Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cross Infection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: cross-infection and the need for segregation.

Evidence-based reasons for segregation of patients colonized with Pseudomonas aerugionsa in the outpatient setting are unclear. To clarify local decisions, Pseudomonas genotyping of the local environment, patients and patient contacts was undertaken in 1993. The hospital environment was re-swabbed in 1997. Pseudomonas genotyping of old and new patients attending the North Staffordshire cystic fibrosis clinic has subsequently been undertaken and more recently been repeated on an annual basis to assess whether the same Pseudomonas genotypes can be found in both the environment and in patients, and whether the same Pseudomonas genotype can be transferred from one patient to another. No Pseudomonas genotype found in the local environment in 1993 or in 1997 has been found in any of our patients. Nine children attending the same special school for many years and sharing the same physiotherapy facilities showed no evidence of cross-infectivity. Except for siblings living in the same household our cross-infectivity rate is very low and where cross-infection has potentially occurred the level of contact between these patients has been minimal. This study does not support the suggestion that patients with cystic fibrosis attending the North Staffordshire clinic and colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa should be segregated from non-colonized patients.

Adolescent↗

Cross-infection of chicks by airborne transmission of Salmonella enteritidis PT4.

Airborne cross-infection by Salmonella enteritidis PT4 strains was demonstrated between sets of orally infected 1-d-old chicks and identical uninfected control chicks. Low numbers of Salm. enteritidis were detected in the air of the rooms housing the chicks. Sentinel mice within the rooms did not become infected. This study demonstrates that low levels of airborne Salm. enteritidis are a potential source of cross-infection in poultry houses.

Air Microbiology↗

Cross infection on a combined paediatric plastic surgery and burns unit: a clinical and microbiological audit.

To try and determine any presence of cross-infection between patients, prospective screening of 226 consecutive admissions on our burns unit was performed by taking nose, throat and wound swabs. Infected wounds were also swabbed and a correlation was sought between the organisms cultured on screening swabs and those responsible for infection. We did not find any evidence of cross- infection occurring between the burns patients and the other categories of patients on the ward. Screening swabs were useful in detecting carriers, who were found to be more of a risk to themselves than to other patients on the unit.

Bacterial Infections↗

Cross-infection compliance of UK dental staff and students.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to determine the compliance of a group of dental health care workers and students in aspects of cross-infection control. DESIGN: The dentists and dental students working in a dental clinic were observed by a 'hidden' ceiling-mounted video camera. Procedures were recorded onto videotape and the actions of the observed clinicians and students assessed by two suitably qualified assessors. SETTING: An emergency Oral Medicine clinic in a dental hospital. SUBJECTS: Seventy nine dentists and 35 dental undergraduates. METHODS: The action of staff and students were recorded on videotape and assessed retrospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Degree of compliance with recognised infection control policies. RESULTS: Compliance with recommended guidelines for control of cross-infection was poor. In only 56% of health care worker-patient contacts were protective gloves changed between patients. Facemasks and protective eyewear were only worn in 38% and 29% of such contacts respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with cross-infection control measures are poor in dentistry--even when clinicians are provided with appropriate facilities.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Prospective study of cross-infection from upper-GI endoscopy in a hepatitis C-prevalent population.

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) in the Egyptian Nile Delta increases the demand for upper-GI endoscopy (UGIE) and the risk of cross-infection with this virus. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential for UGIE to transmit HCV when endoscopes are reprocessed according to current international standards. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study to detect the incidence of HCV and hepatitis B cross-infections. SETTING: The endoscopic unit of the National Liver Institute, a hospital for patients with chronic liver disease. PATIENTS: A total of 859, including 149 of 249 patients (60%) at risk (HCV-antibody negative) retested 3 to 10 months after UGIE with endoscopes previously used on HCV carriers. INTERVENTIONS: Nurses were trained to process endoscopes according to American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and procedures were observed and recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Seroconversions were determined by using enzyme immunoassays for anti-HCV; reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used to detect HCV-ribonucleic acid (RNA). RESULTS: Four patients, initially negative, tested positive for anti-HCV after UGIE. However, 2 of these had HCV-RNA in their baseline blood sample, and the other 2 did not have HCV-RNA in their follow-up sample. LIMITATIONS: Very-high prevalence of anti-HCV in subjects reduced the proportion at risk of infection, and follow-up was difficult. CONCLUSIONS: There were no cases of proven transmission of HCV when endoscopes were reprocessed by using currently accepted standards. This negative study is encouraging, because patients undergoing UGIE in the Nile Delta of Egypt where HCV-caused liver disease is so pervasive would be at maximum risk of HCV cross-infection from UGIE.

