Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Communication Barriers”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Communication: principal barrier to nurse-consumer partnerships.

An 8-month pilot study conducted in urban, rural and remote areas of Australia sought to identify barriers to nurse-consumer partnerships, as well as strategies to overcome these barriers. One hundred and ninety-nine Registered Nurses (RNs) and 36 consumers participated across 14 workshops to collect data for the pilot study. Analysis of these data found that nurses' perceptions of partnership with consumers were diverse. Nevertheless, participants in the workshops identified 'communication' as the principal barrier to nurse-consumer partnerships. Contexts in which communication barriers occur grouped easily under the themes of information transfer, documentation, education, personal and interpersonal situations, guidelines and policy, organizational structures, politics, resources and time. Workshop participants also worked together to identify/recommend strategies through which the most important barriers to communication in nurse-consumer partnerships could be addressed.

Communication Barriers↗

Consultation planning to help breast cancer patients prepare for medical consultations: effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians.

PURPOSE: To measure the prevalence of communication barriers between breast cancer patients and their physicians and to present the results of a study evaluating the impact of two visit preparation techniques on communication and satisfaction for breast cancer patients and their physicians. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 132 breast cancer patients from two outpatient cancer centers in a sequential, controlled trial. Ninety-four consented and completed the trial. Patients were assigned to one of two visit preparation interventions before their appointment with either a surgeon or a medical oncologist. In the control intervention, called Productive Listening, a researcher listened to and prompted patients to reflect on their experiences communicating with physicians. In the experimental intervention, called Consultation Planning, a researcher elicited questions and concerns, generated a printed agenda for the upcoming consultation, and engaged patients in techniques to improve communication with their physicians. Valid and reliable surveys measured communication barriers, satisfaction with the intervention, and patients' and physicians' satisfaction with the consultation. RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of the patients reported three or more communication barriers. Patients reported a significant reduction in communication barriers after both the intervention and the control session. Patients reported significantly higher satisfaction after the Consultation Planning sessions. Physicians reported significantly higher satisfaction with those patients who had participated in a Consultation Planning session. CONCLUSION: Visit preparation sessions help patients prepare for medical consultations and reduce barriers to communication. Consultation Planning sessions, in which a researcher solicited the patient's agenda, were more satisfying to patients and physicians than the Productive Listening sessions.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care: perspectives of care providers.

OBJECTIVE: Communication regarding end-of-life care is frequently perceived as suboptimal, despite the intent of both health care providers and patients. We interviewed health care providers to determine their perspective regarding these barriers to communication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven focus groups with a total of 10 attending physicians, 24 residents, and 33 nurses were convened to explore barriers to end-of-life discussions on the Internal Medicine service at a 600-bed tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. An interview schedule was designed to elicit information regarding the process of end-of-life discussions, barriers to these discussions, and possible interventions for limiting such barriers. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed by 6 raters who independently identified "themes." Themes were refined using the Delphi technique and classified under broader "categories." RESULTS: Four main categories of barriers emerged, relating to (1) patients, (2) the health care system, (3) health care providers, and (4) the nature of this dialogue. Attending physicians and residents most frequently identified patient-related factors as barriers to discussions, followed by system, dialogue, and provider barriers (43%, 39%, 10%, and 8%, respectively, for attending physicians; 40%, 34%, 13%, and 13%, respectively, for residents). Nurses similarly identified patient-related and system barriers most frequently, but provider barriers were discussed more often than dialogue barriers (46%, 28%, 22%, and 4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Attending physicians, residents, and nurses perceive the recipients of their care, and the system within which they provide this care, to be the major source of barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care. This finding may impact on the effectiveness of quality-improvement initiatives in end-of-life care.

Adult↗

Cancer in remission. Challenge in collaboration for family physicians and oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: To explore oncologists' perspectives on the process of cancer patient follow up and to identify what oncologists need from family physicians during the remission stage of cancer disease. DESIGN: Qualitative study with in-depth interviews. SETTING: Regional cancer centre serving a catchment area of 1.4 million people. PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sample of 10 oncologists. One was unable to participate because of sabbatical leave. The nine who participated represented both radiation and medical oncology. Oncologists who had practised at the cancer centre for less than 2 years were excluded from the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Existing barriers to communication and collaboration between oncologists and family physicians in cancer patient follow up. RESULTS: Oncologists described roles for themselves in reassuring patients, detecting recurrence, monitoring toxicity of treatment, and gathering data for clinical trials. Collaboration with family physicians in the remission phase was identified as desirable but inhibited by variable and unpredictable interest, poor communication with family physicians, and patients' own preferences for follow up. Oncologists perceived the cancer system structure as a "black box" within which multidisciplinary teams worked well but seldom included family physicians. Oncologists expressed a need to see healthy patients and to have more understanding and support from family physicians, preferably through sharing follow-up care. Developing dialogue and a more collaborative approach were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians should maintain a role in remission follow-up. However, a more collaborative approach with oncologists is warranted. Communication barriers, patient preferences, and misperceptions between groups must be addressed before roles are redefined.

