Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insurance Coverage”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources

Private health insurance of chronically ill children.

Accurate information regarding the adequacy of private health insurance coverage available to the families of chronically ill children is scarce. A national survey was conducted of firms offering health insurance to employees and their dependents. Data were collected concerning private health insurance coverage of services needed by chronically ill children, including basic medical care services, ancillary therapies, mental health services, and long-term care. Nearly all surveyed firms offered health insurance. Coverage of inpatient hospital care, outpatient physician services, medical supplies and equipment, x-ray studies, laboratory services, and prescription medications was widespread, but coverage of services such as physical therapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and nutrition services was much less prevalent. More than two thirds of the firms covered comprehensive home health services but often with limits and only in lieu of more expensive inpatient care. Long-term care, such as skilled nursing home care, was covered by only one third of firms. Overall, the survey results, combined with information concerning recent trends in private health insurance, reveal increasing coverage of lower cost alternatives to hospital or institutional care and improved maximum lifetime benefits and stop-loss coverage but also increased cost-sharing requirements. These results suggest that, although families with chronically ill children may have access to a widening range of services such as home health care or individual benefits management, they may be forced to bear an increasing proportion of the cost.

Child↗

Access to emergency care: restricted by long waiting times and cost and coverage concerns.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We monitor progress toward Healthy People 2010 objectives of reducing health disparities and decreasing delay and difficulty in access to emergency care. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of 2001 National Health Interview Survey interviews of 33,326 adults to provide population-based estimates of self-reported delay, difficulty, or inability to get care from a hospital emergency department (ED) in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS: About 7.7% of the estimated 36.6 million adults who sought care in a hospital ED in the preceding 12 months reported a delay in receiving care, having difficulty receiving care, or being unable to receive care. Waiting times were the most frequently noted cause of problems. Concerns about service costs and insurance coverage were also commonly cited access barriers. Access problems were more likely to be reported by adults without health insurance, younger adults, adults in fair or poor health, and adults with annual incomes of less than 20,000 dollars. CONCLUSION: Self-reported access to ED care is impeded by prolonged waiting times and by cost and insurance coverage concerns. These access problems are occurring more frequently among groups that face multiple social and economic disadvantages. Hospital operational changes to reduce ED treatment delays and health care financing policies that reduce insurance coverage inequities may both be needed to meet these Healthy People 2010 objectives.

Adolescent↗

Drug insurance instability and its correlates: results from the 2000 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

BACKGROUND: Health insurance instability (ie, temporal gaps in health insurance coverage) is a prevalent phenomenon in the United States. To date, most studies have focused on the factors that affect the intermittent lack of health insurance coverage. However, no studies known to the authors have examined the factors associated with prescription drug insurance instability (ie, temporal gaps in drug insurance coverage) among working-age adults. Developing an accurate profile of persons with unstable drug insurance is essential to formulate rational policy to address this problem. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to (1) document the prevalence of prescription insurance instability among working-age adults and (2) describe the association between prescription drug insurance instability and demographic, socioeconomic status, and employment characteristics. METHODS: The data source used in this study was the 2000 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. This study used a cross-sectional design using data provided by respondents at each of the 3 interviews conducted during the year 2000. Chi-square and hierarchical multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to describe the associations among (1) demographics, (2) socioeconomic status, and (3) employment characteristics and drug insurance status (classified as continuous, absent, or unstable). RESULTS: During the year 2000, 12.5% (21.1 million) of the working-age adults in the United States had unstable prescription drug coverage. Persons aged 35-54 years had lower rates of drug insurance instability compared with those aged 18-24 [adjusted odds ratio 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.80)]. The least educated (12 or fewer years of education) were more likely than those with more education (13-16 years) to experience at least one period without drug coverage (62% vs 32%, P<0.01). The poorest respondents (those at less than 200% of the federal poverty level) were more likely than the wealthiest respondents (those at more than 400% of the poverty level) to report at least some time without drug coverage (37% vs 28%, P<0.01). Those experiencing a divorce or death of a spouse were more than twice as likely as stably married persons to experience at least one period without drug insurance [adjusted odds ratio 2.23 (95% confidence interval 1.68-2.96)]. Adults who were unstably employed during the year and/or who worked for small firms generally experienced higher rates of drug insurance instability. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription drug insurance instability is a prevalent phenomenon among working-age adults in the United States, with approximately 1 in 8 experiencing this problem during 2000. Our results suggest that demographics, socioeconomic status, and employment characteristics all play important roles in predicting prescription drug insurance status, with the least educated and poorest being particularly vulnerable to interruptions in drug coverage. Premium assistance programs providing subsidies to small firms' low-income employees and permitting small firms to form insurance pools may help to decrease the number of drug coverage uninsurance spells in this population.

