Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Resource Allocation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources

Death certification in fractured neck of femur.

Fracture of the neck of the femur is a major public health problem within the elderly population of most industrialised countries whose health services are increasingly being taken up with its management. Moreover, within Britain, there is evidence of a real increase in its incidence even allowing for the ageing of the population. A condition whose aetiology is still far from clear (and where no strategy for prevention can therefore be formulated), and which is of such importance to the planning and provision of services demands detailed investigation and careful monitoring. Mortality data are an important part of epidemiological studies of disease problems and, in Britain, in resource allocation through the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) formula. In this study, a cohort of 2,631 elderly patients, resident in the largest health district in the country, and admitted to hospitals over a seven year period with the diagnosis of fractured neck of femur, was assembled. Hospital records were linked to national mortality data to determine whether patients had died and, where this was so, to record underlying cause of death. A total of 930 deaths occurred within the study cohort but only 52 were certified as dying from fractured neck of femur; even amongst those who died in the hospital to which they were admitted with the fracture, less than a fifth of deaths were attributed to the fracture as underlying cause. Diseases of the circulatory system accounted for almost half of all underlying causes of death and bronchopneumonia a further 20%. These findings suggest a gross undercertification of fractured neck of femur as a cause of death in the elderly and are consistent with other studies. They may be explained by a failure of junior hospital doctors to understand the importance of accurate certification of cause of death and a misguided attempt to reduce the burden to coroners of having to consider each death from this cause.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

The role of institutional arrangements for more efficient water resources use and allocation.

Water resources management requires an interdisciplinary approach to meet the challenges posed by ever increasing water demand and pollution. This paper discusses in which way appropriate institutional arrangements are complementary to technical interventions that aim to increase more efficient water use and allocation. Specific emphasis is given to water property rights as one of the determining factors in regard to the institutional framework. Issues such as the range of flexibility in designing property rights to water, the implications for pricing, enforcement and sanctioning mechanisms as well as for water trading and information needs are highlighted.

Efficiency↗

Physicians at the bedside: practitioners' thoughts and actions regarding bedside allocation of resources.

In the past, the study of the allocation of scarce medical resources centered around high-technology forms of health care such as the artificial heart, haemodialysis, etcetera. A major controversy considered in this study concerns the use of non-biomedical criteria (i.e., whether the social worth or financial status of a particular patient should dictate preferential medical treatment over another patient in times of shortage) in the allocation decision-making process. This article suggests that the study of allocation need not only focus on the dramatic realm of the high-tech, but should also concern itself with less dramatic everyday situations. Decisions concerning treatment based upon social worth and financial status are made almost daily by most practitioners; a thorough awareness of this phenomenon is prerequisite to the proper practice of medicine. Interviews with physicians disclose that most of these everyday allocation decisions are made tacitly, with non-biomedical criteria playing a role even in decisions that appear to have been prompted only by benign (even-guided) intentions.

Ethics, Medical↗

[Allocation of resources and restrictive standards in hospitals in the face of economic and personnel shortages].

The allocation of financial resources between both hospitals and the departments within a single hospital follows historically grown structures. Concepts on the basis of well-established factors for the systematic allocation of resources are rarely if ever used. Systematic approaches are needed, especially in times of decreasing resources, but they have to be grounded in a detailed understanding of both the customers and the products offered. The application of standards is a vital factor in order to simultaneously enhance operational efficiency and strategic effectiveness.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Allocating medical resources in rural America: alternative perceptions of justice.

In national debates concerning the allocation of medical resources rural America is a neglected topic, and the voices of rural health professionals are seldom heard. This paper highlights the special problems encountered in allocating medical resources within the rural setting and indicates the strategies that rural residents compose for dealing with them. Our findings are based on a study consisting of in-depth open-ended interviews with family physicians in the rural northwest United States. We contrast the approach to justice expressed by these rural physicians with the conception of justice that dominates Western philosophy and bioethics. In the course of our discussion, the diversity within Western culture becomes apparent. We discuss strategies for incorporating different perspectives into local and national allocation debates, clarify the reasons why a more encompassing approach to justice is necessary, and review the implications of our work for future research.

Beneficence↗

Reducing avoidable inequalities in health: a new criterion for setting health care capitation payments.

