Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colonoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Peroral enteroscopic removal of a retained percutaneous transhepatic guidewire from the jejunum using a colonoscope.

Several authors have described the ability to perform small-intestine endoscopy with long, flexible fiberscopes. A peroral colonoscope has been used for small-bowel enteroscopy and biopsy. A pediatric colonoscope for jejunoscopy has been described. Herein we report a patient undergoing percutaneous transhepatic decompression for the extrahepatic biliary obstruction in whom the guidewire broke and was lost in the liver. The proximal end of the wire was within the liver, while the distal end exited the ampulla and lay within the upper jejunum. Utilizing a peroral approach with the flexible pediatric colonoscope, we recovered the guidewire without advancing it further into the jejunum, where it may have been lost and have necessitated a celiotomy.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The use of the 130-cm colonoscope for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

The 130-cm colonoscope was utilized to determine whether a deeper insertion could be accomplished after the usual enema preparation for routine flexible sigmoidoscopy and, if so, to what extent that would enhance the yield of neoplastic findings. Sixty-four patients were examined, and intubation was accomplished to the level of 69 cm compared with 48.1 cm for a matched control group that had flexible sigmoidoscopy with the 60-cm endoscope. Another 24 patients who had a barium enema prep had a significantly greater depth of insertion (81.4 cm). Only two polyps were found proximal to 60 cm. The 130-cm colonoscope does not offer any substantial advantage over the standard 60-cm sigmoidoscope unless a bowel preparation more thorough than enemas is given and then it would probably only be worthwhile using the colonoscope in patients who are above average risk for colorectal neoplasia.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study was designed to assess the usefulness of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes, compared with conventional videoscopes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first prototype XCF-QAY1 and the latter prototype XCF-Q240A1 used in this study can be varied to 4 levels of stiffness of tube insertion during examination. In 352 consecutive colonoscopic examinations performed using these and two conventional scopes, the following data were recorded: time for intubation to the cecum, frequency of changes in the patients' posture, frequency of abdominal pressure attempts, and pain score. The degree of stiffness of the insertion tube and the examiners' impressions score were recorded only in procedures where the variable-stiffness scopes were used. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between colonoscopes in the pain score. Total colonoscopy rate was 97.4%. The frequency of usage of the varying stiffness control in the colon according to site was as follows: descending colon, 57.3%; transverse colon, 32.8%, sigmoid colon, 7.6%; and ascending colon, 2.3%. A significant difference in the mean time for intubation to the cecum between the XCF-Q240A1 and conventional scopes was observed. Moreover, there were significant differences in the frequency of abdominal pressure attempts and changes in the patient's posture between conventional scopes and the new scopes. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that only one scope, the XCF-Q240A1, is needed for any colonic examination by any examiner.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients.

OBJECTIVES: Application of a new variable stiffness colonoscope (VSC) is expected to control loop formation and to lessen patient discomfort. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of VSC with a conventional colonoscope (CC) in unsedated colonoscopy, based on the experience of examiners. METHODS: Four-hundred sixty-seven patients were randomly assigned to undergo colonoscopy with either VSC or CC by an endoscopist, including experienced and less-experienced examiners. The percentages of completed procedure and time to cecal intubation were recorded. Patients were asked to rate pain on a 5-point pain score. RESULTS: The percentages of completed procedure with VSC and CC were 98% and 95%, respectively, by less-experienced hands, and 99% and 98%, respectively, by experienced hands. Time for cecal intubation with VSC and CC was 15.7 and 18.5 min, respectively, by less-experienced hands, and 9.8 and 10.6 min, respectively, by experienced hands. A significantly lower mean pain score was noted in VSC patients compared with CC patients, irrespective of experience of the examiner. The percent of patients rating the procedure as moderately or severely painful was significantly lower with VSC than with CC, both in less-experienced (19% vs 40%; p < 0.01) and experienced hands (15% vs 26%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that VSC allows favorable examination compared with CC regarding completeness, time to cecal intubation, and comfort of patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy, irrespective of the examiner's experience. These features suggest VSC as the preferred colonoscope for patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy remains technically difficult in 10-20% of procedures due to variable colonic anatomy and fixation. The ability to vary endoscope shaft flexibility may help insertion to the caecum. METHODS: Consecutive patients attending for day case colonoscopy were randomised to examination with either the conventional Olympus CF200HL (200HL) or a new variable stiffness (VS) colonoscope. Intubation time, use of stiffening function, and patient pain scores were compared. RESULTS: Of 100 cases, 43 were performed with the 200HL and 57 with the VS. Four incomplete examinations occurred with the 200HL (two sigmoid fixations, two benign strictures) and two with the VS (one obstructing cancer, one fixed sigmoid). Changing to the paediatric scope was successful in all but one patient from each group (obstructive lesions). Stiff mode was applied 23 times in 18 patients and was effective in 15 of these. Intubation time was quicker with the VS (median 6 minutes 32 seconds) than with the 200HL (median 10 minutes 35 seconds) (p = 0.0005). Pain scores were less with the VS (median 7) than with the 200HL (median 24) (p = 0.0081). CONCLUSIONS: The variable stiffness colonoscope combines paediatric shaft characteristics with the ability to stiffen when needed. This instrument significantly reduces intubation time and patient discomfort. Further comparisons should be made with the newest colonoscopes which are less stiff.

