Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “AMITRIPTYLINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of the effect of amitriptyline in standard and sustained-release formulations on cardiac systolic time intervals.

Eight healthy male volunteers were given single doses of 75 mg standard and sustained-release amitriptyline in a double-blind, crossover trial. Systolic time intervals (STI) were measured hourly on drug and base-line days. Plasma amitriptyline and nortriptyline were measured hourly on drug days. To correct for diurnal variations, STI values on drug days were compared with values of base-line days at the same hour. Both formulations of amitriptyline produced initial decreases in heart rate (followed by a return to normal values) and a significant decrease in ventricular electrical systole (QTc), which began before plasma amitriptyline could be detected. One of the eight volunteers showed T wave depression following amitriptyline. The preejection period (PEPc) increased significantly in three of the eight volunteers (max 19%), and this change was due to an increase in true isovolumetric contraction time (TICT). The left ventricular ejection time (LVETc) decreased significantly in all volunteers (5%, p less than 0.001), the change being greater after sustained-release amitriptyline. Standard amitriptyline produced larger changes than sustained-release amitriptyline in QTc and PEPc. The overall increase in the PEP/LVET ratio, indicating an impairment of cardiac function, was twice as large after standard than after sustained-release amitriptyline (38% and 16%, respectively). The possible mechanisms of cardiac effects of amitriptyline are discussed. Our findings indicate that a sustained-release preparation may be safer than a standard preparation of amitriptyline, particularly if there is a risk of cardiac complications.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Severe amitriptyline overdose: relationship between toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics.

The clinical features and toxicokinetics of amitriptyline were studied in nine patients with severe amitriptyline poisoning. Amitriptyline and amitriptyline metabolites were studied in plasma, red blood cells, and cerebral spinal fluid. Eight patients were intubated and six required assisted ventilation. Two patients had ventricular arrhythmias, three patients convulsions and two were hypotensive. All complications developed within four hours of admission. Early in the course of the intoxication the QRS duration correlated with plasma, unbound and red blood cell nortriptyline concentration. The QRS duration also correlated with unbound but not the plasma amitriptyline concentration. The level of consciousness correlated with the plasma and unbound amitriptyline both in alpha and beta phase and with red blood cell amitriptyline in alpha phase. There was no correlation between nortriptyline concentration and level of consciousness. No correlation between coma grade or QRS duration and cerebral spinal fluid concentration of amitriptyline was found. There was no correlation between any hydroxymetabolite in blood or cerebral spinal fluid and QRS duration or coma grade. The beta half-life for amitriptyline was shorter for two patients with high concentrations of hydroxymetabolites. Although intubated, neither patient required assisted ventilation or developed complications. Because of the wide range of concentrations of amitriptyline and amitriptyline metabolites observed between individuals, it is not possible to predict outcome based on a single tricyclic antidepressant concentration.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed1998

Acupuncture and amitriptyline for pain due to HIV-related peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS.

CONTEXT: Peripheral neuropathy is common in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but few data on symptomatic treatment are available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a standardized acupuncture regimen (SAR) and amitriptyline hydrochloride for the relief of pain due to HIV-related peripheral neuropathy in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Each site enrolled patients into 1 of the following 3 options: (1) a modified double-blind 2 x 2 factorial design of SAR, amitriptyline, or the combination compared with placebo, (2) a modified double-blind design of an SAR vs control points, or (3) a double-blind design of amitriptyline vs placebo. SETTING: Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (HIV primary care providers) in 10 US cities. PATIENTS: Patients with HIV-associated, symptomatic, lower-extremity peripheral neuropathy. Of 250 patients enrolled, 239 were in the acupuncture comparison (125 in the factorial option and 114 in the SAR option vs control points option), and 136 patients were in the amitriptyline comparison (125 in the factorial option and 11 in amitriptyline option vs placebo option). INTERVENTIONS: Standardized acupuncture regimen vs control points, amitriptyline (75 mg/d) vs placebo, or both for 14 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Changes in mean pain scores at 6 and 14 weeks, using a pain scale ranging from 0.0 (no pain) to 1.75 (extremely intense), recorded daily. RESULTS: Patients in all 4 groups showed reduction in mean pain scores at 6 and 14 weeks compared with baseline values. For both the acupuncture and amitriptyline comparisons, changes in pain score were not significantly different between the 2 groups. At 6 weeks, the estimated difference in pain reduction for patients in the SAR group compared with those in the control points group (a negative value indicates a greater reduction for the "active" treatment) was 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.11 to 0.12; P=.88) and for patients in the amitriptyline group vs those in the placebo group was -0.07 (95% CI, -0.22 to 0.08; P=.38). At 14 weeks, the difference for those in the SAR group compared with those in the control points group was -0.08 (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.06; P=.26) and for amitriptyline compared with placebo was 0.00 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.19; P=.99). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, neither acupuncture nor amitriptyline was more effective than placebo in relieving pain caused by HIV-related peripheral neuropathy.

