Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DNA replication”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Influence of a replication enhancer on the hierarchy of origin efficiencies within a cluster of DNA replication origins.

DNA replication origins in animal cells sometimes occur in clusters. Often one of the multiple origins within these clusters fires more frequently than the others. The reason for this hierarchy remains unknown. Similar origin clusters occur in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. One such cluster is located near the ura4 gene on chromosome III and contains three origins: ars3002, ars3003, and ars3004. In their natural chromosomal context (ars3003 is about 2.5 kb upstream of ars3002 and ars3004 is adjacent to ars3002 on the downstream side) their initiation frequencies display a striking hierarchy: ars3002 >> ars3003 >> ars3004. Here, we describe experiments that reveal a 400 bp replication enhancer within ars3004, adjacent to ars3002. The enhancer is essential for ars3004 origin function in a plasmid, but even with the enhancer ars3004 is an inefficient origin. The enhancer is not essential for ars3002 plasmid origin activity, but dramatically stimulates this activity, converting ars3002 from an inefficient plasmid origin to a very efficient one. It also stimulates the plasmid origin activity of ars3001 and ars3003 at all tested positions and orientations on both sides of each autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) element. If ars3002 is redefined to include the enhancer, then the relative activities of the three ARS elements as single origins within separate plasmids or as origins when all three ARS elements are present in a single plasmid is the same as the chromosomal hierarchy. Thus, this replication enhancer defines the relative activities of the three origins in the ura4 origin region. Similar enhancers may affect relative activities in the origin clusters of animal cells.

Cell Count↗
PubMed2006

DNA replication in the archaea.

The archaeal DNA replication machinery bears striking similarity to that of eukaryotes and is clearly distinct from the bacterial apparatus. In recent years, considerable advances have been made in understanding the biochemistry of the archaeal replication proteins. Furthermore, a number of structures have now been obtained for individual components and higher-order assemblies of archaeal replication factors, yielding important insights into the mechanisms of DNA replication in both archaea and eukaryotes.

Archaea↗
PubMed1988

Mouse p53 blocks SV40 DNA replication in vitro and downregulates T antigen DNA helicase activity.

Immunopurified mouse p53 proteins were used to gain experimental access to the mechanisms underlying nonprimate p53 directed suppression of SV40 origin directed DNA replication in vivo. In replication competent HeLa cell extracts containing exogenous T antigen, mouse p53 blocks T antigen dependent DNA synthesis as in vivo. However, in transcription competent HeLa extracts, mouse p53 has no effect either on overall transcription or on the ability of immunopurified T antigen to downregulate SV40 early transcription. We show that although mouse p53 has no significant effect on T antigen encoded activities such as ATPase and DNA binding, helicase activity is somewhat reduced suggesting that the in vivo suppression by mouse p53 of SV40 replication may be due, at least in part, to direct modulation of T antigen function.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1994

Papillomavirus contains cis-acting sequences that can suppress but not regulate origins of DNA replication.

Bovine papillomavirus (BPV) DNA has been reported to restrict its own replication and that of the lytic simian virus 40 (SV40) origin to one initiation event per molecule per S phase, which suggests BPV DNA replication as a model for cellular chromosome replication. Suppression of the SV40 origin required two cis-acting BPV sequences (NCOR-1 and -2) and one trans-acting BPV protein. The results presented in this paper confirm the presence of two NCOR sequences in the BPV genome that can suppress polyomavirus (PyV) as well as SV40 origin-dependent DNA replication as much as 40-fold. However, in contrast to results of previous studies on SV40, most of the suppression of the PyV origin was due to NCOR-1, a 512-bp sequence that functioned independently of distance or orientation with respect to the PyV origin and that was not required for BPV DNA replication. Moreover, NCOR-1 alone or together with NCOR-2 did not restrict the ability of the PyV ori to reinitiate replication within a single S phase and did not require any BPV protein to exert suppression. Furthermore, NCOR-1 did not suppress BPV origin-dependent DNA replication except in the presence of PyV large tumor antigen (T-ag). Since NCOR-1 suppression of PyV origin activity also varied with T-ag concentration, suppression of origins by NCOR sequences appeared to require papovavirus T-ag. Therefore, it is unlikely that NCOR sequences are involved in regulating BPV DNA replication. When these results are taken together with those from other laboratories, BPV appears to be a slowly replicating version of papovaviruses rather than a model for origins of DNA replication in eukaryotic cell chromosomes.

