Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defibrillators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Efficacy of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in prolonging survival in patients with severe underlying cardiac disease.

The ability of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to prolong overall survival, particularly in patients with significantly depressed cardiac function, has not been well documented. Of 119 patients who received the implantable defibrillator in this institution, 40 had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% (Group A) and 79 had an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30% (Group B). For each group, cumulative survival was compared with the projected survival if the implantable defibrillator had not been used. Projected survival was based on the assumption that the first appropriate shock would have resulted in death without the defibrillator. For Group A, the 3 year cumulative survival rate was 67 +/- 12% versus a projected survival rate of 6 +/- 15% (p less than 0.001). For Group B, the 3 year cumulative survival rate was 96 +/- 3% versus a projected survival rate of 46 +/- 8% (p less than 0.001). Both the cumulative and projected survival rates for patients in Group A were significantly worse than for patients in Group B (p less than 0.01). The projected survival rates for both Groups A and B were comparable with the observed survival rate in similar patients treated without the implantable defibrillator. In summary, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator significantly prolonged overall survival, even in patients with poor cardiac function. The technique of estimating projected survival appears to allow a realistic estimate of the reduction in mortality achieved by the defibrillator.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Emergency intracardiac defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation during routine electrophysiologic study.

Ventricular fibrillation refractory to cardiopulmonary resuscitation including multiple transthoracic defibrillations occurred in four patients during 1,215 consecutive ventricular tachycardia induction studies. A technique of emergency intracardiac defibrillation for management of refractory ventricular fibrillation is described. In four patients, stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (320 to 570 ms cycle length) was induced during the study and overdrive ventricular pacing resulted in ventricular fibrillation. These patients did not respond to prompt transthoracic defibrillations (5 to 15 attempts/patient) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including antiarrhythmic therapy. As a last resort, intracardiac defibrillation was performed with use of a previously inserted standard right ventricular quadripolar catheter as cathode and a posterior skin patch as anode. High energy intracardiac defibrillation pulses (100 to 500 J) delivered from a standard defibrillator successfully terminated each arrhythmia. Intracardiac defibrillation is technically simple and appears effective in terminating refractory ventricular fibrillation in the electrophysiology laboratory. However, further research is necessary to determine the safety and efficacy of this technique, as well as potential applications in other emergency settings.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of defibrillation probability of success curves for an endocardial lead configuration with and without an inactive epicardial patch.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the effect of passive "bystander" epicardial electrodes on defibrillation efficacy. BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that an inactive epicardial patch placed in an area of low potential gradient from an endocardial electrode shock might affect defibrillation efficacy through its effects on the shock field and the underlying potential gradient. METHODS: We studied the effects of an inactive 18-cm2 titanium mesh patch placed on the anterolateral left ventricular epicardium on the 50% probability of successful defibrillation. A biphasic shock with both phases 6 ms in duration was delivered between superior vena cava and right ventricular catheter electrodes 10 s after the electrical induction of ventricular fibrillation. Six dogs underwent an up/down defibrillation protocol randomized with or without the patch on the heart. RESULTS: Mean 50% (+/-) probability point for energy doubled with the conductive patch on the heart, from 8.0 +/- 3.2 to 16.8 +/- 7.0 J (p < 0.01), and leading-edge voltage increased from 334 +/- 64 to 477 +/- 98 V (p < 0.01). Mean 50% probability points for energy and leading-edge voltage were not significantly changed when the procedure was repeated using a nonconductive patch in another six dogs as a control group. In a saline-saturated foam model, measurements from electrodes placed around and under the patch revealed a 72% mean decrease in the potential gradient in the foam under the conductive patch. CONCLUSIONS: A passive defibrillator patch can markedly increase the energy requirements for defibrillation, probably by decreasing the potential gradient under the patch. These results suggest the use of caution when passive electrodes are present, for example, when a patient receives a nonthoracotomy defibrillator system while epicardial electrodes from a previously implanted system are left in place.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Epicardial versus parietal pericardial defibrillation.

