Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ASPIRIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources

A reevaluation of aspirin therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin therapy has been largely superseded by prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, in part because of premarketing studies suggesting lesser toxic effects for NSAIDs than for aspirin. This study evaluates these toxic effects in a postmarketing population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We studied 1521 consecutive courses of aspirin and 4860 courses of NSAIDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from eight Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information System Post-marketing Surveillance Centers. Toxicity index scores were generated from symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, and hospitalizations, weighted for variable severity and severity of side effect. RESULTS: The toxicity index was only 1.37 (SE = 0.10) for aspirin and 1.87 to 2.90 for selected nonsalicylate NSAIDs. These differences were consistent across centers and remained after statistical adjustment for differing patient characteristics. There was a different toxicity with different aspirin preparations, with a score for plain aspirin of 1.36 (SE = 0.23), for buffered aspirin of 1.10 (0.20), and for enteric-coated aspirin preparations of 0.92 (0.14). Most important, there were strong dose effects, with a score of 0.73 (0.09) for 651 to 2600 mg daily, 1.08 (0.17) for 2601 to 3900 mg, and 1.91 (0.38) for more than 3900 mg. The average aspirin dose taken was only 2665 mg/d, approximately eight "tablets," compared with 3600 to 4800 mg/d used in the 16 pivotal premarketing studies reviewed. Average NSAID doses were, on the other hand, lower in premarketing trials (eg, naproxen 500 mg/d vs 773 mg/d in the Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical System clinical practices). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin therapy, in doses commonly employed in practice, has an excellent safety profile in rheumatoid arthritis, and it is the least costly NSAID. The safety advantage is explained primarily by a dose effect and secondarily by possible differences between formulations. Newer management strategies for rheumatoid arthritis emphasize NSAID use as symptomatic therapy and use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy for anti-inflammatory objectives. Thus, the original recommendation for "anti-inflammatory" doses of aspirin now is less easily justified. Aspirin therapy merits reconsideration as adjunctive therapy for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Aspirin after myocardial infarction: the importance of over-the-counter use.

BACKGROUND: Regular aspirin is beneficial after myocardial infarction (MI). Community-based surveys appear to show unsatisfactory uptake of aspirin after MI. This could be due to over-the-counter (OTC) use not being recorded. In a pilot study in one practice, 39% of patients on aspirin after MI used OTC preparations. In addition, women and older patients were less likely to use aspirin. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe aspirin use following MI in general practices in West London, including regimens and OTC use, and to demonstrate any association between aspirin use and gender, age or social class. METHODS: We used a postal questionnaire survey. The setting was a random sample of six general practices in Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow Health Authority who use Egton Medical Information Systems (EMIS) to store morbidity data. The subjects were registered patients with a history of MI. The main outcome measures were questionnaire data on aspirin use, regimen, OTC use, prescription charge exemption, age, gender, ethnic group and social class. RESULTS: The prevalence of previously recorded MI in all age groups was 0.64%. The response rate was 89%. Regular aspirin was used by 80%. Of these, 22% use OTC aspirin. OTC use was significantly more common in those paying prescription charges. Aspirin use was not associated with gender, age or social class. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a high uptake of aspirin among patients with previous MI as recorded by computer. OTC aspirin use was significant, and should be inquired about and recorded.

