Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Amisulpride”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Dosage finding and outcome in the treatment of schizophrenic inpatients with amisulpride. Results of a drug utilization observation study.

OBJECTIVES: Amisulpride is an unique neuroleptic drug insofar as it has a dual pharmacodynamic effect. At low doses it blocks selectively presynaptic autoreceptors, and at high doses it blocks postsynaptic D(2)/D(3) receptors. This allows the dosage to be adjusted and the treatment tailored to various clinical situations. It is unknown whether this pharmacological property has any bearing for routine treatment. The questions are: which dosages of amisulpride are chosen by physicians in the treatment of schizophrenic inpatients and does this dosage handling deviate from prescription guidelines?; which factors can explain dosage selection, and what is the treatment outcome with different dosages? The study pertains to drug management and dosage finding as principal factors in explaining positive and negative medication results. METHODS: In a drug utilization observation study the prescribing of amisulpride for 811 schizophrenic inpatients from 240 psychiatric hospitals was monitored for 8 weeks. Standardized assessment included dosage, the positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS), the clinical global impression rating (CGI), the patients' subjective reaction to amisulpride, psychosocial functioning, EPS and other adverse events. The mean observation period was 49 days. RESULTS: The mean initial daily dose of amisulpride was 361 mg/day. The mean daily dose at day 56 was on average 550 (SD 266) mg/d, ranging from 100 mg to 1600 mg. 17.9% of patients received a maximum dose up to 399 mg/d, 48.1% between 400 and 799 mg/d, and 25.5% 800 mg/d and higher. Higher doses were preferably prescribed for males, patients with involuntary admission, patients with paranoid schizophrenia with acute exacerbation, high CGI and high PANSS-positive scores. Patients with higher doses of amisulpride at the same time received higher rates of additional other neuroleptic drugs. Higher doses yield better results in very severe cases. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribed dosages were in the lower range of what is recommended for acute cases. Dosage was significantly influenced by the severity of the illness. Polypharmacy was the rule rather than the exception. Efficacy rates under conditions of routine care were similar to the results from controlled clinical trials, which speaks for their generalizability. Very severe cases profit from higher doses.

Adult↗

Amisulpride is an "atypical" antipsychotic associated with low weight gain.

RATIONALE: It is possible that amisulpride, with its unique receptor binding profile, is not associated with significant weight gain, a serious side effect of most "atypical" antipsychotic drugs. While most "atypicals" have a high affinity for both dopamine and serotonin receptors, amisulpride has only dopamine receptor action. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the weight gain associated with amisulpride. METHODS: A pooled database of prospective randomised amisulpride studies was analysed. The mean weight gain after 10 weeks of treatment was estimated by regression analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 1422 patients were pooled, providing 1392 patients who were eligible for evaluation. In the main analysis of all effective doses (50-1200 mg/day) the mean weight gain associated with amisulpride at 10 weeks was 0.8 kg, 95% CI (0.48-1.18). Linear regression showed no dependence of weight gain on daily dose levels (P=0.7). When patients with mean daily doses below 400 mg/day were excluded in a sensitivity analysis, the mean weight gain at ten weeks was again 0.80 kg, 95% CI (0.47-1.16) with n=874. The mean weight gain at study endpoints in 1-year studies was 1.4 kg, 95% CI (0.85-1.90), n=548. CONCLUSION: Amisulpride is an atypical antipsychotic associated with low weight gain.

Amisulpride↗

Stereospecific determination of amisulpride, a new benzamide derivative, in human plasma and urine by automated solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography on a chiral column. application to pharmacokinetics.

