Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REINFORCEMENT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed1979

The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.

The correlation between a keylight and food in a discrete-trials, interresponse-time-greater-than 6-sec (IRT>6-sec) procedure was varied by manipulating the rate of response-independent food presentation in the intertrial interval. When the correlation was positive, the rates of pecking in the IRT>6-sec condition were high and food was obtained on only about 5% of the trials. Likewise, responding was maintained at a high rate in yoked birds that received the same presentations of the light and food as the birds in the IRT>6-sec condition. When the rate of reinforcement between trials was equated to or made greater than the rate of reinforcement within trials, the response rate decreased for all birds, and those decreases were considerably larger for the yoked birds. However, the percentage of trials in which reinforced responses occurred under the IRT>6-sec procedure did not increase substantially when the light and food were either uncorrelated or negatively correlated. The percentage of trials in which a reinforcer was obtained increased when the keylight was left on continuously and the discriminative stimulus was not presented on the key. The results show that the stimulus-reinforcer correlation affects responding in the discrete-trials IRT>6-sec procedure, but that the effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation vary as a function of whether reinforcement is response-dependent or response-independent. The differences between the effects of response-independent and response-dependent pairings and nonpairings of the light and food are best accounted for in terms of differences in the control of responding by background stimuli.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1980

Positive conditioned suppression: Transfer of performance between contingent and noncontingent reinforcement situations.

Five homing pigeons were trained on concurrent variable-interval schedules. A fixed-duration stimulus was occasionally presented on one key; and, in various conditions, this stimulus terminated (a) without reinforcement, (b) in noncontingent reinforcement, (c) with reinforcement contingent on a response on the key on which the stimulus was presented, and (d) with reinforcement contingent on a response on the key on which the stimulus was not presented. Initially, a stimulus terminating in noncontingent reinforcement generally produced decreased response rates on both keys during the stimulus. Contingencies, however, reliably produced increased rates during the stimulus on the key on which the contingency was arranged, relative to the rate on the concurrently available key. Contingency conditions were followed by noncontingency conditions in which the separation of rates caused by contingencies was maintained. When rates during the stimulus were compared with response rates on the same keys in the absence of the stimulus, contingency-caused rate increases and decreases were again found, but only the rate decreases were maintained in subsequent noncontingency conditions. Further data suggested that the contingency-caused rate changes were not maintained when the stimulus terminated without reinforcement, and that they were unaffected by a threefold decrease in the reinforcement rate provided by the baseline schedules. The results support the suggestion that performance in the positive conditioned suppression procedure results from concurrent and multiple schedule interactions. They further suggest that the production of either acceleration or suppression is dependent on adventitious and historical contingencies.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1980

A comparison of ratio and interval reinforcement schedules with comparable interreinforcement times.

Pigeons were trained to peck keys on fixed-ratio and fixed-interval schedules of food reinforcement. Both schedules produced a pattern of behavior characterized as pause and run, but the relation of pausing to time between reinforcers differed for the two schedules even when mean time between reinforcers was the same. Pausing in the fixed ratio occupied less of the time between reinforcers for shorter interreinforcer times. For two of three birds, the relation was reversed at longer interreinforcer times. As an interreinforcer time elapsed, there was an increasing tendency to return to responding for the fixed interval, but a roughly constant tendency to return to responding for the fixed-ratio schedule. In Experiment 1 these observations were made for both single-reinforcement schedules and multiple schedules of fixed-ratio and fixed-interval reinforcement. In Experiment 2 the observations were extended to a comparison of fixed-ratio versus variable-interval reinforcement schedules, where the distribution of interreinforcement times in the variable interval approximated that for the fixed ratio.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1984

Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure.

Two pigeons, with previous exposure to concurrent schedules, were submitted to 29 sessions of 8 hours each with concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules in which reinforcement parameters changed from session to session. In the first nine sessions reinforcement durations were equal in both schedules while reinforcement frequencies varied; in Sessions 10 through 18, both frequency and duration of reinforcement were varied; in Sessions 19 through 29, only reinforcement duration was varied. Results with this different procedure confirm previous findings that behavior is more sensitive to changes in reinforcement frequency than to reinforcement magnitude.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1988

Changes in functional response units with briefly delayed reinforcement.