Age Distribution↗

Aggrenox: a fixed-dose combination of aspirin and dipyridamole.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a fixed-dose combination of aspirin and extended-release (ER) dipyridamole indicated for the secondary prevention of stroke. DATA SOURCES: Published articles and abstracts were identified from a MEDLINE search (1966-December 1999) using the search terms dipyridamole, aspirin, antiplatelet, antiaggregation, and stroke prevention. Pertinent articles written in English were considered for review. Additional articles were identified from the references of retrieved literature. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies including a combination of aspirin/dipyridamole in human subjects were evaluated. Emphasis was placed on randomized, controlled trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Aspirin is a platelet inhibitor that works by inhibiting platelet cyclooxygenase, which reduces the production of thromboxane A2. Dipyridamole is a platelet inhibitor that is thought to work in part by inhibiting platelet cyclic-3',5'-adenosine monophosphate and cyclic-3',5'-guanosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase. The active metabolite of aspirin, salicylic acid, is highly bound to plasma protein and has a plasma half-life of two to three hours. Dipyridamole is also highly bound to plasma proteins, and the ER formulation has a plasma half-life of 13 hours. The first European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS-1) found the combination of aspirin/dipyridamole to be superior to placebo in the prevention of stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). The ESPS-1, however, did not include an aspirin-only treatment arm. Therefore, it was unclear whether the combination of aspirin/dipyridamole was superior to aspirin alone. As a result, a second trial was conducted that included treatment arms of aspirin alone, ER dipyridamole alone, combination therapy, and placebo. The combination of aspirin 25 mg plus ER dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily was shown in the ESPS-2 to be significantly better than either agent given individually in preventing stroke and TIAs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends aspirin 50-325 mg/d to be the initial antiplatelet of choice for the prevention of atherothrombotic cerebral ischemic events. However, with the favorable results of the ESPS-2, it may be appropriate to substitute aspirin/ER dipyridamole for aspirin alone as the drug of choice. This combination appears to have a favorable adverse effect profile. The relative effectiveness of aspirin/ER dipyridamole compared with clopidogrel and ticlopidine has yet to be determined. If alternative antiplatelet therapy is needed, the ACCP recommends clopidogrel rather than ticlopidine because of its lower incidence of adverse effects. The ACCP further states that the combination of aspirin plus dipyridamole may be more effective than clopidogrel; these agents have a similarly favorable adverse effect profile.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Aspirin for the primary prevention of stroke and other major vascular events: meta-analysis and hypotheses.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin therapy reduces stroke by about 25% for persons with atherosclerotic vascular disease, but the effect in those without clinically apparent vascular disease is distinctly different. OBJECTIVE: To define the effect of aspirin use on stroke and other major vascular events when given for primary prevention to persons without clinically recognized vascular disease. DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials and large prospective observational cohort studies examining the relation between aspirin use and stroke in persons at low intrinsic risk. Studies were identified by a computerized search of the English-language literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five randomized trials of primary prevention included 52 251 participants randomized to aspirin doses ranging from 75 to 650 mg/d; the mean overall stroke rate was 0.3% per year during an average follow-up of 4.6 years. Meta-analysis revealed no significant effect on stroke (relative risk = 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.24) contrasting with a decrease in myocardial infarction (relative risk = 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.82). The lack of reduction of stroke by aspirin for primary prevention was incompatible with its protective effect against stroke in patients with manifest vascular disease (P = .001). Intracranial hemorrhage was increased by the regular use of aspirin (relative risk = 1.35; P = .03), similarly for both primary and secondary prevention. In 4 large observational studies, self-selected use of aspirin was consistently associated with higher rates of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of aspirin therapy on stroke differs between individuals based on the presence or absence of overt vascular disease, in contrast with the consistent reduction in myocardial infarction by aspirin therapy observed in all populations. We hypothesize that the effect of aspirin therapy on stroke for persons with major risk factors for vascular disease may be intermediate between a substantial decrease for those with manifest vascular disease and a possible small increase for healthy persons due to accentuated intracranial hemorrhage. When aspirin is given for primary prevention of vascular events, available data support using 75 to 81 mg/d.