Antigens, Viral, Tumor↗
PubMed1997

Role of nuclear architecture in the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication.

The eukaryotic genome is compacted in the cell nucleus, in a way that allows its faithful and ordered replication each cell cycle. Chromatin is organized into topologically constrained loops that are anchored to the nuclear matrix by specific attachment regions (SARs). Chromatin loops were proposed to correspond to replication units. In particular, it has been suggested that replication origins coincide with SARs. Critical examination of these hypotheses has long been hampered by the elusive nature of higher eukaryotic DNA replication origins and termini. In recent years, however, a number of loci have been mapped for both SARs and replication units, and studies on the nuclear localization of replicating DNA and replication proteins have begun. We review these data and argue that they question this model. We then try to delineate other aspects of chromosome compartmentalization and cell-cycle remodeling which might be responsible for the specification and activation of metazoan DNA replication origins.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

E1A represses wild-type and F9-selected polyomavirus DNA replication by a mechanism not requiring depression of large tumor antigen transcription.

Polyomavirus (Py) DNA replication may be regulated to a low-level replication state in specific target cells in mice as well as in certain undifferentiated murine cell lines, such as embryocarcinoma (EC) cells. To investigate possible mechanisms by which such control may occur, we have examined the effects of E1A on Py DNA replication. Adenovirus E1A proteins repress transcriptional activation of various enhancers, including those of Py, and can stimulate DNA replication in quiescent cells, but E1A effects on Py DNA replication were unknown. We found that constitutive E1A expression in NIH 3T3 cells depressed Py DNA replication very strongly. Two F9 EC cell-selected Py enhancer variants, PyF441 and PyF101, were also examined because undifferentiated EC cells are hypothesized to have an E1A-like activity responsible for the Py restriction, and these variants activate Py DNA replication in cis in undifferentiated F9 cells. Both variants were repressed by E1A, indicating that E1A activity in 3T3 cells is not equivalent to undifferentiated F9 cell E1A-like activity. We also examined transient inducible E1A expression in cells supplying Py large tumor antigen (T-Ag). Py DNA replication was again repressed, and the inhibition increased with E1A induction. Analysis of T-Ag mRNA levels indicated that E1A repression of Py DNA replication was not an indirect result of depression of T-Ag transcription. This suggests that E1A may repress Py DNA replication by a more direct mechanism, possibly by blocking enhancer activation of DNA replication in a manner uncoupled with enhancer transcriptional control.

Adenovirus Early Proteins↗
PubMed1999

Transcription factors in DNA replication.

Accumulating evidence suggests the involvement of transcription factors in the regulation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Almost all eukaryotic DNA viruses contain binding sites for transcription factors which function as auxiliary elements for DNA replication initiation at replication origins, and, indeed, the binding of transcription factors to these elements has been shown to stimulate DNA replication. Transcription factors also regulate some of the chromosome DNA replication origins of budding yeast, indicating that transcription factor involvement in DNA replication is not restricted to viruses. Consistent with this notion, recently determined replication origins of higher eukaryotes have been found occasionally to associate with transcription factor binding sites, although there is no direct evidence for the involvement of the factors that bind to these sequences in DNA replication. Analyses using viral and yeast systems have suggested that transcription factors stimulate the formation of the replication initiation complex by engaging in specific interactions with proteins of the initiation complex and/or by modulating the repressive chromatin structure around origins of replication. These mechanisms are analogous to those advanced to explain stimulation of transcription by transcription factors. The accumulated data suggests that transcription factors play a general role in the formation of functional complexes on chromosomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

tus, the trans-acting gene required for termination of DNA replication in Escherichia coli, encodes a DNA-binding protein.

The components for termination of DNA replication in Escherichia coli include the terminator signals T1 and T2 and the trans-acting gene tus. We have shown previously that tus maps in a 4-kilobase region of the chromosomal terminus near T2. Through the use of deletion and insertion mutants, the location of the tus gene has now been precisely identified. We sequenced 2416 nucleotides in this region and identified a 927-base-pair open reading frame which encodes Tus. Insertion of a kanamycin-resistance gene in this open reading frame abolished tus activity. We also demonstrated that crude extracts of tus+ cells contain a protein which binds to the T2 terminator sequence.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1987

Cell- and promoter-specific activation of transcription by DNA replication.

