Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Laparoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Laparoscopic cholecystostomy with delayed cholecystectomy as an alternative to conversion to open procedure.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis carries the highest incidence of conversion from planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery due to unclear anatomy, excessive bleeding, complications, or other technical reasons. METHODS: Laparoscopic tube cholecystostomy was performed instead of immediate conversion to laparotomy in 9 patients with acute cholecystitis after unsuccessful attempts at laparoscopic dissection. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done 3 months later. RESULTS: Following this approach eight patients were treated successfully. After 3 months the acute process had subsided sufficiently to allow a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One additional patient died of acute leukemia 6 weeks after cholecystostomy. Before adopting this technique we subjected 171 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis to laparoscopic cholecystectomy; there was an 11% (19 cases) rate of conversion. Since cholecystostomy has begun to be offered as an alternative to conversion, 121 patients with acute cholecystitis have had laparoscopic cholecystectomy and only 2 cases (1.5%) have been converted to immediate open cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the alternative of performing a cholecystostomy with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy instead of conversion to open procedure when facing a case of acute cholecystitis not amenable to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

Controlled trial of laparoscopic-assisted vs open colon resection in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Several series of laparoscopic colon resection have been reported in the literature with varied results; however, no controlled series of laparoscopic vs open colon resection has been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative safety and adequacy of laparoscopic colon resection in a controlled trial using a porcine model. METHODS: Domestic pigs (n = 23) were randomly divided into two groups. Animals underwent either an open or laparoscopic-assisted segmental resection of the sigmoid colon. The open resections were performed through a 20-cm midline incision and the laparoscopic technique utilized five 12-mm ports. Laparoscopic resection took twice as long to complete as open resection (P < 0.001). Return of gastric function was significantly faster in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P < 0.032). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in total length of resection, proximal or distal margins, number of lymph nodes recovered, length of mesenteric vessel resected, or time to return of bowel function. At vivisection, more adhesions to the abdominal wall were noted in the open group (P < 0.002). One death occurred in the laparoscopic group 2 h postoperatively (8.3% mortality) while all open group pigs survived. However, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates by chi-square analysis (P > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer operative time, laparoscopic intervention is technically feasible, safe, and may offer significant postoperative benefits due to fewer abdominal adhesions.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed2004

Small-incision (mini-laparotomy) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in a university hospital.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into general practice in 1990, it has rapidly become the dominant procedure for gallbladder surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the laparoscopic, open and mini-laparotomy approaches to cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study covers a period of 6 years. A total of 1,276 patients underwent cholecystectomy for calculous biliary disease. The laparoscopic procedure was applied to 952 (74.6%) patients, while 210 (16.5%) underwent the traditional open cholecystectomy and the remaining 114 (8.9%) patients underwent mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (3.9%) from the laparoscopic group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Morbidity was similar in the open and laparoscopic groups (3.8%), while it was significantly lower in the mini-laparotomy group (0.8%). No major bile duct injuries occurred after the open or mini-laparotomy approaches. The median operation time was significantly shorter in the mini-laparotomy group than in the laparoscopic group (46 min vs 61 min). Hospital stay was significantly longer for the open cholecystectomy group (mean value 5.1 days) compared with the laparoscopic and mini-laparotomy groups (mean values 2.5 days and 2.7 days, respectively). Hospital expenses showed a saving of 786 Euro for each patient who underwent the open procedure and 980 Euro for each patient who underwent the mini-laparotomy approach compared with the laparoscopic one. CONCLUSION: We believe that commissioners of healthcare should question whether the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy justify the additional cost after the introduction of the mini-laparotomy approach.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Transitions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the impact of ambulatory surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common practice in the United States, but its development remains slow in most other countries. The objective of the current study was to report the impact of ambulatory surgery on the practice of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major teaching hospital since the inception of the service. METHODS: The hospital database of patients who underwent cholecystectomies for benign hepatobiliary pathologies was reviewed between January 1993 and December 1999. Changes in the practice of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the length of hospital stay were analyzed. Clinical characteristics of the ambulatory and inpatient groups were compared. RESULTS: Of 2,891 laparoscopic cholecystectomies involved in the current study, 888 (31%) were performed as day cases, and 2,003 (69%) were performed as inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The annual number of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies increased from 3 (0.6%) in 1993 to 212 (48%) in 1997. This was followed by a plateau in the next 3 years. The ambulatory group comprised a significantly higher prevalence of young women (87%) who underwent surgery mainly for biliary colic (88%). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated a net trend toward ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy and a shorter length of hospital stay. Almost half of our patients with gallstone disease currently are using the ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy service, with young women constituting the majority. We predict that ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy heralds the wave of the future, and our experience may serve as a blueprint for other institutions wishing to embark on this journey.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting significantly improves success of postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low-volume centers.