Adult↗

Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: the Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Basic research and observational evidence as well as results from trials of colon polyp recurrence suggest a role for aspirin in the chemoprevention of cancer. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of aspirin on the risk of cancer among healthy women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In the Women's Health Study, a randomized 2 x 2 factorial trial of aspirin and vitamin E conducted between September 1992 and March 2004, 39 876 US women aged at least 45 years and initially without previous history of cancer, cardiovascular disease, or other major chronic illness were randomly assigned to receive either aspirin or aspirin placebo and followed up for an average of 10.1 years. INTERVENTION: A dose of 100 mg of aspirin (n=19 934) or aspirin placebo (n=19 942) administered every other day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Confirmed newly diagnosed invasive cancer at any site, except for nonmelanoma skin cancer. Incidence of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer were secondary end points. RESULTS: No effect of aspirin was observed on total cancer (n = 2865; relative risk [RR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.08; P = .87), breast cancer (n = 1230; RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87-1.09; P = .68), colorectal cancer (n = 269; RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.24; P = .83), or cancer of any other site, with the exception of lung cancer for which there was a trend toward reduction in risk (n = 205; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.59-1.03; P = .08). There was also no reduction in cancer mortality either overall (n = 583; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.81-1.11; P = .51) or by site, except for lung cancer mortality (n = 140; RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99; P = .04). No evidence of differential effects of aspirin by follow-up time or interaction with vitamin E was found. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this large-scale, long-term trial suggest that alternate day use of low-dose aspirin (100 mg) for an average 10 years of treatment does not lower risk of total, breast, colorectal, or other site-specific cancers. A protective effect on lung cancer or a benefit of higher doses of aspirin cannot be ruled out.

Aspirin↗

Nuclear factor kappa B activation is a potential target for preventing pancreatic carcinoma by aspirin.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic carcinoma exhibits a unique genetic profile of mutations that may play key roles in its progression to malignant phenotypes. Constitutive activation of transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) is a frequent molecular alteration in pancreatic carcinoma, suggesting a possible link between inflammation and cancer. The aims of the current study were to determine the effects of aspirin on pancreatic carcinoma prevention and to reveal a possible mechanism of aspirin-mediated cancer chemoprevention. METHODS: An orthotopic mouse model with human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines PANC-1, PANC-1/Puro, and PANC-1/IkappaBalphaM was used to study the inhibitory effects of aspirin on pancreatic tumor formation. RESULTS: Aspirin inhibited constitutive NF-kappaB activity in culture and, in turn, decreased the expression of the NF-kappaB downstream target gene, Cox-2, in PANC-1 or PANC-1/Puro cells, without significantly inhibiting the in vitro growth of PANC-1/Puro cells. All animals inoculated with either PANC-1 or PANC-1/Puro cells, and not given aspirin, developed pancreatic tumors, whereas none of the mice injected with PANC-1/IkappaBalphaM cells showed any evidence of pancreatic tumor formation. Animals given aspirin for 6 days before, or at the time of, orthotopic tumor cell injection showed a significantly lower incidence of tumor formation compared with those receiving aspirin 2 weeks after inoculation and controls receiving no aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin repressed tumor formation by PANC-1 cells in vivo in a prophylactic setting, suggesting a possible mechanism for aspirin's preventive effect in pancreatic carcinoma through inhibition of NF-kappaB activation and a mechanistic link between inflammation and tumorigenesis. Aspirin-mediated antiinflammatory approaches might be an effective strategy to prevent pancreatic carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Preparation and analysis of deuterium-labeled aspirin: application to pharmacokinetic studies.

Inhibition of endogenous prostacyclin and thromboxane biosynthesis by aspirin is critically dose-dependent in humans. Gastrointestinal and hepatic hydrolysis may limit systemic availability of aspirin, especially in low doses, perhaps contributing to the biochemical selectivity of aspirin. Existing analytical methods do not permit determination of systemic bioavailability when low (less than 100 mg) doses of aspirin are administered. Deuterium-labeled aspirin (2-acetoxy[3,4,5,6-2H4]benzoic acid) was synthesized from salicylic acid by catalytic exchange and subsequent acetylation. Analysis of the compounds as benzyl esters by GC-MS followed extractive alkylation from plasma. Heptadeuterated compounds were used as internal standards. Simultaneous administration of tetradeuterated aspirin intravenously with native aspirin orally to anesthetized dogs permitted kinetic studies of both aspirin and salicylic acid. The sensitivity of the method is superior to published methods using HPLC and, thus, more applicable to studies of low dose aspirin. Pulse administration of stable isotope-labeled aspirin permits detailed and repeated studies of dose-related aspirin pharmacokinetics in humans.