In two experiments, key-peck responding of pigeons was compared under variable-interval schedules that arranged immediate reinforcement and ones that arranged unsignaled delays of reinforcement. Responses during the nominal unsignaled delay periods had no effect on the reinforcer presentations. In Experiment 1, the unsignaled delays were studied using variable-interval schedules as baselines. Relative to the immediate reinforcement condition, 0.5-s unsignaled delays decreased the duration of the reinforced interresponse times and increased the overall frequency of short (<0.5-s) interresponse times. Longer, 5.0-s unsignaled delays increased the duration of the reinforced interresponse times and decreased the overall frequency of the short interresponse times. In Experiment 2, similar effects to those of Experiment 1 were obtained when the 0.5-s unsignaled delays were imposed upon a baseline schedule that explicitly arranged reinforcement of short interresponse times and therefore already generated a large number of short interresponse times. The results support earlier suggestions that the unsignaled 0.5-s delays change the functional response unit from a single key peck to a multiple key-peck unit. These findings are discussed in terms of the mechanisms by which contingencies control response structure in the absence of specific structural requirements.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1988

Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model.

Six pigeons were trained in concurrent-chain schedules with equal aperiodic initial links and delays to reinforcers in the terminal links. The terminal links always lasted 30 s. In Experiment 1, two reinforcers were delivered in each terminal link, with the first reinforcer delivered either 1 s (Experiment 1A) or 5 s (Experiment 1B) after choice. In these experiments, the delay between the first and second reinforcers in one terminal link was 10 s, and the delay between the first and second reinforcers on the other key was varied. This variation produced little change in preference. In Experiment 1C, the first and second delays on one key were 10 s, and on the other key they were varied within the restriction that the sum of delays was 20 s. Preference for the varied terminal link increased as the first delay was decreased. A hyperbolic model of the value of reinforcer delay provided a good description of the data from Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, a single reinforcer was delivered in each terminal link after a delay of either 0.2 or 19.8 s, and these delays were reversed between conditions. The initial-link schedule providing terminal-link access was varied from means of 5 s to 480 s. As the initial-link duration was increased, preference for the shorter delay became less extreme. An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model, in which the decay constant was a hyperbolic function of the initial-link duration, described the results well. Differences between the procedure used here (constant-duration terminal links) and that used in conventional concurrent-chain research precludes use of the model as a general account of concurrent-chain performance.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1988

Effects of alternative reinforcement sources: A reevaluation.

The effects of two alternative sources of food delivery on the key-peck responding of pigeons were examined. Pecking was maintained by a variable-interval 3-min schedule. In the presence of this schedule in different conditions, either a variable-time 3-min schedule delivering food independently of responding or an equivalent schedule that required a minimum 2-s pause between a key peck and food delivery (a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior schedule) was added. The differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior schedule reduced response rates more than did the variable-time schedule in most instances. The delay between a key peck and the next reinforcer consistently was longer under the differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior schedule than under the variable-time schedule. Response rates and median delay between responses and reinforcers were negatively correlated. These results contradict earlier conclusions about the behavioral effects of alternative reinforcement. They suggest that an interpretation in terms of response-reinforcer contiguity is consistent with the data.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1991

Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates.

Four experiments examined the effects of increasing the number of food pellets given to hungry rats for a lever-press response. On a simple variable-interval 60-s schedule, increased number of pellets depressed response rates (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, the decrease in response rate as a function of increased reinforcement magnitude was demonstrated on a variable-interval 30-s schedule, but enhanced rates of response were obtained with the same increase in reinforcement magnitude on a variable-ratio 30 schedule. In Experiment 3, higher rates of responding were maintained by the component of a concurrent variable-interval 60-s variable-interval 60-s schedule associated with a higher reinforcement magnitude. In Experiment 4, higher rates of response were produced in the component of a multiple variable-interval 60-s variable-interval 60-s schedule associated with the higher reinforcement magnitude. It is suggested that on simple schedules greater reinforcer magnitudes shape the reinforced pattern of responding more effectively than do smaller reinforcement magnitudes. This effect is, however, overridden by another process, such a contrast, when two magnitudes are presented within a single session on two-component schedules.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1991

Substitutability between conditioned and primary reinforcers in discrimination acquisition.