Adolescent↗

Out-of-pocket financial burden for low-income families with children: socioeconomic disparities and effects of insurance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether socioeconomic disparities exist in the financial burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) health care expenditures for families with children, and whether health insurance coverage decreases financial burden for low-income families. DATA SOURCE: The Household Component of the 2001 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional family-level analysis. We used bivariate statistics to examine whether financial burden varied by poverty level. Multivariate regression models were used to assess whether family insurance coverage was associated with level of financial burden for low-income families. The main outcome was financial burden, defined as the proportion of family income spent on OOP health care expenditures, including premiums, for all family members. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION: We aggregated annual OOP expenditures for all members of 4,531 families with a child <18 years old. Family insurance coverage was categorized as follows: (1) all members publicly insured all year, (2) all members privately insured all year, (3) all members uninsured all year, (4) partial coverage, or (5) mix of public and private with no uninsured periods. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A regressive gradient was noted for financial burden across income groups, with families with incomes <100 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) spending a mean of 119.66 US dollars OOP per 1,000 US dollars of family income and families with incomes 100-199 percent FPL spending 66.30 US dollars OOP per 1,000 US dollars, compared with 37.75 US dollars for families with incomes >400 percent FPL. For low-income families (<200 percent FPL), there was a 785 percent decrease in financial burden for those with full-year public coverage compared with those with full-year private insurance (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic disparities exist in the financial burden of OOP health care expenditures for families with children. For low-income families, full-year public coverage provides significantly greater protection from financial burden than full-year private coverage.

Adolescent↗

State Medicaid coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments--United States, 2005.

In 2005, approximately 41 million persons in the United States had health insurance coverage through Medicaid, a federally and state-funded health-care program, managed at the state level, for persons with limited incomes. An estimated 29% of adult Medicaid recipients were current smokers in 2004. The 2000 Public Health Service (PHS) clinical practice guideline recommends that insurance coverage be provided for tobacco-dependence treatments, including both medication (i.e., bupropion hydrochloride or nicotine patch, gum, inhaler, or nasal spray) and counseling (i.e., individual, group, or telephone). A national health objective for 2010 is to increase insurance coverage of evidence-based treatments for tobacco dependence among all 51 Medicaid programs (objective 27-8). The type of coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments offered by Medicaid has been reported since 1998, and most recently for 2003, from state surveys conducted by the Center for Health and Public Policy Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. All states and the District of Columbia (collectively referred to as states in this report) were resurveyed in 2005 regarding types of coverage and limitations in coverage since 1994. This report summarizes the results of that survey, which indicated that as of December 31, 2005, 1) 38 state Medicaid programs covered some tobacco-dependence treatment (i.e., counseling or medication) for all Medicaid recipients; 2) four states offered coverage only for pregnant women; 3) one state (Oregon) offered coverage for all medication and counseling treatments recommended by the 2000 PHS guideline; and 4) seven states (including Oregon) covered all recommended medications and at least one form of counseling. If the 2010 national health objective is to be achieved, states should offer or increase Medicaid coverage for treatment of tobacco dependence.

Counseling↗

Bond ratings, debt insurance, and hospital operating performance.

In this study, the operating performances of not-for-profit community hospitals are compared among groups partitioned by bond ratings, level of debt insurance coverage, and number of bond rating services. The analysis indicates that the performances of hospitals with full debt insurance coverage resulting in AAA ratings are significantly lower than those of hospitals with partial debt insurance and with AA ratings or better. Indeed, the hospitals with full debt insurance resemble those with partial insurance that are rated BBB to A. These findings have implications for managerial action choices. Hospitals seeking external funding to improve their operating performance may consider the costs and benefits of full insurance coverage.