Animals↗

Clopidogrel plus long-term aspirin after femoro-popliteal stenting. The CLAFS project: 1- and 2-year results.

The aim of this study was to determine the patency rate after femoro-popliteal stenting followed by oral clopidogrel plus long-term aspirin. In a prospective trial, 31 patients with a total of 33 femoro-popliteal artery lesions (21 stenoses, 12 occlusions; 24 femoral, 9 popliteal) were treated with flexible tantalum stents after unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) preceded by local fibrinolysis in 5 of 12 patients with total occlusion. Post-interventionally, oral aspirin 100 mg was started simultaneously for the long term and was combined with an oral loading dose of 300 mg clopidogrel, followed by 75 mg clopidogrel daily for 28 days. Patients were followed for at least 12 months (maximum 34 months) by clinical examination, Doppler pressure measurement, color and duplex sonography, and angiography in case of suspicion of restenosis. In a retrospective analysis, the results were compared with those of historical groups of patients having received aspirin only (41 patients) or a long-term high-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)+aspirin treatment (42 patients). Three small puncture aneurysms were treated successfully by conservative means and were categorized as minor bleeding complication. Cumulative primary patency rate (PPR) was 76 +/- 7.5% (1 year), and 70 +/- 9.6% (2 years) in the clopidogrel+aspirin group, thus being tendentiously better than in the aspirin-only group showing 75 +/- 4.6% (1 year), and 50 +/- 8.1% (2 years). Long-term high-dose LMWH+aspirin treatment showed 87 +/- 5.8% (1 year), and 72 +/- 9.1% (2 years), thus being superior to the other treatment regimes, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the LMWH+aspirin and the aspirin group. Clopidogrel plus aspirin is a safe medication regimen and may be effective in the prevention of early stent thrombosis. Mid- and long-term patency rate seems to be intermediate as compared with other therapeutic regimens. The LMWH+aspirin seems to be superior compared with CLAFS; however, randomized studies with larger patient numbers are recommended.

Administration, Oral↗

Prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Aspirin resistance has been recognised to occur in patients with cardiovascular disease and is associated with poor clinical prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of aspirin resistance in 172 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM-2). Platelet function of 172 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes on chronic aspirin therapy was evaluated. The effect of aspirin was assessed using the platelet function analyser (PFA-100) system, reporting platelet-dependent thrombus formation as the time required to close a small aperture in a biologically active membrane. Resistance to aspirin was defined as a normal collagen/epinephrine-induced closure time (82-165 s). Aspirin responders were defined when closure time was > or =300 s. Thirty-seven (21.5%) of the type 2 diabetic patients were found to be resistant to chronic aspirin therapy, 29 (16.9%) were semi-responders and 106 (61.6%) were responders. Univariate analysis revealed that aspirin non-responders were significantly younger (p<0.05) compared to aspirin responders. A significant number of type 2 diabetic patients are resistant to aspirin therapy. Aspirin resistance can be evaluated by point-of-care testing and should be recognised in diabetic patients that are treated for primary or secondary prevention.

Aspirin↗

Aspirin therapy: optimized platelet inhibition with different loading and maintenance doses.