Traditionally, most health care systems which pretend to any sort of rationality and cost control have sought to allocate their limited funds in order to secure equal opportunity of access for equal need. The UK government is implementing a fundamental change of resource allocation philosophy towards 'contributing to the reduction of avoidable health inequalities'. The purpose of this essay is to explore some of the economic issues that arise when seeking to allocate health care resources according to the new criterion. It indicates that health inequalities might arise because of variations in the quality of health services, variations in access to those services, or variations in the way people produce health, and that the resource allocation consequences differ depending on which source is being addressed. The paper shows that an objective of reducing health inequalities is not necessarily compatible with an objective of equity of access, nor with the objective of maximising health gain. The results have profound consequences for approaches towards economic evaluation, the role of clinical guidelines and performance management, as well as for resource allocation methods.

Capitation Fee↗

US neurologists: attitudes on rationing.

OBJECTIVE: To assess neurologists' attitudes on rationing health care and to determine whether neurologists would set healthcare priorities in ways that are consistent with cost-effectiveness research. BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness research can suggest ways to maximize health benefits within fixed budgets but is currently being underused in resource allocation decisions. METHODS: The authors surveyed a random sample of neurologists practicing in the United States (response rate, 44.4%) with three hypothetical scenarios. Two scenarios were designed to address general attitudes on allocating finite resources with emphasis on formulary decisions for costly drugs. The third scenario was designed to assess whether neurologists would optimize the allocation of a fixed budget as recommended by cost-effectiveness analysis. RESULTS: Three-quarters of respondents thought that neurologists make daily decisions that effectively ration healthcare resources, and 60% felt a professional responsibility to consider the financial impact of individualized treatment decisions on other patients. Only 25% of respondents thought that there should be no restrictions placed on any of the five newer antiepileptic agents. In a 1995 survey, 75% of similarly sampled neurologists agreed that no restrictions should be placed on the availability of FDA-approved medications. Nearly half (46%) of respondents favored a less effective test and would be willing to let patients die to ensure the offering of a more equitable alternative. CONCLUSIONS: Most neurologists recognize the need to ration health care, and although they think cost-effectiveness research is one method to achieve efficient distribution of resources, many think that considerable attention should also be given to equity.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Preferences of the public regarding cutbacks in expenditure for patient care: are there indications of discrimination against those with mental disorders?

BACKGROUND: Increasing costs for patient care may necessitate financial cuts in the health-care budget. Our aim is to examine whether the public prefers cuts for psychiatric rather than medical conditions and how resource allocation preferences are related to illness beliefs and attitudes. METHOD: A telephone survey involving German adult population was conducted in 2004 (n = 1012). Participants were presented with a list of nine medical and mental diseases including alcoholism, depression, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, cancer, diabetes, rheumatism and AIDS, and were asked to name three conditions where they would prefer to see health-care resources cut. For all conditions we asked about personal attitudes and illness beliefs. RESULTS: People were more willing to have financial resources cut for psychiatric than for medical conditions, with resources for alcoholism having the least public backing. Alzheimer's disease was rated more favourably compared to other mental disorders. Generally, the perception of the severity of a disease was associated with resource allocation decisions, favouring those conditions that were considered to be severe. Mental diseases evoked a far greater desire for social distance than most medical diseases which had considerable influence on resource allocation preferences. The perception of personal responsibility had, in contrast, only limited effect on resource allocation decisions. It varied considerably in the case of psychiatric conditions but was not fundamentally different among medical and mental diseases. Personal susceptibility, treatment effectiveness and the perceived life-threat posed by a disease also had limited effects. CONCLUSION: According to public resource allocation preferences psychiatric patients are at risk of being structurally discriminated within the health-care system.

Adolescent↗

Small area variation in the utilization of mental health services: implications for health planning and allocation of resources.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the variables associated with utilization of mental health services and to develop a planning model to predict service utilization that incorporates these factors. METHOD: A regression analysis of service utilization and demographic characteristics was used to assess the relative importance of alternative service, supply of psychiatrists and demographics in explaining variations of services use. A model using socioeconomic factors was applied to the population to predict need. RESULTS: The percentage of divorced males was the only factor significantly and positively correlated with the utilization of hospital inpatient and provincial psychiatric beds. Predicted need exceeds utilization in 7 out of 10 areas for all services. CONCLUSIONS: Small area variations in inpatient psychiatric utilization is correlated with community characteristics, not supply of psychiatrists or utilization of alternative services. A model has been developed using census data to allocate resources according to need.

Adult↗

Allocating scarce resources in a publicly funded health system: ethical considerations of a Canadian managed care proposal.