Analysis of Variance↗

Children of working low-income families in California: does parental work benefit children's insurance status, access, and utilization of primary health care?

OBJECTIVE: To examine financial and nonfinancial access to care and utilization of primary health care services among children of working low-income families earning below 200 percent of the federal poverty level in California, and to compare them to children in nonworking low-income families and in families earning over 200 percent of poverty. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The 1994 National Health Interview survey weighted to reflect population estimates for California. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study of 3,831 children under age 19 focuses on financial access, that is, the prevalence and continuity of health insurance coverage; structural access, including the presence of a usual source of care, the predominant care source, its responsiveness to patient's needs, and any indications of delayed or missed care; and utilization of health care measured by the presence of an outpatient doctor's visit and the mean number of visits relative to child health status. DATA COLLECTION: The study uses secondary analysis. FINDINGS: Compared to children of nonworking low-income parents and to nonpoor children, children of working low-income parents were more likely to be uninsured (32.1 percent versus 15.6 percent and 10.3 percent, p = .0001) and to experience disruptions in insurance coverage (p = .0009). These differences persisted after controlling for other covariates in multivariate analyses. Children of working low-income parents did not differ significantly from children of nonworking low-income parents on measures of structural access or utilization, after adjusting for other covariates. However, they differed significantly from nonpoor children on structural access and utilization, and these differences mostly persisted after adjusting for other covariates (odds ratios from 1.5 to 2.9). Similar patterns were observed when children of full-time, year-round working parents with low earnings were compared with the two reference populations. CONCLUSION: Children in working low-income families in California have some of the worst access problems. Even full attachment to the workforce does not guarantee health insurance benefits, access to care, or improved health care use for children of low-income parents. These children are not better off than other low-income children of nonworking parents and are much worse off than nonpoor children. Expansion of health insurance coverage through Healthy Families and Medi-Cal, and attention to nonfinancial barriers to care for working low-income families may help to reduce these disparities.

Adolescent↗

Access to care for children of the working poor.

CONTEXT: Recent evidence suggests that children in working poor families lack health resources, placing them at risk for inadequate access to care. OBJECTIVES: To examine financial and nonfinancial access and utilization of health services among children in working poor families, and to compare these data with those of children from both nonworking poor and moderate to affluent families. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of 13 785 children younger than 18 years. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects from the 1997 National Health Interview Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and continuity of health insurance coverage, of delayed or missed care, and of unmet care needs; presence and type of usual source of care; and the amount of visits to physicians, emergency departments, and hospitals. RESULTS: Compared with children of nonworking poor parents and moderate to affluent children, more working poor children were uninsured (22% vs 12% and 5%, respectively; P<.01) and experienced disruptions in insurance coverage (P<.01). After adjusting for other covariates, disparities in insurance coverage and continuity persisted, as did delays in care and unmet care needs; these delays were far higher for the working poor. Although these children had access to a regular source of care and had utilization rates comparable with those of other poor children, they differed markedly from moderate to affluent children on structural access and utilization (adjusted odds ratios, 1.5-3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Children in working poor families experience far more barriers to care than other children. Health insurance expansions through the Children's Health Insurance Program and Medicaid, which reduce financial and nonfinancial barriers to care, may help correct these disparities.

Adolescent↗

Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2000.

OBJECTIVES: This report presents health statistics from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey for the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States, classified by age, sex, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, family income, poverty status, education, place of residence, region of residence, and, where appropriate, health insurance coverage. The topics covered are health status and limitations in activities, special education or early intervention services, injuries and poisonings, health care access and utilization, and health insurance coverage. SOURCE OF DATA: The NHIS is a household, multistage probability sample survey conducted annually by interviewers of the U.S. Census Bureau for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Household interviews were completed for 100,618 persons living in 38,633 households, reflecting a household response rate of 89%. SELECTED HIGHLIGHTS: Nearly 7 in 10 persons were in excellent or very good health in 2000, and fewer than 1 in 10 were in fair or poor health. About 31 million people (11%) were limited in their usual activities due to one or more chronic health conditions, and about 3 million people (2%) required the help of another person with activities of daily living such as bathing and dressing. Persons with the least education and the lowest incomes were the most likely to be limited in their ability to work. About 5% of children received special education or early intervention services. The three leading causes of medically attended injury and poisoning episodes were falls, being struck by a person or an object, and transportation. Among people under age 65 years, about 40 million (17%) did not have any health insurance coverage.