Acupuncture Therapy↗
PubMed1998

Five distinct human cytochromes mediate amitriptyline N-demethylation in vitro: dominance of CYP 2C19 and 3A4.

The human cytochromes P450 (CYPs) mediating amitriptyline N-demethylation have been identified using a combination of enzyme kinetic and chemical inhibition studies. Amitriptyline was N-demethylated to nortriptyline by microsomes from cDNA transfected human lymphoblastoid cells expressing human CYPs 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4. CYP 2E1 showed no detectable activity. While CYP 2C19 and CYP 2D6 showed high affinity, CYP 3A4 showed low affinity; CYP 2C9 and 1A2 showed intermediate affinities. Based on these kinetic parameters and estimated relative abundance of the different CYPs in human liver, CYP 2C19 was identified as the major amitriptyline N-demethylase at low (therapeutically relevant) amitriptyline concentrations, whereas CYP 3A4 may be more important at higher amitriptyline concentrations. Chemical inhibition studies with ketoconazole and omeprazole indicate that CYP 3A4 is the major amitriptyline N-demethylase at 100 mumol/L amitriptyline, while CYP 2C19 is equally important at a substrate concentration of 5 mumol/L. The CYP 1A2 inhibitor alpha-naphthoflavone and the CYP 2C9 inhibitor sulfaphenazole produced much less inhibition of amitriptyline N-demethylation at both substrate concentrations. Quinidine produced no detectable inhibition. The kinetics of amitriptyline N-demethylation by human liver microsomes were consistent with a two enzyme model, with the high affinity component exhibiting Michaelis Menten kinetics and the low affinity component exhibiting Hill enzyme kinetics. No difference was apparent in the kinetics of amitriptyline N-demethylation in two liver samples with low levels of CYP 2C19 activity compared with two other samples with relatively normal 2C19 activity. This may reflect the importance of higher substrate concentration values in estimation of kinetic parameters in vitro.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2005

Acute and subchronic effects of amitriptyline on processing capacity in neuropathic pain patients using visual event-related potentials: preliminary findings.

RATIONALE: Little is known about the effects of low doses of amitriptyline, prescribed in the treatment of neuropathic pain, on attentional processing capacity. OBJECTIVES: Changes due to amitriptyline treatment on attentional processing capacity were investigated on behavioral measures and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in six patients with neuropathic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were treated for 15 consecutive days with 25 mg nocturnally administered amitriptyline or placebo in a double-blind crossover randomized design. Measurements were carried out on day 1 and day 15 of each treatment period. An attentional capacity probe task was used in which the difficulty level was manipulated, resulting in an easy and a hard condition, while task-irrelevant visual probes were presented. During task performance, ERPs were measured from the midline electrodes Fz, Cz, Pz, and Oz. RESULTS: Amitriptyline increased reaction times (RTs) after acute but not after subchronic administration. ERP analyses showed that P3 amplitudes to the task stimuli were not affected by amitriptyline in either treatment phase. Moreover, P3 amplitudes to the probes were increased in the easy compared to the hard task condition after subchronic amitriptyline treatment, indicating beneficial effects of repeated amitriptyline administration. In contrast, acute amitriptyline administration did reduce an earlier visual evoked potential, N1, preceding the P3 component. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that amitriptyline, even at low dosages of 25 mg, affects performance after acute administration in chronic neuropathic pain patients. After 2 weeks of treatment, performance appears to be unaffected. No deficits in processing capacity due to amitriptyline treatment were found.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Analgesic effect of amitriptyline in chronic tension-type headache is not directly related to serotonin reuptake inhibition.

The tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline is the only documented and most widely used prophylactic drug for chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). However, it is not fully clarified whether the serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibition plays a major role for the analgesic effect of amitriptyline. To explore the importance of 5-HT reuptake inhibition for mechanism of action of the analgesic effect of amitriptyline we investigated platelet 5-HT levels during preventive treatment of CTTH with amitriptyline, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram, and placebo. Thirty-four patients with CTTH were given preventive treatment with amitriptyline 75 mg/day, the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor citalopram 20 mg/day, and placebo in a 32-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover trial. Blood samples were collected in the last week of each treatment period. Platelet 5-HT was used as a measure of 5-HT reuptake inhibition and determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Area under the headache curve was 308 (157-715) (median with quartiles in parentheses) with amitriptyline and significantly lower than 377 (158-1121) with citalopram (P = 0.04) and 441 (178-1408) with placebo (P = 0.002). There was no difference between citalopram and placebo (P = 0.23). Platelet 5-HT was 0.4 (0.3-0.7) x 10(-18)mol/platelet with citalopram, which was significantly lower than 1.7 (1.2-2.4) x 10(-18)mol/platelet with amitriptyline (P < 0.001), and 3.5 (2.8-4.3) x 10(-18)mol/platelet with placebo (P < 0.001). The lower platelet 5-HT during treatment with citalopram than amitriptyline indicates that 5-HT reuptake was most effectively inhibited by citalopram. In contrast, amitriptyline was most effective in reduction of headache. This suggests that the analgesic effect of amitriptyline in CTTH is not solely due to 5-HT reuptake inhibition and that other mechanisms such as norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, NMDA receptor antagonism, blockade of muscarinic receptors and ion channels should be addressed in the future research.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Chronic administration of amitriptyline and caffeine in a rat model of neuropathic pain: multiple interactions.

This study was designed to determine (1) whether chronic amitriptyline administration was effective in alleviating symptoms of neuropathic pain in a rat model of spinal nerve injury, and (2) whether the effect of amitriptyline involved manipulation of endogenous adenosine, by determining the effect of caffeine, a non-selective adenosine A(1) and A(2) receptor antagonist, on its actions. Nerve injury was produced by unilateral spinal nerve ligation of the fifth and sixth lumbar nerves distal to the dorsal root ganglion, and this resulted in stimulus-evoked thermal hyperalgesia and static tactile mechanical allodynia. Animals received pre- and post-surgical intraperitoneal doses of amitriptyline (10 mg/kg) and caffeine (7.5 mg/kg), alone or in combination, and following surgery, were administered amitriptyline (15-18 mg/kg/day) and caffeine (6-8 mg/kg/day), alone or in combination, in the drinking water. Rats were tested for thermal reaction latencies and static tactile thresholds at 7, 14 and 21 days following surgery. In the paw ipsilateral to the nerve ligation, chronic amitriptyline administration consistently decreased the thermal hyperalgesia produced by spinal nerve ligation over a 3-week period, and this effect was blocked by concomitant caffeine administration at all time intervals. In the contralateral paw, thermal withdrawal latencies were more variable, with the most reproducible finding being a reduction in thermal thresholds in the amitriptyline-caffeine combination group. There was no effect by either drug or the drug combination on the static tactile allodynia produced by spinal nerve ligation in the ipsilateral paw. However, chronic amitriptyline administration induced a tactile hyperaesthesia in the contralateral paw at all time intervals, and this effect was exacerbated by concomitant chronic caffeine administration. The results of this study indicate that chronic administration of amitriptyline is effective in alleviating thermal hyperalgesia, but not static tactile allodynia, in the hindpaw ipsilateral to nerve injury, and the block of this effect by caffeine suggests that this effect is partially achieved through manipulation of endogenous adenosine systems. Additionally, chronic amitriptyline administration induces contralateral hyperaesthetic responses that are augmented by caffeine. Both the symptom-specific effect, and adenosine involvement in amitriptyline action may be important considerations governing its use in neuropathic pain.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2000

Blockade of the HERG human cardiac K(+) channel by the antidepressant drug amitriptyline.