In the Canadian health care system, the Government is responsible for allocating scarce resources in a fair and equitable manner. A proposal to implement managed care as a method of reimbursing physicians in Alberta, Canada, needs careful ethical consideration, because physicians are not well prepared, and should not be asked, to make the resulting difficult allocation decisions. The Government must continue to be held responsible for ensuring that all citizens have equal access to necessary medical services, and we must find ways to encourage the public to become more involved in deciding how resources are best allocated. Health professionals other than physicians must take an interest and enter into this debate.

Alberta↗

Estimating mean hospital cost as a function of length of stay and patient characteristics.

Statistical models have been used to assess the influence of clinical and demographic factors on hospital charge and length of stay (LOS). Hospital costs constitute a significant proportion of overall expenditure in health care. With escalating costs, knowing the correlates of LOS and in-hospital cost is important for decisions on allocating resources. However, hospital charge and LOS are correlated. We describe two regression models that permit estimation of mean charges as a function of patient hospital stay and adjust for the influence of patient characteristics and treatment procedures on LOS and charge. In the first model, the mean charge over a specified duration is a weighted average of the expected cumulative charge, with weighting determined by the distribution of LOS. The second model for LOS and charge explicitly accounts for their correlation and yields estimates of the average charge per average LOS. The methods are applied to assess mean charges and mean charge per day by cardiac procedure in a cohort of patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, while adjusting for the impact of patient demographic and clinical factors on LOS and charge. For relatively short hospital stays, and when only total hospital charges are available, these models provide a flexible approach to estimating summary measures on resource use while controlling for the effects of covariates on LOS and charge.

Aged↗

The Sisyphus syndrome in health revisited.

Health care may be similar to Sisyphus work: When the task is about to be completed, work has to start all over again. To see the analogy, consider an initial decision to allocate more resources to health. The likely consequence is an increased number of survivors, who will exert additional demand for health care. With more resources allocated to health, the cycle starts over again. The objective of this paper is to improve on earlier research that failed to find evidence of a Sisyphus syndrome in industrialized countries. This time, there are signs of such a cycle, which however seems to have faded away recently.

Delivery of Health Care↗

Neuroelectric and behavioral indices of interference control during acute cycling.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of in-task, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on neuroelectric and behavioral indices of interference control, one component of executive control. METHODS: Forty-one participants completed a V O(2) max test to determine maximal heart rate (HR). On a separate day, event-related brain potentials and task performance were measured during the counterbalanced conditions of upright cycling at 60% of maximal HR and rest while performing congruent and incongruent trials of a flanker task. RESULTS: Exercise resulted in reduced response accuracy for incongruent trials relative to rest; an effect not found for congruent trials. Decreased N1 amplitude was observed during exercise at parietal sites and globally for N2. Exercise also resulted in increased amplitude for the P2 at frontal and central sites, and for the P3 at frontal and lateral sites. Further, longer N2 and P3 latencies were observed during exercise relative to rest. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the need to allocate attentional resources toward the large-scale bodily movements inherent in exercise may relate to inefficiency of neural resource allocation, resulting in decreased interference control. SIGNIFICANCE: These data indicate general and selective exercise-induced decrements in cognitive processing while performing acute aerobic exercise.

Adult↗

Trauma fatalities: time and location of hospital deaths.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the epidemiology, temporal distribution, and place of traumatic hospital deaths can be a useful tool in identifying areas for research, education, and allocation of resources. STUDY DESIGN: Trauma registry-based study of all traumatic hospital deaths at a Level I urban trauma center during the period 1993 to 2002. The time and hospital location where deaths occurred were analyzed according to mechanism of injury, age, Glasgow Coma Score, and body areas with severe injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] >/= 4). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with death at various times after admission. RESULTS: During the study period there were 2,648 hospital trauma deaths. The most common body area with critical injuries (AIS >/= 4) was the head (43%), followed by the chest (28%) and the abdomen (19%). Overall, 37% of victims had no vital signs present on admission. Chest AIS >/= 4, penetrating trauma, and age greater than 60 years were significant risk factors associated with no vital signs on admission. Patients with severe chest trauma (AIS >/= 4) reaching the hospital alive were significantly more likely to die within the first 60 minutes than were patients with severe abdominal or head injuries (17% versus 11% versus 7%). In patients reaching the hospital alive, the time and place of death varied according to mechanism of injury and injured body area. Deaths caused by severe head trauma peaked at 6 to 24 hours, and deaths caused by severe chest or abdominal trauma peaked at 1 to 6 hours after admission. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal distribution and location of trauma deaths are influenced by the mechanism of injury, age, and the injured body area. These findings may help in focusing research, education, and resource allocation in a more targeted manner to reduce trauma deaths.