Rats and pigeons were trained on a series of reversals of a conditional simultaneous discrimination. The percentage of reinforcement for correct trials was varied across reversals. When nonreinforced correct trials produced the same feedback as incorrect trials, the number of errors to reach an acquisition criterion was greater for smaller percentages of reinforcement, but the number of reinforcers required was either approximately constant or smaller for the smaller percentages. When a stimulus paired with food (the conditioned reinforcer) was added on nonreinforced correct trials, both measures were substantially decreased. When the same stimulus was presented, but without a history of food pairing, learning rate was similar to when no stimulus was presented on nonreinforced trials. The results provide direct evidence that conditioned reinforcers may substitute, although imperfectly, for a primary reinforcer, and that pairing with the primary reinforcer is a necessary condition for such substitutability to occur.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Behavior-dependent reinforcer-rate changes in concurrent schedules: A further analysis.

Six pigeons were trained on concurrent variable-interval schedules in three different procedures. The first procedure was a standard concurrent schedule, and the relative reinforcer frequency for responding was varied. The second was a schedule in which a relative left-key response rate (over a fixed period of time) exceeding .75 produced, in the next identical time period a higher reinforcer rate on the right key. If this criterion was not exceeded, equal reinforcer rates were arranged on the two keys in this period. This was the dependent procedure. In the third (independent) procedure, the periods of higher right-key reinforcer rates occurred with the same probability as in the second procedure, but occurred independently of behavior. In the second and third procedures, the fixed-time period (window) was varied from 5 s to 60 s, and to 240 s in the second procedure only. Performance on the two keys was similar in the concurrent and independent procedures. The procedure used in the dependent conditions generally affected performance when the windows were shorter than about 30 s. Models of performance that assume that subjects do not discriminate changes in local relative reinforcer rates cannot account for the data. Moreover, existing models are inherently unable to account for the effects of contingencies of reinforcement between responding on one alternative and gaining reinforcers on another that are arranged or that emerge as a result of time allocated to alternative schedules. Undermatching on concurrent variable-interval schedules may result from such emergent contingencies.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1993

Performances on ratio and interval schedules of reinforcement: Data and theory.

TWO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RATIO AND INTERVAL PERFORMANCE ARE WELL KNOWN: (a) Higher rates occur on ratio schedules, and (b) ratio schedules are unable to maintain responding at low rates of reinforcement (ratio "strain"). A third phenomenon, a downturn in response rate at the highest rates of reinforcement, is well documented for ratio schedules and is predicted for interval schedules. Pigeons were exposed to multiple variable-ratio variable-interval schedules in which the intervals generated in the variable-ratio component were programmed in the variable-interval component, thereby "yoking" or approximately matching reinforcement in the two components. The full range of ratio performances was studied, from strained to continuous reinforcement. In addition to the expected phenomena, a new phenomenon was observed: an upturn in variable-interval response rate in the midrange of rates of reinforcement that brought response rates on the two schedules to equality before the downturn at the highest rates of reinforcement. When the average response rate was corrected by eliminating pausing after reinforcement, the downturn in response rate vanished, leaving a strictly monotonic performance curve. This apparent functional independence of the postreinforcement pause and the qualitative shift in response implied by the upturn in variable-interval response rate suggest that theoretical accounts will require thinking of behavior as partitioned among at least three categories, and probably four: postreinforcement activity, other unprogrammed activity, ratio-typical operant behavior, and interval-typical operant behavior.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Color change in acrylic denture base resin reinforced with wire mesh and glass cloth.