To study the effects that DNA replication can exert on transcription in mammalian cells, we have analyzed transient expression from the adenovirus major late promoter contained on replicating and nonreplicating plasmids in several cell types. When a 100-bp fragment containing the late promoter was used to direct expression of the simian virus 40 (SV40) early region, efficient transcription could be detected that was only slightly enhanced when a functional origin of replication was included in the plasmid. In contrast with this, and with similar findings using related late promoter-containing plasmids, expression from this promoter was absolutely dependent on DNA replication when it was inserted in the region of SV40 DNA encoding the late mRNA 5' ends and expression was assayed in human HeLa cells and BSC-1 and COS-7 monkey cells. In contrast, transcription was totally independent of replication in human 293 cells. These results, which were not due to differences in template copy number, suggest that both cis- and trans-acting factors can influence a promoter's response to DNA replication and point to possible functional similarities between replication origins and transcriptional enhancers.

Adenoviruses, Human↗
PubMed2006

Origin inactivation in bacterial DNA replication control.

Initiation of DNA replication is a highly regulated process in all organisms. Proteins that are required to recruit DNA polymerase - initiator proteins - are often used to regulate the timing or frequency of initiation in the cell cycle by limiting either their own synthesis or availability. Studies of the Escherichia coli chromosome and of bacterial plasmids with iterated initiator binding sites (iterons) have revealed that, in addition to initiator limitation, replication origin inactivation is used to prevent replication that is untimely or excessive. Our recent studies of plasmid P1 revealed that this additional mode of control becomes a requirement when initiator availability is limited only by autoregulation. Thus, although initiator limitation appears to be a well-conserved and central mode of replication control, optimal replication might require additional control mechanisms. This review gives examples of how the multiple mechanisms can act synergistically, antagonistically or be partially redundant to guarantee low frequency events. The lessons learned are likely to help understand many other regulatory systems in the bacterial cell.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1994

The Oct-1 POU domain stimulates adenovirus DNA replication by a direct interaction between the viral precursor terminal protein-DNA polymerase complex and the POU homeodomain.

The bipartite POU domain of transcription factor Oct-1 stimulates adenovirus DNA replication through an interaction with the octamer sequence present in the auxiliary origin. Employing an immobilized in vitro DNA replication system, we show that the POU domain enhances the formation of a pre-initiation complex composed of the viral precursor terminal protein-DNA polymerase (pTP-pol) complex and the origin. To investigate the mechanism of stimulation we have explored protein-protein interactions between the POU domain and the pTP-pol complex. Such an interaction could be detected using a GST-POU fusion protein bound to glutathione-agarose beads. Binding was also observed with the POU homeodomain (POUHD), albeit weaker than with the intact POU domain, but not with the POU specific subdomain. Four point mutations localized in the POUHD were analyzed for pTP-pol binding. Two of these, E22A and E30A, bound pTP-pol equally as well as the wild-type, while the other two, Q24A and E29A, were able to bind 2- to 4-fold better. These mutations are localized in the same region where the HSV transactivator VP16 binds, but did not coincide with the VP16 contacts. A direct correlation between pTP-pol binding and stimulation of DNA replication in vitro was observed for all mutants, suggesting that stimulation by the POU domain is caused by an interaction with the viral pTP-pol complex.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2004

Characterization of the interaction between P143 and LEF-3 from two different baculovirus species: Choristoneura fumiferana nucleopolyhedrovirus LEF-3 can complement Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus LEF-3 in supporting DNA replication.

The baculovirus protein P143 is essential for viral DNA replication in vivo, likely as a DNA helicase. We have demonstrated that another viral protein, LEF-3, first described as a single-stranded DNA binding protein, is required for transporting P143 into the nuclei of insect cells. Both of these proteins, along with several other early viral proteins, are also essential for DNA replication in transient assays. We now describe the identification, nucleotide sequences, and transcription patterns of the Choristoneura fumiferana nucleopolyhedrovirus (CfMNPV) homologues of p143 and lef-3 and demonstrate that CfMNPV LEF-3 is also responsible for P143 localization to the nucleus. We predicted that the interaction between P143 and LEF-3 might be critical for cross-species complementation of DNA replication. Support for this hypothesis was generated by substitution of heterologous P143 and LEF-3 between two different baculovirus species, Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus and CfMNPV, in transient DNA replication assays. The results suggest that the P143-LEF-3 complex is an important baculovirus replication factor.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

cis-Acting components of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA replication: linker substitution analysis of the HPV type 11 origin.