Abdominal Injuries↗

Portfolio evaluation of health programs: a reply to Sendi et al.

Sendi et al. (Soc. Sci. Med. 57 (2003) 2207) extend previous research on cost-effectiveness analysis to the evaluation of a portfolio of interventions with risky outcomes using a "second best" approach that can identify improvements in efficiency in the allocation of resources. This method, however, cannot be used to directly identify the optimal solution to the resource allocation problem. Theoretically, a stricter adherence to the foundations of portfolio theory would permit direct optimization in portfolio selection, however, when we include uncertainty in our analysis in addition to the traditional concept of risk (which is often mislabelled uncertainty) complexities are introduced that create significant hurdles in the development of practical applications of portfolio theory for health care policy decision making.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Medical economic considerations of supportive cancer care.

In an era of increasing cost containment in health care, it has become extremely important to allocate resources as efficiently as possible. This implies that formal health economic considerations are taken into account. One of increasing importance is the field of economic appraisal, which allows to quantify the value for money of medical interventions. This research is extremely useful in the field of supportive care of cancer patients. Economic considerations, social, political and ethical issues will also have to be addressed. The sum of these activities will enable us to make better choices in health care and ensure that sufficient resources are allocated to supportive cancer treatment. Cancer patients have physical, social, spiritual and emotional needs. They may suffer from severe physical symptoms, from social isolation, spiritual abandonment, and emotions such as sadness and anxiety, or feelings of deception, helplessness, anger and guilt. In some of them, the disease is rapidly progressing and ultimately they die. Their demanding care evokes intense feelings in health care providers, all the more since these incurable patients represent a challenge, which could be condensed under the heading "the challenge of medical omnipotence". The complexity of the matter, the interdisciplinary approach and the emergence of an increasingly cost conscience health care environment put supportive cancer care in a difficult realm.

Health Care Costs↗

Is it feasible or desirable to measure burdens of disease as a single number?

This paper questions the feasibility and desirability of creating a composite health index, such as the DALY (disability adjusted life years), that aggregates information about both mortality and morbidity into one number, to represent the burden of disease. Despite the expressed intention not to include contextual factors in the description of health states, in practice, doing so is unavoidable when trying to construct a health indicator. Including contextual factors leads to severe problems, however, regarding validity and reliability, and these are increased when evaluations of the described health states are made. This renders little confidence in DALYs as a measurement of the burden of disease. Using cost-effectiveness analyses and DALYs as tools in priority setting might have unwanted consequences, and this is not the only method of achieving economic efficiency. The use of this method might also serve to relieve politicians of the responsibility for resource allocation in the health sector. An alternative to a composite index is better and more comprehensive epidemiological data on sexual and reproductive health mortality, morbidity and diseases rather than the better use of health indicators of questionable validity and reliability. These kinds of data are now being collected in connection with the Global Burden of Disease Project. It should be up to the decisions-makers to allocate existing resources based on a balancing of the many good purposes and goals available.

Cost of Illness↗

The once and future application of cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is used by payers to make coverage decisions, by providers to make formulary decisions, and by large purchasers/employers and policymakers to choose health care performance measures. However, it continues to be poorly utilized in the marketplace because of overriding financial imperatives to control costs and a low apparent willingness to pay for quality. There is no obvious relationship between the cost-effectiveness of life-saving interventions and their application. Health care decision makers consider financial impact, safety, and effectiveness before cost-effectiveness. WHY IS CEA NOT MORE WIDELY APPLIED? Most health care providers have a short-term parochial financial perspective, whereas CEA takes a long-term view that captures all costs, benefits, and hazards, regardless of to whom they accrue. In addition, a history of poor standardization of methods, unrealistic expectations that CEA could answer fundamental ethical and political issues, and society's failure to accept the need for allocating scarce resources more judiciously, have contributed to relatively little use of the method by decision makers. HOW WILL CEA FIND GREATER UTILITY IN THE FUTURE? As decision makers take a longer-term view and understand that CEA can provide a quantitative perspective on important resource allocation decisions, including the distributional consequences of alternative choices, CEA is likely to find greater use. However, it must be embedded within a framework that promotes confidence in the social justice of health care decision making through ongoing dialogue about how the value of health and health care are defined.

Attitude to Health↗