Amisulpride, a drug belonging to the benzamide series, demonstrates antischizophrenic and antidepressant (antidysthymic) properties in man. For the pharmacokinetic studies of the racemic drug in man, a method of determination based on solid-phase extraction (SPE) from plasma and HPLC on a stereoselective column was developed. For this aim, one millilitre of plasma, after the addition of the internal standard, tiapride or metoclopramide, is diluted with a borate buffer at pH 9, then automatically loaded onto a SPE C18 100-mg column. The column is washed with different solvents, then eluted with 0.5 ml of methanol. After evaporation of the eluted fraction, the residue is reconstituted in 0.25 ml of eluent mixture. An aliquot is injected onto the HPLC column, a Chiralpak AS, equilibrated with an eluent mixture constituted by n-hexane-ethanol, (67:33, v/v) containing 0.2% (v/v) of diethylamine (DEA) or n-heptane-ethanol, (70:29.8, v/v) containing 0.2% of DEA and connected to a UV detector set at 280 nm or to a fluorimetric detector set at lambda ex = 280 nm and lambda cm = 370 nm. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) in human plasma is 2.5 ng ml-1 for both S-(-)- and R-(+)-amisulpride isomers with both detection methods. The method has been demonstrated to be linear in the range 2.5-320 ng ml-1 for both R-(+)- and S-(-)-amisulpride in human plasma with both UV and fluorescence detection. Absolute recovery of S-(-)- and R-(+)-amisulpride enantiomers from human plasma, as well as selectivity, precision and accuracy have been demonstrated to be satisfactory for pharmacokinetics in man and equivalent for both the proposed methods that have been cross-validated on real dosed human plasma samples. The methods have been used for clinical pharmacokinetic studies allowing pharmacokinetic parameters for amisulpride enantiomers in agreement with those obtained for the racemate to be obtained. After dilution with water, urinary samples from subjects treated with amisulpride racemate can be analysed according to the method used for plasma.

Amisulpride↗

Effects of amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic which blocks preferentially presynaptic dopamine autoreceptors, on integrated functional cerebral activity in the rat.

Amisulpride, a benzamide derivative with an atypical neuroleptic profile relieves the negative symptoms of schizophrenia when administered at low doses (50-150 mg). In an attempt to define the anatomical substrates involved in this action we have studied the effects of amisulpride on regional cerebral glucose utilisation (RCGU) in the awake lightly restrained rat, by quantitative autoradiography using [14C]2-deoxyglucose ([14C]2-DG). Amisulpride was administered 1 h before [14C]2DG i.v. injection, at a dose of 5 mg/kg which resulted in a striatal D2 receptor occupancy of 10% similar to that induced by doses of this compound used for the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Amisulpride induced significant RCGU increases in cortical areas, in visual relays, in auditory structures and in several limbic structures. The pattern of changes in RCGU seen with amisulpride clearly differs from that of haloperidol, given at a dose resulting in a similar occupancy of striatal D2 receptors (0.01 mg/kg), which was mostly ineffective. The amisulpride-induced activation of RCGU in specific brain areas involved in the control of cognitive functions and motivational and emotional behavior, may at least in part, explain the efficacy of this compound in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Amisulpride↗

Carmoxirole is able to reduce amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia without affecting its central effect.

Prolactin blood level and apomorphine-induced yawning were studied in rats treated with the substituted benzamide amisulpride in association with bromocriptine or carmoxirole; two dopamine D(2) receptor agonists with high or low propensity to cross the brain-blood barrier, respectively. Administration of amisulpride produced a maximum increase in rat serum prolactin level (315+/-18%) vs. vehicle-treated animals (ED(50)=0.25+/-0.017 mg/kg, s.c.). The concurrent administration of carmoxirole or bromocriptine completely reversed the hyperprolactinemia induced by amisulpride (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) (ID(50)=14.9+/-0.8 mg/kg and 0.81+/-0.03 mg/kg, respectively). Carmoxirole (15 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect yawning induced by apomorphine (0.08 mg/kg, s.c.) nor amisulpride (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) blockade of apomorphine-induced yawning. Conversely, a significant increase in the number of yawns was observed when bromocriptine (0.8 mg/kg, i.p.) was associated with apomorphine in the absence or presence of amisulpride. These results suggested that a peripheral dopamine D(2) receptor agonists could be a useful tool in alleviating amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia without possibly affecting its central effect.

Amisulpride↗

Effect of the amisulpride isomers on rat prolactinemia.

