69%) ranged from appropriate to inappropriate. It was never considered appropriate to perform endarterectomy for mild stenosis (0-49%) or for chronic occlusions. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid disease was thought to be of uncertain benefit at best. The majority of indications for the combination of endarterectomy either prior to, or at time of coronary artery bypass grafting were inappropriate. The audit tool classified 98.0% of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: These expert panel ratings, based on the best evidence currently available, provide a comprehensive and updated guide to appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy. The resulting audit tool can be downloaded by readers from the Internet and immediately used for hospital audits of carotid endarterectomy appropriateness.

Algorithms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Management of the external carotid artery during routine carotid endarterectomy.

This study analyzes the results of carotid endarterectomy with a uniform technique of external carotid artery management. Aggressive blind instrument and eversion endarterectomy of the distal external carotid and its branches above the superior thyroid artery was performed during 211 standard carotid endarterectomies. This technique allows isolated external carotid artery repair if necessary after re-establishing carotid blood flow. Of these, 196 (92.9%) had normal intraoperative continuous wave Doppler ultrasonography in the external carotid. The 15 (7.1%) abnormal external carotid arteries underwent isolated completion endarterectomy with or without patch reconstruction followed by a normal Doppler study. All 15 had normal external carotid artery duplex ultrasonography 3 to 6 months after endarterectomy. However, 2 of the 196 (1.04%) intraoperative ultrasound normal external carotids had significant residual or recurrent stenosis (no occlusions) 3 to 6 months after endarterectomy for an early external carotid residual or restenosis rate of 0.95% (2/211). This was significantly less (p less than 0.05) than the 5.2% (11/211) 3- to 6-month incidence of residual or recurrent external carotid stenosis (6) and occlusion (5) in 211 carotid endarterectomies in which the external carotid artery was managed in an arbitrary manner. This study supports aggressive eversion endarterectomy of the external carotid artery during standard carotid endarterectomy with isolated repair when indicated.

Carotid Artery, External↗
PubMed1989

[Coronary endarterectomy].

From July, 1984, to December, 1986, coronary bypass grafting was performed in 314 patients, 70 (22%) requiring coronary endarterectomy (RCA; 48 pts, LAD; 10 pts, LAD + RCA; 10 pts, Others; 2 pts). Coronary endarterectomy patients (END group) were younger and often with the risk factor of hyperlipidemia than non-endarterectomy patients (NON group). The over-all hospital mortality rate of END group was 7 per cent; perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 7 per cent of patients. Early postoperative angiogram (4 weeks after the operation) was performed in 54 patients. The patency rate of RCA endarterectomy was 81.8 per cent, and that of LCA endarterectomy was 75 per cent. This result was poor compared with the patency rate of non-endarterectomy graft (86.6%). However without endarterectomy, with all likelihood the patency rate of those grafts would have been poorer. The results of right coronary endarterectomy are satisfactory and better than those of the left coronary artery system. This experience suggests that coronary endarterectomy is safe and an useful adjunct of saphenous vein bypass grafting procedures in the management of diffuse coronary disease, especially in RCA lesions.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty following endarterectomy.

Prior to the introduction of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), bypass grafting or endarterectomy was the treatment of choice for aortoiliofemoral atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Currently, PTA is a well-established procedure for the treatment of aortoiliofemoral atherosclerotic occlusive disease. PTA is as effective as, and safer than, surgery in these cases. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and endarterectomy cause similar trauma to the arterial wall, i.e., intimal denudation, plaque disruption and splitting, and medial disruption, splitting, and overstretching. Both PTA and endarterectomy heal in a similar manner, i.e., neointima formation and scarring. Both PTA and endarterectomy can be repeated. Therefore, PTA can be performed after endarterectomy or vice versa. Several patients with recurrent occlusive disease after endarterectomy have been safely treated with PTA. Our results obtained with PTA in patients who had a prior endarterectomy are comparable to the results obtained in patients who did not have a prior endarterectomy. No complications have been encountered. A previous endarterectomy does not preclude a subsequent PTA, or vice versa, in patients with recurrent occlusive disease.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗
PubMed1988

Operative and long-term results of staged contralateral carotid endarterectomy: a personal series.