1. Amitriptyline has been known to induce QT prolongation and torsades de pointes which causes sudden death. We studied the effects of amitriptyline on the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes and on the rapidly activating delayed rectifier K(+) current (I(Kr)) in rat atrial myocytes. 2. The amplitudes of steady-state currents and tail currents of HERG were decreased by amitriptyline dose-dependently. The decrease became more pronounced at more positive potential, suggesting that the block of HERG by amitriptyline is voltage dependent. IC(50) for amitriptyline block of HERG current was progressively decreased according to depolarization: IC(50) values at -30, -10, +10 and +30 mV were 23.0, 8.71, 5.96 and 4.66 microM, respectively. 3. Block of HERG by amitriptyline was use dependent: exhibiting a much faster block at higher activation frequency. Subsequent decrease in frequency after high activation frequency resulted in a partial relief of HERG blockade. 4. Steady-state block by amitriptyline was obtained while depolarization to +20 mV for 0.5 s was applied at 0.5 Hz: IC(50) was 3.26 microM in 2 mM [K(+)](o). It was increased to 4. 78 microM in 4 mM [K(+)](o), suggesting that the affinity of amitriptyline on HERG was decreased by external K(+). 5. In rat atrial myocytes bathed in 35 degrees C, 5 microM amitriptyline blocked I(Kr) by 55%. However, transient outward K(+) current (I(to)) was not significantly affected. 6. In summary, the data suggest that the block of HERG currents may contribute to arrhythmogenic side effects of amitriptyline.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2002

The effect of the nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor L-NAME on amitriptyline-induced hypotension in rats.

OBJECTIVE: Hypotension induced by tricyclic antidepressants is multifactorial. Previous animal experiments suggest a contribution from nitric oxide production. Our study aimed to evaluate the role of nitric oxide in amitriptyline-induced hypotension using N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, a nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor, and 3-morpholino sydnonimine, a nitric oxide donor, in anesthetized rats. METHODS: Amitriptyline intoxication was induced by the continuous infusion of amitriptyline 0.625 mg/kg/min throughout the experiment in anesthetized rats. Fifteen and 25 minutes after amitriptyline infusion began, two bolus doses of 10 mg/kg of N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (n = 8) or an equivalent volume of 5% dextrose solution (n = 8) was administered to each rat (Protocol 1). To investigate whether the effect of N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester on blood pressure is counteracted by 3-morpholino sydnonimine, after the same protocol of amitriptyline infusion and 5 minutes after an N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester bolus, a bolus of 3000 nmol/kg of 3-morpholino sydnonimine was administered (n = 8) to each rat (Protocol 2). To investigate the effect of N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester on 3-morpholino sydnonimine induced hypotension, a group of rats received a continuous infusion of 0.54 mg/kg/h of 3-morpholino sydnonimine until 50% reduction was observed in mean arterial blood pressure followed by a bolus dose of 10 mg/kg of N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (n = 6) or 5% dextrose solution (n = 6) (Protocol 3). Outcome measures included mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and QRS duration in electrocardiogram. Student's t test and survival analysis were used for selected comparisons. RESULTS: For all parameters, the treatment groups were similar at baseline and at postamitriptyline periods before therapy was rendered. Amitriptyline infusion significantly reduced mean arterial blood pressure by 50.8 +/- 2.2% and prolonged QRS by 23.9 +/- 7.2% after 15 minutes. In Protocol 1, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester significantly increased mean arterial blood pressure compared to dextrose-treated control animals within 30 minutes (77.9 +/- 8.5% vs. 49.7 +/- 5.0% mmHg, p < 0.01, 95% CI 57.1-98.7%). QRS duration progressively increased during the amitriptyline infusion; however, there was no significant difference in QRS width between N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and control groups at any time point. N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester increased survival time compared to controls (33.4 +/- 4.1 vs. 19.9 +/- 2.7 minutes, p < 0.01, 95% CI 25.4-41.3) but did not affect mortality. In Protocol 2 of continuous infusion of amitriptyline, 3-morpholino sydnonimine counteracted the N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester-induced increase in mean arterial blood pressure. In both protocols, heart rate decreased significantly during amitriptyline infusion but there was no difference between treatment and control groups. In Protocol 3, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester bolus reversed 3-morpholino sydnonimine-induced hypotension compared to dextrose bolus. (83.8 +/- 5.7% vs. 54.6 +/- 4.8%, p < 0.01, 95% CI 69.2-98.4). CONCLUSION: N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester is found to be effective in temporarily improving hypotension and prolonging survival time but does not affect overall mortality. Because this effect was antagonized by 3-morpholino sydnonimine, nitric oxide production appears to contribute to the pathophysiology of amitriptyline-induced hypotension.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed1995