The effects on rat serum prolactin level of the two isomers constituting the racemic form of amisulpride were compared. (S-)-amisulpride induced hyperprolactinemia at lower doses (ED(50) = 0.09 +/- 0.01 mg/kg) than racemic- (ED(50) = 0.24 +/- 0.03 mg/kg) and (R+)-amisulpride (ED(50) = 4.13 +/- 0.05 mg/kg), in accord with their affinities for pituitary dopamine D(2) receptor (K(i) = 3.8 +/- 0.2, 6.4 +/- 0.2 and 143.3 +/- 2.3 nM, respectively). At doses twice the ED(50), (S-)-amisulpride produced a maximal increase in prolactin level similar to that of the racemic form (403 +/- 21% and 425 +/- 15%, respectively), but higher than that of (R+)-amisulpride (198 +/- 8%). These results suggest that the hyperprolactinemia induced by the racemic-amisulpride is mostly due to its (S-)-isomer.

Amisulpride↗

Amisulpride versus fluoxetine in patients with dysthymia or major depression in partial remission: a double-blind, comparative study.

In a multicentre, double blind, parallel group study 281 patients with DSM III-R diagnosis of dysthymia or a single episode of major depression in partial remission were randomised to 3 months of treatment with amisulpride 50 mg/day or fluoxetine 20 mg/day. The baseline Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score was reduced by at least 50% in 74.1% of patients (103/139) with amisulpride and 67.4% (87/129) with fluoxetine (P =0.230). No significant differences between treatment groups were found in the reductions in mean total score with the MADRS, Widlöcher psychomotor retardation scale, Sheehan disability scale, and CGI. Anxiety measured by HAM-A total mean score decreased significantly more with amisulpride (63%) than with fluoxetine (54%; P = 0.021). There were 13 dropouts due to adverse events with amisulpride and ten with fluoxetine. The number of patients reporting at least one adverse event was similar in the two groups (amisulpride 47.5%; fluoxetine 40.9%). As expected, in the amisulpride group endocrine-like adverse events in female patients were the most common, while nausea, dyspepsia, anorexia and insomnia occurred more frequently with fluoxetine.

Adolescent↗

Lack of effect of amisulpride on the pharmacokinetics and safety of lithium.

Lithium may be used as adjuvant therapy in schizophrenic patients and antipsychotics can be employed during the early phases of lithium therapy in patients with bipolar disorder. The issue of interactions between lithium and antipsychotics is therefore important. This study investigates the potential influence of repeated administration of amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic, on the pharmacokinetics of lithium at steady state. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers (aged 1833 yr) received lithium carbonate (500 mg b.i.d.) for 14 d. All subjects were shown to have stable lithium serum concentrations after 57 d and were then randomized to receive double-blind administration of amisulpride (100 mg b.i.d.) or placebo bid from day 8 of lithium administration. Complete pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on days 7 and 14 for lithium and trough plasma concentrations on days 10, 12 and 14 for amisulpride. Co-administration of amisulpride appeared to exert no effect on the pharmacokinetics of lithium. All treatments were well tolerated and safety assessment revealed no differences between the lithium+placebo and lithium+amisulpride groups. This finding permits the flexible use of amisulpride in patients already receiving lithium therapy.

Adolescent↗

Asymptomatic bradycardia associated with amisulpride.

Well-known adverse effects of amisulpride include nausea, insomnia or tiredness, gastrointestinal, extrapyramidal and endocrine symptoms. Cardiac disorders, however, appear to be an extremely rare complication of the drug. Only a few case reports on this complication have been published so far, which deal with QT prolongation, hypotension, hypertension and palpitations. Bradycardia has not yet been mentioned. Here, we will report on a case of asymptomatic bradycardia that developed subsequent to therapeutic doses of amisulpride in a 25-year-old male patient with chronic paranoid-hallucinatory schizophrenia. The patient had been rehospitalized for an acute exacerbation of the psychosis. When the patient failed to respond at the beginning of hospitalization, the treatment was changed from clozapine to amisulpride. After a complete switchover to amisulpride, the patient's ECG showed sinus bradycardia and QT prolongation. When the daily dose of amisulpride was reduced from 800 mg/d to 600 mg/d, the patient's ECG quickly normalized (including blood pressure and pulse rate) within a few days. The patient did not report any cardiovascular-related complaints. Since the cardiovascular-specific diagnostics did not yield any indicative results, bradycardia may be a rare complication of amisulpride treatment.