Adult↗

Prospective surveillance for Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infection at a cystic fibrosis center.

We have performed a 4-year prospective surveillance for Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infection at a large regional adult cystic fibrosis center. Despite purpose-built facilities in a new building and the practice of strict hygiene, P. aeruginosa cross-infection has continued. In contrast, individuals segregated from the cohort of patients with chronic P. aeruginosa infection but who attend the same center have not acquired infection with transmissible P. aeruginosa strains. Simple infection control measures alone do not prevent the spread of transmissible P. aeruginosa strains between individuals with cystic fibrosis. However, in our clinic patient segregation effectively controlled spread of such strains.

Adult↗

Cross infection in the high-touch areas of dental radiology clinics.

Disinfection and sterilization have received considerable attention due to the spread of AIDS and HIV. Several infections hazards to the patient and personnel of dental surgery have been identified from blood, saliva and water of dental unit. The high touch areas of dental x-ray equipment is a potential source of infection. The present study was undertaken to determine the extent of cross-infection present in the dental radiology clinics with and without the use of surface disinfectants. Swabs taken from high touch areas of the x-ray equipment in 15 different sessions with in one month were cultured in three different media. The study revealed, almost all high touch areas in dental radiology clinic had bacterial contamination in the absence of surface disinfection. "Webcol" and "Superficid" disinfectants showed minimum or no contamination. To remove risk of cross-infection, disinfection of high-touch areas of dental x-ray equipment is mandatory.

Cross Infection↗

[Is length of stay in the recovery room a risk factor for cross infections?].

OBJECTIVE: To assess cross contamination for patients at the time of their stay in the recovery room (RR). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective survey over 3 weeks with 75 adult patients admitted to RR after thoracic or neck surgery. Samples for bacterial analysis were systematically taken from all patients before they left the operating theatre and just before discharge of RR (nose-throat and skin adjacent to the surgical wound). During this period, hand's health care workers (HCW) and environmental surfaces were sampled. RESULTS: There were 3 groups of patients: endoscopy (41%), thoracic surgery (39%). And thyroidectomy (20%), 392 samples were analysed. Potentially pathogenic floras were found on the admission for 25 patients and at discharge for 31 patients. A pathogenic flora was detected at discharge in 13 patients, whereas none was found at admission in RR. These patients were principally in the thyroidectomy group and their stay in RR was longer than 20 minutes. There is no significant difference concerning the nosocomial risk between 3 groups. Pathogenic flora was found in 19% of HCW (8 of 42). CONCLUSION: Cross contamination can exist in recovery room and educative measures are to be taken regarding handwhashing, isolation precautions and environmental cleaning.

Adult↗

Evaluation of antimicrobial sensitivity patterns as markers of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infection at a cystic fibrosis clinic.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most important bacterial pathogens in cystic fibrosis-associated lung disease. The means by which the organism is acquired or nosocomially spread is uncertain, but person-to-person spread has been implicated. Therefore, typing of P. aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients is necessary to determine the source of infection. Although P. aeruginosa strains can be compared using a variety of nucleic acid typing methods, this is time-consuming, expensive and requires specialised equipment, and is better suited to large reference laboratories. In this study, the use of antimicrobial sensitivity patterns in the investigation of possible cross-infection at cystic fibrosis clinics was examined, and 496 P. aeruginosa isolates from 69 patients were analysed. Analysis of dates and times of hospital visits allowed the study to concentrate on specific contact episodes where cross-infection could have occurred. Genotypic analysis of a number of organisms allowed the value of the sensitivity patterns to be assessed. No evidence of cross-infection was found, but antimicrobial sensitivity patterns proved unreliable in detecting similarity among P. aeruginosa strains.

Bacterial Typing Techniques↗

Clostridium difficile-associated colitis: cross infection in predisposed patients with renal failure.