Intrathecal amitriptyline acts as an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist in the presence of inflammatory hyperalgesia in rats.

BACKGROUND: Amitriptyline and other tricyclic antidepressants exhibit high affinity binding to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in vitro and inhibit NMDA receptor activation-induced neuroplasticity in hippocampal slices. Because spinal NMDA receptor activation is believed to be central to generation and maintenance of hyperalgesic pain, the purpose of this study was to test whether intrathecal amitriptyline reduced inflammation-induced hyperalgesia in the rat. METHODS: Rats were prepared with chronic lumbar intrathecal and femoral intravenous catheters and nociceptive threshold was assessed by hind paw withdrawal to a radiant heat stimulus. Rats received an injection of carrageenin in one hind paw followed by thermal paw withdrawal testing 3 hr later and intrathecal amitriptyline and/or intravenous morphine injection. In other rats, intrathecal NMDA injection was preceded by either intrathecal saline or 60 micrograms amitriptyline. RESULTS: Intrathecal amitriptyline reversed thermal hyperalgesia in a dose-dependent manner, but had no effect on withdrawal latency of the contralateral, noninjected paw. Intrathecal phentolamine plus methysergide did not alter amitriptyline's effect, except at the lowest dose. Intravenous morphine increased paw withdrawal latency in both inflamed and control paws in a dose-dependent fashion, and morphine interacted additively with intrathecal amitriptyline to reverse hyperalgesia. Thermal hyperalgesia induced by NMDA was completely antagonized by intrathecal amitriptyline. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline and other tricyclic antidepressants have been demonstrated to exhibit modest activity against clinical neuropathic pain after systemic administration. These data suggest that more profound pain relief might be obtained by intrathecal administration. Amitriptyline reverses hyperalgesia in rats by a mechanism unrelated to monoamine reuptake inhibition, and likely due to NMDA receptor antagonism.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cardioprotective effects of carbocromen in awake and anesthetized dogs with amitriptyline poisoning.

We studied the effects of the antianginal drug carbocromen (4 mg/kg bolus plus 80 micrograms/kg/min i.v.) on amitriptyline (400 micrograms/kg/min i.v.) toxicity. In anesthetized dogs, amitriptyline increased heart rate, left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure, and the PR and QT intervals, the QRS complex, and the S-T segments of the peripheral electrocardiogram. Blood pressure, LV pressure, and LV dP/dtmax fell considerably. Survival time was 37 +/- 4 min in amitriptyline-treated dogs and 64 +/- 3 min (p less than 0.05) in those receiving amitriptyline plus carbocromen. The amount of amitriptyline consumed until death increased from 14.8 to 25.6 mg/kg (p less than 0.05) with carbocromen. In conscious dogs, the hemodynamic impact of intraatrial amitriptyline was similar to that in anesthetized animals, and changes in stroke volume resembled those of dP/dt. Cardiac output was not altered, and peripheral resistance decreased moderately. Carbocromen prevented most of the typical amitriptyline effects on the heart and circulation. Sustained ventricular arrhythmia occurred at 29 +/- 4 min with amitriptyline infusion but was delayed to 58 +/- 3 min (p less than 0.05) when carbocromen was added. These experiments demonstrate (a) amitriptyline intoxication produced ventricular tachyarrhythmia and cardiac failure if high agent concentrations were achieved; (b) these rhythm disorders were associated with slowing of intraventricular conduction, which could be enhanced by carbocromen; and (c) carbocromen might be an effective therapy for amitriptyline-caused arrhythmia with cardiovascular collapse.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2004

A prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study of amitriptyline for the treatment of interstitial cystitis.

