Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Traumatic pneumomediastinum in a child secondary to corn chip perforation of the esophagus.

Esophageal perforations, while an infrequent form of trauma in the pediatric population, are of concern because of their life-threatening complications. If not recognized and treated promptly, esophageal injuries can result in mediastinitis and death. An unusual case is presented, describing traumatic esophageal perforation in a child resulting from laceration by an ingested corn chip. A study is reported investigating the rigidity of three types of these popular snack chips. Stress testing and statistical analysis of the resultant measurement data indicated that the three brands of chips were equally rigid. The mean force of compression required to fracture the chips was approximately three pounds, a force great enough to damage the fragile structures of the upper aerodigestive system. Physicians and parents alike should be aware of the possible dangers of this type of snack food to avert the possibility of esophageal injury with its resultant morbidity and potential mortality.

Child↗
PubMed2006

Fatal massive hemorrhage caused by nasogastric tube misplacement in a patient with mediastinitis.

Nasogastric tube insertion is a routine procedure in medical care. However, misplacement of the tube can cause a variety of complications, which can be life threatening in some instances. We report a case of fatal hemorrhagic shock immediately after nasogastric tube insertion in a patient undergoing debridement by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinitis. Emergency endoscopy showed that the bleeding came from the nasogastric tube which had perforated the esophagus and possibly tore an intrathoracic large vessel. The nasogastric tube insertion was considered to have directly produced the perforation because no esophageal perforation had been found on preoperative endoscopy. Factors contributing to the risk of esophageal perforation in this case included coexisting mediastinitis, surgical manipulation, endotracheal intubation, inability to cooperate during general anesthesia, and repetitive advancement of the nasogastric tube. Prompt clamping of the nasogastric tube or delayed insertion after failed attempts might have improved the outcome. This report illustrates the complication of massive bleeding that can occur immediately after misplaced insertion of a nasogastric tube. Extraordinary care should be taken to avoid misplacement of the nasogastric tube during insertion.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Esophagectomy for esophageal disruption.

When esophageal disruption occurs in the presence of preexisting esophageal disease or is associated with sepsis or fluid and electrolyte imbalance, aggressive and definitive therapy often provides the only chance for patient salvage. Twenty-four adults (average age, 59 years) with intrathoracic esophageal perforations underwent esophagectomy: 15, transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy; and 9, transthoracic esophagectomy. Restoration of alimentary continuity with an immediate cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was carried out in 13 patients. Eleven underwent a cervical or anterior thoracic esophagostomy, and 10 of them had a subsequent colonic (7) or gastric (3) interposition from 4 to 32 weeks (average time, 8.6 weeks) later. The perforations were due to esophageal instrumentation (9 patients), acute caustic ingestion (2), emesis (2), intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic disruption (2), and other causes (9). Preexisting esophageal disease in 20 patients included chronic strictures (10 patients), reflux esophagitis (3), esophageal cancer (3), achalasia (2), diffuse spasm (2), and monilial esophagitis (1 patient). Ten patients were operated on within 12 hours after the injury; 3, within 12 to 24 hours; and 11, within three to 45 days (average interval, 6.6 days). There were three hospital deaths (13%). Nineteen of the 21 survivors were able to swallow comfortably until the time of death or latest follow-up. Aggressive diagnosis and aggressive treatment of life-threatening esophageal perforations are advocated. Conservative procedures (repair, diversion, or drainage) for a perforation with preexisting esophageal disease often inflict more morbidity than esophageal resection, which eliminates the perforation, the source of sepsis, and the underlying esophageal disease. The decision to restore alimentary continuity in a single stage must be individualized.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Perforation of esophagus after endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. Incidence and clues to pathogenesis.

To determine the true incidence of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS)-related esophageal perforation, a retrospective analysis of 900 EVS procedures using sodium tetradecyl sulfate performed on 170 patients during a five-year period (1980-1985) was carried out. Autopsy data of all patients who received EVS and who died (32 patients, 100%) during this period were available to confirm the diagnosis of perforation. Esophageal perforation was confirmed in 5 (2.9%) and was seen in patients with advanced alcoholic liver disease. Importantly, most patients did not manifest features of an esophageal leak, but presented instead as a deterioration in condition and died after a mean (+/- SD) 14 +/- 5.2 days. Analysis of the clinical and EVS data reveals that the risk of developing perforation is high when EVS is performed during active bleeding. The extravariceal location of sclerosant and microabscesses may be important predisposing factors. In our experience large-dose injection, deep ulceration, and balloon tamponade are less likely predisposing factors of this complication.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Surgical treatment of iatrogenic perforations of the distal third of the esophagus. Personal experience].

