Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cell Phone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[The effect of cell phones on pacemaker function].

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to examine if there existed a risk from interference of cellular phones on patients with implanted permanent pacemakers. The study comprised 144 patients (134 VVI/VVIR and 10 DDD/DDDR) with permanent pacemakers of different manufactures. METHODS: During the routine pacemaker check, cellular phone aerial (Nokia 1610; GSM Standard) was placed against the skin of patients above the spot of pacemaker implantation, while the phone calls were repeated and ECG was continuously monitored. The effect of cellular phone on pacemaker was established upon: a) preexisting parameters of electric pacemaker stimulation; b) minimal ventricular rate of 90 beats/min, while electric stimulation parameters were set to their most sensitive values (MSV). RESULTS: Only in 9 (6.25%) patients was observed intermittent pacemaker inhibition, when pacemaker settings were on preexisting values of electric stimulation, while in 17 patients (11.8%) inhibition was noticed, when pacemaker settings were changed to their MSV. Besides, programmed values of electric stimulation in our patients remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Although the electromagnetic interference interactions of cellular phones on pacemaker function were observed in relatively small number of our patients, we were of the opinion that pacemaker-dependent patients should avoid the use of cellular phones.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Effects of prolonged wakefulness combined with alcohol and hands-free cell phone divided attention tasks on simulated driving.

Simulated driving ability was assessed following administration of alcohol, at an estimated blood level of 0.05%, and combined prolonged wakefulness, while participants were undertaking divided attention tasks over a hands-free mobile phone. Divided attention tasks were structured to provide a sustained cognitive workload to the subjects. Twenty three young healthy individuals drove 10 km simulated driving under four conditions in a counterbalanced, within-subject design: alcohol, alcohol and 19 h wakefulness, alcohol and 24 h wakefulness, and while sober. Study measures were: simulated driving, self-reported sleepiness, critical flicker fusion threshold (CFFT), Stroop word-colour interference test (Stroop) and simple visual reaction times (SVRT). As expected, subjective sleepiness was highly correlated with both sleep restriction and alcohol consumption. The combination of alcohol and 24 h sustained wakefulness produced the highest driving impairment, significantly beyond the alcohol effect itself. Concurrent alcohol and 19 h wakefulness significantly affected only driving time-to-collision. No significant changes of study measures occurred following alcohol intake in unrestricted sleep conditions. CFFT, SVRT and Stroop results showed a similar trend in the four study conditions. Thus apparently 'safe' blood alcohol levels in combination with prolonged wakefulness resulted in significant driving impairments. In normal sleep conditions alcohol effects on driving were partially counteracted by the concomitant hands-free phone based psychometric tasks.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2005

HIV pill reminder device shows some adherence improvement. Technology now switched to cell phone.

Researchers studying a population of HIV patients found that a pill reminder improved adherence for those who were memory impaired. "One reason patients don't take medications is because they simply forget it, and it's more of an issue in the population we studied because some started with mild cognitive impairment," says Adriana Andrade, MD, MPH, an assistant professor at Johns Hopkins University Division of Infectious Diseases in Baltimore, MD.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2004

Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models.

We reviewed articles using computational RF dosimetry to compare the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) to anatomically correct models of the human head. Published conclusions based on such comparisons have varied widely. We looked for reasons that might cause apparently similar comparisons to produce dissimilar results. We also looked at the information needed to adequately compare the results of computational RF dosimetry studies. We concluded studies were not comparable because of differences in definitions, models, and methodology. Therefore we propose a protocol, developed by an IEEE standards group, as an initial step in alleviating this problem. The protocol calls for a benchmark validation study comparing the SAM phantom to two anatomically correct models of the human head. It also establishes common definitions and reporting requirements that will increase the comparability of all computational RF dosimetry studies of the human head.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2003

Nonlinear changes in brain electrical activity due to cell phone radiation.

We studied the effect of an electromagnetic field from a cellular telephone on brain electrical activity, using a novel analytical method based on a nonlinear model. The electroencephalogram (EEG) from rabbits was embedded in phase space and local recurrence plots were calculated and quantified using recurrence quantitation analysis to permit statistical comparisons between filtered segments of exposed and control epochs from individual rabbits. When the rabbits were exposed to the radiation from a standard cellular telephone (800 MHz band, 600 mW maximum radiated power) under conditions that simulated normal human use, the EEG was significantly affected in nine of ten animals studied. The effect occurred beginning about 100 ms after initiation of application of the field and lasted approximately 300 ms. In each case, the fields increased the randomness in the EEG. A control procedure ruled out the possibility that the observations were a product of the method of analysis. No differences were found between exposed and control epochs in any animal when the experiment was repeated after the rabbits had been sacrificed, indicating that absorption of radiation by the EEG electrodes could not account for the observed effect. No effect was seen when deposition of energy in the brain was minimized by repositioning the radiating antenna from the head to the chest, showing that the type of tissue that absorbed the energy determined the observed changes in the EEG. We conclude that, in normal use, the fields from a standard cellular telephone can alter brain function as a consequence of absorption of energy by the brain.

Action Potentials↗