In this study, the L*a*b* color system as a color system and light transmittance of the denture base resin reinforced with wire mesh and glass cloth were measured, and the color difference (deltaE*ab) was calculated using L*, a* and b* values which were measured both on a white calibration plate and on a null background. The thicknesses of test specimens, which were reinforced with wire mesh and glass cloth 0.5 and 1.0 mm below the surface, were 3 and 5 mm. L*, a* and b* values of wire mesh reinforcing specimens decreased in comparison with the non-reinforcing specimens (p<0.05). L* values of glass cloth-reinforcing specimens increased compared with the non-reinforcing specimens (p<0.05). The glass cloth is an effective reinforcing material and an aesthetically important property of denture base resin, since wire mesh makes the resin appear darker with the background condition greatly altering the color, while glass cloth makes the resin lighter.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2002

Rabbit muscle and urethral in situ biocompatibility properties of the self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer 80: 20 spiral stent.

PURPOSE: A new type of self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer, molar ratio 80:20, stent was developed. We evaluated the tissue biocompatibility properties of the new material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rods made of self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer were inserted into rabbit dorsal muscles and rods of latex or polyvinylchloride and silicone served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Urethral stents of self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer and steel were inserted in situ via cystoscopy into the rabbit prostatic urethra. The animals were sacrificed after 2 weeks, 1, 2 and 3 months, respectively. In situ histological analysis was done. Tissue reactions around the implantation types were analyzed histologically and scored semiquantitatively. In addition, macroscopic analysis was done of the urethral in situ stents. RESULTS: In rabbit muscle implantation test tissue reaction to the self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer stent resembled that of negative control silicone. Less than moderate chronic inflammatory changes gradually subsided after 2 weeks. Foreign materials in the tissue and the reaction to these materials began to disappear after 1 month and at 3 months were completely absent. All rabbits fitted with the stent voided normally postoperatively. Self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer stents were soft, partially fragmented and easily disintegrated when touched at 2 months, and were almost completely degraded at 3 months. The material did not encroach into the urethral wall macroscopically or microscopically. No calcification on the self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer stents or bladder stone formation was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The new self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid copolymer 80:20 material is safe, highly biocompatible and suited for future clinical use. It is most appropriate for preventing postoperative urinary retention after most minimally invasive thermal treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the residual monomer content of two denture base resins.

OBJECTIVE: The amount of residual monomer is one of the principal factors affecting the properties of acrylic resin denture bases. In recent years, glass fibers have been used to strengthen denture base resins. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the amount of residual methyl methacrylate released from two different denture base resins (heat cured and autopolymerized). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Continuous unidirectional and woven preimpregnated glass fiber reinforcements (Stick and Stick Net) were used to reinforce heat-curing and autopolymerizing denture base resins. RESULTS: The release of residual methyl methacrylate from heat-cured and autopolymerized test specimens reinforced with glass fibers was significantly higher than that from unreinforced test specimens. Stick Net glass fiber reinforcement resulted in significantly higher residual monomer release than did Stick glass fiber reinforcement. Test specimens made from heat-cured denture polymethyl methacrylate released less residual methyl methacrylate than did specimens made from autopolymerized polymethyl methacrylate. CONCLUSION: Glass fiber reinforcement increases the residual monomer content of denture base resins. The level of residual monomer ranged from 0.11% to 0.37% in heat-cured resin and from 0.18% to 0.46% in autopolymerized denture base resin.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2006

Reinforcement and sex linkage.

We present a general model for the effect of sex linkage on the evolution of reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. We find that the level of reinforcement can vary up to 80% depending on the mode of inheritance of the female preference and male trait. When reinforcement is driven mainly by selection in the male trait and intrinsic hybrid incompatibilities are weak, sex-linked preferences and autosomal male traits are the most conducive to reinforcement, whereas autosomal preferences and X-linked traits are the least. Surprisingly, the effect of mode of inheritance on reinforcement is poorly predicted by its effect on the genetic correlation between the male trait and female preference. Sex-linkage of genetic incompatibility loci increases reinforcement, though this is not due solely to the occurrence of Haldane's rule. We find that reinforcement can lead to complete reproductive isolation in some cases but not others and that the mode of inheritance can determine which outcome occurs.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Alcohol reinforcement and neuropharmacological therapeutics.