Inhibition of cyclooxygenase by aspirin has been shown to be beneficial in clinical situations such as acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. The precise effect of various doses of aspirin on acute and long-term inhibition of platelet aggregation and thromboxane synthesis remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the effect of oral aspirin (0, 40, 100, 300, or 500 mg) as the initial loading dose in combination with different maintenance doses of aspirin (0, 40, or 100 mg/day) for 14 days on platelet function in healthy men. Bleeding time 2 or 24 hours after the first aspirin administration was significantly increased for 300 and 500 mg aspirin (p < 0.01). Two hours after the first administration of 100, 300, and 500 mg aspirin, a significant inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation (ED50 collagen: from 3 +/- 1 to 17 +/- 2, 24 +/- 3, 22 +/- 3 micrograms/ml, respectively) was seen. At the same time serum thromboxane B2 synthesis was inhibited by more than 99% with 300 and 500 mg aspirin. At the end of the 14-day observation period, bleeding time was significantly prolonged for the different combinations of aspirin doses compared with initial values (p < 0.01). Collagen-induced platelet aggregation and serum thromboxane B2 synthesis were significantly inhibited for all aspirin combinations tested at 14 days (p < 0.05). The 40/40 mg aspirin combination was less effective, because it reached its maximal effect very late at day 7 of the observation period compared with the other combinations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

Effects of aspirin DL-lysine on thrombin generation in unstable angina pectoris.

To evaluate the effects of aspirin on thrombin generation in patients with unstable angina, plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) as a new marker of thrombin generation and of 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (11-dehydro-TXB2) as an indicator of platelet activation were measured in 18 patients with unstable angina, including 8 patients with prolonged rest angina (> 15 minutes). Aspirin DL-lysine (900 mg) was administered intravenously to 9 of the 18 patients (aspirin group); the other 9 were not given aspirin during the first 24 hours of hospitalization (non-aspirin group). Clinical characteristics, angiographic features and medications other than aspirin were similar between the 2 groups. Levels of plasma TAT and 11-dehydro-TXB2 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients with prolonged rest angina than in those without the condition (n = 10). In 5 patients with prolonged rest angina who received aspirin, plasma TAT levels (ng/ml) were significantly decreased (4.52 +/- 1.18 at baseline, 2.50 +/- 0.65 at 1 hour and 2.16 +/- 0.42 at 24 hours after aspirin administration, p < 0.01) with a significant decrease in plasma 11-dehydro-TXB2 levels. However, the reduction in TAT after aspirin administration was slight in patients without prolonged rest angina (n = 4). In contrast, levels of plasma TAT and 11-dehydro-TXB2 in the non-aspirin group remained unchanged during the study period. These results suggest that aspirin rapidly reduces thrombin generation through inhibition of platelet activity in patients with unstable angina with prolonged rest angina.

Aged↗

Aspirin and allergic diseases: a review.

Aspirin intolerance manifests itself as an acute urticaria-angioedema, bronchospasm, severe rhinitis, or shock occurring within three hours of aspirin ingestion. Aspirin intolerance occurs most commonly in patients with chronic urticaria (23 percent), in whom it is mostly manifested by the urticarial type of aspirin intolerance, and in asthmatic persons (4 to 19 percent), in whom it is mostly manifested by the bronchospastic type. The frequency of aspirin intolerance in patients with nasal polyps is about 23 percent, and consists of the bronchospastic type of intolerance. There is no definite evidence that aspirin intolerance is mediated by an immunologic reaction. In the bronchospastic type, an association between prostaglandins and the slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis seems likely. The pathogenic mechanism for the urticarial type of aspirin intolerance is unknown. Under carefully controlled conditions, a transient desensitization to aspirin is possible. Various drugs, most of which are prostaglandin inhibitors, cross-react with aspirin in intolerant persons. They are, in decreasing order of frequency, as follows: indomethacin (100 percent), ibuprofen, mefenamic acid, phenylbutazone, sodium benzoate, tartrazine and acetaminophen (5 percent). Aspirin is an efficacious drug with increasing therapeutic use. In order to minimize its risk and increase its safety, physicians should familiarize themselves with those high-risk conditions where aspirin therapy should be avoided, or at least used cautiously.

Aspirin↗

Low-dose preoperative aspirin therapy, postoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements.