Papillomavirus DNA replication requires the viral trans-acting factors E1 and E2 in addition to the host cell's general replication machinery. The origins of DNA replication in bovine and human papillomavirus genomes have been localized to a specific part of the upstream regulatory region (URR) which includes recognition sites for E1 and E2 proteins. To fine map cis-acting elements influencing human papillomavirus type 11 (HPV-11) DNA replication and to determine the relative contributions of such sites, we engineered consecutive linker substitution mutations across a region of 158 bp in the HPV-11 origin and tested mutant origins for replication function in a cell-based transient replication assay. Our results both confirm and extend the findings of others. E2 binding sites are the major cis components of HPV-11 DNA replication, and there is evidence for synergy between these sites. Differential capacity of the three E2 binding sites within the origin to affect replication may be attributed, at least in part, to context. At least one E2 binding site is essential for replication. The imperfect AT-rich palindrome of the E1 helicase binding site is not essential since replication occurs even in the absence of this sequence. However, replication is enhanced by the presence of the palindromic sequence in the HPV-11 origin. Sequence components adjacent to the E1 and E2 binding sites, comprising AT-rich and purine-rich elements and the consensus TATA box sequence, probably contribute to the overall efficiency of replication, though they are nonessential. None of the other cis elements of the HPV-11 origin region analyzed seems to influence replication significantly in the system described. The HPV-11 origin of DNA replication therefore differs from those of the other papovaviruses, simian virus 40 and polyomavirus, inasmuch as an intact helicase binding site and adjacent AT-rich components, while influential, are not absolutely essential.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Cell cycle specific plasmid DNA replication in the nuclear extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: modulation by replication protein A and proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

Plasmid DNA replication in nuclear extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in vitro has been shown to be S-phase specific, similar to that observed in vivo. We report here a reconstituted in vitro system with partially purified replication proteins, purified replication protein A (RPA), and recombinant proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Nuclear extracts from S-phase, G(1)-phase, and unsynchronized yeast cells were fractionated by phosphocellulose chromatography. Protein fraction (polymerase fraction) enriched with replication proteins, including DNA polymerases (alpha, delta, etc.), was isolated, which was not capable of in vitro replication of supercoiled plasmid DNA. However, when purified yeast RPA and recombinant PCNA together were added to the polymerase fraction obtained from S-phase synchronized cells, in vitro plasmid DNA replication was restored. In vitro plasmid DNA replication with polymerase fractions from unsynchronized and G(1)-phase cells could not be reconstituted upon addition of purified RPA and PCNA. RPA and PCNA isolated from various phases of the cell cycle complemented the S-phase polymerase pool to the same extent. Reconstituted systems with the S-phase polymerase pool, complemented with either the RPA- and PCNA-containing fraction or purified RPA and recombinant PCNA together, were able to produce replication intermediates (ranging in size from 50 to 1500 bp) similar to that observed with the S-phase nuclear extract. Results presented here demonstrate that both RPA and PCNA are cell cycle-independent in their ability to stimulate in vitro plasmid DNA replication, whereas replication factors in the polymerase fractions are strictly S-phase dependent.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Evidence that partial unwrapping of DNA from nucleosomes facilitates the binding of heat shock factor following DNA replication in yeast.

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, heat shock transcription factor (HSF) binds heat shock element (HSE) DNA shortly after DNA replication, independently of its activation by heat shock. To determine if HSF binding occurs before newly replicated DNA is packaged into nucleosomes, we inserted an HSE into a DNA segment that normally forms a positioned nucleosome in vivo. Transcription from constructs designed to create steric competition between binding of HSF and histone H2A-H2B dimers was generally poor, suggesting that nucleosome assembly precedes and inhibits HSF binding. However, one such construct was as transcriptionally active as a nucleosome-free control. Structural analyses suggested that approximately 40 base pairs of DNA, including the HSE, had unwrapped from the 3' edge of the histone octamer, allowing HSF to bind; approximately 100 base pairs remained in association with the histone octamer, with the same translational and rotational orientation as was seen for the poorly transcribed constructs. Modeling studies suggest that the active and inactive constructs differ from one another in the ease with which the HSE and flanking sequences can adopt the curvature needed to form a stable nucleosome. These differences may influence the probability of DNA unwrapping from already assembled nucleosomes and the subsequent binding of HSF.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Site-directed mutational analysis of DnaA protein, the initiator of chromosomal DNA replication in E. coli.

