Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Conscience”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Challenge of culture, conscience, and contract to general practitioners' care of their own health: qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore general practitioners' perceptions of the effects of their profession and training on their attitudes to illness in themselves and colleagues. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups and in depth interviews. SETTING: Primary care in Northern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: 27 general practitioners, including six recently appointed principals and six who also practised occupational medicine part time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants' views about their own and colleagues' health. RESULTS: Participants were concerned about the current level of illness within the profession. They described their need to portray a healthy image to both patients and colleagues. This hindered acknowledgement of personal illness and engaging in health screening. Embarrassment in adopting the role of a patient and concerns about confidentiality also influenced their reactions to personal illness. Doctors' attitudes can impede their access to appropriate health care for themselves, their families, and their colleagues. A sense of conscience towards patients and colleagues and the working arrangements of the practice were cited as reasons for working through illness and expecting colleagues to do likewise. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners perceive that their professional position and training adversely influence their attitudes to illness in themselves and their colleagues. Organisational changes within general practice, including revalidation, must take account of barriers experienced by general practitioners in accessing health care. Medical education and culture should strive to promote appropriate self care among doctors.

Attitude to Health↗

Professions as the conscience of society.

Ethics is no less of a science than any other. It has its roots in conflicts of interest between human beings, and in their conflicting urges to behave either selfishly or altruistically. Resolving such conflicts leads to the specification of rules of conduct, often expressed in terms of rights and duties. In the special case of professional ethics, the paramount rule of conduct is altruism in the service of a 'noble' cause, and this distinguishes true professions from other trades or occupations. If professional ethics come into conflict with national laws, the professional today can test the legitimacy of such laws by reference to internationally agreed legal standards in the field of human rights, and so help to perform the role of 'professions as the conscience of society'.

Codes of Ethics↗

"Who should survive?: one of the choices on our conscience": mental retardation and the history of contemporary bioethics.

The film "Who Should Survive?: One of the Choices on Our Conscience" contains a dramatization of the death of an infant with Down syndrome as the result of the parents' decision not to have a congenital intestinal obstruction surgically corrected. The dramatization was based on two similar cases at The Johns Hopkins Hospital and was financed by the Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr., Foundation. When "Who Should Survive?" was exhibited in 1971, the public reaction was generally critical of the parents' decision and the physicians' inaction. Although technological developments in medicine were a necessary condition for the production of this film and its unanticipated reception, they were not a sufficient condition. The proximate cause was a changed understanding of the capabilities of individuals with Down syndrome. Part of the impetus for this change was data showing the adverse effects of institutionalization on normal children.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship.

Medical paternalism lies at the heart of traditional medicine. In an effort to counteract the effects of this paternalism, medical ethicists and physicians have proposed a model of patient autonomy for the physician-patient relationship. However, neither paternalism or autonomy are adequate characterizations of the physician-patient relationship. Paternalism does not respect the rights of adults to self-determination, and autonomy does not respect the principle of beneficence that leads physicians to argue that acting on behalf of others is essential to their craft. A model of physician conscience is proposed that summarizes the best features of both models--paternalism and autonomy.

Beneficence↗

Ethical issues in gynecology: adolescent confidentiality, provider conscience and abortion, and patient choice of provider gender.

All medical specialists struggle with problems that cannot be solved with medical knowledge alone. The field of gynecology is not unique in medicine for the presence of ethical dilemmas, but the nature of the dilemmas are unique. Gynecologists commonly confront complex ethical questions in their practices that can be answered only through thoughtful consideration of the values, interests, rights, goals, and obligations of those involved. In this paper, three ethical issues that commonly arise in the practice of gynecology are presented: adolescent confidentiality regarding reproductive health services, physician conscience and provision of abortion services, and the question of accommodating patient choice of provider gender. Each topic is introduced with a case vignette followed by an analysis of the issues involved and recommendations for resolution.

Abortion, Induced↗

[Do Danish surgeons have problems of conscience and responsibility? Results of a preliminary questionnaire survey].

A survey among Danish surgeons was conducted in order to elucidate whether Danish surgeons have problems of conscience related to their operative activity, especially when the results of the latter are unsatisfactory or lead to the death of the patient. Forty-three surgeons returned a questionnaire. All surgeons agreed that the problem that was raised was a significant one. The majority of the surgeons were aware of a patient, whom they had operated on and where the result of surgery was unsatisfactory or even caused the death of the patient. These problems are only to a limited extent discussed at work, whereas they are more frequently dealt with at home.

Denmark↗