BACKGROUND: Occult common bile duct stones (CBDS) discovered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography are most often managed by postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Expert endoscopists at high-volume centers achieve common bile duct cannulation in nearly all patients undergoing ERCP, but cannulation rates of less than 80% have been observed in low-volume centers. As many as 20% of patients with CBDS referred for postoperative ERCP in low-volume centers may require repeated attempts at ERCP, referral to a high-volume center, percutaneous transhepatic techniques, or reoperation for clearance of CBDS when postoperative ERCP fails. METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography performed in 511 consecutive patients over 80 months at a community hospital showed occult CBDS in 66 patients (12.9%). Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement was successful in 65 patients (98.5%). As part of an earlier study, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with clearance of CBDS before stent placement. Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement failed in one patient for whom CBDS were cleared with intraoperative ERCP. RESULTS: Initial postoperative ERCP was successful in clearing CBDS in all 65 patients (100%) with laparoscopically placed stents. During the same period, 611 patients underwent ERCP for various indications including CBDS (43%). Selective cannulation was achieved in 78% of all patients during initial ERCP. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement is an effective adjunct to the management of occult CBDS. Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting ensures selective cannulation during postoperative ERCP and eliminates the need for repeated attempts at ERCP, referral to specialty centers, use of transhepatic techniques, or reoperation for retained CBDS. Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement for treatment of occult CBDS significantly improves the success of postoperative ERCP in low-volume centers and eliminates the morbidity and expense of repeated procedures.

Catheterization↗
PubMed2002

The surgeon on call is a strong factor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and open approaches are commonly used for appendectomy. No previous studies have specifically examined which factors determine whether a laparoscopic or open approach is used for appendectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 140 patients who underwent a laparoscopic (n = 60) or open (n = 80) appendectomy between January 2000 and April 2001 at our hospital. Medical records were reviewed, and the data were analyzed using chi-square analysis, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and multivariate logistic regression. We studied patient age, gender, type of surgeon on call, leukocyte count, pathology, and the use of diagnostic imaging to determine whether there was any association with the use of a laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: The type of surgeon on call was strongly correlated with a laparoscopic approach. Of the 61 appendectomies performed by laparoscopic surgeons (those who use laparoscopy for operations other than appendectomies and cholecystectomies), 55 (90%) were laparoscopic and 6 (10%) were open. Of the 79 appendectomies performed by nonlaparoscopic surgeons, 5 (6%) were laparoscopic and 74 (94%) were open (multivariate odds ratio, 136; 95% confidence interval, 39-475; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon on call when a patient is admitted is an important factor determining whether a patient will receive a laparoscopic or open appendectomy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic surgery has become widespread during the past decade, no systematic study of the training needs exists. To obtain guidance for planning, we analyzed the national resident operative experience during the past 8 years. METHODS: The laparoscopic experiences of all surgical residents graduating between 1994 and 2001 were subjected to regression analysis. The laparoscopic volume of each trainee and change in ratio of laparoscopic/open operation over time were used to estimate the growth of individual laparoscopic operations in training programs. RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery constituted only 5.7% of a trainee's total surgical experience in 1994, but comprised 13% by 2001. A resident completing training in 1994 performed 53 laparoscopic operations, of which 79% (42) were cholecystectomies. By 2001, a graduate performed 126 laparoscopic operations, of which 68% (86) were cholecystectomies. During the interim, most laparoscopic operations exhibited growth. Trainee experience in some newer operations has also increased steadily but at a much slower rate. CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive statistical survey of training experience yields a comprehensive picture of the laparoscopic capability of the young surgeon. The growth potential of some newer operations has also been measured. Using these data, guidelines can be drawn as to which operation programs should focus resources on training residents. Since competence depends on exposure, residency training alone may not provide sufficient depth to allow recent graduates to perform the newer operations independently.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic surgery preserves monocyte-mediated tumor cell killing in contrast to the conventional approach.