This study evaluated the energy requirements for porous electrodes implanted on the parietal pericardium versus those for porous electrodes implanted on the epicardial surface of the heart. Defibrillation with a 2.5-cm porous electrode implanted on the parietal pericardium was successful in 42% of all episodes of ventricular fibrillation. The minimal energy requirement ranged from 30-68 J, with an average of 46 J. Epicardial defibrillation was successful in approximately 80% of all episodes. The average maximal energy was 21.3 J. There was histological evidence of subepicardial damage in the parietal defibrillation group. This may be related to the higher energy required to defibrillate in this group. However, in this group frequent, large, external shocks were required to defibrillate the dogs' hearts. Theoretically, there may be some physiological and surgical advantages to an intact pericardium. However, the high energy requirement and the low success rate for defibrillation with a porous electrode on the parietal pericardium negate the feasibility of this route of defibrillation with a permanent implantable system.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of defibrillation is controversial. Reentry appearing immediately after the shock has been shown to be responsible for defibrillation failure in some studies while other studies have demonstrated that a rapid train of focal activations with the first focus appearing >50 ms after the shock is responsible for failed defibrillation. We tested the hypothesis that both patterns can occur, but at different shock strengths. METHODS AND RESULTS: Biphasic 6/4 ms shocks of 100-900 V in 100-V increments were given after 10 s of ventricular fibrillation from electrodes in right ventricular apex and right atrium in five isolated pig hearts. Transmembrane activity was optically mapped from the anterior and posterior epicardium using two CCD cameras. The defibrillation threshold (DFT) was 786+/-199 V. The interval from the shock to the earliest post-shock activation was zero for shocks <400 V but increased with increasing shock voltage to 62+/-6 ms at 800 V. The number of post-shock phase singularities, which is related to reentry incidence, decreased continuously from pre-shock values for 100-V shocks to zero as the shock strength increased to 600 V. Focal activations were observed after shocks >600 V with no epicardial reentry present. CONCLUSION: Reentry is responsible for defibrillation failure for low-strength shocks. As the shock strength approaches the DFT, a focal epicardial activation pattern becomes responsible for failed defibrillation. Thus, the mechanism of defibrillation failure depends on shock strength, with focal activation as the mechanism for the clinically important near-DFT strength shocks.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

A program encouraging early defibrillation results in improved in-hospital resuscitation efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether survival to discharge after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest could be improved by a program encouraging early defibrillation that included switching from monophasic to biphasic devices. BACKGROUND: In-hospital resuscitation continues to have a low success rate. Biphasic waveform devices have demonstrated characteristics that might improve survival, and outside the hospital, automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have shown promise in improving survival of patients suffering cardiopulmonary arrest. METHODS: A program including education and replacement of all manual monophasic defibrillators with a combination of manual biphasic defibrillators used in AED mode and AEDs in all outpatient clinics and chronic care units was implemented. RESULTS: With program implementation, the percentage survival of all patients with resuscitation events improved 2.6-fold, from 4.9% to 12.8%. Factors independently predicting survival included event location outside an intensive care unit, younger age, an initial rhythm of pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), pre-arrest beta-blocker, and program initiation. The outcome was independent of gender, race, work shift, number of previous resuscitation attempts, body mass index, comorbidity index, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, or use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The improvement in mortality was attributable solely to an effect on patients presenting with VT/VF. Patients with these initial rhythms were 14-fold (odds ratio = 0.07 of death, confidence interval = 0.02 to 0.3) more likely to survive to discharge after program initiation. Automated external defibrillators performed similarly to biphasic manual defibrillators in AED mode. CONCLUSIONS: A program including education and use of biphasic manual defibrillators in AED mode and selective use of AEDs improved survival to discharge in hospitalized patients suffering from cardiopulmonary arrest.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