The operative risks as well as the proper interval for patients undergoing staged contralateral carotid endarterectomies remain uncertain. The long-term incidence of stroke after bilateral carotid endarterectomy is also poorly documented. In this report the results of staged contralateral carotid endarterectomies performed by one surgeon in a consecutive series of 89 patients are analyzed. No deaths occurred after a first or contralateral carotid endarterectomy. Four (4%) neurologic deficits (three minor and one major) occurred after a first operation, whereas only one (1%) major neurologic deficit occurred after a contralateral carotid endarterectomy. Postendarterectomy hypertension was noted in 33 (37%) patients after a first operation, and in 62 (70%) patients after a contralateral carotid endarterectomy (p less than 0.00001). No correlation existed among the intervals between carotid operations and the incidence or duration of hypertension after a contralateral carotid endarterectomy. From our results we conclude that the staged contralateral carotid endarterectomy can be safely performed with a stroke-mortality rate approaching 1%. Postendarterectomy hypertension, although more frequent after the contralateral operation as compared with the first operation, has no correlation with the interval between procedures. After a staged bilateral carotid endarterectomy, only one (1%) patient experienced transient ischemic attack symptoms, but five (6%) patients suffered late stroke (four fatal).

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is more effective than medical management in the prevention of stroke in patients with severe symptomatic or asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis. Stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is a less invasive revascularization strategy than endarterectomy in carotid-artery disease. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial comparing carotid-artery stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device to endarterectomy in 334 patients with coexisting conditions that potentially increased the risk posed by endarterectomy and who had either a symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis of at least 50 percent of the luminal diameter or an asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80 percent. The primary end point of the study was the cumulative incidence of a major cardiovascular event at 1 year--a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days after the intervention or death or ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that the less invasive strategy, stenting, was not inferior to endarterectomy. RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 20 patients randomly assigned to undergo carotid-artery stenting with an emboli-protection device (cumulative incidence, 12.2 percent) and in 32 patients randomly assigned to undergo endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 20.1 percent; absolute difference, -7.9 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -16.4 to 0.7 percentage points; P=0.004 for noninferiority, and P=0.053 for superiority). At one year, carotid revascularization was repeated in fewer patients who had received stents than in those who had undergone endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 0.6 percent vs. 4.3 percent; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe carotid-artery stenosis and coexisting conditions, carotid stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is not inferior to carotid endarterectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Feasibility and safety of 1-day postoperative hospitalization for carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 1-day postoperative hospitalization after carotid endarterectomy is safe and the degree to which this can be achieved. DESIGN: Consecutive sample series of all carotid endarterectomies performed by a single surgical group. SETTING: A single tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: All who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Patients with procedures combined with coronary revascularization and patients undergoing the first part of a staged bilateral carotid endarterectomy performed in 1 hospitalization were excluded. INTERVENTION: In December 1993, a fast-track protocol was initiated, aiming for a 1-day stay after carotid endarterectomy without admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Before this date, postoperative care included obligatory monitoring for at least 1 night in an ICU. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, admission to and stay in the ICU, complications, and hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: Over a 21-month period, 152 patients had 163 carotid endarterectomies. Of these, 124 were elective and 39 urgent (patients with a critical stenosis). Indications were stroke (n = 14 [8.6%]), transient ischemic attack (n = 50 [30.7%]), amaurosis fugax (n = 36 [22.1%]), and asymptomatic stenosis (n = 63 [38.7%]). General anesthesia was used for 159 procedures, cervical block for 4. Mean operation time was 2.6 hours. Postoperative stay was 1 day for 82 procedures (50%), 2 days for 49 procedures (30%), 3 days for 12 procedures (7%), and longer for 20 procedures (12%). In the last half of the study, 61% of patients (50/82) were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 87% (71/82) by postoperative day 2. One hundred three patients went to a surgical floor postoperatively. Overall, 60 patients went to the ICU, but only 18 (22%) of the last 82 procedures required ICU admission. The total stay averaged 3.8 days. Twenty-one patients (13%) experienced complications, including 3 deaths within 30 days and 5 neurological deficits. There were 14 early readmissions, but none was attributable to discharge on the first or second postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge home after carotid endarterectomy is safe and efficacious, and obligatory admission to an ICU is not necessary. At least 60% of patients who undergo carotid endarterectomy can have a postoperative stay of 1 day, and more than 80% can be discharged by postoperative day 2. A short postoperative stay is not associated with a significant risk of readmission for complications.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Neointimal hyperplasia following argon ion laser carotid endarterectomy: with and without endothelial cell seeding.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compares the development of neointimal hyperplasia following conventional and argon ion laser carotid endarterectomy and assesses the potential advantage of endothelial cell seeding. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight dogs underwent conventional endarterectomy in one carotid artery and an argon ion laser endarterectomy in the other. After 42 days, these arteries were harvested and the intimal thickness were compared. Six additional dogs underwent bilateral argon ion laser carotid endarterectomy with endothelial cell seeding on the one side only. These arteries were harvested after 65 days and their mean intimal thickness were compared. RESULTS: At 42 days, the mean intimal thickness in the conventional endarterectomy group was 0.070 +/- 0.007 mm; in the argon ion laser endarterectomy group it was 0.058 +/- 0.001 mm (P = 0.76, NS). At 65 days, the mean intimal thickness in the group without endothelial cell seeding was 0.125 +/- 0.003 mm vs. 0.061 +/- 0.001 mm on the seeded side (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Argon ion laser carotid endarterectomy results in no more neointimal hyperplasia than conventional endarterectomy. The neointimal hyperplasia is reduced by endothelial cell seeding.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Effect of carotid endarterectomy on the ophthalmic artery.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of carotid endarterectomy on ophthalmic artery flow direction and peak systolic flow velocity, the authors examined the ophthalmic artery on 32 patients who had undergone carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: The 32 patients had more than 70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery at its origin on angiography. The ophthalmic artery ipsilateral to the carotid endarterectomy was evaluated by the ophthalmic artery color Doppler flow imaging before surgery and then at one week, one month, and three months after surgery. FINDINGS: (1) Before carotid endarterectomy: eight patients showed reversed ophthalmic artery direction. In the other 24 patients with antegrade ophthalmic artery flow direction, the average peak systolic flow velocity was 0.17+/-0.10 m/sec. (2) At one week after carotid endarterectomy: The reversed ophthalmic artery flow direction was resolved in each patient. The average peak systolic flow velocity in the patients with preoperative antegrade flow rose significantly to 0.28+/-0.10 m/sec (p<0.05). (3) At one month and three months after carotid endarterectomy: All patients showed the antegrade ophthalmic artery flow direction. The average peak systolic flow velocities showed no significant change compared to the value at one week after carotid endarterectomy. (4) During the followed up period, there was no patient showing worsening or recurrence of clinical symptoms including the visual symptoms. INTERPRETATION: Carotid endarterectomy brought about the correction of the reversed flow and an increase in the peak systolic flow velocity of the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery immediately after surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Patient selection for carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review.