Aftercare↗

Barriers to communication between health practitioners and service users who are not fluent in English.

This paper reviews the main barriers to effective communication between practitioners and those service users of minority ethnic backgrounds who may not be fluent in English. Barriers are reviewed at an interpersonal level, concerning discrepancies of attitudes and beliefs, and communication skills. Consideration is given to the impact of organisational factors on practitioner-client communication, focusing on provision of bilingual health workers. A key argument is that practitioner education should enhance the ability of health professionals to reflect on both the individual and organisational aspects of transcultural communication competence.

Communication Barriers↗

Anorectic effects of circulating cytokines: role of the vascular blood-brain barrier.

Communication between the central nervous system and peripheral tissues is mediated in part by the ability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to transport peptides and regulatory proteins. Many cytokines with effects on appetite, including interleukins 1alpha, 1beta, and 6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, are transported across the BBB. Cytokines also can interact with the luminal surface of the brain endothelial cells, which constitute the BBB, to induce brain endothelial cells to release appetite-affecting substances into brain interstitial fluid. Leptin, a 16-kDa protein that binds to a cytokine receptor, is produced by fat cells and transported across the BBB by a saturable system to exert its anorectic effects. Transporter performance for appetite-related peptides and regulatory proteins can be altered by disease and under conditions associated with anorexia or obesity, a striking example being leptin transport in obesity. In mice with obesity of maturity, leptin transport is reduced by about two-thirds, showing that obesity involves a dysfunction of the BBB. That altered transport across the BBB of other substances related to feeding also might result in obesity or anorexia is a possibility that deserves investigation.

Anorexia↗

Race and sexual identity: perceptions about medical culture and healthcare among Black men who have sex with men.

Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the United States are disproportionately affected by HIV. Using a qualitative approach, the authors describe the healthcare experiences of BMSM in New York State and Atlanta, GA, exploring the social issues that influence barriers to care, communication, and adherence in medical settings. Racial and sexual discrimination socially displace BMSM, and are often compounded by negative encounters within medical institutions. The internalization of these experiences influences healthcare utilization, HIV testing, communication, and adherence behaviors among members of this population. Increasing the number of ethnic and sexual minority providers, expanding current definitions of cultural competency curricula at academic institutions, targeting future research efforts on BMSM, and improving the structural and communication barriers within healthcare settings should be incorporated into our HIV prevention and routine healthcare interventions for BMSM.

Adult↗

Blood-neural barrier: intercellular communication at glio-vascular interface.

The blood-neural barrier (BNB), including blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-retinal barrier (BRB), is an endothelial barrier constructed by an extensive network of endothelial cells, astrocytes and neurons to form functional "neurovascular units", which has an important role in maintaining a precisely regulated microenvironment for reliable neuronal activity. Although failure of the BNB may be a precipitating event or a consequence, the breakdown of BNB is closely related with the development and progression of CNS diseases. Therefore, BNB is most essential in the regulation of microenvironment of the CNS. The BNB is a selective diffusion barrier characterized by tight junctions between endothelial cells, lack of fenestrations, and specific BNB transporters. The BNB have been shown to be astrocyte dependent, for it is formed by the CNS capillary endothelial cells, surrounded by astrocytic end-foot processes. Given the anatomical associations with endothelial cells, it could be supposed that astrocytes play a role in the development, maintenance, and breakdown of the BNB. Therefore, astrocytes-endothelial cells interaction influences the BNB in both physiological and pathological conditions. If we better understand mutual interactions between astrocytes and endothelial cells, in the near future, we could provide a critical solution to the BNB problems and create new opportunities for future success of treating CNS diseases. Here, we focused astrocyte-endothelial cell interaction in the formation and function of the BNB.