In hospital cardiac arrest: a role for automatic defibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) survival decreases by 10% for each minute of delay in defibrillation, however, survival rates of 98% can be achieved when defibrillation is accomplished within 30s of collapse. Recently, a fully automated external cardioverter-defibrillator (AECD) was approved by the FDA for in-hospital use. The AECD can be programmed to automatically defibrillate when a life threatening ventricular arrhythmia occurs. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential impact of in-hospital AECDs on the critical time to defibrillation in monitored hospital units. METHODS: Mock emergency (n = 18) were conducted using simulated ventricular fibrillation in various monitored units. Observers were stationed to record the time staff responded to the arrhythmia, and the time to shock. These times were compared to an AECD protocol that defibrillates automatically in an average of 38.3 s from onset of arrhythmia (n = 18). RESULTS: Staff versus AECD response time to arrhythmia (s) was 76.3 +/- 113.7 (CI 19.8-132.8) versus 7.6 +/- 0.6 (CI 7.3-7.9). Staff versus AECD time to shock was 169.2 +/- 103.1 (CI 117.9-220.4) versus 38.3 +/- 0.7 (CI 37.9-38.6). P-values are <0.0001 for differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of AECDs on monitored units would significantly reduce the critical time to defibrillation in patients with SCA. We anticipate this would translate to improved survival rates, and better neurologic outcomes.

Electric Countershock↗
PubMed1980

Bipolar catheter defibrillation in dogs using trapezoidal waveforms of various tilts.

The choice of defibrillating waveform is critical in determining the size, battery life, and effectiveness of an automatic implantable defibrillator (AID). The trapezoidal (truncated exponential) waveform is well suited for the AID and its use can be optimized by the selection of appropriate values of pulse duration and tilt. The purpose of this study was to determine the dependence of the threshold peak current (the minimum peak current necessary to defibrillate the ventricles) on pulse duration and tilt for a bipolar catheter electrode configuration. Successive fibrillation-defibrillation trials were performed in 30 dogs anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg). The defibrillating pulse was applied via a bipolar-electrode catheter positioned such that the electrodes were located in the right ventricle at the apex and in the superior vena cava. The threshold peak current was determined in each dog for trapezoidal waveforms with 80%, 65%, 50%, and less than 5% tilt and with pulse durations of 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 milliseconds. From a total of 600 threshold peak-current values, a strength-duration curve was derived for each value of tilt. The threshold peak current dose (peak current divided by body weight) increased with increasing tilt and decreasing duration. The threshold average current dose (average current over the duration of the defibrillating pulse divided by body weight) was IAV = 0.26 + 0.47/d, where d is the pulse duration in milliseconds and IAV is the average current in amperes per kilogram. If catheter apparent impedance is known, the minimum capacitance and output voltage necessary for defibrillation can be inferred from the strength-duration curves. From these data one can quantitatively assess the effect of trapezoidal waveform shape on the design criteria for the AID.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Successful atrial defibrillation with very-low-energy shocks by means of temporary epicardial wire electrodes.

Sustained atrial fibrillation is very common after cardiac surgical procedures. We hypothesized that atrial defibrillation could be accomplished consistently and safely by means of low-energy shocks delivered by temporary stainless steel wire electrodes placed at the time of the operation. Sterile pericarditis was created in five mongrel dogs (20.9 +/- 2.1 kg), and pairs of standard temporary stainless steel wire electrodes were placed on the right atrial appendage, on Bachmann's bundle, and on the right ventricular apex for pacing, sensing, and recording. Temporary stainless steel wire electrodes, insulated except for the distal 6 cm and used to deliver defibrillation shocks, were placed adjacent to both atrial free walls and secured to the pericardium. All electrodes were brought out through the skin, and the sternotomy was closed. Dogs were tested in the conscious state on postoperative day 2. Sustained atrial fibrillation was induced by rapid atrial pacing. A customized software program was used to control the defibrillator, which delivered R wave-synchronous biphasic shocks to the atria through the temporary defibrillation electrodes. The shock intensity began at 50 volts and was increased by 10-volt increments until atrial fibrillation was terminated. Atrial fibrillation was terminated in all dogs at 112 +/- 7 volts, with an energy of 0.42 +/- 0.07 joule and an impedance of 67.8 +/- 4 ohms (all values mean +/- standard error of the mean). The mean percent success for atrial defibrillation at this minimal threshold was 49%. Thus at low-threshold voltages atrial fibrillation could be terminated with every other shock. A 25% increase in the minimal threshold voltage improved the conversion rate to 73% (mean energy 0.66 +/- 0.19 joule and mean impedance of 67 +/- 3.8 ohms). No complications were detected with the use of the electrodes or after their removal on the seventh postoperative day. One instance of electrode migration on the right atrial free wall was detected by roentgenography, but this did not adversely affect atrial defibrillation threshold. No ventricular arrhythmias or hemodynamic complications were noted during shock delivery. We conclude that successful conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm can be achieved consistently with shock energies below 0.5 joule delivered with temporary epicardial defibrillation wire electrodes in this canine pericarditis model. These results suggest that this approach to the management of sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias has considerable promise in the management of atrial fibrillation in patients who have had cardiac operations.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Effect of fire department first-responder automated defibrillation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of fire department first-responder defibrillation on time to defibrillation in a mid-sized community with two tiers of emergency medical services (EMS) ambulance response. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: The study area was the region of Hamilton-Wentworth, which has more than 445,000 inhabitants and covers 1,136 km2 (438 square miles). TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: We studied 297 victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting to the EMS system between May 1, 1990, and April 30, 1991. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean defibrillation interval was decreased from 11.96 minutes to 8.50 minutes (P < .001) by the introduction of fire first-responder defibrillation. Survival was significantly greater with bystander-witnessed arrest, initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation, and presence of a pulse on arrival in the emergency department. CONCLUSION: In our EMS system, fire first-responders were able to provide defibrillation in significantly shorter times than ambulance attendants. Other EMS systems should review their response times and consider instituting first-responder defibrillation as one means of reducing defibrillation intervals.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Reliability of ECG monitoring with a gel pad/paddle combination after defibrillation.