Carotid artery stenting has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of severe extracranial carotid stenosis in patients with anatomic or clinical factors that increase their risk of complications with surgery, yet there remains a substantial amount of variability and uncertainty in clinical practice in the referral of patients for stenting vs endarterectomy. By undertaking a thorough review of the literature, we sought to better define which subsets of patients with "high-risk" features would be likely to preferentially benefit from carotid stenting or carotid endarterectomy. Although only a single randomized trial comparing the outcomes of carotid stenting with distal protection and endarterectomy has been completed, a wealth of observational data was reviewed. Relative to endarterectomy, the results of carotid stenting seem favorable in the setting of several anatomic conditions that render surgery technically difficult, such as restenosis after prior endarterectomy, prior radical neck surgery, and previous radiation therapy involving the neck. The results of stenting are also favorable among patients with severe concomitant cardiac disease. Carotid endarterectomy, alternatively, seems to represent the procedure of choice among patients 80 years of age or older in the absence of other high-risk features. Overall, existing data support the concept that carotid stenting and endarterectomy represent complementary rather than competing modes of therapy. Pending the availability of randomized trial data to help guide procedural selection, which is likely many years away, an objective understanding of existing data is valuable to help select the optimal mode of revascularization therapy for patients with severe carotid artery disease who are at heightened surgical risk.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗
PubMed1999