Adult↗

Gender aspects in the clinical treatment of schizophrenic inpatients with amisulpride: a therapeutic drug monitoring study.

INTRODUCTION: It is assumed that female and male schizophrenic patients respond differentially to acute and chronic treatment with antipsychotics because of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors linked to hormonal and constitutional gender differences. However, to date no empirical evidence exists in support of this notion. METHODS: In a naturalistic clinical study, we investigated gender differences in a sample of schizophrenic inpatients with acute exacerbation treated with the atypical antipsychotic amisulpride, a selective dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist with proven antipsychotic efficacy. Prescribed amisulpride dose, plasma level, clinical response (CGI), and side effects (UKU) were assessed in 99 patients (62 % male, age 18-66 years) under antipsychotic monotherapy with amisulpride at daily doses > or = 400 mg. RESULTS: Female patients were significantly older (38.5 +/- 11.8 years) than male patients (32.3 +/- 10.9 years; P = 0.01). Prescribed amisulpride doses were comparable for men (673 +/- 216 mg) and women (665 +/- 229 mg). However, dose-corrected steady-state amisulpride plasma levels (men 0.41 +/- 0.31 ng/mL/mg; women 0.60 +/- 0.39 ng/mL/mg; P = 0.007) were significantly higher in female patients even after age adjustment. No significant differences between men and women emerged with respect to clinical response (77 % vs. 79 %, respectively) and the occurrence of any side effect (41 % vs. 37 %, respectively). DISCUSSION: Except for higher dose-related plasma amisulpride levels in women, the explorative study unveiled no clinically relevant gender-specific aspects regarding prescribed dose, effectiveness, and side effects.

Adult↗

In vivo extrastriatal and striatal D2 dopamine receptor blockade by amisulpride in schizophrenia.

Amisulpride, a substituted benzamide with high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors only, has been reported to have therapeutic effects on both negative and positive schizophrenic symptoms, although at distinct dose ranges (50-300 mg/day vs. 400-1,200 mg/day). The purpose of this study was to investigate the binding of amisulpride to extrastriatal (i.e., thalamus and temporal cortex) and striatal D2 dopamine receptors with respect to plasma amisulpride determinations. Ten patients with schizophrenia treated with amisulpride over a wide range of doses (25-1,200 mg/day) were studied. Positron emission tomography images were acquired by using 76Br-FLB-457, a highly specific antagonist of the D2 and D3 dopamine receptors. Binding indexes (BI) in the regions studied were estimated with reference to values from six healthy subjects. A curvilinear relationship was demonstrated between plasma concentration of amisulpride and the BI in extrastriatal regions. The BI also varied as a function of plasma concentration in striatum. Furthermore, the data provide evidence for different binding profiles: low plasma concentrations (28-92 ng/mL) induced marked extrastriatal binding and low striatal binding, whereas higher plasma concentrations (>153 ng/mL) induced marked binding both in extrastriatal and striatal regions. Dose-dependent differential binding profiles of amisulpride to D2 receptors in extrastriatal and striatal regions were demonstrated, and two therapeutic ranges of plasma concentrations for negative and positive schizophrenic symptoms, respectively, are suggested.

Adult↗

Amisulpride treatment of clozapine-induced hypersalivation in schizophrenia patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study.

The beneficial effect of sulpiride augmentation of clozapine therapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients is enhanced by its antisalivatory effect on clozapine-induced hypersalivation (CIH). Amisulpride, similar to sulpiride, is a substitute benzamide derivative with higher selective binding to the D2/D3 dopamine receptor. We hypothesized that add-on amisulpride would also be beneficial in controlling CIH. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study, 20 clozapine-treated schizophrenia (DSM-IV criteria) inpatients with CIH were randomly initially assigned to add-on amisulpride (nine patients; 400 mg/day up-titrated from 100 mg/day over 1 week) or placebo (11 patients). Primary outcome was change in the five-point Nocturnal Hypersalivation Rating Scale (NHRS). Other measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) and Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS). Mean NHRS indices were considerably lower with amisulpride (1.79 +/- 1.25) than with placebo (2.63 +/- 1.33) [F(1,38) = 5.36, P < 0.05]. With amisulpride treatment, there was a significant improvement on the negative symptoms subscale of the PANSS [F(3,57) = 3.76, P < 0.05], but not on the SAS, CGI or other subscales of the PANSS (all F < 1). Short-term amisulpride augmentation has a strong ameliorating effect on CIH. A long-term, large-scale study with a broader dose range is warranted to evaluate the stability of this effect across time.