Recent warnings have highlighted the possibility of unreliable monitoring through gel pads and paddles when using manual defibrillators. Occasionally, this causes an apparent asystole to be displayed when the true rhythm is ventricular fibrillation. We investigated this phenomenon in the laboratory using defibrillator-testing devices with two different impedances and with two defibrillators (Physio-Control LIFEPAK 9 and Hewlett Packard XL). After delivery of a 200 J shock, the time taken for the original ECG test signal to return to the defibrillator monitor was measured. Measurements were made after each of a series of ten shocks delivered with each defibrillator and gel pad/ testing device combination. Additional measurements were made using self-adhesive combination defibrillator electrodes. When using a low-impedance testing device with gel pads, on all occasions the initial rhythm reappeared immediately. When using the high-impedance testing device, the post shock rhythm was initially displayed as 'no signal' (Hewlett Packard XL) or 'asystole' (Physio-Control LIFEPAK 9). Over the series of ten shocks, the time to return of the original signal ranged between 24 and 154 s with the Hewlett Packard and 17-61 s with the Physio-Control LIFEPAK 9. The time for return of the signal increased with successive shocks. When using Fast-Patch electrodes, the original test signal always returned immediately. We conclude that after the delivery of a shock, monitoring through gel pads may result in the display of spurious asystole being displayed. This is more likely to occur in the presence of high chest impedance and with an increasing number of shocks delivered through the same gel pads. If defibrillator paddles and gel pads have been used for 'quick-look' monitoring, and 'asystole' is displayed after delivery of a shock, the rhythm should be confirmed immediately with monitoring leads.

Electric Countershock↗
PubMed2000

Early defibrillation and the chain of survival in 'in-hospital' adult cardiac arrest; minutes count.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes from and the impact of the chain of survival in 'in-hospital' cardiac arrest where the presenting rhythm was VF/VT, the arrest was witnessed, defibrillation was conducted rapidly and no other resuscitation interventions were required. OUTCOME MEASURES: Any return of spontaneous circulation and discharge from hospital. METHODS: A 2-year prospective resuscitation audit using the Utstein style was conducted within a major London NHS Hospital Group. RESULTS: There were 124 patients who had primary VF/VT arrest. Eight were excluded from the study and 14 had non-witnessed cardiac arrest. Twenty one patients had witnessed VF/VT arrest but with delayed defibrillation, 81 patients had witnessed VF/VT arrest with rapid defibrillation, 69 patients had witnessed VF/VT arrest with rapid defibrillation, CPR and other additional interventions. There were 15 patients that had witnessed cardiac arrest with a presenting rhythm of VF/VT, who received rapid defibrillation and had no ventilation or chest compression prior to or following defibrillation. All 15 patients achieved a return of spontaneous circulation, and 12 were discharged alive. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid defibrillation prior to any other resuscitation intervention is associated with increased survival from witnessed VF/VT arrest in in-hospital cardiac arrest victims, and that the time to first shock is critical in enhancing the prospects of long-term survival in these patients.