The pleasant subjective effects produced by alcohol undoubtedly reinforce drinking behaviour. Alcohol positively reinforces or rewards drinking by producing a mild euphoria. Alcohol also has anxiolytic effects that negatively reinforce drinking. The reinforcing effects of alcohol are mediated by several neurochemical systems, with dopamine and serotonin playing major roles in reward and the gamma-aminobutyric acid-benzodiazepine receptor system playing a major role in negative reinforcement. Research from our laboratory suggests that the behavioural effects of alcohol change when blood alcohol levels are changing and that these changes correspond to alterations of specific neurochemical systems. Behavioural activation and reward effects appear to occur as blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) increase. Depressive and aversive effects of alcohol occur during the period when BACs decrease. The observed correlation between behavioural and neuropharmacological changes and alcohol consumption suggest that alcohol produces a unique cascade over time that may provide clues to its long-sought specific mechanisms of action. In alcohol-dependent individuals, chronic exposure to alcohol may alter the function and communication between the liver, brain and other vital organ systems involved in hunger and the maintenance of nutrition. Under such conditions, the importance of alcohol in the diet may be enhanced such that hunger signals in the alcohol-dependent individual motivate the consumption of alcohol. Therefore, hunger for alcohol may provide an additional source of reinforcement. Endogenous opioid mechanisms may be important in this form of alcohol reinforcement.

Alcohol Deterrents↗
PubMed1996

Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement.

Under concurrent VI (conc VI) schedules of reinforcement, organisms match the proportion of responses to the proportion of reinforcers obtained from the available options. This result is the basis of the matching law, a major theoretical view of the control of choice between and among available reinforcers. The present experiment examined the extent to which i.v. cocaine self-administration by monkeys under conc VI schedules of reinforcement was predicted by the matching law. One group of rhesus monkeys (n = 4) was prepared with chronic indwelling i.v. catheters and allowed to respond in a two-lever situation under conc VI schedules of reinforcement for cocaine injections. Three doses of cocaine (0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg per injection) were made available under various conc VI schedules with an average inter-injection interval of 3 min. The same injection was available for each response, the difference between the options being the schedule of reinforcement. Each dose and schedule condition was in effect for at least ten consecutive sessions and until responding was stable. In a second group of monkeys (n = 3), a comparable experiment was conducted with responding maintained by the delivery of 1-g food pellets. Overall response rate maintained by cocaine was inversely related to dose. In addition, response rate decreased over the course of a session, apparently due to accumulation of cocaine. With regard to choice, more responding was maintained by the schedule that arranged more frequent injections. Choice was well predicted by the matching law, with a consistent tendency toward undermatching but no consistent bias toward one or the other option. Results were similar for behavior maintained by food, though two of three monkeys showed an unexplained bias toward the left lever. With regard to drug self-administration, these results demonstrate that in a choice situation, with all other variables being equal, injections that are available more frequently in time maintain behavior more strongly than less frequently available injections. Undermatching implies that the relative proportion of behavior maintained by the two options is somewhat less than the relative proportion of injections obtained. The finding that choice maintained by cocaine under conc VI schedules was comparable to choice maintained by food extends the generality of the conclusion that drugs and non-drug reinforcers control behavior by similar mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

The effects of verbal and nonverbal contingent reinforcement upon the intelligence test performance of black adults.

This study examined the effects of contingent verbal and nonverbal reinforcement upon the intelligence test performance of bladk adults. Thirty-six Ss (half male and half female) were pretested on the Quick Test and then administered the complete WAIS under one of three treatment conditions: verbal reinforcement, nonverbal reinforcement or no reinforcement (control condition). Verbal reinforcement was administered as statements of "good" or "fine" by the E, while nonverbal reinforcement took the form of a nod of the head or a statement of "Mmhm." The primary analysis of the data indicated no significant differences between the treatment conditions.

Adult↗