Colonic Diseases↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of pancreas and other abdominal organs by colonoscopic ultrasound.

We report a case where colonoscopic ultrasound was used to evaluate the pancreas. In this case the usual method of evaluating the body of the pancreas by upper gastrointestinal ultrasound was unsuccessful because of the presence of a large hiatal hernia. The other abdominal organs evaluated by colonoscopic ultrasound included the ileo-cecal valve, kidney, liver, spleen and prostate. To our knowledge this is the first case where ultrasonic colonoscope has been used to evaluate the body of the pancrease.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[A case of primary jejunal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by enteroscopy using pediatric colonoscope].

A 39-year-old man presented with dizziness and melena for 2 months. Abdominal CT scan showed constrictive wall thickening with enhancement and proximal loop dilatation of the jejunum. On endoscopic examination, there was large amount of bile stained fluid in duodenum. Enteroscopy using pediatric colonoscope demonstrated an encircling mass with obstruction approximately 20 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. Endoscopic jejunal biopsy showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Small intestinal adenocarcinoma is uncommonly encountered in clinical practice. Because small intestine is relatively inaccessible via routine endoscopy, diagnosis of small intestinal neoplasm is often delayed for several months after the onset of symptoms. Most of the patients are diagnosed in advanced stage. Therefore, when a small bowel neoplasm is suspected, enteroscopy is the most useful study. If enteroscope is not available, enteroscopy using pediatric colonoscope may permit earlier preoperative diagnosis. We report a case of primary jejunal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy using pediatric colonoscope.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1990

Invasive colorectal adenomas: surgery versus colonoscopic polypectomy.

Of 6,426 colonoscopies performed in 1978-1987, 66 invasive colorectal adenomatous polyps were removed in 58 examinations. The study group included 36 (62%) men and 22 (38%) women with an age range of 42-96 years. Forty-three patients had invasive pedunculated polyps and 15 had invasive sessile polyps. Following the colonoscopic polypectomy, secondary surgical resection was done in 19 patients with pedunculated polyps and in 13 patients with sessile polyps. The operative specimens showed that the colonoscopic polypectomy removed the entire cancerous focus in all patients with pedunculated polyps, including those with stalk invasion. In contrast, most cases with sessile polyps turned out on operation to be Dukes' B or C carcinoma. Follow-up (mean 4.4 years) was available for 53 (93%) patients: none of 24 unoperated patients with pedunculated polyps suffered from local recurrence. We conclude that colonoscopic polypectomy is sufficient for invasive pedunculated polyps, provided that histology shows that the resection margins are free of tumoral cells. Surgery is recommended for all invasive sessile polyps.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Colonoscopic polypectomy: indication, technique, and therapeutic implications.

The flexible fibroscopic colonoscope has changed the way we approach colonic disease. The technique of safe, effective colonoscopy is discussed including the indications and contraindications for therapeutic intervention via the colonoscope. The techniques of polypectomy is described, including some tips for methodology gained by the broad experience of the author, and admonition against the possible complications which can be life-threatening. The application for polypectomy in the presence of in-situ or invasive cancer is presented. The possible future development of colonoscopic and laparoscopic techniques are presented. The article concludes with a discussion of the monumental work of the National Polyp Study documenting that patients undergoing polypectomy have a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer. Application of the knowledge to the general population requires the identification of at-risk populations.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Characteristics of metachronous colorectal carcinoma occurring despite colonoscopic surveillance.

