Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DISABILITY EVALUATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

American Academy of Disability Evaluating Physicians (AADEP) position paper: complex regional pain syndrome I (RSD): impairment and disability issues.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview and methodology for the evaluation of impairment and functional residual capacity in complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I, RSD). This paper is intended to provide assistance to physicians asked to evaluate impairment- and disability-related issues and is not primarily geared to guide treatment of the CRPS I patient. METHOD: Conference and literature review by neurology, anesthesiology, pain medicine, physiatry, and disability evaluating physicians followed by description of issues, options, and recommendations based upon the committee's deliberations and the widely used AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, fourth and fifth editions. The authors present functional criteria for assessing the severity of CRPS. These criteria were developed by committee consensus opinion based on multidisciplinary clinical experience considering daily functional issues. They can be used in conjunction with CRPS-ADL Classes of Impairment in order to categorize an individual into a specific class for purposes of permanent impairment rating. Future reliability and validity studies of this rating scale are pending future use, acceptance and, hopefully, additional studies. RESULTS: Evaluators should perform a comprehensive assessment of patients with CRPS I to make an accurate diagnosis and exclude other conditions that could explain the symptoms and signs of the condition. While radiological, laboratory, and other diagnostic studies may be of assistance in making the diagnosis, in the final analysis, this is a clinical diagnosis. Impairment is based on objectively validated limitation in activities of daily living (ADL).

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Applications of functional assessment to musculoskeletal disability evaluation.

A review of the history of the disability determination for LBP suggests that the early focus upon disability as a direct "effect" of impairment has given way to an updated approach acknowledging the multitude of factors, many of which are subjective, that contribute to an individual's future return to work and disability status. In addition to the evaluation of the underlying impairment and pathology, physicians performing disability evaluations for LBP will be best served when they can assess the individual's functional status, and incorporate that information into their decision regarding the individual's current limitations and prognosis. As discussed above, many of the factors contributing to the evaluation of functional status, including pain, physical functioning, and affective status, are necessarily subjective. Nonetheless, the rehabilitation literature suggests that inclusion of this information into the disability determination using a patient-centered approach may provide the factors that are most potent with respect to patient prognosis and eventual return to work.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed1987

[Physical disabilities in Hansen's disease at the time of diagnosis. I. Disability evaluation].

The evaluation of the physical disabilities at the moment of the hanseniasis diagnosis was carried out through the clinical and epidemiological forms of the 8,915 cases recorded in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, from 1981 to 1983. The records of the physical disabilities were studied by three different methods: the disabilities at their highest grade, the disabilities' grade index achieved from the arithmetic mean of the added values of the different disability grades, and the absolute disabilities frequency. The study suggested that the maximum grade was the best evaluation method of the physical disabilities at the moment of the diagnosis, being an important indicator for the evaluation of prevention efforts and of the hanseniasis control.

Adolescent↗