DnaA protein, the initiator for chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli, has various activities, such as oligomerization (DnaA-DnaA interaction), ATP-binding, ATPase activity and membrane-binding. Site-directed mutational analyses have revealed not only the amino acid residues that are essential for these activities but also the functions of these activities. Following is a summary of the functions and regulatory mechanisms of DnaA protein in the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication. ATP-bound DnaA protein, but not other forms of the protein binds to the origin of DNA replication and forms oligomers to open-up the duplex DNA. This oligomerization is mediated by a DnaA-DnaA interaction through the N-terminal region of the protein. After initiation of DNA replication, the ATPase activity of DnaA protein is stimulated and DnaA protein is inactivated to the ADP-bound form to suppress the re-initiation of DNA replication. DnaA protein binds to acidic phospholipids through an ionic interaction between basic amino acid residues of the protein and acidic residues of phospholipids. This interaction seems to be involved in the re-activation of DnaA protein (from the ADP-bound form to the ATP-bound form) to initiate DNA replication after the appropriate interval.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1990

Minimal subenhancer requirements for high-level polyomavirus DNA replication: a cell-specific synergy of PEA3 and PEA1 sites.

The cell-specific regulation of DNA replication has important implications for the molecular strategy of cellular gene control. Mouse polyomavirus (Py) DNA replication is examined as a model of cell-specific replication control. Using an FM3A-derived mouse cell line which expresses early viral proteins (FOP cells), we determined the minimal sequence requirements for viral DNA replication. FOP cells were observed to have much simpler enhancer requirements than 3T6 and many other cells and did not need a B enhancer for high levels of DNA replication. Using these cells, we show that the individual or tandem binding sites for several unrelated trans-acting factors which are generally subfunctional as transcriptional enhancers (simian virus 40 A core, TGTGGAATG; EBP20, TGTGGTTTT; PEA1 [an AP-1 analog], GTGACTAA; PEA2, GACCGCAG; and PEA3, AGGAAG) stimulated low levels of Py DNA replication. The ordered dimeric combination of PEA3 and PEA1 factor-binding sites, however, acted synergistically to stimulate viral DNA replication to high wild-type levels. This is in contrast to prior results in which much larger enhancer sequences were necessary for high-level viral DNA replication. PEA3/PEA1-stimulated DNA replication showed a distance and orientation independence relative to the origin, which disagrees with some but not other prior analyses of enhancer-dependent DNA replication. It therefore appears that trans-acting factor-binding sites (enhansons) can generally activate DNA replication and that the AP-1 family of sites may act synergistically with other associated trans-acting factors to strongly affect Py DNA replication in specific cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Adenovirus DNA replication: protein priming, jumping back and the role of the DNA binding protein DBP.

The adenovirus (Ad) genome is a linear double-stranded (ds) molecule containing about 36 kilobase pairs. At each end of the genome an approximately 100 base pair (bp) inverted terminal repeat (ITR) is found, the exact length depending on the serotype. To the 5'-end of each ITR, a 55-kDa terminal protein (TP) is covalently coupled. The Ad DNA replication system was one of the first replication systems that could be reconstituted in vitro (Challberg and Kelly 1979). The system requires three virally encoded proteins: precursor TP (pTP), DNA polymerase (Pol) and the DNA binding protein (DBP). In addition, three stimulating human cellular proteins have been identified. These are the transcription factors NFI (Nagata et al. 1982) and Oct-1 (Pruijn et al. 1986) and the type I topoisomerase NFII (Nagata et al. 1983). Ad DNA replication uses a protein primer for replication initiation. The transition from initiation to elongation is marked by a jumping back mechanism (King and van der Vliet 1994), followed by elongation. In order to elongate DBP is required. In this review we discuss the roles of DBP during initiation and elongation and we relate biochemical data on the jumping back mechanism used by Ad Pol to the recently solved crystal structure of a Pol alpha-like replication complex (Franklin et al. 2001). We comment on the conditions and possible functions of jumping back and propose a model to describe the jumping back mechanism.

Adenoviridae↗