PURPOSE: Metachronous colorectal cancer still occurs in a small percentage of patients, despite colonoscopic surveillance. Cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer for which there is a high risk of metachronous cancer show distinctive DNA changes termed replication errors (RER+). Ten to 20 percent of sporadic colorectal cancers are also RER+. The aim of this study was to identify factors predictive of metachronous colorectal cancer, despite colonoscopic surveillance. Clinicopathologic characteristics and RER status of cancers were examined. METHODS: Colorectal cancer patients, who entered into a surveillance program of being examined with colonoscopy within six months of surgery and then at intervals of three years thereafter, were reviewed. The 433 patients compliant with the protocol who had had more than one colonoscopy had been followed up for a mean of 3.8 +/- 2.2 years. DNA was extracted from archival paraffin-embedded cancer tissue for determination of RER status. RESULTS: Ten cases of metachronous cancer were identified, giving a rate of 0.61 percent per year. The site of the index cancer in patients who later developed metachronous cancer was predominantly proximal (P = 0.0007), and these cancers were more likely to have mucinous histology (P < 0.0005). Three of 10 (30 percent) index cancers were RER+, which was not significantly different from unselected series of control colorectal cancers in which 20 of 108 (18.5 percent) were RER+. DISCUSSION: This study documents the rate of metachronous cancer among patients compliant with a defined colonoscopic screening program and suggests that the risk is highest in patients with a proximal mucinous cancer. RER status does not appear to be a very strong predictive factor, and this study does not support its use as a guide to the frequency of surveillance colonoscopy. More data would be required to determine if RER positivity conferred a relative risk of 3.3 or less.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Colonoscopic perforations.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the medical and surgical treatment of colonoscopic perforations. METHODS: A retrospective review of colonoscopic perforations from 1970 to 1999 was performed. RESULTS: In 30 years, 34,620 colonoscopies resulted in 31 (0.09 percent) perforations. Eighteen (58 percent) resulted from therapeutic colonoscopies, whereas 13 (42 percent) occurred after diagnostic colonoscopies. Sixteen perforations (52 percent) were identified during the procedure, 13 (42 percent) within 24 hours, and two (6 percent) within 48 hours. Twenty patients (65 percent) underwent surgical therapy, and 11 (35 percent) were treated medically with intestinal rest and intravenous antibiotics. In the medically treated group, one patient required rehospitalization for percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess, and one patient died after requesting no further treatment because of an underlying terminal medical condition. Three patients failed medical treatment and required surgical intervention. One underwent repair with proximal diversion, whereas the remaining two received a colorrhaphy without resection or diversion. In the surgical treatment group, nine patients received colorrhaphy without diversion, seven underwent resection with primary anastomosis, and four had resection with diversion. CONCLUSION: Selected patients with colonoscopic perforation may be safely treated nonoperatively. Surgical treatment is reserved for patients with a large perforation or diffuse peritonitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Radiographic changes after colonoscopic decompression for acute pseudo-obstruction.

PURPOSE: Colonoscopy has been the principal tool for decompression in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, known as Ogilvie's syndrome. The objectives of this study were to determine the immediate effect of colonoscopy on the cecal diameter (measured on supine radiographs) and to delineate possible correlations in the diameters of dilated segments of the colon. METHODS: The charts and radiographs of 24 patients who had colonoscopic decompression for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction between 1992 and 1997 at the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of California, San Diego Hospitals were reviewed. We measured cecal, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon diameters on serial radiographs up to the point of clinical resolution. RESULTS: Mean +/- standard deviation cecal diameter change (between initial and post-decompression films) was -2+/-3.4 cm at four hours and -2.2+/-3.3 cm one day after decompression. On the daily radiographs between colonoscopic decompression and clinical resolution, there was a close correlation between the diameter of the cecum and that of the transverse colon (P<0.05). There was no correlation between the cecal diameter and that of the descending or sigmoid colon. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic decompression only causes a small decrease in cecal size in the patient with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Dilation patterns of the cecum and transverse colon are significantly correlated in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. This correlation provides additional support to the contention that the same pathophysiology affects these two segments of the colon.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas Endosurgery Institute experience.