Adolescent↗

Pulling the coverage trigger: the temporal condition of liability insurance.

Timing issues will continue to be at the forefront of insurance coverage disputes for a long time, and may impact not only the question of which insurer is responsible for a particular loss, but also whether any coverage exists at all. For example, if a policyholder has self-insured for any period, the timing issue may well determine whether purchased liability insurance will afford any protection for the loss. Though courts have provided useful guidelines, in order to determine coverage the facts of each case must be carefully examined, particularly the policy language and the nature of the injury on which the claim is founded. When there are difficult timing questions, one viable approach may be for the policyholder to select a "target" insurer to sue for coverage, based in part on the timing analysis, and leave to the targeted insurer the task of seeking contribution from all other carriers potentially responsible for covering the loss.

Eligibility Determination↗

Athletic Medical Insurance Practices at NCAA Division I Institutions.

As the cost of athletic medical insurance continues to rise, athletic departments are searching for ways to continue to provide quality insurance coverage while keeping costs contained. There are few published articles dealing with the specific topic of the daily operations of maintaining an athletic medical insurance program. We sent an 18-item questionnaire to the 295 active NCAA Division I head athletic trainers to ascertain the current trends in athletic medical insurance. Of these, 207 (70%) responded. Of the respondents, 85% were primarily responsible for the administration of their athletic department's insurance coverage, although they had received no formal training in insurance management. Most athletic departments carry secondary policies and many report having a deductible. A wide range of insurance coverage and premiums were reported.

Journal Article↗

The effect of the 30% private health insurance rebate on the purchasing behaviour and intentions of the Australian population.

This article examines the likely effect of the 30% private health insurance rebate on private health insurance coverage. It is based on a survey of the Australia population conducted in April-May 1999 which collected information on health insurance purchasing behaviour and intentions. These data are used to predict the subsidy's likely effect on hospital insurance coverage, with estimates ranging from 30.5% to 34.3% by May 2000. Ancillary insurance membership is forecast to increase to between 32.7% and 37.2% of the population over the same period. The 30% insurance rebate will probably produce, at best, a small increase in hospital insurance membership. The cost of the rebate is estimated at $1.4 billion in 1999-2000. Given the small increases in projected membership, the cost of the initiative is very high.

Age Factors↗

Epilepsy and insurance in the UK: an exploratory survey of the experiences of people with epilepsy.

We investigated problems in obtaining insurance as reported by people with epilepsy who were members of a major United Kingdom patient organisation. Information was collected via questionnaires mailed to a random sample of the membership, 347 of whom replied. Overall, 62% of respondents reported experiencing a problem obtaining insurance coverage (increased premiums, restricted coverage, or outright refusal). Thirty-six percent of respondents reported having been refused one or more types of insurance on the grounds of their epilepsy. Although the low response rate to the study represents an important source of bias, extrapolation from our figures suggests a problem prevalence rate of at least 10%. Adoption of an evidence-based and standardised approach to informing assessments of risk is vital if insurance companies are to provide fair and reasonable terms for insurance coverage to their clients with epilepsy.

Adult↗

Evaluation of New York State's Child Health Plus: access, utilization, quality of health care, and health status.