Outcome of coronary endarterectomy: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Despite early reports showing a high incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality, coronary endarterectomy continues to be used as an adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting, particularly in diffusely diseased coronary arteries. The changing nature of patients and improvements in modern cardiac surgery call for a reevaluation of the role of coronary endarterectomy. METHODS: Data from the 56 patients, who underwent coronary endarterectomy in our institution between January 1993 and August 1996, were reviewed retrospectively and compared with a control group of 56 patients matched for age, sex, LV function, and angina class. In the endarterectomy group, there were 47 men and nine women, with a mean age of 59.6 years. The mean follow-up time was 21 months. Indications for operation were angina in 45 (80.3%), angina with signs or symptoms of cardiac failure in 3 (5.4%), and prognosis in 8 (14.3%) asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: Fifty (89%) patients had one, four (7.2%) had two, and 2 (3.6%) patients had three coronary arteries endarterectomized. Of these 64 endarterectomies, 33 (51.5%) involved the right coronary artery, 20 (31.3%) the left anterior descending artery, and 11 (17.2%) branches of the circumflex artery. There were three (5.4%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions in the endarterectomy group, but none in the control group (p>0.05). Two patients (3.6%) in the endarterectomy group, but none in the control group, died within the first 30 days (p>0.05). Actuarial survival and incidence of recurrent angina were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In current cardiac surgical practice, coronary endarterectomy displays satisfactory rates of postoperative morbidity and medium term results in selected groups of patients.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1999

Reappraisal of coronary endarterectomy for the treatment of diffuse coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The development of new technologies such as transmyocardial laser revascularization and, more recently, local delivery of angiogenic growth factors has refocused attention on the surgical management of diffuse coronary artery disease. In some cases, coronary endarterectomy is also technically feasible. To facilitate decision-making among these options, we reviewed our experience with coronary endarterectomy to determine the results to be expected with this more traditional approach. METHODS: A search of our computerized database identified 7,096 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization between January 1, 1986 and March 30, 1997, of whom 177 (2.3%) underwent endarterectomy of at least one coronary artery. Perioperative events were derived from the database. Follow-up information was obtained from patients at 3 months to 11.5 years (mean = 55.7 +/- 38.8 months) after surgery. RESULTS: Endarterectomy was performed on the right coronary artery (RCA) system in 100 patients, the left anterior descending (LAD) system in 52, the circumflex system in 18, and in multiple distributions in 7. The 30-day mortality was 7% for RCA, 0% for LAD, 17% for circumflex, and 14% for multi-system endarterectomy (p = 0.20). There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative myocardial infarction or ventricular dysrhythmia between these groups. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 76% for patients undergoing RCA endarterectomy and 75% for left sided (LAD or circumflex) endarterectomy (p = 0.91). At late follow-up, 74% (86/117) of survivors were angina-free, 6% (7/117) had undergone subsequent angioplasty, and 3% (4/117) had undergone subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary endarterectomy can be accomplished with acceptable operative risk and good long-term results, even when applied in a highly selective manner. The results of novel therapies for diffuse coronary artery disease should be considered in the context of those achievable with more traditional approaches.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Intensive care is cost-effective in carotid endarterectomy.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the utilization, cost profile, and predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) services after carotid endarterectomy. A retrospective medical record review of all patients undergoing isolated carotid endarterectomy by a vascular surgery service at one university hospital during a 12-month period was performed. Eighty-four patients undergoing 91 carotid endarterectomies were identified for review. All carotid endarterectomy patients at the authors' institution were routinely admitted to an ICU postoperatively. Sixty-five of the 91 patients (71.4%) required ICU interventions, the majority of which were intravenous antihypertensive therapy. There were no deaths in the group. There was one non-fatal stroke (1.1%), and one non-fatal myocardial infarction (1.1%). There were three reoperations (3.3%): two for hematoma and one for a change in neurological status. One patient required reintubation. Five of the six major adverse events after carotid endarterectomy occurred within 12 hours postoperatively. No preoperative factors predicted a significant risk for complications following carotid endarterectomy. There is no reliable predictor that carotid endarterectomy patients will require postoperative interventions or develop adverse outcomes. Mandatory intensive care immediately after carotid endarterectomy upholds high safety standards, avoids the uncertainty of preoperative ICU planning, and avoids the high cost of a recovery room stay to determine the need for intensive care. In addition, costs may be further reduced as the ICU length of stay may be decreased if there are no necessary interventions or complications after 12 hours of intensive care.

Aged↗