SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Compomers”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Fluoride uptake and release by composites and glass ionomers in a high caries challenge situation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the behavior of composite resins and glass ionomer cements with regard to the uptake and release of fluoride, in a high caries challenge situation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard test specimens of glass ionomer cement (Chelon Fil), a resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer), two polyacid-modified composite resins (VariGlass and Dyract) and a composite resin (Heliomolar), were submitted for 14 days to demineralization and remineralization cycles in order to simulate a high caries challenge, while from the eighth day onward, a fluoridated dentifrice solution was applied for 5 minutes twice a day and the daily fluoride release of those materials to the mediums was quantified and compared. Fifteen test specimens were prepared for each material, making up a total of 75. RESULTS: All materials studied, except for Heliomolar from day 4 to day 7 in the demineralizing solution, were capable of releasing fluoride in measurable quantities during the whole experiment. The fluoride amounts released by Chelon Fil, Vitremer, VariGlass and Dyract were significantly higher in the demineralizing solution (ANOVA, P < 0.05) than in the remineralizing solution, during almost the entire experiment. The fluoride amounts released by Heliomolar were significantly higher in the remineralizing solution (ANOVA, P < 0.05) than in the demineralizing solution, during almost the entire experiment. All materials studied were capable of uptaking fluoride from the dentifrice solution and of later releasing it to the solution, maintaining the release relatively constant and at a higher level than that seen between days 5 and 7.
Thickness and morphology of resin-infiltrated dentin layer in young, old, and sclerotic dentin.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the morphology of the resin tags and the resin-infiltrated dentin layer (RIDL) of several bonding systems in superficial vs deep young, old, and sclerotic human dentin. Dentin was obtained after the removal of occlusal enamel from extracted molars. Phosphoric acid gels (35-37%) were used to etch dentin before the application of bonding systems (OptiBond FL; Prime & Bond 2.0; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and Scotchbond 1; One Step). Each bonded specimen was then sectioned into two halves. One half was polished using a standard procedure to evaluate RIDL thickness and morphology by SEM. The other half was demineralized and deproteinized to evaluate the presence and the morphology of resin tags. RIDL was thinner in superficial dentin than in deeper dentin for all the materials tested regardless of the type of dentin. Sclerotic and old dentin showed thinner RIDL, with short resin tags, and fewer lateral branches than normal dentin.
In vitro microleakage of glass-ionomer composite resin hybrid materials.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of six glass-ionomer composite resin hybrid materials compared with a glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin. Standardized class 5 dentin cavities were prepared on root surfaces of 240 extracted human teeth that were randomly assigned to eight groups and restored using the following restorative systems: (I) Vitremer, (II) Compoglass, (III) Photac-Fil Aplicap, (IV) Variglass, (V) Dyract, (VI) Fuji II LC, (VII) Ketac-Fil Aplicap, and (VIII) Z100. The teeth were thermocycled, placed in a 2% methylene blue solution, and sectioned with diamond disks. Dye penetration was scored on a scale of 0-3. Results showed no significant differences among groups VIII, IV, I, V, VI, III, and II. There were also no significant differences among groups VI, III, II, and VII.
The effect of post-curing on Vickers Hardness of four light-cure resin composite materials.
The use of post-curing ovens to post-cure light-cured resin composite restorations leads to a decrease in the negative effects of polymerization shrinkage and an increase in the hardness and wear resistance of the material. The aim of this study was to compare the Vickers Hardness (VH) of four different light-cure resin composite materials. In one group, samples of the four materials, Z100, Tetric Ceram, F2000 and Heliomolar were light-cured only, and in the other group a similar set of samples were light-cured and also post-cured in a DI 500 post-curing oven. VH vests were then carried out on the samples. All samples in the post-cured group had higher VH values (p = 0.000) than the corresponding samples in the light-cured only group. Z100 and F2000 had, in both groups, significantly higher VH values (p = 0.000) than Tetric Ceram and Heliomolar.
A resin-modified glass ionomer restorative: three-year clinical results.
Resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorative materials have gained popularity in recent years. Their use is most often indicated in Class III and Class V cavities in adults and in numerous applications in children. This popularity in use has taken place in the absence of scientific knowledge of the RMGI materials. Lacking are adequate clinical trials to validate the proposed indications. The purpose of this study was to examine a representative RMGI in cervical abrasions and root caries in adults. Patients were recalled up to three years to evaluate standard clinical criteria. Results found the RMGI to be inferior to conventional composite resin in similar applications. The most noted deficiencies were in color stability and anatomic form, or wear of the RMGI. The results of this prospective clinical trial would suggest a limited longevity for RMGI compared to traditional restorative materials. This study also reinforces the need for evidence of clinical performance prior to making decisions regarding material selections.
Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin.
The shear bond strength of different types of composite resins repaired with a hybrid composite was evaluated. The hybrid composite resin was repaired with itself as a control. The results of this study showed that the shear bond strength of the repair with most types of composite resins was minimally adequate.
Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake.
The objective of this study was to assess the surface roughness of eight esthetic restorative materials and the relationship with weight changes during fluoride release and uptake. Five specimens each of ChemFil Superior, Fuji IX Dyract, Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil, Ketac-Silver, and Z100 (control) were prepared and immersed in 2 ml of artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. The changes in specimen weight and fluoride release were monitored for 12 weeks. This protocol was repeated after recharging the specimens with 1.23% APF gel for 12 more weeks. The immersed and fresh specimens for each material were then examined with SEM and surface profilometry. There was a significant weight loss for all glass ionomer cements following APF gel application (P < 0.01), which correlated with fluoride release (r = 0.89-0.98). Mean roughness (Ra) measurements and SEM showed that roughness increased from the resin composite to the conventional glass ionomer cements. The marked erosive effect of APF gel on glass ionomer restorations could increase surface colonization by plaque micro-organisms, and reduce the longevity of the restorations.
Application of glass ionomer cements in restorative dentistry.
Dentistry was marked with radical changes in clinical restorative procedures. If the inherent characteristic of the ionomer cement was examined, it becomes very clear to the researcher as well as the dentist, that no other material has had an impact as comparable to glass ionomer cements on restorative dentistry. This scientific paper highlights the clinical applications of the cement in restorative dentistry. Glass ionomer cements are bioactive, by forming permanent adhesive bonds to dentin and enamel which enables them to prevent the development of secondary caries by providing an impermeable seal against the intrusion of oral fluids and other caries producing agents. The hydrophilic nature of the cement also makes them susceptible to the action of aqueous fluids before they are fully set, requiring that the freshly placed restoration be protected by varish, petroleum jelly or a low viscosity photo polymerizing bonding agent.
Modern alternatives to amalgam: cementable restorations and inlays.
There are still no replacement materials on the market that are equal to amalgam. However, alternatives of differing qualities are available and, for the most part, clinically proven. This article attempts to make a scientific and clinical comparison of these alternatives with respect to esthetics, biocompatibility, chemical durability, and treatment cost. The evaluation suggests that cementable restorations, in particular electroformed inlays and onlays, are superior to bonded ceramic inlays.
Materials for modern dental cementations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Core build-up materials and techniques.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Advantages of new restorative materials in dental care for children.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Resin ionomer restorative materials for children: a review. Author's reply.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results.
The aim of the present clinical study was an in vivo evaluation of an improved conventional glass ionomer cement Ketac Molar (ESPE), compared to a polyacid modified composite resin, Dyract (Dentsply/De Trey), used in primary molars. Fifty-three Ketac Molar and fifty-two Dyract restorations were placed in box-only preparations in primary molars. The application time for the chemically cured Ketac Molar, was longer compared to the light-cured Dyract. In comparing the materials, no differences were found, comparing both materials regarding secondary caries, marginal adaptation, wear and fracture toughness. One case of recurrent caries adjacent to a Ketac Molar restoration and two cases in the Dyract group were reported. Two Ketac Molar restorations and one Dyract showed bulk fracture at the time of evaluation. At the twelve-month evaluation, no difference between the investigated materials was registered, which indicates that Ketac Molar can be used as a proximal restoration in the primary dentition. It should be emphasized, however, that one-year data should not be extrapolated to indicate the long-term success of restorations.
The use of glass ionomers in pediatric patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the esthetics of 3 resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and 1 polyacid-modified resin composite to the esthetics of a conventional glass-ionomer control material. METHOD AND MATERIALS: One hundred eighty-seven Class V cervical restorations were observed clinically over 18 months. The esthetic index system that was used evaluated color match, translucency or opacity, and surface roughness. RESULTS: The tested materials behaved very dissimilarly and inconsistently. In general, the esthetic results of the resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and the polyacid-modified resin composite were far from optimal. The esthetic appearance of restorations seriously deteriorated during clinical service, mainly because of discoloration of margins, changes in translucency and opacity, and rapidly appearing roughness or dullness on the surface. Both the resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and the polyacid-modified resin composite evaluated in this study performed better esthetically than did the conventional glass-ionomer material. CONCLUSION: Indications for these combination materials are limited to areas where esthetics is not a primary concern but where their ease of application may guarantee a more durable functional result.