PURPOSE: The advent of laparoscopic surgery has altered the manner by which surgical specialties address pathologies of the abdominal cavity. This advance in technology has also changed colorectal surgery. One of the more common procedures of colorectal surgery is segmental resection for polyps that are large, broad based, or inaccessible for colonoscopic removal. We present a technique combining colonoscopy and laparoscopy to remove troublesome polyps without the need for segmental resections. METHODS: From May 1990 to September 1999 laparoscopic-monitored colonic polypectomies were performed in 47 patients, with a total of 60 polyps being removed. After laparoscopic mobilization of the involved segment of the colon, the proximal bowel is cross-clamped and the colonoscope passed to the involved portion of the colon. The polyp is then presented to the colonoscopist by the laparoscopist facilitating removal. The serosal surface is monitored for any indications of transluminal injury, and the area is repaired if needed. All polyps undergo immediate frozen section analysis. If the pathologic evaluation indicates malignancy then a segmental resection may be performed, otherwise the patients are decompressed and fed within a short time before discharge. RESULTS: The polyps were located most commonly in the ascending colon (18 polyps), transverse colon (12 polyps), and cecum (12 polyps). The most common histopathologic diagnosis was tubulovillous adenoma in 28 polyps followed by villous adenoma in 11 polyps. In three cases histopathologic diagnosis revealed malignancy necessitating segmental resection (1 low anterior resection and 2 right hemicolectomies), which were performed laparoscopically. Patients received a liquid diet within 6 hours, were discharged in an average of 21 hours, and returned to full activity, usually within days. The only complication presented in this group of patients was an umbilical port seroma. Virtually all patients (97 percent) behaved as if only a colonoscopy had been performed. Pain at the trocar sites was managed with acetaminophen 600 mg by mouth as needed. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-monitored colonoscopic polypectomy allows patients to undergo removal of colonic polyps without a segmental resection. This less invasive procedure yields recovery times similar to that of colonoscopy alone, and the potential complications of a segmental resection are avoided. All polyps are examined by frozen section, and if a malignancy is encountered, a laparoscopic resection can be performed.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1992

Dysplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis: implications for colonoscopic surveillance.

Mucosal dysplasia has been used as a marker for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis considered to be most at risk of developing cancer, and its identification is the basis for colonoscopic surveillance programs. To evaluate the reliability of this premise, colectomy specimens from two groups of patients who had undergone surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis (50 with cancer and 50 without) were retrieved. The groups were matched by age, sex, duration of disease, disease extent, and symptoms at the time of surgery. Using a standard technique of multiple random biopsies, we utilized the standard colonoscopic biopsy forceps to obtain four biopsies from mucosa that was not macroscopically suspicious for dysplasia or cancer in eight defined regions in each of the 100 colon specimens. This technique mimicked exactly the methods used in our clinical surveillance program. All 3,200 biopsies were evaluated blindly by one pathologist for presence and grade of dysplasia. Twenty-six percent of colons with an established cancer harbored no dysplasia in any biopsy from any region in the colon. While an overall association between the presence of cancer and high-grade dysplasia was detected (relative risk = 9.00; 95 percent CI of 2.73-29.67), the sensitivity and specificity of random colonic biopsies to detect concomitant carcinoma were 0.74 and 0.74, respectively. These findings prompt concern that reliance on random biopsies, obtained during colonoscopic surveillance, may be misplaced.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

A conservative approach to adenomas containing invasive carcinoma removed colonoscopically.

A controversy exists as to the correct therapeutic approach to colorectal polyps that contain malignancy and are removed colonoscopically. This paper presents our experience in the management of such polyps. Between 1977 and 1983, a total of 117 patients underwent colonoscopic polypectomy for 178 adenomas. Nine adenomas from nine patients showed carcinomatous invasion across the line of muscularis mucosae. None of these carcinomas was poorly differentiated and in all but two cases there was histologic evidence of complete excision. Seven patients whose adenomas containing foci of malignant changes were treated by polypectomy alone are alive without recurrence at periods from six months to over five years (mean, 40 months). The two patients in whom endoscopic removal of cancerous adenomas was found to be either doubtfully complete or incomplete, had further surgical treatment; both are alive and well after one and five years, respectively. Nine other patients whose adenomas containing malignant changes were considered unsuitable for colonoscopic polypectomy, underwent surgical resection and in none was regional lymph node or distant metastases found at laparotomy. In conclusion, our results of local endoscopic excision for adenomas containing malignant changes suggest a conservative approach to such polyps and this policy is supported by the finding that, in none of our operated patients was there any evidence of metastatic disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Colonoscopic excision of large and giant colorectal polyps. Technical implications and results over eight years.