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective study to examine the safety and efficacy of the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline in patients with interstitial cystitis (IC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 44 women and 6 men who all met the symptom criteria of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases for IC. The patients were randomly assigned to amitriptyline or placebo. Patients were prospectively treated for 4 months with a self-titration protocol that allowed them to escalate drug dosage in 25 mg increments in 1 week-intervals (maximum dosage 100 mg). The change from baseline in the O'Leary-Sant IC symptom and problem index was the primary outcome parameter. Changes in functional bladder capacity and frequency (48-hour voiding log), and intensity of pain and urgency (visual analog scales) were chosen as secondary outcome parameters. RESULTS: Two patients (1 on amitriptyline, 1 on placebo) dropped out of the study due to side effects. Thus, the data of 48 patients (24 patients in each group) were available for evaluation. Mean symptom score decreased from 26.9 to 18.5 in the amitriptyline group compared with 27.6 to 24.1 in the placebo group (p = 0.005). Pain and urgency intensity improved statistically significantly in the amitriptyline group compared with the placebo group (p <0.001). The frequency and functional bladder capacity improved to a much greater degree in the amitriptyline group but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.063, p = 0.083). Anticholinergic side effects were reported by all except 2 patients in the amitriptyline group (92%) and by 5 patients in the placebo group (21%). Mouth dryness was the most frequent side effect reported in the amitriptyline group (79%). CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline therapy for 4 months is safe and effective for treating IC. A statistically significant change in the symptom score and statistically significant improvement of pain and urgency intensity compared with placebo were observed. Anticholinergic side effects constitute the major drawback of amitriptyline treatment for IC.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Enhancement of cyclic AMP accumulation mediated by 5-HT after chronic amitriptyline treatment in NG 108-15 cells.

1. The effects of chronic in vitro administration of amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, on 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase activity was studied in the neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cell line, NG 108-15. 2. Treatment of NG 108-15 cells with 8 microM amitriptyline for 3 days increased forskolin-stimulated (0.1 microM) adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) accumulation. Addition of 5-HT (0.1-100 microM) increased forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in amitriptyline-treated cells in a concentration-dependent manner. However, 5-HT did not affect forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in untreated cells. 3. The 5-HT4 receptor agonist, 5-methoxytryptamine, significantly enhanced forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in amitriptyline-treated cells. In contrast, amitriptyline treatment failed to modify 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamine) tetralin-induced inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation. 4. Pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin did not affect the 5-HT-induced enhancement of cyclic AMP accumulation. 5. The 5-HT-induced enhancement of cyclic AMP accumulation in amitriptyline-treated cells was attenuated by the 5-HT4 receptor antagonists, GR 113808 and ICS 205-930, with relatively low potency. However, spiperone, SCH 23390, and pindolol were completely ineffective against this 5-HT-induced enhancement. 6. Chronic treatment with amitriptyline did not modify the cyclic AMP production stimulated by prostaglandin E1 or cholera toxin. This treatment also had no effect on GTP gamma S-, NaF-, and Mn(2+)-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in isolated cell membranes. 7. Chronic treatment with the 5-HT receptor antagonists, pindolol or ICS 205-930, did not inhibit the 5-HT-induced enhancement of cyclic AMP accumulation.8. Chronic treatment with other antidepressant drugs, imipramine, mianserin or paroxetine, elicited the 5-HT-induced enhancement of cyclic AMP accumulation.9. Taken together, these results suggest that chronic amitriptyline treatment of NG 108-15 cells causes 5-HT to enhance forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation by enhancing 5-HT receptor-mediated stimulation of adenylyl cyclase and not by reducing 5-HT-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. The 5-HT-induced enhancement of cyclic AMP accumulation in amitriptyline-treated cells may result from changes at the level of the 5-HT receptor rather than at the level of G, proteins or adenylyl cyclase. It is unlikely that this enhancement of cyclic AMP accumulation is caused by long-term antagonism of the 5-HT receptor by amitriptyline.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2006

Acute amitriptyline intoxication: an analysis of 44 children.