BACKGROUND: Experimental animal research shows that immunologic defenses against tumor cells are disturbed by surgical trauma, resulting in an increased rate of tumor implantation and the growth of subsequent metastases. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with a preservation of postoperative immunologic functions and, in animal models, with decreased tumor growth. The objective was to study the influence of several surgical procedures, approached conventionally and laparoscopically, on interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte-mediated cytotoxicity (MMC). METHODS: Five groups of five patients each were included in this prospective study: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (minor trauma) group, Nissen fundoplication (laparoscopic and conventional as moderate trauma) groups, and sigmoid colectomy (laparoscopic and conventional as major trauma) groups. Preoperatively, 1 and 4 days after surgery, IL-6 and MMC against SW948 colon cancer cell line were determined. RESULTS: The IL-6 levels differed significantly between the three laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.004) and increased according to the degree of trauma. There was no significant difference in MMC between the three laparoscopic procedures. However, MMC was suppressed after conventional procedures and preserved after laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.001). There was no correlation between IL-6 levels and changes in MMC. CONCLUSIONS: More extensive laparoscopic procedures induce increased levels of IL-6, reflecting higher levels of trauma. Conventional surgical procedures result in depressed MMC in the postoperative period. After laparoscopic procedures, MMC is preserved. These findings may be of importance in preventing implantation and growth of cancer cells spread by surgical manipulation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Cost and benefit of the trained laparoscopic team. A comparative study of a designated nursing team vs a nontrained team.

BACKGROUND: In spite of the emergence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic gallstones, questions still remain regarding its overall cost effectiveness, especially at low-volume centers where operating room (OR) time and operative complications are higher. We hypothesize that the presence of a well-organized, dedicated laparoscopic OR team will improve surgical outcomes for this procedure. This study compares the operative results of an advanced and a basic laparoscopic surgeon using either a designated laparoscopic operating team or a nondesignated team. METHODS: The hospital records for 71 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies with cholangiograms were retrospectively reviewed and anesthesia times and conversion rates were analyzed. Procedures were performed either at a hospital with a dedicated laparoscopy team or a hospital with nondedicated OR personnel. All procedures were done by an advanced laparoscopic surgeon or a basic laparoscopic surgeon. RESULTS: Case characteristics were evenly matched between sites and surgeons. The mean total anesthesia time at the dedicated site was 120.8 min, compared to 152.3 min at the nondedicated site with a mean difference of 31.5 min (p = 0.001). A 12% conversion rate was documented at the nondedicated site. There were no conversions at the site with a dedicated laparoscopy team. No major complications were encountered in this series. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that having a designated laparoscopic trained team provides a time savings to both advanced and basic laparoscopic surgeons. Although no major complications were encountered, there was a significant conversion rate for the less experienced surgeon operating without the support of a trained team. The end result from having a dedicated team in endoscopic surgery is decreased operative time, an improvement in patient care, and decreased costs to the patient and institution.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
PubMed2004