Animals↗

Barriers to communication about end-of-life care in AIDS patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients and physicians do not adequately discuss patients' preferences for medical care at the end of life. Our objective was to perform a qualitative study using focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life medical care for patients with AIDS and their physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AIDS and physicians with moderate or extensive HIV experience were recruited from clinics and community-based settings using network sampling. A total of 47 patients participated in six focus groups and 19 physicians participated in three groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients or physicians identified 29 barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life care. Many patients and physicians expressed discomfort talking about death and dying, and some felt that discussing end-of-life care could cause harm or even hasten death. Several patients expressed the view that a living will obviated the need for discussion with their physician. Previous experience of discrimination from the health care system was a strong barrier to end-of-life communication for some patients with AIDS. Some patients hesitate to bring up end-of-life issues because they want to protect their physicians from uncomfortable discussions. Many patients identified the quality of communication as an important facilitator to these difficult discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the quality of patient-physician communication about end-of-life care will require that physicians identify and overcome the barriers to this communication. To improve the quality of medical care at the end of life, we must address the quality of communication about end-of-life care.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Registered nurses' perceptions of their communication with Spanish-speaking migrant farmworkers in North Carolina: an exploratory study.

Communication forms the foundation for all that nurses do. Recently, nurses working with migrant farmworkers have become challenged as the language of this population has become predominantly Spanish. To explore how nurses in North Carolina are managing communication issues, 55 nurses at 12 state health care agencies that serve migrant farmworkers was surveyed. Data were collected to determine what nurses believed about various communication issues involving these Spanish-speaking clients, including how they were presently communicating with them, in what areas of nursing functions they believed communication barriers were problematic, what they were doing to improve their communication, and what they envisioned the potential solutions were concerning communication barriers. Language differences proved to be substantial barriers to adequate nursing care for these individuals. Nurses cited many problems and said that they were receiving little assistance from their agencies to improve direct communication with the clients. Responses indicated a need for and a willingness by nurses to focus on improving communication with Spanish-speaking clients. Classes held at their agencies were seen as the most effective way of learning Spanish.

Adult↗

Communicating effectively with elderly surgical patients.

Effective communication promotes trusting, productive nurse/patient relationships. It is the perioperative nurse's responsibility to establish effective communication with each patient. Perioperative nurses strive to provide quality care to all patients, including the elderly. Communication barriers often do exist, however, between nurses and elderly patients. Perioperative nurses are challenged, therefore, to recognize potential communication barriers and to manage each nurse/patient relationship accordingly. Clear communication between nurse and patient enhances the elderly patient's ability to progress smoothly through surgery and recovery.

Aged↗

Language barrier leads to the unnecessary intubation of trauma patients.

Airway evaluation in trauma patients is performed immediately upon patient contact, with communication being a vital component to this exam. Language and communication barriers may lead to the unnecessary placement of an artificial airway with resultant patient risk and elevation of health care costs. The objective of our study was to evaluate potentially preventable intubations in Spanish-speaking patients. A 9-year retrospective review was performed using the National Trauma Registry for The American College of Surgeons (NTRACS) database. We evaluated patients intubated on arrival to the trauma center and remaining intubated for less than 48 hours. Deaths were excluded. Patients who typically speak English were compared with patients who typically speak Spanish. Mechanism of injury (MOI), hypotension during resuscitation (HDR), illicit substance use, alcohol use, mean Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), payer source, and hospital cost were compared. Forty-nine per cent and 38 per cent of Spanish and English speaking individuals, respectively, were intubated for less than 48 hours (P = 0.072). MOI, HDR, ISS, illicit substance use, alcohol use, and payer source were similar. GCS was statistically higher in the Spanish-speaking group (14 vs 12; P = 0.004). Language and communication barriers lead to potentially preventable intubations in trauma patients.

Adult↗

Improving patient-provider communication: insights from interpreters.

BACKGROUND: It is important for physicians to recognize and address potential cross-cultural communication barriers with their patients. Several studies have demonstrated the importance of trained medical interpreters for ensuring effective patient-provider communication. Medical interpreters also represent an untapped source of insight into common communication problems. Such insights can contribute to strengthening physicians' cross cultural communication skills. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore professional medical interpreters' experiences and perspectives regarding patient-provider communication difficulties. METHODS: Key informant interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of nine professional interpreters working at the Geneva University Hospitals general medicine outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Interpreters described three domains where physicians and patients were likely to differ, and where mutual lack of awareness of those differences could lead to misunderstandings. These were: (1) ideas about the patient's health problem; (2) expectations of the clinical encounter; and (3) verbal and non-verbal communication styles. Interpreters recommended that cultural competence training for physicians focus on raising awareness about potential sources of misunderstanding and about the difficulties inherent in medical translation; providing basic background knowledge of patients' countries of origin; and adapting to patients' communication styles. While physicians' own perceptions of communication difficulties are important for developing learner-centered training activities, interpreters' bilingual and bicultural position allows for the identification of communication barriers that may be difficult for physicians to recognize.

Attitude to Health↗