AIM: The esophageal perforations are associated with a high mortality and morbidity when they are not diagnosed and treated quickly. The aim of our study is to analyze the treatment and prognosis of the distal iatrogenic esophageal perforations on the basis of time of onset, concomitant disease and size of perforations. METHODS: The retrospective review was performed on 10 patients treated for distal iatrogenic esophageal perforations at our Institution from 1994 to 2003. The cause of perforations was: pneumatic dilation (7 patients) and esophageal endoprosthesis placing (3 patients). Seven patients presented within 24 h (Group A), and 3 patients presented after 24 h (Group B). In Group A, 4 patients underwent primary repair, 2 patients required esophagectomy and 1 patient was treated conservatively. In Group B, 2 patients were treated conservatively and 1 patient required an esophagectomy. RESULTS: Hospital morbidity was 20% and mortality was 30%. In Group A no patients died. In Group B hospital mortality was 100%. The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure resulting from sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for esophageal perforations is influenced by the time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment. Esophagectomy is indicated for patients with extensive perforation and necrosis of the esophagus when primary repair cannot be carried out. It is indicated also as treatment for the concomitant disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Case report: right subclavian artery pseudoaneurysm due to perforation of esophageal cancer.

A 51-year-old man presented with massive hematemesis. Perforation of upper esophageal cancer, which had already occurred at least six days earlier, progressed to upper mediastinitis. The mediastinitis contiguous to the right subclavian artery was considered to have caused a pseudoaneurysm. Rupture of the pseudoaneurysm into the esophagus resulted in massive hematemesis. Both enhanced computed tomography and angiography were diagnostic for the pseudoaneurysm. Transluminal endovascular stent-grafts placement was successful in preventing subsequent hemorrhage.

Aneurysm, False↗
PubMed1985

[Esophagus perforation--treatment and results].

Esophageal perforation is most often caused by instrumental lesion during endoscopy. Mortality is still high; underlying malignant disease, septic complications and cardiopulmonary problems are endangering the patient. In small perforation with poor clinical symptoms, conservative treatment (i.e. antibiotics, gastric suction, parenteral nutrition) should be considered. We could treat in this way more than 50% of our cases. On the other hand, some patients require agressive surgical procedures, e.g. cervical esophagostomy gastrostomy and disconnection of esophageal continuity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Iatrogenic perforation of the esophagus by a nasogastric tube.

An unusual case of esophageal perforation by nasogastric tube placement has been presented. Clinical suspicion plus radiologic confirmation of esophageal perforation resulted in prompt surgical intervention with drainage of the contaminated area. The best prognosticator for the successful outcome in the treatment of esophageal perforation is early recognition of the problem.

Esophageal Perforation↗
PubMed1976

Esophageal obturator airway: use and complications.

The esophageal obturator airway, in lieu of placement of an endotracheal tube, has been found to be an effective and reliably safe means of providing an artificial airway. By occluding the esophagus, it prevents gastric dilatation and aspiration. However, it is not totally without hazard. Two cases of pharyngoesophageal trauma are reported: a high esophageal tear found at post mortem examination and a pyriform sinus laceration noted on admission to the hospital. The authors recommend conservative treatment for cervical esophageal perforations and surgery for thoracic esophageal perforations. Despite these complications, the authors feel the esophageal obturator airway is safe and effective for use by those unskilled in direct endotracheal intubation when participating in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Esophageal injuries].

Despite progress in the management of esophageal perforations by early diagnosis, antibiotics, monitoring, and respiratory and nutritional support, it still remains as a disasterous condition. The most common cause of esophageal perforation is iatrogenic disruption. The result in the management of esophageal perforation is influenced by several factors: localization and size of the rupture, length of delay in diagnosis, age, extent of mediastinal and pleural contamination, the presence of underlying esophageal diseases, and inflammation or tumor at the perforation localization. In this study, 7 cases of esophageal perforations in the last six years have been analysed retrospectively. In study group, there were 5 males and 2 females, and the mean age was 36 (12-75). The most common cause of perforation was gunshot injury (3 cases), and stab wound (1 case), foreign body (1 case), iatrogenic distruption (2 cases). Three patients died and four patients were discharged from hospital with recovery. Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and repair reduces the morbidity and mortality.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Mediastinitis associated with foreign body erosion of the esophagus in children.

OBJECTIVE: Timely and experienced intervention for esophageal foreign bodies generally allows for removal with minimal morbidity. However, esophageal foreign bodies present a risk for esophageal perforation and subsequent mediastinitis, especially if the diagnosis of the foreign body is delayed. Although much has been written about the management of esophageal foreign bodies and their complications, little has been mentioned in recent literature about the specific complication of mediastinitis. This review was performed to examine our experience with this uncommon complication of esophageal foreign bodies. METHODS: A retrospective review of the esophageal foreign body database at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin from 1987 to 1997 was performed to identify patients with esophageal foreign bodies and subsequent mediastinitis. RESULTS: Four patients with esophageal perforation with associated mediastinitis secondary to retained esophageal foreign bodies were identified. Three of the four patients were treated with conservative measures consisting of foreign body removal, intravenous antibiotics and discontinuing of oral nutrition. These patients all achieved resolution of their mediastinitis and esophageal perforation with subsequent return to normal diets and no significant morbidity. One patient, with vascular erosion, required aggressive, invasive therapy. CONCLUSION: From review of this limited number of patients, in the absence of major vascular erosion, conservative methods of treating children with foreign body esophageal perforation and subsequent mediastinitis appears to be effective.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1992

Management of diffuse esophageal spasm with balloon dilatation.