Large polyps are sessile or pedunculated lesions that are larger than or equal to 3 cm in size. Sixty-six colonoscopic piecemeal excisions of large pedunculated and sessile polyps (75 percent of 88 recognized large polyps) were performed over eight years. The macroscopic feature of the lesions and the result of an extensive snare biopsy were the deciding factors for endoscopic as opposed to surgical removal. Only three complications (4.5 percent) were recorded (two hemorrhages and one colonic wall burn syndrome), none of which required surgery. Fifty patients with 52 adenomatous lesions had colonoscopic follow-up (range, 3 to 85 months). Of 36 sessile adenomas, two cases of residual (5.5 percent) and four of recurrent disease (11 percent) were observed. Colonoscopic removal is an alternative to local surgical excision of large benign colorectal polyps, and often can be an alternative method to elective colectomy in elderly and high-risk patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps not suitable for colonoscopic removal.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic removal of large sessile polyps is sometimes technically difficult and is associated with an increased risk of complications. Moreover, the incidence of invasive carcinoma within these polyps is not negligible. Laparoscopic colorectal resection has been recommended in the treatment of these large polyps. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps that were not suitable for colonoscopic removal. METHODS: Forty-five patients (28 men and 17 women) who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with the preoperative diagnosis of colorectal polyps were analyzed. The reasons for surgical resection were large sessile polyps (n = 34), difficult position (n = 2), recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (n = 1), and the presence of intramucosal malignancy on histology after colonoscopic polypectomy (n = 8). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 66.7 years (range, 33-89). Previous abdominal operation had been performed in 12 patients (26.7%). Two patients underwent subtotal colectomy because of multiple polyps (14 and 19, respectively). Synchronous resection of other organs was performed in two patients (a right salpingo-oophorectomy and a right adrenalectomy). Intraoperative complications occurred in two patients, and two patients (4.5%) required conversion because of perforation of the colon during dissection and dense adhesions, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. Complications occurred in seven patients (15.6%), and they included postoperative ileus (n = 4), anastomotic leakage (n = 1), urinary retention (n = 1), and urinary tract infection (n = 1). Reoperation was required in one patient for anastomotic leakage. The median hospital stay was 6 days. The histopathology of colorectal polyps showed tubular (n = 12), tubulovillous (n = 13), and villous adenoma (n = 12); mixed adenomatous/hyperolastic polyps (n = 2); inflammatory polyp (n = 1); and colonic lipoma (n = 1). Four patients, who had previous polypectoray with intramucosal malignancy, had no residual pathology. The median size was 3.0 cm. Invasive carcinoma was found in 16 patients (35.6%). The median number of lymph node sampling was six, and two patients had lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic polyps that were not amendable for colonoscopic removal were associated with a high incidence of malignant invasion. Laparoscopic colectomy offers safe and effective management of these polyps with the benefits of early postoperative recovery.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Patient factors associated with a faster insertion of the colonoscope.

BACKGROUND: There are many factors involved in a difficult colonoscopy. Our hypothesis is that colonic intubation is more difficult in thin patients. We consider it beneficial to know a priori who would be in need of specialized equipment or maneuvers for a successful colonoscopy. METHODS: Over two years, 435 consecutive patients who underwent elective colonoscopy by one surgeon were included in this prospective study. Patients who underwent prior colectomy, who had cancer other than that of the cecum, or who had had an emergent endoscopy were excluded from the study. The time it took to insert the colonoscope from the anus to the cecum was recorded and rounded to the nearest minute. For statistical analysis, we considered gender, age, body mass index (BMI), abdominal girth, diagnosis, presence or absence of prior pelvic surgery, need for external compression, and quality of the bowel preparation. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the median time of intubation between males and females. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant correlation between the BMI, abdominal girth, presence or absence of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery, and the length of insertion of the endoscope. Statistical significance was reached between the male and female. The median time to insert the colonoscope in the males was 7 min (mean = 8.14 min), while in females it was 10 min (mean = 10.6 min). CONCLUSIONS: Females had a significantly longer time of insertion of the colonoscope compared to males. Neither abdominal girth nor body mass seems to reflect the volume of the peritoneal cavity. It seems possible that there is a content-container mismatch in thin female patients. We suggest repeating the study using other anthropometric measurements to calculate the intraperitoneal volume. This may help select the patients who would benefit from a deeper sedation or more specialized equipment.

Adult↗