Blood Circulation↗
PubMed2002

Influence of early defibrillation on the survival rate and quality of life after CPR in prehospital emergency medical service in a German metropolitan area.

Early defibrillation by emergency medical personnel has been shown to improve survival in patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation. Due to organisational differences it is difficult to compare results in various studies. Comparison of studies has been simplified by introduction of the Utstein template. After introduction of an early defibrillation program in Hamburg, we compared the patients being treated with early defibrillation by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) with patients being defibrillated by physicians in an out-of-hospital emergency service in a prospective study. All patients suffered from non EMT-witnessed ventricular fibrillation of cardiac origin. During 1 year, 103 patients were analyzed with respect to survival rate and quality of life. Of the 53 patients in the early defibrillation group (G1) 11 regained a palpable pulse at physicians' arrival, whereas all patients of the control group (G2) showed ventricular fibrillation. More patients treated with early defibrillation regained sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmics in the prehospital phase (G1: n=43 (86%); G2: n=32 (60%); P<0.05) and had a shorter in-hospital stay (G1: median, 23 days; range 5-51 days; G2: median 39, range 15-88 days; P<0.05). Twelve patients in G1 and 16 in G2 were discharged from hospital. The survival rate was similar in both groups (after 6 months G1: n=12; G2: n=14, after 12 months G1: n=10; G2: n=13 and after 24 months G1: n=9; G2: n=10), and the quality of life according to Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) and Overall Performance Category (OPC) scores also was comparable between groups. We conclude that early defibrillation provides a higher incidence of return of a spontaneous circulation, a reduced need for antiarrhythmics and shorter in-hospital treatment times in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Public access defibrillation in Helsinki--costs and potential benefits from a community-based pilot study.

In cardiac arrest the interval between the collapse and defibrillation may be shortened by teaching lay people to use defibrillators. We conducted a 3-year prospective, community-based study on public access defibrillation (PAD) in an urban emergency medical services system. All public sites with a cardiac arrest incidence of at least one per year were equipped with automated external defibrillators. Twenty cardiac arrest patients were enrolled, seven in PAD and 13 in control group. Defibrillation was accomplished significantly earlier (P=0.01) in the PAD group. The direct costs were 110,270 Eur and only 13.5-16% of this figure would be related to the cost of defibrillators during their 8 years lifespan. This study showed that a community based model of PAD shortens the time to CPR and defibrillation significantly in an urban environment but various challenges have to be solved before wider implementation of PAD. In future projects the nature of the costs especially should be considered.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Successful automatic external defibrillator operation by people trained only in basic life support in a simulated cardiac arrest situation.

OBJECTIVE: To show whether in an in-hospital cardiac arrest, early defibrillation can also be performed by hospital staff trained only in basic life support. BACKGROUND: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) endorses the concept that in many settings non-medical individuals should be allowed and encouraged to use defibrillators. METHODS: Five different groups of hospital staff were evaluated whether they were able to correctly operate an automatic external defibrillator in a simulated sudden cardiac arrest situation without any prior instruction. The participants were assigned either to the 'basic life support-trained' group (BLS, n = 40, or to the 'advanced life support-trained' group (ALS, n = 40). RESULTS: All persons of the 'only BLS-trained' group delivered the three sequential ('stacked') shocks with the automatic external defibrillator when persistent ventricular fibrillation was simulated. The 'ALS-trained' persons successfully delivered the three shocks with the automatic external defibrillator in 98% of the cases. When this group used a conventional defibrillator, only 88% were able to deliver the three shocks, however they were able to do it significantly more quickly. CONCLUSION: Using an automatic defibrillator without any prior instruction, even persons trained only in BLS were able to deliver three sequential shocks in a simulated persistent ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Lidocaine causes a reversible, concentration-dependent increase in defibrillation energy requirements.