Of 1200 patients referred to the esophageal laboratory at Guy's Hospital for investigation of suspected esophageal motility disorders, 61 (5.1%) were diagnosed as diffuse esophageal spasm. Twenty of these patients whose symptoms were severe did not respond to conservative treatment and were treated by balloon dilatation. Results were good in 14 and poor in six patients, which included one esophageal perforation. Diffuse esophageal spasm was diagnosed where more than 30% nonperistaltic activity was demonstrated by manometry. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and relaxation were normal in all cases except one. Gastroesophageal reflux was present in four of five poor responders who were examined by 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring, and in only one of 10 good responders. Three of the six patients in whom balloon dilatation was successful proceeded to full-length myotomy, with relief of symptoms in two. The indications for, and results of, balloon dilatation in this condition are discussed, and a new radiological sign is described.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Synchronous herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus esophagitis.

Infective esophagitis is a rare disease, affecting mostly immunocompromised patients. Very few cases of a multiple viral infection have been reported. We present a case of combined cytomegalovirus (CMV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) esophagitis in an 81-year-old female with extracapillary sclerosing glomerulonephritis treated for five months with steroids and chemotherapy. She died of septic shock. At autopsy, erosive and ulcerative esophagitis was found in the distal half of the esophagus. Slides were stained by HE, and the immunohistochemical avidin-biotin method was used to detect HSV and CMV infection. On histological examination of the esophagus, epithelial giant cells with intranuclear viral inclusions showing HSV immunopositivity were found at the margin of the ulcerations. Giant cells with intranuclear inclusions with CMV immunopositivity were also found in the mesenchymal cells obtained from the ulcer bed. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy provoked an immune deficiency, evidenced by grave leukopenia and depletion of all bone marrow elements. Diagnosis of HSV and CMV esophagitis is important to evaluate the risk of hemorrhage and esophageal perforation in esophagitis.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Percutaneous drainage of chest abscesses in children.

Seven patients ranging in age from 3 to 18 years underwent percutaneous drainage of eight intrathoracic abscesses. Five of the abscesses were mediastinal or paramediastinal and resulted from esophageal perforation or esophageal anastomotic leakage. The abscesses resolved in each case, with a mean catheter drainage time of 28 days and no need for surgical intervention. Three of the abscesses were intrapulmonary, and each lay adjacent to a pleural surface. All three lung abscesses resolved within 19-24 days, without thoracotomy or wedge resection.

Abscess↗
PubMed1992

Comparative effects of 5% ethanolamine oleate versus 5% ethanolamine oleate plus 1% polidocanol for sclerosing esophageal varices.

Sixty-six patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis were randomized to receive either 5% ethanolamine oleate (EO) or 5% EO plus 1% polidocanol (EOP) as a sclerosant for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS). The two groups were well matched with regard to age, sex and the severity of liver disease. In no patient in the two groups was there any major complication, such as esophageal perforation or esophageal bleeding. Eradication of esophageal varices was attained with an average of 4.7 and 4.3 sessions of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in the ethanolamine oleate and polidocanol groups, respectively. Data on one patient in the ethanolamine oleate group had to be excluded because he left the hospital after 2 sessions of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. Esophageal ulcers occurred earlier in the polidocanol group (after an average of 2.8 weeks) than in the ethanolamine oleate group (3.8 weeks), the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01). The rate of occurrence of esophageal stricture requiring more than 2 sessions of bougienage was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the polidocanol group (16/33, 48%) than in the ethanolamine oleate group (4/32, 12%). This study suggests that the two sclerosants have equal efficacy for treating patients with esophageal varices. With polidocanol there was ulceration and stricture in the distal esophagus.

Drug Combinations↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Perforation of the esophagus during pneumatic dilatation in achalasia].

Esophageal perforation is a serious complication of pneumatic dilatation. We studied the cases of 4 patients (2 men and 2 women, mean age 58 years, range 56-62) who had surgical treatment for achalasia, two of which had had previous dilatation. The main symptoms were pain and dyspnea. Pneumomediastinum was present in all patients, pleural effusion in 2 and cervical emphysema in 1. Esophagographic results showed evidence of perforation in all four cases and gastric patches were surgically placed on the esophageal tear within 12 hours. Three patients received enteral nutrition for an average of 13 days. Mean hospital stay was 14 days. No post-operative complications were exhibited although one patient did develop gastroesophageal reflux 3 months later and underwent surgery to repair a hernia in the thorax 5 years later. Early and aggressive treatment is considered the best therapy and the gastric patch, in our opinion, is an effective and reliable technique for esophageal perforation repair in achalasia patients.

Dilatation↗