The effects of three low-dose regimens of preoperative aspirin therapy on postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay were recorded in a prospective cohort study of 202 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. One hundred one patients had been prescribed daily aspirin by the referring cardiologist (44 at 75 mg, 28 at 150 mg, and 29 at 300 mg); the remaining 101 patients who had not been prescribed aspirin acted as a control group. A median postoperative blood loss of 870 mL in the control group was increased by 280 mL in the 75-mg aspirin group (p less than 0.001), by 490 mL in the 150-mg aspirin group (p less than 0.001), and by 230 mL in the 300-mg aspirin group (p = 0.03). The median requirement for blood transfusion of 2 U red blood cell concentrates in the control group was increased by 2 U in the 75-mg aspirin group (p less than 0.001), 2 U in the 150-mg aspirin group (p less than 0.001), and 1 U in the 300-mg aspirin group (p = 0.05). Hemostatic "packs" (fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate) were required in 20 patients in the aspirin groups as compared with 5 in the control group (p less than 0.01 by chi 2 test). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 8 days for all groups. Regular daily low-dose aspirin therapy produces significant increases in postoperative blood loss, resulting in a substantial increase in blood transfusion and hemostatic pack requirements, but does not prolong postoperative hospital stay.

Aspirin↗

Failure of children with asthma to respond to daily aspirin therapy.

Adverse reactions to aspirin in asthmatic patients have been widely described in the past. In contrast to this more frequent complication, several authors have published reports suggesting that aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can improve asthma. We studied the effect of long-term aspirin administration in children with moderately severe asthma. Ten children who showed no immediate effect of aspirin challenge (either adverse or beneficial) were placed in a 9 wk, double-blind crossover study, receiving aspirin (10 gr twice daily) or placebo for 4 wk, then a 1 wk washout period, followed by aspirin or placebo for 4 wk. There was no difference between aspirin and placebo periods in number of wheezing episodes, frequency of additional bronchodilator or prednisone use, or daily spirometric measurements. Serum thromboxane B2 levels were significantly reduced during aspirin therapy (p less than 0.001), indicating that the patients had complied with the aspirin therapy. Thus long-term administration of aspirin to asthmatics who show no immediate beneficial or adverse response to aspirin challenge appeared not to influence the clinical course of asthma. In addition, inhibition of the platelet prostaglandin cyclooxygenase pathway in these patients did not modify the clinical course of their asthma.

Adolescent↗

The effects of low, medium and high dose aspirin on intimal proliferation in autologous vein grafts used for arterial reconstruction.

Bilateral femoral vein grafts were implanted in 47 adult mongrel dogs to determine the effects of aspirin on intimal hyperplasia. The animals were fed a commercially-prepared 2% cholesterol diet before and for 6 weeks following operation. Twelve animals served as the controls while the remaining animals were divided into three groups receiving low, medium, and high dose aspirin. Eleven animals received 75 mg of aspirin daily, 11 animals were fed 225 mg of aspirin daily and the remaining 13 animals received 650 mg of aspirin daily. A coagulation profile was carried out before operation and at 2, 4 and 6 weeks following operation. The grafts were harvested at 6 weeks and intimal thickness was measured with a Zeiss computerized interactive image-analyzing system. The prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and platelet count were unchanged in all animals. The bleeding time was prolonged in animals receiving aspirin (P less than 0.02). Intimal thickness measured 4 +/- 0.2 microns before implantation and increased at 6 weeks to 39 +/- 5 microns in the control group. Aspirin failed to reduce intimal hyperplasia. Intimal thickness measured 37 +/- 2 microns in those animals receiving 75 mg of aspirin daily, 35 +/- 3 microns after a daily dose of 225 mg of aspirin and 51 +/- 4 microns in the high dose group receiving 650 mg of aspirin daily. Our data indicates that aspirin fails to reduce intimal proliferation in canine vein grafts which suggests that alternative or combined drug therapy may be necessary to reduce the incidence of late graft failure.