BACKGROUND: The recently enacted State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is modeled after New York State's Child Health Plus (CHPlus) program. Since 1991, CHPlus has provided health insurance to children 0 to 13 years old whose annual family income was below 222% of the federal poverty level and who were ineligible for Medicaid or did not have equivalent health insurance coverage. CHPlus covered the costs for ambulatory, emergency, and specialty care, and prescriptions, but not inpatient services. OBJECTIVES: To assess the change associated with CHPlus regarding 1) access to health care; 2) utilization of ambulatory, inpatient, and emergency services; 3) quality of health care; and 4) health status. SETTING: Six western New York State counties (including the city of Rochester). SUBJECTS: Children (0-6.99 years old) enrolled for at least 9 consecutive months in CHPlus. METHODS: The design was a before-and-after study, comparing individual-level outcomes for the 12 months immediately before CHPlus enrollment and the 12 months immediately after enrollment in CHPlus. Parent telephone interviews and medical chart reviews conducted 12 months after enrollment to gather information. Subjects' primary care charts were located by using interview information; emergency department (ED) charts were identified by searching patient records at all 12 EDs serving children in the study; and health department charts were identified by searching patient records at the 6 county health department clinics. Logistic regression and Poisson regression were used to compare the means of dependent measures with and without CHPlus coverage, while controlling for age, prior insurance type, and gap in insurance coverage before CHPlus. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 1730 children. Coverage by CHPlus was associated with a significant improvement in access to care as measured by the proportion of children reported as having a usual source of care (preventive care: +1.9% improvement during CHPlus and sick care: +2. 7%). CHPlus was associated, among children 1 to 5 years old, with a significant increase in utilization of preventive care (+.23 visits/child/year) and sick care (+.91 visits/child/year) but no measurable change in utilization of specialty, emergency, or inpatient care. CHPlus was also associated, among children 1 to 5 years old, with significantly higher immunization rates (up-to-date for immunizations: 76% vs 71%), and screening rates for anemia (+11% increased proportion screened/year), lead (+9%), vision (+11%), and hearing (+7%). For 25% of the children, a parent reported that their child's health was improved as a result of having CHPlus. CONCLUSION: After enrollment in CHPlus, access to and utilization of primary care increased, continuity of care improved, and many quality of care measures were improved while utilization of emergency and specialty care did not change. Many parents reported improved health status of their child as a result of enrollment in CHPlus. Implication. This evaluation suggests that SCHIP programs are likely to improve access to, quality of, and participation in primary care significantly and may not be associated with significant changes in specialty or emergency care.

Child↗

Insurance benefits coverage for persons with spinal cord injuries: determining differences across payors.

This investigation represents a preliminary step in determining differences in benefits coverage among three types of rehabilitation insurance payors (Catastrophic payors, which include Automobile No-Fault and Workers' Disability Compensation; Medicaid; and Third-party private payors). Subjects in this study were 122 spinal cord injury (SCI) outpatients who received their initial rehabilitation at the University of Michigan Medical Center and at the Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan. Insurance benefits received by them were examined across the following areas: accessible housing, transportation, personal attendant care services, professional outpatient services and adapted equipment. Results indicated differences across the three payors, with catastrophically-sponsored SCI outpatients receiving more benefits than SCI outpatients sponsored by public Medicaid or by private third-party insurance. Implications and recommendations for further studies are briefly discussed.

Adult↗

Does competition by health maintenance organizations affect the adoption of cost-containment measures by fee-for-service plans?

How groups insured by fee-for-service health plans react to increased competition from health maintenance organizations (HMOs) is an unresolved question. We investigated whether groups insured by indemnity plans respond to HMO market competition by changing selected health insurance features, such as deductible amounts, stop loss levels, and coinsurance rates, or by adopting utilization management or preferred provider organization (PPO) benefit options. We collected benefit design data for the years 1985 through 1992 from 95 insured groups in 62 US metropolitan statistical areas. Multivariate hazard analysis showed that groups located in markets with higher rates of change in HMO enrollment were less likely to increase deductibles or stop loss levels. Groups located in markets with higher HMO enrollment were more likely to adopt utilization management or PPO benefit options. A group located in a market with an HMO penetration rate of 20% was 65% more likely to have included a PPO option as part of its insurance benefit plan than a group located in a market with an HMO penetration rate of 15% (p < 0.05). Concern about possible adverse selection effects may deter some fee-for-service groups from changing their health insurance coverage. Under some conditions, however, groups insured under fee-for-service plans do respond to managed care competition by changing their insurance benefits to achieve greater cost containment.

Cost Control↗