The tricyclic antidepressant agents, particularly amitriptyline and dothiepin, are recognized for their potentially lethal cardiovascular and neurological effects in poisoned patients. In this article, the clinical and laboratory findings of 44 children with amitriptyline intoxication are reviewed. Our purpose was to investigate amitriptyline intoxication in childhood. Of 44 patients, 21 (47.7%) were boys, 23 (52.3%) were girls, and the ages ranged from 12 months to 14 years (mean +/- SD; 4.09 +/- 2.9 years). All children except one who took an overdose of amitriptyline to decrease his pain accidentally ingested an overdose of amitriptyline. The amount of amitriptyline ingested was between 2 mg/kg and 97.5 mg/kg (mean +/- SD; 13.6 +/- 17.7 mg/kg per dose) (the drug dosage was not known in 13 children). The most commonly observed clinical and laboratory findings were lethargy, tachycardia, convulsion, hyperglycemia and leukocytosis. In all patients except for two children who died the abnormal clinical and laboratory findings returned to normal within a few days after admission and they were discharged from the hospital in good health within the fourth day of admission. One of the children ingested 97.5 mg/kg amitriptyline and probably died due to status epilepticus and another child who died ingested 36 mg/ kg amitriptyline and died due to cardiopulmonary arrest. In conclusion, our findings showed that initial symptoms and signs of acute amitriptyline intoxication appeared severe, but they disappeared with only supportive care required in most children except for cases that ingested high doses of drug within a few days. In contrast to adults, we infrequently noted respiratory insufficiency, arrhythmia and hypotension in children with acute amitriptyline intoxication.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Low dose amitriptyline in ankylosing spondylitis: a short term, double blind, placebo controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To define the effect of low dose amitriptyline on fatigue, pain, and stiffness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with AS were randomized to receive low dose amitriptyline up to 30 mg nightly or placebo for 2 weeks. Patients were assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (BASDAI) and Functional (BASFI) Indices pre and post-treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (44 amitriptyline, 44 placebo) completed the study. Eight (5 amitriptyline, 3 placebo) stopped treatment because of side effects (e.g., drowsiness, dryness of mouth) and 4 provided insufficient data. Compared to placebo, the patients taking amitriptyline showed significantly greater improvement in restful sleep (66 vs 20%; p < 0.001) and their disease activity scores [BASDAI amitriptyline 1.18 (23%) vs placebo 0.52 (10%); p = 0.024]. All other variables showed a trend to greater improvement by amitriptyline, although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: (1) In a 2 week study, low dose amitriptyline significantly improved sleep in AS and was well tolerated; (2) as defined by BASDAI, there was a significant reduction in disease activity with amitriptyline; (3) compared to placebo, there was a nonsignificant trend toward improvement in function; and (4) in spite of improvement in pain, fatigue, and sleep with amitriptyline, stiffness was not increased.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with amitriptyline on diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain.

BACKGROUND: Reports of gabapentin use in diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain stimulate a need for controlled trials to determine its comparative efficacy to the therapeutic standard of amitriptyline hydrochloride. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of gabapentin compared with amitriptyline in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. SETTING: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Ambulatory Care Clinic. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight veterans were referred by their primary care providers. Two patients withdrew before randomization because of no neuropathic pain after washout; a third withdrew for unexpected surgery that required analgesics. Three patients withdrew because of adverse effects and 1 for protocol violation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with stable glycemic control and neuropathic pain randomized to 6 weeks of therapy with gabapentin, 900 to 1800 mg/d, or amitriptyline hydrochloride, 25 to 75 mg/d, with a 1-week washout before crossover. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain relief measured by pain scale with verbal descriptors and global pain score assessment at treatment end. RESULTS: Participants and investigators were blinded throughout. Mean dosages were of gabapentin, 1565 mg/d, and of amitriptyline hydrochloride, 59 mg/d. Sixty-five percent of patients reached maximum dose with gabapentin and 54% with amitriptyline. Mean score diary analysis showed pain relief with gabapentin and amitriptyline was not significantly different (P = .26). Global data were obtained from 21 of 25 enrolled patients who completed the study. Moderate or greater pain relief was experienced in 11 (52%) of 21 patients with gabapentin and 14 (67%) of 21 patients with amitriptyline. There were no significant period or carry-over effects (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Although both drugs provide pain relief, mean pain score and global pain score data indicate no significant difference between gabapentin and amitriptyline. Gabapentin may be an alternative for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain, yet does not appear to offer considerable advantage over amitriptyline and is more expensive. Larger trials are necessary to define gabapentin's place in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain.