Amisulpride↗

Amisulpride versus amineptine and placebo for the treatment of dysthymia.

Amisulpride, a selective antagonist for D2 and D3 dopamine receptors, acts preferentially on presynaptic receptors increasing dopaminergic transmission at low doses. In a multicentre, 3-month, placebo-controlled study, amisulpride (50 mg/day) was compared to amineptine (200 mg/day) in the treatment of primary dysthymia. A total of 323 patients were enrolled. Amisulpride and amineptine were found to be statistically superior to placebo (p < 0.0001) on the Clinical Global Impression (item 2): 63, 64 and 33% responders, respectively; improvement of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms scores following amisulpride or amineptine treatment was twice as high as with placebo (p < 0.0001). The adverse event profile of amisulpride was similar to that of placebo except for endocrine symptoms in female patients; amineptine showed mainly events linked to psychic activation (insomnia, nervousness). Results show that amisulpride can improve symptoms of chronic depression in dysthymia.

Amisulpride↗

Clinical advantages of amisulpride in the treatment of acute schizophrenia.

Five studies have been conducted with the atypical anti-psychotic amisulpride (100-1200 mg/day) involving 1358 patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia; four studies were short-term (4-8 weeks), double-blind studies and one was a 12-month, open, randomized comparison. Amisulpride improved positive symptoms consistently, and changes were more pronounced than with haloperidol, flupenthixol and risperidone; amisulpride showed a more rapid onset of action compared to haloperidol, and improvement in negative symptoms was more effective than with any comparator. An optimum response was obtained with amisulpride doses 400-800 mg/day. The long-term study confirmed the usefulness of amisulpride for maintenance treatment in schizophrenia, with a clear advantage over haloperidol, leading to better functioning and quality of life. Amisulpride caused fewer neurological side-effects than conventional anti-psychotics and less weight gain than risperidone, both of which are crucial factors for long-term compliance.

Acute Disease↗

A double-blind, randomised comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia: short-term results at two months.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the atypical antipsychotics amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multinational, double-blind randomised clinical trial. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with predominantly positive symptomatology were treated for six months with either amisulpride (200-800 mg/d) or olanzapine (5-20 mg/d). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term results were analysed after two months of treatment. The primary efficacy measure was the change of score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Other measures of efficacy and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: Psychotic symptoms, as measured on the BPRS score, improved with both treatments, amisulpride being equivalent to olanzapine. All BPRS factor scores, as well as depressive symptoms, improved to a similar extent with both treatments. Less than five per cent of patients withdrew for adverse events, and there was no evidence for the emergence of extrapyramidal symptoms with either treatment. Statistically significant greater weight gain (2.7 +/- 3.9 kg) was observed during the study in the olanzapine group, compared with the amisulpride group (0.9 +/- 3.2 kg, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Amisulpride and olanzapine show equivalent efficacy at 2 months in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Amisulpride offers a significant advantage in preserving body weight.

Adolescent↗

An open-label study of amisulpride in the treatment of mania.

BACKGROUND: Amisulpride is a selective D(2)-D(3) antagonist that has been reported to be effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. However, no prospective study to date has assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of this compound in mania. METHOD: Twenty DSM-IV-defined acutely ill manic bipolar patients with a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score of 20 or more entered this open, prospective, 6-week study. Assessments included the YMRS, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Bipolar Disorder, Modified (CGI-BP-M), and the systematic report of adverse events. Amisulpride was added to other medications, but other antipsychotics were not allowed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (70%) completed the study. Using last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analyses, amisulpride produced significant improvements on the YMRS (p = .0001), the HAM-D (p < .0141), and the overall (p = .0003), mania (p = .0001), and depression (p = .0268) subscales of the CGI-BP-M. The most common side effect was sedation (N = 5, 25%), but there were also some extrapyramidal symptoms, galactorrhea, insomnia, and agitation. The mean amisulpride dose was 680 mg/day (LOCF) and 786 mg/day in completers. CONCLUSIONS: This first prospective study on amisulpride in the treatment of mania suggests that, despite the limitations of the open, observational design and small sample size, amisulpride may be effective and reasonably safe in the treatment of bipolar mania. D(2) and D(3) antagonism may be involved in the mechanisms of the therapeutic response to antipsychotics in mania.