Animals↗

Relation between atherosclerosis risk factors and aspirin resistance in a primary prevention population.

Resistance to inhibition of platelet function by aspirin may contribute to future myocardial infarction and stroke. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes have been associated with aspirin resistance on several different platelet function assays, including the level of urinary 11-dehydro thromboxane B2 (Tx-M), platelet aggregation to arachidonic acid and adenosine diphosphate, and closure time on the platelet function analyzer-100. We examined the concordance of these aspirin-resistance assays and their relation to cardiovascular risk factors in a primary prevention population. Asymptomatic patients (n = 1,311) at increased risk for coronary heart disease were evaluated before and after 2 weeks of aspirin (81 mg/day). Aspirin resistance was defined according to published criteria for these 3 assays of platelet function. Subjects were characterized for the presence of atherosclerosis risk factors. Agreement among the 3 assays was poor. Only 5 patients met aggregation criteria for aspirin resistance. Attenuated suppression of urinary Tx-M by aspirin was associated with a greater atherosclerotic risk profile and Framingham risk score in multivariable regression analysis. Aspirin resistance by platelet function analyzer-100 was associated only with increased von Willebrand factor levels and not with atherosclerotic risk profile. In conclusion, in a primary prevention population, different published criteria for aspirin resistance classify distinct groups of patients as aspirin resistant with very little overlap. Higher Tx-M, which reflects decreased suppression of thromboxane production in vivo, is the only criterion associated with atherosclerosis risk factors, suggesting that this measurement may represent the most relevant approach for identifying asymptomatic subjects whose aspirin treatment will "fail."

Adenosine Diphosphate↗

Aspirin resistance or variable response or both?

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that aspirin is effective in secondary prevention and in high-risk primary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events. However, a constellation of clinical and laboratory evidence exists that demonstrates diminished or absent response to aspirin in some patients. This has led to the concept of "aspirin resistance," which is a poorly defined, somewhat misleading term. The mechanism for aspirin resistance has not been fully established, but it is almost certainly due to a combination of clinical, biological, and genetic properties affecting platelet function. There are no criteria for distinguishing true resistance from treatment failure, and there is no consensus on whether the definition of aspirin resistance should be based on clinical outcomes, laboratory evidence, or both. Studies in large populations are needed to define antiplatelet resistance using consistent and reproducible assays and correlate the measurements with clinical outcomes. One such prospective randomized trial is completed, and 2 others are under way: the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial compared clopidogrel and aspirin with placebo and aspirin for high-risk primary or secondary prevention, and the Aspirin Nonresponsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial (ASCET) is evaluating whether switching to clopidogrel will be superior to continued aspirin therapy in improving clinical outcomes in aspirin-resistant patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The Research Evaluation to Study Individuals Who Show Thromboxane or P2Y(12) Receptor Resistance (RESISTOR) trial is investigating whether modifying antiplatelet regimens could prevent myonecrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with aspirin and clopidogrel resistance.

Aspirin↗

Aspirin resistance in cardiovascular disease: a review.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is effective at reducing the cardiovascular event rate in defined patient groups. The introduction of antiplatelet therapies other than aspirin and the concept of aspirin resistance have led to critical reappraisal of current treatment. This review aims to clarify the evidence for aspirin resistance in patients with atherosclerosis. METHODS: Medline search was performed to identify publications concerned with antiplatelet effects of aspirin and failure of aspirin therapy. Manual cross referencing was also performed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Wide variations in the rate of aspirin resistance (5.5-75%) have been reported. The lack of consensus on an appropriate definition and the number of different tests used to investigate aspirin resistance needs to be addressed. There are few studies where the primary aim was to document aspirin resistance or aspirin non-response. Further work should aim to investigate if aspirin resistance is clinically important and, if it is, what treatments may be beneficial to the at risk patient.

Arteriosclerosis↗