Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Needlestick Injuries”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Student occupational exposure incidence: perception versus reality.

Reports of clinical injuries made to a dental school Office of Occupational Health and Safety at the time of their occurrence were compared to self-reports on a survey for dental students in five classes at various times over their educational careers. The majority of injuries were from needlesticks and mishaps with hand instruments. Underreporting at the time of injury was approximately one-third in the first clinical year and one-half in the final clinical year of the three-year program. Students reported a greater perceived likelihood of injury later in their education than at the beginning but a decreased fear of such injuries. Female students reported more needlesticks and a greater fear of injury than did male students. It is hypothesized that a personal interpretation of the meaning of clinical injuries influences reporting behavior.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed1993

Accidental injection of white spirit into the hand in golfers.

We report two cases in which white spirit has been injected accidentally into the hand by golfers, while attempting to remove the grip of the golf-club handle in order to replace it. One of our patients has anecdotal evidence of this happening in at least two other cases, one of which resulted in amputation of the index finger, and the other in severe damage to the thumb.

Accidents↗
PubMed2004

Retinal detachment from inadvertent intraocular injection of botulinum toxin A.

PURPOSE: To report a case of inadvertent intraocular injection of botulinum toxin A (Botox, BTA) resulting in a retinal tear and bullous retinal detachment. The retinal detachment resolved spontaneously, and the tear was treated with laser demarcation with good visual outcome. DESIGN: Interventional case report. METHODS: A 36-year-old woman underwent Botox injections for paralytic esotropia and developed ocular perforation. Dilated fundus examination showed a slit-like retinal tear infranasally with a bullous retinal detachment nasally. RESULTS: The retinal detachment spontaneously resolved, and the patient was treated with laser demarcation on the following day. After 2 more days, her vision returned to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Botox did not appear toxic to human intraocular tissues. Close observation may be indicated in the event of an inadvertent intraocular Botox injection.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Severe visual loss caused by ocular perforation during chalazion removal.

PURPOSE: To report two cases of ocular perforation during chalazion removal procedures leading to severe vision loss. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Two patients presented with unilateral decreased vision after chalazion removal procedures. Complete ophthalmologic examinations were performed. RESULTS: Examination revealed a cherry red spot and perforation site in the first patient. In the second patient, there was an intraocular gas bubble and ischemic retina. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetic injections for procedures such as chalazia removal can result in ocular perforation. We postulate that the intraocular injections led to extremely high pressures, compromising the blood supply to the retina and optic nerve. Anesthetic injections for all procedures, even chalazia removal, should be done with great caution. It is imperative to avoid injection if ocular perforation is suspected, as the high pressure may cause the majority of the visual morbidity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Vitreoretinal surgery after inadvertent globe penetration during local ocular anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review visual morbidity resulting from inadvertent globe penetration during administration of local anesthetic and to identify the most appropriate management. DESIGN: The records of 20 consecutive patients referred to a specialist vitreoretinal unit over a 2-year period were reviewed. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty eyes of 20 consecutive patients were included. INTERVENTION: Observations included type of local anesthetic administered (e.g., retrobulbar or peribulbar), level of training of person administering the block, type of needle used for the block, and findings at presentation to the vitreoretinal unit. The authors also observed results of B-scan ultrasound evaluation of the retina, interval between the recognition of the complication and referral, as well as nature and timing of subsequent surgical intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Final visual acuity and retinal status (attached versus detached) were measured. RESULTS: The most common presentation was vitreous hemorrhage observed from the first postoperative day. Ten eyes were found to have an associated retinal detachment on initial assessment in the vitreoretinal unit. These eyes generally had a poor visual outcome despite vitrectomy with long-acting gas or silicone oil tamponade. Seven (70%) of the remaining eyes with attached retina at the time of presentation achieved good visual recovery after vitrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend prompt referral for consideration of early vitrectomy in eyes with dense vitreous hemorrhage after inadvertent globe penetration. This management may improve the overall visual prognosis by preventing subsequent retinal detachment.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

[An epidemiological investigation on injection related risk factors].

OBJECTIVE: To explore risk factors of injection-related sharp injury and to provide safety injection guidance to healthcare takers. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey and 1:1 case-control study was used to study the epidemiological features and risk factors of sharp injuries among 3010 clinical nurses and nurse students from 13 hospitals in Guangzhou. Logistic multiple factor analysis was used. RESULTS: Eighty-seven point five percent of nurses have suffered injuries at last once time. During the past month, 37.6% of the nurses have suffered injuries at least once time. The frequency of the injuries was 0.84 per person month. Through multiple logistic regression analysis, data showed that the risk factors leading to the sharp injuries in orders were: contacting the needle more frequently, subjectively thinking that the sharp injuries as unavoidable, the atmosphere in the nursing unit was not harmonious enough, recapping habit, carelessness at work, too many patients that not cooperating, breaking the ampule off without using carbasus, crowded and noisy working place, lack of acknowledge on prevention, lack of the awareness on how to avoiding the accident, having an initiative and creative personality etc. CONCLUSION: The results provided a foundation for the department of infection control in the hospital and sanitary administration department to constitute safety injection policies.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2001

Preventing needlesticks in emergency medical system workers.

Emergency medical system (EMS) workers frequently use sharp devices in injury-prone circumstances that involve limited visibility, confined spaces, rapidly moving vehicles, and uncooperative victims. This study examined the efficacy of an automatic self-retracting lancet in reducing needlestick injuries and related direct and indirect costs. Subjects were 477 active-duty EMS workers. Counseling, laboratory testing (hepatitis B and C, hepatic function enzymes, and human immunodeficiency virus), antiviral prophylaxis, and immunizations were provided according to US Public Health Service guidelines. Baseline and biennial laboratory testing for hepatitis B and C and liver function enzymes were conducted. After the introduction of a spring-loaded automatic-retracting type glucometer lancet device, needlestick injuries decreased from 16 per 954 EMS worker-years to 2 per 477 EMS worker-years. The annualized cost of treatment declined from $8276 to $2068. The change to a self-retracting device decreased the number of needlestick injuries and was cost-effective with a minimal increase in device cost (annualized $366 per year).

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed1992

Needle stick injuries.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