Adult↗

[Evaluation of efficacy and tolerance of amisulpride in treatment of schizophrenic psychoses].

Amisulpride is a benzamide derivative atypical antipsychotic characterized by selective blockade of dopamine D3 and D2 receptors, limbic selectivity and preferential blockade of dopamine autoreceptors at low doses. Its efficacy on predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia at low doses, and on the positive symptoms at doses from 400 to 1,200 mg/day has been demonstrated in several controlled studies. The aim of our study was to assess the use in psychiatric clinical practice under naturalistic conditions, efficacy and safety of amisulpride and patient's ability to cope with social skills during a 3-month period of treatment with a follow-up at 6 months. A total of 445 patients (293 men and 152 women), between 18 and 45 years of age, were included in the study DSM III-R criteria of schizophrenia, paranoid type (295.3), or schizophreniform disorder (295.4) were required for inclusion. The patients received amisulpride with flexible dosage between 600 and 1,200 mg/d during a 3-month period (792 mg/d +/- 318). Evaluation was based on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), on the Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), and on Clinical Global Improvement scale, completed at D0, D14, D28, D60 and D90. Safety was also assessed with a comprehensive statement of adverse events and with the Simpson-Angus scale of extra pyramidal symptoms. A scale of social adaptation (Echelle d'Adaptation PsychoSociale) was completed at D0, D90 and D180. During the 3-month period of treatment, 124 patients (27.9%) dropped out the trial, including 24 cases of inefficacy and 27 cases of concomitant events. Intent-to-treat analysis showed a significant improvement of BPRS scores (40.2 vs 67.6; p < 0.0001), of positive PANSS scores (13.9 vs 27.7; p < 0.0001), and negative PANSS scores (17.45 vs 28.3; p < 0.0001) between D0 and D90. CGI results confirmed these figures. Follow-up assessment at D180 showed a sustained response on BPRS ans PANSS scores. Amisulpride was well tolerated in the study, with 21% of patients reporting adverse events, in majority psychiatric or endocrine disturbances. Only seven adverse events were assessed as serious. Extra pyramidal symptoms remained low during the study, as measured with Simpson-Angus scale. The EAPS scale showed a significant improvement of social adaptation during the treatment, with a sustained response during the 3-month follow-up period. In conclusion, 600-1 200 mg/d of amisulpride is an effective and well tolerated treatment of schizophrenic disorders, as demonstrated through this 3-month study carried in a large sample of 445 patients. Besides results suggest that under treatment with amisulpride in schizophrenic patients patients' ability to social adaptation can be improved, which could facilitate their rehabilitation.

Adolescent↗

Amisulpride vs. risperidone in chronic schizophrenia: results of a 6-month double-blind study.

This multicenter, double-blind, randomized study evaluated the efficacy, safety and functional effects of two atypical antipsychotics, amisulpride and risperidone, in patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM IV) with a recent worsening of symptoms. It was planned as a non-inferiority trial. 309 patients received amisulpride (400-1,000 mg/day) or risperidone (4-10 mg/day) for six months. Amisulpride was demonstrated to be not inferior to risperidone with respect to the decrease in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline (90% 2-sided confidence interval (-5.6; 4.0)). Symptomatic improvement measured with the Brief Psychiatry Rating Scale (BPRS), the PANSS positive subscale, and the Bech Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale was similar in both groups. Amisulpride was significantly (p <.05) superior to risperidone in terms of response (>/=50% improvement in PANSS and BPRS total scores or "very much/much improved" on the Clinical Global Impression Scale) and also demonstrated better functional effects and subjective response. Both treatments were well tolerated and had a similar low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms; however, amisulpride was associated with less weight gain and endocrine/sexual symptoms.

Adolescent↗