To investigate the influence of lidocaine on the energy requirements for internal defibrillation, lidocaine (n = 8) or saline solution (n = 12) was administered by intravenous infusion to 20 pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs, and the likelihood of successful defibrillation was examined at various shock energy levels before and after treatment. After lidocaine administration to a mean steady state concentration of 5.6 +/- 2.7 micrograms/ml, the mean energy required to achieve 50 and 90% success in defibrillation (E50 and E90) increased by 61.1 +/- 34.1% (mean +/- SD, p less than 0.005) and 47.1 +/- 28.6% (p less than 0.005), respectively. The steady state log lidocaine concentration correlated positively with the observed increase in E50 (r = 0.887, p less than 0.01) over a concentration range from 1.95 to 9.8 micrograms/ml. In a related experiment, lidocaine infusion was administered to five dogs and then abruptly discontinued. At energy levels achieving a mean 90.0 +/- 10.0% success in defibrillation before treatment, only 43.3 +/- 23.4% success was achieved after 60 minutes of the lidocaine infusion (p less than 0.01) at a mean plasma concentration of 8.4 +/- 2.1 micrograms/ml. The percent of successful defibrillations returned to baseline value (92.0 +/- 18.0%, p less than 0.01) after drug washout at a time when mean lidocaine concentration had declined to 1.8 +/- 0.5 microgram/ml. Lidocaine causes a reversible, concentration-dependent increase in the energy requirements for successful defibrillation; recommendations to administer lidocaine to patients with ventricular fibrillation resistant to defibrillation may need to be reviewed.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare defibrillation thresholds with lead systems consisting of an active left pectoral electrode and either single or dual transvenous coils. BACKGROUND: Lead systems that include an active pectoral pulse generator reduce defibrillation thresholds and permit transvenous defibrillation in nearly all patients. A further improvement in defibrillation efficacy is desirable to allow for smaller pulse generators with a reduced maximal output. METHODS: This prospective study was performed in 50 consecutive patients. Each patient was evaluated with two lead configurations with the order of testing randomized. Shocks were delivered between the right ventricular coil and either an active can alone (single coil) or an active can with the proximal atrial coil (dual coil). The right ventricular coil was the cathode for the first phase of the biphasic defibrillation waveform. RESULTS: Delivered energy at the defibrillation threshold was 10.1+/-5.0 J for the single-coil configuration and 8.7+/-4.0 J for the dual-coil configuration (p < 0.02). Moreover, 98% of patients had low (<15 J) thresholds with the dual-coil lead system, compared with 88% of patients with the single-coil configuration (p=0.05). Leading edge voltage (p < 0.001) and shock impedance (p < 0.001) were also decreased with the dual-coil configuration, although peak current was increased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A dual-coil, active pectoral lead system reduces defibrillation energy requirements compared with a single-coil, unipolar configuration.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. ZOLL Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform, consisting of a constant current first phase, with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform during transthoracic defibrillation. BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown that for endocardial defibrillation, biphasic waveforms have a greater efficacy than monophasic waveforms. More recently, a 130-J truncated exponential biphasic waveform was shown to have equivalent efficacy to a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. However, the optimal type of biphasic waveform is unknown. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, 184 patients who underwent ventricular defibrillation were randomized to receive a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic or 120-J rectilinear biphasic shock. RESULTS: First-shock efficacy of the biphasic waveform was significantly greater than that of the monophasic waveform (99% vs. 93%, p = 0.05) and was achieved with nearly 60% less delivered current (14 +/- 1 vs. 33 +/- 7 A, p < 0.0001). Although the efficacy of the biphasic and monophasic waveforms was comparable in patients with an impedance < 70 ohms (100% [biphasic] vs. 95% [monophasic], p = NS), the biphasic waveform was significantly more effective in patients with an impedance > or = 70 ohms (99% [biphasic] vs. 86% [monophasic], p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a superior efficacy of rectilinear biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation, particularly in patients with a high transthoracic impedance. More important, biphasic shocks defibrillated with nearly 60% less current. The combination of increased efficacy and decreased current requirements suggests that biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks are advantageous for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation.

Aged↗