Four men with renal failure developed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea while being cared for in the same ward at about the same time. Cross infection appeared to play a role. All patients had received antibiotics; three were treated for chest infections and one for a urinary tract infection. The antibiotics implicated were cefoxitin alone in two patients, cefoperazone alone in one patient and cloxacillin, cefoperazone and amoxycillin in the last patient. Two patients had received immunosuppressive agents as well. Clostridium difficile cytotoxin was detected in stools from all patients using a cell culture assay. Pseudomembranous colitis was demonstrated in two patients at sigmoidoscopy and in one at post mortem. All patient were given oral vancomycin. Two died with the disease, one following relapse in the absence of antibiotics, and two patients were cured only to die later of unrelated diseases. Isolation of affected patients seems prudent as the disease may be infectious.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Clusters of nosocomial cross-infection due to Acinetobacter baumannii and genospecies 3: comparison of serotyping with macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Triplets of isolates representing 20 putative clusters of nosocomial cross-infection due to Acinetobacter baumannii and genospecies 3 were examined comparatively using serotyping and analysis of restriction fragments (SmaI and ApaI) of genomic DNA with the aid of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Carbon source assimilation tests disclosed phenotypic variation among 6 to 20 triplets of isolates. Two misleading results of serotyping were encountered. With respect to the presumptive cluster No. 9, one of the genospecies 3 (originally serovar 4) isolates proved to be polyagglutinable upon repeat examination; this particular putative cluster was shown to be a pseudocluster by comparison of the macrorestriction profiles of the respective triple isolates. A strain of A. baumannii serovar 15 had infected 8 patients in a surgical intensive care unit, while a second, genotypically totally different strain of identical serovar had caused infection in one additional patient. With this exception, the correlation between serotyping and analysis of macrorestriction profiles was excellent.

Acinetobacter↗

Cross-infection in the dental profession. Dental instruments sterilization: assessment. 1.

In dentistry, and as a part of the health profession, cross-infection is a professional hazard. The infection can be transmitted by instruments, dental personnel or by patients. Dental instrument sterilization is a vital procedure to reduce the chance of cross-infection in the dental profession. Part I of this study is to assess the dental instruments sterilization at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Random samples were taken from the CSSD for this purpose. No bacterial growth was detected.

Cross Infection↗

Attitudes to cross-infection measures of UK and Hong Kong patients.

The knowledge and attitudes of dental patients in the UK and Hong Kong towards aspects of cross-infection control have been surveyed. Almost all patients expected dentists to wear protective gloves but only 73% and 40% expected dental staff to wear protective face masks and spectacles respectively. Most patients were aware that such measures were for the benefit of both dental staff and patients. Just over 50% of patients believed that they could contact HIV from an HIV-infected dentist. UK and Cantonese patients had generally similar attitudes to cross-infection protection, but the latter were positively influenced by the routine use of masks and spectacles and were more concerned about HIV transmission than UK patients.

Attitude to Health↗

[Cross-infection during scalding and plucking of broiler chickens (author's transl)].

In two poultry-processing plants, experiments were carried out to detect cross-infection during scalding and plucking of broiler chickens. These trials showed that cross-infection was only detectable when experimental infection with the indicator micro-organism Escherichia coli K12 was applied externally to the broiler chickens. When infection was applied internally, only a small degree of transmission was observed. Indicator micro-organisms applied externally to broiler chickens prior to scalding and plucking, were present on the cooled product in larger numbers than those applied internally in the intestines of broilers. The number of carcasses which were positive after cooling was found to have decreased in poultry-processing plant B compared with the situation after plucking, whereas this number was not affected to any appreciable extent in processing plant A.

Animals↗

Investigation of cross-infection in isolation wards of different design.

A survey was conducted in seven hospitals to assess the risk of cross-infection with the highly infectious air-borne diseases, varicella-zoster and measles, in isolation wards of different design. Existing wards and isolation techniques were found to afford a high degree of protection, but there was considerable variation in the incidence of cross-infection related to ward structure, ward practice and the availability of trained staff. Recommendations are made for the design of new isolation wards and for safe practice.

Chickenpox↗

The prevention of cross-infection. Progress in the West Midlands.

A questionnaire was sent to a group of general dental practitioners in the West Midlands, one year after they had participated in a previous survey and a year following publication of the British Dental Association's 'Guide to blood-borne viruses and the control of cross-infection in dentistry'. Results show that awareness of the need to safeguard patients and staff from the risks of cross-infection continues to grow and that procedures undertaken to reduce the possibility of cross-infection continue to be improved.

Attitude to Health↗