Acetates↗
PubMed2005

Chronic pelvic pain treated with gabapentin and amitriptyline: a randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of gabapentin, amitriptyline, and their combination in women with chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: In this open-label, prospective, randomized trial, 56 women with chronic pelvic pain were investigated with a two-year follow-up at the Vienna Medical University Hospital. If pain intensity assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) was 5 or more (0, no pain; 10, maximal pain), despite analgesic therapy using the nonopioid drug metamizol together with weak opioids, patients were randomized to receive gabapentin (n = 20), amitriptyline (n = 20), or a combination of both drugs (n = 16). Doses of gabapentin and amitriptyline were increased to maximum daily doses of 3600 mg and 150 mg, respectively, until sufficient pain relief or the occurrence of side effects. VAS and side effects were evaluated before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months afterwards. RESULTS: All patients experienced significant pain relief during the observation period. However, after 6, 12 and 24 months, pain relief was significantly better in patients receiving gabapentin either alone or in combination with amitriptyline than in patients receiving monotherapy with amitriptyline (gabapentin: 0 months, 7.7 +/- 1.5; 6 months, 1.6 +/- 0.9; 12 months, 1.5 +/- 0.9; 24 months, 1.9 +/- 0.9; amitriptyline: 0 months, 7.3 +/- 1.5; 6 months, 2.2 +/- 1.6; 12 months, 2.2 +/- 1.6; 24 months; 3.4 +/- 0.9; amitriptyline-gabapentin: 0 months, 7.6 +/- 0.8; 6 months, 1.3 +/- 0.9; 12 months, 1.7 +/- 1.0; 24 months, 2.3 +/- 0.9). Side effects were lower in the gabapentin group than in the two other groups, the difference reaching statistical significance after three months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Gabapentin alone or in combination with amitriptyline is better than amitriptyline alone in the treatment of female chronic pelvic pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Amitriptyline enhances extracellular tissue levels of adenosine in the rat hindpaw and inhibits adenosine uptake.

Local administration of amitriptyline into the rat hindpaw produces peripheral antinociception; this is reduced by adenosine receptor antagonists and appears to involve endogenous adenosine. The present study used peripheral microdialysis: (a) to determine whether amitriptyline could enhance extracellular tissue levels of endogenous adenosine in the rat hindpaw and (b) to examine mechanisms by which such an increase could occur. Local injection of amitriptyline into the plantar hindpaw, at doses that produce peripheral antinociception (100-300 nmol), produced an increase in local extracellular levels of adenosine. When injected in combination with formalin, which also enhances such levels of adenosine, an additive increase was observed. This adenosine originated partly as nucleotide, as inhibition of ecto-5'-nucleotidase reduced the amount of adenosine detected in the probe following administration of amitriptyline. When administered in combination with exogenous adenosine, amitriptyline augmented recovery of adenosine in the probe. Pretreatment of rats with capsaicin augmented the ability of amitriptyline to increase adenosine levels detected in the dialysis probe; it also enhanced tissue recovery of exogenously administered adenosine. In uptake studies using cultured rat C6 glioma cells, amitriptyline inhibited adenosine uptake by an adenosine transporter (IC50 0.37 +/- 0.12 mM). In enzyme assays, amitriptyline had no effect on adenosine kinase or adenosine deaminase activity. These results demonstrate that amitriptyline: (a) enhances extracellular tissue levels of adenosine in the rat hindpaw following local administration in vivo and (b) inhibits adenosine uptake but has no effect on metabolism in vitro. Therefore, increased extracellular adenosine levels in vivo appear to result partially from extracellular conversion of nucleotide and partially from inhibition of uptake.

Adenosine↗