Initial experience with complex laparoscopic biliary surgery in children: biliary atresia and choledochal cyst.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic approaches are possible for many pediatric surgical diseases, including complex biliary disorders. The authors describe their early experience with laparoscopic procedures for biliary atresia and choledochal cysts. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed with Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval of children undergoing laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy (n = 2) or laparoscopic excision of a choledochal cyst with Roux-en-y biliary reconstruction (n = 3). The authors report the operative technique for these procedures and present their initial results. RESULTS: All procedures were performed with 4 to 5 trocars using 3- and 5-mm ports. Excision of the fibrous biliary remnant (biliary atresia) or of the cyst (choledochal cysts) was performed laparoscopically in all cases. The Roux-en-y limb was created through a 1-cm extension of the umbilical port site. Laparoscopic biliary reconstruction was performed successfully in 4 of 5 patients. In one child, the proximal extent of the choledochal cyst was at the bifurcation of the hepatic duct, and the biliary reconstruction was performed via an open incision with separate anastomoses of the right and left ducts. The gallbladder was used as a handle for retraction of the liver for portal visualization, as in a cholecystectomy, and was resected at the end of the procedure. All children with choledochal cysts have normal bilirubin values. One of 2 children who underwent laparoscopic Kasai has a normal postoperative bilirubin level, whereas the other child did not drain bile and underwent a successful liver transplantation. Mean length of surgery was 338 minutes; mean length of stay was 5.5 days. There were no significant postoperative complications. Cosmesis was excellent in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approaches for children with biliary atresia and choledochal cysts are possible. Excellent visualization of the portal structures can be achieved laparoscopically with adequate retraction of the liver. Further follow-up is needed to determine broader application.

Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y↗
PubMed2002

Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has replaced open cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallbladder disease. However, certain cases still require conversion to open procedures. Identifying these patients at risk for conversion remains difficult. This study identifies risk factors that may predict conversion from a laparoscopic to an open procedure. METHODS: From January 1996 to January 2000, a total of 1,347 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF). A retrospective analysis of 34 parameters including patient demographics, clinical history, laboratory data, ultrasound results, and intraoperative details was performed. Stepwise, multivariate logistic regression was used to determine those variables predicting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Seventy-one (5.3%) laparoscopic cholecystectomies required conversion. Multivariate analysis revealed that for all cases, a white blood cell count >9 (2.9 greater odds ratio [OR] of conversion P = 0.006) and a gallbladder wall thickness >0.4 cm (7.2 OR, P <0.001) predicted conversion to open cholecystectomy. However, when patients with acute cholecystitis were evaluated only a body mass index >30 kg/m(2) (5.6 OR, P = 0.02) predicted conversion. For patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy, a body mass index >40 kg/m(2) (33.1 OR, P = 0.01) and a wall thickness >0.4 cm (24.7 OR, P <0.004) predicted conversion. Finally, an ASA >2 (5.3 OR, P = 0.01) predicted conversion in patients undergoing nonelective cholecystectomies. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy have an increased chance of conversion. Likewise, patients with multiple comorbid diseases undergoing nonelective laparoscopic cholecystectomy are more likely to require conversion. Finally, in an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, morbidly obese patients with chronic cholecystitis and a thickened gallbladder wall are more likely to require conversion. These factors can help counsel patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with regards to the probability of conversion to an open procedure.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
PubMed2000

Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effect of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on surgical outcomes in routine practice. METHODS: Hospital discharge and death-certificate data were linked for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy (n=85120) in Scottish public-sector hospitals (n=51) between January, 1981, and June, 1999. The primary endpoints were cholecystectomy rate, hospital stay, and postoperative mortality. Regression methods were used to examine the effect of laparoscopic experience and surgeon caseload on postoperative mortality and hospital stay. FINDINGS: From 1989 to 1999, the proportion of cholecystectomies done laparoscopically rose from none to 80%, and the age-standardised cholecystectomy rate increased by 20% (95% CI 15-26). Postoperative mortality did not change in the 1990s (odds ratio 0.99 [0.7-1.4], p=0.99). The mean postoperative hospital stay fell from 8.0 (SD 3.7) to 2.9 (3.2) days. There was wide variation between hospitals in the proportion of cholecystectomies done laparoscopically and in average hospital stay. For individual surgeons, increasing laparoscopic experience and annual caseload were associated with higher proportions of laparoscopic procedures and shorter hospital stays. Postoperative mortality was higher during the first ten laparoscopic cholecystectomies done by a surgeon (compared with >200 procedures, odds ratio 2.3 [1.2-4.6], p=0.015). INTERPRETATION: The laparoscopic method reduced hospital stay but had no overall effect on postoperative mortality. Studies to assess the appropriateness of the increased cholecystectomy rate are merited. The wide variation in the proportion done laparoscopically, together with evidence of better results for surgeons doing more procedures, suggests scope for further reductions in hospital stay and morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The safety and short-term benefits of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer remain debatable. The multicentre COLOR (COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection) trial was done to assess the safety and benefit of laparoscopic resection compared with open resection for curative treatment of patients with cancer of the right or left colon. METHODS: 627 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic surgery and 621 patients to open surgery. The primary endpoint was cancer-free survival 3 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes were short-term morbidity and mortality, number of positive resection margins, local recurrence, port-site or wound-site recurrence, metastasis, overall survival, and blood loss during surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. Here, clinical characteristics, operative findings, and postoperative outcome are reported. FINDINGS: Patients assigned laparoscopic resection had less blood loss compared with those assigned open resection (median 100 mL [range 0-2700] vs 175 mL [0-2000], p<0.0001), although laparoscopic surgery lasted 30 min longer than did open surgery (p<0.0001). Conversion to open surgery was needed for 91 (17%) patients undergoing the laparoscopic procedure. Radicality of resection as assessed by number of removed lymph nodes and length of resected oral and aboral bowel did not differ between groups. Laparoscopic colectomy was associated with earlier recovery of bowel function (p<0.0001), need for fewer analgesics, and with a shorter hospital stay (p<0.0001) compared with open colectomy. Morbidity and mortality 28 days after colectomy did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Laparoscopic surgery can be used for safe and radical resection of cancer in the right, left, and sigmoid colon.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is becoming more popular, although endoscopic sphincterotomy remains the usual treatment for bile duct stones. However, loss of the biliary sphincter causes permanent duodenobiliary reflux, and recurrent stone disease and biliary neoplasia may be a consequence. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to compare laparoscopic exploration with endoscopic sphincterotomy. A text word search of the Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases, and a manual search of the citations from these references, was used. RESULTS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with a median (range) mortality rate of 1 (0-6) per cent, compared with 1 (0-5) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. The median (range) rate of pancreatitis following endoscopic sphincterotomy is 3 (1-19) per cent; this is a rare complication after laparoscopic duct exploration. The combined morbidity rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy is 13 (3-16) per cent, which is greater than 8 (2-17) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Randomized trials are few and contain relatively small numbers of patients. They show little overall difference in rates of duct clearance, but a higher mortality rate and number of hospital admissions are noted for endoscopic sphincterotomy compared with laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with recurrent stone formation (up to 16 per cent) with associated cholangitis. It is also associated with bacterobilia and chronic mucosal inflammation. The late development of bile duct cancer has been reported in up to 2 per cent of patients. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct may be a better way of removing stones than endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. :

Aged↗
PubMed2000

[Determining the status of laparoscopic surgery in East Brandenburg. Results of a survey].

In October 1998 the surgical hospitals of Eastern Brandenburg have been questioned about the level of laparoscopic surgery. The datas of 14 hospitals were summarized. 14% of 20.574 general surgical operations done in 1998 were performed laparoscopically. Three procedures--laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hernioplasty and appendectomy--comprised 98% of the laparoscopic operations. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was the standard procedure for treatment of symptomatic gallstones in all hospitals. 83% of the cholecystectomies were performed by minimal invasive technique. The laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was done in 10 of 14 hospitals. 30% of the inguinal hernias were operated by the laparoscopic method. The TAPP was the favorite operating procedure. For treatment of recurrent hernias the "tension free technique" was used in 12 of 14 hospitals. The implantation of a net is done equally by Lichtenstein's-repair and laparoscopically. Laparoscopic appendectomy has not been accepted as routine operating method. 83% of appendectomies were performed conventionally.

Appendectomy↗
PubMed2001

A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses.

BACKGROUND: Previous randomized studies of laparoscopic appendectomy produced conflicting recommendations, and the adequacy of sample sizes is generally unknown. We compared clinical and economic outcomes after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a sample of predetermined statistical power. METHODS: A pre-study power analysis suggested that 200 randomized patients would yield 80% power to show a mean decrease of 1.3 days' hospitalization. One hundred ninety-eight patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized prospectively to laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Economic analysis included billed charges, total costs, direct costs, and indirect costs associated with treatment. RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy took longer to perform than open appendectomy (median, 107 vs 91 minutes; P <.01) and was associated with fewer days to return to a general diet (mean, 1.6 versus 2.3 days; P <.01), a shorter duration of parenteral analgesia (mean, 1.6 versus 2.2 days; P <.01), fewer morphine-equivalent milligrams of parenteral narcotic (median, 14 mg versus 34 mg; P =.001), a shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean, 2.6 versus 3.4 days; P <.01), and earlier return to full activity (median, 14 versus 21 days; P <.02). However, operative morbidity and time to return to work were comparable. Billed charges and direct costs were not significantly different in the 2 groups ($7711 versus $7146 and $5357 versus $4945, respectively), but total costs (including indirect costs) of laparoscopic appendectomy were, on average, nearly $2400 less, given the shorter length of stay and abbreviated recuperative period ($11,577 versus $13,965). Subgroup analyses suggested the benefit of a laparoscopic approach for uncomplicated appendicitis and for patients with active lifestyles. CONCLUSIONS: While laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with statistically significant but clinically questionable advantages over open appendectomy, a laparoscopic approach is relatively less expensive. The estimated difference in total costs of treatment (direct and indirect costs) was at least $2000 in more than 60% of the bootstrapped iterations. The economic significance and implications favoring a laparoscopic approach cannot be ignored.

Appendectomy↗
PubMed1993

Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

OBJECTIVE: This article determined which preoperative data correlated with successful completion of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice in chronic cholecystitis, its use in acute cholecystitis may be associated with higher costs and complication rates. It is not known which patients with acute cholecystitis are likely to require conversion to open cholecystectomy based on preoperative data or if a cooling-off period with medical therapy can diminish inflammation and increase the chance of successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: All laparoscopic cholecystectomies done by the authors between 10/90 and 2/92 were reviewed. Data on cases of acute cholecystitis were prospectively collected on standardized data forms. RESULTS: Twenty of 281 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were done for acute cholecystitis; 7/20 patients with acute cholecystitis required conversion to open cholecystectomy compared with 6/281 patients undergoing elective operation for chronic cholecystitis. In patients with acute cholecystitis the interval from admission to cholecystectomy in the successful cases was 0.6 days vs. 5 days in the cases requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy (p = .01). Cases requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy also had higher WBC (14.0 vs. 9.0, p < .05), alkaline phosphatase (206 vs. 81, p < .02, and APACHE II scores (10.6 vs. 5.1, p < .05). Ultrasonographic findings such as gallbladder distention, wall thickness, and pericholecystic fluid did not correlate with the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy required more operating room time (120 min vs. 87 min, p < .01) and more postop hospital days (6 vs. 2, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis should be done immediately after the diagnosis is established because delaying surgery allows inflammation to become more intense, thus increasing the technical difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. A new technique for the management of complex choledocholithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy represents a new technique that expands the ability of the surgeon to manage complex choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors describe their experience with six patients with cholelithiasis and complex common bile duct stone disease who underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy and antegrade sphincterotomies. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with complex choledocholithiasis have represented a technical challenge to the minimally invasive surgeon. Recently, a laparoscopic technique of antegrade biliary sphincterotomy has been reported by DePaulo in Brazil. This technique has been successful at clearing the common bile duct at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was performed in six patients with multiple common bile duct stones. A standard endoscopic sphincterotome was introduced antegrade via the cystic duct or common bile duct and guided through the ampulla. A side-viewing duodenoscope was used to confirm proper positioning of the sphincterotome. Then a blended current was applied until the sphincterotomy was complete. RESULTS: There was no mortality or morbidity associated with laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. The mean additional operative time to complete laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was 19 minutes. Three of the six patients were noted to have transient, asymptomatic elevation in serum amylase levels immediately after surgery (average 252 international units/L; normal < 115), which normalized within 72 hours. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.9 days. At a mean follow-up of 5 months (range 1 to 10 months), five patients remain asymptomatic. One individual with acquired immune deficiency syndrome had persistent symptoms, and a diagnosis of cytomegalovirus pancreatitis was eventually made. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy appears to be a safe and effective technique for the management of complex biliary tract disease.

Adult↗